Category Archives: Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is a free and open-source video-conferencing application that allows you to host your own video conferencing server without any subscription. It provides multi-person video conference rooms and allows you to access them from your web browser. It provides end-to-end TLS encryption so that no one can snoop on the call. Deploying Jitsi meet in the Docker container will save you a lot of time.

In this post, we will show you how to Deploy Jitsi Meet with Docker and Docker Compose on Ubuntu 20.04.

First, log in to your Atlantic.Net Cloud Server. Create a new server, choosing Ubuntu 20.04 as the operating system with at least 4GB RAM. Connect to your Cloud Server via SSH and log in using the credentials highlighted at the top of the page.

Once you are logged in to your Ubuntu 20.04 server, run the following command to update your base system with the latest available packages.

First, you will need to install some required dependencies on your server. You can install them with the following command:

After installing all of them, add the Docker repository with the following command:

Once the repository is added, install Docker and Docker Compose with the following command:

After installing both packages, you can proceed to the next step.

Next, you will need to download Jitsi Meet for Docker from the Git repository. You can download it with the following command:

Once the download is completed, change the directory to the downloaded directory and copy the sample environment file.

Next, edit the .env file and define your server IP, ports, domain, and email address.

Change the following lines:

Save and close the file when you are finished.

You can now launch the Jitsi Meet container with the following command:

You should see the following output:

You can now check the running container with the following command:

You should get the following output:

As you can see, the Jitsi Meet container is started and listen on ports 80 and 443.

Now, you can access the Jitsi Meet web interface using the URL https://your-domain-name. You should see the Jitsi Meed dashboard on the following page:

Congratulations! You have successfully deployed Jitsi Meet with Docker on Ubuntu 20.04. Docker makes your job easier when it comes to deploying an application within a minute get started on dedicated hosting from Atlantic.Net.

See the original post:
How to Deploy Jitsi Meet with Docker on Ubuntu 20.04

With so many meetings migrating from the physical to the digital, its no wonder that a huge number of video conferencing platforms have emerged. In this Jitsi Meet review, we take a look at one of the best video conferencing software in 2021 (opens in new tab).

Jitsi Meet (opens in new tab) takes simplicity and ease of use to new levels and enables you to conduct a video call for multiple participants without an account and for free. Read on to learn whether Jitsi Meet has the functionality you require to host your next video conferencing event.

Jitsi Meet is a subsidiary of VoIP company 8x8, and the companys paid-for video conferencing service, 8x8 Meet, a more feature-heavy version of Jitsi Meet, is advertised on the Jitsi Meet website. Jitsi Meet itself is free forever and doesnt include any tiered price plans.

You can also install Jitsi as a service on an existing website or app to create an integrated video calling function. 8x8 Jitsi as a Service (JaaS) is a separate product developed by the Jitsi organization and is free to use, but active users are capped at 25.

Beyond this, JaaS Basic allows 300 users and costs $99 dollars a month, Jaas Standard costs $499 a month and facilitates up to 1,500 users, while for $999, Jaas Business allows 3,000 active users.

Jitsi is an open-source platform that includes a number of audio and video communication projects. Jitsi Meet is the platforms flagship product and is free to use as a web, iOS, Android, or F Droid app. It includes HD audio and video, unlimited meetings for up to 50 guests, end-to-end encryption, screen sharing, remote desktop controls, and third-party integrations with Google, Slack, and Microsoft products.

Unusually for free video conferencing software, which regularly cap the length of meetings, Jitsti enables you to stay online for as long as is necessary. Meetings are in HD video and audio, and you can invite up to 50 participants.

Its easy to share meeting invites too. All you need to do is create a custom URL and distribute it to your guests.

Jitsi Meet integrates with Google, Microsoft, and Slack. You can use this integration to connect your calendar, add a browser extension, live stream video content on YouTube (via a Google account), and more.

For a free-to-use service, we were very impressed by the number of in-call options available. As well as screen sharing, remote desktop control, and a chat facility, there are the options to mute speakers, blur your background, record calls, and manage call quality.

As a moderator, you can also decide on other call parameters. For example, you can select an option that ensures everyone who joins the call is automatically muted.

Creating a meeting using Jitsi Meet is incredibly quick and simple. You dont have to create an account or provide any personal details. You just need to navigate to the website and enter a name for your meeting.

Next, a new meeting screen opens and you can join. There is a large Invite more people button at the top of the page. When you select this option, you can choose to share the meeting URL, or invite people in via a dial-in number.

Fundamental features such as screen sharing, leave call, mute, and chat functions are located prominently at the base of the screen. Further in-call functions are accessed via the three vertical dots to the right of the meeting screen. They are well referenced and easy to distinguish.

We were impressed by the call and video quality. We were also surprised to see the high level of design and functionality that had gone into a free service.

There is no dedicated commercial or personal support for Jitsi Meet. Instead, any queries should be directed to the community. As an open-source project, its not surprising that the Jitsi community page is very active.

Its not difficult to find help if you need it by searching for topics. You can also navigate via the Categories tab. Although not a dedicated support page, it is a helpful resource, and the Jitsi community is very passionate and active.

Security is a key concern for the Jitsi Meet platform. The product includes a rage of advanced security measures that can be toggled during calls. These include the option to create meeting passwords; lobby mode, which only enables users to enter a meeting if approved by a moderator; and end-to-end encryption.

At present, Jitsi Meets end-to-end encryption feature is in what it refers to as experimental mode. One of the consequences of this is that server-side functions, such as recording and live streaming, are disabled when the encryption feature is enabled.

Zoom is probably the most popular video conferencing software available with paid-for and free options, but for the purposes of this review, well just compare its free plan. In many ways, Jitsi Meet blows it out of the water. As well as a sleeker design, the platform enables unlimited call times, while Zooms group calls are capped at 40 minutes on the free plan.

Microsoft Teams free plan does enable up to 100 participants, double the allowance on Jitsi Meet, but again calls are capped on time: with Microsoft Teams there is a 60-minute limit. On top of this, both Zoom and Microsoft teams require you to create an account.

We were thoroughly impressed by the breadth of features, ease of use, and enhanced security Jitsi Meet provided. Some users may be put off by the fact that support can only be accessed through the community, but this is a common feature of open source projects.

Jitsi Meet deserves to be well-known beyond the developer community. The unlimited call limit alone is enough for us to rate this as one of the best, if not the best, free meeting platforms available.

The rest is here:
Jitsi Meet review | TechRadar

Digitalization encourages people and teams worldwide to have a secure and stable video conferencing software at hand. Zoom is a big player with hundreds of millions users. But is it really the best solution and could open-source alternatives like Jitsi be worthy competitors? Find answers in this article.

While theyre both video conferencing solutions, difference between the two is huge in some aspects.

Zoom provides cutting-edge communication technologies for various industries, including retail, education, government, and healthcare. Theres a free plan with limitations which well cover in this article. However, most plans require payment to unlock the best perks and yes, these options arent really budget-friendly.

Jitsi is an open-source and entirely free counterpart. Trusted by 20 million users worldwide, this software markets similar features to those you have in any paid video conferencing app. Meanwhile, its super flexible in fact, you can make calls without an account.

Already sure about your choice? Well, picking the suitable solution is not as easy as it seems. Read on to learn benefits of Zoom and Jitsi for personal and corporate use, plus some extra factors you should consider.

Both video conferencing services have evolved during the last years. Each of them offers several products.

Zoom users can choose between 4 products for getting in touch via video and audio calls:

Additional functionalities are VoIP phone service and conversation intelligence for getting valuable insights, understand sales deals better, and predict revenue.

Because each solution comprises different functionality sets, pricing vary depending on your demand.

Jitsi is responsible for developing 2 major projects:

Jitsi software is WebRTC compatible and completely open-source the code is available on GitHub.

The cost of video conferencing software is a vital aspect for most teams, since every business wants spare on digital solutions and invest money in growth.

Zoom offers a free plan with the following features:

The basic plan is enough for personal communication, whereas companies would consider paid plans with powerful features. Prices start at $149 per user/month and may include:

This list only contains the most important features. Visit this page to discover all Zoom One capabilities or prices of other Zoom products.

Jitsi Meet is totally free for meetings, no matter how long you talk to teammates. The sound and image quality is also up to standards. Also, you can embed conferences on websites and restream to sharing services, such as YouTube.

Note: Jitsi is a trademark of 88 that still provides some paid functionality within their own app, which is not open-source. That could be a great option for those who need a cheaper Zoom alternative, though. See prices for 88

Yes. Although we dont know exactly the brand of your laptop or cell phone, both video conferencing solutions are available for Windows, Linux, Mac, and mobile operating systems iOS and Android.

In fact, you can even start a meeting in your browser.

It sometimes happens that youre not satisfied with the native functionality of a video conferencing solution and want to enhance it with third-party plugins.

Zoom is a friendly solution for connecting various apps for broadcasting, analytics, CRM, collaboration, and more. Some popular examples are HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Asana etc. Visit App Marketplace to discover all Zoom integrations.

Jitsi also can be integrated with some well-known solutions like Slack, HumHub, Softgarden etc.

Security and privacy is vital for successful video conferencing. Nobody wants unauthorized people to have access to private discussions with sensitive information.

Jitsi is security-focused and offers ephemeral meeting rooms, which means they only exist during the meeting. Other privacy options include password protection, lobby, end-to-end encryption. Jitsi Meet for on-premise deployment does not have any preconfigured analytics engines. Even in the online version, they dont retain any personal information, such as names or emails.

Zoom is considered relatively safe thanks to end-to-end encryption. However, trusted sources report that Zoom uses the AES-128 algorithm instead of AES-256, which makes its security more vulnerable to some extent. Additionally, you wont be able to check the source code of this software to make sure it doesnt contain viruses and backdoors.

In practice, both solutions proved to be well-protected. If you follow basic information security guidelines on your workplace, hacking and outside attacks arent likely to happen.

Both Zoom and Jitsi can be connected with ONLYOFFICE Docs as plugins.

Such add-ons allow meeting up with teammates to briefly discuss the document, collaborate, and share your thoughts concerning texts, spreadsheets, or presentations without leaving office software.

ZOOM PLUGIN JITSI PLUGIN

Discover how to install plugins in self-hosted ONLYOFFICE Docs in this video:

The right choice depends on what you expect from a video conferencing solution. Will you need one for personal communication or business meetings? How large is your team? How much can you spend on digital solutions for corporate use?

We recommend to brainstorm use cases for your ideal virtual meetings software or even write them down. That way, youll be able to check whether theyre possible in Zoom or Jitsi.

Lets face it: Jitsi is not enough for large enterprises. Free and open-source, it only has basic tools and capabilities. Still, its a perfect fit for personal group conversations, non-profits, education, free webinars. If youre not a big company, Jitsi will cover most of your demands for video conferencing application.

Zoom is awesome and user-friendly, almost 100% suitable for corporate use in any business, especially large enterprises. Hundreds of attendees, unlimited whiteboards and session duration, numerous third-party plugins. The biggest deal-breaker is cost, which can be too high for some companies. Meanwhile, there are many paid Zoom alternatives with more attractive price tags.

Read more:
Zoom vs Jitsi for video conferencing? | ONLYOFFICE Blog

Embedding the Jitsi Meet API into your site or app enables you to host and provide secure video meetings with your colleagues, teams, and stakeholders. The Meet API provides a full complement of comprehensive meeting features.

Your Jitsi meetings can be hosted and attended using any device while keeping your data and privacy protected. You can reach your meeting participants anywhere in the world eliminating the need for travel and the associated inconvenience.

The IFrame API enables you to embed Jitsi Meet functionality into your meeting application so you can experience the full functionality of the globally distributed and highly available deployment available with meet.jit.si.

You can also embed and integrate the globally distributed and highly available deployment on the meet.jit.si platform itself.

JaaS customers, please make sure you also read this!

If you use React in your web application you might want to use our React SDK instead.

To enable the Jitsi Meet API in your application you must use one of the following JavaScript (JS) Jitsi Meet API library scripts and integrate it into your application:

For self-hosting in your domain:

meet.jit.si:

The iframe API works on mobile browsers the same way as it does on desktop browsers.

In order to open meetings with the Jitsi Meet app you can use our custom URL scheme as follows:

(let's assume the meeting is https://meet.jit.si/test123)

This works with custom servers too, just replace meet.jit.si with your custom server URL.

After you have integrated the Meet API library, you must then create the Jitsi Meet API object.

The Meet API object takes the following form:

api = new JitsiMeetExternalAPI(domain, options)

The API object constructor uses the following options:

domain: The domain used to build the conference URL (e.g., meet.jit.si).

options: The object with properties.

Optional arguments include:

roomName: The name of the room to join.

width: The created IFrame width.

The width argument has the following characteristics:

A numerical value indicates the width in pixel units.

If a string is specified the format is a number followed by px, em, pt, or %.

height: The height for the created IFrame.

The height argument has the following characteristics:

A numerical value indicates the height in pixel units.

If a string is specified the format is a number followed by px, em, pt, or %.

parentNode: The HTML DOM Element where the IFrame is added as a child.

configOverwrite: The JS object with overrides for options defined in the config.js file.

interfaceConfigOverwrite: The JS object with overrides for options defined in the interface_config.js file.

jwt: The JWT token.

onload: The IFrame onload event handler.

invitees: Object arrays that contain information about participants invited to a call.

devices: Information map about the devices used in a call.

userInfo: The JS object that contains information about the participant starting the meeting (e.g., email).

lang: The default meeting language.

For example:

You can set the initial media devices for the call using the following:

You can override options set in the config.js file and the interface_config.js file using the configOverwrite and interfaceConfigOverwrite objects, respectively.

For example:

To pass a JWT token to Jitsi Meet use the following:

You can set the userInfo (e.g., email, display name) for the call using the following:

Configuring the tile view:

You can configure the maximum number of columns in the tile view by overriding the TILE_VIEW_MAX_COLUMNS property from the interface_config.js file via the interfaceConfigOverwrite object:

TILE_VIEW_MAX_COLUMNS accepts values from 1 to 5. The default value is 5.

All functions are documented here now.

All commands are documented here now.

All events are documented here now.

Read this article:
IFrame API | Jitsi Meet - GitHub Pages

Follow these steps for a quick Jitsi-Meet installation on a Debian-based GNU/Linux system.The following distributions are supported out-of-the-box:

Many of the installation steps require root or sudo access. So it's recommended to have sudo/root access to your system.

You will need the following packages:

Make sure your system is up-to-date and required packages are installed:

Run as root or with sudo:

On Ubuntu systems, Jitsi requires dependencies from Ubuntu's universe package repository. To ensure this is enabled, run this command:

Retrieve the latest package versions across all repositories:

Decide what domain your server will use. For example, meet.example.org.

Set a DNS A record for that domain, using:

If your computer/server or router has a dynamic IP address (the IP address changes constantly), you can use a dynamic dns-service instead. Example DuckDNS.

DNS Record Example:

If the machine used to host the Jitsi Meet instance has a FQDN (for example meet.example.org) already set up in DNS, you can set it with the following command:

Then add the same FQDN in the /etc/hosts file:

x.x.x.x is your server's public IP address.

Finally on the same machine test that you can ping the FQDN with:

ping "$(hostname)"

If all worked as expected, you should see:meet.example.org

This will add the Prosody repository so that an up to date Prosody is installed, which is necessary for features including the lobby feature.

This will add the jitsi repository to your package sources to make the Jitsi Meet packages available.

Update all package sources:

The following ports need to be open in your firewall, to allow traffic to the Jitsi Meet server:

If you are using ufw, you can use the following commands:

Check the firewall status with:

For more details on using and hardening SSH access, see the corresponding Debian or Ubuntu documentation.

If you are running Jitsi Meet on a server behind NAT, forward the ports on your router to your server's IP address.

Note: if participants cannot see or hear each other, double check your firewall / NAT rules.

In order to have encrypted communications, you need a TLS certificate.

During installation of Jitsi Meet you can choose between different options:

The recommended option is to choose Generate a new self-signed certificate and create a Lets-Encrypt Certificate later (see below) (this will replace the self-signed certificate).

But if you want to use a different certificate or you want to choose a different challenge type of Let's Encrypt (see below for details), you should create that certificate first and then install jitsi-meet and choose I want to use my own certificate.

You could also use the self-signed certificate but this is not recommended for the following reasons:

Using a self-signed certificate will result in warnings being shown in your users browsers, because they cannot verify your server's identity.

Jitsi Meet mobile apps require a valid certificate signed by a trusted Certificate Authority and will not be able to connect to your server if you choose a self-signed certificate.

Note: The installer will check if Nginx or Apache are present (in that order) and configure a virtual host within the web server it finds to serve Jitsi Meet.

If you are already running Nginx on port 443 on the same machine, turnserver configuration will be skipped as it will conflict with your current port 443.

SSL/TLS certificate generation:You will be asked about SSL/TLS certificate generation.See above for details.

Hostname:You will also be asked to enter the hostname of the Jitsi Meet instance. If you have a domain, use the specific domain name, for example:meet.example.org.Alternatively you can enter the IP address of the machine (if it is static or doesn't change).

This hostname will be used for virtualhost configuration inside Jitsi Meet and also, you and your correspondents will be using it to access the web conferences.

Jitsi Meet server:Note: By default, anyone who has access to your Jitsi Meet server will be able to start a conference: if your server is open to the world, anyone can have a chat with anyone else.If you want to limit the ability to start a conference to registered users, follow the instructions to set up a secure domain.

Conferences/Rooms:The access control for conferences/rooms is managed in the rooms, you can set a password on the webpage of the specific room after creation.See the User Guide for details: https://jitsi.github.io/handbook/docs/user-guide/user-guide-start-a-jitsi-meeting

In order to have encrypted communications, you need a TLS certificate.

The best method is to create a certificate that is signed by a Certificate Authority.This way you can avoid problems with a self-signed certificate (see above for details).The easiest way is to use Let's Encrypt.

Simply run the following in your shell:

Note that this script uses the HTTP-01 challenge type and thus your instance needs to be accessible from the public internet on both ports 80 and 443. If you want to use a different challenge type, don't use this script and instead choose I want to use my own certificate during jitsi-meet installation.

If the installation is on a machine behind NAT jitsi-videobridge should configure itself automatically on boot. If three way calls do not work, further configuration of jitsi-videobridge is needed in order for it to be accessible from outside.

Provided that all required ports are routed (forwarded) to the machine that it runs on. By default these ports are (TCP/443 or TCP/4443 and UDP/10000).

The following extra lines need to be added to the file /etc/jitsi/videobridge/sip-communicator.properties:

And comment the existing org.ice4j.ice.harvest.STUN_MAPPING_HARVESTER_ADDRESSES.

See the documentation of ice4jfor details.

Systemd/Limits:Default deployments on systems using systemd will have low default values for maximum processes and open files. If the used bridge will expect higher number of participants the default values need to be adjusted (the default values are good for less than 100 participants).

To update the values edit /etc/systemd/system.conf and make sure you have the following values if values are smaller, if not do not update.

To check values just run:

To load the values and check them see below for details.

To reload the systemd changes on a running system execute sudo systemctl daemon-reload and sudo systemctl restart jitsi-videobridge2.To check the tasks part execute sudo systemctl status jitsi-videobridge2 and you should see Tasks: XX (limit: 65000).To check the files and process part execute cat /proc/`cat /var/run/jitsi-videobridge/jitsi-videobridge.pid`/limits and you should see:

Launch a web browser (such as Firefox, Chrome or Safari) and enter the hostname or IP address from the previous step into the address bar.

If you used a self-signed certificate (as opposed to using Let's Encrypt), your web browser will ask you to confirm that you trust the certificate. If you are testing from the iOS or Android app, it will probably fail at this point, if you are using a self-signed certificate.

You should see a web page prompting you to create a new meeting.Make sure that you can successfully create a meeting and that other participants are able to join the session.

If this all worked, then congratulations! You have an operational Jitsi conference service.

Sometimes the following packages will fail to uninstall properly:

When this happens, just run the uninstall command a second time and it should be ok.

The reason for the failure is that sometimes the uninstall script is faster than the process that stops the daemons. The second run of the uninstall command fixes this, as by then the jigasi or jitsi-videobridge daemons are already stopped.

Web Browser:You can try to use a different web browser. Some versions of some browsers are known to have issues with Jitsi Meet.

WebRTC, Webcam and Microphone:You can also visit https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/getusermedia/gum to test your browser's WebRTC support.

Firewall:If participants cannot see or hear each other, double check your firewall / NAT rules.

Nginx/Apache:As we prefer the usage of Nginx as webserver, the installer checks first for the presence of Nginx and then for Apache. In case you desperately need to enforce the usage of apache, try pre-setting the variable jitsi-meet/enforce_apache for package jitsi-meet-web-config on debconf.

Log files:Take a look at the various log files:

Jigasi is a server-side application acting as a gateway to Jitsi Meet conferences. It allows regular SIP clients to join meetings and provides transcription capabilities.

During the installation, you will be asked to enter your SIP account and password. This account will be used to invite the other SIP participants.

Launch again a browser with the Jitsi Meet URL and you'll see a telephone icon on the right end of the toolbar. Use it to invite SIP accounts to join the current conference.

Enjoy!

See the original post:
Self-Hosting Guide - Debian/Ubuntu server | Jitsi Meet

As soon as social distancing started, video calling became one of the best ways to stay in touch with loved ones.

New names, such as Zoom and Jitsi, have grown in popularity, and older services like Skype and Google Hangouts are still available, whether you use Gmail or Outlook for your emails.

To find out which are the best, weve run 11 different video calling apps through our lab tests to help you decide which one to use for your video catch-ups whether thats for work or play.

Whatever your budget, our lab tests reveal which models are worth your money and which aren't. See our expert pick of thebest laptops for 2022.

We cover a wide range of criteria in our video calling lab tests to make sure you can be confident about the app youre using:

In the table below we reveal the apps that are best for using at home. These all have free versions, and you dont need a business account to use them.

It might be an oldie, but its a goodie. Skype has been around long enough for years of development, and its topped our tests. Its a great free platform for home use, with consistently good audio and video quality. You can sign in with an existing Outlook email account, or set one up. Plus, theres now a web feature, so you can set up a call without even downloading anything.

Theres a wide array of useful and fun features such as a virtual background, so you can pretend youre at the beach (or wherever takes your fancy), and speech recognition subtitles for poor audio or people with impaired hearing. Skype is free with support for up to 50 people, although you'll have to buy Skype credits if you want to call a regular landline or mobile phone number.

You might not have heard of Jitsi, but its software that's often used by schools. It did really well when it comes to a patchy network, so if you struggle with your internet, its a good choice. Its free and you dont need to sign up which is really good for data protection.

We did find it a bit tricky to use, though, but this shouldnt put you off. You create a meeting by choosing a name for it. You can then share the name around to whoever you want to join. Its a bit like creating a WhatsApp group. Jitsi is free with support for up to 75 people.

Another good option is Discord, which is mostly used for gaming, but its chat and video calling features are good enough for any virtual meet-up. You can create a chat group with the same people, handy if you have a book club or gardening group.

Video is good if your internet drops out for a bit, but, as with even the best software, quality will be noticeably worse with slow connections. Discord is free with support for up to 25 people to join a video call.

If youre a Gmail user, Hangouts is another option. Even though theres no download (it works on the website or as a browser plugin), its not the easiest to use. It also struggles to keep video clear with a poor connection, but its fine with good internet.

Its worth noting that Google has since released Google Meet (a slightly different service, below). This will eventually replace Hangouts completely. Google Hangouts supports up to 25 participants on a video call.

Google's free version of Meet offers acceptable quality, but video isn't as good as others. That said, it copes better than some with a patchy connection and adjusting the settings is simple. It works in-browser and on the Android and iOS mobile apps. If you want to sign up with an email account which isn't Gmail, you'll have do to so on the web interface.

Its a bit lacking when it comes to features. The free version allows 100 participants, but you can't make use of extra functions such as meeting recording unless you pay for a Google Workspace Business Standard, Plus or Enterprise account. These start at 8.28 per user, per month.

Despite the media buzz around Zoom, plus backing from politicians and celebrities alike, Zoom isnt a service wed recommend and it came bottom of the barrel compared with other apps suited to home use.

Even with a good connection, Zooms video quality isnt quite as good as others, but its the speech and video quality with a poor connection which brings it down. As soon as the internet connection drops a little, speech can be practically inaudible and video is glitchy.

On the plus side, although it's been under fire for security issues, Zoom has resolved many problems in the version five update and we didnt find anything alarming. Zoom is free with support for up to 100 people.

In the table below we reveal the apps that are best for using at work. Some of these work with a business account and have features for team collaboration. Scroll down for more information about each one, including analysis of our results.

Onlylogged-inWhich? members can view the results in the table below. If youre not yet a member, you can get instant access by joining Which? today.

Log-into unlock our table, above, and our full analysis of our results.

Although we didn't run mobile-based video-calling apps through our full test, we've still run the rule over some of the more popular options to help you choose.

WhatsApp allows you to call up to eight people. You can call just one of your contacts, or straight from one of your WhatsApp groups. WhatsApp uses your internet connection, so it will be free if youre connected to wi-fi.

WhatsApp is also available on iPhones.

Facebook Messenger supports both voice and video calls. You can start a call straight from any existing conversation and it will link between all of your devices. It also allows group calls with up to eight people (who each have a Facebook account). Facebooks photo filters work with video calling, too if you want to have a bit of fun.

Facebook has also recently created Messenger Rooms, a feature which works on the Facebook and Messenger apps, and it allows up to 50 people on the call including those who dont have either service.

Facebook Messenger is also available on iPhones.

Google Duos app allows video calling with up to 32 people.

There are plenty of fun features, including doodle mode, which allows you to draw to everyone in the group, and fun augmented reality (AR) effects (if you fancy becoming a dinosaur for the evening). You can also take a photo of your call and share it immediately with everyone on the line great for documenting a virtual birthday party.

Google Duo is also available on iPhones.

Apple devices are supplied with FaceTime. You can video call anyone quickly and easily from your contacts or from the FaceTime app. Bear in mind that it only works if the person youre calling also has an Apple device, but you can add up to 32 people.

Houseparty kicked up a storm since the start of the coronavirus outbreak, when it skyrocketed in popularity. The company refuted hacking claims and its broadly safe to use. Read more about Houseparty security.

Its a bit different from the other options, as you can play games with up to eight people on your call, from virtual charades to Pictionary.

HouseParty is also available on Android.

Instagram has recently launched more features for group video calling. You can call just one person, or up to six people at once. To get notified about the call, though, youll have to make sure notifications are on for video chats.

You can use all of Instagrams filters in the group chat, as well as share photos youve liked recently with the group, so you can all view and chat about them together.

Instagram is also available on Android.

Although Zoom has been heavily criticised for security issues, it has improved with the update to Version 5. We ran each video calling app on test here through our security tests and we didnt find any cause for concern, including with Zoom.

There are some things that video calling services could do better, though. Some meetings cant be locked, or they have meeting names that could be guessed. Others allow trivial passwords, and their password policies could be more secure.

These can always be improved with updates, but you can do some things yourself in the meantime to make your meetings as secure as possible.

Some software, such as Slack and Discord, isn't too hot on making sure your passwords are secure. As an example, in our tests, Discord allowed 123456 to be used as a password, which is obviously a poor choice and easily guessable.

Instead, using three random words in sequence to create whats called a passphrase, instead of a traditional password, is best.

This could be something that youll remember easily, but doesnt necessarily need to make sense. Using something personal like your daughters name and birthday isnt ideal; like SarahBornJune. Something like DeskBoilerHippo would be fine.

With some software, such as Cisco and Jitsi, youll have a meeting name. If youre creating your own name, try to make it as unique and difficult to guess as possible so you dont have any unwanted guests, accidental or otherwise. Don't make it the same as your password, either.

If youre given the option, you can apply extra settings, such as multi-factor authentication. These are apps which generate a one-time code that you use to confirm that its really you logging in a bit like the codes you use with internet banking. You can find out how to do this in our guide to multi-factor authentication.

Some video calling options also allow you to lock your meetings, so no-one else can join. Once everyone is on the call, it's always a good idea to lock your meeting.

The rest is here:
Best Video Calling Apps: Zoom, Skype, Hangouts, Jitsi And More On Test - Which? - Which?

With video calls, it is no longer necessary to turn on the camera around the clock. Summarize the recommendations.

video calls Across Zoom, MS Teams, Jitsi, Webex, and many other platforms, in many places during the pandemic. In the home office Almost every office employee has one call or the other. Team meetings, meetings with clients, creative meetings, weekly or daily meetings such as press interviews, press conferences, etc.

But it doesnt have to be camera really ready for every call. There are times when its totally fine not to show your face. According to The Next Web, it has somewhat evolved etiquette Developed where you can join video conferencing not better Displays.

When its best to keep the camera closed:

On the other hand, it may be important in certain situations that all team members pay equal attention to video calls.

Gone are the days when you had to turn your camera on 24/7 for video calls.

More here:
When is it a good idea to turn off the camera during a video call - Aviation Analysis Wing

(Nairobi) Judicial authorities in Rwanda are prosecuting opposition members, journalists, and commentators on the basis of their speech and opinions, Human Rights Watch said today. Throughout 2020 and 2021, Human Rights Watch monitored trials in which judicial authorities pursued politically motivated prosecutions and perpetuated a culture of intolerance of dissent.

Less than two years out from the 2024 presidential election campaign season, the Rwandan government should ensure an end to violations against civil society activists, journalists, and opposition figures. The government should also protect their right to freedom of expression a precondition to creating a conducive environment for free and fair elections.

Judicial authorities in Rwanda, lacking the independence to stand up and protect free speech in accordance with international law, have unjustly convicted and jailed people based on their protected speech and opinions, said Lewis Mudge, Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch. All those jailed unjustly should be immediately and unconditionally released, and the abusive legal framework that allowed their prosecution should be reviewed and brought in line with international free speech standards.

Since the publication of a March 2021 report on the arrests of, and threats against, several Rwandans for posts on YouTube, Human Rights Watch has monitored trials and reviewed trial documents and verdicts to examine the evidence and arguments of prosecutorial authorities, and the basis for judges rulings.

Researchers also reviewed content published on various channels managed by journalists and commentators on trial and interviewed 11 opposition members and people who post on YouTube. The cases documented are not exhaustive Human Rights Watch also received information about other similar cases.

On March 3, 2022, Human Rights Watch wrote a letter to Justice Minister Emmanuel Ugirashebuja to share information about the cases it has documented and to request information on the Rwandan authorities steps to address violations of the right to freedom of expression. The government has not responded.

Rwanda has very few opposition parties, and human rights organizations and independent media remain weak. Victoire Ingabire, who was the president of the unregistered opposition party FDU-Inkingi before founding Dalfa-Umurinzi in November 2019, was released from prison in 2018. Members of her party have repeatedly been harassed, threatened, and arrested, or have died or disappeared in suspicious circumstances. Since October 2021, at least eight members of her party have been arrested and charged with offenses, including spreading rumors and forming a criminal association, in relation to a book they acquired and an online training session they attended to learn strategies for peaceful dissent.

Journalists using YouTube as a platform have also been targeted for prosecution for not registering with the Rwanda Media Commission (RMC) or for publishing information that contradicts the governments version of certain events, such as the suspicious death in custody of Kizito Mihigo, a gospel singer and activist, or disappearances of government opponents.

The cases of Dieudonn Niyonsenga alias Cyuma Hassan and Thoneste Nsengimana, which Human Rights Watch documented, could further erode journalists legal protections and narrow the space for media and online speech. Niyonsenga, a high-profile YouTuber, was found guilty on appeal of forgery, impersonation, hindering public works, and humiliation of national authorities and persons in charge of public service. The last charge, which was added during the first appeal, is no longer a criminal offense in Rwanda. The prosecution authority announced it was lodging a second appeal to correct the error. Its verdict is expected on March 18. On March 9, Human Rights Watch received reports and confirmed that Ishema TV was no longer available on YouTube. At time of writing, it is unclear whether the channel was removed voluntarily.

Since 1994, speaking about crimes committed by the ruling Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) in the aftermath of the genocide, or sometimes even simply commemorating Hutu who were killed during the genocide, is perceived as crossing a red line, with the government presenting it as a threat to Rwandan unity, or the countrys security as a whole.

When you are pro-government, you dont have any problems. When you talk about bad things, you become persecuted, you are a genocide denier, one YouTuber told Human Rights Watch.

Another said, They take one word, and they create a crime for you. Here, the problem is talking the truth. If you do, they go after you.

The Rwandan government may have legitimate grounds to seek to restrict the kind of dangerous, vitriolic speech that led to the deaths of over half a million people in 1994, but current laws and practices go far beyond this purpose creating fear and effectively stifling opinions, debate, and criticism of the government.

As Rwanda approaches the 30-year mark since the genocide, and the government aims to ramp up efforts to combat genocide ideology, there is a need to ensure that Rwandans can peacefully express legitimate grievances related to the genocide and post-genocide periods, Human Rights Watch said.

Article 38 of the 2015 Constitution protects freedom of expression but limits that protection by permitting ill-defined restrictions based on public order, good morals, the protection of the youth and children, the right of every citizen to honor and dignity and protection of personal and family privacy. The government, with the support of the judiciary, has used this clawback clause to impose restrictions on freedom of expression in ways that are incompatible with Rwandas regional and international obligations.

As Rwanda prepares to host the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, scheduled to take place in June, the international community should take a stand and press the authorities to stop harassing, immediately release, and drop all charges against opposition members, YouTube commentators and journalists facing abusive prosecutions that violate freedom of expression. The authorities should also open credible, independent, and transparent investigations into suspicious deaths and disappearances of critics, opposition members, civil society actors, and journalists, and prosecute those responsible.

The evidence provided by the prosecuting authorities, and what judges have chosen to rely on to justify their conclusions, clearly demonstrates that these cases violate African and international human rights law, Mudge said. Prosecuting those who challenge the government of incitement to insurrection or of attempting to tarnish the countrys image is an indication of how little dissent is tolerated in Rwanda.

For details of the recent cases, please see below.

Cases Against the Political Opposition

In October 2021, at least eight members of Victoire Ingabires opposition party, Dalfa-Umurinzi, were arrested in the largest crackdown against the party in recent years. Sylvain Sibomana, Alexis Rucubanganya, Hamad Hagenimana, Jean-Claude Ndayishimiye, Alphonse Mutabazi, Marcel Nahimana, and Emmanuel Masengesho were all detained in the days leading up to and following Ingabire day, scheduled for October 14.

On that day, Ingabire was planning to speak about political repression in Rwanda, cases of suspicious deaths, killings, disappearances, and abusive prosecutions. Thoneste Nsengimana, a journalist who was planning to cover the event, was arrested on October 13 and is being tried with the group of seven.

Criminal charges of spreading false information or harmful propaganda with intent to cause a hostile international opinion against Rwandan government and formation of or joining a criminal association were brought against Sibomana, Rucubanganya, Hagenimana, Ndayishimiye, Mutabazi, Nahimana, and Masengesho. On November 9, during a pretrial hearing, the Kicukiro court said it is also considering evidence to support other, undetermined charges against them. The prosecution contended that the defendants were also responsible for inciting insurrection.

Claudine Uwimana, a party member who was arrested on December 14 in Rutsiro, is being tried separately. She is charged with spreading false information, publishing rumors, forming a criminal association, and inciting insurrection, and has been denied bail.

The arrests send a clear message to those who may wish to mobilize, organize, or campaign on a political platform in the lead-up to the elections that efforts to peacefully change the power structures in place can be considered a criminal offense, Human Rights Watch said.

In both cases, the prosecution based its accusations on the groups decision to acquire Blueprint for Revolution, a book written by Srdja Popovic, and to follow a training organized by the authors organization, Canvas the Center for Applied Non-Violent Actions and Strategies. Both the book and the training focus on peaceful strategies to resist authoritarianism, such as nonviolent protest, noncooperation, boycott, and mobilization. The prosecution used as evidence the contents of the book and training, the use of Jitsi an encrypted online communication platform and the use of pseudonyms during the training.

The prosecution also accused the group of planning activities such as mobilizing, among others, street vendors and others who are routinely rounded up and subjected to abuse, and a commemoration of political activists and critics who have died, disappeared, or been jailed, on Ingabire Day, based on the strategies proposed during the training.

Social protest and mobilization offer people the opportunity to peacefully communicate legitimate complaints and grievances. Governments have a responsibility to create a safe and enabling environment for individuals and groups to exercise their rights to freedom of peaceful assembly, of expression, and of association.

Journalists Under Threat

Dieudonn Niyonsenga

Dieudonn Niyonsenga, also known as Cyuma Hassan, runs Ishema TV, a popular YouTube channel on which he has published his sensitive and critical reports. Ishema TV has millions of views, and Niyonsenga is one of the most popular YouTube contributors in Rwanda.

In April 2020, police arrested Niyonsenga and his driver, Fidle Komezusenge, as they were reporting on the impact of the Covid-19 guidelines on vulnerable populations in a poor neighborhood of Kigali. Niyonsenga and Komezusenge were accused of forgery, impersonating journalists, and hindering public works for being outside during lockdown without a valid RMC-issued press card. Both spent almost a year in detention, but then were acquitted on March 12, 2021. After his release, Niyonsenga gave several interviews on YouTube describing his treatment in detention. In one, he said:

At first, I think they accused me of seven offenses. It was a lot. They were forcing me to talk but I refused as long as I didnt have a lawyer. They took me to several police stations, I only spent one night in each cell. Finally, my lawyer spoke with them. [In Nyarugenge prison,] I was imprisoned in a one-meter-by-one-meter cell, filled with water and mosquitos. I was not allowed out to exercise.

After his acquittal and release, Niyonsenga continued to do critical and sensitive reporting, including investigating alleged abuses by the military. The prosecution successfully appealed the verdict and on November 11, 2021, Niyonsenga was arrested again at his home while Komezusenge was acquitted.

The appeals court found Niyonsenga guilty of forgery, impersonation, hindering public works, and humiliation of national authorities and persons in charge of public service. The last charge, which was added during the appeal, is no longer a criminal offense in Rwanda. It was struck down from the 2018 Penal Code by the Supreme Court in 2019. The prosecution authority of Rwanda tweeted on November 16 that Prosecution has lodged a 2nd appeal in the case against Niyonsenga Dieudonn alias Cyuma Hassan. The grounds for appeal is to correct an error convicting Cyuma for the crime of humiliating public service officials, a crime that was repealed in 2019.

That Niyonsenga was convicted of a crime that no longer exists in the Penal Code the humiliation of national authorities violates his right to a fair trial by a competent and impartial court. International law requires an effective remedy for anyone whose fair trial rights are violated.

During the first appeals hearings, the prosecution argued that Niyonsenga had practiced journalism and presented an Ishema TV card stating he was a journalist without being registered with the so-called self-regulatory RMC. The court found that although Rwandas media law allows any individual to obtain and impart information online, the fact that Niyonsenga presented himself as a journalist, without accreditation from the RMC, was misleading the public and a crime.

The prosecution argued that even though Niyonsenga, who studied journalism and worked for other registered media before establishing Ishema TV, applied to RMC for accreditation on April 4, 2021, and paid the 20,000 Rwandan Francs fee (US$20), journalism was comparable to medical and legal practice in that it required necessary authorization and qualifications to practice. It contended that the fact that Niyonsenga practiced journalism before having registered was grounds to convict him.

Requirements for journalists to register are rarely, if ever justifiable, and in a context of repression like Rwanda, they are used politically to curtail speech, Human Rights Watch said. Under international law, everyone has a right to obtain information and express oneself online. In its General Comment 34 on the right to freedom of expression, the UN reaffirmed that licensing requirements or other efforts to penalize media solely for being critical of the government or the political social system espoused by the government can never be considered to be a necessary restriction of freedom of expression.

The African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights 2019 Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa obligates governments to guarantee the right to establish various forms of independent media, including online media, and states that Any registration system for media shall be for administrative purposes only, and shall not impose excessive fees or other restrictions on the media.

Thoneste Nsengimana

Thoneste Nsengimana, who runs Umubavu TV, was first arrested in April 2020 and held in pretrial detention on accusations of fraud. On April 12, 2020,the Rwandan Investigation Bureau (RIB) tweeted confirmation of Nsengimanas arrest for alleged fraud. RIB accused him of promising 20,000 Rwandan Francs ($20) to people to say they were receiving assistance from abroad for the purpose of soliciting the story for his own benefit.

A Kicukiro court ordered Nsengimanas release from pretrial detention in May 2020 due to the prosecutions lack of evidence against him, and the charges were eventually dropped. Since his release, Nsengimanas YouTube channel has hosted sensitive and critical discussions on current affairs, including with a YouTube commentator, Aimable Karasira, who is now also in prison.

Nsengimana was arrested again on October 13, 2021, as part of a broader crackdown against Ingabires opposition party Dalfa-Umurinzi after his channel announced its intention to cover the Ingabire Day event.

The prosecution contends that Nsengimana used his YouTube channel to broadcast false information, including a video by activist Mireille Kagabo. The video was shared in the lead-up to Ingabire day, in which she called on people to commemorate heroes and political prisoners. She listed names and cases, including the suspicious death of Kizito Mihigo, the activist and gospel singer, in February 2020, the suspicious disappearance of Cassien Ntamuhanga, a journalist who was forcibly disappeared after being detained in Mozambique in May 2021, and the enforced disappearance and flawed trial of Paul Rusesabagina, a prominent government critic who was convicted of terrorism-related charges. Nsengimana has been charged with spreading false information or harmful propaganda with intent to cause a hostile international opinion against the Rwandan government.

The case is most likely designed to send a message not to question the governments version of events in cases of suspicious deaths, enforced disappearances, and prosecutions of critics and dissidents, Human Rights Watch said.

Dangers of Sensitive Commentary

Government officials have threatened, intimidated, and brought abusive prosecutions against several commentators using YouTube as a platform to self-publish commentary or artistic content. Innocent Bahati, a popular poet who published his work focusing on social and human rights issues on YouTube, remains missing over a year after he disappeared in suspicious circumstances on February 7, 2021. Recently, and after public pressure on the government to disclose his whereabouts increased, the RIB spokesperson told the media that Bahati had crossed into Uganda and that he had been working with anti-Rwanda elements, without providing any supporting evidence.

Aimable Karasira

Aimable Karasira, a Tutsi and former information communication technology professor at the University of Rwanda, has spoken about losing family members both to Hutu extremists and to the RPF in 1994 on hisYouTube channel called Ukuri Mbona(the truth I see in Kinyarwanda).

In July 2020,Edouard Bamporiki, culture and youth minister, attacked Karasira on social media and said he should not be allowed to teach. Karasira was dismissed from the University of Rwanda on August 14, 2020, for the expression of attitudes and opinions through controversial statements and spreading information intended for inciting people to dislike or dishonor your institution and public institutions in general. Karasira latersaid in a YouTube videothat he was summoned to the RIB office on December 8, 2020, where he was told to stop talking about the genocide.

On May 31, 2021, the RIB announced the arrest of Karasira for offenses under Rwandas genocide ideology law. His trial is ongoing.

During Karasiras July 27, 2021, pretrial hearing, the prosecution cited one of his interviews to support the charges of genocide denial and justification, and divisionism. The prosecution cited excerpts from an interview with Agns Nkusi Uwimana, a journalist who runs a YouTube channel, on May 23, 2021.

The prosecution contended that Karasiras statement that the downing of then-president Juvnal Habyarimanas plane in April 1994 became the trigger point for the genocide, constitutes genocide denial. His comments regarding the arrest of former prominent businessman under Habyarimana and one of the alleged masterminds of the Rwandan genocide, Flicien Kabuga, claiming that he was in court because he did not give money to the RPF like other businessmen, [and] saying that its because of the machetes he provided [during the genocide] is not true because every household had a machete were presented as minimizing the genocide.

In addition, the prosecution is arguing that his claim that the RPF had attacked Rwanda prior to the genocide is justification for the genocide and that saying Rwanda was not liberated (by the RPF) we [the survivors] became their sacrifice to justify their rule constitutes divisionism.

On May 30, the day before his arrest, Karasira published another video on his YouTube channel in which he gave details of his familys history, contending that his mother may have been killed in 1994 by the RPF because she witnessed their crimes. After the genocide, he said, he was prevented from receiving the benefits afforded to genocide survivors because of his familys history.

Rwandan laws on genocide ideology, which may have been intended to prevent and punish hate speech of the kind that led to the 1994 genocide, have restricted free speech and imposed strict limits on how people can talk about the genocide and other events of 1994.This case illustrates the extent to which these broad laws can be manipulated to silence those who wish to talk about the RPFs crimes in the aftermath of the genocide or challenge the official narrative around the genocide even survivors themselves.

Yvonne Idamange

Yvonne Idamange, a Tutsi online commentator who has criticized the Covid-19 lockdown and the government-organized genocide commemorations, was arrested on February 15, 2021, after posting a video in which she falselyclaimedthat President Kagame was dead, and called for the army to serve the people or face the wrath of God, and for Rwandans to march with their Bibles toward the office of the president.

In her first YouTube video, Idamange criticized the monetization of genocide memorials for tourism, in which the bodies of our relatives are being sold and questioned notions of collective guilt and the governments approach to commemorations.

On September 30, 2021, the High Court Chamber for International Crimes, where Idamanges trial took place behind closed doors, convicted her of inciting insurrection, minimizing the genocide, desecrating a memorial site, spreading rumors, rebellion against authorities, and issuing a check that bounced. She was sentenced to 15 years in prison and fined 2 million Rwandan Francs ($1,930).

The court convicted Idamange on the basis of statements she made in videos she published on YouTube before her arrest. The court found that her statements that Covid-19 has become a pretext, worsened for political gains that state institutions are ghosts and dont do their work. That the Rwandan state is a state of crooks, bandits, and thieves that Rwanda is a country without a shepherd and that Rwandans are in mourning and should march to Urugwiro to ask for the body of Paul Kagame constitutes inciting insurrection and unrest.

In addition, the court found that Idamanges statements that the Rwandan state threatens genocide survivors by killing people, exposing dead bodies, that its a government that no longer exists that the country has no president the country is governed by a dead body constitutes publication of rumors. Her criticism of the monetization of memorial sites and accusations that genocide survivors are ignored were found to be desecration of a memorial site and genocide minimization.

Many Rwandans have told Human Rights Watch they felt Idamanges statements went too far, including her false claims that President Paul Kagame was dead and her call for Rwandans to march towards the presidency. However, Idamanges treatment during her arrest, the severity of the criminal charges brought against her, the opaque nature of her trial, and the disproportionately harsh sentence handed out appear designed to intimidate anyone thinking of expressing critical, sensitive, or controversial views on the genocide.

Rwandan authorities efforts to combat genuine genocide denial should not involve criminal penalties for mere speech and should not attempt or aim to stifle legitimate and necessary discussion and debate on historical events, Human Rights Watch said. The criminal law, or any laws that create vaguely defined offenses, should not be used to prevent people challenging official versions of events.

Continue reading here:
Rwanda: Wave of Free Speech Prosecutions - Human Rights Watch

Almost all meeting solutions charge on a per-minute per-participant basis. If you have 10 people in an hour long video session, you'll be charged for 600 minutes. Those charges add up very quickly, and it's nearly impossible to forecast what your costs will be.

We decided to switch it up. We're charging on a Monthly Active User (MAU) model. This brings predictability into your costs and reduces your monthly bill dramatically. Pricing starts at $0.35/MAU and decreases based on volume. And if you just want to kick the tires and learn more about Jitsi as a Service we offer a developer package option that lets you have up to 25 Monthly Active Users for free.

An MAU is defined as a unique user who attended at least one meeting, with at least one other user, in the same month. To determine a unique user, we store an identifier on the device's local storage, and that will remain the same as long as the user uses the same browser and same device and doesn't clear their local cache data. Mobile is similar. An identifier remains across updates and gets removed if you delete the app.

The rest is here:
8x8 Video Conferencing API | 8x8

The Latest research coverage on Video-as-a-Service Market provides a detailed overview and accurate market size. The study is designed considering current and historical trends, market development and business strategies taken up by leaders and new industry players entering the market. Furthermore, study includes an in-depth analysis of global and regional markets along with country level market size breakdown to identifly potential gaps and opportunities to better investigate market status, development activity, value and growth patterns.

Access Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/sample-report/24623-global-video-as-a-service-market

TheVideo-as-a-Service MarketStudy byAMA Researchgives an essential tool and source to Industry stakeholders to figure out the market and other fundamental technicalities, covering growth, opportunities, competitive scenarios, and key trends in the Video-as-a-Service market.

Video-as-a-Service (VaaS) is nothing but the delivery of point-to-point video streaming capabilities over the internet. It comes under software as a service. In Video-as-a-Service, a video stream is delivered over the network by a provider. The service provider maintains communication between the parties which are involved. Video-as-a-Service has become an essential work environment. More businesses are attempting to follow the pattern of creating a flexible workspace. Businesses that use online work facilities are more able to hire and retain employees. By the means of Video-as-a-Service, employers can provide better work/life balance.

On 19th April 2021, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. a market leader in the Video-as-a-Service market, announced the Zoom Apps Fund, a new $100 million venture fund created to stimulate the growth of Zooms ecosystem of Zoom Apps, integrations, developer platform, and hardware. Initial investments will range from $250,000 to $2.5 million for portfolio firms to develop technologies that will become central to how Zoom clients connect, interact, and cooperate.

Major & Emerging Players in Video-as-a-Service Market:-

Zoom (United States),Microsoft (United States),Google (United States),Apple (United States),Facebook (United States),Cisco (United States),Amazon (United States),Jio (India),Jitsi (United States),WeChat (China)

The titled segments and sub-section of the market are illuminated below:

Type (Open Source, Closed Source), Application (Residential, Commercial, Industrial), Platform (Windows, MacOS, Android, IOS, Web-Based, Other), Device (Personal Computers, Tablets, Smartphones, Smart Home Devices, Other), Pricing (Monthly Subscription, Quarterly Subscription, Annual Subscription)

Market Trends:

Introduction of Features Like Background Change in Video-As-A-Service

Adoption of Encryption to Make Video-As-A-Service More Secure

Market Drivers:

Need of Flexible Work Environment

Need of Communication Between Two Far Away Points

The demand for Video-As-A-Service Due to The Convenience It Offers

Challenges:

Video-As-A-Service Is Dependant on Good Internet Quality

Video-As-A-Service Faces Security Concerns

Opportunities:

Spread of Covid-19 Pandemic Has Drastically Boosted the Demand of Video-As-A-Service

Growing Number of Employers Are Adapting Video-As-A-Service for Employees

Enquire for customization in Report @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/enquiry-before-buy/24623-global-video-as-a-service-market

Some Point of Table of Content:

Chapter One: Report OverviewChapter Two: Global Market Growth TrendsChapter Three: Value Chain of Video-as-a-Service MarketChapter Four: Players ProfilesChapter Five: Global Video-as-a-Service Market Analysis by RegionsChapter Six: North America Video-as-a-Service Market Analysis by CountriesChapter Seven: Europe Video-as-a-Service Market Analysis by CountriesChapter Eight: Asia-Pacific Video-as-a-Service Market Analysis by CountriesChapter Nine: Middle East and Africa Video-as-a-Service Market Analysis by CountriesChapter Ten: South America Video-as-a-Service Market Analysis by CountriesChapter Eleven: Global Video-as-a-Service Market Segment by TypesChapter Twelve: Global Video-as-a-Service Market Segment by Applications

What are the market factors that are explained in the Video-as-a-Service Market report?

Key Strategic Developments:Strategic developments of the market, comprising R&D, new product launch, M&A, agreements, collaborations, partnerships, joint ventures, and regional growth of the leading competitors.

Key Market Features:Including revenue, price, capacity, capacity utilization rate, gross, production, production rate, consumption, import/export, supply/demand, cost, market share, CAGR, and gross margin.

Analytical Tools:The analytical tools such as Porters five forces analysis, SWOT analysis, feasibility study, and investment return analysis have been used to analyze the growth of the key players operating in the market.

Buy This Exclusive Research Here: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/buy-now?format=1&report=24623

Definitively, this report will give you an unmistakable perspective on every single reality of the market without a need to allude to some other research report or an information source. Our report will give all of you the realities about the past, present, and eventual fate of the concerned Market.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

Contact Us:

Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)AMA Research & Media LLPUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218sales@advancemarketanalytics.com

Link:
Video-as-a-Service Market is Expected to Generate Huge Profits by 2021 2026 Bulk Solids Handling - Bulk Solids Handling