Category Archives: Proud Boys

A man who applied to join the Proud Boys was sentenced Thursday to 33 months in prison after he threatened the life of then-Sen.-elect Raphael Warnock ahead of the Capitol riot in January 2021.

Eduard Florea used the social media app Parler to issue the threats against elected officials, trying to gather others to join him before the Jan. 6 insurrection, when a mob of supporters of then-president Donald Trump stormed the Capitol.

"Warnock is going to have a hard time casting votes for communist policies when he's swinging with the f***ing fish," Florea, a resident of Queens, New York, posted on Jan. 5.

"It's time to unleash some violence," he wrote.

Florea pleaded guilty to federal charges of transmitting threats in August. He never traveled to the Capitol, but authorities said his messages sought to contribute to the violence.

"With today's sentence, the defendant faces serious consequences threatening the life of United States Senator Raphael Warnock as part of his effort to foment violence at the Capitol on January 6," said Brean Peace, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

Florea, 41, was also convicted of having more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, despite being prohibited from possessing it because of a 2013 felony conviction.

At a court hearing following his arrest, a prosecutor said Florea had told the FBI he'd applied to join the white nationalist group Proud Boys, the New York Times reported. He posted online using an account with the handle LoneWolfWar to issue the threatening messages.

"We need to all come to an agreement. . .and go armed . . .and really take back Washington," he wrote on Jan. 5.

Later that evening, he posted again, writing, "Tomorrow may very [well] be the day war kicks off."

As an angry mob of Trump supporters rushed into the Capitol on Jan. 6, federal officials say Florea posted that he was planning to travel to DC with other armed supporters to join in the violence.

"Guns cleaned loaded," he wrote, "got a bunch of guys all armed and ready to deploy."

Florea was taken into custody on Jan. 12 at his home in Queens.

The rest is here:

A Proud Boys Supporter Was Sentenced To Almost Three Years In Prison For Threatening To Kill A Senator - BuzzFeed News

The District of Columbia has filed a civil lawsuit seeking harsh financial penalties against far-right groups Proud Boys and Oath Keepers over their role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump

By ASHRAF KHALIL Associated Press

December 14, 2021, 11:14 PM

3 min read

WASHINGTON -- The District of Columbia has filed a civil lawsuit seeking harsh financial penalties against far-right groups Proud Boys and Oath Keepers over their role in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol by supporters of former President Donald Trump.

The suit, filed Tuesday in federal court, also names dozens of the groups' senior members, many of whom already face criminal charges for taking part in the violent attack on the Capitol building while Congress was meeting to certify the 2020 election results.

Karl Racine, Washington's attorney general, said the lawsuit seeks compensation for damages to the District of Columbia and intends to inflict maximum financial damage on the groups responsible.

Out intent is to hold these violent mobsters and violent hate groups accountable and to get every penny of damage we can, Racine said. If it so happens that we bankrupt them, then that's a good day.

There was no immediate response to emails sent to the groups seeking comment.

The lawsuit cites as its basis a post-Civil War 1871 law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act. A similar tactic was used to secure a $26 million verdict last month against white supremacist groups and individuals responsible for organizing the violent 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in which one person was killed after a man plowed his car into a group of counter-protesters.

The lawsuit came as the Justice Department on Tuesday separately charged three more suspected members of the Proud Boys from Pennsylvania for their alleged roles in Januarys riot.

The men, Isaiah Giddings and Freedom Vy of Philadelphia and Brian Healion of Upper Darby, are all accused of working with another suspected Proud Boys member, Zachary Rehl who was arrested in March to breach the Capitol. Prosecutors say the group traveled together from Pennsylvania and the trio was photographed posing both outside the Capitol and inside the building.

Racine announced the suit Tuesday alongside Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.'s non-voting delegate in the House of Representatives. Norton said the suit is designed to secure extra funding to support D.C. police officers injured while defending the Capitol building and to serve as a warning to extremist groups.

They're going to have to spend money to defend themselves, Norton said. Even if we don't get a penny in restitution, this lawsuit's deterrent effect will say, Be prepared to spend money to defend yourself because we are coming after you.

Racine said evidence presented in the multiple federal criminal cases underway already proves explicit evidence of conspiracy to commit violent acts in the nation's capital. He said the lawsuit presents an opportunity to publicly explore and expose the financial support structure of the far-right extremist network.

I sure hope they try to defend the case, he said. "We can't wait to propound searing questions about the finances of these individuals and these groups.

The Proud Boys emerged from far-right fringes during the Trump administration to join mainstream GOP circles. The Oath Keepers is a militia group founded in 2009 that recruits current and former military, police and first responders.

See the original post:

Washington, DC, sues Proud Boys, Oath Keepers over Jan. 6 - ABC News

Tell me where I need to be and I am there, one member of a Proud Boys group in Wisconsin wrote last month about protests of mask mandates. I can drive 5-6 hours in any direction.

Think local, act local, wrote another member.

At some local meetings where the Proud Boys have shown up, they have spoken and threatened community leaders, according to news reports. At others, they have simply stood silently and watched. In the Telegram groups, some boasted that they had handed out their cellphone numbers to those interested in joining them.

While the Proud Boys membership is not public, Mr. Holt said the group appeared to be growing in small towns and counties.

Often, their presence has been enough to disrupt events. Last month, the school board in Beloit, Wis., said it canceled classes because some of the Proud Boys were at a local protest over mask requirements. In Orange County, Calif., the school board said in September that it would install metal detectors and hire extra security after several Proud Boys attended a meeting and threatened its members.

In New Hanover County, N.C., which has roughly 220,000 people and is two hours southeast of Charlotte, Stefanie Adams, the school board president, said she had read about the groups increasing appearances and began tracking the reports closely.

Ms. Adams said she had an inkling that the Proud Boys might show up in her school district, which has 25,000 students. Because North Carolina law requires the county school board to vote on whether to continue a mask mandate for students each month, the district had handled many contentious meetings over the issue, she said.

I figured we were on their radar, and that we might be next, Ms. Adams said. We knew we had to prepare for them coming to our town, too.

See the article here:

Proud Boys Regroup, Focusing on School Boards and Town Councils - The New York Times

'); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(""+val.title+""); if (val.poly != "" && val.polyimg != "") { $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append('"+val.ihtml+""); $("#expandable-weather-block .weather-index-alerts").show(); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body h2").css({"font-family":"'Fira Sans', sans-serif", "font-weight":"500", "padding-bottom":"10px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body p").css({"font-size":"14px", "line-height":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body span.wxalertnum").css({"float":"left", "width":"40px", "height":"40px", "color":"#ffffff", "line-height":"40px", "background-color":"#888888", "border-radius":"40px", "text-align":"center", "margin-right":"12px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body b").css("font-size", "18px"); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body li").css({"font-size":"14px", "line-height":"18px", "margin-bottom":"10px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body ul").css({"margin-bottom":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body pre").css({"margin-bottom":"24px"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body img").css({"width":"100%", "margin-bottom":"20px", "borderWidth":"1px", "border-style":"solid", "border-color":"#aaaaaa"}); $("#expandable-weather-block .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).css({"borderWidth":"0", "border-bottom-width":"1px", "border-style":"dashed", "border-color":"#aaaaaa", "padding-bottom":"10px", "margin-bottom":"40px"}); }); } function parseAlertJSON(json) { console.log(json); alertCount = 0; if (Object.keys(json.alerts).length > 0) { $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body ").empty(); } $.each(json.alerts, function(key, val) { alertCount++; $("#mrd-wx-alerts .alert_count").text(alertCount); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body ").append(''); $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(""+val.title+""); if (val.poly != "" && val.polyimg != "") { $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(''); } else if (val.fips != "" && val.fipsimg != "") { // $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(''); } $("#mrd-wx-alerts .modal-body #mrd-alert"+ alertCount).append(val.dhtml+"

Instruction

View post:

Self-proclaimed Proud Boy convicted of assault, menacing charges sentenced to 10 years in prison - KPTV.com

December 6, 2021

UPDATE

Apple teams up with Boys&GirlsClubs of America to bring new coding opportunities to young learners across the country

In celebration of Computer Science Education Week, Apple and Boys & Girls Clubs of America today launched a new program that will bring coding to Boys & Girls Clubs in more than a dozen US cities. This new collaboration will bring coding with Swift to tens of thousands of students across the country, building on Apples existing partnership with Boys & Girls Clubs of America through the companys Community Education Initiative in support of its Racial Equity and Justice Initiative.

Using iPad and Apples free Everyone Can Code curriculum and with ongoing professional support from Apple educators kids and teens at local Boys & Girls Clubs will integrate coding into their programming, giving students the opportunity to create and collaborate on the basics of app design and development, with an emphasis on critical thinking and creative problem-solving.

At Apple, we believe education is a force for equity, and that all learners should have the opportunity to explore and develop coding skills for their future, said Lisa Jackson, Apples vice president of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives. Together with the Boys & Girls Clubs of America, weve already introduced thousands of students to innovative technology experiences, and we are thrilled to expand our partnership to bring coding with Swift to even more communities across the country.

Boys & Girls Clubs of America is committed to helping youth reach their full potential, which includes equipping young people with critical thinking and problem-solving skills that will serve them for years to come, said Jim Clark, Boys & Girls Clubs of Americas president and CEO. We are thrilled to partner with Apple to enhance Club programming with innovative and educational coding activities that will build kids and teens engagement and opportunity in technology.

The program will initially launch in 10 new regions, including Atlanta; Austin, Texas; metro D.C.; Miami-Dade County, Florida; Wake County, North Carolina; and Silicon Valley, with the goal of expanding coding opportunities to clubs nationwide. Programming has already launched in Atlantic City, New Jersey; Chicago; Detroit; Nashville, Tennessee; and Newark, New Jersey, where engagement will continue to expand.

In New Jersey, Boys & Girls Club of Atlantic City opened a Design Lab and a STEAM Lab last year to support creativity, coding, and career development programming and the Club is opening a second STEAM Lab in January to create additional opportunities for young learners. The labs are equipped with iPad and Mac computers, and curricula incorporate Everyone Can Code, Everyone Can Create, and Develop in Swift. To prepare its students for future academic and professional pursuits, the Club is also launching a new STEAM preapprenticeship program that will teach students the foundations of working on iPad and Mac, eventually giving them the tools to seek a formal App Development with Swift certification.

Working with Apple this past year has been transformative for our students, who have had the opportunity to explore entirely new ways of thinking, creating, and pursuing their passions, said Stephanie Koch, Boys & Girls Club of Atlantic Citys CEO. The young people we work with are the future of Atlantic City, and were proud to partner with Apple to help them gain new skills to grow as learners and prepare for jobs in the 21st-century economy.

In Detroit, Apple helped support Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern Michigans summer Code to Career coding course and app challenge. The program brought together young adults ages 18 to 24 to learn the foundations of human interface design and the Swift coding language, using Apples Everyone Can Code curriculum. Students worked in small groups to create app prototypes designed to solve a challenge within the community including fashion sustainability, using hip-hop to build a sense of community, and improving city mobility. The club is now expanding this work further, bringing new devices and coding programming to its 11 locations across Greater Detroit.

Todays announcement builds on a 2020 initiative through which Apple donated 2,500 devices to Boys & Girls Clubs of America locations in Alabama; Arizona; California; Connecticut; Georgia; Idaho; Illinois; Louisiana; Massachusetts, Michigan; Minnesota; New Jersey; New York; Ohio; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Tennessee; Texas; Washington, D.C.; and Wisconsin.

Press Contacts

Rachel Wolf Tulley

Apple

rachel_tulley@apple.com

(408) 974-0078

Apple Media Helpline

media.help@apple.com

(408) 974-2042

Go here to read the rest:

Apple, Boys & Girls Clubs team up to offer coding opportunities to kids, teens - Apple Newsroom

Technically, the next attempt to overthrow a national election may not qualify as a coup. It will rely on subversion more than violence, although each will have its place. If the plot succeeds, the ballots cast by American voters will not decide the presidency in 2024. Thousands of votes will be thrown away, or millions, to produce the required effect. The winner will be declared the loser. The loser will be certified president-elect.

Check out the full table of contents and find your next story to read.

The prospect of this democratic collapse is not remote. People with the motive to make it happen are manufacturing the means. Given the opportunity, they will act. They are acting already.

Who or what will safeguard our constitutional order is not apparent today. It is not even apparent who will try. Democrats, big and small D, are not behaving as if they believe the threat is real. Some of them, including President Joe Biden, have taken passing rhetorical notice, but their attention wanders. They are making a grievous mistake.

The democratic emergency is already here, Richard L. Hasen, a professor of law and political science at UC Irvine, told me in late October. Hasen prides himself on a judicious temperament. Only a year ago he was cautioning me against hyperbole. Now he speaks matter-of-factly about the death of our body politic. We face a serious risk that American democracy as we know it will come to an end in 2024, he said, but urgent action is not happening.

For more than a year now, with tacit and explicit support from their partys national leaders, state Republican operatives have been building an apparatus of election theft. Elected officials in Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and other states have studied Donald Trumps crusade to overturn the 2020 election. They have noted the points of failure and have taken concrete steps to avoid failure next time. Some of them have rewritten statutes to seize partisan control of decisions about which ballots to count and which to discard, which results to certify and which to reject. They are driving out or stripping power from election officials who refused to go along with the plot last November, aiming to replace them with exponents of the Big Lie. They are fine-tuning a legal argument that purports to allow state legislators to override the choice of the voters.

By way of foundation for all the rest, Trump and his party have convinced a dauntingly large number of Americans that the essential workings of democracy are corrupt, that made-up claims of fraud are true, that only cheating can thwart their victory at the polls, that tyranny has usurped their government, and that violence is a legitimate response.

Any Republican might benefit from these machinations, but lets not pretend theres any suspense. Unless biology intercedes, Donald Trump will seek and win the Republican nomination for president in 2024. The party is in his thrall. No opponent can break it and few will try. Neither will a setback outside politicsindictment, say, or a disastrous turn in businessprevent Trump from running. If anything, it will redouble his will to power.

As we near the anniversary of January 6, investigators are still unearthing the roots of the insurrection that sacked the Capitol and sent members of Congress fleeing for their lives. What we know already, and could not have known then, is that the chaos wrought on that day was integral to a coherent plan. In retrospect, the insurrection takes on the aspect of rehearsal.

Even in defeat, Trump has gained strength for a second attempt to seize office, should he need to, after the polls close on November 5, 2024. It may appear otherwiseafter all, he no longer commands the executive branch, which he tried and mostly failed to enlist in his first coup attempt. Yet the balance of power is shifting his way in arenas that matter more.

Trump is successfully shaping the narrative of the insurrection in the only political ecosystem that matters to him. The immediate shock of the event, which briefly led some senior Republicans to break with him, has given way to a near-unanimous embrace. Virtually no one a year ago, certainly not I, predicted that Trump could compel the whole partys genuflection to the Big Lie and the recasting of insurgents as martyrs. Today the few GOP dissenters are being cast out. 2 down, 8 to go! Trump gloated at the retirement announcement of Representative Adam Kinzinger, one of 10 House Republicans to vote for his second impeachment.

From the November 2020 issue: Barton Gellman on the election that could break America

Trump has reconquered his party by setting its base on fire. Tens of millions of Americans perceive their world through black clouds of his smoke. His deepest source of strength is the bitter grievance of Republican voters that they lost the White House, and are losing their country, to alien forces with no legitimate claim to power. This is not some transient or loosely committed population. Trump has built the first American mass political movement in the past century that is ready to fight by any means necessary, including bloodshed, for its cause.

At the edge of the Capitol grounds, just west of the reflecting pool, a striking figure stands in spit-shined shoes and a 10-button uniform coat. He is 6 foot 4, 61 years old, with chiseled good looks and an aura of command that is undimmed by retirement. Once, according to the silver bars on his collar, he held the rank of captain in the New York Fire Department. He is not supposed to wear the old uniform at political events, but he pays that rule no mind today. The uniform tells the world that he is a man of substance, a man who has saved lives and held authority. Richard C. Patterson needs every shred of that authority for this occasion. He has come to speak on behalf of an urgent cause. Pelosis political prisoners, he tells me, have been unjustly jailed.

Patterson is talking about the men and women held on criminal charges after invading the Capitol on January 6. He does not at all approve of the word insurrection.

It wasnt an insurrection, he says at a September 18 rally called Justice for January 6. None of our countrymen and -women who are currently being held are charged with insurrection. Theyre charged with misdemeanor charges.

Patterson is misinformed on that latter point. Of the more than 600 defendants, 78 are in custody when we speak. Most of those awaiting trial in jail are charged with serious crimes such as assault on a police officer, violence with a deadly weapon, conspiracy, or unlawful possession of firearms or explosives. Jeffrey McKellop of Virginia, for instance, is alleged to have hurled a flagpole like a spear into an officers face. (McKellop has pleaded not guilty.)

Patterson was not in Washington on January 6, but he is fluent in the revisionist narratives spread by fabulists and trolls on social media. He knows those stories verse by verse, the ones about January 6 and the ones about the election rigged against Trump. His convictions are worth examining because he and the millions of Americans who think as he does are the primary source of Trumps power to corrupt the next election. With a sufficient dose of truth serum, most Republican politicians would likely confess that Biden won in 2020, but the great mass of lumpen Trumpers, who believe the Big Lie with unshakable force, oblige them to pretend otherwise. Like so many others, Patterson is doing his best to parse a torrential flow of political information, and he is failing. His failures leave him, nearly always, with the worldview expounded by Trump.

We fall into a long conversation in the sweltering heat, then continue it for weeks by phone and email. I want to plumb the depths of his beliefs, and understand what lies behind his commitment to them. He is prepared to grant me the status of fellow truth-seeker.

The Stop the Steal rally for election integrity was peaceful, he says. I think the big takeaway is when Old Glory made its way into the Rotunda on January 6, our fearless public officials dove for cover at the sight of the American flag.

What about the violence? The crowds battling police?

The police were seen on video in uniform allowing people past the bicycle-rack barricades and into the building, he replies. I mean, thats established. The unarmed crowd did not overpower the officers in body armor. That doesnt happen. They were allowed in.

Surely he has seen other video, though. Shaky, handheld footage, taken by the rioters themselves, of police officers falling under blows from a baseball bat, a hockey stick, a fire extinguisher, a length of pipe. A crowd crushing Officer Daniel Hodges in a doorway, shouting Heave! Ho!

Does Patterson know that January 6 was among the worst days for law-enforcement casualties since September 11, 2001? That at least 151 officers from the Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department suffered injuries, including broken bones, concussions, chemical burns, and a Taser-induced heart attack?

Patterson has not heard these things. Abruptly, he shifts gears. Maybe there was violence, but the patriots were not to blame.

There were people there deliberately to make it look worse than what it was, he explains. A handful of ill-behaved, potentially, possibly agents provocateur. He repeats the phrase: Agents provocateur, I have on information, were in the crowd They were there for nefarious means. Doing the bidding of whom? I have no idea.

On information? I ask. What information?

You can look up this name, he says. Retired three-star Air Force General McInerney. You got to find him on Rumble. They took him off YouTube.

Sure enough, there on Rumble (and still on YouTube) I find a video of Lieutenant General Thomas G. McInerney, 84, three decades gone from the Air Force. His story takes a long time to tell, because the plot includes an Italian satellite and Pakistans intelligence service and former FBI Director James Comey selling secret U.S. cyberweapons to China. Eventually it emerges that Special Forces mixed with antifa combined to invade the seat of Congress on January 6 and then blame the invasion on Trump supporters, with the collusion of Senators Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell, along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

In a further wrinkle, Pelosi, by McInerneys account, became frantic soon afterward when she discovered that her own false-flag operation had captured a laptop filled with evidence of her treason. McInerney had just come from the White House, he says in his monologue, recorded two days after the Capitol riot. Trump was about to release the Pelosi evidence. McInerney had seen the laptop with his own eyes.

It shook me that Patterson took this video for proof. If my house had caught fire 10 years before, my life might have depended on his discernment and clarity of thought. He was an Eagle Scout. He earned a college degree. He keeps current on the news. And yet he has wandered off from the empirical world, placing his faith in fantastic tales that lack any basis in fact or explicable logic.

McInerneys tale had spread widely on Facebook, Twitter, Parler, and propaganda sites like We Love Trump and InfoWars. It joined the January 6 denialist canon and lodged firmly in Pattersons head. I reached the general by phone and asked about evidence for his claims. He mentioned a source, whose name he couldnt reveal, who had heard some people saying We are playing antifa today. McInerney believed they were special operators because they looked like SOF people. He believed that one of them had Pelosis laptop, because his source had seen something bulky and square under the suspects raincoat. He conceded that even if it was a laptop, he couldnt know whose it was or what was on it. For most of his story, McInerney did not even claim to have proof. He was putting two and two together. It stood to reason. In truth, prosecutors had caught and charged a neo-Nazi sympathizer who had videotaped herself taking the laptop from Pelosis office and bragged about it on Discord. She was a home health aide, not a special operator. (As of this writing, she has not yet entered a plea.)

The generals son, Thomas G. McInerney Jr., a technology investor, learned that I had been talking with his father and asked for a private word with me. He was torn between conflicting obligations of filial loyalty, and took a while to figure out what he wanted to say.

He has a distinguished service record, he told me after an otherwise off-the-record conversation. He wants whats best for the nation and he speaks with a sense of authority, but I have concerns at his age that his judgment is impaired. The older hes gotten, the stranger things have gotten in terms of what hes saying.

I tell all of this and more to Patterson. McInerney, the Military Times reported, went off the rails after a successful Air Force career. For a while during the Obama years he was a prominent birther and appeared a lot on Fox News, before being fired as a Fox commentator in 2018 for making a baseless claim about John McCain. Last November, he told the WVW Broadcast Network that the CIA operated a computer-server farm in Germany that had helped rig the presidential vote for Biden, and that five Special Forces soldiers had just died trying to seize the evidence. The Army and U.S. Special Operations Command put out dutiful statements that no such mission and no such casualties had taken place.

Of course, Patterson wrote to me sarcastically, governments would NEVER lie to their OWN citizens. He did not trust the Pentagons denials. There are seldom words or time enough to lay a conspiracy theory to rest. Each rebuttal is met with a fresh round of delusions.

Patterson is admirably eager for a civil exchange of views. He portrays himself as a man who may be wrong, and if I am I admit it, and he does indeed concede on small points. But a deep rage seems to fuel his convictions. I asked him the first time we met if we could talk about whats happening in the country, not the election itself.

His smile faded. His voice rose.

There aint no fucking way we are letting go of 3 November 2020, he said. That is not going to fucking happen. Thats not happening. This motherfucker was stolen. The world knows this bumbling, senile, career corrupt fuck squatting in our White House did not get 81 million votes.

He had many proofs. All he really needed, though, was arithmetic. The record indicates 141 [million] of us were registered to vote and cast a ballot on November 3, he said. Trump is credited with 74 million votes out of 141 million. That leaves 67 million for Joe; that doesnt leave any more than that. Where do these 14 million votes come from?

Patterson did not recall where he had heard those figures. He did not think he had read Gateway Pundit, which was the first site to advance the garbled statistics. Possibly he saw Trump amplify the claim on Twitter or television, or some other stop along the storys cascading route across the right-wing mediaverse. Reuters did a good job debunking the phony math, which got the total number of voters wrong.

I was interested in something else: the worldview that guided Patterson through the statistics. It appeared to him (incorrectly) that not enough votes had been cast to account for the official results. Patterson assumed that only fraud could explain the discrepancy, that all of Trumps votes were valid, and that the invalid votes must therefore belong to Biden.

Why dont you say Joe Biden got 81 million and theres only 60 million left for Trump? I asked.

Patterson was astonished.

Its not disputed, the 74 million vote count that was credited to President Trumps reelection effort, he replied, baffled at my ignorance. Its not in dispute Have you heard that President Trump engaged in cheating and fraudulent practices and crooked machines?

Biden was the one accused of rigging the vote. Everybody said so. And for reasons unspoken, Patterson wanted to be carried away by that story.

Robert A. Pape, a well-credentialed connoisseur of political violence, watched the mob attack the Capitol on a television at home on January 6. A name came unbidden to his mind: Slobodan Miloevi.

Back in June 1989, Pape had been a postdoctoral fellow in political science when the late president of Serbia delivered a notorious speech. Miloevi compared Muslims in the former Yugoslavia to Ottomans who had enslaved the Serbs six centuries before. He fomented years of genocidal war that destroyed the hope for a multiethnic democracy, casting Serbs as defenders against a Muslim onslaught on European culture, religion, and European society in general.

By the time Trump unleashed the angry crowd on Congress, Pape, who is 61, had become a leading scholar on the intersection of warfare and politics. He saw an essential similarity between Miloevi and Trumpone that suggested disturbing hypotheses about Trumps most fervent supporters. Pape, who directs the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats, or CPOST, called a staff meeting two days after the Capitol attack. I talked to my research team and told them we were going to reorient everything we were doing, he told me.

Miloevi, Pape said, inspired bloodshed by appealing to fears that Serbs were losing their dominant place to upstart minorities. What he is arguing in the 1989 speech is that Muslims in Kosovo and generally throughout the former Yugoslavia are essentially waging genocide on the Serbs, Pape said. And really, he doesnt use the word replaced. But this is what the modern term would be.

Pape was alluding to a theory called the Great Replacement. The term itself has its origins in Europe. But the theory is the latest incarnation of a racist trope that dates back to Reconstruction in the United States. Replacement ideology holds that a hidden hand (often imagined as Jewish) is encouraging the invasion of nonwhite immigrants, and the rise of nonwhite citizens, to take power from white Christian people of European stock. When white supremacists marched with torches in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, they chanted, Jews will not replace us!

Trump borrowed periodically from the rhetorical canon of replacement. His remarks on January 6 were more disciplined than usual for a president who typically spoke in tangents and unfinished thoughts. Pape shared with me an analysis he had made of the text that Trump read from his prompter.

Our country has been under siege for a long time, far longer than this four-year period, Trump told the crowd. Youre the real people. Youre the people that built this nation. He famously added, And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you dont fight like hell, youre not going to have a country anymore.

Just like Miloevi, Trump had skillfully deployed three classic themes of mobilization to violence, Pape wrote: The survival of a way of life is at stake. The fate of the nation is being determined now. Only genuine brave patriots can save the country.

Watching how the Great Replacement message was resonating with Trump supporters, Pape and his colleagues suspected that the bloodshed on January 6 might augur something more than an aberrant moment in American politics. The prevailing framework for analyzing extremist violence in the U.S., they thought, might not be adequate to explain what was happening.

When the Biden administration published a new homeland-security strategy in June, it described the assault on the Capitol as a product of domestic violent extremists, and invoked an intelligence assessment that said attacks by such extremists come primarily from lone wolves or small cells. Pape and his colleagues doubted that this captured what had happened on January 6. They set about seeking systematic answers to two basic questions: Who were the insurgents, in demographic terms? And what political beliefs animated them and their sympathizers?

Papes three-bedroom house, half an hours drive south of Chicago, became the pandemic headquarters of a virtual group of seven research professionals, supported by two dozen University of Chicago undergraduates. The CPOST researchers gathered court documents, public records, and news reports to compile a group profile of the insurgents.

The thing that got our attention first was the age, Pape said. He had been studying violent political extremists in the United States, Europe, and the Middle East for decades. Consistently, around the world, they tended to be in their 20s and early 30s. Among the January 6 insurgents, the median age was 41.8. That was wildly atypical.

Then there were economic anomalies. Over the previous decade, one in four violent extremists arrested by the FBI had been unemployed. But only 7 percent of the January 6 insurgents were jobless, and more than half of the group had a white-collar job or owned their own business. There were doctors, architects, a Google field-operations specialist, the CEO of a marketing firm, a State Department official. The last time America saw middle-class whites involved in violence was the expansion of the second KKK in the 1920s, Pape told me.

Yet these insurgents were not, by and large, affiliated with known extremist groups. Several dozen did have connections with the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, or the Three Percenters militia, but a larger numbersix out of every seven who were charged with crimeshad no ties like that at all.

Kathleen Belew, a University of Chicago historian and co-editor of A Field Guide to White Supremacy, says it is no surprise that extremist groups were in the minority. January 6 wasnt designed as a mass-casualty attack, but rather as a recruitment action aimed at mobilizing the general population, she told me. For radicalized Trump supporters I think it was a protest event that became something bigger.

Papes team mapped the insurgents by home county and ran statistical analyses looking for patterns that might help explain their behavior. The findings were counterintuitive. Counties won by Trump in the 2020 election were less likely than counties won by Biden to send an insurrectionist to the Capitol. The higher Trumps share of votes in a county, in fact, the lower the probability that insurgents lived there. Why would that be? Likewise, the more rural the county, the fewer the insurgents. The researchers tried a hypothesis: Insurgents might be more likely to come from counties where white household income was dropping. Not so. Household income made no difference at all.

Only one meaningful correlation emerged. Other things being equal, insurgents were much more likely to come from a county where the white share of the population was in decline. For every one-point drop in a countys percentage of non-Hispanic whites from 2015 to 2019, the likelihood of an insurgent hailing from that county increased by 25 percent. This was a strong link, and it held up in every state.

Trump and some of his most vocal allies, Tucker Carlson of Fox News notably among them, had taught supporters to fear that Black and brown people were coming to replace them. According to the latest census projections, white Americans will become a minority, nationally, in 2045. The insurgents could see their majority status slipping before their eyes.

The CPOST team decided to run a national opinion survey in March, based on themes it had gleaned from the social-media posts of insurgents and the statements theyd made to the FBI under questioning. The researchers first looked to identify people who said they dont trust the election results and were prepared to join a protest even if I thought the protest might turn violent. The survey found that 4 percent of Americans agreed with both statements, a relatively small fraction that nonetheless corresponds to 10 million American adults.

In June, the researchers sharpened the questions. This brought another surprise. In the new poll, they looked for people who not only distrusted the election results but agreed with the stark assertion that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president. And instead of asking whether survey subjects would join a protest that might turn violent, they looked for people who affirmed that the use of force is justified to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.

Pollsters ordinarily expect survey respondents to give less support to more transgressive language. The more you asked pointed questions about violence, the more you should be getting social-desirability bias, where people are just more reluctant, Pape told me.

Here, the opposite happened: the more extreme the sentiments, the greater the number of respondents who endorsed them. In the June results, just over 8 percent agreed that Biden was illegitimate and that violence was justified to restore Trump to the White House. That corresponds to 21 million American adults. Pape called them committed insurrectionists. (An unrelated Public Religion Research Institute survey on November 1 found that an even larger proportion of Americans, 12 percent, believed both that the election had been stolen from Trump and that true American patriots may have to resort to violence in order to save our country.)

Why such a large increase? Pape believed that Trump supporters simply preferred the harsher language, but we cannot rule out that attitudes hardened between the first and second surveys. Either interpretation is troubling. The latter, Pape said, would be even more concerning since over time we would normally think passions would cool.

In the CPOST polls, only one other statement won overwhelming support among the 21 million committed insurrectionists. Almost two-thirds of them agreed that African American people or Hispanic people in our country will eventually have more rights than whites. Slicing the data another way: Respondents who believed in the Great Replacement theory, regardless of their views on anything else, were nearly four times as likely as those who did not to support the violent removal of the president.

The committed insurrectionists, Pape judged, were genuinely dangerous. There were not many militia members among them, but more than one in four said the country needed groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. One-third of them owned guns, and 15 percent had served in the military. All had easy access to the organizing power of the internet.

What Pape was seeing in these results did not fit the government model of lone wolves and small groups of extremists. This really is a new, politically violent mass movement, he told me. This is collective political violence.

Pape drew an analogy to Northern Ireland in the late 1960s, at the dawn of the Troubles. In 1968, 13 percent of Catholics in Northern Ireland said that the use of force for Irish nationalism was justified, he said. The IRA was created shortly thereafter with only a few hundred members. Decades of bloody violence followed. And 13 percent support was more than enough, in those early years, to sustain it.

Its the communitys support that is creating a mantle of legitimacya mandate, if you would, that justifies the violence of a smaller, more committed group, Pape said. Im very concerned it could happen again, because what were seeing in our surveys is 21 million people in the United States who are essentially a mass of kindling or a mass of dry wood that, if married to a spark, could in fact ignite.

The story of Richard Patterson, once you delve into it, is consonant with Papes research. Trump appealed to him as an in-your-face, brash America First guy who has the interest of We the People. But there was more. Decades of personal and political grudges infuse Pattersons understanding of what counts as America and who counts as we.

Where Patterson lives, in the Bronx, there were 20,413 fewer non-Hispanic white people in the 2020 census than in 2010. The borough had reconfigured from 11 percent white to 9 percent.

Patterson came from Northern Irish stock and grew up in coastal Northern California. He was a lifetime C student who found ambition at age 14 when he began to hang around at a local fire station. As soon as he finished high school he took the test to join the Oakland fire department, earning, he said, outstanding scores.

But in those days, he recalled, Oakland was just beginning to diversify and hire females. So no job for the big white kid. The position went to this little woman who I know failed the test.

Patterson tried again in San Francisco, but found the department operating under a consent decree. Women and people of color, long excluded, had to be accepted in the incoming cohort. So, again, the big white kid is told, Fuck you, we got a whole fire department of guys that look just like you. We want the department to look different because diversity is all about an optic. The department could hire the Black applicant instead of myself.

Patterson bought a one-way ticket to New York, earned a bachelors degree in fire science, and won an offer to join New Yorks Bravest. But desegregation had come to New York, too, and Patterson found himself seething.

In 1982, a plaintiff named Brenda Berkman had won a lawsuit that opened the door to women in the FDNY. A few years later, the department scheduled training sessions to assist male firefighters in coming to terms with the assimilation of females into their ranks. Pattersons session did not go well. He was suspended without pay for 10 days after a judge found that he had called the trainer a scumbag and a Communist and chased him out of the room, yelling, Why dont you fuck Brenda Berkman and I hope you both die of AIDS. The judge found that the trainer had reasonably feared for his safety. Patterson continues to maintain his innocence.

Later, as a lieutenant, Patterson came across a line on a routine form that asked for his gender and ethnicity. He resented that. There was no box for Fuck off, so I wrote in Fuck off, he said. So they jammed me up for thatthis time a 30-day suspension without pay.

Even while Patterson rose through the ranks, he kept on finding examples of how the world was stacked against people like him. I look at the 2020 election as sort of an example on steroids of affirmative action. The straight white guy won, but it was stolen from him and given to somebody else.

Wait. Wasnt this a contest between two straight white guys?

Not really, Patterson said, pointing to Vice President Kamala Harris: Everybody touts the gal behind the president, who is currently, I think, illegitimately in our White House. It is, quote, a woman of color, like this is somelike this is supposed to mean something. And do not forget, he added, that Biden said, If you have a problem figuring out whether youre for me or Trump, then you aint Black.

What to do about all this injustice? Patterson did not want to say, but he alluded to an answer: Constitutionally, the head of the executive branch cant tell an American citizen what the fuck to do. Constitutionally, all the power rests with the people. Thats you and me, bro. And Mao is right that all the power emanates from the barrel of a gun.

Did he own a gun himself? My Second Amendment rights, like my medical history, are my own business, he replied.

Many of Pattersons fellow travelers at the Justice for January 6 protest were more direct about their intentions. One of them was a middle-aged man who gave his name as Phil. The former Coast Guard rescue diver from Kentucky had joined the crowd at the Capitol on January 6 but said he has not heard from law enforcement. Civil war is coming, he told me, and I would fight for my country.

Was he speaking metaphorically?

No, Im not, he said. Oh Lord, I think were heading for it. I dont think itll stop. I truly believe it. I believe the criminalsNancy Pelosi and her criminal cabal up thereis forcing a civil war. Theyre forcing the people who love the Constitution, who will give their lives to defend the Constitutionthe Democrats are forcing them to take up arms against them, and God help us all.

Gregory Dooner, who was selling flags at the protest, said he had been just outside the Capitol on January 6 as well. He used to sell ads for AT&T Advertising Solutions, and now, in retirement, he peddles MAGA gear: $10 for a small flag, $20 for a big one.

Violent political conflict, he told me, was inevitable, because Trumps opponents want actual war here in America. Thats what they want. He added a slogan of the Three Percenters militia: When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. The Declaration of Independence, which said something like that, was talking about King George III. If taken seriously today, the slogan calls for a war of liberation against the U.S. government.

Yo, heyhey, Dooner called out to a customer who had just unfurled one of his banners. I want to read him the flag.

He recited the words inscribed on the Stars and Stripes: A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.

George Washington wrote that, he said. Thats where were at, gentlemen.

I looked it up. George Washington did not write anything like that. The flag was Dooners best seller, even so.

Over the course of Trumps presidency, one of the running debates about the man boiled down to: menace or clown? Threat to the republic, or authoritarian wannabe who had no real chance of breaking democracys restraints? Many observers rejected the dichotomythe essayist Andrew Sullivan, for instance, described the former president as both farcical and deeply dangerous. But during the interregnum between November 3 and Inauguration Day, the political consensus leaned at first toward farce. Biden had won. Trump was breaking every norm by refusing to concede, but his made-up claims of fraud were getting him nowhere.

In a column headlined There Will Be No Trump Coup, the New York Times writer Ross Douthat had predicted, shortly before Election Day, that any attempt to cling to power illegitimately will be a theater of the absurd. He was responding in part to my warning in these pages that Trump could wreak great harm in such an attempt.

The Ticket podcast: Barton Gellman on how Trump could tamper with the 2020 vote

One year later, Douthat looked back. In scores of lawsuits, a variety of conservative lawyers delivered laughable arguments to skeptical judges and were ultimately swatted down, he wrote, and state election officials warded off Trumps corrupt demands. My own article, Douthat wrote, had anticipated what Trump tried to do. But at every level he was rebuffed, often embarrassingly, and by the end his plotting consisted of listening to charlatans and cranks proposing last-ditch ideas that could never succeed.

Follow this link:

How Donald Trump Could Subvert the 2024 Election - The Atlantic

A former Yakima resident who was involved in local politics is facing misdemeanor charges for illegal picketing, disorderly conduct and entering the U.S. Capitol building during the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Cell records obtained through a search warrant allege Lisa Anne Homer, 50, of Scottsdale, Ariz., was inside the Capitol for about an hour Jan. 6, according to an FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force report. The report said there was no evidence Homer destroyed any property or assaulted any law enforcement officers, though she moved extensively throughout the building for one hour, the report said. One of the four charges is entering and remaining in a restricted building.

A warrant was issued for her arrest Nov. 15, and she appeared in court Friday to answer the warrant in Colorado, she said. Homer was not detained and is scheduled to appear in court Thursday. The case is in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., under U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey.

Homer ran for a seat on the Yakima County Board of Commissioners as a Republican in 2018 but was eliminated in the primary.

Activity at the Capitol

Images taken from video segments show Homer marching toward the Capitol and standing at the front of the protest line, the report said. She was wearing a dark hoodie with a white American flag on the right sleeve and a white crossed rifle emblem on the left sleeve, dark pants, a green vest and a white knitted beanie.

Prior to entering the building, Homer donned goggles and a protective helmet and pulled up a gaiter that was around her neck, the report said.

She said she put on the helmet before entering the Capitol because she was shot with a rubber bullet and wanted to protect her head.

One image showed Homer participating in chanting led by a Proud Boy leader, William Billy Chrestman, the report said. Homer said she is not a member of the Proud Boys, a far-right group that is exclusively male, but she has connections across the country from her work in politics, she said.

A report from theFBI Joint Terrorism Task Force said this photo showsLisa Homer inside the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6 in Washington, D.C.

The report alleges she entered the building at about 2:13 p.m. through a damaged doorway and moved throughout the building for about an hour, walking through the Rotunda, the Senate wing and the crypt. She left the building at about 3:17, the report said.

Flight information included in the report showed Homer had arrived Washington, D.C., on Jan. 3 and departed on Jan. 8.

Arrest

Homer said FBI agents came to her home Nov. 23 in Arizona, but she was out of town, she said. She said the agents collected some items from her home and called her.

She is complying with the FBI, she said, and will appear in court Thursday.

A report from theFBI Joint Terrorism Task Force said this photo shows Lisa Homer inside the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6 in Washington, D.C.

I dont have any charges for aggression, thats not who I am, Homer said.

She opposed the inclusion of several images from her social media in the report, saying they had nothing to do with her activities in Washington, D.C.

One image taken from her social media and included in the report from Oct. 20, 2020, showed a man holding explosives with the caption Letsblowshitup.

She said the image was of her friend in Arizona who is trained in demolition and was hired to take down buildings or reservoirs.

It had nothing to do with D.C., she said.

Read more from the original source:

Former Yakima resident Lisa Homer charged with entering U.S. Capitol during Jan. 6 insurrection - Yakima Herald-Republic

When members of the far-right Proud Boys marched through Rockville Centre Saturday, waving "Dont Tread On Me" banners and American flags and flashing white power and "Heil Hitler" gestures, onlookers had every reason to be alarmed.

The groups messaging, as leaders often deny charges of racism even as members scorn and attack minorities, is confusion itself. And its relationship with neo-fascism is often purposely camouflaged, even as the Proud Boys loyalty to "Make America Great Again" is celebrated.

So why did this chapter of the Proud Boys, headquartered in St. James and designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, march in Rockville Centre last week, and Bay Shore and Patchogue last month?

For attention, mostly.

And why do we have to give these two dozen sad stragglers that attention?

Because this is a legitimate national hate group, openly admiring of and dedicated to violence. One leader, Jason Kessler, organized the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, that started out ugly and turned deadly. Two other national leaders, Ethan Nordean and Joseph Biggs, have been charged for their alleged planning and participation in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

The name "Proud Boys" derives from a puzzling anecdote from the groups founder, Gavin McInnes. He claims that upon hearing what he took to be a gay young man sing "Proud of Your Boy," from the stage version of "Aladdin," he decided that he and his brethren, who aspire to a hyper-macsuline pose, should claim the song for their own. McInnes is known for cofounding VICE Magazine, for his since-removed YouTube rant "10 Things I Hate about Jews," for declaring himself an "Islamophobe," and for saying, "I cannot recommend violence enough its a really effective way to solve problems."

Be the first to know who they are endorsing this election season.

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our privacy policy.

According to the Proud Boys placards, the group wants less government, no political correctness, no War on Drugs, closed borders, and an end to "racial guilt." Its platform includes "anti-racism," although members are frequently hateful toward Black and brown people. It also cites support for the First Amendment, although the group first gained fame trying to silence and intimidate those protesting police violence against Black people.

Proud Boys posters urge others to "Glorify the Entrepreneur," "Venerate the Housewife," and "Reinstate the Spirit of Western Chauvinism."

Whatever that means.

Full members must undergo an initiation that involves both taking a beating from other members and physically attacking opponents. That, and their laundry list of criminal exploits, makes them sound more like street toughs than a political organization, and members and leaders sometimes refer to the group as "a gang."

Even so, they are allowed to express themselves fully, to march and speak and debate, and it is through them doing so that we see the genius of that constitutional right.

Because the way a worthy nation deals with such poisonous and hateful messages is by giving groups like the Proud Boys every opportunity to explain themselves fully.

And then rejecting them.

MEMBERS OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD are experienced journalists who offer reasoned opinions, based on facts, to encourage informed debate about the issues facing our community.

Originally posted here:

Crave attention, earn rejection - Newsday

After the presidential election last year, the Proud Boys, a far-right group, declared its undying loyalty to President Trump.

In a Nov. 8 post in a private channel of the messaging app Telegram, the group urged its followers to attend protests against an election that it said had been fraudulently stolen from Mr. Trump. Hail Emperor Trump, the Proud Boys wrote.

But by this week, the groups attitude toward Mr. Trump had changed. Trump will go down as a total failure, the Proud Boys said in the same Telegram channel on Monday.

As Mr. Trump departed the White House on Wednesday, the Proud Boys, once among his staunchest supporters, have also started leaving his side. In dozens of conversations on social media sites like Gab and Telegram, members of the group have begun calling Mr. Trump a shill and extraordinarily weak, according to messages reviewed by The New York Times. They have also urged supporters to stop attending rallies and protests held for Mr. Trump or the Republican Party.

The comments are a startling turn for the Proud Boys, which for years had backed Mr. Trump and promoted political violence. Led by Enrique Tarrio, many of its thousands of members were such die-hard fans of Mr. Trump that they offered to serve as his private militia and celebrated after he told them in a presidential debate last year to stand back and stand by. On Jan. 6, some Proud Boys members stormed the U.S. Capitol.

But since then, discontent with Mr. Trump, who later condemned the violence, has boiled over. On social media, Proud Boys participants have complained about his willingness to leave office and said his disavowal of the Capitol rampage was an act of betrayal. And Mr. Trump, cut off on Facebook and Twitter, has been unable to talk directly to them to soothe their concerns or issue new rallying cries.

The Proud Boys anger toward Mr. Trump has heightened after he did nothing to help those in the group who face legal action for the Capitol violence. On Wednesday, a Proud Boy leader, Joseph Biggs, 37, was arrested in Florida and charged with unlawful entry and corruptly obstructing an official proceeding in the riot. At least four other members of the group also face charges stemming from the attack.

When Trump told them that if he left office, America would fall into an abyss, they believed him, Arieh Kovler, a political consultant and independent researcher in Israel who studies the far right, said of the Proud Boys. Now that he has left office, they believe he has both surrendered and failed to do his patriotic duty.

The shift raises questions about the strength of the support for Mr. Trump and suggests that pockets of his fan base are fracturing. Many of Mr. Trumps fans still falsely believe he was deprived of office, but other far-right groups such as the Oath Keepers, America First and the Three Percenters have also started criticizing him in private Telegram channels, according to a review of messages.

Last week, Nicholas Fuentes, the leader of America First, wrote in his Telegram channel that Mr. Trumps response to the Capitol rampage was very weak and flaccid and added, Not the same guy that ran in 2015.

Understandthe U.S. Capitol Riot

On Jan. 6, 2021, a pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol.

On Wednesday, the Proud Boys Telegram group welcomed President Biden to office. At least the incoming administration is honest about their intentions, the group wrote.

Mr. Kovler said the activity showed that groups that had coalesced around Mr. Trump were now trying to figure out their future direction. By losing his ability to post on Twitter and Facebook, Mr. Trump had also become less useful to the far-right groups, who counted on him to raise their profile on a national stage, Mr. Kovler said.

Mr. Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, could not be reached for comment. A spokesman for Mr. Trump did not respond to a request for comment.

The Proud Boys were founded in 2016 as a club for men by Gavin McInnes, who also was a founder of the online publication Vice. Describing themselves as Western chauvinists, the group attracted people who appeared eager to engage in violence and who frequently espoused anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic views. The group had supported Mr. Trump since he assumed office.

The change toward Mr. Trump happened slowly. After Novembers election, the groups private Telegram channels, Gab pages and posts on the alternative social networking site Parler were filled with calls to keep the faith with the president. Many Proud Boys, echoing Mr. Trumps falsehoods, said the election had been rigged, according to a review of messages.

The Proud Boys urged their members to attend Stop the Steal rallies. One Nov. 23 message on a Proud Boys Telegram page read, No Trump, no peace. The message linked to information about a rally in front of the governors home in Georgia.

As Mr. Trumps legal team battled the election result with lawsuits, the Proud Boys closely followed the court cases and appeals in different states, posting frequent links in their Telegram channels to news reports.

But when Mr. Trumps legal efforts failed, the Proud Boys called for him on social media to use his presidential powers to stay in office. Some urged him to declare martial law or take control by force. In the last two weeks of December, they pushed Mr. Trump in their protests and on social media to Cross the Rubicon.

They wanted to arm themselves and start a second civil war and take down the government on Trumps behalf, said Marc-Andr Argentino, a researcher who studies the far right and a Ph.D. candidate at Concordia University. But ultimately, he couldnt be the authoritarian they wanted him to be.

Then came the week of the Capitol storming. On Jan. 4, Mr. Tarrio was arrested by the Metropolitan Police on suspicion of burning a Black Lives Matter banner torn from a Black church in Washington. He was thrown out of the city by a judge the next day.

A key issue yet untested. Donald Trumps power as former president to keep information from his White House secret has become a central issue in the Houses investigation of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Amid an attempt byMr. Trumpto keep personal records secret and the indictment of Stephen K. Bannon for contempt of Congress, heres a breakdown of executive privilege:

What is executive privilege? It is a power claimed by presidents under the Constitution to prevent the other two branches of government from gaining access to certain internal executive branch information, especially confidential communications involving the president or among his top aides.

What is Trumps claim? Former President Trump has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the disclosure of White House files related to his actions and communications surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. He argues that these matters must remain a secret as a matter of executive privilege.

Is Trumps privilege claim valid? The constitutional line between a presidents secrecy powers and Congresss investigative authority is hazy. Though a judge rejected Mr. Trumps bid to keep his papers secret, it is likely that the case will ultimately be resolved by the Supreme Court.

Is executive privilege an absolute power? No. Even a legitimate claim of executive privilege may not always prevail in court. During the Watergate scandal in 1974, the Supreme Court upheld an orderrequiring President Richard M. Nixon to turn over his Oval Office tapes.

May ex-presidents invoke executive privilege? Yes, but courts may view their claims with less deference than those of current presidents. In 1977, the Supreme Court said Nixon could make a claim of executive privilege even though he was out of office, though the court ultimately ruled against him in the case.

Is Steve Bannon covered by executive privilege? This is unclear. Mr. Bannons case could raise the novel legal question of whether or how far a claim of executive privilege may extend to communications between a president and an informal adviser outside of the government.

What is contempt of Congress? It is a sanction imposed on people who defy congressional subpoenas. Congress can refer contempt citations to the Justice Department and ask for criminal charges. Mr. Bannon has been indicted on contempt chargesfor refusing to comply with a subpoena that seeks documents and testimony.

But nearly 100 other Proud Boys, who had been encouraged by leaders like Mr. Biggs, remained in Washington. According to court papers, Mr. Biggs told members to eschew their typical black-and-yellow polo shirts and instead go incognito and move about the city in smaller teams.

On the day of the riot, Mr. Biggs was captured in a video marching with a large group of Proud Boys toward the Capitol, chanting slogans like, Whose streets? Our streets.

Though prosecutors said Mr. Biggs was not among the first to break into the Capitol, they said he admitted to entering the building for a brief time. They also said he appeared to wear a walkie-talkie-style device on his chest, suggesting he was communicating with others during the incursion.

In an interview with The Times hours after the attack, Mr. Biggs said he and other Proud Boys arrived at the Capitol complex around 1 p.m. when the crowd in front of them surged and the mood grew violent. It literally happened in seconds, he said.

Prosecutors have also charged Dominic Pezzola, a Proud Boy from Rochester and a former Marine; Nicholas Ochs, founder of the Proud Boys Hawaii chapter; and Nicholas DeCarlo, who runs a news outfit called Murder the Media, which is associated with the group.

After the violence, the Proud Boys expected Mr. Trump who had earlier told his supporters to fight much harder against bad people to champion the mob, according to their social media messages. Instead, Mr. Trump began distancing himself from his remarks and released a video on Jan. 8 denouncing the violence.

The disappointment was immediately palpable. One Proud Boys Telegram channel posted: It really is important for us all to see how much Trump betrayed his supporters this week. We are nationalists 1st and always. Trump was just a man and as it turns out an extraordinarily weak one at the end.

Some Proud Boys became furious that Mr. Trump, who was impeached for inciting the insurrection, did not appear interested in issuing presidential pardons for their members who were arrested. In a Telegram post on Friday, they accused Mr. Trump of instigating the events at the Capitol, adding that he then washed his hands of it.

They thought they had his support and that, ultimately, Trump would come through for them, including with a pardon if they should need it, said Jared Holt, a visiting research fellow at the Atlantic Councils DFR Lab. Now they realize they went too far in the riots.

Some Proud Boys now say in online posts that the group should go dark and retreat from political life by cutting its affiliation to any political party. They are encouraging one another to focus their energies on secessionist movements and local protests.

To all demoralized Trump supporters: There is hope, read one message in a Proud Boys Telegram channel on Wednesday. There is an alternative. Abandon the GOP and the Dems.

See more here:

A Total Failure: The Proud Boys Now Mock Trump - The New ...

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol named the leaders of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys in a new round of subpoenas issued Tuesday.

The panel is demanding documents and testimony from Proud Boys Chairman Henry Enrique Tarrio and Oath Keepers President Elmer Stewart Rhodes for their alleged involvement in planning the storming of the Capitol.

We believe the individuals and organizations we subpoenaed today have relevant information about how violence erupted at the Capitol and the preparation leading up to this violent attack, said Rep. Bennie G. Thompson, the Mississippi Democrat who is chairman of the committee.

Mr. Tarrio was arrested in Washington on Jan. 4 on charges related to burning a Black Lives Matter banner outside of a church in December. He was barred from entering Washington on Jan. 6.

The committee alleges that Mr. Tarrio nevertheless was involved in the Proud Boys preparation for the events at the Capitol and noted that 34 members Proud Boys members have been charged in connection with entering the Capitol.

The committee said Mr. Rhodes conspired with at least 18 members of the Oath Keepers to storm the Capitol with paramilitary gear and supplies including firearms, tactical vests with plates, helmets and radio equipment. The panel said Mr. Rhodes in the individual identified as PERSON ONE in an indictment involving 18 Oath Keepers in which he is described as being in direct contact with the several members before, during, and shortly after the attack.

They also allege that Mr. Rhodes made remarks before Jan. 6 that suggest that the Oath Keepers were prepared to engage in violence to ensure their preferred election outcome.

The committee also subpoenaed Robert Patrick Lewis, chairman of the 1st Amendment Praetorian, for allegedly providing security at several rallies that amplified the former Presidents unsupported claim that the election was stolen leading up to Jan. 6. Mr. Lewis was also listed on a permit for a rally at Freedom Plaza on Jan. 5, according to the committee.

The committee pointed to Mr. Lewis Twitter posts in which he claimed Today is the day that true battles begin on Jan. 6. On Jan. 7, Mr. Lewis wrote he was involved in war gaming to continue efforts to overturn the election results, according to the committee.

The new subpoenas follow five subpoenas issued Monday for Trump ally Roger Stone and far-right radio host Alex Jones.

The Select Committee is moving swiftly to uncover the facts of what happened on that day and we expect every witness to comply with the law and cooperate so we can get answers to the American people, Mr. Thompson said.

Go here to read the rest:

Jan. 6 committee subpoenas leaders of Proud Boys, Oath ...