Category Archives: Republican

Remember back in March 2016, when President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court, and Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell decided to hold up a confirmation vote in the Senate until after the presidential election, so the next president could select the replacement for Antonin Scalia?

With Obama being a Democrat and McConnell hoping a Republican would win the presidency, it was a gutsy move.

Well, its payback time.

It appears House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has outmaneuvered the Republicans by getting President Donald Trump impeached and holding up sending the articles hes being charged with to the Senate for a trial.

She asserts that she wont do that until shes assured by McConnell that the Senate will conduct a fair trial using documents and witnesses the White House has so far failed to provide.

Ive read speculation that maybe shell wait until after the 2020 election in the hope that Democrats can take the Senate. And, in the meantime, Trump will have to conduct his reelection attempt with an impeachment record on his resume.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

I love Nancy Pelosi.

She should be president!

Ben Thompson Jr.

Lebanon

Read more from the original source:

Outmaneuvering the Republicans (letter) | Letters To The Editor - LancasterOnline

LINCOLN, Neb. An executive order by President Trump giving states the right to refuse to take refugees is putting Republican governors in an uncomfortable position.

Theyre caught between immigration hardliners who want to shut the door and some Christian evangelicals who believe helping refugees is a moral obligation. Others say refugees are vital to fill jobs and keep rural communities afloat.

More than 30 governors have agreed to accept refugees, but about a dozen Republican governors have stayed silent as they face a decision that must be made by Jan. 21 so resettlement agencies can secure federal funding in time to plan where to place refugees.

Trumps executive order requires governors to publicly say they will accept refugees. They cannot automatically come to their states, even if cities and counties welcome them. So far, no one has opted to shut out refugees.

A North Dakota county voted this month to accept no more than 25 refugees next year, after initially signaling it would be the first to ban them.

Trump issued the order in September after slashing the number of refugees allowed into the United States in 2020 to a historic low of 18,000. The reduction is part of the administrations efforts to reduce both legal and illegal immigration.

With his order, Trump again thrust states and local governments into immigration policy, willingly or not. It has caused heated debates and raucous meetings in several states, including North Dakota and Wisconsin.

Trump says his administration acted to respect communities that believe they do not have enough jobs to support refugees. Refugees can move anywhere in the U.S. after their initial resettlement at their own expense.

Republican governors in Nebraska, West Virginia, Tennessee, Ohio, Indiana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Arizona, Iowa and Oklahoma have consented to accepting refugees in 2020. Vermonts Republican governor said he intends to accepts refugees.

Others have not taken a public stance. They include the Republican governors of Georgia and Missouri, along with Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas, the state that took in the largest number of refugees this year.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, the nations most populous state that resettles many refugees, also has not consented yet, but his office said he plans to do so.

In 2015, governors from 31 states nearly all with Republican governors, including Abbott tried to shut out Syrians, citing terrorism fears. But they didnt have the legal authority at the time.

Now that they do, some governors have struggled with the decision.

Faith-based groups have led an aggressive campaign urging them to keep accepting refugees, while immigration hardliners have criticized Republicans who have not used their new authority to put the brakes on refugees coming into their states.

Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts, who tried to turn away Syrians in 2015, spent weeks reviewing his options.

He gave his consent Thursday in an open letter to Trump co-signed by Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds and South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, praising the president for strengthening the vetting process.

Thanks to your leadership, Americans can be confident once again in the screening process for refugees entering the United States, the governors said in the letter.

Hatim Ido, a former U.S. Army translator and member of the persecuted Yazidi community who fled Iraq, was relieved to know Nebraskas doors are still open. Ido hopes his two sisters in Iraq will be able to join him someday in Lincoln.

Im really concerned about them, said Ido, a graduate student who became a U.S. citizen last year. I understand (government officials) need to be very careful. I just wish there was a process in place so we could bring them here.

Administration officials say refugee applicants are subject to the strictest, most comprehensive background checks for any group seeking to come to the U.S.

Fraud detection and national security officers now come overseas with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services teams who are processing refugees.

Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb made the distinction that opening the door to refugees does not mean hes going soft on illegal immigration.

A federal judge last year permanently blocked Indiana from trying to turn away Syrians under an order that Vice President Mike Pence championed as governor.

These are NOT illegal or unlawful immigrants but individuals who have gone through all the proper channels, Holcomb wrote in his consent letter.

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey announced his consent the same day this month that 300 evangelicals signed a letter urging him to keep letting refugees resettle as an exercise of our Christian faith.

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt said faith leaders reached out to him, too.

I appreciate Oklahoma churches who have assisted these individuals, he wrote in his consent letter.

Tennessees consent did not sit well with legislative leaders who sued the federal government over the resettlement program.

Our personal preference would have been to exercise the option to hit the pause button on accepting additional refugees in our state, House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Lt. Gov. Randy McNally said in a joint statement.

Gov. Bill Lee, who talks often about his Christian faith, said he had to follow his heart.

My commitment to these ideals is based on my faith, personally visiting refugee camps on multiple continents, and my years of experience ministering to refugees here in Tennessee, he wrote in his consent letter.

More than 80 local governments have written letters welcoming refugees. Many are rural towns in conservative states that have come to rely on young refugees to revitalize their economies.

We need workers, big time, said Nebraska Sen. John McCollister, a Republican who is sometimes at odds with his party. Refugees bring a lot of enthusiasm, and theyre some of our best entrepreneurs. They add a lot to the economy of Nebraska.

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert asked for more refugees in a letter to Trump last month. The Republican said Utah has the resources and space and that welcoming refugees is part of the culture in a state where members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints found refuge generations ago.

Its been striking to see the breadth of bipartisan support for refugee resettlement in the states, with a number of governors writing very strong letters of support, said Mark Greenberg, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute and a former official in the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, which includes refugee resettlement. He left in 2017.

Holly Johnson, who coordinates the Tennessee Office for Refugees within the Catholic Charities, is not surprised. Employers are chasing down resettlement agencies because they know refugees work hard, she said.

Three resettlement groups have sued to block Trumps order.

Wyoming Republican Gov. Mark Gordon does not plan to weigh in for now, his spokesman Michael Pearlman said, noting the state has not had a refugee resettlement program for decades.

GOP Gov. Asa Hutchinson said Arkansas is determining which communities may be interested in accepting refugees, looking at financial costs and verifying security checks but that no final decision has been made.

I am committed to ensure that refugees brought to Arkansas have a real chance to settle and become self-sufficient, he said.

Previous

Next

Go here to read the rest:

Republican governors grapple with whether to accept refugees - Press Herald

There has been a great deal of speculation as to why Nancy Pelosi was so anxious to rush her impeachment Schiff Show through Congress, but is now demanding that Mitch McConnell make the Senates process as unfair as hers was before she allows him to get the ball rolling. Many have even speculated that she is embarrassed by the whole thing and just wants it to go away before it completely kills the reelection hopes of too many Congressional Democrats. It is more probable, however, that she is demanding certainty that the Senate trial be fair, by which she means viciously biased against the President, because she knows that the Republicans are likely to give her everything she wants.

Pelosi has good reason to think that she can intimidate McConnell and other Senate Republican leaders into folding and transforming their impeachment proceedings into a Stalinist show trial that will suppress evidence exonerating the President, highlight the tendentious version of events that the House offered, and maybe even result in Trumps removal from office. The Republicans have a pattern going back well over half a century of caving in to Democrat demands and doing their bidding. Pelosi has witnessed a great deal of this firsthand as she grew to be a multimillionaire on her modest Congresswomans salary. Why should she think it will be any different this time?

Republican kowtowing to Democrats goes back to the era of Franklin D. Roosevelt. After Democrats successfully blamed Republicans for the Great Depression and initiated the massive expansion of federal power that was the New Deal, the Republicans nominated for president not critics of Roosevelts big government measures, but me-too candidates who praised what FDR was doing: Alf Landon, Wendell Willkie, and Thomas E. Dewey. Not surprisingly, each of these pale copies of the great New Dealer were trounced by the real thing.

Republicans who didnt think a huge increase of federal control over the daily lives of Americans was a terrific idea had their best chance in 1952, when Republicans won the trifecta of the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives for the first time since 1930. However, the new president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, would not hear of this. He declared: Should any party attempt to abolish social security and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things....Their number is negligible and they are stupid.

The Eisenhower administration backed up these harsh words with actions that would have pleased FDR. It expanded the Social Security program and supported a bill raising the hourly minimum wage from 75 cents ($7 today) to a dollar ($9.50 today). It tried, but failed, to get a bill passed requiring the federal government to underwrite private health insurance policies, which was the beginning of the long push for government control over the health care system.

Sixteen years later, Eisenhowers protg, Richard M. Nixon, became president. He succeeded Lyndon Johnson, whose Great Society and War on Poverty have cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars in failed urban development and welfare programs that have done little besides create a large group of people who are more or less permanently unemployed and wards of the state. And of course, they can always be relied on to vote Democratic.

Nixon did nothing to challenge any of this. And with the exception of Ronald Reagan, Republicans after Tricky Dick have been cut from the same cloth. Instead of challenging the Democrats, they allow them to set the agenda, and then maybe maybe! find some way to quibble over the details. They seldom if ever say that the latest government boondoggle shouldnt be done; they only dare to suggest that they could do the job more efficiently.

Given that this has been the pattern for decades, why shouldnt Pelosi think that the Republicans will behave as they always have up to now? It would be more surprising if they didnt. Even now, Republican governors are clamoring for more refugees to be sent to their states, as if they didnt already have enough Democrat voters. The Stupid Party is unlikely to miraculously find a spine in the Senate.

Robert Spencer is the director ofJihad Watchand a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of the New York Times bestsellersThe Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)andThe Truth About Muhammad. His latest book isThe Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process. Follow him on Twitterhere. Like him on Facebookhere.

Visit link:

Why Shouldnt Pelosi Try to Strong-Arm the Republicans? It Has Worked for Decades. | News and Politics - PJ Media

Thirty or so budget architects at the state Office of Planning & Budget spent the year tracking actual spending by government departments. In November and December they made budgetary lists and checked them twice.

For once the holidays pass, the really big work begins on cobbling together the state spending plan for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1.

January is when administration executives make their adjustments in preparation for the governor to present the executive budget proposal to legislators on Feb. 7.

That means six weeks of meetings with department heads, all of whom will be appealing preliminary budgets and arguing for more funding for this program over that service. Before Gov. John Bel Edwards signs off, he will want to ensure the budget proposal reflects his priorities, including the projects hes pushing this year expanding early childhood education and more money for public colleges and universities that could necessitate decreased spending elsewhere.

House Republicans made that task more difficult by blocking the Revenue Estimating Conferences projections that the state will bring in more money from taxes, fees and other revenue sources. In addition to creating more work for the budget architects, stalling the REC forecast also creates procedural difficulties and requires next years budget to be drafted using much lower estimates approved in April.

For the second time in as many years, conservatives in the Louisiana Legislature Thursday refused to certify how much money is available to sp

If we had a certified amount, if we were working off an official amount, wed have a sum certain that could be expended, then we could say we want to do more in these areas and were going to have to reduce the amounts in these areas, Commissioner of Administration Jay Dardenne said.

Dardennes Division of Administration includes the Office of Planning & Budget and has the job of drafting a budget that balances available revenues with spending on specific services, all of which have constituencies and many of which are governed by state law.

Traditionally, the governors executive budget, which he is required to draft and present at a specified time each year, serves as the base from which legislators rearrange, add and subtract then approve.

But that wont happen.

Last year, Edwards proposed a budget that used money as forecast by the REC economists but not approved the panel itself, rather than the lower numbers from the previous year.

Gov. John Bel Edwards said he intends to push for more funding for colleges, early childhood education and public teacher pay raises in the co

The play will be the same this year, Dardenne says, as the administration doesnt want to release a spending plan that details huge cuts that in the end wont be needed. If we went with the April forecast, we would have to be cutting an inordinate amount that doesnt represent reality. Were not going to play that game that makes it look like we dont have the revenue there when everybody knows the revenue is there, Dardenne said.

Republicans argue that the law requires an executive budget using the latest approved revenue numbers, even if it does mean huge cuts. Republican Attorney General Jeff Landry agreed.

Dardenne countered, By failure to get the unanimous approval, the governor is precluded from submitting a budget that represents the official forecast because we dont have the official forecast.

Though Edwards won reelection last month and is the only Democratic governor in the Deep South, the newly elected Louisiana Legislature is more conservative and has a two-thirds Republican majority in the Senate and a near super-majority in the House. New leaders will be selected in January, but the move in December to block new income figures indicates that the new group of GOP legislators also want to take on a larger role in the state budget.

"It's time, as you can see in the Legislature on both sides, that we start doing things differently. This is one of those steps," said House Appropriations Chair Cameron Henry, representing the House on the four-member REC and refusing to certify an increase of revenues that the other three of the members wanted. All four members must agree to the revenue projections.

The REC economists one for the Legislature and one for the administration point out that several indicators of Louisianas economy are getting better, though theyre not rising very fast. Meanwhile, national economists are predicting a possible recession during the next 18 months. The economists projection would allow for an additional $168 million to spend on prisons, education and other state services for the current fiscal year and $103 million for the following year, compared to the last official REC projection adopted in April.

Three weeks after winning a tight reelection, Gov. John Bel Edwards was in a playful mood as LSU prepared Thursday to head for Atlanta to cont

Henry urges caution. If a downturn is looming, state government shouldnt allow expenses to grow. The increased sales taxes and suspended tax exemptions that helped stabilized the states finances are scheduled to expire in 2025. The state should be wary about making the state budget bigger, he said.

Waiting until January, February or March would give the economists more information to make more accurate predictions, Henry said.

This years budget, which runs through June 30, is $31.63 billion with $9.72 billion coming from Louisiana taxpayers and businesses. (The rest are fees that are dedicated for specific purposes and $14.4 billion from the federal government.)

The GOP-dominated House drafted its own budget for the current fiscal year. After five months, and soon before the House-written instrument was presented, Speaker Taylor Barras, the New Iberia Republican sitting on the REC, lifted his opposition to the revenue forecast an acknowledgement that Louisiana was collecting more tax dollars as the economists said. It also saved the House from having to submit a budget with dramatic cuts.

Without a new amount, the administration is forced to use the last figure the REC agreed upon, which was in April, to draft the spending plan.

But a standstill budget doesnt really mean that the same amount spent last year is allocated for this year.

Increases in costs from year to year the average price of premiums for family health insurance policies, for instance, increased 5% from 2018 to 2019 requires state government to take money from programs and services to pay for the increased costs.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

See the rest here:

House Republicans and Democratic governor feud over the Louisiana budget, again - The Advocate

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said Thursday that several of his Republican colleagues in the Senate have severe misgivings about Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHealth care, spending bills fuel busy year for K Street Trump goes after Pelosi in early morning tweets complaining about impeachment GOP predicts bipartisan acquittal at Trump impeachment trial MOREs (R-Ky.) impeachment strategy to coordinate with the White House.

During a Capitol News Briefing on the Connecticut Network, Blumenthal spoke on the subject of impeachment, stating that there will be pressure on McConnell from other Republican lawmakers to employ a fair strategy for the impending impeachment trial in the upper chamber of Congress.

"I've talked to anywhere from five to 10 of my colleagues who have very severe misgivings about the direction that Mitch McConnell is going in denying a full, fair proceeding with witnesses and documents. My hope is that they will say publicly what Sen. Murkowski did, and really hold Mitch McConnell accountable," he said.

Earlier this month, McConnell told the press that he is not an impartial juror. This is a political process, when it came to impeachment proceedings.

He also told Fox News host Sean HannitySean Patrick HannityTrump blasts 'unfair' impeachment, 'extreme leftists' in speech to young conservatives Democrats hope to focus public's attention on McConnell in impeachment battle The Hill's 12:30 Report Presented by UANI Pelosi looks to play hardball on timing of impeachment trial MORE that he planned to coordinate with the White House counsel during the trial in the Senate.

However, McConnells admission has garnered criticism from both the left and the right. Notably, moderate GOP Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiMurkowski 'disturbed' by McConnell's pledge for 'total coordination' with White House on impeachment Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial Susan Collins set to play pivotal role in impeachment drama MORE (Alaska) said that she does not agree with McConnell about his impeachment strategy, adding that she was disturbed by the comments he made about his coordination with the White House.

Blumenthal said he hoped that if some of his Republican colleagues had the same worries, they would come forward like Murkowski did.

"I believe Sen. Murkowski is saying what a lot of my Republican colleagues are thinking, in fact, saying privately," he said.

The senator concluded his remarks by stating that McConnell is sabotaging this proceeding by saying he won't be impartial, echoing other Democratic criticisms.

The House voted to impeach President TrumpDonald John TrumpGermans think Trump is more dangerous to world peace than Kim Jong Un and Putin: survey Trump jokes removal of 'Home Alone 2' cameo from Canadian broadcast is retaliation from 'Justin T' Trump pushed drug cartel policy despite Cabinet objections: report MORE this month on two counts: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

Impeachment proceedings began when a whistleblower filed an anonymous complaint to Congress, alleging that the president withheld aid from Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenPrimary debates threaten to leave people of color behind Longtime campaign aide vows Sanders will continue to combat political establishment as president 2019 in Photos: 35 pictures in politics MORE on a July 25 call with the countrys President, Volodymyr Zelensky.

More here:

Blumenthal: Five to 10 Republicans have 'severe misgivings' about McConnell strategy | TheHill - The Hill

Trump is emotionally, intellectually and psychologically unfit for office, and Im sure a lot of Republicans feel the same way, Mr. Trott said. But if they say that, the social media barrage will be overwhelming. He added that he would be open to the presidential candidacy of former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York.

On the other hand, Mr. Trump dangles rewards to those who show loyalty a favorable tweet, or a presidential visit to their state and his heavy hand has assured victory for a number of Republican candidates in their primaries. That includes Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who did as many Fox News appearances as possible to draw the presidents attention.

The greatest fear any member of Congress has these days is losing a primary, said former Representative Carlos Curbelo, Republican of Florida, who lost his general election last year in a heavily Hispanic Miami-area district. Thats the foremost motivator.

The larger challenge with Mr. Trump is that all politics is personal with him, and he carefully tracks who on television is praising him or denouncing his latest rhetorical excess. He is the White House political director, Scott Reed, a longtime Republican consultant, said.

More conventional presidents may be more understanding of lawmakers who are pulled in a different direction by the political demands of their districts but Mr. Trump has shown little tolerance for such dissent. Mr. Curbelo, for instance, occasionally spoke out against Mr. Trump, particularly over immigration policy, and the president took notice.

Riding with Mr. Trump in his limousine on Key West last year, Mr. Curbelo recalled in an interview that the president had noted that people were lining the streets to show their support for him, and asked Mr. Curbelo if they were in his district.

He said they were, prompting the president to turn to others in the car and say: Maybe Carlos will stop saying such nasty things about me, Mr. Curbelo recalled.

More:

Fear and Loyalty: How Donald Trump Took Over the Republican Party - The New York Times

Their priorities are all about more money for the wealthy elite and an obvious power grab for those in office.

| 2:04 PM

One of the ways that Republicans demonstrate that they are the post-truth party is that, when Democrats are in office, they prioritize federal deficit reduction, but when theyre in charge, the deficit soars. Right on cue, the Wall Street Journal reported back in October that the federal deficit was about to reach $1 trillion.

A strong economy typically leads to narrower deficits, as rising household income and corporate profits help boost tax collections, while spending on safety-net programs such as unemployment insurance tends to decline.

The U.S. economy has been growing for 10 years as of July, the longest economic expansion on record. Yet annual U.S. deficits are on track to exceed $1 trillion starting this year, due in part to the 2017 tax law, which constrained federal revenue collection last year, and a 2018 budget deal that busted spending caps enacted in 2011.

When even Rupert Murdochs paper credits the Republican tax cuts as a contributor, you can take that one to the bank. Steve Benen put together a helpful chart to demonstrate what has happened to the deficit over time.

The blue bars during the Obama years were a result of the Great Recession when federal revenues plummeted, the demand for safety net programs like unemployment insurance rose, and one-time stimulus spending was required to kick-start the economy. But as the Wall Street Journal pointed out, we are now in the midst of the longest economic expansion on record, which means that the deficit should be shrinking. Instead, it is ballooning. In a world where truth mattered, that would mean the end of the Republican line about how tax cuts pay for themselves.

When Republicans were negotiating among themselves over their tax cut plan in 2017, they made it clear that their main goal was to reduce corporate tax rates. At the time, they complained that, at 39 percent, corporate tax rates in the U.S. were among the highest in the world. What they didnt want you to know is that the effective corporate tax rate (what was actually paid after all of the loopholes were incorporated) was around around 29 percent, right in the middle of the pack for industrialized countries.

After a full year of implementation, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy documented the effects of the Republican tax cuts, which lowered the corporate tax rate to 21 percent. Here are their key findings.

* The 379 profitable corporations identified in this study paid an effective federal income tax rate of 11.3 percent on their 2018 income, slightly more than half the statutory 21 percent tax.

* 91 corporations did not pay federal income taxes on their 2018 U.S. income. These corporations include Amazon, Chevron, Halliburton and IBM

* Another 56 companies paid effective tax rates between 0 percent and 5 percent on their 2018 income. Their average effective tax rate was 2.2 percent.

The richest corporations are now paying an effective tax rate of 11.3 percent, while most of the huge monopolies are paying nothing at all. Rather than trickling down, those reductions are causing the federal deficit to soar.

Meanwhile, Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell went on a spending spreeliterally bragging about his efforts to buy off Kentucky voters with what Mitt Romney once referred to as free stuff (emphasis mine).

Senate Majority LeaderMitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is delivering more than $1 billion worth of federal spending and tax breaks to his Kentucky constituents, just in time for Christmas and ahead of a potentially tough reelection campaign

McConnells wins in the spending legislation included coal miners pension benefits; $410 million for the construction of the new Robley Rex Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Louisville; $314 million for cleanup of Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, a $40 million increase over last years funding level; a tax break for spirits distillers worth an estimated $426 million in 2020 alone; and $65 million for the construction of the Forage Animal Production Lab at the University of Kentucky.

I was directly responsible directly responsible for these items, McConnell declared at the press conference.

He also secured a tax break for Kentuckys thoroughbred horse racing industry, $16.5 million for the Department of Agriculture to implement the pro-hemp provisions McConnell got into the 2018 farm bill and $61.3 million for new military construction projects at Fort Campbell.

We can have reasoned debates about federal deficits, taxes, and spending programs. But the naked lies from Republicans demonstrate that their approach has nothing to do with what is best for the American people. They have made it abundantly clear that their priorities are all about more money for the wealthy elite and an obvious power grab for those in office. It is beyond time to bust the myth that the GOP is the party of fiscal responsibility. They are nothing if not reckless and irresponsible.

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really worksand how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, Ill make a donation

Go here to see the original:

Republicans Are Fiscally Reckless and Irresponsible - Washington Monthly

Posted Fri, December 27th, 2019 10:00 am by Amy Howe

On February 13, 2016, 79-year-old Justice Antonin Scalia died at a ranch in Marfa, Texas. That night, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who was then the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., both declared that the Senate should not act on any new nomination for a Supreme Court justice until after the presidential election in November 2016. It has been standard practice, Grassley said, over the last nearly 80 years that Supreme Court nominees are not nominated and confirmed during a presidential election year. Given the huge divide in this country, Grassley continued, and the fact that then-President Barack Obama, above all others, has made no bones about his goal to use the courts to circumvent Congress and push through his own agenda, it only makes sense that we defer to the American people who will elect a new President to select the next Supreme Court Justice.

Despite Grassleys and McConnells pronouncements, on March 16, 2016, Obama nominated Chief Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to fill the vacancy left by Scalias death. The then-63-year-old Garland is a former prosecutor and a moderate who is widely respected on both sides of the aisle, but that wasnt enough to get him a hearing, and his nomination expired in January 2017 without a vote.

Meanwhile, in May of 2016 then-presidential candidate Donald Trump released a list of potential nominees that he said he planned to use as a guide to nominate our next United States Supreme Court justices. The list, which was the product of close collaboration with the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation, helped to reassure conservative voters about Trumps candidacy, and after his election Trump went on to choose from the expanded version of the list to fill the Scalia vacancy: On January 31, 2017, Trump nominated 49-year-old Neil Gorsuch, then a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, to succeed Scalia. Gorsuch was confirmed a little over two months later, retaining the seat as a conservative one; had Garland been nominated and confirmed instead, the court would have had five justices nominated by Democratic presidents, at least for the foreseeable future.

Posted in 2010-2019 Decade in review, Featured

Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Decade in review: Justice Antonin Scalias death and the Republican delay in filling the seat, SCOTUSblog (Dec. 27, 2019, 10:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2019/12/decade-in-review-justice-antonin-scalias-death-and-the-republican-delay-to-fill-the-seat/

Originally posted here:

Decade in review: Justice Antonin Scalias death and the Republican delay in filling the seat - SCOTUSblog

An anti-Trump Republican group announced new advertisements demanding testimony from White House officials in President TrumpDonald John TrumpGermans think Trump is more dangerous to world peace than Kim Jong Un and Putin: survey Trump jokes removal of 'Home Alone 2' cameo from Canadian broadcast is retaliation from 'Justin T' Trump pushed drug cartel policy despite Cabinet objections: report MORE's impeachment trial.

The Republicans for the Rule of Law's ad campaign features 11 new billboards and five new video ads, including one national ad that will air during Fox & Friends and Lou DobbsLouis (Lou) Carl DobbsRepublican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial On The Money: Trump rules out total rollback of Chinese tariffs | Buttigieg unveils T child care, college, housing plan | Global billionaires' wealth falls for first time since 2015 Trump rules out total rollback of Chinese tariffs MORE Tonight.

Four other advertisements will be targeted at constituents ofSens. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyRepublican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial Independent voters will make Donald Trump a one-term president Susan Collins set to play pivotal role in impeachment drama MORE (R-Utah), Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiMurkowski 'disturbed' by McConnell's pledge for 'total coordination' with White House on impeachment Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial Susan Collins set to play pivotal role in impeachment drama MORE (R-Alaska), Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsTrump expresses support for Susan Collins in competitive Senate race Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial Susan Collins set to play pivotal role in impeachment drama MORE (R-Maine) and Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderRepublican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial Susan Collins set to play pivotal role in impeachment drama Trump scramble to rack up accomplishments gives conservatives heartburn MORE (R-Tenn.)and will air during Fox & Friends and Hannity.

The video ads demand Trumps personal lawyer Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiLawyer for Giuliani associate to step down, citing client's financial 'hardship' Former pro golfer advanced business interests of indicted Giuliani associates: report Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial MORE, acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyTrump goes after Pelosi in early morning tweets complaining about impeachment GOP predicts bipartisan acquittal at Trump impeachment trial Trump attacks Democrats over impeachment following call with military members MORE, Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoGod did not elect Trump, people did Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial Iran: US sanctions 'reckless' MORE and former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonGOP predicts bipartisan acquittal at Trump impeachment trial Senators seek to weaponize Clinton trial in Trump impeachment Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial MORE be allowed to testify in front of the Senate.

These witnesses must testify, the national ad says. Call your senators now.

The digital billboards feature the four of them with duct tape over their mouthsas well as the text What is Trump hiding? and a call to specific senators to push for testimony from them.

Chris Truax, the Republicans for Rule of Law spokesman, said the Senate needs to have a fair and open trial that includes testimony from these witnesses.

Proper trials are seldom comfortable for the accused, but thats no reason not to hold one, even if the accused is President Trump, he said. Impeachment is the ultimate check on abuse of power by the president, and future generations wont thank us if we weaken it by treating it as just an exercise in partisan politics.

The group also launched a billboard in Times Square earlier this month with the textWhat is Trump hiding? ahead of the House vote to impeach the president.

The House impeached Trump on two articles of impeachment last week. The Senate is largely expected to acquit the president.

See the original post here:

Republican group to run ads in target states demanding testimony from White House officials in Trump impeachment trial | TheHill - The Hill

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

In the wake of every House Republican voting against impeaching Donald Trump, it's reasonable to see the GOP as the president's party, remade in his image. But to truly understand the transformation of the Republican Party during the Trump years, we actually should focus on someone else: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). Jordan's journey from gadfly loathed by party leadership to ranking committee member, presidential confidant, and party leader exemplifies how the GOP has changed in the Trump Era and how Trumpism won't be easily undone after the 45th president leaves office.

The ideological transformation of the Republican Party has been ongoing for more than a half century. What was once the party of moderates like Dwight Eisenhower and liberals like Nelson Rockefeller, dominated by figures from the two coasts and stalwarts in the Midwest, slowly became a staunchly conservative party centered in the South.

By the time Jordan was first elected to Congress in 2006, the highly conservative Texan George W. Bush was president. But Bush had a pragmatic streak. He cut bipartisan deals on education and immigration reform (which failed thanks to a revolt led by conservative talk radio), added a prescription drug benefit to Medicare, and preached compassionate conservatism.

The story of the party's move towards total war politics and Trumpism is the story of how Jordan's breed of politics eclipsed Bush's brand of conservatism.

Jordan was one of the most conservative members of the House during his first two terms. But he was also insignificant with Republicans in the minority. Once the Tea Party wave swept his party to power, however, Jordan was flush with new hardline allies. He was elected to lead the Republican Study Committee, a large conservative group within the new Republican majority.

Within months, he had become a thorn in the side of House Speaker John Boehner, insisting that failing to raise the debt ceiling would not result in the United States defaulting, and opposing a leadership proposal for addressing the matter. His staff even conspired with outside groups to pressure Republicans to vote against Boehner's proposal. Two years later, Jordan was a key player in forcing a government shutdown because President Obama would not agree to delaying and defunding his signature health-care legislation for a year a tactic Boehner had warned would leave leading Democrats grinning because they "can't believe we're this f---ing stupid." Though Republicans were widely perceived to have lost the shutdown battle, Jordan was unrepentant.

He believed that Democrats could be compelled to capitulate through the use of hardline tactics, brinkmanship, and a total unwillingness to compromise.

In 2015, Jordan became the founding chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, a smaller, even more hardline group that would come to fight against numerous leadership initiatives. By that fall, Freedom Caucus members against Jordan's counsel pushed Boehner into early retirement and helped scuttle the candidacy of Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy to succeed him.

While 70 percent of Freedom Caucus endorsed Paul Ryan to succeed Boehner, it was only after he made them numerous promises to secure their support. Even so, Jordan and his allies would make Ryan's life difficult as they had Boehner's. So much did leadership worry about Jordan that when House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz announced he would resign from Congress in 2017, leadership helped recruit Rep. Trey Gowdy to run for the position to ensure that it wouldn't fall to Jordan.

In an interview after retiring, Boehner called Jordan a "legislative terrorist" and an "asshole."

In an earlier era, a figure like Jordan who constantly picked fights with his own party's leadership would have faced serious repercussions. Banishment to the most insignificant and unpleasant committees, an inability to get things done for his home district, perhaps even a primary challenge.

But in an era with a proliferation of conservative media talk radio, cable news, and digital outlets someone like Jordan could instead become a star by picking the same fights. Conservative media is a business and the best radio and television comes from black and white content strongly voiced opinions, clear convictions, exhortations to principles, things that stir emotion and keep the audience tuned in. That meant that someone like Jordan preached what viewers and listeners the Republican base heard every day. Further, his style of politics made for far more compelling radio or television than a committee chairman or Republican leader explaining why divided government or Senate rules necessitated compromises.

This fit between the business interests of conservative media and his politics made Jordan one of the heroes on the conservative airwaves and a frequent guest. Stardom gave him too much of an independent power base by the mid-2010s for leadership to punish him meaningfully. He didn't need them for fundraising, and any attempt at discipline would've sent him scurrying to the airwaves to fight back. In the end, it might've been leadership who lost the fight because conservative media had the ear of exactly the sorts of voters who showed up in low turnout Republican primaries, the most critical elections in most Republican districts in an era of geographic polarization.

But while conservative media helped to make Jordan impervious to leadership criticism, it didn't make him part of that leadership. His elevation came thanks to Trump. Jordan caught the ear of Trump, and became a confidant and one of the president's fiercest defenders.

When Republicans lost control of the House in 2018 and Ryan and Gowdy retired, new House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and the Republican Steering Committee installed Jordan, with encouragement from Trump, as the ranking member of the Oversight Committee. This was a significant change from 2017, when there was doubt the Steering Committee would choose Jordan given the animosity from many Republicans towards him. And then as impeachment hearings were about to begin in front of the House Intelligence Committee, McCarthy made the unusual move of temporarily removing another Republican to add Jordan to the committee. McCarthy saw great benefit in Jordan's trademark aggressive questioning and vigorous defense of Trump.

During those hearings, Elise Stefanik, long seen as the anti-Jim Jordan, a leadership ally, one of the most moderate Republicans in the House, and someone previously focused on solutions and bipartisanship, became an instant sensation with Jordan-like questioning and charges against Democrats, and even joined him for press conferences. Reporting indicates that this was a savvy move for Stefanik both in her Republican-leaning district and within the House GOP.

While it's unquestionably easier for leadership to be aligned with Jordan in the minority, when they have no responsibility for governing, it's also true that the onetime leadership antagonist is now the top Republican on a key committee and a major spokesman for the House GOP. Stefanik's move exposes how Jordan's tactics are what Republican voters want from their elected officials. Far from an outsider, Jordan is now part of the Republican establishment one that sees politics much more like he does than George W. Bush. And that's not likely to change even when Trump leaves office, be it in 2021 or 2025.

For better or worse, it's Jim Jordan's GOP now.

Want more essential commentary and analysis like this delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for The Week's "Today's best articles" newsletter here.

Read this article:

How a 'legislative terrorist' conquered the Republican Party - The Week