Category Archives: Liberal

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Ignorance is dangerous.

Rioters defaced the statue of Matthias Baldwin outside of the city hall in Philadelphia. If only they had bothered to learn about his incredible life.

Baldwin was a successful owner of a company that made trains. He used part of his wealth to open a school in Philadelphia for black children during the 1800s. He personally paid for the salary of the teachers.

All throughout his life, Matthias Baldwin spoke out for the abolition of slavery in the United States. His beliefs were driven by his faith as a devoted Christian. His statements in opposition to slavery were used against him by his competitors in business when they tried to get business with railroads based in the South.

In 1837, Baldwin was a member of the Pennsylvania State Constitutional Convention. He voted against the exclusion of black property owners from the right of franchise. If only the vandals had known a thing or two about history. Instead of defacing his statue, they should be following his principled example.

Sadly, ignorance is not limited to rioters. Years ago, I was asked by a reporter what we were going to do about taking down Civil War monuments in Wisconsin. Which ones, I responded, Lincoln or Grant? Apparently it didnt dawn on this reporter that our ancestors fought on the side of the Union and helped win the Civil War.

My state is filled with statues honoring President Abraham Lincoln and General and later President Ulysses S. Grant. Both men were fellow Midwesterners.

Ignorance is dangerous.

In Boston, vandals damaged the Robert Gould Shaw and the 54th Regiment Memorial with phrases including No Justice, No Peace and Police are Pigs. Ironically, the memorial features the likenesses of one of the first African-American volunteer infantry units that fought after Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation.

In my state of Wisconsin, a group of people opposed to slavery came together in a school house on March 20, 1854. They suggested the name Republican for the new anti-slavery party. The first nominating convention was held later that summer in Michigan. Republicans opposed the expansion of slavery into the western territories.

Lincoln was the first nominee of the newly formed party. His Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves.

The 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which banned slavery in the United States was passed under Republican congressional leadership. With unanimous Republican support and against intense Democratic opposition, Congress passes the 14th Amendment, which gives former slaves citizenship and equal protection rights.

Ignorance is dangerous.

The media are a part of that ignorance. Several media outlets have referred to former Alabama Gov. George Wallace, who infamously stood in the schoolhouse door to try and block black students from entering schools with white students, as a Republican. He was a Democrat.

So was former Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd from West Virginia. He was also a former Ku Klux Klan Exalted Cyclops. And he was the president pro tempore in 2010, when Democrats controlled the Senate.

And remember when former Vice President Joe Biden reminisced last year about civility in the Senate? The members he mentioned were both segregationists from the South. At the time, an NBC anchor said they were Republicans but they were actually Democrats.

Ignorance is dangerous.

Speaking of Mr. Biden, he has some explaining to do. Recently released letters show Mr. Biden asking for the support of Sen. James Eastland, a Mississippi Democrat, for his bill that opposed busing to desegregate schools. Eastland was a leading symbol of Southern resistance to desegregation and he frequently spoke of blacks as an inferior race.

Mr. Biden, then a first-term senator, wrote to Eastland who was then the Judiciary Committee chairman, Dear Mr. Chairman, I want you to know that I very much appreciate your help during this weeks committee meeting in attempting to bring my anti-busing legislation to a vote. Mr. Biden also thanked Eastland for his efforts in support of my bill to limit court ordered busing.

During his first term, Mr. Biden also said about his opposition to court-ordered busing, Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle with tensions having built so high that it is going to explode at some point. We have got to make some move on this. A New York Times report said that Mr. Biden objected to the education department mandating desegregation absent a court order, and warned of white flight to the suburbs and even racial unrest.

Democrats were the party of slavery, Jim Crow, the Ku Klux Klan, and anti-desegregation. Republicans were the party of Lincoln, Reconstruction, anti-lynching laws, and the civil rights acts. And vandals should actually learn about many of the leaders for equality and freedom that we honor in our memorials across America.

Scott Walker was the 45th governor of Wisconsin. You can contact him at [emailprotected] or follow him @ScottWalker.

Continue reading here:

Liberal media and Democrats fan the flames of civil rights ignorance - Washington Times

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responds to a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill Tuesday May 26, 2020 in Ottawa. The government a minority government, remember has been able to operate with minimal oversight since March.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

While Canadians struggle with government-imposed restrictions on their movements, their businesses and their employment, and face fines or even jail time for failing to quarantine properly, the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau continues to do its best to shield itself from parliamentary accountability during the pandemic.

The government a minority government, remember has been able to operate with minimal oversight since March. Thats when all the parties agreed to temporarily adjourn Parliament, as part of the emergency lockdown measures brought about by the spread of the novel coronavirus.

Since April, thanks to a Liberal motion opposed by the Conservatives, but adopted with the support of the New Democratic Party and the Bloc Qubcois, the Trudeau government has only had to answer to an all-party special committee on the COVID-19 pandemic.

Story continues below advertisement

The 30-member committee meets through videoconference twice a week, and one day a week in the House of Commons, with time allotted for opposition members to question ministers but only on issues related to the pandemic.

What might look like Question Period when the committee holds its meetings in the House of Commons has in fact been a pale imitation of the real thing.

Mr. Trudeau has meanwhile been able to stand in front of a microphone every day, far from Parliament, and make announcement after announcement about new programs.

The special committee meetings have been accountability-lite some of the fizz, none of the calories and now even they are coming to an end.

Under a new Liberal Party motion on track to be adopted on Tuesday evening with the support of the NDP, the special pandemic committee will cease to exist as of June 18, and Parliament will remain suspended until Sept. 21.

There will be only three scheduled days this summer when opposition MPs will be allowed to ask questions of the government. As well, only a handful of committees will be allowed to hold meetings, and must do so remotely.

Most worrying of all, under the Liberals latest plan, a whole-of-government committee will have exactly four hours on June 17 to debate, and then approve without amendment," more than $150-billion in new spending on proposed COVID-19 relief programs.

Story continues below advertisement

Those spending estimates have not been released, so its impossible to say exactly whats included. But what it is safe to say is that your average family spends more time deciding on a new washing machine than Parliament is going to be given to consider tens of billions of dollars in new authorities.

This is not how Canadian democracy is supposed to work. We largely agree with the Liberal emergency measures but thats not the point. As keeper of the public purse, the House of Commons is in charge of approving, or not, government spending. While successive governments of all stripes have done their best to minimize this role, none has ever gone quite as far as cancelling the tabling of an annual budget, and then reducing debate on its near-budget to half a days work.

We live in a difficult time when the federal government is working in overdrive, and will likely need to do so through the summer, but the elected body that it reports to has been jammed into neutral. Thats not Canadian-style responsible government, especially when the government in question is a minority.

Parliament should be, and could be, sitting. You only have to look around the world to see that legislatures have found ways to continue their vital role during the crisis. That includes parliaments in Britain, Germany and France.

As businesses across Canada begin to be allowed to reopen, its becoming increasingly difficult to understand why Parliament cant. A recent report by the House of Commons Administration says it is ready to hold virtual sittings, or hybrid sittings in which some members are in the chamber and others are at home.

The Liberals and the NDP need to make an immediate U-turn and support the return of Parliament. The tools exist to practise both physical distancing and democracy. We dont have to choose.

Story continues below advertisement

And the need is urgent. Canadas limitations on large in-person gatherings could well continue into 2021. The Trudeau government might be happy to go a year with a silenced Parliament, but nobody else should be.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the days most important headlines. Sign up today.

Continued here:

Liberals to Parliament: Well govern without you, thanks - The Globe and Mail

Former CBS News President Van Gordon Sauter delivered a scathing critique of news outlets, saying two out of three leading cable news sources, in particular,"are unrelentingly liberal in their fear and loathing of President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump marks 'very sad milestone' of 100K coronavirus deaths DOJ: George Floyd death investigation a 'top priority' Lifting our voices and votes MORE."

Sauter, who served as CBS News president on two occasions in the 1980s, asked in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece published on Sundaywhether a large segment of the public will "ever put stock in journalism it considers hostile to the countrys best interests."

The highly influential daily newspapers in New York, Washington, Los Angeles and Boston are now decidedly liberal, Sauter wrote.

On the home screen, the three broadcast network divisions still have their liberal tilt. Two of the three leading cable news sources are unrelentingly liberal in their fear and loathing of President Trump," he added, appearing to refer to MSNBC and CNN.

The news media is catching up with the liberalism of the professoriate, the entertainment industry, upscale magazines and the literary world. Recent arrivals are the late-night TV hosts who have broken the boundaries of what was considered acceptable political humor for networks," he continued.

To the journalists, including more than a few Republicans, [the president] is a blatant vulgarian, an incessant prevaricator, and a dangerous leader who should be ousted next January, if not sooner," he later added.

Sauter, also a onetime president of CBS Sports, also asked what media coverage will look like if Trump wins a second term.

How will a large segment of the public ever put stock in journalism it considers hostile to the countrys best interests? he asked.

Sauter's perspective comes as the news media's credibility rating fell to a new low in a recent poll by Morning Consult, with those identifying as Republican primarily driving the number down.

"Among Republicans, perceptions of four media outlets have fallen more than 20 points since the last presidential election. In December 2016, at least roughly half of Republicans thought The Wall Street Journal (64 percent), The New York Times (52 percent), CNN (51 percent) and MSNBC (48 percent) were credible," reads the Morning Consult findings. "Four years later, those figures now stand at 41 percent for The Journal, 29 percent for the Times and 27 percent for both CNN and MSNBC."

The overall share of U.S. adults who said nine leading media outlets ranging from CBS News to The New York Times are credible dropped more than 9percentage points since December 2016, from 60.6 percent to 51.2 percent in May 2020, according to the poll's findings.

--This report was updated at 10:57 a.m.

Read the rest here:

Former CBS News president: Most major cable news outlets 'unrelentingly liberal' in 'fear and loathing' of Trump | TheHill - The Hill

On Monday around 8am, a white woman named Amy Cooper was walking her dog unleashed in a protected area of New York Citys Central Park, a wooded space called The Ramble.

Christian Cooper (no relation), a Black man and a bird-watcher, asked Amy to leash her dog. Dogs must be leashed in Central Park from 9am to 9pm, but in the Ramble they must be leashed at all times. Christian later said that he had been worried about the delicate ecosystem of The Ramble and the way in which the dog might affect the birds.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Amy, clearly offended, responded by saying that she was going to call the police on him. The video Christian took ended up online, and almost instantly went viral.

In response to the video, many on social media began to speculate and insist that Amy Cooper was a Trump supporter and a member of the MAGA movement.

However, campaign contribution information with donations to Democrats such as Barack Obama, Pete Buttigieg, and John Kerry leaked online earlier today appeared to suggest that Amy actually identifies as a liberal. If true, this matters, because in this political era, during this most critical US presidential election, it is necessary that we understand and recognize that white violence transcends party lines and political ideology.

In the video that Christian recorded, Amy can be heard saying, "I'm taking a picture and calling the cops, as she appears to strangle or roughly handle her dog with the pets collar. "I'm going to tell them there's an African American man threatening my life."

Amy repeatedly and insistently stresses the term African American, giving viewers the impression that his race is significant here, perhaps in terms of how he can expect to be treated by the police. Incidents of police brutality against Black people are not rare, as Amy Cooper must surely be aware of. In fact, just today, news broke that another unidentified Black man has died in Minneapolis, seemingly gasping, I cant breathe as a police officer keeps his knee on the mans neck.

White violence is not the sole domain of Trump supporters, or open white supremacists. White violence is pervasive, spreading everywhere and tainting everything. And when we overlook liberal white racism, we put ourselves in grave danger, because liberal white people often live closer in proximity to Black folks than their conservative peers. There's a chance the Amy Cooper we see in that viral video may not be the same Amy Cooper whose details were leaked onto social media but as a New York City resident, she's still statistically much likely to be a Democrat than a Republican, and the conversation about white liberal racism is long overdue.

Many believe that if we just get Donald Trump out of office and replace him with a white liberal or a white moderate, racialized violence will abate in this country. But thats not necessarily the case. Moderate and liberal politicians have all aided in such violence becoming the norm as well. Martin Luther King Jr. himself warned of the particular danger of this type of racism. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection, he wrote in his famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail.

And that lukewarm acceptance can quickly turn into threats or actual violence, when white people that their supremacy and their spaces are being threatened. Former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg may well be a Democrat and a self-identified liberal, for instance, but his handling of the killing of Eric Logan by police traumatized the Black community.

Assuming that Amy Cooper is a white conservative Trump supporter desensitizes us to the ways in which even progressive white people protect their spaces from Black people. We cannot assume that a liberal or even a progressive political future will save Black people from white fragility and white supremacy and white violence. A long legacy of considering themselves superior doesnt go away just because someone has a D for Democrat behind their name, or on their voter registration.

In a city and a state that skews heavily liberal, there's a good chance Amy Cooper is the ideal liberal on paper. She also threatened to call the police and falsely report an African American man was threatening her life in a country well-known for allowing fatal police brutality against unarmed, innocent Black people.

But Amy Cooper is not an anomaly. She is, unfortunately, the norm.

Visit link:

It looks like Amy Cooper, the white woman in the viral Central Park video, is a liberal. That's important - The Independent

FridayMay22,2020at7:30AM

The following is a letter to the editor.

After reading many Letters to the Editor and also many opinions by educated individuals with pile-it-higher-and-deeper degrees, etc., I have come to the conclusion many folks are on one side of the political fence or the other.

Never mind all the liberal news articles by the associated depressed and other news outlets The Daily Telegram and Monroe News carries, I just wish folks would apply critical thinking instead of criticizing differences. That being said, I have a short test so you can decide what side of the fence you are on. Here goes: If a conservative doesn't like guns he won't buy one; if a liberal does not like guns, he wants all guns outlawed. If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat; if a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone. If a conservative is down and out, he thinks how to better his or her situation; a liberal wonders who is going to take care of him. If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels; liberals demand those they don't like it to be shut down. If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church; a liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and Jesus silenced. If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it; a liberal demands the rest of us pay for his. If a conservative reads this, he will share it with his friends so they can have a good laugh; a liberal will delete it out of his mind, because he is offended by the truth.

Our first president was quoted, I would rather die on my feet, than to live on my knees. Do you think he would be a conservative or liberal today?

Mark Masters

Morenci

See original here:

Letter: The differences between a liberal and a conservative - The Daily Telegram

OTTAWA Facing a significant drop in donations during the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal Liberal, Conservatives and New Democratic parties have all applied for the Trudeau governments wage subsidy.

The information first began trickling out publicly on Friday afternoon when Karl Blanger, former NDP national director and now consultant and radio columnist for Gatineaus 104.7 FM, revealed that his former party had applied for the subsidy.

Im not sure I would have made the same decision, but at the same time, I understand why theyre making it. If they are indeed facing the situation where they would have to layoff employees, then their own workers shouldnt be excluded because of who they work for, Blanger later said in an interview with the National Post.

When later approached by media, the Liberal Party of Canada and the Conservative Party of Canada also confirmed that they had also applied for and received money from the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS).

Only the Bloc Qubcois said it had not applied for the federal program, nor did it plan on it in the future.

Launched on April 27, the CEWS covers 75 per cent of eligible employers payrolls up to a weekly maximum of $847 per employee for up to 12 weeks starting March 15.

To be eligible, an organizations revenue must have dropped by at least 30 per cent in one month since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Private businesses as well as most non-profits are eligible. Political parties are the latter.

All four federal parties said that the cancellation of in-person funding events and a drop in donations as millions of Canadians lost their jobs led to a significant fall in revenue over the past two months.

As an organization, we rely heavily on the donations of individuals, especially for our day-to-day operations which are 100% funded by our donors, Conservative spokesman Cory Hann explained. The party employs about 60 people both full and part time.

We understand that many Canadians are not able to give at the moment, which is why weve been taking a different approach on donation asks and operations that take that into account, he continued, adding that remote work has also led to unexpected expenses.

The health and safety of Canadians is always our top priority, and all in-person fundraising events were paused as of early March, Liberal Party spokesperson Braeden Caley wrote in a statement. The Liberal Party of Canada has met the eligibility criteria for the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy in recent weeks and received that support.

Support was definitely staying strong following the election and into this year. And then in March, when the pandemic was declared and everything kind of shut down, we saw a drop in our numbers in March, and then a more significant drop in April. We anticipate the same for May and for the next little while, NDP National Director Anne McGrath explained in an interview.

Her party was the only one that accepted to detail how much its revenue had dropped since the beginning of the pandemic.

According to McGrath, the party collected approximately $297,000 in March 2020, compared to $375,000 in the same month last year.

The decrease was even steeper in April, when the party registered $275,000 in donations, compared to $400,000 at the same time last year.

I wouldnt identify it as drastic, but it is significant enough, McGrath said. We want to maintain our staffing levels and not layoff people. Many of the people on our staff are single parents, students and people who are new Canadians.

If the NDPs application is approved by the Canada Revenue Agency (it should be), the money will serve to pay the partys roughly 35 full and part-time employees.

As is the case for all political parties, MPs and their political staffs salary are not eligible to be covered by CEWS, since they are not employed by their party. They are paid through an independent budget from the House of Commons.

The program is there to prevent layoffs, right? And everybody is experiencing a downturn in their in their revenues. And so I think it makes sense (for political parties to apply). From my point of view, its the responsible thing to do, McGrath added.

Follow this link:

Liberals, Conservatives, New Democrats all apply for COVID-19 wage subsidy to pay their workers - National Post

Like many sectors, higher education is in a panic about coronavirus survival rates. Small liberal arts colleges that are tuition dependent are at particularly high risk. To be sure, there is a lot to worry about: most obviously, endowment losses due to stock market declines and the prospect of lower enrollments if too many accepted students take a gap year. Family economic woes causing a decline in the number of returning students, perceived or real quality control issues with remote learning, and the threat of more disruption or a coronavirus cluster on the campus could also wreak havoc on an institutions bottom line.

Despite some bold and early announcements that face-to-face instruction will take place in the fall, we all know that such instruction might not be possible or wise. A good deal of institutional thinking currently revolves around reconfiguring the calendar to anticipate and diminish disruption. But institutions should be thinking more about how to authentically market what they offer, and they need to explicitly address legitimate concerns of parents and students. To do so, small liberal arts colleges need to innovate in order to deliver on what they already do best.

First and foremost, our colleges need to make good on the rhetoric that the safety of students and employees comes first. The jig is up if getting room and board fees in the coffers trumps the well-being of the campus community. Even if it seems that institutions can open safely, a hybrid model that allows remote-learning options for students who might be able to afford college if they can forgo room and board fees, or who might be high risk, sends a clear message that different needs will be honored.

Planning now for such a hybrid model also means that a college will be halfway there to a total remote-learning environment should that again become necessary. Such a model also accommodates high-risk faculty. Community-minded values are one of the appeals of a small college. Planning for the next academic year should build on -- rather than violate -- those values of care.

What are some specific steps that small colleges can take in the challenging months ahead?

Small liberal arts colleges focus on low faculty/student ratios and small classes that allow meaningful mentoring relationships with faculty members as well as peer education. What if a British-style tutorial were part of every first-year students experience? Among smaller groups, meetings powered by Zoom can foster intellectual community, while online discussion forums can require students to respond to one anothers writing. Many faculty members at liberal arts colleges have the pedagogical chops to do this work well. Colleges that can clearly communicate that such high-quality experiences can be expected in person or at a distance are more likely to be able to recruit an incoming class.

Intensive research seminars where faculty-guided independent work is supplemented with a cohort of peers who can help vet one anothers projects and learn to ask (and answer) critical questions about both the research process and its products should be provided for upper-class students. This seminar could be a prelude to capstones in the major or to other high-impact experiences such as internships. Such offerings would be in keeping with and an extension of research opportunities already on offer at many liberal arts colleges.

Some students might elect to study pandemic-related topics in an effort to process the experiences of this moment. Others might need to lose themselves in a passion that seems distant from the horrors of the present. Enabling students to make their education their own is a hallmark of the liberal arts experience, and additional intensive research and writing experiences can aid emotional and intellectual development during these unprecedented times.

Liberal arts colleges should also use this moment to integrate career coaching throughout the curriculum. First-year tutorials and research seminars are the perfect places to do some of that work. The next few graduating classes will be entering a brutal job market, and we owe our students careful instruction in the development and transferability of marketable skills.

One of my regular course offerings at the liberal arts college where I teach is Novel English Majors, which is focused on both literary and career narratives. Im already thinking about strategies for coping with a pandemic and post-pandemic economy and how students might be able to capitalize on recently being forced to up their technological game for remote learning. Making a case for the economic value of the liberal arts experience adds value to the education we offer rather than detracting from it. We owe it to students and parents to ameliorate rather than add to the economic hardship that is now irrefutably part of the zeitgeist.

Part of career coaching involves connecting current students with alumni. Current students benefit from hearing firsthand about the twists and turns that professional trajectories take. Millennials who had to find their way during the Great Recession of 2007-2009 will be particularly helpful to the next few graduating classes, since real talk about navigating a spiraling economy can prepare and empower students. But we also have a responsibility to those very same alums who are now navigating the second major economic crisis of their careers. Especially if our institutions have spaces in virtual classes, why not invite alums to sign up for some lifelong learning at steeply discounted prices?

Small-scale, caring communities. Intensive mentoring and research experiences. Relationships and connections that last a lifetime. Lifelong learning. These are the signatures of small colleges. If we hold fast to our core educational values while innovating for a new, potentially virtual normal for a time, well give ourselves and our institutions a chance to survive this pandemic.

Just as important, well hopefully prepare the next generation to not repeat the myriad mistakes that brought us to this cataclysm. Colleges committed to ensuring that we dont end up with a lost generation of traumatized students are likely to earn their future.

See the article here:

How small liberal arts colleges can best weather the pandemic (opinion) - Inside Higher Ed

Adrian Wyld/CPGreen Party MP Jenica Atwin (left) and NDP MP Lindsay Mathyssen look on as Conservative MP Karen Vecchio speaks during a news conference on May 28, 2020 in Ottawa.

OTTAWA An Ontario centre that helps women and girls who have been victims of human trafficking and sexual exploitation has to shut one of its key support programs next month due to a federal fund that has expired, even as the COVID-19 pandemic continues.

Megan Walker, executive director of the London Abused Womens Centre, says she is devastated at the prospect of closing this program and fears for the safety of those it serves.

To have to go and speak with these women and girls and let them know they may no longer be able to come here for service leads them back to only one person, and thats their trafficker, Walker said.

If we turn our backs on these women and girls now, they will be hopeless. They have already reported that if they cant be served, theyll be suicidal and they may be killed.

Watch: Multi-partisan push for human-trafficking victims

The London centre is one of 13 organizations across Canada whose federal funding ended on March 31 due to end of a five-year federal program set up by the former Conservative government alongside efforts to reform Canadas prostitution laws.

The Measures to Address Prostitution Initiatives (MAPI)program is being replaced by a new national strategy to combat human trafficking. But even though the Liberals announced $75 million in funding for this strategy in September 2019,none of this money has materialized.

This has left a gap in funding for some of the organizations that operated under the previous program, with no clear idea of when new money will be made available.

Community members rallied to raise funds to keep the London centre operating fully until the end of June, but Walker says she doesnt know what will happen after that.

Were in a pretty desperate situation at the moment.

On Thursday, members of Parliament from every opposition party joined together to call on the Liberal government to reverse its decision to allow the former funding to expire.

Conservative MP Karen Vecchio, Bloc Quebecois MP Andreanne Larouche, Lindsay Mathyssen from the NDP and Green MP Jenica Atwin sent a joint letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other ministers responsible for this file, calling on them to restore funding to these groups and enable them to continue their work.

The letter was also signed by every opposition member of the Commons status of women committee and the MPs with organizations in their ridings affected by the funding change.

These programs are vital, these programs save lives, these programs give people a second chance and these programs are working to end human trafficking and sexual exploitation, Vecchio said.

Mathyssen said the situation highlights concerns that womens organizations have repeatedly raised about the vulnerability that exists when groups are reliant on project-based funding.

Organizations are left to scramble and scrape together the funding to deliver programs that they know are essential,Mathyssen said.

The federal government needs to get back to providing core, stable, reliable funding to womens organizations so they can deliver these needed services, especially when theres an emergency or something unexpected that comes up that they need to deal with. They can move funding to best fit what is needed by their community.

Mary-Liz Power, spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Bill Blair, says money will flow from the new national strategy soon, although no timelines were offered.

Backed by $75 million in additional investments, the national strategy to combat human trafficking will increase Canadas ability to fight this abhorrent attack on basic human rights and dignity, Power said in a statement. She pointed to other funding commitments the Liberal government has made to help womens organizations and reduce gender-based violence.

Walker expressed frustration at ongoing promises from government officials who say theyre working on finding a solution.

If your government truly has a feminist agenda that prioritizes the most vulnerable women and girls in society, what are you working at? Why dont they just say, Yes this was an error and heres the money? Its very, very confusing for us.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 28, 2020.

See more here:

Opposition MPs Demand Liberals Revive Fund For Human Trafficking Victims - HuffPost Canada

These qualities all compel us to look, think, and act beyond our self-interestto be ever mindful of the greater good. As faculty and students explore new ideas and fresh approaches to long-standing problems, they are thinking about the larger impact and societal implications of what they are learning and building. In a civic culture now grievously challenged to impress on us all the life-and-death consequences of our own actions in the public sphere, it is no exaggeration to designate these skills as nonnegotiable tools of survival.

The liberal arts also enable us to navigate other core challenges arising from our embattled civic ordersuch as climate change, inequality, mass incarceration, and immigrationwhile exploring broader, more inclusive conceptions of the common good. Exploring means questioning received truths, being open to new understanding and ways of knowing, to learning that the old things arent always the way you thought they were. This is the core method behind educational inquiry of all kinds.

When thinking this way, we are not simply reflecting on an issue or a problem in isolation; we are thinking through it. We are thinking with empathy and seeing in new ways the cultures, beliefs, and even realities that we once described as other.

This is how students begin to understand and appreciate the differences and the commonalities that exist across cultures, races, ethnicities, gender, and histories. They begin to recognize that, even though there are borders, we must embrace the borderless. This ultimately involves knowing and understanding science and mathematics, the humanities, the arts, and the social sciences by doing them. It is the what of educationthe content of any civic curriculum worthy of the name.

Link:

The Case for Liberal Arts Education in a Time of Crisis - The New Republic

I am four generations removed from slavery and have been black all my life, but according to comments made Friday by former Vice President Joe Biden Im not black because I support President Trump.

Since when did a 77-year-old white liberal gain the right to strip me of my cultural identity, biological features, and history of chattel slavery and tell me I aint black because I stand for conservative values as a first-generation Republican?

The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee told the host of The Breakfast Club radio program Friday: If you have a problem figuring out whether youre for me or Trump, then you aint black.

JOE BIDEN EXPRESSES REGRET OVER 'YOU AIN'T BLACK' COMMENTS: I SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SO CAVALIER'

Admittedly, Biden gave a half-hearted walk-back of his comments later in the day that was almost as dismissive and insulting as his initial comments.

Biden told a black business group that he shouldnt have been such a wise guy.

He acted as if what he said was correct in substance, but just poorly worded. In fact, Biden used broken English, in a stereotypically black voice, to make the point that Democrats in general and he in particular own the black vote.

Trying to make amends for his earlier comments, Biden said later in the day: "No one should have to vote for any party based on their race or religion or background."

But Bidens real views were clear from his first comments: the Democratic Party takes the black vote for granted and is willing to defend his racist comments because the partys only focus is on winning elections at any cost.

Since when did a 77-year-old white liberal gain the right to strip me of my cultural identity, biological features, and history of chattel slavery and tell me I aint black because I stand for conservative values as a first-generation Republican?

Biden clearly does not believe that an intelligent, reasonable, melanin-blessed individual could possibly prefer President Trump in the November election. This is despite the fact that Trump presided over the lowest black unemployment rates in U.S. history until the coronavirus pandemic hit and signed the most far-reaching criminal justice reform bill in history.

Bidens claim to our vote? He happened to work for a black president.

This is ridiculous. Let me compare my choices side by side.

Lets start with President Trump. I worked on Capitol Hill when the presidents tax reforms were approved. These reforms and cuts in taxes along with Trumps regulatory relief arguably created an economy that employed more black Americans, Asians and Latinos than ever in this nations history.

I also was a key drafter of the Opportunity Zones policy that has the potential to attract billions of dollars into the distressed communities where black Americans disproportionately reside.

Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C. my former boss was instrumental in crafting the First Step Act. The criminal justice reform bill, which disproportionately benefitted black Americans, would never have become law without President Trumps direct involvement.

Now lets take a look at Joe Biden. Well, he worked for President Obama. Admittedly thats not nothing. Many black folks recognize the impact of a white man being willing to take orders from a black man for eight years.

Since there is a reasonable argument that a black person can make not to vote for Biden, why does Biden feel comfortable saying what he said and saying it in a stereotypical, minstrel tone?

However, since he left the office of vice president, Bidens problems with African-Americans have followed him.

Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., accused Biden of racism for working with segregationist Democrats as a senator to block busing to integrate schools.

During the debates among Democratic presidential candidates, another black candidate at the time Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey piled on and accused Biden of racism.

Even potential Biden running mate Stacey Abrams of Georgia, who is also black, has played the race card, strongly implying that Biden would be a racist should he fail to pick a vice presidential running who is not black, not female, and well not her.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER

Since there is a reasonable argument that a black person can make not to vote for Biden, why does Biden feel comfortable saying what he said and saying it in a stereotypical, minstrel tone?

I think it's the same reason Hillary Clinton expected black people to believe she carries hot sauce in her purse (thereby implying that all black women do and she is relatable).

Biden mistakenly believes blacks will continue to support Democrats no matter what, and that we can be depended on to guilt any reluctant blacks into falling in line.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

He is wrong on both counts and he will find out the hard way in November.

Heres my message to Joe Biden: You associate being black with simple minds and broken English. But I am black, I know my own mind, and President Trump has my vote in November not you.

Link:

Shay Hawkins: Biden, a 77-year-old white liberal, doesn't have the right to tell me I 'ain't black' - Fox News