Category Archives: Offshore

(CNN) They stole six years of my life, and I committed no crime, writer Behrouz Boochani tells CNN from New Zealand, where he now lives.

He does not mince his words as he describes the impact of being detained as an asylum seeker on a remote island in Papua New Guinea by the Australian government.

Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

kAmx 42== :E E96 >249:?6 @7 G:@=6?46[ 96 D2JD]k^Am

kAmu=66:?8 A6CD64FE:@? 2D 2 zFC5 😕 xC2?[ q@@492?: >256 E96 EC62496C@FD ;@FC?6J 7C@> x?5@?6D:2 E@ pFDEC2=:2 3J 3@2E 😕 a_`b] pE E96 E:>6[ F?56C pFDEC2=:2D A@=:4J @7 @77D9@C6 56E6?E:@?[ 2DJ=F> D66<6CD H6C6 D6?E E@ }2FCF 2?5 !2AF2 }6H vF:?62[ H96C6 E96J H6C6 96=5 H9:=6 E96:C 4=2:>D H6C6 AC@46DD65] %96J H6C6 E@=5 E96J H@F=5 ?6G6C D6EE=6 😕 pFDEC2=:2] q@@492?: H2D 6G6?EF2==J 23=6 E@ 6D42A6 27E6C 36:?8 7=@H? E@ }6H +62=2?5 7@C 2 =:E6C2CJ 76DE:G2= E@ DA62< 23@FE 2? k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^a_`h^_`^b`^2FDEC2=:2^>2?FD2DJ=F>D66<6C=:E6C2CJAC:K6D4=::?E=^:?56I]9E>=Qm2H2C5H:??:?8 3@@< 96 HC@E6k^2m 5FC:?8 9:D E:>6 😕 56E6?E:@?j 96 H2D 8C2?E65 C67F866 DE2EFD E96C6]k^Am

kAm$F446DD:G6 pFDEC2=:2? 8@G6C?>6?ED 92G6 5676?565 E96:C A@=:4J 2D ?646DD2CJ E@ 56E6C EC277:4<6CD H9@ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^a_ab^_e^ad^2FDEC2=:2^2FDEC2=:22::>286DC67F866DE@C:6D:?E=9?<5DE^:?56I]9E>=Qm6IA=@:E 56DA6C2E6 2DJ=F> D66<6CDk^2m H:E9 AC@>:D6D @7 7C665@> 7@C E96 4@DE @7 2 3@2E EC:A] %96J 4=2:> :E D2G6D =:G6D E92E @E96CH:D6 >:89E 36 =@DE 2E D62]k^Am

kAm|@DE272 pK:>:E232C 2 9F>2? C:89ED 24E:G:DE 2?5 zFC5 7=65 xC2? 😕 a_`b 2?5 H2D 2=D@ D6?E E@ !}vD |2?FD xD=2?5[ H96C6 96 DA6?E D:I2?5292=7 J62CD] w6 H2D =2E6C >65:42==J 6G24F2E65 E@ E96 pFDEC2=:2? 4:EJ @7 |6=3@FC?6[ H96C6 96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^a_a_^`a^a_^2FDEC2=:2^2FDEC2=:2C67F866G:D2D:?E=5DE9?<^:?56I]9E>=QmC6>2:?65 😕 56E6?E:@? 😕 2 9@E6=k^2m 7@C 2?@E96C `g >@?E9D]k^Am

kAmxE H2D E96 >@DE 9@CC:3=6 A=246 😕 E96 H@C=5] tG6CJE9:?8 H2D E6CC:3=6] &?9J8:6?:4] }@E D276 2E 2== :?D:56 2 E:?J :D=2?5 2?5 2C@F?5 FD[ 9F?5C65D @7 @77:46CD[ 76?46D[ 492:?D[ 92?54F77D[ pK:>:E232C D2:5]k^Am

kAm}@H 7C66[ E96D6 DFCG:G@CD @7 pFDEC2=:2D @77D9@C6 AC@46DD:?8 DJDE6> 762C E96:C 6IA6C:6?46 4@F=5 36 C6A=:42E65 7@C C67F866D 2?5 2DJ=F> D66<6CD ECJ:?8 E@ C6249 E96 &?:E65 z:?85@>[ 2D :ED 8@G6C?>6?E D666 2DJ=F> D66<6CD 2?5 C67F866D E@ 36 AC@46DD65 :? #H2?52]k^Am

kAm%96 &zD $276EJ @7 #H2?52 q:== 😀 5F6 E@ 36 G@E65 @? 282:? 3J =2H>2<6CD :? E96 w@FD6 @7 r@>>@?D @? |@?52J 367@C6 8@:?8 324< E@ E96 w@FD6 @7 {@C5D[ H9:49 92D D@F89E E@ >2<6 46CE2:? 492?86D E@ D2768F2C5 2DJ=F> D66<6CD C:89ED]k^Am

kAm(92E x D66 C:89E ?@H 😀 92AA6?:?8 7@C C67F866D 😕 t?8=2?5 😀 6I24E=J H92E 92AA6?65 E@ >6[ pK:>:E232C E@=5 r}}]k^Am

kAmxED 962CE3C62<:?8 9@H E96J 2C6 8@:?8 E@ A2DD E96 =2H 2?5 6I:=6 2 =@E @7 :??@46?E A6@A=6 H9@ 6D42A65 7C@> H2C 2?5 A6CD64FE:@?[ 96 D2:5]k^Am

kAms6DA:E6 4C:E:4:D> 7C@> 9F>2? C:89ED 3@5:6D[ pFDEC2=:2 92D ?@E DE@AA65 :ED @77D9@C6 AC@46DD:?8 A@=:4J] p=E9@F89 E96 |2?FD xD=2?5 56E6?E:@? 46?E6C 4=@D65 😕 ~4E@36C a_`f[E96 46?E6C @? }2FCF C6>2:?D @A6C2E:@?2=] s2E2 7C@> pFDEC2=:2D s6A2CE>6?E @7 w@>6 p772:CD D9@HD E92E 2D @7 b` |2C49 a_ac[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]9@>62772:CD]8@G]2F^23@FEFDDF3D:E6^7:=6D^A@AF=2E:@??F>36CC6D6EE=65b`>2Ca_ac]A57Qmdc A6@A=6 2C6 😕 :>>:8C2E:@? 56E6?E:@? @? E96 :D=2?5]k^2mk^Am

kAm%96 A@=:4J 6?;@JD 3:A2CE:D2? A@=:E:42= DFAA@CE 😕 pFDEC2=:2[ H:E9 3@E9 E96 4@2=:E:@? 2?5 {23@C 8@G6C?>6?ED 324<:?8 @77D9@C6 56E6?E:@?]#67F866 2?5 2DJ=F> D66<6C :DDF6D C2?<65 =2DE :? 2 =:DE @7 :>A@CE2?E :DDF6D 😕 E96 a_aa 7656C2= 6=64E:@?[ 244@C5:?8 E@ 2k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2FDEC2=:2?6=64E:@?DEF5J]@C8^HA4@?E6?E^FA=@25D^%C6?5D:?pFDEC2=:2?!@=:E:42=~A:?:@?#6DF=ED7C@>E96pFDEC2=:2?t=64E:@?$EF5J`hgfa_aa]A57QmA@DEG@E6 DFCG6Jk^2m4:E65 3J E96k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]C67F8664@F?4:=]@C8]2F^a_aa2FDEC2=:2?6=64E:@?DEF5J^Qm#67F866 r@F?4:= @7 pFDEC2=:2k^2m]k^Am

k9am$E@A E96 q@2ED D=@82? C6>:?:D46?E @7 pFDEC2=:2D A@=:4Jk^9am

kAm!:E49:?8 E96 r@?D6CG2E:G6 8@G6C?>6?ED 3:== E@ E96 qC:E:D9 AF3=:4 😕 a_ab[ !C:>6 |:?:DE6C #:D9: $F?2< 564=2C65 9:D 8@G6C?>6?E H@F=5 DE@A E96 3@2ED >62?:?8 :E H@F=5 56E6C A6@A=6 7C@> 4C@DD:?8 E96 t?8=:D9 r92??6= :==682==J 😕 D>2== 3@2ED[ =2C86=J CF? 3J 4C:>:?2= EC277:4<:?8 82?8D[ 2?5 4=2:>:?8 2DJ=F> @?46 😕 qC:E2:?]k^Am

kAm%96 E9C66H@C5 D=@82? H2D E96 D2>6 @?6 E@FE65 5FC:?8 pFDEC2=:2D a_`b 6=64E:@? 42>A2:8? 3J %@?J p33@EE[ F=E:>2E6=J 4C65:E65 H:E9 96=A:?8 9:> H:? E96 32EE=6 E@ 36 AC:>6 >:?:DE6C]k^Am

kAmp?5 @? 7246 G2=F6[ E96 &zD AC@A@D65 @77D9@C6 56E6?E:@? A@=:4J 7@==@HD 2 D:>:=2C >@56= E@ E92E @7 pFDEC2=:2]k^Am

kAm&?56C E96 #H2?52 3:==[>:8C2?ED H9@ 2CC:G6 😕 E96 &z 3J :CC68F=2C >62?D 42? 36 D6?E E@ E96 62DE p7C:42? ?2E:@?[ H96C6 E96J H:== k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]8@G]F<^8@G6C?>6?E^AF3=:42E:@?D^FA2CE?6CD9:A^FA2CE?6CD9:A2446DD:3=6QmC6>2:? H9:=6 E96:C 2DJ=F> 4=2:>D 2C6 AC@46DD65k^2m] x7 E96J 2C6 DF446DD7F=[ E96J H:== 36 8:G6? C67F866 DE2EFD 😕 #H2?52] x7 E96J 2C6 F?DF446DD7F=[ E96J H:== 36 23=6 E@ 2AA=J 7@C =62G6 E@ DE2J 😕 #H2?52 @? @E96C 8C@F?5D @C D66< 2DJ=F> 😕 2 D276 4@F?ECJ 6=D6H96C6]k^Am

kAm%96 &z A=2? H2D 7:CDE 2??@F?465 😕 pAC:= a_aa[ 3FE 92D DF776C65 ?F>6C@FD =682= 2?5 =68:D=2E:G6 D6E324 D66<6C 92D 366? D6?E 7C@> qC:E2:? E@ #H2?52] pFDEC2=:2D @H? @77D9@C6 56E6?E:@? A@=:4J 92D 366? 962G:=J 4C:E:4:K65 2?5 7C2F89E H:E9 4@?EC@G6CDJ 3FE DE:== D66>D E@ 6I6CE 4@?D:56C23=6 2AA62= 7@C D@>6 &z A@=:E:4:2?D]k^Am

kAmp=6I2?56C s@H?6C[ 2 7@C>6C pFDEC2=:2? 7@C6:8? >:?:DE6C H9@ 92D AF3=:4=J 25G@42E65 7@C @77D9@C6 AC@46DD:?8 46?E6CD[ H2D 2D<65 3J E96 qC:E:D9 8@G6C?>6?E E@ C6G:6H E96 &z q@C56C u@C46 😕 a_aa 2?5 DF3D6BF6?E=J k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]8@G]F<^8@G6C?>6?E^?6HD^:?56A6?56?EA2?6=2AA@:?E65E@@G6CD66A2CE?6CD9:AH:E9CH2?52Qm2AA@:?E65 E@ 2 A2?6=k^2m D6E FA E@ @G6CD66 E96 &zD A=2? E@ D6?5 >:8C2?ED E@ #H2?52] s@H?6C D6CG65 2D 7@C6:8? >:?:DE6C 😕 pFDEC2=:2 5FC:?8 :ED 7:CDE :E6C2E:@? @7 E96 !24:7:4 $@=FE:@?[ H96? E96 8@G6C?>6?E DE2CE65 56A@CE:?8 C67F866D E@ :D=2?5D]k^Am

kAmqFE 6>F=2E:?8 pFDEC2=:2D $E@A E96 q@2ED A@=:4J H:== ?@E 36 2D 62DJ 2D 4@AJ:?8 E96 E9C66H@C5 D=@82?[ A@=:4J 6IA6CED H2C?]k^Am

kAm%2>2C2 %F32<@G:4[ 2 =64EFC6C :? AF3=:4 A@=:4J 2E E96 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 |6=3@FC?6[ E@=5 r}} E92E 2? :?4C62D65 pFDEC2=:2? ?2G2= AC6D6?46[ 2?5 36EE6C C68:@?2= 4@@A6C2E:@? H:E9 ?6:893@FC:?8 4@F?EC:6D[ 2AA62C65 E@ 92G6 DE@AA65 A6@A=6 7C@> C6249:?8 E96 ?2E:@?D D9@C6D[ H:E9 E96 24EF2= 56E6CC6?E 67764E @7 E96 @77D9@C6 A@=:4J =6DD 4=62C] %96 &z[ D96 D2:5[ =246 C68:@?2= DFAA@CE]k^Am

kAmxED ?@E ?646DD2C:=J E96 24EF2= @77D9@C6 DJDE6> E92E H2D E96 <6J >6492?:D> E92E H@C<65 :? E9:D 42D6[ 3FE C2E96C 92G:?8 E92E AC6D6?46 2?5 92G:?8 A2CE?6CD 2?5 :?E6C=@4FE@CD :? x?5@?6D:2 E92E H6C6 23=6 E@ 2DD:DE E96 pFDEC2=:2? 8@G6C?>6?E E@ AC6G6?E A6@A=6 7C@> 2CC:G:?8[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

k9am$E@AA:?8 A6@A=6 D>F88=6CDk^9am

kAmp?@E96C 5:776C6?46 😀 @?6 @7 D42=6] x? a__`[ 367@C6 pFDEC2=:2 :>A=6>6?E65 @77D9@C6 AC@46DD:?8[ k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]2A9]8@G]2F^23@FE0A2C=:2>6?E^A2C=:2>6?E2CJ056A2CE>6?ED^A2C=:2>6?E2CJ0=:3C2CJ^AF3D^CA^CA`b`c^3@2E2CC:G2=DQmd[d`e C67F866D C624965 pFDEC2=:2D D9@C6D 3J 3@2Ek^2m]k^Am

kAmr@>A2C2E:G6=J[ E96 &z 8@G6C?>6?E k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]8@G]F<^8@G6C?>6?E^DE2E:DE:4D^:CC68F=2C>:8C2E:@?E@E96F:8C2E:@?E@E96F2?J>:8C2?EDH6C656E64E652CC:G:?8:?E96F2==3@2EDQmD2JDk^2m cc[ce_ A6@A=6 H6C6 56E64E65 2CC:G:?8 3J D>2== 3@2ED 36EH66? yF?6 a_aa 2?5 yF?6 a_ab 2=@?6[ C6AC6D6?E:?8 gdT @7 :CC68F=2C 2CC:G2=D] x? a_`g[ E96 ?F>36C @7 A6@A=6 56E64E65 4C@DD:?8 E96 t?8=:D9 r92??6= 😕 D>2== 3@2ED H2D @?=J ahh[ 244@C5:?8 E@ |:8C2E:@? ~3D6CG2E@CJ 2E E96 &?:G6CD:EJ @7 ~I7@C5[ 3FE D:?46 a_a_ E96 ?F>36C 92D 4=:>365 D92CA=J]k^Am

kAm%96 &z 8@G6C?>6?E :?D:DED :ED #H2?52 A=2? 😀 2:>65 2E 5:DCFAE:?8 A6@A=6D>F88=:?8 ?6EH@C:8C2?ED 7C@> >2<:?8 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^:?E6C24E:G6^a_ab^_f^F<^>:8C2?E4C@DD:?8D2:D>2==3@2ED^Qm52?86C@FD D62 ;@FC?6Jk^2m 24C@DD E96 3FDJ r92??6= 7C@> uC2?46]k^Am

kAmp?@E96C 5:776C6?46 36EH66? EH@ ?2E:@?D DE6>D 7C@> E96 724E pFDEC2=:2 5@6D ?@E 92G6 2 9F>2? C:89ED 492CE6C[ %F32<@G:4 D2:5] $96 ?@E6D E92E E96 &z :D DE:== 3@F?5 3J 9F>2? C:89ED @3=:82E:@?D[ A2CE:4F=2C=J 2D 2 D:8?2E@CJ E@ E96 tFC@A62? r@?G6?E:@? @? wF>2? #:89ED]k^Am

kAmx? yF?6 a_aa[ 2 =2DE>:?FE6 :?;F?4E:@? 7C@> E96 tFC@A62? r@FCE @7 wF>2? #:89ED k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^a_aa^_e^`c^F<^CH2?522DJ=F>7=:89EF<:?E=83C^:?56I]9E>=QmDE@AA65 2 A=2?6 42CCJ:?8 2DJ=F> D66<6CDk^2m 2?5 C67F866D 7C@> E2<:?8 @77 7@C #H2?52 5F6 E@ A@E6?E:2= 3C62496D @7 9F>2? C:89ED]k^Am

kAmx? }@G6>36C a_ab[ E96 &z $FAC6>6 r@FCE 7@F?5 E92E E96 A@=:4J @7 C6>@G:?8 :?5:G:5F2=D H9@ 6?E6C E96 &z H:E9@FE 2FE9@C:K2E:@? E@ #H2?52 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^a_ab^``^`d^F<^F64@FCECH2?52CF=:?883C:?E=^:?56I]9E>=QmH2D F?=2H7F=k^2m[ 7:?5:?8 E92E :E H2D ?@E 2 D276 56DE:?2E:@? 2?5 A6@A=6 H9@ 2C6 C6>@G65 7C@> E96 &z >:89E 36 D6?E @? E@ 7246 A6CD64FE:@? @C 9F>2? C:89ED 23FD6D 😕 2?@E96C 4@F?ECJ]k^Am

k9am%9:D A@=:4J C62==J 52>2865 A6@A=6k^9am

kAmp== E96D6 724E@CD 4@>6 367@C6 4@?D:56C:?8 E96 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]4??]4@>^a_ab^_h^_d^2FDEC2=:2^2FDEC2=:2?65<6==J6>6C2=5D56E2:?66:?E=9?<5DE^:?56I]9E>=Qm9F>2? :>A24Ek^2m @7 7@C465 C6=@42E:@? @? A6@A=6 2=C625J 7=66:?8 A6CD64FE:@?]k^Am

kAmpFDEC2=:2 92D 72465 DEC@?8 :?E6C?2E:@?2= 4C:E:4:D> @G6C :ED @77D9@C6 AC@46DD:?8 A@=:4J]k^Am

kAmq6EH66? a_`b 2?5 a_`f[ C67F866D 96=5 😕 :ED @77D9@C6 46?E6CD C6A@CE65 G:@=6?46[ 23FD6 2?5 2 =24< @7 2446DD E@ >65:42= 42C6] x? a_`d[ E96 &} $A64:2= #2AA@CE6FC @? %@CEFC6 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]@949C]@C8^6?^9C3@5:6D^9C4^C68F=2CD6DD:@?D^D6DD:@?ag^=:DEC6A@CEDQm7@F?5k^2m pFDEC2=:2 G:@=2E65 E96 C:89ED @7 2DJ=F> D66<6CD :?4=F5:?8 49:=5C6? E@ 36 7C66 7C@> E@CEFC6 @C 4CF6=[ :?9F>2? @C 568C25:?8 EC62E>6?E 5F6 E@ E96 4@?5:E:@?D E96J H6C6 6IA@D65 E@]k^Am

kAmp &} C:89ED 6IA6CE D2:5 😕 a_`e E92E E96 23FD6D F?4@G6C65 😕 pFDEC2=:2D @77D9@C6 56E6?E:@? 46?E6CD 925k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^HHH]@949C]@C8^6?^a_`e^``^2FDEC2=:2D9F>2?C:89EDC64@C53=6>:D965AF?:E:G62AAC@249>:8C2?EDF?C:89ED6IA6CEQm52>2865 E96 4@F?ECJD C6AFE2E:@? @? 9F>2? C:89EDk^2m] %96 &z 8@G6C?>6?E 92D 366? H2C?65 :E 4@F=5 7246 E96 D2>6 72E6 :7 E96 3:== 😀 A2DD65]k^Am

kAmp A2C=:2>6?E2CJ ;@:?E 4@>>:EE66 @? 9F>2? C:89ED k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^4@>>:EE66D]A2C=:2>6?E]F<^AF3=:42E:@?D^cbaha^5@4F>6?ED^a`ddbd^5672F=E^Qm7@F?5k^2m E96 q:== H@F=5 67764E:G6=J 8C2?E AF3=:4 2FE9@C:E:6D DE2EFE@CJ A6C>:DD:@? E@ 24E 😕 2 >2??6C E92E 😀 :?4@>A2E:3=6 H:E9 9F>2? C:89ED DE2?52C5D]k^Am

kAm%96 36DE E9:?8 7@C >6 E@ D2J 😀 E92E #H2?52?D 2C6 24EF2==J D66? 2D C67F866D 😕 2 =@E @7 4@F?EC:6D]%96JC6 566>65 2D 92G:?8 C67F866 DE2EFD 3642FD6 @7 E96 9F>2? C:89ED 23FD6D 😕 E96:C 4@F?ECJ] $@[ J@FC6 6DD6?E:2==J D6?5:?8 A6@A=6 E@ 2 4@F?ECJ H9@D6 @H? A6@A=6 2C6 C67F866D 😕 @E96C 4@F?EC:6D[ %F32<@G:4 D2JD]k^Am

kAmu@C E96:C A2CE[ 3@E9 q@@492?: 2?5 pK:>:E232C 92G6 2 4=62C >6DD286 7@C E96 &z =62C? 7C@> pFDEC2=:2D >:DE2<6D]k^Am

kAmx H2D E@CEFC65 7@C 6:89E J62CD] |6?E2==J 2?5 A9JD:42==J ~7 4@FCD6[ E96J WE96 &z 8@G6C?>6?EX 5@?E 42C6] %96J 2C6 7@==@H:?8 E96 D2>6 A@=:E:4:2?D E92E 9FCE >6] qFE >J >6DD286 E@ A6@A=6 😕 t?8=2?5 😀 A=62D6 C625 E96 DE@CJ @7 H92E 92AA6?65 E@ C67F866D 😕 |2?FD 2?5 }2FCF[ pK:>:E232C D2:5]k^Am

kAmu@C q@@492?:[ >2?J A6@A=6 D9@F=5 36 2H2C6 @7 :E] (92ED 92AA6?65 E96C6 2?5 9@H E96J 6DE23=:D965 E92E DJDE6>] x E9:?< E96 3:886DE E9:?8 23@FE |2?FD 2?5 }2FCF E92E A6@A=6 2=H2JD 7@C86E :D 32?:D9>6?E :ED6=7 H96? J@F 766= 2D 2 A6CD@?[ 2D 2 9F>2? 36:?8 H96? J@F 766= E92E J@F 2C6 32?:D965 x E9:?< E92E :D 2 9F86 2?5 566A G:@=6?46 :ED6=7]k^Am

kAm%9:D A@=:4J C62==J 52>2865 A6@A=6[ 96 D2:5]k^Am

kAm%96r}}(:C6k^Am

kAm U2>Aj a_ac r23=6 }6HD }6EH@C<[ x?4][ 2 (2C?6C qC@D] s:D4@G6CJ r@>A2?J] p== C:89ED C6D6CG65]k^Am

See the article here:

'Heart-breaking': Refugees once detained offshore by Australia warn the UK government not to push through its ... - The Albany Herald

Aker BP and its partners Equinor and Sval Energy have commenced production from the Hanz field in the Norwegian North Sea.

Located in production licence 028 B, the subsea field development is tied into the Ivar Aasen platform about 15km further south.

Discovered in 1997, the Hanz field holds estimated recoverable resources of 3.1 million standard cubic metres of oil equivalent, translating to approximately 19.65 million barrels of oil equivalent.

Aker BP said the development costs for the Hanz field are around Nkr5bn ($453m).

The project saw the repurposing of subsea production systems from the Jette field, a first for the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS).

This optimised solution has led to reduced power consumption, chemical use and seabed equipment.

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Your download email will arrive shortly

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

Country * UK USA Afghanistan land Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cte d"Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati North Korea South Korea Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Runion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates US Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam British Virgin Islands US Virgin Islands Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Kosovo

Industry * Academia & Education Aerospace, Defense & Security Agriculture Asset Management Automotive Banking & Payments Chemicals Construction Consumer Foodservice Government, trade bodies and NGOs Health & Fitness Hospitals & Healthcare HR, Staffing & Recruitment Insurance Investment Banking Legal Services Management Consulting Marketing & Advertising Media & Publishing Medical Devices Mining Oil & Gas Packaging Pharmaceuticals Power & Utilities Private Equity Real Estate Retail Sport Technology Telecom Transportation & Logistics Travel, Tourism & Hospitality Venture Capital

Tick here to opt out of curated industry news, reports, and event updates from Offshore Technology.

Submit and download

In addition to the technological advancements, the development strategy for Hanz included the implementation of a cross-flow well for water injection.

Aker BP CEO Karl Johnny Hersvik said: This is yet another great example of what we can achieve working as one team with our suppliers towards a common goal and with shared incentives. In addition, innovative solutions with reuse of infrastructure and use of [a] cross-flow well have contributed to lower costs and lower emissions.

Development of the Hanz discovery is important for the development of the Ivar Aasen area. Production start from Hanz in 2024 will help us maintain good production from the Ivar Aasen platform.

Aker BP, which owns a 35% stake in the field, leads the consortium as the operator of production licence 028 B. Equinor owns a 50% interest while Sval Energi holds the remaining 15% stake.

Aker BP Projects Edvard Grieg and Ivar Aasen vice-president Stine Kongshaug McIntosh said: This development solution will be more cost-efficient and have a smaller environmental footprint than originally planned for. This is in line with Aker BPs continuous search for improvements, where the goal is to produce with low costs and low emissions.

Give your business an edge with our leading industry insights.

Continue reading here:

Aker BP begins production from Hanz field offshore Norway - Offshore Technology

Wind turbine manufacturer Vestas has revealed plans to build a nacelle factory and a logistic base for offshore wind turbines in South Korea in partnership with A.P. Moller Maersk.

The plan, part of a wider agreement, is dependent on the pace of market growth and awarded volume for Vestas, the company said.

Other signatories to the agreement include South Koreas Jeonnam Province, and Mokpo City.

The factory and the logistics base will be located at the Mokpo New Port Hinterland Complex.

The partners aim to strengthen the local economy by potentially hiring local talent and collaborating with local companies.

Additionally, Jeonnam Province and Mokpo City will provide the necessary administrative and financial support to create a sustainable supply chain, Vestas said in a social media post.

For Maersk, this is a good step for project logistics in Asia Pacific and a key milestone in our integrator strategy of delivering end-to-end logistics solutions for our partners. We continue to strengthen our partnership with Vestas, which is based on a shared vision and our joint commitment to a green, sustainable future for our planet, said Maersk CEO, Vincent Clerc.

Vestas has already secured the status of the preferred wind turbine supplier for the 504 MW Ulsan Gray Whale 3 floating offshore wind farm, as well as the 390 MW Shinan Ui offshore wind farm, the 1.3 GW MunmuBaram floating wind farm, the 600 MW Wando Geumil wind farm, and an unnamed 495 MW project.

Vestas has also signed a Memorandum of Understanding with South Koreas Ulsan City, under which the turbine manufacturer, the City, Ulsan Port Authority, and Sejin Heavy Industries & Construction will cooperate on Ulsans ambition to develop a 9 GW floating offshore wind complex by 2030.

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

Original post:

Vestas and Maersk to Build Offshore Wind Hub in South Korea | Offshore Wind - Offshore WIND

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Read more:

Denmark launches its biggest offshore wind farm tender - The Caledonian-Record

Representation Image

Rising missile threats in the Pacific, particularly from China, have seemingly prompted the US Navy to launch an innovative yet contentious proposal to convert old oil rigs into mobile missile defence and resupply stations.

Gibbs & Cox, a Leidos company, disclosed the initiative at this years Sea Air Space expo in Washington, DC.

The Mobile Defense/Depot Platform notion is devised to convert oil platforms into huge floating island bases capable of functioning independently for over 12 months, positioned at an optimal distance from the shore.

The converted platforms are likely to play a dual role in boosting the US air defence capabilities or aiding in the strike missions, with the capacity to hold up to almost 512 vertical launch system (abbreviated as the VLS) cells or 100 huge missile launchers.

According to Naval News, the capability is approximately five times that of an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer.

Heruningtyas Desi Purnamasari, a US Navy official, summed up the strategic significance of such floating bases.

Desi noted that the platforms might conceivably significantly reduce the risks and costs related to land-based defence systems.

In addition, the concept outlines plans for mobile platforms to support the US Navys surface combatants and nuclear-powered submarines in Afloat Forward Staging Base configurations.

This would provide an affordable option at 10% of the cost of a brand-new Ballistic Missile Defense system.

However, the feasibility of these floating bases has long been debated.

In 2018, specialists Eviya Vitola and Jose Delgado also discussed the security and political challenges of developing semi-permanent offshore military bases, observing the high costs, vulnerability to missile attacks, and relative incompetence compared to traditional abilities.

Even more recently, Sam Tangredi, associated with the Foreign Policy Research Institute, pointed out the strategic benefits of sea bases, including enhanced joint command capabilities and rapid strike potential.

Tangredi further questioned if the new sea-basing tech can keep pace with the evolving anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) risks, indicating that while improvements in missile and air defences can help mitigate some of the dangers, the practicality of heavily investing in sea bases continues to be uncertain.

Such an ambitious project echoes a shift in the military strategy as the US adjusts to the new geopolitical realities and tech advancements in warfare, striving to bridge the gap between land- and sea-based BMD capabilities.

Reference: TOI

Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.

Disclaimer : The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

Marine Insight News Network is a premier source for up-to-date, comprehensive, and insightful coverage of the maritime industry. Dedicated to offering the latest news, trends, and analyses in shipping, marine technology, regulations, and global maritime affairs, Marine Insight News Network prides itself on delivering accurate, engaging, and relevant information.

Marine Insight News Network is a premier source for up-to-date, comprehensive, and insightful coverage of the maritime industry. Dedicated to offering the latest news, trends, and analyses in shipping, marine technology, regulations, and global maritime affairs, Marine Insight News Network prides itself on delivering accurate, engaging, and relevant information.

By subscribing, you agree to ourPrivacy Policyand may receive occasional deal communications; you can unsubscribe anytime.

See more here:

U.S. Navy To Convert Oil Rigs Into Offshore Military Bases To Counter China In The Pacific - Marine Insight

In a significant development for New York's renewable energy sector, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) has wrapped up its third offshore wind solicitation, marking both achievements and challenges in the state's ambitious green energy agenda.

Following the October 24, 2023 announcement, NYSERDA provisionally awarded contracts to three offshore wind projects, pending successful contract negotiations. These projects were poised to revolutionise New York's energy landscape:

- Attentive Energy One A collaboration between TotalEnergies, Rise Light & Power, and Corio Generation, this project aimed to generate 1,404 MW. - Community Offshore Wind Developed by RWE Offshore Renewables and National Grid Ventures, this project boasted a capacity of 1,314 MW. - Excelsior Wind Developed by Vineyard Offshore, this project also targeted a capacity of 1,314 MW.

Additionally, NYSERDA provisionally allocated $300 million of grant funding to GE Vernova and LM Wind Power for nacelle and blade manufacturing in New Yorks Capital Region, in conjunction with the awarded projects.

For more information about offshore wind farm projects across the globe, click here.

Read the original:

NYSERDA concludes New York's third offshore wind solicitation without final awards - 4C Offshore

As offshore wind turbines undergo construction in waters south of the Vineyard, and with some already standing and delivering power, the debates on the Island regarding the industry continue.

And amid the conversations over a necessity for clean energy, and whether the projects are a blow to the Vineyards natural charm coupled with a mix of online misinformation campaigns against the offshore wind industry one subject has remained submerged: undersea cables.

While cables which connect wind farms to the New England power grid on the mainland arent the flashiest parts of an offshore wind farm operation, some are nervous about what may lie ahead with them.

John Keene, president of the Marthas Vineyard Fishermens Preservation Trust, told the Times that some in the fishing industry are nervous about how the electromagnetic field from the cables can affect marine life.

Keene said the concern is that the fields emitted from cables could act like a fence, particularly for migratory species, and impact the behavior of marine species.

Theres a lot of unknowns, he said.

The worry also stems from how many cables would be in areas not far from the Vineyard, including a spot near Edgartown called Muskeget Channel. Seven cables are planned to go through one of the channels corridors.

The collective energy hasnt been met yet, Keene said regarding the number of cables that would be on the seafloor once the offshore wind farms planned south of the Island are completed.

There are nearly 10 offshore wind projects underway or proposed in seas south of the Vineyard, which have terms of around three decades per lease area.

Among the various offshore wind projects within 30 miles of the Vineyard, the 130-megawatt South Fork Wind project, located around 20 miles southwest of Marthas Vineyard, is the only one that has completed construction so far, and is delivering power through cables that come to shore in Long Island.

For Vineyard Wind 1, an over 800-megawatt, 62-turbine offshore wind farm in the works, overseen by Avingrid, the cables come close to Edgartown.

Vineyard Wind 1s 220-kilovolt undersea cable slithers over 15 miles through a corridor in Muskeget Channel before making landfall in Barnstable, partially passing through waters under Edgartown jurisdiction.

And its not the only undersea cable laid by Avangrid in the channel. The corridor, generally 3,800 feet in width, was previously widened by around 1,000 feet by developers for cable laying, and may be completely filled out by cables stemming from Avangrid projects, including a lease area for a proposed offshore wind operation collectively known as New England Wind.

An Avangrid press release touting the projects potential economic and environmental benefits to the region says that Park City Wind is returning as the 791-megawatt New England Wind 1 and Commonwealth Wind is coming back as the 1,080-megawatt New England Wind 2.

The cables for Vineyard Wind 1 and New England Wind projects are each around 11 inches in diameter, and will be, or currently are, buried five to eight feet below the sea floor. Despite the small amount of space the cables themselves would take up, Avangrid representatives and consultants have said that a large amount of space between 164 feet and 328 feet is needed between each cable to keep them from damaging one another, and for repair vessels.

The New England Wind 2 connector cable which consists of 275-kilovolt cables is currently under review by the Marthas Vineyard Commission. During a public hearing on April 11, the only public comments to the commission came from board members of Vineyard Power, a partner of Vineyard Wind.

Although commissioners have yet to make a final decision, there were questions whether the cable construction would affect marine life, and who would be liable if something went awry while laying the cables.

Even if the MVC approves the project, Avangrid will still have more steps ahead. Edgartown conservation assistant Kara Shemeth tells the Times the cable project would return to the towns conservation commission after undergoing MVC review.

And the approval process may not encounter smooth sailing with the Edgartown conservation commission. The conservation commission had denied permitting undersea cables for Vineyard Wind 1 and the former Park City Wind project, although the states Department of Environmental Protection ultimately reversed these decisions.

Both times, the conservation commission expressed concerns over potential environmental impacts from the cables. A representative of the Edgartown commission was not immediately available for comment.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) spokesperson Brian Walch told the Times that the agency works closely with tribes, government agencies, and a wide range of other ocean users to make sure offshore energy development is done in a responsible manner that would avoid or mitigate potential impacts to offshore environment and marine life.

As for the electromagnetic fields, Walch said that the cables are wrapped in sheathes that reduces the emission of these fields. Additionally, Walch said, the fields decay quickly with distance from cables, and burying them reduces potential exposure.

Regarding the impact on marine species, electromagnetic fields exist naturally in the ocean, but are also generated by other types of cables, like those for telecommunication. Additionally, the power company Eversource has undersea cables connecting the Island with the mainland for power distribution that make landfall in Tisbury, Oak Bluffs, and Falmouth.

BOEM also states that the alternating current from the offshore wind cables in Southern New England will generate weak EMF at frequencies outside the known range of detection by electrosensitive and magnetosensitive fishes.

Walch said while some species, like skates, sharks, and lobsters, are sensitive to electromagnetic fields, detrimental effects to populations are not expected.

Some marine species are observed to respond to EMF, but the fields do not negatively impact their movement, Walch said.

Developers for the New England Wind 2 connector cable project also said there would be no permanent changes caused by the construction. However, laying the cables may require dredging more than 100,000 cubic yards of sand, which may kill some shellfish, like surf clams and young blue mussels. MVC staff stated during the meetings it could take up to four years for the affected sea life to recover and recolonize, depending on the seafloor composition. Maritime navigation and fishing activities near the cable-laying area will also likely be impacted while construction takes place.

Island commercial fisherman Wes Brighton told the Times that the number of undersea cables would be an unprecedented amount for the waters near the Vineyard, adding it may be too early to tell exactly how local waters will be impacted.

To speculate as to what the impacts and the damages are, theres no empirical data that you can be sure of what the outcome is, so its very problematic from a mitigation perspective, he said, adding he feels the potential impact could be catastrophic.

But Brighton also said this remains uncertain until more time has passed observing the areas for changes. He will be on notice during the upcoming commercial conch and squid seasons, after the cables have been laid.

The connector cable project representatives also stated there would be no damages to undersea archaeological sites, a concern The Times has heard from the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) before. Walch said BOEM encourages developers to avoid or minimize impacting underwater cultural resources, and the agency consults tribal nations on a government-to-government basis for input about sites of significance.

Walch noted that BOEM requires developers to follow their procedures to preserve submerged archaeological sites and cultural resources during construction, and to add buffers around these areas.

Also, protocols are in place for ceasing construction in the vicinity of an unanticipated archaeological discovery, as well as for notifying BOEM for the discovery immediately, Walch said.

Avangrid-owned cables arent the only ones that may be coming close to the Vineyard. While SouthCoast Wind is proposing a cable that runs south of Nomans Land and making landfall in Somerset, another cable proposed for its second phase could be connected in Falmouth, with a cable route that would run even closer to the Island than Vineyard Wind 1s cable.

While fishermen have been appreciative of Vineyard Wind coordinating before construction, some are unsure whether other companies with projects south of the Island would be as proactive.

Each company handles how they do outreach differently, Keene said, pointing out that various projects were in different permitting stages.

Some companies havent done much outreach, Keene noted, like representatives for South Fork Wind. South Fork Wind is jointly owned by rsted and Eversource. The two companies also jointly owned Revolution Wind and Sunrise Wind, although Eversource relinquished its shares of these projects earlier this year.

Although not the only company owning projects in waters south of the Vineyard, rsted is the one company that rivals Avangrid in the number of projects planned in the maritime region.

Addressing some of the concerns raised, an rsted spokesperson stated, Weve taken a number of steps to ensure the coexistence of the commercial fishing industry with offshore wind often by being directly responsive to requests from the fishing community. Our outreach work has included fishers in Massachusetts, and specifically on Marthas Vineyard.

The spokesperson pointed to several ways rsted has engaged with the fishing community, like a direct compensation program to commercial fishermen impacted by the South Fork Wind project, committing over $3 million in coastal community funds in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and committing $2.3 million toward a navigational enhancement and training program to help commercial vessels acquire navigational equipment and access to professional mariner training.

When asked about the concerns surrounding undersea cables, Avangrid chief development officer Ken Kimmell pointed out that the offshore wind cables would not be the first of their kind. This happens literally all over the world, Kimmell said.

Kimmel emphasized that when offshore wind projects are planned out, developers are asked to designate a corridor to place the cables rather than laying them all over. He said these areas are studied intensely, and that Muskeget Channel was ideal as a cable-laying location because it was not used as intensely as a fishery.

Additionally, Kimmel said Avangrid would employ jet plowing, which he described as a cable-laying method that would have a minimized impact on the environment.

The record of decision from BOEM goes into detail about the cable-laying process, Kimmel said, and added that Avangrid had essentially received the green light from state entities for its projects.

Weve addressed all relevant environmental concerns, he said.

Back on the Vineyard, Brighton emphasized that fishermen are not climate change deniers. Some in the public have pointed at fishermen as climate deniers for their outspoken criticism of the offshore wind industry. Rather, Brighton and other fishermen wish that more consideration and collaboration had taken place before the offshore wind projects were approved.

He pointed to how Vineyard Winds compensation program requires commercial fishermen to have fished in the lease area for at least three years between 2016 and 2022, but fisheries experience booms and busts that can keep commercial fishing operations in other parts of the ocean.

As fishermen, were witnessing change, Brighton said.

See more here:

A submerged concern: offshore wind cables - Martha's Vineyard Times

Danish shipping and logistics group Maersk has partnered up with compatriot wind turbine maker Vestas to set up a nacelle factory and logistical base at the Mokpo New Port hinterland complex in South Korea.

A memorandum of understanding, signed in the presence of the Governor of Jeonnam Province Kim Yung-rok and the Mayor of Mokpo City Park Hong-ryul, outlines the duos aim to establish a competitive and sustainable industrial supply chain for offshore wind in South Korea and forge local partnerships, while Jeonnam Province and Mokpo City will provide administrative and financial support.

The Korean government is actively promoting offshore wind power projects, with plans to expand the capacity deployment to 26.7 GW by 2036. Vestas, which has already secured several orders in the country, said the investment plan with Maersk would be dependent on the pace of a growing market and awarded volume.

South Korea has a promising offshore wind market with the potential to become a hub for accelerating offshore wind energy. The agreement follows the strong technology offering we have with the V236-15 MW wind turbine and the recent commercial traction we have seen, said Tommy Rahbek Nielsen, chief of operations at Vestas.

Maersk chief executive Vincent Clerc said the deal with Vestas was a good step for project logistics in Asia Pacific and a key milestone in the companys integrator strategy of delivering end-to-end logistics solutions.

We continue to strengthen our partnership with Vestas, which is based on a shared vision and our joint commitment to a green, sustainable future for our planet, added Clerc.

The full details of the investment approach are currently under consideration, and the two companies said they would reveal further information when the plan is finalised.

Link:

Maersk sets sights on offshore wind logistics in South Korea - Splash247 - Splash 247

A lawsuit filed by eight shore towns against the Atlantic Shores offshore wind project was dismissed in court Thursday due to a lack of standing for homeowners and municipalities, Brigantine Mayor Vince Sera said.

Personally, I have a very hard time understanding how homeowners and municipalities have no standing in this case when these ocean wind projects will have major negative impacts to the ocean environment, our local economies, the value of peoples homes, and will dramatically increase the cost of electricity paid by everyone in New Jersey, Sera said in a news release.

The lawsuit was filed by Barnegat Light, Beach Haven, Brigantine, Harvey Cedars, Long Beach Township, Ship Bottom, Surf City and Ventnor on Dec. 1. It called for an independent review of the 1,510-megawatt wind turbine facility Atlantic Shores is working to build anywhere from 9 to 20 miles off the towns coasts.

The project review was to determine whether the 200-plus wind turbines being built standing almost as high as the Empire State Building at approximately 1,048 feet violated the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protections coastal regulations.

The DEP has a responsibility to adhere to their own Coastal Regulations, which prohibit development that threaten the scenic view and environment of the New Jersey Shore, Sera said.

All eight mayors in the lawsuit expressed concern about the DEPs ability to make a fair and impartial decision, citing pressure from Gov. Phil Murphy and his administration to make New Jersey a 100% clean energy state by 2035.

Residents on Tuesday asked Atlantic County commissioners to take a strong stand against offshore wind farms, and to reconsider how they spend the county's opioid settlement funds.

While I have tremendous respect for our legal system, I also understand the politics that are going on behind the scenes with the Murphy Administration doing everything in its power to force these ocean wind projects down peoples throats without any regard to the long-term and potentially irreversible damage that they will cause, Sera said.

Brigantine residents and members of the nonprofit Defend Brigantine Beach present at Tuesdays Atlantic County commissioners meeting pushed again for officials to take a strong stand against the wind turbines, noting they were neither green nor clean.

We are disappointed that a judge would think that the residents of the communities most impacted by the offshore wind project would have no standing in a matter that will impact our lives, our economy and our environment, Ventnor Mayor Lance Landgraf said Saturday.

Sera said the proximity and scale of the Atlantic Shores project would make it one of the largest, densest and closest offshore wind farms off any coast in the world.

The court filing highlighted other concerns, including the projects potential impact on the environment, marine life, property values and local economies, including fishing and tourism.

Im urging city council and every other municipality in the State to fight these ocean wind projects with everything they have before its too late, Sera said.

Read this article:

Brigantine, Ventnor respond to offshore wind suit dismissal - Press of Atlantic City

Denmark has launched its largest ever offshore wind tender, which it believes could lead to 100% renewable electricity in the country, as well as providing additional power for green hydrogen and its derivatives, such as ammonia and synthetic aviation fuel.

The government is offering 6GW of offshore wind capacity at six sites around the country, with the possibility for developers to overplant in their zones to establish up to 10GW or more.

With turbines in the hundreds, we are arming ourselves against Putins black gas, and today Denmark has come closer to becoming Europes green powerhouse, said climate and energy minister Lars Aagaard.

When the turbines spin, we can cover all of Denmarks power consumption with green power and we can produce hydrogen and green fuels for ships and aircraft.

However, the tender offers no subsidies to winning developers, which would have to give the Danish state a 20% ownership stake in their projects, as well as providing an annual concession payment to the government for 30 years.

In its announcement of the tender, the Danish Energy Agency said that the possible expansion to 10GW could potentially mean green electricity corresponding to the consumption of more than 10 million Danish and European households, although the green electricity could also be used for hydrogen or other Power-to-X products to replace fossil fuels.

Article continues below the advert

Gigawatt-scale offshore wind farms potentially offer economies of scale for green hydrogen developers, however, offshore wind remains one of the most expensive forms of renewable energy, even though costs have come down massively in recent years.

Projects could theoretically also be eligible for EU subsidies through the European Hydrogen Bank, but that would mean they would have to win two auctions.

Denmark foresees at least 6GW of offshore wind being installed at six locations by the end of 2030: three in the North Sea, 1.8-2.2GW in the Kattegat, and 1GW in the Baltic Sea (see map above).

Each 1GW of offshore wind is expected to require about DKr16bn ($2.3bn) of investment excluding hydrogen-related equipment such as electrolysers.

The country currently has an installed offshore wind capacity of 2.7GW, which is scheduled to rise to 3.7GW in 2027, when the Thor project currently under construction in the North Sea is due to be completed.

Read more from the original source:

Denmark launches 6GW offshore wind tender with an eye on production of green hydrogen and e-fuels - Hydrogen Insight