Category Archives: High Seas

');});jQuery('.entry-content p.watermarked > div.watermarked_image > img').each( function() {if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignnone') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignnone' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignleft') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignleft' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('alignright') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'alignright' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('size-medium') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'has-size-medium' );}if ( jQuery(this).hasClass('aligncenter') ) {jQuery(this).parent().addClass( 'aligncenter' );jQuery(this).parent().children().wrapAll('');}});}});});

Last week, heads of state and other world leaders, including United Nations Secretary-General Antnio Guterres, gathered in Stockholm to commemorate the anniversary of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held 50 years earlier. Many historians consider this moment to have been the dawn of the modern global environmental movement.

We understand today that the fundamental benefits of a healthy planet are not foreordained. As I sat listening to the Stockholm+50 delegates discuss the significance of the 1972 conference, the question I could not escape was, What if that meeting had never taken place? What if those leaders had never gathered and declared the environment to be a major international political issue? What would our world look like today if leaders in 1972 had NOT created the United Nations Environment Program? What if they had not galvanized a global movement to save the planet?

What happened in Stockholm 50 years ago was revolutionary. Unprecedented. Visionary. It was hard. It broke through all the pressure to develop, extract, and exploit the natural world. It changed the course of history and led us to today a moment in which environmental protection is understood to be essential to our collective prosperity, safety, and security.

Indeed, people all over the world recognize the importance of having clean air, clean water, a healthy ocean, and land that is not tainted by pollution and toxic chemicals. The leaders of this years meeting recognized in its official summary that a healthy planet is a prerequisite for peaceful, cohesive and prosperous societies.

And yet, we are again at a crossroads. One road leads to a planet further crippled by todays existential environmental challenges more plastic pollution, more greenhouse gas emissions, rising temperatures and seas, and ever greater loss of biodiversity.

The other road leads to a better future where we live sustainably with nature. A world where, by working with countries and companies all over the globe, we find a way to balance our need for natural resources with the importance of ensuring their existence for future generations.

So again, I ask, what if? What will happen if we DONT act today? What will we leave to future generations? Are we willing to consign them to a planet whose natural systems are in crisis, despite all the progress made over the last 50 years?

We cannot leave them a world drowning in plastic pollution. We can choose a different path if together we develop a global agreement that takes an ambitious, innovative, and country-driven approach to address the full life cycle of plastic. In March, countries from across the globe unanimously resolved to work with stakeholders worldwide businesses and non-profits, national governments and local communities to devise a global agreement to end the scourge of plastic pollution that is fouling every inch of this planet.

We cannot leave future generations a world with a barren ocean. We can choose a different path if together we commit to protect new areas of the ocean, address illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, and end harmful fishing subsidies. In August, we hope to reach a global agreement to conserve the resources of the high seas. And, in the next few weeks there is a chance to reach an agreement at the World Trade Organization to end fishing subsidies that are currently fueling fishing capacity at 250% of the level that corresponds to maximum sustainable catch levels.

We cannot leave behind a world devoid of nature and biodiversity. We can choose a different path if the countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity(CBD) adopt a global goal of conserving 30 percent of land and water and 30 percent of the global oceanby 2030 at the next CBD Conference of the Parties. The United States will do its part. President Biden has pledged to conserve at least 30 percent of domestic land and waters by 2030 and has encouraged other countries to do the same.

We cannot leave future generations a world that is too warm to sustain life as we know it. We are not yet moving fast enough to hold the rise in global temperature within the 1.5-degree limit. But thanks to the Paris Agreement and global innovations, we have the solutions within our grasp clean energy, more biodiversity to hold carbon, and more financial support for the women, youth, and marginalized communities that have been hit hardest by climate change.

So, what if the world had failed to act collectively in 1972? What will happen if we fail to act now? Thanks to the 1972 conference, our planet is much healthier than it would have been absent all the progress that has been made over the last 50 years. We know what it is to have clean air and clean water even as we understand that the benefits of a healthy planet are not universally experienced and that a new generation of environmental harms threaten everyones future.

We cannot fail to act, either. Looking back at Stockholm+50, lets be inspired by those who came before us and those who came together again this past week by the voices who called for bolder action then, and by the ones who do so now. Our children and grandchildren are counting on us. We cannot let them down.

Read more:

A Look at the Global Environmental Movement: What If? - United States Department of State - Department of State

Frigato Shadows of the Caribbean will be coming to PC and consoles, allowing players to get on the high seas.

Frigato: Shadows of the Caribbean, developed by debuting Mercat Games and published by Ultimate Games (Ultimate Fishing Simulator, Thief Simulator), is an upcoming real-time tactics stealth game set in the High Seas of the Caribbean. Expected to come out in 2023, the game is expected to arrive on PC, Xbox One, Xbox Series X, and the Nintendo Switch. Look forward to the games demo that will come out during the Steam Next Festival this June.

Frigato: Shadows of the Caribbean is a real-time stealth tactical game with an isometric view, focused on single-player gameplay. The player will command a crew of sea dogs and face a wide array of challenges. A wisely prepared plan and tactical sense will be key to success. In the game, players can gain notoriety as an elusive pirate-gentleman, but he can also become known as a bloody terror in the Caribbean. In short, players have control over how they will portray themselves in the game. The game will offer different approaches in solving the games objectives, with numerous side quests and secrets waiting to be discovered.

In Frigato, says Mercat Games Game Designer Jakub Brzeziski, we combine the elements of pirate adventures, ark legends and rowdy humour into a unique world. The game will loosely refer to the so-called golden age of piracy the 17th and 18th century. Gaemplay-wise, it should appeal to fans of games like Shadow Tactics, Desperados, Commandos, War Mongrels and Partisans 1941.

Frigato: Shadows of the Caribbean features:

Being a fan of Shadow Tactics myself, Im looking forward to the games demo later this month so I can try something similar set in the high seas. Im a big fan of pirates, too, so I hope this game can deliver some relief from this long-standing Sid Meiers Pirates! itch that Ive been having.

Interested? You can wishlist the game on Steam now through the games Store page.

Visit link:

Frigato Shadows of the Caribbean announced for PC and consoles - ClutchPoints

OTTAWA, ON, June 5, 2022 /CNW/ - June 5th is the International Day for the Fight against Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing.

Globally, IUU fishing is a major contributor to declining fish stocks and marine habitat ecosystem destruction. It is estimated that IUU fishing accounts for about 30 per cent of all fishing activity worldwide, representing up to 26 million tonnes of fish caught annually.

It hurts the livelihoods of law-abiding fish harvesters around the world, at a cost to the global economy of up to $23 billion a year. It impacts food security, human rights, and the economic stability of vulnerable coastal communities where fish resources are threatened by IUU fishing, affecting millions of people. Addressing IUU fishing is a key objective of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for life below water.

That is why Canada continues to work with our domestic and international partners on the latest advancements in technology, enforcement operations, and policy in the fight against the harms of IUU fishing.

This past year, we partnered with the UK-based non-profit OceanMind on a project to evaluate the use of drones in fisheries monitoring. Working with partners in Costa Rica and Senegal, this project saw over 40 successful test flights and provided us with a roadmap to help developing countries in their fight against IUU fishing.

In partnership with Ecuador, we have deployed our state-of-the-art Dark Vessel Detectionprogram to help protect the recently expanded Galapagos Islands Marine Reserve, an area regarded as one of the most unique and biodiverse marine ecosystems on the planet, from the threats posed by industrial-scale foreign fishing fleets.

We address IUU fishing internationally through the development of strong rules and comprehensive guidance at regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs), and the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). These efforts drive Canada's important continued enforcement work and joint operations with the United States and other partners under Operation North Pacific Guard. Through this mission, our fishery officers conduct international high-seas fisheries law enforcement operations.

We must learn from each other to innovate and collaborate in the fight against IUU fishing. By utilizing the latest technologies and taking an innovative approach to the protection of the world's oceans, we can help address the critical issues fish stocks and marine ecosystems are facing.

The Honourable Joyce Murray, Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard

Associated Links:

Stay Connected

This news release may be made available in alternative formats for persons living with visual disabilities.

SOURCE Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Canada

Here is the original post:

Government of Canada continues to innovate in the fight against illegal fishing on the high seas - Benzin - Benzinga

What do your muscles do when you lift a heavy object? What happens in your brain when you go for a run? How do visual effects studios digitally capture human movement for use in a video game or movie?

Local high school students learned firsthand about all those concepts at the National Biomechanics Day hosted by the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) at the Science and Engineering Complex. The program was organized by researchers in the Harvard Biodesign Lab, led by Conor J. Walsh, Paul A. Maeder Professor of Engineering and Applied Sciences at SEAS.

I was really proud of our team that they were able to have the initiative to organize a jam-packed agenda that went over lots of different topics, Walsh said.

Krithika Swaminathan, a Ph.D. student in Walshs lab, was the lead organizer for the event, which was supported by a grant through the Women in Biomechanics Initiative. Despite some early concerns about turnout, more than twice as many students signed up as there were spaces available, with a final attendance of 27, more than half of whom identified as female or non-binary.

We have quite a lot of cool measurement tools and really interesting ways of understanding human movement, so we thought it would be great to allow students in the area to come and experience what that looks like, Swaminathan said. A lot of us didnt know much about these subjects before college or even graduate school, so it was something we felt would be nice to share with high schoolers.

The event began with presentations by the Biodesign Lab team and Paul Devita, founder and director of the Biomechanics Initiative. After that, students got to experience hands-on biomechanics research, as they built their own inflatable wrist braces.

If you have these inflatable pouches arranged in a smart way, you can dictate the way in which the bodys joints move, Swaminathan said. Despite the simplicity of the device, students were able to gain hands-on experience with a common actuation mechanism of soft wearable devices, the associated challenges, and the resultant changes in their biomechanics while wearing the inflated brace.

From there, the event shifted to the SECs new Motion Capture Lab, where students got a chance to experience how motion capture works, test their muscle torque and activation through tools such as a dynamometer, experience electromyography and functional electrical stimulation of the muscles, learn about exosuits and robotic gloves developed to help in rehabilitation from a stroke or spinal cord injury, and learn about lower-cost tools that can make biomechanics research more accessible.

We were showing them different ways you can use your phone or other wearable sensing mechanisms to determine range of motion and other clinically relevant metrics, Swaminathan said.

Originally posted here:

National Biomechanics Day at SEAS - Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

California officials will decide today whether to approve construction of a seawall to prevent the rising ocean from destroying a crumbling cliff that supports tracks for one of the nations busiest Amtrak lines.

The vote thrusts the California Coastal Commission into a debate over how to protect the railway carrying 50 trains a day from the effects of climate change. Other proposed solutions include stabilizing the bluff with steel pillars. Theres also a plan to relocate the tracks, a major undertaking thats estimated to cost billions of dollars.

Agency staff have recommended building the seawall at the bottom of a bluff near Del Mar, a beach town where multimillion-dollar houses are threatened by erosion 19 miles north of San Diego.

The railroad runs atop coastal bluffs which are generally 50 to 70 feet high and have a history of landslides and slope failure, said a report by Coastal Commission staff. The proposed project would stabilize areas along the bluffs.

Californias move to protect transportation infrastructure from the immediate effects of climate change comes as roadways, coastlines and residential property around the country face growing risks from intensifying storms, heavier downpours and penetrating ocean waters. The Government Accountability Office warned in a report last month that ballooning disaster costs related to climate change are creating an unsustainable fiscal future.

The federal government alone owns and operates hundreds of thousands of facilities and manages millions of acres of land that might be vulnerable to climate change, the GAO said (Climatewire, May 10).

The debate over the seawall comes as California officials wrestle with how to save the states iconic beaches. A U.S. Geological Survey study in 2017 said rising seawater could destroy two-thirds of all beaches in Southern California if steps arent taken to reduce carbon emissions or adapt to higher oceans.

Already, homes have toppled off cliffs in Pacifica, along bluffs near San Francisco and in Sonoma County. In other beach cities, seawater floods the streets during the highest tides.

The potential approval today would mark a shift for the Coastal Commission, which in recent years resisted permitting many seawalls because they can deplete sand from the beaches in front of them. One of the commissions official missions is to preserve public access to beaches. That has often put the agency at odds with oceanfront homeowners who say seawalls are needed to protect their property.

But the commissions powers are limited in this case, said Laura Walsh, California policy manager at Surfrider Foundation. The San Diego Association of Governments, or SANDAG, a regional planning group, proposed building the barricade to protect the rail line. SANDAG also has sought approval from the Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, the Federal Railroad Administration is providing partial funding for the project. That means all the commission can do is rule whether the proposed seawall is consistent with the California Coastal Act, a beach protection law, Walsh said.

More than 50 trains a day travel on the tracks that curve along the Southern California coast, offering panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean. But the bluffs are crumbling as higher waves chew away at the base of cliffs. Flooding on the tracks has forced local authorities to stop or slow trains repeatedly (Climatewire, Dec. 2, 2019).

The threatened track carries the second-busiest Amtrak route in the country. The train linking San Diego with Orange County, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara and beyond transported 841,000 passengers last year, trailing only the Acela line that connects Boston with New York and Washington. A local commuter line, a freight company and the military also use the California tracks.

The proposed seawalls would be linked to other barriers installed during emergency repairs to the tracks. All together,, the seawall would cover approximately 2,500 feet and stand 7 to 8 feet above the ground, the Coastal Commission report said.

Local communities are objecting to the project. Del Mar residents argue it would cut off beach access for residents, said Terry Gaasterland, a Del Mar City Council member.

It also would cause beach erosion, she said, as waves carry off sand in front of the wall. In other locations where seawalls were used, such as in the Chesapeake Bay, she said rocks, or riprap, eventually must be placed in front of the wall to cover a gap created by wave action.

Over a 30-year period, these walls are going to become this horrible thing, Gaasterland said. They have to reinforce with riprap at the bottom of the wall. You know more sand goes away. Its just this negative feedback loop.

The staff recommendation to allow the walls includes several conditions, including that SANDAG remove the walls and restore the bluff in 30 years. That presumes that the tracks would be relocated.

SANDAG wants to move the tracks by 2035 but currently lacks the estimated $2.3 billion needed for the effort. SANDAG also hasnt settled on a location for moving the tracks (Climatewire, Jan. 25).

Hasan Ikhrata, CEO of SANDAG, said the group hopes to get $250 million to $300 million from the state to fund environmental review and design for moving the train.

Some Del Mar residents also argue the seawall would ruin the appearance of the craggy natural bluff for at least the next 30 years, potentially harming its ability to attract visitors. More than 3 million tourists visit the city annually. The average price of a home in the area is $3.7 million, according to Zillow.

Instead of a seawall, Del Mar advocates want to use soldier piles, or vertical steel beams drilled into the ground, to support the train tracks.

Ive been told that engineering wise, the soldier piles are the most stabilizing thing that can be done that thats actually the thing thats the safest for the tracks, Gaasterland said.

Ikhrata said the soldier piles alone wont suffice.

We dont think the piles by themselves are going to stabilize the bluff and make it safe for us, he said. To stabilize the bluff and keep the trains moving at the speeds they are, we do need to do both the piles and the seawall.

Coastal Commission staff argues that using just soldier piles would require more excavation and alteration of the bluff face, the report said. As such, it would be more difficult to remove the development and restore the bluff to a more natural condition once the tracks have been relocated, as compared to the proposed seawalls and surface stabilization.

Del Mar has tangled with the Coastal Commission previously. It was one of the first local governments to say it wouldnt accept efforts to plan for managed retreat, the idea of removing structures along the shore so the ocean can migrate naturally.

Many oceanfront homes in the community have seawalls. Those have been allowed for the most part because the houses were built before 1977, when a beach protection law known as the California Coastal Act made it more difficult to build barriers.

Gaasterland, the City Council member, said those walls are well above sea level, and therefore dont contribute to as much beach erosion as the proposed wall for the railroad tracks.

Read this article:

Train threatened by rising seas could be saved with a wall - E&E News

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) has given the Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) for several capital acquisition projects of the Indian defence forces. This includes the procurement of next-generation Corvettes for the Indian Navy at an approximate cost of Rs 36,000 crore. A look at the features of these naval vessels and their efficacy in the modern naval battlefield.

A Corvette is the smallest class of naval ships and it falls below the warship class of a frigate. These are highly agile ships and are categorised as missile boats, anti-submarine ships, coastal patrol crafts and fast attack naval vessels. The word corvette itself is derived from French and Dutch origin. Corvettes date back to the 18th and the 19th century when they were extensively used in the naval warfare duels that were fought at high seas. However, these were powered by sails and masts, and disappeared for a while when steam powered naval ships made their appearance. During World War II, the term Corvette was used to describe vessels which had anti-submarine roles assigned to them. Modern Corvettes can go up to 2,000 tons in displacement which helps in keeping them agile.

The Indian Navy at present has the Kamorta Class Corvettes, which are also known as Project 28. These ships have an anti-submarine role and are manufactured at Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers in Kolkata. The four Kamorta Class Corvettes that the Indian Navy possesses are named INS Kamorta, INS Kadmatt, INS Kiltan and INS Kavaratti. The first of these was commissioned in 2014 and the last one in 2020.

Newsletter | Click to get the days best explainers in your inbox

The next-generation Corvettes will be manufactured for various roles like surveillance missions, escort operations, deterrence, surface action group operations, search and attack and coastal defence. It is worth noting that these roles will be in addition to the anti-submarine roles being already performed by the existing Corvettes in the Navy.

As per the AoN accorded by the DAC, these next-generation generation Corvettes will be constructed based on new in-house design of the Indian Navy using latest technology of ship buildings and would contribute to further the governments initiative of Security and Growth for all in the region (SAGAR).

The in-service Kamorta Class Corvettes also have a high degree of indigenous equipment being used on the platform. This includes Bharat Electronic Limited (BEL) manufactured Shikari sensor and processing system and Bomber and Electronic Warfare Suits also manufactured by BEL and named Ajanta. These vessels also have the Sanket electronic warfare systems and Kavach decoy launchers.

See the original post:

Explained: Next-generation Corvettes, and the combat edge Navy seeks through them - The Indian Express

(Bangkok) The Thai government should provide recently rescued Rohingya asylum seekers with assistance and immediate access to procedures to determine their refugee status, Human Rights Watch said today.

On June 4, 2022, the Thai navy found 59 Rohingya 31 men, 23 women, and 5 children from Myanmar stranded on Koh Dong Island near Satun province in southern Thailand. The navy took them ashore and detained them at the 436 Border Patrol Police unit. Thai officials who questioned them said these Rohingya were abandoned by smugglers, who charged them about 60,000 Thai baht (US$1,750) per person for a journey to Malaysia.

The Thai government should end its policy of summarily locking up rescued Rohingya people and throwing away the key, saidElaine Pearson, acting Asia director at Human Rights Watch. Thailand should permit the United Nations refugee agency to screen all Rohingya arriving in Thailand to identify and assist those seeking refugee status.

To protect Rohingya asylum seekers, it is crucial for the Thai government to permit the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to conduct refugee status determination interviews, Human Rights Watch said.

Like its predecessors, the Thai government of Prime Minister Gen. Prayut Chan-ocha has treated Rohingya arriving at the border as illegal immigrants, detaining them insqualid lockups. According to one Western embassy in Bangkok, Thai officials are holding more than 470 Rohingya in indefinite immigration detention with no access to refugee status determination procedures. Thai authorities have not permitted UNHCR to conduct refugee status determinations for them. Thailand also discriminates against Rohingya by refusing to allow them to register as legally documented migrant workers, unlike other people coming from Myanmar.

Meanwhile, the Thai navy announced that it will maintain a policy to intercept Rohingya boats that come too close to the coast. After providing them with fuel, food, water, and other supplies, the navy will push those boats pushed onward to Malaysia or Indonesia. This amounts to a continuation of Thailands deadly pushback policy, which has resulted in Rohingya boats going missing on the high seas and people dying, Human Rights Watch said.

The Thai navy further stated that any boat that somehow lands on Thai shores will be seized, and immigration officials will arrest the men, women, and children aboard on illegal entry charges and detain them.

Thai authorities have, for years, said they do not want to accept Rohingya as refugees. However, under international law, Thailand cannot summarily reject at the border the claims of asylum seekers fleeing persecution. Thailand is obligated not to return them before providing a full and fair assessment of their claims for international protection, Human Rights Watch said.

The Myanmar government and military have long persecuted the Rohingya, members of a Muslim ethnic minority group who have lived in Myanmars Rakhine State for generations, driving them to flee repression and dire poverty. The situation has significantly worsened since August 2017, when the Myanmar military committedethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity against the Rohingya.

Given the lack of security and overcrowded, unsanitary and dangerous camp conditions where many Rohingya are forced to live in Bangladesh, many have risked harsh weather conditions on the Andaman Sea to embark on dangerous journeys to Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia, often falling prey to human trafficking gangs.

The Thai government should help the oppressed Rohingya, not worsen their suffering, Pearson said. The Thai government should immediately allow them access to desperately needed protection.

See original here:

Thailand: Allow Newly Arrived Rohingya Access to Asylum - Human Rights Watch

New Morning Consult Poll Shows Broad Support for Increasing Sustainability for Seafood

PBS NewsHour's Tipping Point: Fisheries on the Brink focuses on Protecting our Oceans

WASHINGTON, June 7, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- A new Morning Consult poll commissioned by the Walton Family Foundation shows a majority of Americans (70%) want their seafood to be sourced sustainably and that Americans want to know where their food is processed (65%), an important step in ensuring seafood is sourced by companies with high environmental and human rights standards.

Released ahead of World Oceans Day, this new data shows near-universal agreement on the need to protect the oceans, and that Americans are committed to sustainable seafood as a means of keeping the oceans' fragile ecosystem in balance.

"The challenges of climate change intersect with building resilient food systems in our world's oceans," said Moira Mcdonald, Environment Program Director at the Walton Family Foundation. "At the Walton Family Foundation, we focus on sustainable seafood because we know that when you take care of the fish, you're necessarily taking care of everything else that matters in the ocean. So, that means being smart about how much we fish, what we fish and where we fish."

Traceability of seafood, meaning where it is caught, processed, and sold, has become an increasingly important and topical issue as sanctions against Russia have made tracing the origin of seafood even more consequential. Currently, less than halfof the seafood that comes into the United States has traceability requirements.

"Americans want to know where the seafood they eat comes from and that responsible fishing practices are being used," said Mcdonald. "We need industry and government to work together to strengthen our systems so that fishers who are doing the right thing are not at a competitive disadvantage."

PBS NewsHour science correspondent and Tipping Point executive producer, Miles O'Brien, will host a live-streamed special, "Tipping Point: Fisheries on the Brink" to explore the connections between climate change, warming oceans, migrating fish populations, the economic stressors facing fishermen and the fishing industry, bad actors on the high seas, and ever-growing seafood demand this Wednesday, June 8th at 7:00 p.m. ET. The special includes live and recorded interviews with various officials, scientists, fishermen, and thought leaders including United States special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry, biologist Daniel Pauly, "The Climate Diet" author Paul Greenberg, Princeton professor Curtis Deutsch, and others.

The Walton Family Foundation is a proud principal sponsor of the program, which can be viewed onlineand on NewsHour's social platforms, including YouTube, Twitterand Facebook.

About the Walton Family FoundationThe Walton Family Foundation is, at its core, a family-led foundation. Three generations of the descendants of our founders, Sam and Helen Walton, and their spouses, work together to lead the foundation and create access to opportunity for people and communities. We work in three areas: improving K-12 education, protecting rivers and oceans and the communities they support, and investing in our home region of Northwest Arkansas and the Arkansas-Mississippi Delta. To learn more, visit waltonfamilyfoundation.org and follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

SOURCE Walton Family Foundation

Read more from the original source:

Walton Family Foundation Urges Action on Seafood Traceability Ahead of World Oceans Day - PR Newswire

Forecasts have warned of thunderstorms and lightning moving across the central belt.

The Met office has issued a yellow alert for heavy, slow-moving downpours, which are likely to hit Glasgow and Edinburgh today.

The thick band of rain is predicted to move across the country between 1pm and 8pm, and stretch as far south as Newcastle.

It brings the risk of lightning strikes affecting power lines, heavy spray on the roads and possible localised flooding.

A second warning for rough seas and high waves for the North West of Scotland has also been issued.

As well as thunder, rain and lightning, thereis also the chance the storms could bring hail, and people are being advised to take care on the roads.

The Met Office warning said: Where flooding or lightning strikes occur, there is a chance of delays and some cancellations to train and bus services

Spray and sudden flooding could lead to difficult driving conditions and some road closure.

There is a slight chance that power cuts could occur and other services to some homes and businesses could be lost.

View original post here:

Scotland's weather: Thunder and lightning warning issues by the Met Office | HeraldScotland - HeraldScotland

Projects aim to bring salmon population back from crisis point.

New funding of 500,000 will support the development of wild salmon conservation measures.

The money will be used for two projects, the National Adult Sampling Plan which provides crucial data on wild salmon stock and the development of a standardised fisheries management plan template which can be used by all the fisheries management areas in Scotland.

Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon will announce the funding as part of a speech to international delegates and Scottish stakeholders at the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organisation (NASCO) annual meeting this evening.

It follows the publication of the Scottish Governments Wild Salmon Strategy which aims to bring the wild salmon population in Scotland back from crisis point.

An implementation plan for the strategy will be introduced by the end of the year.

Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said: I am looking forward to addressing NASCO delegates conference and highlighting the significant work that is being done in Scotland to reverse the decline in wild salmon stocks.

In addition to the measures we will take in Scotland, we are committed to supporting and pushing forward collective action in the international arena, so the young salmon leaving our rivers survive the many challenges they face on the high seas to return to their home river to spawn the next generation.

Recently published salmon fishery statistics continue to confirm the downward trend in the numbers of wild salmon returning to Scottish rivers and we must now reinvigorate our collective efforts to ensure a positive future for the species.

Although the pattern of decline is repeated across the salmons North Atlantic range, with climate change a significant factor, there remains much that we can do in our rivers, lochs and coastal waters to seek to build resilience and transform the fortunes of this iconic fish.

Only by acting together, at home and overseas, and applying our collective resource, knowledge and expertise can we hope to change the fortunes of this iconic and vital species.

Scotland is a stronghold for salmon, which start their lives in streams and rivers, migrate to the high seas to grow and return home to spawn, connecting diverse habitats over a vast area.

Salmon are affected by a wide range of pressures, some at sea, but many others acting within the Scottish freshwater and coastal environments. A key contributory factor appears to be climate change.

Background

Salmon live in fresh water for 1-4 years before undertaking a long migration north to their feeding grounds in the North Atlantic. After 1-3 years at sea, adults often return to the river in which they were hatched to spawn and begin the next generation.

Details on the funded projects:

National Adult Sampling Programme

Development of Fisheries Management Plans

200,000 (including 100,000 from Crown Estate Scotland) to develop a standardised fisheries management plan template which can be used by all the fisheries management areas in Scotland. The plans will allow data to be collected on: environmental characteristics of the area; the status of the fish populations salmon and sea trout; the pressures facing wild salmon in the area; current actions and future management options to protect and restore the fish and fisheries. Fisheries Management Scotland and its members will be involved in the development of the fisheries management plan template and technological solutions required. Funding will be provided to all fisheries boards and trusts.

Go here to read the rest:

Funding to support salmon recovery - gov.scot - Scotland.gov.uk