Category Archives: Libertarian

Leslie Baum Rossi, a Republican, appeared headed toward a victory in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives 59th Legislative District special election as of midnight on Wednesday.

But complete unofficial results were not released.

In Somerset County, where all election day votes but none of the mail-in were announced, Rossi had 2,320 votes, compared to 812 for Democrat Mariah Fisher and 58 for Libertarian Robb Luther. Meanwhile, in Westmoreland County, with 38 of 41 precincts reporting, Rossi had 7,624 votes, compared to 4,074 for Fisher and 325 for Luther.

They were running in a special election to fill the seat left vacant by the death of Rep. Mike Reese, a Republican, earlier this year.

In a previous interview with The Tribune-Democrat, Rossi described her political views by saying, My values are very far right. Im pro-Second Amendment. Im pro-life. I really have no liberal anything. Im far right. Im a far-right conservative for the working class.

Rossi is an ardent supporter of former President Donald Trump.

Luther, a marketing professional with a Pittsburgh firm, left the Republican Party, becoming a Libertarian, because he did not support the claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump, which turned into a central belief for the GOP over the past six months.

As a Libertarian, we run of principle, Luther said during an interview around 11 p.m. We know were a third party, so we know its a stretch. But we go out there and give it everything we have.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Dave Sutor is a reporter for The Tribune-Democrat. He can be reached at814-532-5056. Follow him on Twitter@Dave_Sutor.

Read the original:

Rossi holds big lead in 59th Legislative District special election - TribDem.com

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

A new ad supporting former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang in the New York City mayoral race comes with an interesting disclosure at the end: The top three spenders responsible for the ad are all Republican megadonors.

GOP support for Yang, who is running in the citys Democratic primary, is showing up in donations to super PACs, which can accept unlimited amounts of cash. Jeff Yass, a libertarian billionaire and longtime supporter of Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), is the first name listed on the pro-Yang ad from a super PAC called Comeback PAC. Andrew has a lot of libertarian leanings, Yasswho has bankrolled numerous Republicanstold Politico recently. He is not quite a libertarian, to say the least, but he has those leanings.

As I wrote earlier this week, Yang is viewed suspiciously by many New York progressives, who see him as a corporate-style Democrat with libertarian tendencies. Yangs centrist leanings are most apparent in his views on business and economics, and his campaign is being guided by a consulting and lobbying firm that has run campaigns to stop tax hikes on the wealthy.

Two other major GOP donors round out the list on the super PACs ad disclosure. Kenneth Griffin has spent millions in recent years to elect national Republicans. Daniel Loeb has supported Republicans, as well as New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a moderate Democrat.

Griffin and Loeb, both hedge fund managers, have hedged their bets in the mayorsraceby also donating a combined $2 million to a super PAC supporting Eric Adams, another moderate candidate who recently overtook Yang in some polls.

These three arent the only big-money donors jumping into the Democratic primary. Republican donor and oil magnate John Hess has donated $1 million to support Ray McGuire, a Wall Street executive who is seen as another centrist in the field. George Soros dropped $500,000 to support progressive Maya Wiley. And unions have likewise opened their pocketbooks to support progressives who are currently trailing Yang and Adams. Shaun Donovan, former HUD secretary under President Barack Obama, has benefited from nearly $7 million in outside spending from his father, Michael Donovan.

Read the original here:

A Top Rand Paul Donor Is Dropping Big Bucks to Elect Andrew Yang Mother Jones - Mother Jones

Kyle Wingfield| Opinion contributor

This is a column by Kyle Wingfield, president and CEO of theGeorgia Public Policy Foundation, a Libertarian-leaning policy think tank based in Atlanta.

No government, Ronald Reagan once observed, ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!

That was true when Reagan said it almost 60 years ago. Nothing in the intervening years has proven him wrong.

Trouble is, nowadays were launching government programs by the trillions of dollars. And theres depressingly little reason to believe well see them disappear once the crisis used to justify them has ended.

Consider the stimulus package Congress passed in 2009, in the name of fighting the previous recession. That package, which eventually weighed in at more than $800 billion, was alleged to be one-time funding that would indeed disappear.

No such luck. Federal spending in 2009 surpassed $3 trillion for the first time, checking in at just over $3.5 trillion. It never again fell below $3.4 trillion. The one-time stimulus spending simply came to be baked into the cake.

Every number I just cited is fairly quaint by todays standards. Congress spent $3.5 trillion last year on COVID-19 relief bills alone, tacking on another $1.9 trillion earlier this year.

If you dont think these mind-boggling sums are on track to become permanent features of the federal landscape, recall that President Joe Biden has proposed more than $4 trillion in additional new spending. At least that amount would be spent over the course of several years. On the other hand, its only May; more proposals are probably on the way.

Just as the sweets you eat today will hang around your waistline well after tomorrow if you dont do something about it, consider one specific example of where thats likely to happen: education spending.

For decades now, spending on public education has been rising steadily, well out of line with increases in student enrollment (which has risen much more modestly) or standardized test scores (which have been mostly flat). Yet, the only refrain we hear from the education establishment is that our schools are underfunded.

We hear that even now, with costs related to the pandemic offered as a reason. Thats not really a reason. Its an excuse.

Georgia has 180 city and county school districts. After the 2019 fiscal year, the last one completed before the pandemic, their collective financial reserves were almost $3.2 billion. A year later, after the brutal first few months of the pandemic, and the attendant costs of moving suddenly to virtual platforms such as WiFi hotspots and laptops for students, that number was wait for it almost $3.8 billion.

Thats right: Georgia school districts collective reserves increased by more than $600 million even as things were collapsing all around them.

To be fair, not every district fared so well. Thirty-five districts saw their fund balances fall, some by several million dollars. But far more enjoyed increases, by more than $1 million apiece for almost half of the districts.

Its true that districts have since weathered two years of austerity cuts to their state funding, totaling almost $730 million. Even so, thats a fraction of the nearly $6.8 billion theyve received so far in federal emergency funding.

Add it all up changes in reserve funds, decreases in state funding and surges of federal funding and Georgias school districts are better off by more than $6.6 billion. Thats most of the way toward doubling their annual state funding. And every single district, even the ones that spent down some of their reserves, was net positive.

If you believe the education establishment will simply watch that money disappear, Ive got a desert in southeast Georgia to sell you.

It wont be long before we hear this money described not gratefully as a lifeline during a difficult time, but solemnly as how we should have been funding education all along.

There will be little accounting for how it was spent or what it achieved. Itll just become the baseline against which all future education spending is measured.

For once, Id prefer we prove Ronald Reagan wrong.

Link:

Wingfield: Reagan's words on government programs still ring true - Savannah Morning News

A Georgia House committee on Thursday debated how much power social media companies should have to control content.

It comes as some Republicans notably former President Donald Trump have been banned for posting inflammatory statements.

Theres consensus among lawmakers that obscene posts or those that incite violence should not be allowed. But when it comes to opinions such as the false claims by Trump and his supporters that the Georgia election was stolen there is less clarity about where social media companies should draw the line.

James Taylor with the libertarian think-tank The Heartland Institute spoke before the House Science & Technology Committee. He says the First Amendment should be interpreted broadly.

Its more than simply a prohibition against government restricting our unalienable rights, Taylor said. It is an embodiment of our rights that cannot be taken away by any entity.

Taylor says more than 30 states are considering legislation to address what he calls censorship by social media companies. He says some of those bills have been proposed by Democrats.

When tech companies choose to become involved in the 21st century version of the public square and decide who or what points of view may be shared, I think thats very troubling, said Taylor.

Democratic Rep. Viola Davis says she values protecting free speech but also has concerns about the effects of hate speech and the incitement of violence.

When do we cross that line? And when do we hold people accountable that cross that line? asked Davis.

Democratic state Rep. Shea Roberts says terms of use agreements clearly spell out what social media companies can and cant do.

I dont see how thats different than other private companies making choices about how they want to run their business, said Roberts.

She also says there are countless other social media platforms for people to use if they disagree with the rules set out by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

Rep. Chuck Martin, a Republican, says social media companies should not favor one political viewpoint over the other. But he also cautions about government getting involved.

This is just something that one has to look and be very careful that theres not an overstep and be very careful that we dont express our subjectivity over the top of another set of subjectivity, Martin said. Because by doing that, were not making it any better, and we could actually be making it worse.

The committee did not discuss or propose any specific pieces of legislation Thursday.

Chairman Ed Setzler, a Republican, says he plans more hearings before deciding how or even if state lawmakers have a role to play in regulating social media.

We do well to define, Is there a problem, whats the nature of the problem, and if there is a problem, is it something the Legislature should address? Maybe we shouldnt, said Setzler.

Read more:

Georgia Lawmakers Grapple With Role Of Social Media Companies And Free Speech | 90.1 FM WABE - WABE 90.1 FM

Evan McMullin, a conservative ex-CIA analyst so disgusted with former President Donald Trump that he launched an independent presidential campaign in 2016, got on 11 state ballots, and finished in fifth place with 0.5 percent of the popular vote, has co-announced on Thursday a "new political movement" of 150 mostly right-of-center political figures, including former Massachusetts Gov. Bill Weld, former Rep. Joe Walsh (RIll.), and former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, three conservatives so disgusted with Trump that they ran against him in the 2020 GOP presidential primary and lost by a combined 93 percentage points.

In a joint letter precipitated by the removal of Rep. Liz Cheney (RWyo.) from Republican leadership in the House of Representatives, and patterned consciously after the Declaration of Independence, McMullin and his anti-Trump co-signatories "declare our intent to catalyze an American renewal, and to either reimagine a party dedicated to our founding ideals or else hasten the creation of such an alternative."

As a political project, the would-be catalyzers face extremely long odds. The playing field of American politics these past six years has been littered with the corpses of failed or stillborn attempts to challenge Trump from the right. The only lasting third-party alternative in that span "dedicated to our founding ideals" is one that has put in a half-century of grunt work to get one percent of the vote.

But as a media and fundraising initiative, the effort may find more fertile terrain. McMullin's co-organizer of American Renewal is Miles Taylor, a government security analyst known mostly for being the anonymous author of the 2018 New York Times op-ed "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration," which he then spun into the bestselling 2019 book A Warning. In August 2020, a no-longer-anonymous Taylor accused his former boss of "playingon the Russian team and not the American team," and filmed a two-minute advertisement for Republican Voters Against Trump, a project launched by the 501(c)(4) group Republicans for the Rule of Law, which was co-founded by veteran Washington commentator and political schemer Bill Kristol.

"I'm still a Republican, but I'm hanging on by the skin of my teeth because how quickly the party has divorced itself from truth and reason," Taylor told The New York Times this week. "I'm one of those in the group that feels very strongly that if we can't get the G.O.P. back to a rational party that supports free minds, free markets, and free people, I'm out and a lot of people are coming with me."

Those people attracted to such concepts as truth, reason, "free minds," and "free markets" may find themselves nodding along to some of the principles espoused in the letter, especially if they have a strong stomach for portentous language. (The first line of the declaration reads: "These United States, born of noble convictions and aspiring to high purpose, have been an exemplar of self-government to humankind.")

McMullin, Taylor, & Co. favor "open, market-based economiesconsistent with our natural liberty," reject "populism and illiberalism, whether of the right or the left," and stress that "it is the prerogative of all to make personal decisions in accordance with their free will." They want to welcome lawful immigrants, keep regulation limited, and protect property rights. So far, so unobjectionable.

Where the manifesto begins to diverge most sharply from the Libertarian Party platform is the unspecific yet ambitious paragraph titled "Leadership": "Having thrived in the abundance of a choice land, we believe that these United States must work in conjunction with friends and allies to advance worthy interests abroad and to promote freedom by example and with the judicious application of power."

This passage, in a document arranged by two security-state veterans, and unveiled in the service of supporting Liz Cheney, is a good prompt to cross-check some of the names on the bottom of the petition. Sure enough, #NeverTrump 6.0 is endorsed by several people with fingerprints all over an activist foreign policy.

There is Michael Hayden, former director of both the CIA and the National Security Agency, who lied to Congress about torture programs, has likened air strikes to "casual sex," and made jokes about putting Edward Snowden on a kill list. There is former national intelligence director and serial ambassador to geostrategic countries (Honduras in the 1980s, Iraq in the aughts) John Negroponte, former State Department counselor and World War IV booster Eliot A. Cohen, and former Department of Homeland Security chief and indefinite-detention enthusiast Michael Chertoff, among several other lesser-known veterans of the George W. Bush administration.

Many of these same people lent their names to anti-Trump efforts in 2016 on foreign policy grounds, then cheered on the Russia-related investigations that dogged the 45th president, and are now threatening to start their own party if Trumpism isn't sufficiently cleansed from the GOP.

That pro-market anti-Trumpers are talking about a third party while ignoring the Libertarians, even though one of the signatories (Weld) ran as the L.P. vice presidential nominee as recently as 2016, touches on each of the three main obstacles to herding Trump-averse non-Democrats into anything like a single tent.

1) The three biggest anti-Trump blocs are ideologically incompatible. It has been clear since the dawn of the Trump era that opposition to the crudely mannered America First mercantilist would come most intensely from foreign policy hawks (John McCain, John Kasich, Bill Kristol), libertarian-leaners (Justin Amash, Mark Sanford, George Will), and Mormons (Evan McMullin, Mitt Romney, Jeff Flake).

While Latter-day Saints members can swing between hawkery and dovery (just think of the significant ideological split between Utah's Republican delegation to the U.S. Senate), the fault lines are obvious: Libertarians and neocons generally dislike one another, and even the most loosey-goosey of Mormons have a hard time embracing the full legal logic of personal autonomy for consenting adults. Any movement that requires these camps to get along will likely be short-term and transactional, not unlike the 2016 third-party voters who in 2020 held their noses to vote for President Joe Biden.

2) Noisy anti-Trumpism is mostly incompatible with holding elected office as a Republican. The American Renewal letter signatures look like the roster of a political reunion for the Class of '95. In addition to two-time Massachusetts Gov. Weld, there's former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, former California Rep. Tom Campbell, former Minnesota Gov. Arne Carlson, former Oklahoma Rep. Mickey Edwards, former Maryland Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, and dozens of others unburdened by the need to win reelection from the modern Republican electorate.

Of the vanishingly few current office-holders on the list, they tend to share a rare characteristic: recent defection from the GOP. Jim Hendren was the Republican majority leader of the Arkansas Senate until this January, when, disgusted by the Capitol riot, he stepped down from leadership, and then the next month left the party altogether. And California State Assemblyman Chad Mayes, the former Republican minority leader, left the party in late 2019 after drawing fire for his criticisms of Trump.

Prior to his departure, Mayes engaged in the kind of Third Way/No Labels activity common among many signatories of the American Renewal letter. From his Wikipedia page:

In January 2018, Mayes formed "New Way California," aiming to broaden the appeal of the Republican Party by advocating for "individual freedom, shared responsibility, educational excellence, environmental stewardship, efficient government and an open economy." The group has been publicly supported by former governorArnold Schwarzenegger, and both Mayes and Schwarzenegger along withOhio governorJohn Kasich headlined the group's inaugural summit inLos Angeleson March 21.The summit was criticized by some in theCalifornia Republican Party, including former chairman Ron Nehring, who described them as "elites talking down to grassroots voters."

As an independent and non-fan of Trump, I share the Renewalists' embarrassment at mainstream GOP fear of crossing Trump voters. Yet that is the world we live in. If you want to hold office as a Republican, and spend any measurable amount of time criticizing the former president, you better have a safe seat, stature, and bank vaults full of cash. Even then, you're going to get booed.

3) At a time of intense negative polarization, centrist scolds are popular mostly in limited corners of the media, and among opportunistic anti-Trump partisans. See: Jeff Flake, Howard Schultz, John Kasich, etc.

Arguably the most successful anti-Trump centrist initiative, at least as measured by revenue and media reach, has been The Lincoln Project, a political action committee of former GOP political operatives that raised scores of millions of dollars from Democrats to run anti-Trump ads in 2020. The project has been dogged by all kinds of scandal and controversy, particularly after the election was safely delivered to Biden.

Three of the American Renewal signatoriesGeorge Conway, Jennifer Horn, and Mike Madridwere co-founders of The Lincoln Project; former Michigan GOP executive Jeff Timmer, too, has been a key member. Evan McMullin's most likely path to success lies less in the direction of dreary third-party construction, and more in a Lincoln Project-style initiative to raise money and make noise about the Republican Party's regnant Trumpism.

But there's an obstacle on that road, too. America's high alert about Trump has nowhere to go but down. The man is not the president, he is not going to be the president, and most people worried about such have moved on with their lives. Sure, I would love to see a GOP that explicitly rejects its most internally popular figure, just as I would love to see a Democratic Party worried about the national debt. In either case, the short-term chances of that happening are the same: slim, none, and fat.

More:

Will a Coalition of Hawks, Mormons, and Libertarian-Leaners Form a New Third Party? - Reason

If I am ever asked, Boris Johnson once wrote of ID cards, on the streets of London, or in any other venue, public or private, to produce my ID card as evidence that I am who I say I am, when I have done nothing wrong and am simply ambling along and breathing Gods fresh air like any other freeborn Englishman, then I will take that card out of my wallet and physically eat it in the presence of whatever emanation of the state has demanded I produce it.

Righto. Well, in a plot twist worthy of Dial-A-Plot-Twist, the emanation of the state turns out to be Boris Johnson himself. Yes, despite the warnings and objections of civil liberties campaigners and race equality campaigners indeed, despite in-person voter fraud being effectively nonexistent in the UK - Johnsons government is pushing ahead with legislation to introduce mandatory voter ID at elections. We know these plans are illiberal because the traditional hero of a Boris Johnson column namely, Boris Johnson has already opposed them.

Of course, in Johnsons published oeuvre, freeborn Englishmen are forever being admired for doing exuberantly freeborn things like beating the hedgerows with staves even as Johnsons government seeks to ban any protest that is too noisy or somehow annoying. In Johnsons canon, the praises are forever being sung of peasants blind drunk on non-EU approved scrumpy and yet, the authors very first act as London mayor was to immediately outlaw drinking on the Tube. I sometimes wonder if Boris Johnson is a committed civil libertarian in the same way Im a peerless opening batsman for England.

The nagging doubt certainly crossed my mind as I sat in front of his latest podium address on Monday night, for which the dear old British public were once again invited to press their noses up against their TV sets and marvel appreciatively as the soy Churchill graciously bestowed upon them his very qualified permission to hug their own family and friends.

Each stage of the Covid pandemic has brought its fresh hells, but one of the most absolutely objectionable parts of unlocking is having to look grateful as the prime minister meagrely parcels out what have been standard freedoms since time immemorial, and hands them back to us like theyre some kind of special present entirely in his gift. As for the ancient rights Johnson did remove, we have been without them far longer than we would have had to be, had the prime minister not been a slave to his own ancient inability to make a tactical decision in good time last autumn.

Anyway, back to the Downing Street gifting suite. Having failed to break it gently to people that they were running out of government-sanctioned excuses not to have to see their relatives, Johnson swept on to the business of policing those who planned to. To wit: Hugging. (In fact, hugging has never been against the law.) You should do it if you think its appropriate, intoned a PM whose intimacy history has always been the benchmark of what is proper, and if you think the risks are very, very low. But you should exercise care and common sense. Increasingly, the only appropriate reply to this is: thanks, but Ill do what I want, Cuck Norris.

As for the continued banning of dancing at weddings, it does seem preposterous that a man with Johnsons self-image should think it remotely appropriate to be standing up on a day where there were four Covid deaths in the UK and acting like the preacher dad in Footloose. I was amused to stumble across a subsequent tweet addressed to Johnson by a member of the public who had just bleeding had it with this nonsense. Maybe you dont want to get married yourself, she said pointedly, but many other people do! And you know, now she puts it like that perhaps it does rather read like the subconscious rearguard action of someone trying to stall their own nuptials. Of COURSE I want to get married, darling but lets wait till we can have 500 people and they can celebrate us rhythmically, as they would only yearn for. (I wonder wholl eventually pay for the wedding? At this stage of murk, lets just count ourselves lucky if Downing Street rules out a petro-state.)

Mindful of Johnsons endless perversions of the term common sense, let us return to this suspiciously unnecessary business of voter ID. Yesterday a Downing Street spokesman was insisting that you already need photo ID to pick up a parcel. When it was pointed out to this committed non-elitist that, as everyone normal knows, you dont actually need photo ID to do this, journalists were then directed towards Post Office guidance that states youd need photo ID if you wished to pick up a parcel for, say, your grandmother. So do make sure to take your card along when you vote for her.

Speaking of the post, there are undoubtedly problems with fraudulent postal voting and yet the Conservatives are, strangely, not doing anything about that one. Perhaps, like complicating in-person voting, postal voting is one of those things generally judged to favour the Tories. (In recent years, incidentally, the main thing that favours the Tories is the Labour party.)

As for the governments decision to flirt with complications that can lead to voter suppression, it calls to mind the joke John Oliver made back in 2013, in response to whatever was that years attempt to roll back US voting rights. Among those pushing hard to overturn electoral liberties was the state of North Carolina, where there had been precisely one documented case of in-person voter fraud during the previous presidential election. The problem isnt people showing up and not being who they say they are, Oliver pointed out. Its person. As in one. Singular. One guy, out of four and a half million people who voted in the last election. You could have got the same result from just passing a bill that said, Dave cant vote, he knows why.

Likewise in todays UK. In 2019 there was ONE conviction for in-person voter fraud in the entire UK, handed to a man who had voted twice in the European parliament elections (arguably even more pointless than it was to vote once). Yet the government is pressing ahead with legislation to spend a conservatively estimated 20m per election on stopping something that isnt even meaningfully occurring. What sort of a return on your investment is that for the party of business? The only reasonable conclusion is that the investment is in fact in a system that will end up favouring the Conservatives. Think of them as the party of funny business, and it all makes common sense.

Excerpt from:

Johnson the civil libertarian wants to have his voter ID card and eat it - MSN UK

A collage of New York City mayor candidates.

Hedge fund billionaires, charter school boosters and prominent labor unions are pouring cash into the New York City mayors race contributing to a record haul intended to shape the outcome of the election at the same time new reforms seek to limit the influence of money in politics.

A decade after the U.S. Supreme Court flung open the doors to unlimited special-interest money in elections, the Democratic primary is being infiltrated at every turn, with an unprecedented $11 million already committed in TV ads, according to a POLITICO review of spending calculated by AdImpact.

That total has already surpassed the $8 million spent to promote and attack candidates the last time the mayors seat was open in 2013 a figure that accounted for both the primary and the general election that year.

It is kind of an arms race between the citys Campaign Finance Board and the political money trying to find a way around it, said John Kaehny of good-government group Reinvent Albany.

With five weeks until the election, checks are flowing from divergent wings of the ideological spectrum.

One recent contributor who provided $500,000 in seed money for a PAC supporting Andrew Yang has backed conservative politicians like U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley. Cruz was among a handful of Republicans who applauded Yangs public statement on fighting in Israel last week.

Pro-Yang donor Jeff Yass, co-founder of investment firm Susquehanna International Group, also bankrolled a PAC pushing a debunked claim that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump.

A Pennsylvania resident who has sought to distance himself from Protect Freedom PACs Stop the Steals messaging, Yass told POLITICO he does not believe the election was stolen. He said he was enticed by Yangs support for charter schools and his criticism of teachers unions.

I thought he would be the best guy for school choice, Yass said in a recent interview.

The billionaire is a self-described libertarian who saw somewhat of a kindred spirit in Yang.

Andrew has a lot of libertarian leanings, Yass said. He is not quite a libertarian, to say the least, but he has those leanings.

Yass was the first reported contributor to Comeback PAC an effort by public relations consultant Lis Smith, who set a $6 million goal to counter any negative advertisements against one of the leading candidates in the eight-way race.

Gabe Tobias, who is running a rival PAC intended to blunt Yangs momentum, criticized the contribution.

Far-right mega-donor Jeff Yass found in Andrew Yang the same thing [consultant] Bradley Tusk did: An empty vessel for corporate power, Tobias said. How can New Yorkers trust a candidate with so little substance and so many conflicts of interest?

Tobias, meanwhile, has run into difficulty securing funds for his Our City PAC. As of Monday evening he had raised just $43,500, including $10,000 from writer and activist Susan Ochshorn, who also fundraised for candidate Maya Wileys campaign.

This week Wiley got a promised $1 million boost from George Soros of Open Society Foundations and healthcare workers union 1199SEIU. Both are closely tied to Patrick Gaspard, who is advising Wileys bid; 1199 endorsed her in February.

Tobias said his own fundraising efforts are hampered by his self-imposed ban on donors in the real estate and fossil fuel industries, as well as police unions.

I think the fundraising differential between us and some of the other super PACs is a reflection of the tilted playing field between progressive candidates and those that are aligned with corporate interests, he said.

Not so for Wall Street executive Ray McGuire.

A PAC supporting his first-time candidacy received its second round of donations from John Hess last week, boosting the oil magnates total contribution to $1 million. New York For Ray also received $30,000 from the Rudin family of dynastic real estate fame.

In total, the pro-McGuire effort has locked in $6 million, though it has yet to boost him in the polls: The latest survey released Monday night reported McGuire winning just 4 percent of voters.

Four other charter school supporters, including hedge-funders Kenneth Griffin and Daniel Loeb, have contributed a combined $2 million to a PAC backing Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams campaign. The organization began airing a TV ad last week highlighting Adams history as a police captain who was abused by cops as a teenager.

Griffin and Loeb also contributed $500,000 each to Smiths PAC an indication they view both Adams and Yang as beneficial to the nontraditional schools that are at odds with the United Federation of Teachers. Charter school growth is capped by state legislation but mayors can advocate against them, as Bill de Blasio did upon taking office.

Not to be outdone, the UFTs parent union has already pumped $1 million into NY4Kids, which is running ads for its preferred candidate, City Comptroller Scott Stringer.

One donor is on track to single-handedly outspend every campaign and PAC by at least a 2-to-1 margin, according to the latest projections from AdImpact.

Michael Donovan has shelled out $6.8 million to New Start NYC, in hopes of propelling his son Shaun, a first-time political candidate, to Gracie Mansion. The PAC has already booked $5.5 million in ads.

To put that in perspective, Michael Donovan has given $1 million more than all of the 14,966 donors to Yangs campaign combined as of the last disclosure in March. And his largesse is 133,233 percent more than what would be allowed if he only donated to his sons campaign under rules designed to curtail monied interests.

In an interview with POLITICO, Donovan indicated hes closing his wallet.

I think the message is out there, and I think this is about what we needed, he said last week, noting he has accomplished his goal of trying to boost his sons name recognition though his namesake is still polling in the single digits.

Donovans generosity briefly stalled his sons campaign, as city regulators halted his matching funds while investigating whether there was any illegal coordination between the PAC and the candidate. The probe, sparked by a complaint from Stringer, concluded there was no wrongdoing.

A PAC funded by the Hotel Trades Council and its parent organization has raised $2.2 million, and plans to spend much of that supporting Adams.

Meanwhile, a committee that appears to cater to the political whims of Knicks owner James Dolan has raised $2.7 million, almost exclusively from his own organization.

The flow of outside money takes place against the backdrop of an election meant to blunt the influence of special interests. The citys campaign finance system, already lauded by government reformers, is imposing a stricter limit on individual donations and expanding the amount of taxpayer-backed matching funds this year. Voters approved the changes, proposed by de Blasio, in a 2018 referendum.

Despite the unlimited contributions, candidates are still relying most on standard donations regulated by the city Campaign Finance Board. So far donors have given $23.3 million in the race and the board has more than doubled that through an 8-to-1 matching funds system.

These PACs are giant slush funds that rich people can create to support the candidate of their choice, Kaehny said. They are a serious threat to the campaign finance system here.

See more here:

Special interests flood the mayor's race as candidates race to the finish line - Politico

Matthew McConaughey has been quietly making calls to political experts as he weighs up whether to run for Governor of Texas, according to a report.

The Oscar-winning actor, 51, revealed in an interview last month that he wasconsidering a run for Governor of Texas in 2022 but did not reveal for which party .

Reactions ranged from joyful enthusiasm of fans and those impressed by his recent Texas winterstorm reliefdrive and gun-control campaigns, to stark warnings tostay out of Texas politics and eye-rolls in established Republican and Democratic political circles in the Lone Star State.

Now, insiders have toldPoliticothat the Hollywood star has quietly started making calls to political experts to take the temperature before he decides whether to throw his hat in the ring and run against current Republican Governor Greg Abbott, 63, who has indicated that he will seek a third term.

The Independent has contacted Mr McConaugheys representative for comment.

Republican strategist, Karl Rove, said of Mr McConaugheys potential run: I find it improbable, but its not out of the question.

He added: The question is: Would he run as a Republican? A Democrat? Independent? And where is he on the political scale? He says he has a funny phrase about being a hardcore centrist, but what party would he run under?

Matthew Dowd, founder of Country Over Party and former chief strategist on the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign, told Politico: I think theres an impression of, Do we really need another celebrity candidate in the midst of this?

But Brendan Steinhauser, an Austin-based GOP strategist, said: Im a little more surprised that people arent taking him more seriously, honestly. Celebrity in this country counts for a lot its not like some C-list actor no one likes. He has an appeal.

When Mr McConaughey first mooted a run earlier this year, many dismissed him as yet another inexperienced, Hollywood star interfering in politics and warned him not to look to the increasingly long list of celebrities-turned-politicians - former presidents Donald Trump andRonald Reagan; and former California governorArnold Schwarzenegger, as his role-models.

CNNpolitical analyst Jim Moore warned theTrue Detectivestar: You are not prepared. Be kind to your state and yourself. Stick with what you know.

But following a March Gallup poll that revealed a record-high 62 per cent of Americans feel that a third party option is needed, some have started eyeing the A-lister from Austin, who has refused to align as a Republican or Democrat, as a potential candidate.

On 10 March, The Libertarian Party of Texas, the state arm of the USs third most popular party, tweeted: Hey, @McConaughey, can we talk?

Matthew McConaughey speaks during "One World: Together At Home" presented by Global Citizen on April, 18, 2020

(Getty Images for Global Citizen)

Third, or minor, parties have historically performed poorly in American politics. This is largely attributed to first-past-the-post (FPTP), which favours a two-party system, creating less room for smaller parties who cannot gain any representation without an outright win.

Since 1990, just six (2 per cent) of governors out of 369 have been elected from minor parties. The most recent was Alaskas Bill Walker, a Republican turned Independent, who merged his campaign with Democratic nominee Byron Mallott in 2014. He dropped out of the 2018 race after low polling.

Only 53 Independent candidates for governor (14 per cent) have won at least 5 per cent of the vote.

An Independent, third-party candidate has never won a presidential election, not counting fresident George Washington who ran as an Independent but supported by the Federalist party.

Only once did a major party come third in a general election. In 1912, former president Theodore Roosevelt, represented by the Progressive Party, surpassed the Republicans to come second but was beaten by the Democrat Woodrow Wilson.

Not exactly a rounding endorsement for Mr McConaughey to run as a third-party nominee.

But Bekah Congdon, vice-chair of the Texas arm of the Libertarian Party, who tweeted at Mr McConaughey and is hoping to set up a meeting, said that following what some see as disappointing leadership by Republican Abbott, there may be an opportunity.

She told The Independent: Texas has for so long felt like a completely red state and we know its not. It has been about 26 years since a Democrat won a statewide electron here [Ann Richards 1991-1995] so its clear we have been stuck in one way of thinking for such a long time and that is holding us back as a state.

Founded in 1971 following the Watergate scandal and Vietnam War, the Libertarians focus on the rights of individuals over government intervention. They bill themselves as culturally liberal and fiscally conservative, supporting same-sex marriage but also gun-rights (which Ms Congdon admits might not align with the actors previous campaigns on gun-control).

In 2016 the party appeared to be on the rise. It counted two ex-governors as its presidential candidates and received 4.5million (3.3 per cent) votes in its most successful national election result ever.

But in 2020, following a polarising four years, its popularity faded. Libertarian vice presidential candidate, Spike Cohen, who promised free ponies and zombie power, and presidential nominee Jo Jorgensen won just 1.86million votes (1.18 per cent).

Ms Congdon said that Mr McConaughey appealed because of his independent spirit.

He isnt Republican or Democrat and does a lot of pointing out negatives and positives on both sides. Wanting to stop nasty political rhetoric and bridge that divide, she said.

It has been building over the years as he has become more vocal here. He is someone who is relatable, someone who people like and respect, and has an enviable platform.

Speaking toThe Longview News Journal in March, Mr McConaughey said he was serious about the right leadership role but was put off by bipartisan politics.

He said: For me, I need politics to define its purpose before I would choose it as a possible lane for me to pursue. I dont know that politics is my category where I would be the most useful I am looking for where I would be the most useful and it may be that I could be more useful as a free agent.

He then gave a trademark, rambling monologue in which he appeared to endorse a third option, outside of mainstream politics.

Ive said this analogy a few times before, but someone told me: There aint nothing in the middle but dead armadillos and yellow lines. I said, Well, Im walking right down the yellow lines, right in the middle of the highway right now. And the armadillos are free having a great time, because right now, both sides are so far to the right or the left, there arent even tires on the pavement.

Ms Congdon concluded: Its hard to tell if hes serious, but were here for it if he is.

Born in Uvalde, Texas in 1969, the actor hit the big time in 1993s coming-of-age film, Dazed and Confused, before starring in a slew of critically-panned romantic comedies in the 2000s that painted him as a talentless hunk known for giving winding, nonsensical interviews and his catchphrase: Alright, alright, alright.

In the 2010s the actor, who was once arrested for playing the bongos naked, launched a comeback which he called a McConaissance, appearing in multiple hits including The Wolf of Wall Street in 2013 and winning an Academy Award for his role in Dallas Buyers Club in 2014.

Over the last few years the actor, along with other Texas-born stars like Beyonc and Sandra Bullock, has become increasingly active in civic life in his home state. In the wake of disasters, he has made large financial donations and been boots-on-the-ground with his foundation, Just Keep Livin, that opened in 2008.

Matthew McConaughey makes plea for Hollywood to embrace Donald Trump

In 2017 he ruffled feathers when he called for the entertainment industry to get behind Donald Trump and be constructive during his presidency.

A year later he spoke at gun-control rally, March for Our Lives, where heurged law-abiding, gun owners to take one for the teamand give up some of their gun rights.

At the start of the Covid pandemic, the city of Austin broadcast the Matt Signal, using the well-liked actor in a series of PSA ads to persuade residents to stay at home and practise social distancing.

In fall 2020, signs of a potential political future for Mr McConaughey began to emerge. The star, who was appointed Minister for Culture and visiting film professor by his alma mater, the University of Texas, in 2019, started to tell multiple media outlets that he was looking for a leadership role where he can effect change.

When a freak snowstorm hit Texas in February and crippled the states power grid, leaving thousands of residents without heat and electricity, Mr McConaughey was one of several Texas-born celebrities to fundraise.

Soon afterwards, the magazine,Texas Monthly, published a piece titled Matthew McConaughey and Beyonc Did More for Texas Than Ted Cruz lambasting the disgraced Texas senator who was caught breaking lockdown rules to escape the storm with a trip to a Cancun, Mexico.

In April, after months of denying it, the actor casually told Houston-based podcast, The Balanced Voice, that running against Gov. Abbott in 2022, is a true consideration.

On social media his mooted run has received mixed reviews. Some are calling for Beto or bust, referring to Beto ORourke, the Democratic politician who lost the Texas Senate race to Mr Cruz in 2018 and the presidential nomination in 2020.

But even if Mr McConaughey declined the invitation from the Libertarians (whose own candidate selection system would be his first hurdle) many believe there could still be space for a third party, or a high-profile, Independent candidate.

The most recent high-profile success story is Vermonts Bernie Sanders, the longest-serving Independent senator, who has switched back and forth between Independent and Democrat several times.

While his 2016 and 2020 Democrat presidential runs were unsuccessful, some analysts credit Senator Sanders grassroots campaigns with pushing the party further left.

In March a New York Times op-ed conceded that the time may be right for a third-party of the liberal centre to rise, showing respect for the outcome of elections, the rule of law [and] freedom of speech but scepticism of identity politics ... dictators and demagogues.

Conservative columnist Bret Stephens wrote: This is not a political party, yet. But it could be the seeds of a party.

Alright, alright, alright.

Continued here:

Matthew McConaughey is 'making calls' as he mulls a run for Texas governor - The Independent

Ligonier Democrat Mariah Fisher, Unity Republican Leslie Baum Rossi and Ligonier Libertarian Robb Luther will square off Tuesday in a special election to fill the vacancy in the 59th Legislative District created by the Jan. 2 death of state Rep. Mike Reese.

Reese, a 42-year-old Republican rising star from Mt. Pleasant, was elected to a seventh term with no opposition last fall. He died unexpectedly Jan. 2 of an apparent brain aneurysm.

Party committee members in the 59th District, which includes 42 precincts in eastern Westmoreland County and 10 in western Somerset County, selected Fisher and Rossi from a slate of candidates who sought to represent their parties in the special election.

The position pays $90,000 a year.

Fisher, 39, a Ligonier Council member, and Rossi, 50, the creator of the Trump House, have been active in local politics in the district.

Unlike the ballot in the closed primary May 18, which is limited to party members, all registered voters in the 59th Legislative District may cast ballots in the special election.

Fisher was elected to council in 2017. The Ligonier Valley native and self-employed wedding photographer is a graduate of Dickinson College. She worked as an AmeriCorps volunteer, serving at-risk youth, and later as a paralegal before transitioning to photography so she could be home for her sons, 8 and 11.

Her experience on council includes overseeing the public safety committee and helping initiate Ligoniers first National Night Out, a collaboration with the police department and local volunteer fire companies. She said shes also gained experience balancing a budget, both as a small businesswoman and chair of the borough finance committee.

As a lawmaker, she said her priorities would include working to support public schools and affordable health care, promoting the regions natural beauty and investing in public infrastructure, especially rural broadband.

Getting better internet access for our rural communities is important. With the pandemic, we came to realize how we need to be connected to each other on a broader scale, Fisher said. I have heard families with children drove to our library and used our library connection and the connection in our Diamond, which is wired for Wi-Fi. We need to make sure all citizens have broadband access.

Rossi came on the political scene in 2016 when she created the Trump House. Last year, she reprised her role at the red, white and blue landmark on Route 982, near Youngstown, where she helped register voters and promote Donald Trumps reelection campaign with the thousands of visitors who trekked to the house with the giant cutout of Trump outside. She also served as a delegate to the Republican National Committee.

The mother of eight is a Westmoreland County native. She works beside her husband in her familys development business, renovating homes in the Latrobe area.

Like Fisher, she spent the spring knocking on doors, campaigning and visiting with voters throughout the area. She touts her pro-business bona fides, a pro-life stand and support for the Second Amendment.

Im a strong conservative. Im not in the middle. Im far right. I wear my colors on my sleeve. I feel like Im the voice of the people, she said.

Rossi is among those who hope voters will vote yes on two constitutional amendments to limit the governors power to unilaterally declare a state of emergency to 21 days.

Luther, 46, is a political newcomer on the third-party ticket. He did not respond to calls for comment. In a statement to Ballotpedia, he identified as a ninth-generation Ligonier Valley native and a partner in a digital marketing firm and the owner of a hobby farmstead. He identified his priorities as reducing taxes, limiting emergency powers and defending constitutional rights.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, derdley@triblive.com or via Twitter .

Visit link:

3 candidates vie to fill vacancy in 59th district special election - TribLIVE

Robb Luthers campaign has announced that the Libertarian candidate will appear on the May 18 special election ballot for a vacant House seat in Pennsylvanias 59th Legislative District.

Luther, 46, a Ligonier Valley native, said he is vying to represent ordinary Pennsylvanians who feel left behind by the Commonwealths government.

He advocates placing reasonable checks on gubernatorial emergency powers to protect the economy from arbitrary shutdowns, maximizing school choice by putting education dollars directly into the hands of teachers and families, and ending the property tax to enable true homeownership.

As a lifelong native of Ligonier Valley, Luther said he is invested in the community and understands the unique challenges and needs of its people.

Ligonier Valley is my home, and has been for my entire life, he said. Im proud to have raised a family here. Like you, I want it to be a place where our children and families can thrive and prosper. I know that fostering a business-friendly environment and allowing our people to control their own money will lead us to financial stability.

Luther is a ninth-generation resident of Ligonier, who has lived in the Valley his whole life, where he and his wife raised four children, according to his campaign website. Hes currently a partner at a fast-growing digital marketing firm in Pittsburgh.

Like many other Pennsylvanians, Ive become concerned by the direction our state government is headed in, and the impact some of its decisions have had on our community, Luther said. Were faced with real challenges, and we need solutions that tap into the potential of our people not ones that trample over their choices and freedoms. That means getting leadership that understands how our community feels its actions.

Luther is running for the House seat left vacant by the death of Mike Reese, who died Jan. 2 of an apparent brain aneurysm. He was elected for a seventh-term in the state House of Representatives, running unopposed in the November election.

Leslie Baum Rossi, of Latrobe, earned the Rublicican nomination in the special election, while Mariah Fisher, a Ligonier Borough councilwoman, was selected as the Democratic candidate.

As your voice in Harrisburg, Ill work to ease the burden of taxes and regulations on our people, put choices in education back into the hands of teachers and families, and ensure our rights are safeguarded, he said. Together, I know well accomplish real change for our district.

View post:

Robb Luther to appear as Libertarian candidate on ballot for 59th District seat - latrobebulletinnews.com