Category Archives: Republican

A slate of conspiracy theorists and Republican state officials headlined a rally against COVID-19 mask and vaccine mandates Monday inside the state capitol.

The rally was held on the same day the legislature began its special session on redistricting. Their rhetoric included misleading or false claims about the vaccines and the efficacy of masks, as well as repeated comparisons of the present-day United States to the political climate in Germany before the Nazis took control.

Former ophthalmologist and aggressive anti-vaxxer Jim Meehan was among the events headline speakers. He touted the efficacy of ivermectin in preventing and treating COVID-19, which there is insufficient evidence for, and decried masks as useless, though they have been proven to slow the spread of the disease.

"Listen, ladies and gentlemen, we've got to rise against this medical tyranny. It's gone on too long," Meehan told the crowd on the second floor of the rotunda.

Other speakers framed the fight against vaccine and mask requirements as a Christian battle between good and evil, and the crowd was repeatedly urged to fight mandates. Six teachers fired from Oklahoma City Public Schools for not following a mask requirement made an appearance, as did Oklahoma Secretary of Education Ryan Walters, who is running for state superintendent.

"I'm a teacher, I'm the secretary of education, more importantly than any of that, I'm a parent. Love seeing all the kids here today. By the way, you know what? Your mom and dad are here today because they care about you and your future," Walters said.

Several Republican state lawmakers also spoke, including Broken Arrow Sen. Nathan Dahm, Yukon Sen. Jake Merrick, McCurtain Sen. Warren Hamilton, Tulsa Sen. Joe Newhouse and Shawnee Sen. Shane Jett.

"The federal government, in collusion with corporations and an international cabal, want to control the American people. You do not have to fear a free people who are armed to the teeth if you reflect their will," Jett said.

Attorney General John OConnor was on the schedule but was not seen during a broadcast carried on The Highwire, a website prominent anti-vaxxer Del Matthew Bigtree has used to spread COVID conspiracy theories and urge people not to follow health professionals' advice.

Rallygoers were encouraged to go meet with their state lawmakers afterward.

More here:

Republican state officials and conspiracy theorists share the stage at capitol rally against COVID vaccine and mask mandates - Public Radio Tulsa

CARMEL Assemblyman Kevin Byrne (R, C Mahopac) has announced thathe will not run for another term in Albany, but will instead seek to become the next Putnam County executive.

Current Putnam County Executive MaryEllen Odell is not eligible to run again in 2022, due to term limits. Byrne announced his campaign intentions in a letter sent to Republican and Conservative county committee members.

Byrne, recognized as one of the most conservativemembers of the state legislature, has received high marks from both the State Republican and Conservative Committees.

His Assembly district includes the Putnam County towns of Patterson, Southeast, Mahopac, and Putnam Valley.

Ourcountyneeds leaders who are unafraid to stand up andmake governmentwork better for taxpayers,his letter said. As county executive, Ill work to make Putnam our states most welcoming county for new business and job creation; to lift property-tax burdens and innovate to make services more efficient and cost-effective.

Link:

Conservative Republican to run for county executive - Mid Hudson News Website

Can white voters who back a Black candidate still hold racist beliefs and views?

That question has come to the fore in the wake of Glenn Youngkins gubernatorial victory in the blueish state of Virginia. Conservatives were quick to counter claims that Youngkins win represented the effectiveness of stoking racial fears with results from Virginias down-ballot election for lieutenant governor a contest where the Republican candidate, Winsome Sears, made history by becoming the first Black woman elected to statewide office in Virginia. The Wall Street Journals editorial board, for example, emphatically mocked the notion that voters called white supremacists elected a Black Lt. Gov. Conservative commentators on Fox News and Twitter, including Sears herself, also used the historic victory as an ostensible shield against accusations of Republican racism.

But supporting a Black candidate hardly precludes voters from harboring racist beliefs and motivations. Republicans are increasingly more likely than Democrats to hold prejudiced views of minorities, so Black Republicans like Sears often draw especially strong support from white Americans with otherwise anti-Black views simply because they draw most of their support from Republican voters.

A clear example of this was in the 2016 Republican presidential primary, when Ben Carson made a bid to become the GOPs first African American presidential nominee. Support for Carson was positively correlated with the belief that Black Americans have too much influence on U.S. politics, according to data from Washington University in St. Louiss American Panel Survey (TAPS) in late 2015:

Whites who thought African Americans had far too little influence disliked Carson and preferred Hillary Clinton by 60 percentage points in a hypothetical general election matchup. Meanwhile, Carson was very popular among whites who were most concerned about African Americans having too much influence in politics. So much so that whites who thought African Americans have far too much influence preferred Carson to Clinton by 45 points.

Again, much of that relationship is down to partisanship Republicans are more likely to hold prejudiced views and also more likely to support a Republican candidate. But thats the point: For many white GOP voters, anti-Black views dont seem to get in the way of supporting a Black Republican.

You can see a similar pattern in the January 2016 American National Election Studies Pilot Study. Carson received more favorable evaluations among the sizable minority (40 percent) of overtly prejudiced whites who agreed with the racist stereotype that most African Americans are more violent than most whites. This group rated Carson significantly more favorably on a 0-100 scale than the white moderate Republican presidential candidate, Jeb Bush (52 to 39, respectively). Then-candidate Donald Trump was the only politician in the survey who was rated higher than Carson among overtly prejudiced whites.

The contrast between how prejudiced whites rated Carson and Obama is rather revealing, as well. The sharp negative relationship between support for Obama and the endorsement of anti-Black stereotypes is consistent with several studies showing that prejudice was an unusually strong predictor of opposition to Obama from the 2008 election through the end of his presidency. These patterns also fit well with other political science research showing that racially prejudiced whites tend to be more opposed to Black Democrats than to white Democrats.

To make sense of why racially prejudiced white Americans are willing to support some Black candidates, it is worth considering why they so strongly oppose Black Democrats in the first place. Given the racialized nature of the two-party system in the United States, most Black political candidates are Democrats who embrace liberal positions on issues of race and justice. When asked whether they would support such a candidate, research shows that racially prejudiced white voters worry that these candidates will represent the interests of Black Americans, both because of a shared African American identity and because Democrats are perceived as the party more supportive of Black interests. So, it makes sense that racially resentful white Americans oppose candidates like Obama, as his racial identity and partisanship signaled to voters that he was more supportive of Black interests than prior presidents.

Put another way: Racially prejudiced white voters are not opposed to Black candidates simply because they are Black, but because they believe that most Black candidates will fight for those people and not people like us.

Black Republicans, on the other hand, are perceived differently by racially prejudiced white Americans. Their embrace of the Republican Party and its conservative ideology help assure racially prejudiced whites that, unlike Black Democrats, they are not in the business of carrying water for their own racial group. Instead, they are viewed as distinct from other Black elites. If Blackness is viewed as intertwined with a kind of racial liberalism that is antagonistic to the interests of white Americans, Black Republicans partisan and ideological commitments allay concerns that they are for them, not us.

This argument is buttressed by more recent scholarship in political science, which has found that Black candidates who embrace a bootstrap ideology an ideology that focuses on individual versus structural explanations of inequality are more positively evaluated by racially prejudiced whites relative to their white competitors. Explaining this finding, the authors note that racially prejudiced white voters might find black Republicans delivering an individualism message more favorable than they might find other candidates delivering a similar message precisely because the aesthetic character and the partisan affiliation of the messenger contradict racial and political expectations. LaFleur Stephens-Dougan, a professor of political science at Princeton University, similarly shows in her book Race to the Bottom that racially resentful whites respond well to Black candidates who take stances against the expected positions of their racial group a phenomenon she calls racial distancing.

Finally, voting for Black Republicans may also be especially appealing to racially prejudiced whites because it assuages concerns of being seen as racist by enabling them to say, in essence, I cant be racist! I voted for a Black candidate! Psychologists call this moral credentialing, and theres even some evidence that voters who expressed support for Obama shortly after the 2008 election felt more justified in favoring white Americans over Black Americans. Electing a Black Republican like Sears, who railed against critical race theory during the run-up to the election and supports voting restrictions that adversely affect racial minorities, is similarly used as a symbolic shield by the entire party from inevitable charges of championing racist policies. As we mentioned earlier, conservative media outlets and politicians are already weaponizing her victory against anyone who would dare suggest so.

But, of course, the role race and racism play in American politics is much more nuanced than those simplistic defenses suggest. When racially prejudiced whites oppose Black candidates, its not just because of the candidates skin color. Its also because they perceive (sometimes wrongly) that Black candidates, especially Black Democrats, have ideological commitments that are at odds with the interests of white Americans. Likewise, when racially prejudiced whites support Black Republicans, its hardly the case that theyve become progressive on race. Racially prejudiced whites did not vote for Sears because they appreciated her attachment and commitment to Black people. They were willing to support her because they discounted it.

Race, after all, is a social construct. It has meaning because we imbue it with meaning. Racially prejudiced whites are not hostile to Blackness, per se. They are hostile to a particular manifestation of Blackness one that reflects a commitment to racial justice and the advancement of the groups collective goals. Racially prejudiced whites are not bothered much by a manifestation of Blackness that is ideologically consistent with their own identities and attitudes. Why would they be? Searss conservative politics dont threaten the racial hierarchy, and her candidacy provides cover for a party thats often antagonistic to racial minorities. For racially prejudiced whites, the real question is what is there not to love about Black politicians like Sears?

Continue reading here:

Why White Voters With Racist Views Often Still Support Black Republicans - FiveThirtyEight

A high-profile group of Republicans, including former President Donald Trump and several with Utah ties, gathered with the nations largest conservative LGBTQ organization in Florida this past weekend.

Log Cabin Republicans held its annual Spirit of Lincoln Gala at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, where it honored former first lady Melania Trump, Utah Rep. Chris Stewart, Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel and Richard Grenell, the first openly gay Cabinet official who served as acting director of national intelligence in the Trump administration.

Robert OBrien, Trumps national security adviser during his last year in office, introduced Stewart at the awards ceremony.

It wasnt long ago that such a collection of Republican politicians wouldnt be sitting in a room with the gay community.

Grenell, who was working on the Bush-Quayle reelection campaign in 1992, recalled hearing Pat Buchanan outline a strategy where gay people were not welcome in the GOP at the Republican National Convention.

Now, 29 years later, we were at an event where the former president of the United States and first lady are welcoming us, and hosting 600 influential gays, lesbians and their straight allies, Grenell, who also served as U.S. ambassador to Germany, told Fox News. It is phenomenal for me to look back and see this and to champion an organization like Log Cabin.

At the gala, McDaniel announced the RNC Pride Coalition, an effort with Log Cabin Republicans to mobilize LGBTQ communities ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. She called the group a partner to fight for our countrys future, according to Fox News.

Conservatives in Log Cabin dont just share our vision for a free, secure and prosperous America they enrich it by adding unique perspectives to our party and recruiting even more diverse candidates and supporters to join our cause, McDaniel said.

Trump portrayed himself as friendly to gay rights in his 2016 presidential campaign but that seemed to lose emphasis during his administration.

Nearly 9 million LGBTQ adults were registered and eligible to vote in the 2020 general election. Half of registered LGBTQ voters were Democrats, 15% Republicans, 22% independents and 13% identified with another party or didnt know which party they most identify with, according to the Williams Institute at UCLA.

Log Cabin Republicans president Charles Moran told Fox News, When LGBT conservatives are included in Republican campaigns, we win.

Its absolutely critical for the Republican Party to be making the case that our policies lift and protect all, said Greg Smith, a former White House deputy political director and BYU graduate who OBrien recently hired as vice president of his consulting firm.

Stewart had little interaction with Log Cabin Republicans prior to the group recognizing him over the weekend for the Fairness for All Act he is proposing.

He reintroduced the legislation earlier this year aiming to balance nondiscrimination protections for gay and transgender Americans with protections for people of faith. The bill has 20 GOP House co-sponsors, and Stewart said hes trying to find Democrats in the House and Senate to support the measure. It faces a long road given House Democrats passed the Equality Act earlier this year.

Meeting with Log Cabin leaders was a first for Stewart. While the GOP has focused on attracting Latinos and working class whites, he said LGBTQ voters are part of that effort as well.

I think the Republican Party has been viewed as being somewhat hostile to some LGBTQ groups, and I think thats unnecessary. Theres just been a general softening on some of these things over the last 10 years, certainly since Prop 8 in California, he said.

Republican leaders, Stewart said, dont really care about a persons sexual orientation, skin color or ethnicity.

What we care about is do we share the same values. Do we share the same goals? Will you work with us? Can we work with you? he said.

Stewart described the Log Cabin Republicans at the event as a very enthusiastic group of people.

There was nothing said there that I disagreed with. We didnt talk about LGBTQ rights so much as we talked about how do we protect America, how do we make America stronger, he said. It was a very natural fit.

It might also be interesting to note Stewart, OBrien, who has been mentioned as a dark horse 2024 presidential candidate, and McDaniel, the niece of Utah GOP Sen. Mitt Romney, are all members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The church has taken criticism over the years for its stance on some LGBTQ issues such as same-sex marriage.

Stewart said he and OBrien talked about the fact that Latter-day Saints were part of the Log Cabin event. He said OBrien told him he was surprised that two or three Latter-day Saints were hosted at the event. But, Stewart said, he noted that they were graciously received.

Neither one of us talked about it before, Stewart said. It was more an observation after the fact that, hey, here are three LDS people and we felt very welcome.

At the gala, Stewart shared a table with Trump. He said they talked about golf, baseball and other things, though he declined to offer specifics, saying only they had some substantial conversations.

Stewart didnt come away with any inside knowledge of whether Trump, who he described as full of energy, would run for president in 2024.

I honestly dont think hes decided, Stewart said. I think hes waiting to see.

Read more from the original source:

Will more LGBTQ Americans join the Republican Party? GOP holds gala - Deseret News

A man walks past a free flu shot advertisement outside of a drugstore in New York on August 19, 2020.Bryan R. Smith/AFP/Getty Images

Recent polls show a 25 percentage-point gap between Republicans and Democrats who've gotten or will get a flu shot.

This is remarkably similar to the approximately 30 percentage-point partisan gap on COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was little to no partisan gap on influenza vaccine uptake.

Recent polls show Republicans are now much less likely to get a flu shot than they were before the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating that the politicization of the coronavirus vaccines is bleeding over into the flu immunization.

In the years prior to the global pandemic, Republicans and Democrats were similarly likely to get an annual influenza shot, CNN recently pointed out. In a February 2020 AP-NORC poll, 58% of Democrats and 54% of Republicans said they'd gotten a flu shot in the past year.

This year, between 65 and 68% of Democrats say they have gotten or will almost certainly get a flu shot, while between 40 and 44% of Republicans said they have or will get vaccinated against the flu, recent polls show. A UC San Diego study published last spring found that Republicans had become less likely to say they'd get a flu shot during the pandemic.

This gap is reflective of the approximately 30 percentage-point gap between Democrats and Republicans who've received a COVID-19 jab. While between 90 and 95% of Democrats 18 and older have gotten a coronavirus vaccine, just about 65% of adult Republicans have done the same.

The coronavirus vaccines, vaccine mandates, and other public health efforts related to the pandemic, including mask-wearing and lockdowns, have been heavily politicized over the last nearly two years. Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to oppose these mitigation efforts. Many Republican lawmakers and politicians have aggressively opposed COVID-19 vaccination and testing requirements, a position some experts fear will aggravate hesitancy and opposition to other vaccines as well.

Story continues

This partisan gap in vaccine uptake is one reason why there's a significantly higher COVID-19 death rate in counties that voted for former President Donald Trump and those that President Joe Biden won in 2020. Those who've received a COVID-19 vaccine are much more likely to have gotten or say they will get a flu shot than those who've failed to get vaccinated against the coronavirus.

This comes as public health officials have ramped up their efforts to promote the influenza vaccine. Last year, medical experts warned of a "twindemic" of both rising COVID-19 cases and a flu epidemic that could overwhelm hospitals already stretched to the brink with coronavirus patients, prior to the release of the COVID-19 vaccines. The 2020-2021 flu season was ultimately very mild, likely because many Americans stayed home, distanced from others, and wore masks to protect against the coronavirus. But with many COVID-19 mitigation efforts loosened this year, it's likely cases of the flu will be higher.

Some private entities have also stepped up their efforts to fight the flu as the season. Some universities have mandated that students and staff get the flu shot this year.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that everyone in the US six months and older get a flu shot. Medical experts warn that contracting the flu could make people more vulnerable to COVID-19 and that catching both viruses simultaneously could dramatically increase the risk of severe illness or death.

"The Covid-19 pandemic is not over, and the risk of both flu and Covid-19 circulating could put additional strain on hospitals and frontline health care professionals," CDC head Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in October.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Continued here:

The gap between Republicans and Democrats on flu shots is 20 percentage-points bigger than it was pre-pandemic - Yahoo News

He was able to impose his will on legislation, said Joe Vitale, a Democratic state senator. He was a force of nature. So it will be a loss for those of us who respect him and support him.

Mr. Sweeney was closely allied with George E. Norcross, an insurance executive and powerful power broker whose stranglehold on southern New Jersey politics lead many to see him as a shadow governor. The two remained close during both Mr. Murphys administration and former Gov. Chris Christies eight years. Without Mr. Sweeney at the helm of the Senate, and with other Democratic losses in the southern part of the state, Mr. Norcross may no longer possess the ironclad control to shape state policy, though he still counts numerous legislators as allies.

In an interview, Mr. Norcross described Mr. Sweeney as the Lyndon Johnson of the State Legislature who brought order to the chaos. He said the sudden swelling of Republican turnout and independents anger happened with such warp speed, that there was nothing that could have been anticipated or done, because its not like we didnt have the money available to do it.

He added that the Democratic Party will need to change, both in the state and around the country, to win back voters.

The Democratic Party is going to have to, and candidates for office are going to have to, redefine themselves as fiscally responsible legislators and ones that are going to spend government money wisely and not recklessly as is portrayed, Mr. Norcross said. They cant be defined as wanting to defund police or socialist.

Mr. Sweeneys loss sets up a wide open race for his successor. Nicholas Scutari, a Democratic state senator from northern New Jersey, is seen as a possible candidate to replace Mr. Sweeney in the senate leadership. Troy Singleton, a Democratic state senator from southern New Jersey, also has been mentioned as a possible replacement, among many other candidates.

Ed Dobzanski, 56, a union truck driver from Gibbstown, N.J., said he voted for Mr. Sweeney because of the Senate presidents long support for trade unions, but he thought his rivals victory reflects a public desire for change.

I think this is a backlash of the same people being in the same positions a long time, he said. People just wanted change, they are tired of career politicians.

Jon Hurdle contributed reporting from West Deptford Township, N.J.

Here is the original post:

Republican Truck Driver Beats Sweeney in N.J. Election - The New York Times

Just outside of Shawano, a billboard advertises the COVID-19 vaccine.

"I got the vaccine so I can protect myself and all the people I care about," it reads, alongside a photo of state Assembly Rep. Gary Tauchen, of Hartland.

Tauchen is a Republican, and his district is a conservative area. And like other rural parts of the state, uptake of the vaccine has been slow. Only 42 percent of Shawano County residents are fully vaccinated, according to state data, making it the county with the fifth-lowest vaccination rate in Wisconsin.

Tauchen, who is part of a coalition of leaders called the Community Health Action Team that is behind the new public messaging campaign, wants to see that change.

"I'm a farm boy by trade," Tauchen said. "We don't vaccinate part of our herd, we vaccinate the whole herd. And I think it's important to get as many people vaccinated as you can."

Tauchen is one of a relatively small number of elected Republican leaders in Wisconsin who've been willing to be a part of campaigns to publicly encourage vaccinations. GOP leaders like U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson have spent months promoting false or misleading information about the vaccine. In August, state Senate Majority Leader Chris Kapenga, R-Delafield, encouraged hospital workers to defy their employers' vaccine mandates.

Public health leaders say the politicization of the vaccine campaign has had deadly results.

Consistently for the last year Republicans have been more likely than Democrats or independents to tell opinion surveys they are skeptical of the vaccine. A study published in April found that unlike other groups, self-identified Republicans became more skeptical of the vaccine over time.

By October, the death rate from COVID-19 in rural areas was double what it was in urban regions of the Unites States, according to an analysis from the University of Iowa College of Public Health. Relatively low vaccination rates in rural areas were at least part of the explanation, according to the report. In Wisconsin, the latest data show that in September unvaccinated people were five times more likely than fully vaccinated people to be infected with COVID-19, nine times more likely to be hospitalized and 19 times more likely to die.

That's why the Community Health Action Team, which is organized by the health system ThedaCare, launched the new campaign using grant money from the state Department of Health Services. In addition to the billboards, it includes a series of radio ads in which a Shawano parent and a school board member urge vaccinations as a way to keep schools open; and a doctor describes overloaded conditions at the local hospital.

Stay informed with WPR's email newsletter.

"So, when will this pandemic end?" the ads say. "It'll end when those who are able to get vaccinated, are vaccinated."

Public health campaigns promoting the COVID-19 vaccine have been going on for months. DHS paid for billboard campaigns across the state that featured local health providers doctors and nurses who might be recognizable, trusted sources of information to people in their communities. Like most of the country, Wisconsin saw a spike in vaccinations when they became widely available in the spring, followed by a precipitous decline in June. In early November, the state was averaging about 3,600 new vaccinations per day.

Julie Chikowski, vice president of ThedaCare Medical Center-Shawano,acknowledged persuasion happens slowly, and any gains from the new campaign in the Shawano area are likely to be incremental. But she said the group also made efforts to tailor their messages to that specific community.

"We tried to make it more about keeping the schools open, keeping the businesses open," Chikowski said. "We're not saying, 'You need to go get a vaccination,' because that's a huge turn-off for the community ... (People) want to understand: What's in it for Shawano?"

Chikowski said shehopes those messages and the messengers they've chosen can break through the politicized nature of the vaccine debate, at least for some people.

"The goal is to try to open minds, get the politics out of the vaccination process, and have people really look at the science," she said.

Tauchen, who was first elected in 2006, announced in January he would not seek reelection next year. He acknowledged his decision to retire also gives him political freedom to speak in favor of the vaccine without worrying about a backlash from vaccine-skeptical members of the Republican base.

"This is my last term, so I'm not really worried about getting elected again," he said. "I think it's the right thing to do."

Chikowski said she knows a lot of people are tired of thinking about the pandemic. But with cases and hospitalizations once again rising in Wisconsin, that's not a luxury health officials have.

"Is there fatigue? Absolutely, there's fatigue," she said. "But people are still dying, so we don't get to be tired. We get to try to find a new way to have a new message that somehow reaches people that says: Get a vaccination, please."

Excerpt from:

Republican lawmaker's pro-vaccine messages are part of an effort to 'get the politics out of the vaccination process' - Wisconsin Public Radio News

The Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger said on Sunday he would fight the cancer of Trumpism outside the congressional GOP, after he retires from the House next year.

In the House you can fight to try to tell the truth, the Illinois representative said, speaking to ABCs This Week. You can fight against the cancer in the Republican party of lies, of conspiracy, of dishonesty.

And you ultimately come to the realisation that basically itd be Liz Cheney and a few others that are telling the truth and there are about 190 people in the Republican party that arent going to say a word, and theres a leader of the Republican caucus [Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader] that is embracing Donald Trump with all he can.

Asked if he had handed Trump a win by quitting, he said he potentially had but added: Its not really handing a win as much to Donald Trump as it is to the cancerous kind of lie and conspiracy, not just wing anymore, but mainstream argument of the Republican party.

Kinzinger and Cheney were among 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump for inciting supporters to attack the Capitol on 6 January, in an attempt to overturn the election.

That made Trumps second impeachment the most bipartisan ever. Seven Republican senators voted to convict, not enough for a required super-majority, ensuring Trumps acquittal.

Another House Republican who voted for impeachment, Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, has announced his retirement. Trump greeted Kinzingers announcement by saying: Two down, eight to go. Others including Cheney have attracted challengers.

Kinzinger and Cheney are the only Republican members of the House select committee investigating 6 January. McCarthy withdrew co-operation when the speaker, Nancy Pelosi, rejected an attempt to put Trump allies on the panel.

Kinzinger told ABC Trumps lawsuit to stop the committee accessing presidential records held in the National Archives was an attempt to drag proceedings out long enough for Republicans to retake the House next year and thereby kill the investigation.

Look, they killed an independent commission, he said. Theyve killed any attempt to get to the truth. [But] we have sources beyond just those that are kind of making the news, the Steve Bannons, you know, the Archives. We have people coming in and talking to the committee every day.

I think if you look at that archive request and what the former president is trying to block, it is very telling when you look at things like call logs, etc We are going to fight as hard as we can to get that, and the president has no grounds to claim executive privilege as he is today.

Trump supporters, dominant in a GOP fully under the former presidents control, greeted Kinzingers retirement announcement with glee and abuse despite the fact that as a strong conservative, he mostly voted with Trump during Trumps time in office.

Kinzinger told ABC he intended to stay in politics.

The point is theres a lot of people that feel politically homeless, theres a lot of people that feel like something has to change in our politics, and I think its important to jump in with both feet and see where that goes. See if theres that market out there because whats happening, were failing the American people right now.

The political system is failing. And the Republicans in particular.

Kinzinger admitted that redistricting by Illinois Democrats that would affect his chances of re-election was part of his decision, saying: Im not complaining, its redistricting, I get it, its being done and abused everywhere. But when Democrats do say they want Republican partners to tell the truth, and then they specifically target me, it makes me wonder.

But he said a stronger push to retire had come from the direction of his party under Trump.

Its sitting back and saying, OK, what happens if I win again? I go back, probably Republicans will probably be in the majority. Im going to be fighting even harder and I havent seen any momentum in the party to move away from lies and towards truth.

See the rest here:

Republican Adam Kinzinger: Ill fight Trumpism cancer outside Congress - The Guardian

Most Americans trust that elections are fair. But only a third of Republicans agree, a poll finds. Kaz Fantone for NPR/Kaz Fantone for NPR hide caption

Most Americans trust that elections are fair. But only a third of Republicans agree, a poll finds.

A majority of Americans trust that elections are fair, are confident in their state and local governments' ability to administer elections, and will trust the results in 2022 and in 2024 regardless of whether their preferred candidate wins, a new NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll finds.

The survey also found that most Americans feel that former President Donald Trump has continued to say the 2020 election was rigged mostly because he didn't like the outcome.

But those results are largely because of Democrats and independents.

Many Republicans appear to have bought into Trump's lies about nonexistent widespread fraud in an election he lost.

The story is not simply a divide between the parties but also among those who tend to vote for Republicans. There was a big education gap between those with college degrees and those without that emerged in the survey when it came to Republicans and Republican-leaning independents.

The poll also found President Biden not faring well. His approval rating is down to 44%, with almost half disapproving. And among Democratic voters, there is little confidence in him as the standard-bearer once again in 2024.

Just over a third of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents said they thought the party has a better chance of winning the presidency in 2024 with Biden on the ballot again as opposed to someone else. Forty-four percent said someone else would be better, and 20% weren't sure.

This survey of 1,209 adults was conducted nationally from Oct. 18 to 22 and has a margin of error of 4 percentage points, meaning results could be 4 points lower or 4 points higher. Of those surveyed, 1,032 are registered voters. When they are referenced, there is a margin of error of 4.3 percentage points.

Overall, 58% said they trust elections in the country either a great deal or a good amount.

But while almost 9 in 10 Democrats and 60% of independents said so, just a third of Republicans agreed.

There were also big gaps by education. There's a 19-point gap between college-educated and non-college-educated on the question, and an even wider chasm among whites with and without college degrees.

Seventy-two percent of whites with degrees said they had trust in elections, while less than half of non-college-educated whites said they did.

There was more trust in state and local governments than the electoral process overall even though all elections in this country are conducted at the local level.

Seventy percent said they are either confident or very confident in their state and local governments to conduct elections fairly and accurately in 2022 and that mostly cuts across party lines. That included 60% of Republicans.

A similar margin of adults overall said they would trust the results if their candidate for Congress does not win in 2022, including a slight majority of Republicans (53%).

Republicans, though, did seem affected by Trump's messaging, because 60% said they have less confidence that their state and local governments will conduct the elections fairly and accurately since the 2020 presidential election.

Democrats and independents mostly see Republican griping about voter fraud as sour grapes.

When asked about states' efforts to conduct additional recounts of the 2020 presidential election results, 53% overall said those took place mostly because state officials didn't like the outcome.

Democrats (84%) and a majority of independents (56%) believed this to be the case, but a whopping three-quarters of Republicans said those extra counts happened mostly because there are real cases of fraud in these states.

When it came to Trump, there was even wider agreement with Democrats and independents that he's making false claims about the election being rigged mostly because he didn't like his loss.

Among Democrats, it was almost unanimous 96% while 69% of independents also said so. But when it came to Republicans, it was whiplash. Three-quarters again said it was mostly because he is right that there were real cases of fraud that changed the results.

No matter how many times it's said that that is flatly untrue, the overwhelming majority of Republicans say they simply don't believe it. It's a lie that Trump continues to push and is amplified by the conservative media echo chamber.

On a host of questions, a very wide education gap emerges among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, the kinds of people who essentially make up the universe of those who vote for GOP candidates.

On trusting if elections are fair, there is a 19-point divide between those with degrees and those without. About half of those with them say they trust elections, while less than 3 in 10 without degrees said so.

On trusting their local governments to conduct elections fairly and accurately, those with degrees were 12 points more likely to say they do trust them; on whether they will trust results, win or lose in 2022, those with degrees were 18 points more likely to say so; and there was a similar 17-point divide on whether they will trust the 2024 results even if their preferred candidate loses.

On state recounts, there was no difference 74% said they took place mostly because of real cases of fraud in those states. But when it came to Trump's claims, those without degrees were 10 points more likely to believe him.

A glaring finding in the survey for Biden is that just 36% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents thought they would have a better chance in 2024 with Biden on the ballot as opposed to someone else (44%).

Nonwhites were 10 points more likely to say Democrats have a better chance of winning with Biden than without him but even they were split with 43% saying so and 43% saying someone else would be better.

That is not a good starting place for a president who might seek reelection.

When it comes to 2022, Democrats have a 3-point edge, 44% to 41%, on who Americans would rather see in charge of Congress. But that is down from an 8-point advantage in September.

Trump starts in a better position than Biden with his base, but it's still not an overwhelming vote of confidence for a former president with as much sway as he appears to have with GOP elected officials.

Just half of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents said they'd be better off with Trump as their nominee than with someone else (35%).

But here there was also a major divide between those with college degrees and those without. While 58% of those who don't have a college degree said they would have a better chance with Trump, just 41% of those with degrees said so.

Visit link:

Most Republicans say they don't trust elections, an NPR poll finds - NPR

Progressive Rep. Ro KhannaRohit (Ro) KhannaRo Khanna optimistic that 'maybe one Republican' would vote for standalone bill on paid family leave Sunday shows preview: Frustration runs high as infrastructure talks hit setback Overnight Energy & Environment Presented by American Clean Power Big Oil's day in Congress MORE (D-Calif.) on Sunday expressed optimism that "maybe one Republican" would vote for a standalone bill that provided paid family leave after the provision was dropped from the latest iteration of a budget reconciliation framework.

Appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation," Khanna acknowledged that losing key climate provisions in the bill was a "setback," but pointed out that Democrats were currently working with a razor-thin majority, less than what former Presidents Obama and Clinton had when they were in office.

"I mean, they had 57, 60 senators. Here you've got 50/50," Khanna told host Margaret Brennan, who noted that the reconciliation package had zero Republican senators behind it.

"And that's the question Why isn't there a single Republican who's for paid family leave?," Khanna asked. "Why is there no one asking the Republicans they claim to be the working class party? They're not with us on paidfamily leave."

"Why isn't there a single Republican who for family paid leave?" @SecRaimondo questions, telling @margbrennan he wants a "single" standalone bill on paid family leave.

"Vote with us on paid family leave. Vote with us on child care," he implores his colleagues. pic.twitter.com/ZGBn6AgrMh

Brennan asked Khanna if he believed paid family leave could be achieved after 2022, when Democrats may likely lose their overall majority in Congress and asked if President BidenJoe BidenWhite House unveils strategy for 2050 net-zero goal Southwest investigating report pilot said 'Let's go Brandon' on flight House Rules Committee won't meet Monday on reconciliation package MORE had assured Democratic lawmakers as much.

"He said he will do everything he can on paid family and on community college," Khanna responded.

"I'm an optimist to think maybe one Republican who gives speech after speech sayingthey'refor the working class, they're for the forgotten American let's do a single bill on paid family leave," Khanna added. "They don't want tovote for the bigger thing?Votewith us onpaid family, vote with uson childcare, vote with us to help the working class. We are doing this because we don't have a single Republican vote to help the working class in this country."

More here:

Ro Khanna optimistic that 'maybe one Republican' would vote for standalone bill on paid family leave | TheHill - The Hill