BOSTON Three individuals have been indicted on charges related to extortion, witness intimidation, and illegal bookmaking, Attorney General Maura Healey announced today.

The charges are the result of a long-term, multi-year investigation by the AGs Gaming Enforcement Division and the Massachusetts State Police Special Service Section (SSS) working in cooperation with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) into illegal bookmaking, loan sharking, money laundering, and organized crime.

Three defendants were indicted by a Statewide Grand Jury on the following charges:

Eric Rogers, age 54, of Revere

Extortion (3 counts)

Conspiracy to Commit Extortion (1 count)

Witness Intimidation (1 count)

Use of a Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Conspiracy to Use Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Michael McMahon, age 44, of Boston

Extortion (1 count)

Conspiracy to Commit Extortion (1 count)

Organizing and Promoting Illegal Gaming (1 count)

Criminal Usury (1 count)

Money Laundering (1 count)

Registering Bets (1 count)

Conspiracy to Register Bets (1 count)

Use of a Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Conspiracy to Use Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Brian Kelley, age 50, of Duxbury

Money Laundering (1 count)

Registering Bets (1 count)

Conspiracy to Register Bets (1 count)

Use of a Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Conspiracy to Use Telephone for Gaming (1 count)

Rogers was arrested and arraigned on the charges in Suffolk Superior Court earlier today. Rogers was held on $75,000 cash bail with the following conditions for release: he surrender his passport, be monitored via GPS with a 6pm- 6am curfew, and stay away from victims and witnesses. McMahon and Kelley will be arraigned in Suffolk Superior Court at a later date.

The AGs Office alleges that from 2017 to 2019, McMahon ran a large-scale illegal bookmaking enterprise that generated between $1 million to $2 million annually. All bets were placed through a website run by an offshore gaming company based in Costa Rica. The AGs Office alleges that Kelley was an employee of the gaming company who collected cash payments from illegal bookmakers, including McMahon, then delivered large bundles of U.S. currency in person via flights to Costa Rica as part of an elaborate money laundering scheme. Kelley is alleged to have earned significant income from this illegal scheme, which he then laundered through various residential properties. McMahon is alleged to have made more than $234,000 in cash payments to Kelley over a 20-month period.

The AGs Office alleges that Rogers collected two extortion payments of $10,000 in 2019 from McMahon in exchange for the right to operate an illegal book with permission from a larger, organized criminal syndicate.

The AGs Office further alleges that Rogers and McMahon extorted vast sums of U.S. currency from a bettor under McMahons illegal bookmaking enterprise who initially refused to pay a debt, threatening violence, and using Rogers reputation as an organized crime associate to force payment from the victim.

All of these charges are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The AGs investigation remains ongoing.

AG Healeys Gaming Enforcement Division has a dedicated group of prosecutors and investigators who enforce the states Expanded Gaming Act of 2011 and investigate and prosecute illegal activity such as organized crime, money laundering, gaming-related financial crime, and corruption.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Kevin P. McCarthy and Deputy Division Chief Stephen Carley of AG Healeys Gaming Enforcement Division, with the assistance of the AGs Digital Evidence Laboratory, including forensic Digital Media Analyst Jobal Thomas and Laura Hernandez, and the Massachusetts State Polices Fusion Center. Financial Investigation was conducted by Senior Financial Investigator Eugene Griffin of AG Healeys Gaming Enforcement Division.

###

Here is the original post:

Three Men Charged in Connection With Illegal Gambling and Extortion Scheme - Mass.gov

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off

How Cryptocurrency Casinos Are Shaping the Future of Gambling – Novinite.com

Posted: at 9:46 am

Gambling has evolved through the years. It grew from local bets among friends and neighbors to large-scale casino bets. We now have online gambling, which is also evolving with every Fintech improvement.

Online gambling has grown with every eCommerce transition. We moved from making cash payments at casino cash offices and bank tellers to making eWallet transactions through mobile banking and other online financial institutions. The world has moved to cryptocurrencies and other decentralized payment options. It is only natural that online gambling moves with this decentralized trend. Let's explore crypto casinos and how they would change future gambling systems.

Bitcoin Casinos like those found on cryptocasinos.net are online casinos that accept Bitcoin as their primary exchange currency. Bitcoin is the leading digital currency and the front-runner in decentralized transactions. It is not exactly surprising that it has become a popular exchange tender in online gambling.

Online casinos thrive on the convenience they provide their users compared to traditional casino setups. Where land-based casinos suffer from general challenges like geographical restrictions and payment limitations, online gambling is an effective way to avoid these challenges. However, Crypto casinos provide even more convenience than regular online casinos.

Bitcoin casinos paved the way for other crypto payments when Cloubdbet Casino debuted in 2013. Of course, it felt like a fool's errand and barely gained much traction in the first few years. Bitcoin as a payment method had similar challenges until it started to thrive in 2018. Recently, Bitcoin has been the popular payment option, and several land-based casinos have included Bitcoin in their payment method.

Cryptocurrency has taken root in our financial system, and despite its fluctuating value, it is one of the valuable payment options. Similarly, crypto casinos offer better benefits for the online gambler, and we will consider some of them below:

Registering in Crypto casinos is like registering with regular online casinos. The only distinction is that Crypto is a decentralized payment system and imposes lesser registration requirements than other online casinos. Here is a general way to sign up:

Select your preferred crypto casino by typing in their website address or downloading their mobile app.

The first screen should contain login and sign-up options. As a new player, your choice would be to sign up. But you can select login if you have a previous account with the gambling operator.

The registration screen contains a list of sign-in requirements. While Crypto casinos do not request much personal information, they need basic details before admitting a new player. Cryptocurrency casinos only request the player's name, email address, and password. Most casinos even let you register with a Username, email address, and password.

New players can start playing after this essential registration. However, the player needs to provide further details and verify their email address before they can withdraw their winnings.

Payment methods are essential in the casino setup. Most casinos enjoy huge patronage because their fast payout rate matches their other benefits like extensive game collection and enticing promotion. Cryptocurrency casinos provide these benefits, but their payment systems offer more ease than regular online casinos.

Crypto transactions run on a decentralized system involving multiple computers creating firewalls and seamless connections simultaneously. This interconnectivity makes crypto transactions faster than fiat payments.

Bitcoin casinos gained recognition for this fast payment and seamless payment. Their customers could complete their deposits in quick time, which was an improvement from the position with fiat payments. Crypto casino customers can make deposits from their crypto wallets like Binance or Tron Wallet, and their gaming wallets would reflect the transaction immediately. This speedy deposit was common with other online payment structures, but none of them could match the withdrawal speed.

Withdrawal to crypto wallets never exceeds 24 hours unless they have some technical challenges or errors. Some casinos have verified and endorsed crypto payments in less than 6 hours which is unlikely with fiat transactions.

Crypto Casino bonuses are like other traditional gaming bonuses. However, cryptocurrency casinos offer more bonus rates than other casinos. Crypto casinos provide regular welcome and reload bonuses. You can have Free Spins and bonus credits.

Most casinos offer their players sticky bonuses with strict wagering requirements. The bonus might be a 50% welcome bonus with 20x wagering requirements. Crypto Casinos offer similar bonuses and wagering requirements but with better rates. New players may receive up to 100% or 500% welcome bonuses at the same wagering requirements but also include betting credits and Free Spins. These unique bonuses make crypto casinos more rewarding than traditional casino operators.

Crypto casinos may run on different payment systems from traditional casinos, but they are similar in their features and interfaces. Most online casinos offer identical game ranges, including slot titles, poker, blackjack, and other table games. Standard promotions include VIP Status, welcome bonuses, and reload bonuses, but crypto casinos offer better options.

Crypto casinos include regular game options but also add some exclusive games. These exclusive games are Provably Fair games that only crypto casinos can provide. The games could be unique options like Crypto Dice that differ from BlackJack, Bacarrat, or Roulette.

The decentralized nature of Cryptocurrency casinos makes them a welcoming hub for gamblers worldwide. Bitcoin casinos are particularly enticing to players in locations with strict gambling restrictions. Local regulations often regulate access to gambling activities within their borders, which could become a challenge where the Legislation limits online casino activities. This local legislation usually applies to all casinos, but Crypto Casinos operate under fewer restrictions than their traditional counterparts.

However, even decentralized casinos may face stringent regulations. These regulations would require the casino to maintain local requirements, including geographical limitations, responsible gaming guidelines, and compliance with KYC requirements.

The Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements in most countries create structures for the Casinos to verify and identify their customer. The process only requires the player to provide their government-issued identification to verify basic details like their name, age, and address. The player can complete this process by uploading images of documents like their Drivers Licences and Utility bills.

Crypto casinos offer most of the convenience that punters want from their casinos. They also play vital roles in the transition to the next gambling evolution-Metaverse Gambling. These features do not mean that cryptocurrency casinos offer the ultimate gambling experience, but they are enough to usher us into what is to come.

See original here:

How Cryptocurrency Casinos Are Shaping the Future of Gambling - Novinite.com

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off

How New Jersey Will Double Down On Gambling If Casinos Come To New York City – Forbes

Posted: at 9:46 am

Bad Luck: With New York City allowing licenses for up to three casinos, Atlantic Citys monopoly on them in New Jersey could end.

If the handful of billionaires, real estate developers and gambling companies get their way and bring a Las Vegas-style casino resort to New York City, then New Jersey can expect to lose big. With Atlantic City more than two hours from Manhattan, millions in potential tax revenue will end up going to the Empire State and not the Garden State.

A lot of money is at stake, says Jeff Gural, the real estate and casino entrepreneur who has a 25% stake in the Meadowlands Racetrack in East Rutherford, New Jersey, just outside of Manhattan. It doesnt make any sense to have all this revenue going to New York.

Gural, who also owns upstate New York casino Tioga Downs and a racinoa horse racetrack with video slotsin Vernon, was a big player in the push to bring a casino to his Meadowlands facility six years ago. Since 1977, New Jersey law only allows casinos in Atlantic City, but in 2016 a ballot measure put to voters that would have ended ACs monopoly was overwhelmingly rejected by a margin of 77% to 23%.

Gural and his supporters spent $10 million during the effort, while the opposition spent around $30 million. Now, he says, as New York prepares to license up to three casinos in the New York City area there will be enough economic incentive to get a ballot measure in front of voters again.

I'm waiting and biding my time to see New York get up and running and what the reaction is from the people from northern New Jersey, he says. Id be very surprised if there isnt a casino in the Meadowlands in a couple of years.

New Jersey has a lot to lose. Despite Atlantic Citys ongoing troubles, the casinos are still relative goldmines for the state. The resort town generates nearly 20% of its tourism dollars, according to the Casino Association of New Jersey. Every year, casinos pay $500 million in wages to employees, and last year, New Jerseys casinos, sportsbooks, internet gaming apps and racetracks paid $486 million in taxes, a 44% increase over 2020.

To get a sense of how a Manhattan casino might siphon gambling revenue away from the Garden State, look no further than mobile sports betting. In February, a month after New York launched mobile wagering on sports, New Jerseys sports betting revenue was an anemic $31 million, a 33% drop compared to February 2021. Through August, year-to-date sports betting revenues in New Jersey have seen double-digit declines.

Theres a spot-on chance that New Jersey will allow at least one casino upstate to protect its tax revenue, says gaming lobbyist Bill Pascrell IIIor else Atlantic Citys gonna sink.

Bill Pascrell III, a partner at Princeton Public Affairs Group, a New Jersey-based lobbying firm focused on gaming, says theres a spot-on chance that New Jersey will allow at least one casino upstate to protect its tax revenue. He thinks when New York opens its downstate casinos, there will be enough economic leverage to convince voters and stakeholders that a casino in North Jersey is necessary, or else Atlantic City's gonna sink.

Pascrell believes theres enough political and voter support to get a new ballot measure passed. He claims that New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy supports the idea, but the Governors office would not comment when asked if he supports a ballot measure to allow for casinos outside of Atlantic City.

Dennis Drazin, the chairman and CEO of Monmouth Park racetrack in Oceanport, New Jerseyabout an hour south of New York Citysays that nothing would make him happier than opening a casino on his grounds. Caesars already operates a sportsbook on the first floor of the Monmouth Grandstand, Drazin notes, so it would be a natural extension to add slots and table games. He also believes that New Jersey has no other choice. It represents a significant risk to Jersey if New York opens, he says, and we dont do something to respond to make sure the business stays here.

Meanwhile, the casinos in Atlantic City say they arent scared of New York. Mark Giannantonio, the president and CEO of Resorts Casino Hotel on The Boardwalk, doesnt think adding more casinos in North Jersey is the answer.

While New York downstate casinos will add more competition, says Giannantonio, who is also the president of the Casino Association of New Jersey, it is essential for all New Jersey stakeholders to focus our efforts on the ongoing revitalization of Atlantic City into a top destination resort in the country.

New Jersey State Sen. Vincent Polistina, a Republican who represents Atlantic City, believes there is no reason to consider allowing casinos outside of his district. The state should not even hold discussions regarding North Jersey casinos right now, Polistina says. We have challenges in Atlantic City that we must address with a renewed commitment to reinvestment and redevelopment over the next few years in order to deal with increased competition from New York.

Yet, newcomers to Atlantic City see a future outside the seaside citys borders. Soo Kim, the founder of New York-based hedge fund Standard General, which owns a 22% stake in Ballys, says a big part of his firms bet when it bought the Ballys casino hotel in Atlantic City for $25 million in 2020 has nothing to do with the South Jersey casino town.

This is a play beyond just Atlantic City, Kim told Forbes. AC is going to have challenges. Its already a challenging market with the additional casino that opened in Philly and with New York opening, its going to be hurting even further.

Kim thinks the natural solution is for New Jersey to allow for a casino in the Meadowlands, which he affectionately refers to as the swamp.

Even though Hard Rock International is applying for a casino license in New York City, chairman Jim Allen told the Associated Press that it is still eyeing New Jersey. Back in 2013, Hard Rock bought a stake in Gurals Meadowlands racetrack and in 2015 the company proposed a plan to bring a casino to the thoroughbred site just across the Hudson River from Manhattan.

Im not saying we would drop a Meadowlands option, Allen told the AP in February. Theres certainly the ability to have more than one product in a geographic area, as weve done many times in our industry.

Even though a casino in North Jersey could be a great defense against New York, Colin Mansfield, an analyst at Fitch Ratings, says the ballot measure loss in 2016 will make a revived effort to pass a new measure a long, bitter fight.

At the end of the day, that casino will still cannibalize Atlantic City, says Mansfield. It depends on who owns that casino and how much ultimately is siphoned away from Atlantic City. Its very, very complex question.

See original here:

How New Jersey Will Double Down On Gambling If Casinos Come To New York City - Forbes

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off

The history of gambling in California: Props 26 and 27 explained – CBS News 8

Posted: at 9:46 am

If sports betting is legalized in California, who should operate it? Californians have answered a similar question in the past.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. There are seven propositions on the November ballot. Propositions 26 and 27 are making history, as more than $450 million have been poured into campaigns for and against them so far.

Native American tribes are battling gambling companies for control over what could be another multi-billion dollar industry, but ads for and against the propositions are bringing up other questions.

To look at what could be in store, we're also looking at the past.

HISTORY

From donations to the fire station, to a community health clinic on the way, It's hard to ignore the benefits the town ofEspartoin Yolo County has enjoyed since the neighboringYocha Dehe Wintun Nationimplemented gambling in the 1980s.

A stark contrast to what Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Chairman Anthony Roberts said life was like growing up.

"it was just tough," Chairman Roberts said. "Tribes living in poverty struggling to make ends meet, not knowing where our next meal was going to come from."

The tribe, which runs theCache Creek Casino and Resort is now flooded with cash.

"So specific numbers we don't normally talk about, but I will say that gaming has helped our tribe tremendously," Chairman Roberts said.

Sixty-year California Veteran Journalist Dan Walters, who has covered the history of casinos in the state, says that combined, casino tribes make billions.

"They make a lot of money on their casinos, a lot of money," Walters said. "Billions and billions of dollars a year."

Dozens of tribes are supporting Proposition 26 to legalize in-person sports betting at tribal casinos, but first, let's rewind.

How did California get to the point where tribes operate casinos?

In 1987 aCalifornia tribe won a U.S supreme court case. If the state allows any sort of gambling, at the time bingo parlors, the tribes were allowed to have it on their land too.

"They made money and they built better facilities," Walters said. "Within a few years, they were kind of expanding the definition of the court's permission and started putting in a form of slot machine."

Walters reported on the efforts of the California attorney general at the time, who was trying to shut the casinos down.

"State authorities said they were illegal, but they fought over it, and the tribes continued to have slot machines and finally made enough money on the slots to finance some ballot measures in California that gave them a monopoly over almost full casino gambling in California," Walters explained.

In 2000, California voters overwhelmingly supportedProposition 1 to permit tribes to operate slot machines, lottery games, and bank and percentage card games like blackjack.

"For the better part of two decades (California voters) have supported tribal gaming here in California on our lands," Chairman Anthony Roberts said. "That's given us the opportunity to become economically viable to provide health care and education."

PRESENT

Fast forward 22 years, and now Californians are presented with a similar gambling question:If sports wagering should become legal in California, who should operate it?

"There are a number of ways that ours are better," Nathan Click said.

Nathan Click is running the "Yes on Proposition 27" campaign, which will legalize online sports betting run through large corporations likeDraftKingsandFanDuel. It also creates a pathway to legalize online betting on non-sporting events like award shows and video games.

Why is Prop 27 being promoted by supporters as a way to fight homelessness?

"Prop 27 would, for the first time in state history, create a permanent source of funding for homelessness interventions," Click said. "These are things like permanent supportive housing, tiny homes, mental health and addiction treatment that gets folks off the streets.

They've added in what experts call sweeteners, some funding for homelessness, and they partnered with three non-gaming tribes that don't enjoy the same financial benefits that tribes with casinos do.

"It's it's a common thing when people draft ballot measures they have what they really want, and then they throw in a few goodies on the side so that people would be more willing to vote for it," Walters said, "It goes back to think of the lottery initially back in the 80s. The lottery was sold to the voters on the assumption that quote 'the schools win too' because some of the money from the lottery would go to the schools."

HOMELESSNESS

So, how much money is Proposition 27 promising to provide to homelessness? Authors of the proposition titled it "The Homelessness and Mental Health Support Act."

Ninety percent of revenue goes out of state to the large corporations and three non-gaming tribes.

After taking out money for fees, what's left of the remaining 10%, 85% of that is designated for homeless funding.

Percentage-wise, it's not much, but a small percentage of a large amount is still a lot of money. The independent Legislative Analysts Office predicts it will bring in hundreds of millions a year for homelessness.

The state of California however, has already put billions toward solving the homeless crisis.

So what's different about this money?

"The state has spent some one-time money, but that's only one-time money," Click said. "We haven't had a permanent ongoing funding source, and that's a revenue stream that will help cities and counties plan for the long term."

PROBLEM GAMBLING

Critics of Proposition 27 have pointed to the issue of problem gambling. As of right now, 3.7 million Californians experience problem gambling in their lifetime.

"Gambling actually does create a high, it creates a dopamine high," California Council on Problem GamblingDirector Robert Jacobson said. "It doesn't create a high that's going to result in you, for example, passing out. If you're drinking, eventually you pass out, but people who gamble can do it for days at a time."

The California Council on Problem Gambling is neutral when it comes to gambling propositions.

Gambling has become a massive part of our culture, and I think the conversation of if gambling should exist if it shouldn't exist, that conversation happened 20 years ago," Jacobson said.

What they do give input on is if propositions will provide funding to help treat addiction that will arise from them if passed.

"Proposition 26 currently includes dedicated funding for problem gambling services, proposition 27 does not," Jacobson said.

Proposition 27 does allow the state legislature to decide if they want to allocate money towards problem gambling, but Jacobson fears they won't.

"Because the recurring theme that's going to come through our conversation, is that not enough research exists," Jacobson said.

Chairman Anthony Roberts believes his tribe can handle the problem.

"Tribes have been doing this for a better part of two decades," Chairman Roberts said. "They already have their policies and regulations in place to combat problem gambling and underage gambling."

UNDERAGE GAMBLING

Let's talk about underage gambling. One ad against Prop 27 claims the proposition, which turns every digital device into a sports wagering tool, won't be able to control minors from placing bets.

The "Yes on Proposition 27" campaign disagrees.

"Twenty-seven has the strictest rules to ensure that those who place bets are over the age of 18," Click said.

More than 30 states legalized online sports betting since a2018 Supreme Court case allowed them to do so.

"The more widespread the marketing for that online gambling and the more exposure that people have to that marketing, ultimately, the higher the prevalence rates become, and the speed with which addictions develop and the severity with which addictions develop," Robert Jacobson said.

If Proposition 26 is passed, in addition to legalizing sports betting in casinos on Native American land, it includes four horse tracks in the state.

HORSE TRACKS

"Why the horse tracks? Well, by including it, it didn't really cost the tribes anything," Walters said. "It kind of eliminated some potential opposition. The cardroom people still didn't like it because Proposition 26 has a poison pill clause in it that subjects the cardrooms to some legal harassment that they otherwise would not have."

In other words, it helps eliminate opposition, creating more of a monopoly.

"The measure also, they don't talk about it very much, also legalizes other games in Indian casinos, such as roulette," Walters explained.

PROP 26

Pro 26 tribes fear they will lose revenue if 27 passes.

"We feel like this would be a huge infringement on our brick and mortars," Chairman Roberts said.

Walters, however, said 85 to 90% of the revenue they currently make is from slot machines. People enjoy the physical aspect of pulling the lever or pushing the button.

"It's almost the whole game," Walters said.

Walters said it's a separate, younger, male base that will generate revenue for online sports betting or in-person.

The question should be,who will get billions on top of the billions they are already making?

In aSacramento Press Clubdebate with both Proposition 26 and 27 campaigns, Kathy Fairbanks with proposition 26 said that some of the tribes who are backing the in-person-only initiative this year are also backing an initiative in 2024 for online sports wagering, but run through the tribes instead of large out-of-state operators

"Mobile sports betting is something that people want," Fairbanks said. "Again, we want to start slowly and responsibly."

Nathan Click called it hypocritical.

"They say it's unsafe now, but in 2024, in just two years when it's their initiative, they'll be totally fine with it," Click said. "That's obviously incredibly hypocritical and shows exactly why they're opposing our initiative."

VOTING

People can vote yes on both prepositions.

"To the extent that they're in conflict with each other, the one that has the most votes will prevail," Walters said. "There will probably be some court battles."

You can vote no on both, or yes on one of them and no on the other.

"t's not going to go away," Walters said. "If both of these measures are defeated, I think we'll be back in 2024 ballot with at least one more measure"

So gear up for billboards, TV, and radio advertisements. These campaigns have already outspent every other initiative in California history because the win is worth the bet.

POLLS

The most recent polls out from Berkeley show that neither of the propositions is doing well right now among voters.

For Proposition 27 (online), voters put no 53% of the time and yes 27% of the time.

For Proposition 26 (in person), voters put no 42% of the time and yes 31% of the time.

In an event in Las Vegas last week, theLas Vegas Review Journal said representatives of both the tribes and Fan Fuel and Draft King admitted their propositions would likely fail.

Fan Duel and Draft King reps say confusion over the two initiatives and the fact that a majority of the tribes oppose the online measure in its current form would likely lead to defeat.

WATCH RELATED: Ballots hit mailboxes across the state for the November election (Oct. 2022).

Read this article:

The history of gambling in California: Props 26 and 27 explained - CBS News 8

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off

Page 24«..10 20..232425 26..30 40..»

Category Archives: Gambling

Parents should talk to their kids about the dangers of online gambling, advises Michigan board – MLive.com

Governor likely to give assent to Bill against online gambling after getting doubts cleared – The Hindu

Gamblings Spread – The New York Times

The World Cup is Giving the Gambling Industry Its a Historic Moment. But a Flood of Social … – Latest – LatestLY

Cuban Player Yasiel Puig Will Plead Guilty To Lying To Federal Agents In Illegal Gambling Case – Forbes

"This had nothing to do with gambling" – Trainwreckstv slams Twitch for gambling ban; says it was targeted at him – Sportskeeda

Three Men Charged in Connection With Illegal Gambling and Extortion Scheme – Mass.gov

How Cryptocurrency Casinos Are Shaping the Future of Gambling – Novinite.com

How New Jersey Will Double Down On Gambling If Casinos Come To New York City – Forbes

The history of gambling in California: Props 26 and 27 explained – CBS News 8

The Prometheus League

Breaking News and Updates

Prometheism

Forbidden Fruit

The Evolutionary Perspective

Transtopia Menu

Library Updates

Library Books

Future Euvolution

Lucid Dreams from Childhood

Genetic Revolution

Speciation + Self-Directed Evolution