Category Archives: Liberal

Princeton University Professor John Ikenberry, one of the most articulate defenders of the open, rules-based system that dominates international politics today, claims that the past two centuries should be remembered as the liberal ascendancy. In this narrative, conservatives have become economic liberals, socialists have become social liberals, the institutions that regulate international affairs have proliferated and strengthened, and liberal values have been promoted across the globe with increasing vigour.

Brexit and the election of Donald Trump have led many to conclude that this liberal order is in crisis. The likes of Ikenberry would disagree: They claim that crises only serve to provide greater incentives to cooperate in rules-based ways. In other words, we are simply living through the growing pains of liberalism.

An examination of liberalisms conceptual foundations, however, may lend credence to a more pessimistic outlook.

Liberalism is a philosophy that originated at the domestic level, gaining its full form as a political movement during the Enlightenment. Although it has made numerous important contributions toward advancing the rights of individuals, nations, women and minorities in the centuries since, it can be faulted for possessing several inherent contradictions and shaky assumptions.

Chief among them is the idea that society is composed solely of rational individuals, primarily concerned with the advancement of their own material well-being. This is a notion that has become particularly mainstream in Western politics since former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatchers neoliberal revolution. Mediating institutions between the individual and the statesuch as families, religious organizations and civic associationsare often downplayed.

This liberal hypothesis is easy to criticize. For example, after the election that brought Trump to the Oval Office, the New York Times Ross Douthat explained that liberal societies have always depended on an illiberal or pre-liberal substructure to answer the varied human needsmeaning, belonging, a vertical dimension to human life, a hope against mortality [] People have a desire for solidarity that cosmopolitanism does not satisfy, immaterial interests that redistribution cannot meet, a yearning for the sacred that secularism cannot answer.

Perhaps one of liberalisms more profound contradictions lies in the fact that, although it professes a commitment to enhancing individual freedom and agency, it has a deeply structuralist view of the world. That is to say, if only the right institutions are designed and the right values are promoted, then humans will exhibit predictable behaviour, and cultural and class differences can be overcome.

This is manifested most clearly by liberals at the domestic level, who in many countries have had difficulty grappling with questions ranging from immigration to income inequality. But it is also true of liberal internationalism: As the norms it promotes and the institutions it upholds begin to grapple with the more persistent realities of history and geography, the inconsistencies of liberal world order have been brought clearly to the fore.

Liberal internationalists believe in both the self-determination of nations and the inviolability of states territorial integrity, in both human rights and state sovereignty, in both international integration and democratic accountability, and in both global leadership by a concert of democracies and representative international institutions that feature non-democratic members. Inevitably, then, liberals have been selective in the application of their principles, as has become painfully evident in recent decades.

Playing somewhat fast and loose with the rules, Western countries intervened in Yugoslavia and Iraq without UN sanction in 1999 and 2003 respectively, recognized Kosovos unilateral declaration of independence over Moscows objections in 2008, and used a mandate to protect civilians to force regime change in Libya in 2011. These moves have helped to harden Russias resolve to protect its national sovereignty and great-power status. And indeed, it is not coincidental that liberalism appears to be in crisis in the West at the same moment as the international order to which it gave birth has encountered a major roadblock.

Liberalism is by its very definition a universalizing ideology, resolved to promote democracy and human rights across the world. Having failed to remake the Middle East in its image and subsume Russia into its orbit, the liberal-international sphere of states appears no longer able to expand its borders in any significant fashion. This has produced a crisis of confidence for the West, which, since the dawn of the Age of Exploration more than five centuries ago, has believed that the rest of the world would one day come to resemble it.

This dual crisis of liberalismdomestic and internationalbrings with it at least two important lessons for the West.

First, functional repairs to liberal economic and political projects (e.g., the Eurozone) are necessary but insufficient remedies for what plagues the West today. Tinkering around the edges is not enough. What liberalism needs to succeed over the long term is a wholesale reconceptualization, a move away from its present hyper-materialist, consumerist character and toward a greater focus on human dignity, mutual obligations, and the common good. Liberals celebrating recent populist setbacks in France, Austria, and the Netherlands should keep this need for reform in mind.

And second, liberal states may have to prepare for a world featuring multiple overlapping international orders, rather than a single-tier liberal system. Further attempts by the West to impose its values on non-Western major powers stand only to strengthen anti-Western voices within those countries. A more cautious, realist approach is the most reliable way to transition peacefully toward a world in which the West may eventually no longer be ideologically or materially dominant.

The proverbial cat may be out of the bag. Liberal aims may have already morphed into uncontrollable structural forces, taking on a life of their own. Under ideological siege, Western states may grow increasingly inflexible in their conduct of foreign policy. The shift toward a potentially post-liberal, post-Western world is thus likely to be fraught with difficulty. But without decisive action, the contemporary international order will continue to disintegrate and domestic political consensus will continue to erode.

Today, the ultimate triumph of liberalism no longer appears certain. What this realization bodes for the West remains to be seen.

Zachary Paikin (@zpaikin) is a PhD candidate and assistant lecturer at the University of Kent in Canterbury, United Kingdom, researching Russian conceptions of state sovereignty and their impact on the contemporary international order.

View original post here:

Welcome to the Post-liberal International Order - The American Conservative

A liberal advocacy group is running new television and digital advertising targeting Republican senators who could be potential swing votes on the Senates ObamaCare repeal bill.

The seven-figure buy from Save My Care will run TV and digital ads in four states: Alaska, Nevada, Maine and West Virginia.

Sens. Lisa MurkowskiLisa MurkowskiLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Schumer wants all-Senate meeting on healthcare Overnight Healthcare: GOP brushes off Trump calling health bill 'mean' | Big decision for insurers | Trump order on drug pricing in the works MORE (Alaska), Dean HellerDean HellerLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Governors from both parties slam House ObamaCare bill, call for bipartisan Senate approach Court-martial possible in Marines nude photo sharing scandal MORE (Nev.), Susan CollinsSusan CollinsLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Elizabeth Dole, Ryan Phillippe urge action on military caregivers Overnight Defense: Trump to let Pentagon set Afghan troop levels | Senate advances Russia sanctions deal | Mattis to talk missile defense with South Korea MORE (Maine) and Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Moore CapitoLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Murkowski: 'I just truly do not know' if I can support GOP health bill GOP considers keeping ObamaCare taxes MORE (W.Va.) are among the more moderate Republican senators who could prove crucial if any of them choose to oppose Senate leaderships emerging legislation.

Heller and Capito represent expansion states and recently said they support a proposal that would gradually end the extra federal funding expansion states receive over a seven-year period. Collins hasnt tipped her hand, and Murkowski has consistently said she supports expansion and wont vote for ending expansion if her state legislature wants to keep it.

She also said recently she wasnt sure she could support the emerging bill because she doesnt know what policies will be included.

Senate leaders can only afford to lose two votes when they bring the legislation to the floor. Its a delicate balancing act, and if enough moderates can be convinced to oppose the bill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Trump probe puts spotlight on Justice's No. 3 Schumer wants all-Senate meeting on healthcare MORE (R-Ky.) may need to rely on conservatives such as Rand PaulRand PaulLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Overnight Defense: Senate approves Russia, Iran sanctions | GOP chair expects to surpass Trump defense budget | Nude photo scandal could lead to court-martial Overnight Healthcare: GOP brushes off Trump calling health bill 'mean' | Big decision for insurers | Trump order on drug pricing in the works MORE (Ky.) or Mike LeeMike LeeLiberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes Murkowski: 'I just truly do not know' if I can support GOP health bill Rand Paul denounces 'new entitlements' in emerging health bill MORE (Utah) to help pass the measure.

Visit link:

Liberal group targets potential Republican healthcare swing votes - The Hill

A Liberal bill that would make it easier for people to become Canadian citizens has passed the Senate, after over a year of back-and-forth in Parliament.

Bill C-6 was designed to repeal many of the previous Conservative government's changes to how people become citizens and how they can lose that status.

Among other things, the legislation repeals a provision that strips dual citizens of their Canadian status if convicted of terrorism, treason or espionage.

But far more people lose their citizenship because it was obtained fraudulently and current law gives them no right to appeal, something not addressed in the Liberals' original bill.

The Senate proposed adding such an appeal and the Liberals agreed to that and several other amendments late last week.

The bill went back to the Senate and after a brief debate, passed by a vote of 51-29.

Former immigration minister John McCallum introduced the bill in 2016, following through on a Liberal campaign promise that had in part spawned Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's famous "A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian" line during the heated debates of the 2015 election.

The issue was the Conservatives' citizenship law, which allowed for stripping citizenship from dual nationals convicted of certain serious crimes.

It has been applied to one person: Zakaria Amara, convicted for his role in a 2006 terror plot in Toronto and his citizenship is now likely to be reinstated.

The Liberals' original bill makes two other changes: restoring the age range for language and knowledge requirements for citizenship to 18 to 54 from 14 to 64. One of the Senate amendments had sought to raise the upper age to 59 but the Liberals did not accept that.

The other change in the bill repeals a Conservative provision that required people to say they intended to reside in Canada as part of their citizenship application.

Among the notable Senate amendments was one allowing people a right to appeal if their citizenship were to be revoked because of fraud.

The Liberals accepted it, though their hand was forced a bit after a recent Federal Court ruling saying citizens deserved an independent hearing before their status was revoked.

The Opposition Conservatives have condemned that move, saying it risks encouraging people to lie on their application, because of the lengthy appeals process.

They say their process which left decisions on revocation in the hands of the bureaucrats was more efficient, and court appeals were still possible if the law was wrongly applied.

Visit link:

Liberal bill to reverse Conservative move to strip citizenships passes Senate - CBC.ca

Peta Credlin said she was completely unaware of the event: I havent been approached. Photograph: Sky News

A proposal to have Peta Credlin address a Liberal function in Victoria on the subject of party values was kiboshed on the basis that her contribution would be controversial and unhelpful.

A number of Liberal sources have told Guardian Australia a proposal was floated by members of the partys state assembly to have the Sky News commentator and Tony Abbotts former chief of staff address the group at one of its monthly meetings but it was overruled by an organising committee before an invitation was issued.

The group, which is predominantly an administrative body, is chaired by Paul Mitchell, a young lawyer aligned with the Victorian party president, Michael Kroger. It holds regular forums with guest speakers.

Credlin told Guardian Australia on Friday she was completely unaware of the event and the body organising it. I dont know anything about it, and I havent been approached.

The Victorian Liberals are beset by longstanding factional tensions, which played out in an apparent push against the revenue minister, Kelly ODwyer, in the seat of Higgins.

Reports surfaced in April that party donors disgruntled about government superannuation changes championed by ODwyer wanted to enlist Credlin to run against her in the Victorian seat.

At the time, ODwyer was one week into maternity leave after the birth of her second child.

After the story was published, Credlin said she was not interested in taking on ODwyer in Higgins, but she amplified the criticism of the superannuation changes, noting that very few of the frontbench could argue for them or even explain them.

Some party sources say Credlin is in hot demand because shes popular with the party base

In the immediate aftermath of the controversy, Kroger also failed to give unqualified endorsement to the idea that ODwyer would keep her seat.

Given the ongoing factional crosscurrents, which also played out publicly this year when Kroger was challenged for the party presidency by Peter Reith, who ultimately withdrew owing to serious illness internal sensitivities in Victoria run high.

Credlin is a regular at party events and fundraisers and some party sources say shes in hot demand because shes popular with the party base. Other party figures assert that Kroger is keen to promote Credlin.

Liberal sources have told Guardian Australia the proposal to have Credlin speak to an official party function in Victoria was vetoed by the organising committee because it was considered inappropriate, given that she was regularly critical of the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, and the government.

Go here to see the original:

Peta Credlin deemed too controversial to address Liberal function - The Guardian

The Liberal government is ready to move forward with several reforms to the rules of the House of Commons, with proposed changes covering prorogation and omnibus legislation. But it's still unclear whether they will have any opposition support.

The changes won't include new rules to codify a prime minister's question period, but the Liberals are committing to continue the recent practice of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau taking all questions each Wednesday.

The Liberals backed away from other proposals in April, after the government's release of a discussion paper on reform prompted opposition outrage.

When the Liberals refused to agree that they would only proceed with the consensus of all parties, Conservatives and New Democrats filibustered a Liberal MP's attempt to have the government's proposals studied by a House of Commons committee.

The motion to implement the changes will be put forward after several days of discussions between the Liberals, Conservatives and New Democrats, but at least the NDP is nonetheless poised to vote against it.

The Conservatives had been threatening to trigger more than 200 votes to tie up the House of Commons unless the Liberals compromised.

The new Liberal motion could be debated by MPs next week.

Under the changes proposed by the Liberals, a minister would be required to table an explanation after every use of prorogation to explain why the government prorogued Parliament. That explanation would then be referred to a House committee.

For omnibus legislation, the Speaker would also be empowered to allow for separate votes and studies for bills "where there is not a common element connecting the various provisions or where unrelated matters are linked." Budget bills that implement measures outlined in the federal budget would still be permitted.

In addition to prorogation and omnibus bills two issues that became points of controversy in recent years the Liberal motion would change the date on which the government's financial requests are tabled in Parliament and establish that parliamentary secretaries can be non-voting members of House committees.

The possibility of putting a weekly prime minister's question period in writing had raised concerns that a prime minister might use that as an excuse to only appear at one session of question period each week, though the Liberals said that was not Trudeau's intent.

"The prime minister's question period is here to stay under this government," said Mark Kennedy, director of communications for government House leader Bardish Chagger. "And just as it became the convention not something in the standing orders in the United Kingdom, we are confident it will become the convention here."

The New Democrats say they won't support the motion.

"This is a hasty retreat by the Liberals on what has been a complete failure," NDP House leader Murray Rankinsaid in a statement.

"It's clear now that they never needed to force through changes to how Parliament works. It's transparent that the priority of the Liberals was not to improve democracy but instead to help themselves."

Rankinargues that the Liberal changes will "reinforce" the use of omnibus bills and reduce the independence of House committees.

While saying it was "disappointing" that the government had not been more collaborative in pursuing reform, Conservative deputy House leader Chris Warkentin said Conservative MPs would "take a look" at the proposals and "make a determination if, in fact, we can live with what they've come up with."

Read the original post:

Liberals ready to make changes to House rules on omnibus bills, prorogation - CBC.ca

New York Times

In Congressman's Shooting, a Like-Minded Gunman Shakes a Liberal Enclave New York Times The colorful neighborhood of Del Ray is very quiet, very charming and very liberal. But the neighborhood was shaken by an outsider who was very destructive, very unwelcome and very liberal. The shooting Wednesday morning at the Eugene Simpson ... An online rush to blame 'liberal rhetoric' for Virginia mass shootingThinkProgress Blaming political vitriol for men like James Hodgkinson? Not so fast, experts sayUSA TODAY all 4,415 news articles »

Read more from the original source:

In Congressman's Shooting, a Like-Minded Gunman Shakes a Liberal Enclave - New York Times

NewsBusters (blog)

Alt-Left Insanity: Liberal Shooting Spree = Time to Take Away Our Guns NewsBusters (blog) You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. Those are the famous words of then-Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Coming just a day after an alt-left nutball tried to kill a baseball diamond full of Republicans, it's worth understanding how ... and more »

Continued here:

Alt-Left Insanity: Liberal Shooting Spree = Time to Take Away Our Guns - NewsBusters (blog)

Toronto Sun

Trudeau unplugs Liberal MPs' 5% 'Netflix tax' Toronto Sun The majority report calls on Ottawa to apply the tax, levied on broadband Internet providers, to high-speed Internet services that allow for the streaming of music, movies and TV shows. Liberal members of the committee tried to sell the move as one ... Liberal MPs to call for broadband Internet tax to fund Canadian mediaThe Globe and Mail all 2 news articles »

See more here:

Trudeau unplugs Liberal MPs' 5% 'Netflix tax' - Toronto Sun

It's Republicans' always fault, no matter what. When a Democrat is attacked, conservative rhetoric is to blame, even if it isn't. And when a field full of Republican Congressman are assaulted by a left-wing gunman, it's high time for a national conversation about...the Republican president, of course. I spent a great deal of time and energy yesterday trying to maintain my intellectual integrity and apply my standards evenly -- but hot damn, the Left makes it really tough to treat them fairly sometimes. As a repulsive orgy of political blame plays out in the aftermath of Wednesday morning's shooting spree, a mind-bending talking point is starting to congeal in some lefty quarters: Donald Trump's coarsening of our dialogue is an important factor in all of this. As you absorb these quotes, bear in mind that we're talking about an embittered, hardcore leftist shooting up a bunch of Republicans, one of whom remains in critical condition as he undergoes multiple operations. That's the lay of them land. But Trump! Let's start with Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown, who is up for re-election next year in a state that went red by nine points last fall:

One wonders what Rep. Steve Scalise thinks of that "false equivalency." Next, here's MSNBC's Mike Brzezinski graciously allowing that perhaps the blame shouldn't be placed "squarely" on Trump, but opining that he's certainly adding to the nation's "dangerous climate:"

Oh. I wonder what Clarence Thomas, or Robert Bork, or Barry Goldwater might have to say about this analysis. Or Alexander Hamilton for that matter. How cartoonishly obtuse. Last but not least (for now) is New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush -- who referred to himself as a pro-Clinton "hack" before getting hired by the supposed "paper of record" -- declaring where every conversation about civility must begin:

"Fact, not opinion" is a nice touch. But if Thrush's Democratic allies are to be believed, the Giffords shooting was about right-wing incivility; that incident happened -- and correct me if I'm wrong here -- years before DonaldTrump was even a candidate. Also, the man who was president at the time called his predecessor "unpatriotic," urged his supporters to 'bring a gun to a knife fight,' claimed that Republicans want to contaminate the air and water consumed by America's children, accused his opposition (without a shred of irony) of being hellbent on taking healthcare away from people, said that critics of his terrible Iranian nuclear deal were allying themselves with 'death to America'-chanting zealots, and whose White House compared the opposing party to "hostage takers," "arsonists"and even "terrorists." But by all means, any debate about civility in politics must begin with Trump. Fact, not opinion. Perhaps what Thrush et al don't realize is that Trump's (admittedly terrible) comportment and (gross and reckless) ends-justify-the-means methods were seen as features, not bugs, by millions of primary voters who were attracted to a nasty brawler who would punch back against what they've seen as the Left's relentless gutter tactics and moral bullying. You bully us with impunity, so we'll hire our own bully, and see how you like it.

Both "sides" have made innumerable contributions to our current dysfunctional and ugly national conversation, with more than enough examples to allow spiraling 'whataboutism' to go on endlessly. Post-tragedy Twitter is a depressingly reliable reminder of that reality. But to pretend that Trump is the root of all of this is absurd. He's a symptom of a long-metastasizing disease. (Opinion, not fact, because I'm self-aware). If you're fixating on Trump while a member of Trump's party is fighting for his life because a left-wing assailant's bullet pierced his internal organs, you're doing it wrong. Badly, badly wrong. If the Right is always going to be widely and loudly blamed for violence against liberals -- even if they're not remotely responsible -- and also partially blamed for left-wing violence against their own, is it any wonder that many conservatives turned to a figure like Trump? If the media stacks the deck in such an enragingly unfair way, the incentive to act in good faith dissipates. That's that's truly tragic for the country.

Suspicious Letters Arrive Near Georgia Republican Candidate's Home

See original here:

New Liberal Talking Point: Republicans and Trump Are Partially to Blame for This Anti-GOP Shooting - Townhall

|

Posted: Jun 15, 2017 12:01 AM

After Republican Rep. Steve Scalise was shot yesterday, many liberals on twitter CELEBRATED and said things like,

The Only Good Fascist is a Dead One.

Thats a Shame but babies blown to bits at Sandy Hook was worse and Scalise takes money from the @NRA

If the shooter has a serious health condition then is taking potshots at the GOP leadership considered self defense?

If KKK support Steve Scalise dies, the shooter deserves a holiday, true leadership. Now the trumps, kush, & miller need to be transitioned.

Is it any wonder? The most prominent liberals in America regularly accuse conservatives of being racist, sexist, Nazis, fascists who want children to die and are killing the planet and ruining the environment all because of their hate of the poor and minorities. Liberals today aim a nastier stream of propaganda at Republicans than America did at the Nazis; so is it any wonder that some people take the next logical step and become violent?

Meanwhile, you have plays, rap videos and prominent liberals glorifying the murder of the President, liberals applauding unrepentant terrorists like Bill Ayers, all while cops at left-wing universities stand back and allow violent students to riot, threaten and disrupt conservative speakers. Were moving fast towards a point where clashes between armed gangs of thugs on both sides will leave people dead because liberals believe conservatives arent human beings and thus, dont deserve the same protection under the law.

Im not going to blame Bernie Sanders for the shooter who supported him or say that liberals and Democrats should be held personally responsible for it. The only person responsible for what the shooter did was the shooter. However, this sort of political violence is doomed to grow ever more common and bloodier unless liberal Democrats start changing the sort of rhetoric they engage in on a regular basis. Rhetoric like this

1) "Michele (Bachmann), slit your wrist. Go ahead... or, do us all a better thing [sic]. Move that knife up about two feet. Start right at the collarbone." -- Montel Williams

2) F*ck that dude. Ill smack that f*ckers comb-over right off his f*cking scalp. Like, for real, if I met Donald Trump, Id punch him in his f*cking face. And thats not a joke. Even if he did become president watch out, Donald Trump, because I will punch you in your f*cking face if I ever meet you. Secret Service had better just f*cking be on it. Dont let me anywhere within a block. Rapper Everlast on Donald Trump

3) I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldnt be dying needlessly tomorrow.Im just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. Thats a fact. Bill Maher

4) I know how the tea party people feel, the anger, venom and bile that many of them showed during the recent House vote on health-care reform. I know because I want to spit on them, take one of their Obama Plan White Slavery signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads. The Washington Posts Courtland Milloy

5) F*** God D*mned Joe the God D*mned Motherf*cking plumber! I want Motherf*cking Joe the plumber dead. Liberal talk show host Charles Karel Bouley on the air.

6) Are you angry? [Yeah!] Are you angry? [Yeah!] Are you angry? [Yeah!] Well, weve been watching intifada in Palestine, weve been watching an uprising in Iraq, and the question is that what are we doing? How come we dont have an intifada in this country? Because it seem[s] to me, that we are comfortable in where we are, watching CNN, ABC, NBC, Fox, and all these mainstream giving us a window to the world while the world is being managed from Washington, from New York, from every other place in here in San Francisco: Chevron, Bechtel, [Carlyle?] Group, Halliburton; every one of those lying, cheating, stealing, deceiving individuals are in our country and were sitting here and watching the world pass by, people being bombed, and its about time that we have an intifada in this country that change[s] fundamentally the political dynamics in here. And we know every Theyre gonna say some Palestinian being too radical well, you havent seen radicalism yet. U.C. Berkeley Lecturer Hatem Bazian fires up the crowd at an anti-war rally by calling for an American intifada

7) "That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida. Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. He stole billions of dollars from the United States government and he's running for governor of Florida. He's a millionaire and a billionaire. He's no hero. He's a damn crook. It's just we don't prosecute big crooks." -- Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa

8) ..And then theres Rumsfeld who said of Iraq We have our good days and our bad days. We should put this S.O.B. up against a wall and say This is one of our bad days and pull the trigger. Do you want to salvage our country? Be a savior of our country? Then vote for John Kerry and get rid of the whole Bush Bunch. From a fund raising ad put out by the St. Petersburg Democratic Club

9) Republicans dont believe in the imagination, partly because so few of them have one, but mostly because it gets in the way of their chosen work, which is to destroy the human race and the planet. Human beings, who have imaginations, can see a recipe for disaster in the making; Republicans, whose goal in life is to profit from disaster and who dont give a hoot about human beings, either cant or wont. Which is why I personally think they should be exterminated before they cause any more harm. The Village Voices Michael Feingold, in a theater review of all places

10) But the victim is also inaccurately being eulogized as a kind and loving religious man. Make no mistake, as disgusting and deservedly dead as the hate-filled fanatical Muslim killers were, Thalasinos was also a hate-filled bigot. Death cant change that. But in the U.S., we dont die for speaking our minds. Or were not supposed to anyway. Thalasinos was an anti-government, anti-Islam, pro-NRA, rabidly anti-Planned Parenthood kinda guy, who posted that it would be Freaking Awesome if hateful Ann Coulter was named head of Homeland Security. Linda Stasi, New York Daily News,on a victim murdered in the San Bernadino terrorist attack

11) Cheney deserves same final end he gave Saddam. Hope there are cell cams. Rep. Chuck Kruger (D-Thomaston)

12) If I had my way, I would see Katherine Harris and Ken Blackwell strapped down to electric chairs and lit up like Christmas trees. The better to light the way for American Democracy and American Freedom! Democratic Talk Radios Stephen Crockett

13) May your children all die from debilitating, painful and incurable diseases. Allan Brauer, the communications chair of the Democratic Party of Sacramento County to Ted Cruz staffer Amanda Carpenter

14) Violence solves nothing. I want a rhino to f*ck @SpeakerRyan to death with its horn because it's FUNNY, not because he's a #GOPmurderbro. Jos Whedon

15) I hope Roger Ailes dies slow, painful, and soon. The evil that man has done to the American tapestry is unprecedented for an individual. Think Progress editorAlan Pyke

16) But, you know, the NRA members are the current incarnation of the brownshirts from Germany back in the early 30s, late 20s, early 30s. Now, of course, there came the Night of the Long Knives when the brownshirts were slaughtered and dumped in the nearest ditches when the power structure finally got tired of them. So I look forward to that day. Mike Malloy

17) "Or pick up a baseball bat and take out every f*cking republican and independent I see. #f*cktrump, #f*cktheGOP, #f*ckstraightwhiteamerica, #f*ckyourprivilege." -- Orange is the New Black star Lea DeLaria responding to a meme about using music to deal with violence

18) I wish they (Republicans) were all f*cking dead! Dan Savage

19) Sarah Palin needs to have her hair shaved off to a buzz cut, get headf*cked by a big veiny, ashy, black d*ck then be locked in a cupboard. Azealia Banks advocates raping Sarah Palin over a fake news story

20) Yes, Im angry. Yes, Im outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House, but I know that this wont change anything." -- Madonna

Originally posted here:

20 Liberal Calls For Violence Against Conservatives in Quotes - Townhall