Category Archives: Republican

DBMR has added a new report titled Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market with analysis provides the insights which bring marketplace clearly into the focus and thus help organizations make better decisions. The market analysis report lists and studies the leading competitors, also provides the insights with strategic industry analysis of the key factors influencing the market dynamics. The market document comprises professional and in-depth study on the current state which focuses on the major drivers and restraints for the key players. This market research report makes available granular analysis of the market share, segmentation, revenue forecasts and geographic regions of the market. The finest report takes into account several key manufacturers which are based on company profile, sales data and product specifications etc.

The top-notch Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market report has an overview of the market and also reviews throughout development. The rapidly revolutionizing market place demands the best market and business solutions to thrive in the market. The business report also studies the key developments in the market with respect to current scenario and the forthcoming advancements. What is more, this market research report gives information about historic data, present market trends, environment, technological innovation, forthcoming technologies and the technical progress in the related industry. All the market data covered in the report aids industry to take enhanced steps to get their strategies better to trade goods and services.

Nanotechnology in medical devices market is expected to reach a market value of USD 20.52 billion by 2027 growing with the CAGR of 11.9% in the forecast period of 2020-2027. The increasing support of the government in the provision on advanced technology has been directly impacting the growth of nanotechnology in medical devices market.

Get Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts (with COVID 19 Analysis) @https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-nanotechnology-in-medical-devices-market&pm

Increasing geriatric population along with rising occurrences of diseases across the globe and growing adoption and need of high and advanced technology for the treatment of chronic diseases will accelerate the growth of the nanotechnology in medical devices market in the forecast period of 20202-2027. Rising number of applications from the emerging countries and advancement to technology for rich mid to late stage product pipeline will further create new opportunities for the growth of the market in the above mentioned forecast period.

Strict rules and regulations that will consume time in product approval and increasing process of nanotechnology based medical devices will hamper the growth of the market in the forecast period of 2020-2027.

Competitive Landscape and Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market Share Analysis

Nanotechnology in medical devices market competitive landscape provides details by competitor. Details included are company overview, company financials, revenue generated, market potential, investment in research and development, new market initiatives, global presence, production sites and facilities, production capacities, company strengths and weaknesses, product launch, product width and breadth, application dominance. The above data points provided are only related to the companies focus related to nanotechnology in medical devices market.

The major players covered in the nanotechnology in medical devices market report are 3M, Dentsply Sirona., Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., PerkinElmer Inc, GENERAL ELECTRIC, Ferro Corporation, Eppendorf AG, Greiner Bio One International GmbH, ZELLMECHANIK DRESDEN, TV Rheinland, Medtronic, Boston Scientific Corporation, BIOTRONIK SE & Co. KG, LivaNova PLC, Demant A/S, Cochlear Ltd., Sonova, MED-EL, DEKRA, among other domestic and global players. Market share data is available for Global, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific (APAC), Middle East and Africa (MEA) and South America separately. DBMR analysts understand competitive strengths and provide competitive analysis for each competitor separately.

Global Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market Scope and Market Size

Nanotechnology in medical devices market is segmented on the basis of product and application. The growth amongst these segments will help you analyse meagre growth segments in the industries, and provide the users with valuable market overview and market insights to help them in making strategic decisions for identification of core market applications.

Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market Country Level Analysis

Nanotechnology in medical devices market is analysed and market size insights and trends are provided by country, product and application as referenced above.

The countries covered in the nanotechnology in medical devices market report are U.S., Canada and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K., Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Rest of Europe in Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA) as a part of Middle East and Africa (MEA), Brazil, Argentina and Rest of South America as part of South America.

North America dominates the nanotechnology in medical devices market because of prevalence of majority of nanotechnology based medical devices players and increasing government initiatives, while Asia-Pacific is expected to grow at the highest growth rate in the forecast period of 2020 to 2027 because of increasing geriatric population, international research collaboration and increasing investment in research and development of nanotechnology.

The country section of the nanotechnology in medical devices market report also provides individual market impacting factors and changes in regulation in the market domestically that impacts the current and future trends of the market. Data points such as consumption volumes, production sites and volumes, import export analysis, price trend analysis, cost of raw materials, down-stream and upstream value chain analysis are some of the major pointers used to forecast the market scenario for individual countries. Also, presence and availability of global brands and their challenges faced due to large or scarce competition from local and domestic brands, impact of domestic tariffs and trade routes are considered while providing forecast analysis of the country data.

For More Insights Get FREE Detailed TOC @https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-nanotechnology-in-medical-devices-market&pm

Healthcare Infrastructure Growth Installed Base and New Technology Penetration

Nanotechnology in medical devices market also provides you with detailed market analysis for every country growth in healthcare expenditure for capital equipment, installed base of different kind of products for nanotechnology in medical devices market, impact of technology using life line curves and changes in healthcare regulatory scenarios and their impact on the nanotechnology in medical devices market. The data is available for historic period 2010 to 2018.

About Data Bridge Market Research:

An absolute way to forecast what future holds is to comprehend the trend today!Data Bridge set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavors to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.

Contact:

Data Bridge Market Research

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

Email @ Corporatesales@databridgemarketresearch.com

Read more here:

Nanotechnology in Medical Devices Market 2021 Leading Players, Industry Updates, Outlook and COVID-19 Impact Analysis 2028 The Manomet Current - The...

Nanotechnology Market in the estimated forecast period. The report summarizes and defines the impact of the external factors which are affecting the growth and revenues of the market in the predicted forecast period. Also, with the emergence of the global pandemic, the effect of COVID-19 is analyzed in the Nanotechnology report. On the basis of type and applications, the entrance of new products and research involved in the growth of innovative products is one of the major aspects which is expected to have an influence on the Nanotechnology Market. In addition, the impact of Covid-19 on production and the impact of demand on these products is one of the major factors that are likely to affect the growth of the market during the forecast period.

This research gives an in-depth analysis of the Nanotechnology market in the top five regions and features the latest market trends, forecast, share of the overall industry, growth rate, and outlook by 2026. The performance of the global Nanotechnology market relied on achieving USD XX million by 2026 at CAGR xx% during the forecast period 2019-2026.

Access more details about this report at @ https://www.marketresearchstore.com/sample/nanotechnology-market-798181

(This is our current offer and this report Nanotechnology analyzes the impact of Covid-19 on the global market and is updated by the prevailing situation, particularly forecasts).

The most advanced business trends, market dynamics, and business chain study are included in the report. Moreover, the research report also helps the market contenders to scrutinize the possibility and investment opportunities. The report offers unique market insights, analysis of top vendors, growth, challenges into the Nanotechnology market. Section-wise analysis of complete Nanotechnology industry, development strategies, and market risks is analyzed in the report.

Global Nanotechnology Market Analysis by Key Players: Clariant, Kumho Petrochemical, 3M, Thomas Swan, Nanophase Technologies, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Hitachi, Arkema, Shenzhen Dynanonic, Applied Materials, Showa Denko, Minerals Technologies, Ocsial, Sakai Chemical, Cnano Technology, DuPont, Mitsubishi

This report gives the readers country-wise analysis as well as the actual time insights, that present a crucial role in making a decision. The formation of the report is not restricted to specifying important indicators. In addition, a distinction in the report is that it also covers the country-level analysis of the regulatory landscape, technology penetration, predictive and prescriptive trends.

Nanotechnology Market, By Type

Nanomaterials, Nanotools, Nanodevices

Nanotechnology Market, By Applications

Biomedical, Electronics, Energy, Environmental, Manufacturing, Others

Nanotechnology Market Regional overview:

In the report, experts analyze and forecast the Nanotechnology market on a global as well as regional level. Taking into account every perspective of the market in terms of regions. The report examines North America, the Middle East, and Africa, Latin America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific. The current trends and different opportunities in these regions are analyzed that can influence the growth of the market in the forecast period 2020 to 2026.

Important features included in the TOC of the Global Nanotechnology Market:

Chapter 1: Introduction, Objective of Study and Research Scope the Nanotechnology market

Chapter 2: Summary of the Nanotechnology Market with basic information

Chapter 3: Nanotechnology Market Dynamics of the Industry Demonstrating Drivers, Trends, and Challenges

Chapter 4: Visualizing SWOT Analysis, Supply & Value Chain Analysis, Nanotechnology Market Factor Analysis, Porters Five Forces Analysis, the PESTEL Analysis, Patent & Trademark Analysis.

Chapter 5: Presenting market size by Type, Application/End-User, and Region 2016-2026

Chapter 6: Evaluating the top manufacturers of the Nanotechnology market which contains its Competitive Landscape, Peer Group Analysis, BCG Matrix & Company Profile

Chapter 7: To assess the market by manufacturers, segments, countries with revenue, share, and sales (2020-2026).

Chapter 8 & 9: Presenting the Appendix, Data Source, and Methodology

Lastly, Nanotechnology Market is an important source of guidance for companies and individuals in the decision framework.

To Inquire about the Discount available with the report, visit @ https://www.marketresearchstore.com/inquiry/nanotechnology-market-798181

Key Questions Answered in the Report Include:

What are the difficulties and chances for the growth of the market? What will the development rate and market size will be in 2026? What are the major driving factors in the Global Nanotechnology Market? What are the main trends of the market that are affecting the market growth? What type of opportunities and threats faced by the players in the global market? What are the outcomes of the five forces analysis of the Global Nanotechnology Market?

About Us:

MarketResearchStore.com is a single destination for all the industry, company, and country reports. We feature a large repository of the latest industry reports, leading and niche company profiles, and market statistics released by reputed private publishers and public organizations.

Contact the US:

Joel JohnSuite #8138, 3422 SW 15 Street,Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442United StatesToll Free: +1-855-465-4651 (USA-CANADA)Tel: +1-386-310-3803Web: http://www.marketresearchstore.comEmail: sales@marketresearchstore.com

Read the rest here:

Nanotechnology Market Competitive Research And Precise Outlook 2021 To 2026 KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper - KSU | The Sentinel Newspaper

"In general, I think hes done a good job. But I dont think he did a good job handling the 2020 election," said one Republican voter.

WOODSTOCK, Ga. Governor Brian Kemp launched his re-election campaign this week and Georgia voters are already weighing in on his prospects following his nearly two and a half years in office.

The question many have, is whether Governor Kemp can keep Republicans voters on his team next year.

When Republican Kelly Sirois of Woodstock was asked what she thinks of Kemp, she responded with an exasperated sigh.

"Oh gosh, that is a loaded question," she said. "I voted for Governor Kemp. I voted for President Trump."

Siroys embodies the conflict some Republican voters have about Kemp.

"In general, I think hes done a good job. But I dont think he did a good job handling the 2020 election," said Republican Scott Barton.

Barton said he had been a Kemp supporter, but he later said he wouldn't be next year. "I hope he gets primaried, using the shorthand for opposition within the party primary."

So far, only former Democratic state Rep. Vernon Jones has announced he'll oppose Kemp in the GOP primary.

Barton and Siroys are among those exasperated by Kemp's willingness to steer clear of the unfounded attacks on the election leveled by then President Trump.

"State Republicans led by Kemp kind of caved, and thats not what I voted for him for in 2018, so I dont know what our alternatives are... but Im not happy with Gov. Kemp whatsoever," said Siroys.

In a December 11Alive poll, Georgia voters overall split 45%-45% over their approval of Kemp. The same poll showed 73% of Republican voters approved of him while 21% of Republicans said they did not.

But some Republican voters in Cherokee County said they liked how Kemp handled the pandemic and the economy.

"I think under the circumstances of the pandemic, I think he navigated that very well," said Cindy Radler, who also praised Kemp's handling of the Trump challenge to Georgia's election.

One Cobb County voter visiting Woodstock second that notion saying Kemps been in a very tough position.

"Kemp chose not to shut down our economy during COVID which actually worked pretty well for us. At first I wasnt for him, but now I really do like what hes done, and Im a Democrat," said Frances Gilliam Gilliam who mentioned she voted for Joe Biden in 2020.

11Alive's poll in December showed 21 percent of Democrats approved of Kemps performance.

Read this article:

Can Governor Kemp keep Republican voters on his team next year? - 11Alive.com WXIA

The result of Democratic write-in votes yet to be announced will decide whether the winner of Tuesdays Republican primary for Harrisons 4th Ward commissioner will take the seat or whether a Democraic challenger will emerge.

Commissioners Chairman Bill Heasley served two four-year terms. But he said he chose not to run again because he supports term limits.

Republican Jim Erb bested Dylan Seelnacht for the Republican nomination.

There were no candidates on the Democratic ballot for the 4th Ward seat. However, there were 109 write-in votes, which could potentially set up a challenge to the Republican nominee in the Nov. 2 General Election.

Erb, 48, who is the director of Citizens Hose Ambulance Service, captured 82% of the Republican vote (131 votes).

Seelnacht, 28, co-owner of Seelnacht Iconic Interiors, brought in 28 votes (17.5%).

The race attracted 519 voters for a 76% turnout. The voter turnout for Allegheny County was only 28.7%.

Both Republicans vying for the 4th Ward seat pressed for changes and improvements in the township.

Im very happy with the results, Erb said. Im very grateful for the voters of the 4th Ward and I will do everything I can to work hard for them and not let them down.

Public safety is important to Erb, who has been a firefighter since joining Hilltop Hose in 1994. He would like to see more financial assistance for the EMS service from Harrison Township. He also wants PennDOT and Allegheny County to review speed limits on roads to tamp down the number of crashes.

Seelnacht wasnt sure what to expect from the election.

He liked meeting residents and learning about their struggles and issues.

I dont think I should throw in the towel after one attempt, he said. The future of our community means a lot to me.

Seelnacht is interested in revitalizing the Harrison, Brackenridge and Tarentum area. He started a Facebook group that led to in-person meetings of residents before the covid pandemic.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, mthomas@triblive.com or via Twitter .

Read more:

Newcomer Erb wins Republican nomination for commissioner's seat in Harrison's 4th Ward - TribLIVE

The Republican Study Committee (RSC), a conservative GOP House caucus, called Wednesday for cutting $14 trillion in spending over a decade to balance the budget and produce a surplus.

"Weve faced a year of unprecedented spending," the group's leaders wrote in a letter on their proposed budget. The letter was spearheadedby RSC Chairman Jim Banks (R-Ind.).

"As you can imagine, getting our spending under control and eliminating the deficit will prove to be a herculean task," it stated.

The group's alternative budget proposal would virtually eliminate the deficit by 2024 and go into surplus by 2026 by making aggressive cuts to discretionary spending and mandatory programs, relative to their current projected paths.

It would cut $2.5 trillion from current Medicare projections, $3.3 trillion from other health programs including Medicaid, and lop another $3.5 trillion from other mandatory programs that largely comprise the social safety net.

Discretionary spending, which funds the government, would drop by $3.5 trillion, reducing its size as a share of the economy by a third.

The RSC budget comes just more than a week before President BidenJoe BidenIsrael-Hamas ceasefire could come as soon as Friday: report US opposes UN resolution calling on Israel-Gaza ceasefire Parents of 54 migrant children found after separation under Trump administration MORE's full budget proposal is set for release on May 27.

In that budget, Biden is expected to lay out a fiscal plan for the country over a decade, incorporating his infrastructure and family support proposals alongside higher taxes for corporations and the wealthy.

He will also lay out his plans for mandatory spending programs such as Medicare and Social Security, some of which have limited runways in terms of funding from specialized trust funds.

Beyond the immediate fiscal year, long-term budget plans often have little to do with what policies are enacted. President TrumpDonald TrumpCuomo investigation includes priority virus testing for family, associates: report Anonymous Capitol Police letter to spur support for Jan. 6 probe causes stir Florida GOP passes bill that would clear way for Trump casino license MORE's budget proposals, for example, each proposed paths to eventually balance the government's budget, but the deficit ultimately increased in every year of his presidency.

Read more:

Conservative Republicans propose $14T in cuts to balance budget | TheHill - The Hill

AUSTIN, Texas Texas Republicans on Monday resumed their push to pass a major voting bill with an array of restrictions, moving the bill to a closed-door panel of lawmakers who will hash out the final version of the legislation.

But much of the suspense surrounding the panel, known as a conference committee, centers not on whether the legislation will pass the G.O.P.-controlled Legislature, but on what measures it will include when it does.

After a late-night scramble of last-minute negotiations among lawmakers last week, it looked as if recently introduced voting options, such as drive-through voting and 24-hour voting, would survive Republicans initial attempt to ban them. The version of the bill passed by the State Senate would have prohibited those types of voting, but the House version passed last week made no mention of either provision.

However, State Senator Bryan Hughes, the Republican sponsor of the initial bill and one of the committee members who will shape the final version behind closed doors, said in an interview last week that he would like to see the provisions banning drive-through voting and 24-hour voting added back to the final bill.

It makes sense, Mr. Hughes said, citing internal polling suggesting that Texas voters preferred standardized hours for early voting across the state. So theres some predictability and people are confident that the rules are being followed.

The conference committee will meet this week to start crafting a final version of the bill, which would then be sent for a final up-or-down vote in both chambers. The Senate announced its members made up of four Republicans and one Democrat on Monday, and the House will make its appointments when the chamber convenes on Tuesday.

The bill initially sought a host of new restrictions on voting that would have had an outsize impact on voters in cities, most notably in Harris County, the biggest county in the state and home to Houston.

During the coronavirus pandemic, Harris County introduced a drive-through voting option, which more than 127,000 voters used in the general election. It also had a single day of 24-hour voting, which more than 10,000 voters used to cast ballots. The original bill that passed the House would have banned both of those methods, as well as placed limitations on the allocation of voting machines in counties with a population of more than one million, which election officials had said could force the closure of some polling locations.

But as the bill made its way through the Legislature, most of those provisions were removed. The bill as it passed the House included provisions greatly expanding the autonomy and authority of partisan poll watchers, included new penalties for election officials and workers who violate the rules, and barred officials from sending out absentee ballots to voters who have not requested them.

Mr. Hughes said he wanted the provisions against drive-through and 24-hour voting to be added back to the bill so there would be uniformity among counties in how elections are run.

Amid months of false claims by former President Donald J. Trump that the 2020 election was stolen from him,Republican lawmakers in many states are marching aheadto pass laws making it harder to vote and changing how elections are run, frustrating Democrats and even some election officials in their own party.

One county cant just make up the rules, Mr. Hughes said. Houstons not the capital of Texas. Harris County doesnt need to do that. Whether I like the change or I dislike it, one county cant just make up the rules on the fly. That doesnt work.

Democrats in the Legislature have argued that this logic hampers the administration of elections, which are best run when local officials are empowered to address problems in their communities.

You really cant have uniformity when every county is different. Harris County is different than Loving County, said Jessica Gonzlez, a state representative and the Democratic vice chair of the House Elections Committee, referring to a county in West Texas with less than 200 residents. And so, in my experience in doing voter protection work, its important that these elections officials are able to administer their elections, because theyre the ones who are actually on the ground and able to address those issues.

If legislators in Texas were to add back provisions from the version of the voting bill that initially passed the State Senate, the state would stand as somewhat of an outlier nationally. Republicans in other states have tended to remove some of the strictest measures from voting bills as they make their way through legislatures. Both Georgia and Florida initially introduced bills that featured much more strident restrictions such as limiting voting on Sunday or banning drop boxes before settling on final versions that allowed for some weekend voting and limited drop box usage.

Texas is one of the last major battleground states working toward an overhaul of its voting rules and regulations. The Legislature is in session until the end of May, so any law will have to be on its way to the desk of Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, by midnight, June 1.

Read more here:

Just How Strict Will Texas Republicans Voting Bill Be? - The New York Times

Having tired of the culture wars, Republicans have returned to the familiar and comforting battlefield of the class wars.

The GOP is seizing on disappointing jobs numbers as an excuse to call for the end of extended unemployment benefits, based on the slender and debunked premise that they have discouraged people from seeking work.

Neil Bradley, the executive vice president and chief policy officer of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the jobs report begins to confirm that this is a barrier not the only barrier, but a barrier to filling open positions in the recovery, the New York Times reported. He added that, we absolutely have to begin to make the preparation to turn the supplement off. The sooner we do that, the sooner its going to become clear how this has been holding us back.

Republican Rep. Kevin Brady piled on, declaring that the White Houses strategies, which generally have improved the economy, was sabotaging our jobs recovery with promises of higher taxes and regulation on local businesses that discourage hiring and drive jobs overseas.

Last week, the White House stiffened its line, saying people who turned down employment risked losing their benefits. President Joe Biden has continued to defend the more generous benefits, however.

Meanwhile, red state governors are parroting the national line, and have announced that theyll turn down hundreds of millions of dollars in federal assistance to force their residents to return to poorly paying service-sector jobs with horrible benefits and potentially unsafe working conditions exacerbated by mask- and vaccine-denying patrons.

In a way, its kind of refreshing to see Republicans drop the obsession with Dr. Seuss and other shiny-object attractions of the culture war and get back to their fundamental business of defending corporate America. There is no small irony that its happening even as the GOP continues to try to shed its image as the party of the rich and rebrand itself as the defender of the working class.

The rhetorical jiu-jitsu, however, is a gross oversimplification of the tectonic forces that are reshaping the post-pandemic economy, as NBC News and other outlets have detailed.

First up, yes, its undeniably true that there are more jobs than there are people applying for open positions. Thats happening, in part, because people who got discouraged during January and February havent yet gotten the memo that the tide has turned.

But its also true that the pandemic-driven changes that reshaped the economy to begin with: home-schooling, childcare, and concerns about avoiding infection in the workplace until theyre fully vaccinated, also are causing people to hang back.

Its not just labor demand and supply, these are tough working conditions, Bhushan Sethi, the global people and organization co-leader at PwC Consulting Agency, told NBC News.

I cant underscore enough the real concern of individuals, he continued. Am I safe? Will I be forced to trade personal safety around the virus and variants for a job?

Finally, its also true that some people are using this time to consider their options and contemplate job changes.

But heres irony rearing its ugly head again: Republicans in the states and on Capitol Hill are opposing or refusing those things that would actually encourage people to return to work.

Namely, a livable wage, paid child care, and incentives in the American Rescue Plan for holdout states to finally expand Medicaid.

And heres where the GOP further tips its hand: A lot of what Biden wants to do is paid for by taxes on the wealthiest Americans and corporations. While Republicans may want Coca-Cola to keep its trap shut about odious efforts to restrict voting in Georgia, they still know on which side their fundraising bread is buttered.

Which is why you saw Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell sprain his tongue last month as he walked back his call for corporations to stay out of politics. Corporate donations, after all, slowed to a trickle after large companies cut off GOP lawmakers who opposed certifying the election results.

And as much as the exiled former Dear Leader held himself out as a champion of the forgotten man, he spent much of his four years disassembling the regulatory state to make the turf friendlier to big business. And lets not leave out the deficit-exploding tax cuts that benefited the wealthiest Americans to the detriment of working Americans.

So while the GOPs recent rhetoric about lazy and ambition-free workers (and which workers are they referring to, by the way? Surely not the base?) is disappointing, its not particularly surprising.

The grift has been in plain sight the whole time.

An award-winning political journalist, John L. Micek is Editor-in-Chief of The Pennsylvania Capital-Star in Harrisburg, Pa. Email him at [emailprotected] and follow him on Twitter @ByJohnLMicek.

Previous

Next

See more here:

John Micek: Republicans and the return of class warfare - pressherald.com

Republican candidates in states across the country are seizing on critical race theory as a talking point in their effort to appeal to cultural conservatives.

Virginia Republican gubernatorial nominee Glenn Youngkin vowed to expel the academic movement from schools, while Ohio GOP Senate candidate Jane Timken took it on as part of a statewide listening tour.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantisRon DeSantisFlorida GOP passes bill that would clear way for Trump casino license Florida lawmakers approve Seminole Tribe sports betting Palm Beach prosecutor says DeSantis could delay hypothetical Trump extradition MORE (R) and South Dakota Gov. Kristi NoemKristi Lynn NoemRepublicans seize on conservative backlash against critical race theory Government indoctrination, whether 'critical' or 'patriotic,' is wrong Montana governor approves restrictions on transgender athletes in schools MORE (R), both potential presidential candidates in 2024, have also knocked critical race theory. Noem recently started a petition on her campaign website to keepit out of classrooms.

It offers Republicans a great opportunity to educate people about what we actually believe about race, said Terry Schilling, the executive director of the conservative think tank the American Principles Project.

Schilling added that his organization was considering wading into the fight over the academic movement by running and testing the effectiveness of ads ahead of 2022.

The Republican effort comes after the party exceeded expectations in the 2020 elections, holding on to a number of crucial Senate seats and gaining seats in the House. Some Democrats argued the GOPs unexpectedly strong performance was due in part to conservatives tying Democrats to progressive policies like calls to defund the police.

Now, Republicans are looking to tie Democrats to critical race theory in an effort to paint them as radical.

Critical race theory was developed in the 1970s and 1980s by a number of American legal scholars who argued racism is rooted in the nations founding and that systemic racism continues to have a negative impact on the opportunities and treatment of people of color at all levels of society today.

But opponents of the theory say it teaches students to disparage the U.S. and works to sow racial divisions in classrooms.

White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiGOP senator seeks clarity from Biden on Trump-era peace deals Here's why 'Neanderthal' Texas governor is vindicated on early mask mandate call The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Republicans seek to sink Jan. 6 commission MORE said that it was responsible to teach about systemic racism when asked about a proposal from Sen. Tom CottonTom Bryant CottonThe Memo: In Democratic divide, two visions of Israel Republicans seize on conservative backlash against critical race theory Tim Scott sparks buzz in crowded field of White House hopefuls MORE (R-Ark.), another potential presidential candidate, opposing critical race theory.

I dont think we would think that educating the youth and next and future leaders of the country on systemic racism is indoctrination. Thats actually responsible, Psaki said at a White House briefing on Thursday.

The debate over the issue has already swept across the U.S., with GOP-controlled legislatures in half a dozen states taking up measures that would limit or ban the theory in schools.

Idaho Gov. Brad Little (R) signed a bill that would keep funding from schools that taught viewpoints that are often found in critical race theory, while the Texas state Senate approved similar legislation. Tennessees state House advanced its legislation on the issue earlier this month, and lawmakers in Arizona, Arkansas and Oklahoma are drafting legislation that would combat the movement being taught in classrooms.

Republicans are also pushing the issue at the federal level, with roughly 30 GOP representatives signaling their support for Rep. Dan Bishops (R-N.C.) Stop CRT Act, which would ban federal employees from having to receive racial equity and diversity training.

Particularly over the last year in lockdown, education has really rocketed to the forefront of definitely suburban mothers minds, said Nicki Neily, president of the conservative group Parents Defending Education.

A lot of this new stuff was sprung on them with no heads up, no buy-in, no introducing it to the community, she continued. They feel like theres sort of no input into the process.

A poll released last month from Parents Defending Education found that 58.3 percent of respondents said they did not believe students should be taught that the country was founded on racism and remains structurally racist today.

The debate reached a boiling point during a tense school board meeting this week in the Washington, D.C., suburban enclave of Loudoun County, Va., after the interim superintendent announced he was launching an equity plan. The superintendent has insisted that critical race theory is not a part of the school districts curriculum.

Virginia Republican candidates have taken the issue head-on ahead of the commonwealths elections later this year.

Its going to be detrimental to our schools and its not what we want, Virginia GOP lieutenant governor nominee Winsome Sears told Fox News on Thursday. It supposedly is to help someone who looks like me and Im sick of it. Im sick of being used by the Democrats, and so are many people who look like me.

Youngkin has campaigned frequently on education issues, including the reopening of schools and school choice, as well as critical race theory. He vowed during the campaign leading up to the state GOP convention that he would take critical race theory out of Virginias public schools if elected.

While the issue has shown its potential to galvanize the conservative base, some strategists say leaning into critical race theory may not be the right messaging move in growing and diversifying suburban areas, which could play a determining factor in upcoming races.

Conservatives also say they are unsure of how the issue will play in suburban enclaves, pointing to Democratic successes in those areas in the 2020 cycle.

I dont know how its going to play with suburban America, Schilling, of theAmerican Principles Project, said. Suburban America has been becoming more and more woke over the last four years.

More:

Republicans seize on conservative backlash against critical race theory | TheHill - The Hill

The group takes issue with the party's embrace of former President Donald Trump.

May 13, 2021, 3:20 PM

5 min read

More than 100 Republicans, including some former elected officials, have signed a letter threatening to break from the GOP and form a third party, taking aim at the party's embrace of former President Donald Trump and his continued false claims that the 2020 election was "stolen."

"[W]hen in our democratic republic, forces of conspiracy, division, and despotism arise, it is the patriotic duty of citizens to act collectively in defense of liberty and justice," read the preamble to their letter released Thursday. "We, therefore, declare our intent to catalyze an American renewal, and to either reimagine a party dedicated to our founding ideals or else hasten the creation of such an alternative."

Naming the effort, "A Call for American Renewal," the group is calling for the Republican Party "to rededicate itself to founding idealsor else hasten the creation of an alternative."

President Donald Trump boards Air Force One before departing Harlingen, Texas, Jan. 21, 2021.

Miles Taylor, the former Trump Department of Homeland Security official who anonymously wrote a book and New York Times op-ed criticizing the Trump administration, co-organized the effort, which includes former members of Congress, governors, ambassadors, Cabinet secretaries, state legislators and Republican Party chairs among the 152 signatories.

The initiative's website indicates it's an extension of Stand Up Republic and The Republican Political Alliance for Integrity and Reform (REPAIR), another group organized by Taylor that calls for reforms to the Republican Party.

Though most are retired and haven't announced plans to run for office, notable names include former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and former Transportation Secretary under George W. Bush, Mary Peters. Former congressional representatives include Barbara Comstock of Virginia, Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Reid Ribble of Wisconsin and Mickey Edwards of Oklahoma. Former Trump press secretary Anthony Scaramucci and official Olivia Troye also signed the statement.

Miles Taylor in Washington, DC, Nov. 16, 2020.

The effort comes on the heels of House Republican leaders voting to remove Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney from leadership because of her continued criticism of Trump and his baseless claims that the 2020 election was "stolen."

Cheney, in an interview with NBC's "Today Show" which aired Wednesday, warned that Republicans won't be able to convince voters to trust their agenda "if we are building our party on a foundation of lies."

The coalition teased more action to come including a town hall on "renewing America," saying it "cannot stay quiet in the face of rising political extremism."

ABC News' Katherine Faulders contributed to this report.

Read the rest here:

Over 100 Republicans sign letter threatening to form third party - ABC News

I have spent my whole life in small business, starting by myself and now employing 16 people and providing them with health insurance and retirement benefits. I was a member of the Republican Party because it was the party of opportunity, the party that let you follow your personal pursuit of happiness.

I think this is no longer the core drive of the party.

I left when the Texas attorney general sued to stop four battleground states from casting their votes in the Electoral College. He had support from a majority of the Republican House members.

I then sat back in shock on Jan. 6. The occupation of the Capitol confirmed my decision. The Trump followers are not interested in the public or the greater good, only power. They turned their back on the rule of law and on our founders precedent of peaceful transition of power. They didnt seem to care about the issues of the public, including employers like me.

I like what Mark Branse, a Republican Town Committee member, once wrote: My Republican Party doesnt just whine and lie about the other side; it stands for policies that we think are good for America: fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets, a free-market economy with the minimum necessary regulation, professionalism in government service, conservation of our natural resources, education and other support for those who are willing and able to work, and a modest safety net for those who, through no fault of their own, need that help.

But I dont think the Republican Party stands for those anymore. Today I see a party of no, not of policy.

Republicans used to worry about burdening future generations with debt and making promises that could not be kept. But they passed a tax bill that drove high deficits much higher.

Americans fought two World Wars and a Cold War to establish liberal democracy as the preeminent governance mechanism, instead of autocratic dictatorship. I do not want a leader who demonizes and destroys respectful disagreement. I do not want to see Liz Cheney erased as she was Wednesday because she has a different point of view from party leaders and is not afraid to express it.

I am disturbed by the partys almost cult-like obedience to former President Donald Trump. The price for crossing the leader is ostracism and ridicule, followed by rioting. Trump and his followers lies about a stolen election, abetted by Republican congressmen and senators, demonstrates his lack of respect for American values and governance and for professionalism in government service. His lie led to the tragedy of Jan. 6. The aim is not to serve the public and honor its wishes, but to retain power and stifle all opposition for the benefit of core supporters.

As a Republican, I believe that none of us achieves happiness all by ourselves. We have a network of family and friends to help us in our troubles and to educate us on the world. I also know that government is essential to do things we cant do ourselves, such as building schools, roads and libraries and making laws that guide societys behavior.

But Republicans in Washington dont seem to agree. Obstructing relief last summer when unemployment money was running out. Voting to eliminate the Affordable Care act without a replacement plan. These and other votes show that Republicans are not interested in improving the average persons life, nor providing for those who need a hand.

I think both political parties have failed us. The public is sadly left out.

I joined the Independent Party in the hope that it will be a broader-based group interested in the welfare of all people, instead of special interests at the extremes.

The Republican Party formed 150 years ago from anti-slavery Whigs and disaffected Democrats. I am hoping a third party emerges from the ashes of todays Republican Party to represent those of us who are in the middle and unrepresented now.

Chip Beckett, a local veterinarian, is a member of the Glastonbury Town Council.

Follow this link:

Opinion: I left the Republican Party because it left me - CT Post