Category Archives: Mind Uploading

With the 118-day strike finally resolved and a new collective bargaining agreement obtained, there is a lot to digest and understand about how things will be moving forward. With that in mind, Casting Networks is producing a series of articles in which we will break down particular parts of the new agreement and discuss how it affects you.

One of the complaints that SAG-AFTRA members had voiced before the strike was the feeling of exploitation around self tape auditions. The COVID-19 pandemic closed casting rooms for years, resulting in a self tape boom, with increased expectations for actors. This was one of the more contentious parts of the negotiations, according to some reports.

Sides and casting calls must be distributed no less than 48 hours before the submission deadline, giving performers plenty of time to look over and prepare using the required materials. If a role is cast, a producer must alert performers of this if they ask about it.

Those who had issues with needing to learn too many pages for an audition had their concerns addressed, with an eight-page limit for a first self tape and 12 pages for any further callbacks.

Memorization has also been nixed.

Performers are no longer required to memorize materials for an audition, nor will they be penalized or prohibited from using sides or some kind of prompting device.

Performers with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations for materials in a format accessible to the performer.

One downside of the new agreement is that companies are not required to compensate performers for any self tape audition. That seems more than reasonable, however, when one considers the gains in this area.

For one thing, the quality of the self tape is no longer so high as to provide a prohibitive cost to the performer, who may not be asked to record at a resolution higher than 720p (quick tip: the action mode of a late model iPhone captures 1080p).

At the same time, producers are not allowed to use any uploading or delivery site for self tape that is not free. Nor can they demand actors use any editing software or specific equipment. No charges can be made to performers, in fact, for any general casting call or anything related to one.

Exploitation of performers in the form of nude scenes has been especially egregious, but that will no longer be an issue. No performer may be requested to appear nude or wearing anything more revealing than a bathing suit that could be the word at a public pool.

Stunts are also out. Performers can no longer be asked to perform them in an audition.

The amount of information required of a performer in an audition or self tape has also changed.

From now on, a producer is only allowed to ask the following in a slate: name, height, city of residence, current location, information about special skills and a head and shoulders and/or a full body shot in portrait orientation. For minors, a producer can ask about age and birthday.

Overall, the protections have improved across the board, and while the audition process might not be any easier than it was, the process will cost you less money and demand less of you.

Casting directors use Casting Networks every day to discover people like you. Sign up or log in today to get one step closer to your next role.

You may also like:

Instagram Icon Facebook Icon

Read the original post:

What You Need to Know About the New SAG-AFTRA Agreement ... - Casting Networks

Thursday 23 November at 1:14pm

We want you to send us your videos of great grassroots rugby action by posting them to @premrugby and @RFU on X (formerly Twitter) using the hashtag #grassrootsbeauts

Please post before 23.59 on 2 June 2024 and they could be shown in the Premiership Rugby highlights show, and be commentated on by our commentators and presenters. The chosen videos might also be used by ITV Premiership Rugby and the Rugby Football Union (RFU) on our social media channels and websites or in other ways.

By uploading your content, you agree to the following: You are aged 18 or over and have obtained the consent of all people featured in the Submission to ITVs use of the Submission in accordance with ITV General Participation Terms. Players shown must also be aged 18 or over. You have made the people featured in the Submission aware of the ITV Broadcasting Privacy Policy and Premiership Rugbys, the RFUs and 3 Rock Productions Privacy Policies (see links below). You are aware that this video could be shown on-air, online and on social channels, and you are aware of the effects of this and you have no concerns about it. Nothing in the video will bring ITV, Premiership Rugby or the RFU into disreputeWhen taking and submitting your content, please bear the following in mind:Do Shoot the videos in good light, ideally landscape Make it fun capture the spirit of rugby Ensure everyone featured in the video is 18 or over Make sure you have permission of the relevant club/sDon't Post videos that are blurry and out of focus Take videos of people without their express permission Have any branding in shot Take images of original artwork (unless you produced the artwork) Endanger yourself or others, or break any laws

Terms and Conditions & Privacy:

By responding to any invitation by us to submit a video, you'll be agreeing to our General Participation Terms.Any content that you submit or post in response to our call out, or that you post using #grassrootsbeauts may be treated by us as a "Submission" under our Terms. Any personal data provided (including personal details and content/videos) as part of your submission will be used and processed by ITV in accordance with the ITV Broadcasting Privacy Policy

If you have any questions about how we use your information, contact privacy@itv.com. It will also be used by Premiership Rugby Limited and the RFU in accordance with their Privacy Policies. Production Privacy Policy can be found here.

Read this article:

Premiership Rugby Highlights Show | Be on TV - ITVX

Of all Elon Musks exploits the Tesla cars, the SpaceX rockets, the Twitter takeover, the plans to colonize Mars his secretive brain chip company Neuralink may be the most dangerous.

What is Neuralink for? In the short term, its for helping people with paralysis. But thats not the whole answer.

Launched in 2016, the company revealed in 2019 that it had created flexible threads that can be implanted into a brain, along with a sewing-machine-like robot to do the implanting. The idea is that these threads will read signals from a paralyzed patients brain and transmit that data to an iPhone or computer, enabling the patient to control it with just their thoughts no need to tap or type or swipe.

So far, Neuralink has only done testing on animals. But in May, the company announced it had won FDA approval to run its first clinical trial in humans. Now, its recruiting paralyzed volunteers to study whether the implant enables them to control external devices. If the technology works in humans, it could improve quality of life for millions of people. Approximately 5.4 million people are living with paralysis in the US alone.

But helping paralyzed people is not Musks end goal. Thats just a step on the way to achieving a much wilder long-term ambition.

That ambition, in Musks own words, is to achieve a symbiosis with artificial intelligence. His goal is to develop a technology that helps humans merg[e] with AI so that we wont be left behind as AI becomes more sophisticated.

This fantastical vision is not the sort of thing for which the FDA greenlights human trials. But work on helping people with paralysis? That can get a warmer reception. And so it has.

But its important to understand that this technology comes with staggering risks. Former Neuralink employees as well as experts in the field alleged that the company pushed for an unnecessarily invasive, potentially dangerous approach to the implants that can damage the brain (and apparently has done so in animal test subjects) to advance Musks goal of merging with AI.

Neuralink did not respond to a request for comment.

There are also ethical risks for society at large that go beyond just Neuralink. A number of companies are developing tech that plugs into human brains, which can decode whats going on in our minds and has the potential to erode mental privacy and supercharge authoritarian surveillance. We have to prepare ourselves for whats coming.

Neuralink is a response to one big fear: that AI will take over the world.

This is a fear thats increasingly widespread among AI leaders, who worry that we may create machines that are smarter than humans and that have the ability to deceive us and ultimately seize control from us.

In March, many of them, including Musk, signed an open letter calling for a six-month pause on developing AI systems more powerful than OpenAIs GPT-4. The letter warned that AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity and went on to ask: Should we develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us? Should we risk loss of control of our civilization?

Although Musk is not alone in warning about civilizational risk posed by AI systems, where he differs from others is in his plan for warding off the risk. The plan is basically: If you cant beat em, join em.

Musk foresees a world where AI systems that can communicate information at a trillion bits per second will look down their metaphorical noses at humans, who can only communicate at 39 bits per second. To the AI systems, wed seem useless. Unless, perhaps, we became just like them.

A big part of that, in Musks view, is being able to think and communicate at the speed of AI. Its mostly about the bandwidth, the speed of the connection between your brain and the digital version of yourself, particularly output, he said in 2017. Some high bandwidth interface to the brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem.

Fast forward a half-dozen years, and you can see that Musk is still obsessed with this notion of bandwidth the rate at which computers can read out information from your brain. It is, in fact, the idea that drives Neuralink.

The Neuralink device is a brain implant, outfitted with 1,024 electrodes, that can pick up signals from a whole lot of neurons. The more electrodes youve got, the more neurons you can listen in on, and the more data youll get. Plus, the closer you can get to those neurons, the higher quality your data will be.

And the Neuralink device gets very close to the neurons. The companys procedure for implanting it requires drilling a hole in the skull and penetrating the brain.

But there are less extreme ways to go about this. Other companies are proving it. Lets break down what theyre doing and why Musk feels the need to do something different.

Neuralink isnt the only company exploring brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for restoring peoples physical capabilities. Other companies like Synchron, Blackrock Neurotech, Paradromics, and Precision Neuroscience are also working in this space. So is the US military.

In recent years, a lot of the research thats made headlines has focused on brain implants that would translate paralyzed peoples thoughts into speech. Mark Zuckerbergs Meta, for example, is working on BCIs that could pick up thoughts directly from your neurons and translate them into words in real time. (In the long term, the company says it aims to give everyone the ability to control keyboards, augmented reality glasses, and more, using just their thoughts.)

Earlier success in the BCI field focused not on speech, but on movement. In 2006, Matthew Nagle, a man with spinal cord paralysis, received a brain implant that allowed him to control a computer cursor. Soon Nagle was playing Pong using only his mind.

Nagles brain implant, developed by the research consortium BrainGate, contained a Utah array, a cluster of 100 spiky electrodes that is surgically embedded into the brain. Thats only around one-tenth of the electrodes in Neuralinks device. But it still enabled a paralyzed person to move a cursor, check email, adjust the volume or channel on a TV, and control a robotic limb. Since then, others with paralysis have achieved similar feats with BCI technology.

While early technologies like the Utah array protruded awkwardly from the skull, newer BCIs are invisible to the outside observer once theyre implanted, and some are much less invasive.

Synchrons BCI, for example, builds on stent technology thats been around since the 1980s. A stent is a metal scaffold that you can introduce into a blood vessel; it can be safely left there for decades (and has been in many cardiac patients, keeping their arteries open). Synchron uses a catheter to send a stent up into a blood vessel in the motor cortex of the brain. Once there, the stent unfurls like a flower, and sensors on it pick up signals from neurons. This has already enabled several paralyzed people to tweet and text with their thoughts.

No open brain surgery necessary. No drilling holes in the skull.

Musk himself has said that BCIs wouldnt necessarily require open brain surgery, in a telling five-minute video at Recodes Code Conference in 2016. You could go through the veins and arteries, because that provides a complete roadway to all of your neurons, he said. You could insert something basically into the jugular and...

After the audience laughed nervously, he added, It doesnt involve chopping your skull off or anything like that.

In Neuralinks early years, before the company had settled on its current approach which does involve drilling into the skull one of its research teams allegedly looked into the tamer intravascular approach, four former Neuralink employees told me. This team explored the option of delivering a device to the brain through an artery and demonstrated that it was feasible.

But by 2019, Neuralink had rejected this option, choosing instead to go with the more invasive surgical robot that implants threads directly into the brain.

Why? If the intravascular approach can restore key functioning to paralyzed patients, and also avoids some of the safety risks that come with crossing the blood-brain barrier, such as inflammation and scar tissue buildup in the brain, why opt for something more invasive than necessary?

The company isnt saying. But according to Hirobumi Watanabe, who led Neuralinks intravascular research team in 2018, the main reason was the companys obsession with maximizing bandwidth.

The goal of Neuralink is to go for more electrodes, more bandwidth, Watanabe said, so that this interface can do way more than what other technologies can do.

After all, Musk has suggested that a seamless merge with machines could enable us to do everything from enhancing our memory to uploading our minds and living forever staples of Silicon Valleys transhumanist fantasies. Which perhaps helps make sense of the companys dual mission: to create a generalized brain interface to restore autonomy to those with unmet medical needs today and unlock human potential tomorrow.

Neuralink is explicitly aiming at producing general-purpose neural interfaces, the Munich-based neuroethicist Marcello Ienca told me. To my knowledge, they are the only company that is currently planning clinical trials for implantable medical neural interfaces while making public statements about future nonmedical applications of neural implants for cognitive enhancement. To create a general-purpose technology, you need to create a seamless interface between humans and computers, enabling enhanced cognitive and sensory abilities. Achieving this vision may indeed require more invasive methods to achieve higher bandwidth and precision.

Watanabe believes Neuralink prioritized maximizing bandwidth because that serves Musks goal of creating a generalized BCI that lets us merge with AI and develop all sorts of new capacities. Thats what Elon Musk is saying, so thats what the company has to do, he said.

The intravascular approach didnt seem like it could deliver as much bandwidth as the invasive approach. Staying in the blood vessels may be safer, but the downside is that you dont have access to as many neurons. Thats the biggest reason they did not go for this approach, Watanabe said. Its rather sad. He added that he believed Neuralink was too quick to abandon the minimally invasive approach. We could have pushed this project forward.

For Tom Oxley, the CEO of Synchron, this raises a big question. The question is, does a clash emerge between the short-term goal of patient-oriented clinical health outcomes and the long-term goal of AI symbiosis? he told me. I think the answer is probably yes.

It matters what youre designing for and if you have a patient problem in mind, Oxley added. Synchron could theoretically build toward increasing bandwidth by miniaturizing its tech and going into deeper branches of the blood vessels; research shows this is viable. But, he said, we chose a point at which we think we have enough signal to solve a problem for a patient.

Ben Rapoport, a neurosurgeon who left Neuralink to found Precision Neuroscience, emphasized that any time youve got electrodes penetrating the brain, youre doing some damage to brain tissue. And thats unnecessary if your goal is helping paralyzed patients.

I dont think that tradeoff is required for the kind of neuroprosthetic function that we need to restore speech and motor function to patients with stroke and spinal cord injury, Rapoport told me. One of our guiding philosophies is that building a high-fidelity brain-computer interface system can be accomplished without damaging the brain.

To prove that you dont need Muskian invasiveness to achieve high bandwidth, Precision has designed a thin film that coats the surface of the brain with 1,024 electrodes the same number of electrodes in Neuralinks implant that deliver signals similar to Neuralinks. The film has to be inserted through a slit in the skull, but the advantage is that it sits on the brains surface without penetrating it. Rapoport calls this the Goldilocks solution, and its already been implanted in a handful of patients, recording their brain activity at high resolution.

Its key to do a very, very safe procedure that doesnt damage the brain and that is minimally invasive in nature, Rapoport said. And furthermore, that as we scale up the bandwidth of the system, the risk to the patient should not increase.

This makes sense if your most cherished ambition is to help patients improve their lives as much as possible without courting undue risk. But Musk, we know, has other ambitions.

What Neuralink doesnt seem to be very interested in is that while a more invasive approach might offer advantages in terms of bandwidth, it raises greater ethical and safety concerns, Ienca told me. At least, I havent heard any public statement in which they indicate how they intend to address the greater privacy, safety, and mental integrity risks generated by their approach. This is strange because according to international research ethics guidelines it wouldnt be ethical to use a more invasive technology if the same performance can be achieved using less invasive methods.

More invasive methods, by their nature, can do real damage to the brain as Neuralinks experiments on animals have shown.

Some Neuralink employees have come forward to speak on behalf of the pigs and monkeys used in the companys experiments, saying they suffered and died at higher rates than necessary because the company was rushing and botching surgeries. Musk, they alleged, was pushing the staff to get FDA approval quickly after hed repeatedly predicted the company would soon start human trials.

One example of a grisly error: In 2021, Neuralink implanted 25 out of 60 pigs with devices that were the wrong size. Afterward, the company killed all the affected pigs. Staff told Reuters that the mistake could have been averted if theyd had more time to prepare.

Veterinary reports indicate that Neuralinks monkeys also suffered gruesome fates. In one monkey, a bit of the device broke off during implantation in the brain. The monkey scratched and yanked until part of the device was dislodged, and infections took hold. Another monkey developed bleeding in her brain, with the implant leaving parts of her cortex tattered. Both animals were euthanized.

Last December, the US Department of Agricultures Office of Inspector General launched an investigation into possible animal welfare violations at Neuralink. The company is also facing a probe from the Department of Transportation over worries that implants removed from monkeys brains may have been packaged and moved unsafely, potentially exposing people to pathogens.

Past animal experiments [at Neuralink] revealed serious safety concerns stemming from the products invasiveness and rushed, sloppy actions by company employees, said the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a nonprofit that opposes animal testing, in a May statement. As such, the public should continue to be skeptical of the safety and functionality of any device produced by Neuralink.

Nevertheless, the FDA has cleared the company to begin human trials.

The company has provided sufficient information to support the approval of its IDE [investigational device exemption] application to begin human trials under the criteria and requirements of the IDE approval, the FDA said in a statement to Vox, adding, The agencys focus for determining approval of an IDE is based on assessing the safety profile for potential subjects, ensuring risks are appropriately minimized and communicated to subjects, and ensuring the potential for benefit, including the value of the knowledge to be gained, outweighs the risk.

Beyond what the surgeries will mean for the individuals who get recruited for Neuralinks trials, there are ethical concerns about what BCI technology means for society more broadly. If high-bandwidth implants of the type Musk is pursuing really do allow unprecedented access to whats happening in peoples brains, that could make dystopian possibilities more likely. Some neuroethicists argue that the potential for misuse is so great that we need revamped human rights laws to protect us before we move forward.

For one thing, our brains are the final privacy frontier. Theyre the seat of our personal identity and our most intimate thoughts. If those precious three pounds of goo in our craniums arent ours to control, what is?

In China, the government is already mining data from some workers brains by having them wear caps that scan their brainwaves for emotional states. In the US, the military is looking into neurotechnologies to make soldiers more fit for duty more alert, for instance.

And some police departments around the world have been exploring brain fingerprinting technology, which analyzes automatic responses that occur in our brains when we encounter stimuli we recognize. (The idea is that this could enable police to interrogate a suspects brain; their brain responses would be more negative for faces or phrases they dont recognize than for faces or phrases they do recognize.) Brain fingerprinting tech is scientifically questionable, yet Indias police have used it since 2003, Singapores police bought it in 2013, and the Florida state police signed a contract to use it in 2014.

Imagine a scenario where your government uses BCIs for surveillance or interrogations. The right to not self-incriminate enshrined in the US Constitution could become meaningless in a world where the authorities are empowered to eavesdrop on your mental state without your consent.

Experts also worry that devices like those being built by Neuralink may be vulnerable to hacking. What happens if youre using one of them and a malicious actor intercepts the Bluetooth connection, changing the signals that go to your brain to make you more depressed, say, or more compliant?

Neuroethicists refer to that as brainjacking. This is still hypothetical, but the possibility has been demonstrated in proof-of-concept studies, Ienca told me in 2019. A hack like this wouldnt require that much technological sophistication.

Finally, consider how your psychological continuity or fundamental sense of self could be disrupted by the imposition of a BCI or by its removal. In one study, an epileptic woman whod been given a BCI came to feel such a radical symbiosis with it that, she said, It became me. Then the company that implanted the device in her brain went bankrupt and she was forced to have it removed. She cried, saying, I lost myself.

To ward off the risk of a hypothetical all-powerful AI in the future, Musk wants to create a symbiosis between your brain and machines. But the symbiosis generates its own very real risks and they are upon us now.

Will you support Voxs explanatory journalism?

Most news outlets make their money through advertising or subscriptions. But when it comes to what were trying to do at Vox, there are a couple reasons that we can't rely only on ads and subscriptions to keep the lights on.

First, advertising dollars go up and down with the economy. We often only know a few months out what our advertising revenue will be, which makes it hard to plan ahead.

Second, were not in the subscriptions business. Vox is here to help everyone understand the complex issues shaping the world not just the people who can afford to pay for a subscription. We believe thats an important part of building a more equal society. We cant do that if we have a paywall.

Thats why we also turn to you, our readers, to help us keep Vox free. If you also believe that everyone deserves access to trusted high-quality information, will you make a gift to Vox today?

Yes, I'll give $5/month

Yes, I'll give $5/month

We accept credit card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. You can also contribute via

View original post here:

Elon Musks Neuralink wants to merge your brain with AI at what ... - Vox.com

Aviv Kutz (54), a member of Kibbutz Kfar Aza, is a childhood friend of a very close friend of mine. Aviv and his wife Livnat (49), and their three children Rotem (19), Yonatan (17) and Yiftach (15), have lived in Kfar Aza for years. Although the Kutz family has endured many Hamas rocket and mortar attacks on their kibbutz, parents and children continued to hope for peace. Every year the Kutz family organized a kite-flying festival, meant to create a small peaceful space in the war zone. Colorful kitessome displaying peace messageswere flown near the border fence with Gaza. Livnats sister, Adi Levy Salma, who participated in the festival in previous years said that the idea is to fly the kites near the fence, to show Gaza that we only want to live in peace. This years kite festival was planned for Saturday, 7 October. Kite festival 2023, said the invitation, we will meet at the football pitch at 16:00 to decorate the sky. A few hours before the festival began, Hamas terrorists invaded and occupied the kibbutz. The terrorists went from house to house, systematically torturing, murdering, and kidnapping dozens of kibbutz members. All five members of the Kutz family were slaughtered.

The mind boggles at such atrocities. Why do human beings do such things? What did Hamas hope to achieve? The aim of the Hamas attack was not to capture and hold territory. Hamas didnt have the military capability to hold the kibbutz for long in face of the Israeli army. To understand the aims of Hamas, three things should be noted. First, Hamas largely focused its attack on killing and kidnapping civilians rather than soldiers. Second, Hamas terrorists tortured and executed adults, children, and even babies in the most gruesome ways the terrorists could think of. Third, instead of trying to hide the atrocities, Hamas made sure they were publicized, even filming some of the atrocities itself and uploading the shocking videos to social media.

This is the very definition of terrorism, and we have seen similar things before with ISIS. Unlike conventional warfare that usually aims to capture territory or degrade military capabilities, terrorism is a form of psychological warfare that aims to terrify. By killing hundreds of people in horrendous ways and publicizing it, organizations like ISIS and Hamas seek to terrify millions. In addition to spreading terror, Hamas also aims to sow seeds of hatred in the minds of millions Israelis, Palestinians, and other people throughout the world.

Hamas is different from other Palestinian organization like the PLO, and should not be equated with the whole Palestinian people. Since its foundation, Hamas adamantly refused to recognize Israels right to exist, and has done everything in its power to ruin every chance for peace between Israelis and Palestinians, and between Israel and the Arab world. The immediate background to the current cycle of violence is the peace treaties signed between Israel and several Gulf States, and the hoped-for peace treaty between Israel and Saudi Arabia. This treaty was expected not only to normalize relations between Israel and most of the Arab world, but also to somewhat alleviate the suffering of millions of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation, and to restart the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Nothing alarms Hamas more than the possibility of peace. This is why it launched its attackand this is why it murdered the Kutz family and more than a thousand other Israeli civilians. What Hamas has done is a crime against humanity in the deepest sense of the term. A crime against humanity isnt just about killing humans. It is about destroying our trust in humanity. When you witness things like parents being tortured and executed in front of their children, or toddlers brutally murdered, you lose all trust in human beings. And you thereby risk losing your own humanity, too.

Hamass crimes cannot be justified by blaming them on past Israeli conduct. Two wrongs dont make a right. There is much to criticize Israel for holding millions of Palestinians for decades under occupation, and for abandoning in recent years any serious attempt to make peace with the Palestinian people. However, the murder of the Kutz family and the many other atrocities committed by Hamas were not meant to restart the peace process, nor are they likely to liberate a single Palestinian from Israeli occupation. Instead, the war Hamas launched inflicts immense suffering on millions of Palestinians. Driven by its religious fanaticism, Hamas just doesnt seem to care about human sufferingeither of Israelis or Palestinians. Unlike the secular PLO, many of Hamass leaders and activists seem to care mainly about their fantasies of heavenly afterlife. They are willing to consign this world to the flames and to destroy our souls in the process, so that their own souls will allegedly enjoy everlasting bliss in another world.

We must win this war of souls. In its war against Hamas, Israel has a duty to defend its territory and its citizens, but it must also defend its humanity. Our war is with Hamas, not with the Palestinian people. Palestinian civilians deserve to enjoy peace and prosperity in their homeland, and even in the midst of conflict their basic human rights should be recognized by all sides. This refers not only to Israel, but also to Egypt, which shares a border with the Gaza Strip, and which has partially sealed that border.

As for Hamas, it and its supporters should be excommunicated by humanity. Not only Israel, but the entire human community should place Hamas completely beyond its pale, just as it has previously done with ISIS. Israeli citizens cannot live in places like Kfar Aza with Hamas across the fence, just as Iraqi and Syrian citizens could not live with ISIS on their doorstep. Tens of thousands of Israeli civilians have already fled the border areas, and they cannot go back to their homes until the threat to their lives is removed. At a deeper level, the lives of all humans are devalued and endangered as long as organizations like Hamas and ISIS are allowed to exist.

The aims of the Gaza War should be clear. At the end of the war, Hamas should be totally disarmed and the Gaza Strip should be demilitarized, so that Palestinian civilians could live dignified lives within the Gaza Strip, and Israeli civilians could live without fear alongside the Gaza Strip. Until these aims are achieved, the struggle to maintain our humanity will be difficult. Most Israelis are psychologically incapable at this moment of empathizing with the Palestinians. The mind is filled to the brim with our own pain, and no space is left to even acknowledge the pain of others. Many of the people who tried to hold such a spacelike the Kutz familyare dead or deeply traumatized. Most Palestinians are in an analogous situationtheir minds too are so filled with pain, they cannot see our pain.

But outsiders who are not themselves immersed in pain should make an effort to empathize with all suffering humans, rather than lazily seeing only part of the terrible reality. It is the job of outsiders to help maintain a space for peace. We deposit this peaceful space with you, because we cannot hold it right now. Take good care of it for us, so that one day, when the pain begins to heal, both Israelis and Palestinians might inhabit that space.

See the original post:

The World's Job During the War on Hamas: Save the Space For Peace - TIME

Brooklyn Beckham has hit back at haters who have taken issue with his many cooking videos.

The eldest child of David and Victoria Beckham began uploading cooking tutorials to his social media pages in late 2021.

He has since cooked items such as grilled cheese, steak and potatoes, and pasta dish FettuccineAlfredo, posting tutorials to his 16.2 million followers.

The budding chef has also teamed up with brands such as Chosen Foods and Typhur on his page.

Many of his videos have come under fire - with people mocking the 24-year-old for everything from the way he cooks, to the ingredients he uses and even his presenting skills.

However, in a new interview with Insider, Beckham said he was used to hate online - adding that cooking made him happy and he wasnt planning on stopping any time soon.

To be honest, Im used to the hate, Beckham said. It doesnt really bother me. Cooking makes me happy. I have more important things to worry about than people saying a little bit of rubbish about me.

Previously, his grilled cheese tutorial was one of the more controversial posts.

In the commenters, one critic wrote: Blowtorching pieces of toast. So unnecessary, A second added: God this is utterly cringe and boring. Please tell me this is satire, wrote another.

Commenting on the fact the star appeared to have a hole in his trousers, a fourth added: The hole is distracting me," while a fifth commented: Can you not afford a pair of trousers without holes? This is embarrassing and ridiculous.

He was also called out by fans for one very basic salad and plain spaghetti tutorial, and attracted criticism for reportedly hiring a film crew for $100,000 to film him making a sandwich, as well as requiring assistance with frying a hash brown.

Earlier this year, the star discussed where his love of food had come from and shared some of the places he and wife Nicola Peltzs like to eat in LA.

The wannabe chef started the video by sharing his memories of dining with his famous parents.

Story continues

He said: I grew up in London. I always used to go to the pub, and we used to go after my dad played football.

I didnt drink, because I was too young, but I used to have the pie and mash and fish and chips in the newspaper with vinegar.

However, his palate has broadened over the years: My and my wife, we are obsessed, our favourite food is Japanese they way the Japanese treat food, they are so careful and so precise, he said.

I love cooking because its one of the few things that takes my mind off anything thats happening, he continued.

One of the many things I like about chefs is they are so artistic, they are so hardworking, and its always every day, every minute of every hour trying to master their craft.

It comes following the success of the Netflix documentary Beckham - about his fathers early life and rise to fame as one of the countrys best-loved footballers.

Visit link:

Brooklyn Beckham hits back at haters who mock his online cooking videos - Yahoo News UK

DEATH is one of the few certainties in life but there are plenty working out ways to beat it.

There are some scientists who think immortality will be achievable for humans.

1

It might involve swapping out human bodies for machine versions or it could involve a wonder drug.

The timeline of how we'll get there is also heavily debated.

One futurist has predicted that humans will become immortal by 2030.

Ray Kurzweilis a computer scientist and former Google engineer who has correctly predicted future technologies in the past.

In his book The Singularity Is Near, the famous futurist suggests we'll have the technology to help humans live forever by 2030.

He thinks this technology could come in the form of nanobots that can repair the body internally.

Futurologist Dr Ian Pearson previously told The Sun about his own immortality predictons.

He thinks the hard part will be surviving until the technology becomes widely available.

Back in 2020, Pearson predicted the richest in society could access this tech by 2050.

He said: "By 2050, it will only really be for the rich and famous.

"Most people on middle-class incomes and reasonable working-class incomes can probably afford this in the 2060s.So anyone 90 or under by 2060.

"If you were born sometime in 1970 onwards, that would make you 48 this year.

"So anybody under 50 has got a good chance of it, and anyone under 40 almost definitely will have access to this."

The tech that could keep us alive could involve android bodies which have humans mind uploading to them, according to the expert.

He also thinks bio-technologies could be used to renew and rejuvinate human bodies in a way that is currently impossible.

See the original post here:

Secret to immortality could be just a decade away as scientists predict when well learn to live forever... - The US Sun

Roblox users can now give their avatars a fresh look with the addition of Roblox heads and bodies to the UGC creator program. This program allows users to create and sell in-game cosmetics such as t-shirts, bags, and accessories. The best part? Unlike other items in the UGC program, the new heads and bodies do not require a minimum fee or upload fee.

With this update, users can download as many heads and bodies as they like and even upload their own creations up to ten times a day. So, if youre tired of your usual Roblox avatar, now is the perfect time to switch things up.

However, there are some rules and regulations to keep in mind when uploading heads and bodies to the UGC database. While you can upload individual heads without any issues, bodies cannot be put up for sale without a head attached. This rule ensures that avatars in the Roblox world are not walking around decapitated.

According to a statement from Roblox, this update is just the beginning of their efforts to expand avatar creation and enable more immersive communication and self-expression on the platform. They aim to allow users to create a wide range of skin tones, body sizes, hair colors, textures, and styles to enhance self-expression.

In conclusion, Roblox heads and bodies are now available in the UGC program, giving users the opportunity to customize their avatars and express themselves in unique ways. To explore more features and codes on the platform, be sure to check out Roblox promo codes and game codes, including Project Slayers codes, IQ Wars Simulator codes, and Nuke Simulator codes.

Read more from the original source:

Roblox Introduces Heads and Bodies to the UGC Program - Game Is Hard

Logan Paul has his hands full with Dillon Danis who is Conor McGregors friend. Usually, its the Paul brothers who are known for their mind games and trash-talking. However, not many could have predicted just how hard and aggressive El Jefe is in his mind games with Paul. Danis has not only thrashed the 28-year old himself but has even gone after his fiance Nina Agdal. A UFC veteran chimed in, warning Paul about his fiance and even comparing her with Cardi B.

Logan Paul will take on Dillon Danis on October 14 under the Misfit boxing card. Whats more, Paul is also having some issues with his younger brother Jake whilst he is catching heat from Danis. Thus, it is getting too much to handle for Paul as he is taking a legal route to stop Danis.

While all of this is unfolding, a UFC veteran came out and Tweeted about how Danis is going after Pauls fiance. After examining the situation the veteran shared a warning to Paul and even compared Nina Agdal to Cardi B.

Jake Shields is quite active on Twitter. Recently Shields made his opinion public on the heated feud between Logan Paul and Danis. Shields advises Paul to find another fiance since Conor McGregors friend Danis is going after Agdal and unearthing her past embarrassing memories.

Shields wrote, After looking at @dillondanis Twitter I think Logan Paul needs to find a new fiance I have know idea who she is but Danis has made her look like a bigger thot than Cardi B The fact that his only response is to send Danis a Cease and desist tells you all you need to know

Loading embed tweet https://twitter.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1691968588587147424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

After looking at the Tweets of Danis, many wondered where he is getting the Tweets from. Adin Ross made a video and claimed that somebody from Logan Pauls team are snitching and sharing the content with Danis. Surprisingly, Danis revealed who was sharing the content.

El Jefe through his recent Tweet claimed that Jake Paul and Mike are helping him with the content of Nina which he is uploading on Twitter. This comes after, Adin Ross created a video claiming that there is someone within Logans inner circle who is supporting Danis.

Danis wrote, My informants are Mike Majlak & Jake Paul.

My informants are Mike Majlak & Jake Paul. https://t.co/sAQNP4sa2i

Loading embed tweet https://twitter.com/dillondanis/status/1692341585088803245?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Until now, Logan Paul has not made any comments whatsoever regarding Danis Twitter outburst. However, it would make things interesting if there was someone who was helping Danis within Logans close circle.

Follow this link:

Bigger Th*t Than Cardi B: Amidst Conor McGregor's Friend's Feud ... - The Sportsrush

From her elegant Chanel wardrobe to the timeless floral arrangements that flanked the aisle, Sofia Richies wedding to Elliot Grainge on April 22, 2023, in Antibes, France, quickly became one of the most-talked about celebrations of the year. The public immediately became infatuated with the stylish dcor and fashion that filled the affair. Plus, the star-studded guest list, which included Cameron Diaz, Benji Madden, Paris Hilton, Carter Reum, and more, grabbed everyones attention. During an interview for Town & Countrys September 2023 issue, the model opened up about her approach to wedding planning and what inspired her special day. I wanted it to feel timeless, she shares. I pored over photos of classic royal weddings and pulled in little things that I wanted.

For her big day, Richie sported three fashionable looks from Chanel. During the interview, the newly-minted Mrs. Grainge explained how the collaboration with the fashion powerhouse came to fruition. Chanel had been my favorite designer forever, Richie notes. So, someone said, Why dont you do Chanel? And I was like, Oh, I wish it was that easy. And then, we said, Well, why dont we ask? So, we reached out, and they were kind enough and open enough to do one dress, the wedding dress, and then, that kind of segued into, OK, how am I going to ever find another designer for my rehearsal dinner that could balance out Chanel? So, I went back to them, and I was like, Feel free to say no, but would you mind doing another? They were so sweet. They did a couple more pieces.

Richie ended up wearing a a long-sleeved beaded dress with a high neck and fringe detailing for the rehearsal dinner, which took place at a private estate on April 21, 2023. This is like a fairy tale, she said about the dress. It really is. Its like an art piece. I feel like a princess. I really do! For the main outfit of the day, the bride walked down the aisle in a beaded ensemble with a high neckline that exhibited scalloped detailing. It is such magic, she expressed before her big day. I honestly think Elliot is going to love it. Richie incorporated sentimental details into the gown, including a monogrammed S&E on the inside of the gown and two hidden hearts to symbolize their union.

For her third and final look of the night, Richie changed into a mini dress with a 3D floral accent in the middle of the gown for the after-party. This, to me, is like my little girl dream, Richie gushed. And the fact that it is inspired [by] Claudia Schiffers runway dress is iconic and dope. I can dance. I can move. I love it! Its traditional Chanel.

Rachpoot/Bauer-Griffin/Getty Images

Richie admitted to Vogue before she tied the knot that working closely with Chanel to customize every piece and try on each look at the designer's haute couture salons was intimidating at first, but it was ultimately a dream experience. But they were so open to hearing my thoughts and suggestions, and they were so lovely to work with, and I adore everyone that I got to know along the process, she said. Its something Ill never forget.

The models wedding also became the object of the publics fascination because Richie shared many behind-the-scenes details with her followers on social media, such as doing her makeup for her rehearsal dinner and uploading footage of her wedding video. She tells Town & Country that she had zero motive to use her big day as a way to grow her following on social media. For me, my wedding wasnt an event, she says. It was just my wedding. Despite the content she shares on TikTok and Instagram, Richie explains that she keeps certain aspects of her life and her marriage private. We dont live out our whole lives on Instagram, she notes. We know when to turn it off.

Visit link:

Sofia Richie Says Royal Weddings Inspired Her Nuptials - Brides

The hype around BeReal has been going on for more than a year. Its an app that encourages people to be their natural selves and spend less time on social media. Most people know it by its unique feature that prompts people to capture a front and back camera photo of them once a day at a random time and share it with others. However, since BeReals launch, there have been some changes.

This article talks about the BeReal app, how many times a day you can post your BeReal photos, and how the apps rules have changed over time.

As mentioned, BeReal started as an app that sends notifications once a day and asks for a photo of their back and front camera view. The pictures are snapped at the same time, and you can preview the upload before you press Post.

You need to upload your very first BeReal post right after setting up your account. Heres how you do it:

Thats how BeReal has been functioning for a long time. If you dont snap and post a photo during the two minutes after the notification goes off, you can still post your BeReal at any point of the day. But keep in mind that BeReal publicly displays how much youre late.

You wont be able to see other peoples posts until you make a post, creating an incentive for people to post daily so they can interact.

If you successfully create a post each day, BeReal rewards you with its new feature called Bonus BeReal. The Bonus BeReal feature that has been up since April 2023 allows you to post one or two additional photos on the same day.

After uploading your first post, the Bonus BeReal feature appears next to your first post. You just need to press the + button and upload the photos as you usually would. If you post your first BeReal late, Bonus BeReal has a lock, and you cant access it until you get back on track with timing.

Note that the Bonus BeReal feature is still a fairly new feature, available only to select regions. A good indication of whether its available in your country is the promotion banner that appears in the app the moment you install it. If you still cant see the feature even after posting your BeReal on time, try using a VPN to change your location.

Although BeReal is all about being natural and spontaneously taking a photo of your daily life, the app does allow you to delete your post and upload a new image. Still, you only have one shot. On the other hand, for late posts, you can delete and upload as many times as you want. The new time will be displayed next to your post.

Heres how to delete a BeReal post and upload a new one:

If you accidentally or purposefully delete the retake, you wont be able to add another BeReal until the subsequent notification goes off.

BeReal is probably the first popular app that has experimented with the one-photo-per-day rule. Nevertheless, social media apps are constantly competing with each other and looking for ways to include all the possible features offered by other apps, and this case is no exception. While Instagram is testing out its Candid Story feature, TikTok has already introduced its TikTok Now option thats quite similar to BeReal.

Currently, BeReal only allows posting photos. However, if you want to spice your photos up a bit, you can add music to your posts. For now, you can only connect to Spotify and pick a song from there, but the app has announced implementing other streaming platforms.

Deleting your first daily BeReal automatically deletes your Bonus BeReals. That being said, your Bonus BeReals shouldnt be your do-over. For that, you have the option to retake the initial BeReal, but only once.

Just like your regular BeReals, Bonus BeReals are also available in your Memories after their designated day passes. You can view them by going to your profile and tapping View all my Memories or choosing a specific day on which you added Bonus BeReals.

BeReal started as an app that promotes self-confidence in an exciting and innovative way. But even though its a relatively new app, like many other social media platforms, BeReal has also gone through changes. On top of one post per day, you can now add two more photos if you want. Whether this ruins the entire concept of spending less time on social media or not is still in question.

Have you already tried taking your first BeReal? What are your thoughts on the Bonus BeReal feature? Tell us in the comments below.

View original post here:

How Many Times a Day to Post to BeReal a Day - Alphr