Category Archives: Google

Google recently launched the Open Usage Commons (OUC) foundation to offer open source projects support specific to trademark protection and management, usage guidelines, and conformance testing, according to the OUCs website. Seems sort of bland, right? Well, maybe.

Depending on who you are, you either hate OUC or you love it. On the hate side seem to be IBM and the Linux Foundationon the record, and others off. On the love side seems to be just Google, though a rising chorus of experienced open sourcerors like Shaun Connolly and Adam Jacobhave suggested that maybe, just maybe, this isnt the end of open source as we know it.

However, if your response to a foundation to shepherd trademarks is Huh?, its worth trying to unpack what just happened with OUC, and why it matters.

Confused turtles all the way down

At issue in all of this is governance, though OUC doesnt have anything to say about governance. Not directly, anyway. All OUC does is provide a place for open source projects to park their trademarks. Nor is OUC the first foundation to do so: the Linux Foundation, Software Freedom Conservancy, and others also provide this service.

The difference with OUC, however, is that trademark protection and management is all that it does. As OUC board member (and former Googler) Miles Ward put it:

If such benevolent experimentation seems a bit too convenient, well, theres no shortage of cynical or Oliver Stone-level conspiracy theories to explain it all. OUC, for example, is completely staffed by current or past Google employees, or academics who have received funding from Google. Its hardly a neutral organisation.

With this in mind, some suspect Google instituted OUC as a way to ensure that a Kubernetes never happened again. Yes, Kubernetes has been an incredible success for Google, but it has also been an incredible success for Googles competitors. Some believe that not enough of the financial rewards have gone to Google.

But if this is the suspicion, the OUC seems to go out of its way to allow others to profit from OUC projects. To wit, the OUC FAQ says:

Well, what about governance? OUC explicitly disavows any impact on governance or source code licensing. According to Googles open source chief Chris DiBona, OUC doesnt change anything [related to governance] for good or for bad. If your perception is that [Istio governance] needs to be fixed, then it still needs to be fixed.

Does this mean that Istio or Angular or Gerrit, the three projects used to seed the OUC, could later be contributed to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, or another foundation? It seems the answer is yes.

But doesnt Google control these projects, with a new neutral-sounding but still-controlling lock on trademarks? Well, maybe. But if we look at the Istio steering committee its the same 60/40 split as before (Google has six members while IBM/Red Hat has four).

What about Angular? Yes, its contributor crowd is mostly made up of Googlers, but not exclusively so. Gerrit? Half of its maintainers dont work for Google.

This needs to be kept in mind when reading open source legal expertAndy Updegroves comments to Steven Vaughan-Nichols: A project that is primarily important to a single vendor and primarily staffed and controlled by developers employed by that employer can continue to exercise effective control while avoiding the market suspicion that might arise if the vendor owned the mark.

Hes right, but theres also an existing governance structure in place for these projects that OUC doesnt eradicate.

Promises, promises

Strip away all of the bilious bickering associated with OUC and it feels like the heart of the matter is unfulfilled expectations.

As CNCF executive Chris Aniszczyk stresses, this is really about one company lying to their community partners and dragging their feet for a couple years. [Lets] focus on the loss of trust here... and why a new gerrymandered org was necessary vs. ASF [Apache Software Foundation], EF [Eclipse Foundation], SPI [Software in the Public Interest], etc. Lying is a strong accusation. What is Aniszczyk talking about?

For years vendors like IBM, a co-creator of Istio (one of the three projects Google contributed to OUC), worked on Istio under an implied (or actual) promise, as IBMs Jason McGee writes:

Whether OUC affects a projects governance (it shouldnt, at least as outlined in its charter), this allegedly broken promise is the issue. As much as I recognise this concern (and know, respect, and am friends with people on both sides of the issue), ultimately it may be too soon to predetermine OUCs impact.

Its quite possible, as John Mark Walker has noted, theres a large number of individuals with GitHub projects who have no desire to officially join a foundation, but who would benefit from low-touch trademark protection.

It could be, as Shaun Connolly points out, that OUC could be a real boon for individuals with open source projects, without denting the need for larger projects to get white glove treatment from a foundation like the Linux Foundation.

So, could OUC be good? Sure. Could it be a veiled attempt by Google to control the universe? I guess? But were really not at a point where we can draw a final conclusion.

It will be worthwhile to watch how the governance of the Istio, Angular, and Gerrit projects evolves in light of OUC, as well as take note of the market adoption of OUC by other projects. Stay tuned.

Error: Please check your email address.

Original post:

What is Google's Open Usage Commons - and why? - Reseller News

A simple pair of sunglasses that projects holographic icons. A smartwatch that has a digital screen but analog hands. A temporary tattoo that, when applied to your skin, transforms your body into a living touchpad. A virtual reality controller that lets you pick up objects in digital worlds and feel their weight as you swing them around. Those are some of the projects Google has quietly been developing or funding, according to white papers and demo videos, in an effort to create the next generation of wearable technology devices.

The eyewear and smartwatch projects come from the search giant's Interaction Lab, an initiative aimed at intertwining digital and physical experiences. It's part of Google Research, an arm of the search giant with roots in academia that focuses on technical breakthroughs. The Interaction Lab was created within Google's hardware division in 2015, before it was spun out to join the company's research arm about two years ago, according to the resume of Alex Olwal, the lab's leader. Olwal, a senior Google researcher, previously worked at X, the company's self-described moonshot factory, and ATAP, Google's experimental hardware branch.

The goal of the Interaction Lab is to expand Google's "capabilities for rapid hardware prototyping of wearable concepts and interface technology," Olwal writes. Its initiatives appear to be more science experiment than product roadmap, with the likely goal of proving ideas rather than competing with the Apple Watch or Snapchat Spectacles. But taken together, they provide a glimpse at Google's ambitions for wearable tech.

The other projects were collaborations with researchers from universities around the world. At least two of them -- the VR controller and smart tattoos -- were partly funded throughGoogle Faculty Research Awards, which support academic work related to computer science and engineering. The efforts highlight Google's close ties with the academic community, a bridge to the company's beginnings as a Stanford University grad school project by co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin that grew into a global behemoth with deep hooks into our lives.

Google and Olwal confirmed the company had developed or funded the projects.

The experiments could play a critical role in coming years as tech giants open up a new battlefront in wearable tech. Many in the industry see it as the next major computing platform after smartphones. Google, Apple, Amazon, Samsung and Facebook -- through its virtual reality subsidiary Oculus -- have all released wearables, including watches, rings, earbuds and jean jackets. Almost 370 million wearable devices will be shipped this year, forecasts the research firm IDC, growing to more than 525 million in two years.

It isn't just about selling hardware. Getting sensor packed-devices onto consumers could mean a treasure trove of data beyond what people produce on their phones or at their desks. It's an especially valuable haul for Google, which makes more than $160 billion a year, mostly through targeted ads that are informed by the personal data of people who use its services. The gadgets also create inroads to lucrative new businesses for tech giants, like health and fitness, though lawmakers and regulators have privacy concerns about Silicon Valley's ever-expanding scope.

Google has been trying to get a toehold in wearables for years but hasn't quite found the spot. In 2012, the company unveiled Silicon Valley's most notorious foray into wearable technology: Google Glass eyewear. The device was maligned from the start and ultimately flopped. Google has also developed an operating system specifically for smartwatches and other devices, called Wear OS, though it's earned little more than a niche following.

Recently, however, the company has made a more determined push. Last month, it acquired North, a Canadian company that makes smart glasses called Focals, reportedly for $180 million. Google last year announced a $2.1 billion deal to acquire Fitbit, the struggling fitness tracker pioneer, in an attempt to bolster Google's hardware operation. The buyout has sparked alarm among critics worried about Google's ability to strong-arm its way into new industries and buy the health data of millions of people.

It's to get ahead of the curve. By learning about the consumer in different ways that other companies aren't doing yet, even if it's an incomplete picture.

Tuong Nguyen, Gartner

Making advancements in new wearable form factors, like smart fabrics, is crucial, says Tuong Nguyen, an analyst at the research firm Gartner. "It's to get ahead of the curve," he says. "By learning about the consumer in different ways that other companies aren't doing yet, even if it's an incomplete picture."

Each project is accompanied by an academic white paper, photos and demo videos, as is customary with work done at Google Research. The videos are intended as a showcase of findings for researchers, instead of the slickly produced marketing clips you'd see on stage at a Google launch event. Olwal and Google are listed as authors on all of the papers, but only the eyewear and hybrid watch projects list an affiliation with the Interaction Lab.

The company has already publicly demoed one of the Interaction Lab's projects. The I/O Braid, which the search giant showed off at an AI event in San Francisco in January, allows people to control a device by interacting with a wire. The Braid lets someone, for example, start, stop and control the volume of music on a phone by twisting or pinching the fabric wire of earbuds.

But other efforts of the lab, as well as other wearable tech projects Olwal has been involved with for Google, haven't previously been given a spotlight. Here are a few of them:

1D Eyewear, a Google smart glasses project, was developed by the Interaction Lab.

When Google unveiled Glass, born out of the company's X moonshot factory, critics mocked it endlessly. People were put off by the device's cyborg-like design. A chunky block of glass sat in front of one eye, and the device's processors were housed inside its thick frame and earpiece. Its geeky design, coupled with a fierce privacy backlash, pushed Google to discontinue the consumer version in 2015. Now it's mostly a tool for warehouse workers and other businesses.

The 1D Eyewear project, from the Interaction Lab, appears designed to succeed where Glass most importantly failed -- getting people to want to wear the tech in the first place. The goal is to make the device minimalistic enough that it can still be stylish (though the prototype appears to have a thick earpiece as well).

"The requirement to fit all the electronics, optics and image-generating components, in addition to batteries of sufficient capacity, greatly affects the possible industrial design options," Olwal and his team write in a white paper describing the device. "The variations of styles that end users may choose from is thus limited by these constraints, with reduced flexibility in wearability and aesthetics."

The Interactive Lab's solution is an understated pair of shades that pairs with an Android device and projects holographic icons and colored lights over a wearer's eyes. For example, when using a navigation app, a blinking yellow light you'd see above the left frame tells you to turn left. A light above the right frame points you in that direction. Other notifications are color-coded: A flashing blue light means you're getting a calendar reminder, yellow is for Gmail, and green is for chat or phone notifications.

A test of the device's hologram system.

The glasses also display 16 different holograms that are projected using laser beams. The pictures are simple line drawings of "common icons for mobile devices," the white paper explains. One is of a phone, another is of a speaker that looks like a volume control tool. It's unclear how they can be used.

The device's development has apparently touched other teams at Google. After the Glass initiative was shelved, the company said it would reimagine the failed project under a new initiative called Aura. It was placed under Google's Advanced Technology and Projects group, or ATAP. In the 1D Eyewear white paper, its engineers list the Google Glass, Aura and X teams as "collaborators." 1D Eyewear is similar to the Aura project, but a Google spokesman said the two are not related.

Grabity, a VR controller, was a collaborative project with researchers at Stanford.

Virtual reality platforms like Facebook's Oculus or HTC's Vive can transport you to another digital world. But those worlds are only as immersive as your ability to explore the environments they create. A device called Grabity, developed in collaboration with researchers at Stanford, is designed to simulate the feeling of grasping and picking up objects in VR.

The prototype isn't worn like a glove but slips onto your thumb and index finger like a boxy controller strapped to your hand. It positions your fingers as if you're holding a soda can. The device uses gentle vibrations, or haptics, to mimic the sensation of picking up a small item in VR games. The haptics are meant to replicate the skin stretching on your fingertips when you've grasped something. To emit the vibrations to your hands, the device contains two small motors called voice coil actuators. The bottom of the gadget has an arm that swings back and forth, giving you a feeling of inertia as you wave the item around in your hand.

"We need to think about how we perceive weight," Inrak Choi, one of the project's researchers, and a Ph.D. student at Stanford's Shape Lab, said during a presentation on Grabity in 2017. "Basically it is the combination of multiple sensory systems on the human body." The project was funded partially through a Google Faculty Research Award, according to a white paper on Grabity from 2017.

Choi didn't respond to a request for comment.

Google has struggled with VR. While Facebook and other companies have invested in powerful platforms that require high-end computing power for their VR products, Google has relied mostly on mobile phones. Meanwhile, Facebook's Oculus Quest, the wireless headset, is having a moment. In May, the company announced that consumers have spent more than $100 million on Quest content.

Google made its first foray into VR in 2014 with Cardboard. As the name suggests, a square of cardboard is used to cradle your phone, converting it into a VR headset. Two years later, the company unveiled Daydream, a more polished version of the concept that required juiced-up processing but was still built around using your phone as the brains of the operation. Google quietly shuttered the platform last year.

The company's work with Grabity, though, suggests Google has thought about more complex VR experiences -- with experimental hardware to go with it.

Google developed smart tattoo prototypes with researchers at Saarland University in Germany.

A project called SkinMarks uses rub-on tattoos to transform your skin into a touchpad.

Here's how it works: The tattoos, which are loaded with sensors, are applied to a part of the body, like the ridge of a person's knuckles or the side of a finger. The sensors can be triggered by traditional touch or swipe gestures, like you'd use on your phone. But there are also a few gestures that are more specific to working on the skin's surface. You could squeeze the area around the tattoo or bend your fingers or limbs to activate the sensors.

The benefit of using your skin as an interface, the researchers write in a 2017white paper, is tapping into the fine motor skills that human beings naturally have. Being able to bend and squeeze is instinctive, so the movements make it more natural to engage with technology. Interacting with your own skin and limbs also means you can do it without looking.

The tattoos are made by screen printing conductive ink onto tattoo paper. The paper is then thermal-cured so it can be applied to the skin. Some of the prototype tattoos include cartoon drawings or light up displays. The experiment, led by researchers at Saarland University in Germany, is partly funded through a Google Faculty Research Award.

"Through a vastly reduced tattoo thickness and increased stretchability, a SkinMark is sufficiently thin and flexible to conform to irregular geometry, like flexure lines and protruding bones," the researchers write.

The tattoos can be applied to uneven surfaces, like the ridge of a person's knuckles.

Google isn't the only tech giant that has experimented with skin in moonshot projects. In 2017, Facebook unveiled a project that could let people "hear" and decipher words through vibrations on their skin. The concept is similar to braille, in which tiny bumps represent letters and other elements of language. But instead of running your hand over those bumps, you'd feel frequencies in different patterns on your forearm from a sleeve worn on your wrist.

The initiative was one of the marquee projects of Building 8, Facebook's experimental hardware lab. After major struggles, the lab was shuttered a year later.

SmartSleeve is a high-tech textile project.

Two other projects, called SmartSleeve and StretchEBand, are focused on weaving sensors into fabrics.

The SmartSleeve prototype looks like a shooter sleeve that a basketball player might wear. Sensors are pressure-sensitive and threaded into the material. The sleeve can read 22 different types of gestures, including twisting, stretching and folding the fabric. It can also interpret when users bend their arms or push the fabric toward their elbows.

In a demo video, researchers give the example of the tech being used to control video playback. Bending your arm starts and pauses the video. Running your finger up and down the sleeve rewinds and fast forwards. Twisting the fabric like a knob turns the volume up or down.

The goal of the project appears to be similar to that of Google's Jacquard initiative, also aimed at creating smart clothing and accessories. Jacquard, which was announced in 2015, has developed a handful of products with internet-connected fabrics, including a denim jacket made in partnership with Levi's. The jacket lets people control music or get traffic updates by swiping the sleeve cuff. A luxury backpack, unveiled last year with Yves Saint Laurent, has a touch- and tap-enabled strap. Most recently, Google partnered with Adidas and Electronic Arts to make a smart shoe sole.

Another project called StretchEBand also weaves sensors into fabrics, like the band of a watch, a cellphone case, a stuffed animal or the interior of a car. In one example shown in a demo video, pulling on the strap of a car seat handle can recline or adjust the seat. In another, straps attached to the top and bottom of a phone case are used to scroll up or down.

The SmartSleeve project was developed with researchers at the University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria and at Saarland University. The StretchEBand was developed just with researchers at the Austrian school.

Google's Interaction Lab developed a watch with a digital screen and analog hands.

Another Interaction Lab project meshes the worlds of analog and smart watches. The project, which the lab only refers to as "hybrid watch user interfaces," uses the old-school hour and minute hands you'd find on a traditional watch and repurposes them as cursors to point at different commands.

Behind the watch hands is a digital screen that displays e-ink, like on a reading tablet. The electromagnetic hands are moved by pushing the buttons on the side of the device -- the ones normally used for setting the time on an analog watch.

"Together, these components enable a unique set of interaction techniques and user interfaces beyond their individual capabilities," says the project's white paper, written by Olwal.

One use for the interface could be answering a text. In a demo video, the wearer gets a message that says, "Hey! Send me photos of your new prototypes!" Underneath the text are three options: archive, reply or delete. Pushing a button on the side of the watch moves the clock hand to point at one of the options.

The idea has been tried before. Two years ago, LG announced the Watch W7, a device that runs on Wear OS and has physical clock hands that sit on a digital screen. The device got a mostly lukewarm reception.

The lackluster LG release may be instructive for Google. It's unclear whether the search giant will ever try to commercialize something from the Interactive Lab, but whatever Google does come up with will have to be compelling enough to stand out in a crowded market. For all its flaws, Google Glass did one thing right: It got everyone's attention.

Read the rest here:

Google is quietly experimenting with holographic glasses and smart tattoos - CNET

Lawmakers on the House Oversight and Reform Committee continue applying pressure to Google and Apple, seekingat a minimumcommitments from the tech giants to be more transparent with users about the applications in their app stores.

In separate letters to Google and Apple Tuesday, Rep. Stephen Lynch, chairman of the subcommittee on national security, sought assurances that the companies would warn users about applications that are developed, operated or owned by foreign entities and could pose privacy risks to Americans.

The letters followed recent testimony from intelligence and FBI officials outlining national security risks posed by foreign-owned apps, including the ability to create backdoors into user devices and sharing user information with the government in which it resides.

As industry leaders, Apple and Google can and must do more to ensure that smartphone applications made available to U.S. citizens on their platforms protect stored data from unlawful foreign exploitation, and do not compromise U.S. national security, Lynch said in the letters. At a minimum, Apple and Google should take steps to ensure that users are aware of the potential privacy and national security risks of sharing sensitive information with applications that store data in countries adversarial to the United States, or whose developers are subsidiaries of foreign companies.

Were Apple and Google to comply, users would be warned about the potential dangers before downloading certain applications like TikTok, a popular social media app owned by Beijing-based startup ByteDance.Last month, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo floated the possibility of the U.S. government banning TikTok over its connections with China. Currently, neither Google nor Apple requires developers to provide users with information regarding where their data is storedor which country has jurisdiction over that data. The companies also do not decide what user data can be accessed by a third-party application.

In the letters, Lynch requests answers from the companies regarding whether theyll up their transparency game with users, whether theyve removed foreign-connected applications from their app stores and why, and whether they have recommendations for improving user protection from foreign-connected applications.

Original post:

House Oversight Lawmaker Wants Apple, Google to Step Up Security on Apps With Foreign Ties - Nextgov

Attorney General William Barr on Thursday said U.S. technology companies including Apple and Google have been all too willing to collaborate with Chinas Communist Party, as he tore into that countrys leaders in a fiery speech.

Speaking at the Gerald Ford Presidential Museum in Grand Rapids, Mich., Barr said that over the years, corporations such as Google GOOG, -0.00% GOOGL, +0.00%, Microsoft MSFT, -1.07%, Yahoo and Apple AAPL, -0.89% have shown themselves all too willing to collaborate with the CCP.

He listed as an example Apples removal of the Quartz news app from its app store in China, following a Chinese government complaint.

The criticism of U.S. companies came amid a broad speech on China, in which Barr said the Chinese Communist Party was seeking to make the world safe for dictatorship and accused China of waging an economic blitzkrieg against the U.S. in a bid for global dominance.

As the U.S. presidential election nears, China appears to be increasingly in U.S. crosshairs. Last week, FBI Director Chris Wray said China was trying to compromise American companies and institutions doing COVID-19 research.

President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has said he has no plans to speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping, whom he had previously described as a friend.

See the original post:

Barr blasts Apple and Google as all too willing to cooperate with China - MarketWatch

Shekhar Banerjee

Agency-client relationship will grow stronger in a post-Covid world as recovery is likely to be slower and both parties will be more dependent on each other, feels Shekhar Banerjee, Chief Client Officer and Head, West, Wavemaker India.

Call for entries open for BuzzInContent Awards 2020 ENTER NOW

Our dependence on each other will grow, recovery will be a slow process and we need to work together in two areas higher accountability for every penny spent and build bespoke solutions that solve a specific client challenge and not just requirement of advertising inventory, he told BestMediaInfo.com in an interaction.

Banerjee said the agencys role will be bigger than just planning the media.

Our clients are leaning more on us. As an agency, we are learning faster given our exposure across multiple industries. We are now consulting our clients beyond the ambit of media plans. They want us to be their trusted advisor who can positively provoke them and their current operating norms, even drive agendas that accelerate their organisations transformation.

Excerpts:

Several international brands have announced they would stay away from social media advertising. Facebook, Google and other social media giants control over 80% of digital marketing spends. How should local platforms capitalise on it and what is your assessment about the prospects of their gain?

Google and Facebook will continue to enjoy the lions share of digital adex. They have built audience capabilities and measurement frameworks that assure advertisers of their spends. Over the last three years, both platforms have built enough used cases that help us quantify the ROI. If there is anything that could chip away in future from their share it is the ecommerce marketplaces and their DSPs. So while the local platforms, including homegrown AVOD platforms, have a strong tailwind, they have a lot of catch-up to do. First, the local platforms need to shed the mindset of reservation buys and premium inventory. Advertisers are targeting audiences and it is one connected ecosystem. So local platforms will have to build a robust self-serving platform and that means sharing a lot more about their platform then they do today. They will have to stand the test of effectiveness, which means a lot of investment in AB testing and analytics and finally the right balance between effectiveness and efficiency. Market leaders are already challenging the pricing norms.

The social media giants, including Google, have created their own ecosystem, including a walled garden sort of measurement system and brands had no other option than to buy them because of their sheer reach. On the other hand, all other platforms are struggling in the absence of a unified measurement system. Will this status quo end?

This is not a simple problem of sharing information. Two things will happen in this space. One is more accountability. We are already seeing large platforms working very closely with Wavemaker and our clients to build a robust measurement and attribution process. Second, we will observe more silos. We will see more varied platforms and no unifier of data. The responsibility will lie with our client to work closely with their agencies to build a connected audience ecosystem that not only identifies but also activates.

More importantly, we dont need all the information that is behind the wall; we need the right information to maximise our clients growth. To the contrary, I have often seen information/data overload and advertisers are not able to make sense of this data crowding. At Wavemaker, we have invested before time to build these capabilities. We are today consulting and even building turnkey projects around audience management and activation. Solutions such as Ads Data Hub & BigQuery will further boost the adoption. This will not only address the issues of data privacy but also help us define causality of events and chart growth framework.

There is this sentiment in the industry that agencies, be it creative or media, have handled Covid situation better than media companies in terms of salary cuts and job losses. Doesnt the other angle hold true that media houses latched on to the opportunity for course correction more efficiently than agencies when it comes to downsizing non-performing businesses, which may benefit them in the long run?

We should remember we all are in the same storm and not the same boat. These are very tough times, top priority for every business is to manage cash flow and cut losses to the best. All brave businesses have moved fast to manage cost and run a tight ship till the storm passes. We will see a very different industry on the other side. Covid-19 will have lasting impact on the choices we will make and for that matter what our media partners deliver. We all are making tough choices between investing for the future versus non-performing.

Social media giant such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter survive on free content from Indian publishers. When the content is able to generate eyeballs, then they share some revenue with publishers, which is always opaque. IBF members such as Star, Viacom18, Zee and Sony separated long back. There is a growing sentiment that other publishers too should follow the same formula to aim big. What is stopping them to do that?

We need to break this into two different issues. First is about revenue sharing on content published. These platforms have a defined revenue sharing model. If that suits the content producer, they will use it else they will not. The choice is with the producer. Let us not forget that a lot of new-age content producers and influencers have been discovered because of these platforms. It also comes with a very low entry cost/barrier and that should also be accounted when the producer is taking the call on revenue. Second part of your question is for the already scaled and seasoned content aggregators or distributors like TV channels. For them, the choice is about retaining their audiences and build platforms for the future.

Frenemies is the word; you can but not live without each other. The boundaries of content consumption has blurred. People are consuming long-format content on mobile screens. At the same time, the number of connected TVs in the country is skyrocketing and the phenomenon is also powered by YT. So while publishers may not choose to host their content on YT or FB, they will continue to reach and engage with their audiences on these platforms. The reverse also holds true.

New normal is the buzzword these days. What will be new normal in media planning and buying post-pandemic?

New normal is now an overused buzzword. At the core, we are talking about human truths and they dont change. So we need to analyse the behaviour changes but also use caution to predict what will stay or become the new normal. As Kotler had quoted in the very first page of his marketing bible, The future is not ahead of us. It has already happened. Unfortunately, it is unequally distributed among companies, industries and nations. Good news is that we are already seeing strong signals on what trends are here to stay and what are shifting. As a global network, Wavemaker is spending disproportionate time in exchanging this knowledge between countries and all our clients. We have weekly recovery dashboards by markets and our global practice experts are synthesizing these information to build industry-specific roadmap on recovery along with choices on media. There is no one-size-fits-all recommendation on media; this is a lot of grunt work and as an expert we are helping our client to pick what is relevant and ignore the noise in the system.

What will be the new normal when it comes to client relationship for media agencies?

There are no frameworks or best practices to tide through this crisis, our clients are experiencing this more than us. Our clients are leaning more on us. As agency, we are learning faster given our exposure across multiple industries. We are now consulting our clients beyond the ambit of media plans. They want us to be their trusted advisor who can positively provoke them and their current operating norms, even drive agendas that accelerate their organisations transformation.

And what will be the new normal in the relationship of agencies with media houses?

Our dependence on each other will grow. Recovery will be a slow process and we need to work together on two areas higher accountability for every penny spent, and build bespoke solutions that solve a specific client challenge and not just requirement of advertising inventory.

Info@BestMediaInfo.com

Continue reading here:

Local platforms have a lot to catch up as Google and FB will continue to enjoy lions share, says Wavemakers Shekhar Banerjee - Best Media Info

Today's Google Doodle celebrates Dilhan Eryurt, a Turkish astrophysicist who played a huge role in the way we understand how the Sun was formed.

But who was she, what were some of her notable achievements, and why has Google chosen today to honour her?

Here's everything you need to know.

Born in 1926 in zmir - Turkey's third most populous city - Prof. Dr. Dilhan Eryurt grew up across the country, first moving to Istanbul with her family, and then on to Turkey's second city, Ankara, a few years later.

After developing an interest in mathematics in high school, Eryurt enrolled in the Istanbul University Department of Mathematics and Astronomy, and upon graduation, was assigned to open an Astronomy Department at Ankara University.

She relocated to the US to continue her graduate studies at the University of Michigan, and while there completed her doctorate at the Ankara University Department of Astrophysics, becoming Associate Professor.

From 1961, Eryurt held a position at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Centre, her appointment extra notable for the fact she was the only female astronomer working at the institution at the time.

Eryurt's work at Goddard revealed some facts about the Sun that were not yet understood.

For instance, she observed that the brightness of the Sun had not increased - it had in fact decreased - since its formation 4.5 billion years ago, revealing that our nearest star was much brighter and warmer in the past.

Her studies influenced the course of the scientific and engineering research aims of space flights - a new and uncharted territory at the time.

In 1969 she was awarded the Apollo Achievement Award for contributions to the Apollo 11 mission. Today (20 July) marks 51 years since Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins landed and walked on the moon.

Aldrin and Armstrong spent a total of 21 hours and 36 minutes on the moon, but the Apollo 11 mission itself lasted a total of eight days, three hours, 18 min, and 35 seconds.

This is likely the reason Google have chosen today to celebrate Eryurt's life; her research provided NASA engineers with crucial information for modelling solar impact on the lunar environment

She later moved on to work at the California University, where she studied the formation and development of Main Sequence stars - a continuous band of stars that appear on plots of stellar colour versus brightness.

Throughout her long and successful career, Eryurt became an award-winning astronomer, picking up all sorts of nods for her contributions and work.

Other notable achievements of hers include the organising of Turkey's first National Astronomy Congress in 1968, and the establishment of the Astrophysics Department at the Middle East Technical University.

She retired in 1993 after a long career, and sadly died in September 2012 at the age of 85, suffering a heart attack in Ankara.

See the original post:

Dilhan Eryurt: why a Google Doodle is celebrating the Turkish astrophysicist who changed how we understand the Sun - East Lothian News

True to Googles penchant for just announcing things right after theyve leaked, the company has unveiled a grand redesign of Gmail for G Suite business users ahead of next weeks Google Cloud conference. The app isnt so much Gmail anymore as it is a unified app for all of Googles communication platforms: Gmail, Chat, Rooms, and Meet.

It will be available as an early access preview to G Suite customers this week and roll out to all G Suite customers later this year. As for the consumer version of Gmail, it seems as though little will change in the short term. Google says that it is actively thinking through how and when to bring this experience to the consumers who might want it.

Javier Soltero, who rolled in to Google last November with the mission of cleaning all of this up, characterizes it as an integrated workspace that should make it easier for workers to shift between these different modes of communication without feeling lost. So, for example, someday the chat box that already appears in a Google Doc or a Google Meet window wouldnt be a random extra box, but instead be integrated with your other chats or rooms.

Right now, however, the main change is simply putting these tools into the same app (on your phone) or window (on your desktop). It should be less bouncing around between browser tabs and apps. In one example, users on the desktop will be able to get a view with a chat in one column, a doc in another, and a Google Meet video chat hovering over both.

While there are some links in Gmail right now to these other products, this is more of a wholesale integration. Its the next logical step for Google after it already pushed Google Meet into Gmail this past May.

Putting all these different communication vectors into a single app has an additional benefit: setting a Do Not Disturb status across all of them as well as muting their notifications in a single place. You will also be able to search chats as easily as you can search Gmail. Google says that these integrations enable users to quickly join a video call from a chat, forward a chat message to your inbox, [or] create a task from a chat message.

Google is also trying to make certain collaboration tasks a little easier. The distinction between Chat and Rooms, for example, is a little fuzzy until you realize Rooms are meant to be more persistent spaces to discuss projects. Google is adding lightweight versions of other G Suite products to Rooms: each will have its own areas for assigned tasks and files.

Just as Microsoft is leveraging its Office 365 dominance to get its users to adopt Teams, Google is clearly leveraging Gmails popularity to push its own collaboration tools. For G Suite customers who want to fully live inside Googles ecosystem of tools, the new integrations could make it easier to organize their shared work. For everybody else, it might end up being a set of unwanted add-ons that are increasingly hard to avoid.

The changes pivot G Suite to being primarily about Google Docs, and they pivot Sheets to being primarily about Googles collaboration tools. G Suite has a bunch of products with overlapping features: Docs, Sheets, Chat, Meet, Tasks, Keep, Drive, and Gmail all have little pieces of each other integrated, but its all too easy to get lost.

The history of these products is that they were all built individually, Soltero says, and they all had a core set of opinions that were obvious to everyone: multi-user, user collaboration, etc. ... They all had the same set of shared ideas but they were not necessarily driving toward a shared end goal.

That goal is now much clearer: make G Suites communication apps the central point and organizing principle for all those other products. Outlooks tabs are mail, search / files, and calendar. For Gmail, all the tabs are about communication tools. Its a move thats clearly directed at heading off both Microsoft Teams and Slack. Googles intent is to be at the forefront of a new definition of what a productivity suite is but those other companies are essentially doing the same thing.

See the original post here:

Gmail is integrating Google Chat, Rooms, and Meet to take on Microsoft and Slack - The Verge

07/15 Update below. This post was originally published on July 12

While Chrome has had a rocky recent run, an ambitious rival has been quick to capitalize. But now Google has given potential defectors a great reason to stick with its browser.

Google Chrome is about to get a lot faster and more efficient

Having attained internal Google documents TheWindowsClub, has revealed that Chrome is going to become dramatically more power efficient. And it looks set to result in hours of additional battery life for laptop and smartphone users.

07/14 Update: Google has announced it will be making further battery saving improvements to the Chrome browser. Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, Max Christoff, director ofChromebrowser engineering, revealed that Google is now actively focused on making the browser less power hungry with three new initiatives. These are tab throttling (detailed below) which he states will have a "dramatic impact on battery and performance", reducing the power drain of ads and new optimization changes to the core of the browser. Interestingly, Christoff spoke to the WSJ as part of a highly critical editorial from the site which attacked the performance of the browser in comparison to rivals - something I have discussed recently. If Chrome is to retain its overwhelming lead in the browser market, Google now needs to follow through on these initiatives.

07/15 Update: worrying news for Chrome users because Google has announced a U-turn over its support for 'Segment Heap, a potentially major breakthrough for memory consumption by Chromium browsers in Windows 10. "Disable the segment heap by default and add a GN flag to control it," the company commented. "Theres some concern that the cost of the Segment heap doesnt justify its cost (see crbug.com/1102281). This CL disable it by default and put this feature behind a GN flag to let us keep experimenting with it." Segment Heap creator Microsoft had tried to defend the technology, saying "More often its increased memory usage for reduced CPU usage. In this case its increased CPU usage for dramatically reduced memory usage" but Google hasn't bought into the trade-off. This is bad news for millions of Chrome users on Windows 10 because it was seen as the best way for Chrome to reduce its infamous RAM consumption on the platform. Google has not given up on Segment Heap completely, but it looks like we will all be waiting a lot longer than expected for Chrome to become more memory efficient on Windows 10.

TheWindowsClub explains that Google will achieve this by throttling the use of non-essential Javascript tasks in background tabs. These tasks include things like reporting logs, ad interactions, monitoring scroll position and more and Google has discovered they are a major source of battery drain. In a test attained by TheWindowsClub, Google limited Javascript checks to once per minute and opened 36 tabs in the background. The result was a 28% boost to battery life resulting in another two hours of usage (graph below).

Google Chrome testing shows dramatically improved battery life with the new Javascript changes

In a second test, Google also found that even when running an intensive process in a foreground tab (in this case YouTube videos), limiting Javascript checks in background tabs still resulted in a 13% battery increase. Moreover, this isnt something for the far flung future. TheWindowsClub found this feature is already available to test thanks to a hidden setting in Chrome Canary. Heres how Chrome Canary users can enable it now:

While Chromium based browsers will receive the same functionality, the key for Google is to keep Chrome itself as lean as possible, given the rise of more privacy focused and ad hostile Chromium browsers like Brave and Vivaldi.

Interestingly. Microsoft recently gave Chrome a helping hand here with its new Segment Heap memory optimization software, introduced in the Windows 10 May 2020 update. Early tests show this could reduce Chromes infamous memory consumption by up to a third. In return, Google has piled the pressure on Windows by announcing its ambitious plan to run Windows programs (including Office) natively on Chrome OS.

The browser wars are back.

___

Follow Gordon on Facebook

More On Forbes

Googles New Tab Groups Reinvigorate Chrome Browser

Google Gmail Users Hit By Deleted And Lost Email

Read more:

Google Just Gave Millions Of Users A Reason To Keep Chrome - Forbes

Google has become the latest high-profile firm to back Indias Reliance Jio Platforms. The search giant is investing $4.5 billion for a 7.73% stake in the top Indian telecom network, Reliance Industries chairman Mukesh Ambani said on Wednesday.

The investment today from Google is one of the rare instances when the Android-maker has joined its global rival Facebook in backing a firm. Facebook invested $5.7 billion in Reliance Jio Platforms, which has amassed more than 400 million subscribers in less than four years of its existence, in April this year for a 9.99% stake in it. Facebook is the largest minority stakeholder in Jio Platforms.

Jio Platforms, a subsidiary of Reliance Industries (Indias most valued firm) has raised about $20.2 billion in the past four months from 13 investors by selling about 33% stake in the firm. (For some context, the entire Indian startup ecosystem raised $14.5 billion last year.)

Googles new investment gives Jio Platforms an equity valuation of $58 billion the same valuation implied by Facebook. Other investors, including General Atlantic, Silver Lake, Qualcomm, Intel and Vista, have paid a 12.5% premium for their stake in Jio Platforms.

As part of Wednesdays strategic announcement, Google and Reliance Jio Platforms will work on a customized-version of Android operating system to develop low-cost, entry-level smartphones to serve the next hundreds of millions of users, said Ambani. These phones will support Google Play and future wireless standard 5G, he said.

Getting technology into the hands of more people is a big part of Googles mission, said Sundar Pichai, chief executive at Google, via a video chat on Wednesday. Together we are excited to rethink, from the ground up, how millions of users in India can become owners of smartphones. This effort will unlock new opportunities, further power the vibrant ecosystem of applications and push innovation to drive growth for the new Indian economy, he said.

The new deal further illustrates the opportunities foreign investors see in Jio Platforms that has upended the telecommunications market in India with cut-rate voice calls and mobile data tariffs. This is not the first time Jio Platforms has expressed interest in mobile operating system or handsets. The company has shipped at least 40 million JioPhone powered by KaiOS. These smart feature phones support a handful of apps, including Facebooks WhatsApp. Google is an investor in KaiOS eponymous developer.

Analysts at Bernstein said last month that they expect Jio Platforms which competes with Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, a joint venture between British giant Vodafone and Indian tycoon Kumar Mangalam Birlas Aditya Birla Group, in India to reach 500 million customers by 2023, and control half of the market by 2025.

Google, which like Facebook reaches nearly every online user in India, announced a new fund on Monday through which it said it plans to invest $10 billion in Asias third largest economy over the next five to seven years. Its investment in Jio Platforms today is the first investment from the Google For India Digitization Fund.

Jio Platforms also operates a range of digital services, including a music streaming player and a video conferencing app. On Wednesday, Jio Platforms unveiled its newest offering: the Jio Glass.

Jio Platforms executives said Jio Glass wearers will be able to perform video calls and access more than two dozen apps. They did not disclose when Jio Platforms plans to make this new gadget available to consumers and what it would cost. Jio Platforms has unveiled devices in the past that sometimes take years to reach consumers and sometimes they are quietly abandoned. Jio unveiled a similar pair of spectacles last year.

Image Credits: Jio Platforms via YouTube

Some investors have told TechCrunch in recent months that Reliance Jio Platforms owner Indias richest man, Mukesh Ambani and his closeness to the ruling political party in India are also crucial to why the digital unit of Reliance Industries is so attractive to many.

They believe that buying a stake in Jio Platforms would lower the regulatory burden they and their portfolio firms currently face in India. The investors requested anonymity as they did not wish to talk about the political tie-ups publicly.

A person familiar with the matter at one of the 13 firms that has backed Reliance Jio Platforms said that the Indian firm is also enticing as globally companies are trying to cut down their reliance and exposure on China.

India, and the U.S., in recent months have taken actions to limit their reliance on Chinese firms. New Delhi last month banned 59 apps and services including TikTok that are developed by Chinese firms. Reliance Jio Platforms has interestingly yet to raise capital from any Chinese investor.

Jio, for its part, has made an extraordinary contribution to Indias technological progress over the past decade. Its investments to expand telecommunications infrastructure, low-cost phones and affordable internet have changed the way its hundreds of millions of subscribers find news and information, communicate with one another, use services and run businesses. Today, Jio is increasing its focus on the development of areas like digital services, education, healthcare and entertainment that can support economic growth and social inclusion at a critical time in the countrys history, said Pichai.

Reliance Industries, whose core businesses are in petrochemicals, has said in recent months that it plans to list Jio Platforms and Reliance Retail, another subsidiary of the firm, within five years. Its a big week for firms in India. On Tuesday, Walmart led a $1.2 billion financing round in Flipkartto increase its majority stake in the 13-year-old Indian e-commerce firm.

Link:

Google invests $4.5 billion in Indias Reliance Jio Platforms - TechCrunch

Presentations and classes without gatecrashers are promised with the latest Google Meet upgrade.

Google Meet has just announced an update which will mean that Zoombombing is history. Its been confirmed that it will be rolled out to G Suite for Education customers and was announced in the G Suite Updates blog and picked up by Damien Wilde at 9to5Google.

Zoombombing, youll know, is that phenomenon which first appeared early in the Covid-19 pandemic and wreaked havoc for a while. It happened because Zoom, in the early days at least, had a somewhat relaxed relationship with security. This meant that strangers with frankly very little information, were able to gatecrash video calls. The results were that pranksters or those with more sinister intent could burst into private meetings. Though some of these crashes were surprising and comical, others were more serious and had ramifications such as causing a meeting to end or delivering inappropriate content to schoolchildren, say.

Its significant that Google has focused todays announcement on its education users, since lessons were definitely heavily impacted by Zoombombing.

More features are coming to Google Meet as it tries to take on Zoom and Teams.

However, the fact that its coming to education customers and has been announced on the education blog does not indicate it will stay only there. Plenty of other Google Meet features which were announced first for education, arrived for other users soon after.

Google points out that anonymous users can be very disruptive, being distracting or worse by sharing content, making noise and so on.

So this upgrade uses a simple mechanism which will make a big difference. Heres how Google described the change:

To increase the privacy of education meetings in Google Meet, anonymous users (users not signed into a Google account) can no longer join meetings organized by anyone with a G Suite for Education or G Suite Enterprise for Education license. This prevents participants from sharing a link publicly to encourage anonymous users to request access.

If youre not invited, youre not coming in. The new security settings will be put in place by default, which means there are no extra things for an administrator to do, though they can be removed if a customer contacts G Suite Support.

The new feature is being rolled out gradually, over the next 15 days, beginning from July 13, 2020. Initially its just for G Suite for Education and G Suite Enterprise for Education customers, but check back for more details when every Google Meet customer is protected from unwelcome gatecrashing.

Follow me on Instagram by clicking here: davidphelantech and Twitter: @davidphelan2009

More on Forbes:

Excerpt from:

Google Meet Upgrade Aims To Make Zoombombing A Thing Of The Past - Forbes