Category Archives: Freedom of Speech

Dangerman - Freedom Of Speech
Rainbow Sounds RS 001 Darker Shade Of Black Jah Send Mi Come Michael Danger.

By: ElTchoTcho

Go here to see the original:
Dangerman - Freedom Of Speech - Video

Freedom of speech and expression is very important for a healthy, civilized society. Its how most technological and artistic innovation takes place. A healthy debate or discussion between members of a society is the most efficient way to solve problems. It is how the classical societies in Greece and Rome came up with the most influential pieces of literature that we still study today. Without this right, many ideas, beliefs and inventions would not exist, leaving the majority of the society living in ignorance.

It is considered a basic human right by the U.N. charter and is the basis of functioning democracies. In addition to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, many state constitutions and state and federal laws protect freedom of speech. One of the major reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union was the build-up of anger over years because ordinary citizens couldnt express themselves. Its a classic example of societal breakdown because dissenting opinions were suppressed.

However, I have noticed that people become increasingly agitated upon hearing opinions that they consider too dumb or too ignorant, and the discussion quickly descends to insults, comebacks, accusations, unfair comparisons and hyperbole.

This is especially true on the Internet. We have to understand that just because somebody has a differing opinion, that is not an indicator of their intelligence or a marker of how much respect they deserve.

Australian actor Leo McKern said, It is easy to believe in freedom of speech for those with whom we agree. It does not cast doubt over ones status or ability to serve as productive as a member of society. Rather, it shows their willingness to contribute to our society in the way they think best and that is commendable. Insulting someone for an opinion that they hold casts doubt over our faith in democracy and ability to tolerate other people and different opinions.

I love living in a society where people are allowed to express their opinions regardless of how politically incorrect they may be. Regardless of who you are, every human deserves a degree of respect. Disagreements do not necessarily have to result in disputes. We are bonded not by our faiths, our race or our political opinion, but by the air we breathe, the water we drink, the planet we all share and a common desire to better our lives and to secure a bright future. Every other difference is trivial and every other disagreement must be solved, for our future is tied to one other.

Read more:
Freedom of speech means tolerating opposing viewpoints

Freedom of Speech: Theories and Foundations
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Univ. of California-Irvine School of Law; Professor Frederick Schauer, University of Virginia School of Law; Professor Alexander Tses...

By: EmorySchoolofLaw

Read the original:

Freedom of Speech: Theories and Foundations - Video

Teen Fined 200 Dollars For Cursing Near Playground In Michigan 1st Amendment Freedom Of Speech
please like ,share,comments to my videos,if you wanna latest news then click on subscribed button.

By: bilster on

Read the original post:

Teen Fined 200 Dollars For Cursing Near Playground In Michigan 1st Amendment Freedom Of Speech - Video

CPDP 2015: Online privacy versus freedom of speech. Balancing rights in the EU context.
Organised by Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL) Chair: Arno Lodder, SOLV Advocaten (NL) Moderator: Tijmen Wisman, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL) Panel: Mag...

By: CPDPConferences

See the original post:

CPDP 2015: Online privacy versus freedom of speech. Balancing rights in the EU context. - Video

The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has adopted rules on internet governance to support net neutrality and the open internet, and protect freedom of expression and innovation.

The term net neutrality refers to the idea that all packets of data moving around the internet should be treated exactly the same.

Some internet service providers (ISPs) want to have the power to charge internet companies and users based on how much usage they make of the underlying network infrastructure.

Net neutrality advocates fear that, if this were allowed, it would lead to the creation of a two-tier internet where data traffic flows are controlled and regulated based on ones ability to pay.

They believe this will stifle innovation, start-up culture and, most importantly, freedom of speech and expression.

The close three to two FCC vote came weeks after commission head Tom Wheeler U-turned and set out new proposals. Wheeler spoke in favour of net neutrality, saying: The internet must be fast, fair and open.

It comes after a surge in public interest in net neutrality in the US four million people participated in the consultation and a wave of protest by high-profile internet-based firms, including Twitter and Netflix.

The FCC said it had long been committed to protecting and promoting net neutrality, but previous attempts to implement regulation had been struck down by the courts.

At the core of the FCCs ruling the Open Internet Order is one simple change; the reclassification of broadband internet access as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act.

This means the internet will now be afforded the same protections that have historically ensured telephone networks remain open in the US.

Continue reading here:

Net neutrality lobby victorious after FCC ruling

The FCC ruled today to reinstate the concept of net neutrality. The commission says that its new rules are rooted in legal authority and serve promote freedom of speech and expression.

The new ruling labels the internet as a public utility under Title II, eliminating the ability for providers to throttle back service or create a fast lane for paid, faster access. Mobile broadband will also fall under the new strictures.

The guidelines create three bright line rules for the internet. Broadband providers may not block access to legal material, including applications and services. ISPs may also not throttle back lawful internet traffic. Finally, paid prioritization, which made the news in 2014, is abolished.

The FCCs new rules address the ever-changing nature of the internet by creating a tenet to guide practice. In short, the ISPs cannot unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage the ability of consumers to select, access, and use the lawful content, applications, services, or devices of their choosing.

The move doesnt include all elements of Title II. The FCC may investigate consumer complaints and enforce rules. However, unlike some utilities, there will be no regulation of rates. Your ISP can still set its own prices.

Telecommunications providers have already started speaking out against the move. Verizon suggests that the FCCs ruling is a throwback to rules created in the 1930s. It shared this message to voice its complaint (the translated message can be read here).

The FCC today chose to change the way the commercial Internet has operated since its creation, Verizon senior vice president Michael Glover writes. Changing a platform that has been so successful should be done, if at all, only after careful policy analysis, full transparency, and by the legislature, which is constitutionally charged with determining policy. As a result, it is likely that history will judge todays actions as misguided.

[Source FCC, Verizon]

Visit link:

FCC Reinstates Net Neutrality, Protecting Open Internet

Eddie Griffin 2015 Full Show Standing Up Funny HD---
eddie griffin freedom of speech, eddie griffin stand up, eddie griffin you can tell #39;em i said it, eddie griffin 2015, eddie griffin dysfunktional family, eddie griffin voodoo child, eddie griffin...

By: 46drt

Originally posted here:

Eddie Griffin 2015 Full Show Standing Up Funny HD--- - Video

The Deutsche Welle Governing Board decided unanimously in favor of Raif Badawi, said Deutsche Welle Director General Peter Limbourg.

"He stands, in an exemplary way, for the brave and fearless commitment to the human right of freedom of expression. Our award sends a signal and contributes to bringing his fate into the public spotlight. We hope this will increase pressure on those responsible in Saudi Arabia to release Badawi."

Badawi's wife Ensaf Haidar told DW she was overjoyed. From her home in Canada, she said the DW Freedom of Speech Award sends a clear message to the Saudi regime. "It is a disgrace that Raif is still sitting in prison - especially at a time when Saudi Arabia fights against the Islamic State group and its disregard for human rights. I am extremely thankful to Deutsche Welle for its support."

Ten years in jail, 1,000 lashes

The 31-year-old blogger was sentenced by Saudi authorities in May 2014 to 1,000 lashes, 10 years in prison and a major fine. The first 50 lashes were administered in public on January 9. He was meant to receive 50 lashes every Friday from then on, but the public flogging has been postponed more than once, reportedly for health reasons.

DW presented the Freedom of Speech award for the first time this year, in the framework of the 11th annual competition of " The Bobs Best of Online Activism," commending outstanding online activists and projects.

The winner of the Freedom of Speech Award as well as the winners of The Bobs' three jury categories will be recognized on June 23 at the Global Media Forum in Bonn, Germany.

Courageous advocate for the freedom of expression

Raif Badawi has been fighting for the freedom of expression in his country for many years. On the Free Saudi Liberals website, he attacked political and social grievances in Saudi Arabia. He published sarcastic articles on the religious police, called a prominent Saudi university a den of terrorists and wrote about Valentine's Day, which is strictly forbidden in Saudi Arabia.

In 2008, Badawi was arrested for the first time for allegedly creating an "electronic site" that "insults Islam." He left the country for a few months, only to return when the charges were dropped. In 2009, the Saudi government imposed a travel ban, and on June 17, 2012, Badawi was arrested again and put on trial, accused of insulting Muslim religious leaders on his website

Read more from the original source:

DW Freedom of Speech Award for Raif Badawi

By JULIUS KAIREY

If Israel were an Arab country, it would receive near-universal praise as a paragon of justice. Its robust protections of freedom of speech, along with frequent and open elections, would make it the only Arab state in which people have a real say in the operation of their government. Israel would be celebrated as the only gay-friendly state in a region of rampant anti-gay persecution. Its strict prohibition of the traditional practice of honor killings where women accused of disgracing the family name are murdered by their male relatives would be lauded as proof of its progressive and egalitarian values. And its modern capitalist economy, driven by a dynamic high-tech sector, would be the model for other Arab nations seeking to lift their people from the depths of poverty.

Of course, Israel isnt an Arab nation, and it is treated according to this double-standard. It is the worlds only majority-Jewish state, and it is surrounded by Arab theocracies, dictatorships and monarchies, each of which have gone to war in a failed bid to end its existence. And yet, Israels remarkable history of repeated triumph in the face of seemingly insurmountable adversity receives little sympathy among some left-wing segments of communities across the nation.

While Israels actions are put under a microscope its every flaw magnified to the maximum possible extent its enemies are given a free pass.

It is not immediately obvious why this is so. Israels history reads like a liberal success story. The Jewish people have refused to consent to their exile from the land of Israel, perpetrated by the Romans nearly 2,000 years ago. Rather than submit to oppression and injustice, Jews returned home over the centuries. In the 19th century, this movement for national liberation, called Zionism, sought to establish a modern state in the Jewish national homeland. This place would be a refuge from the forces of bigotry and hatred a place where Jews from around the world could gather for collective security whenever their lives or livelihoods came under threat. To this day, thousands of Jews migrate to Israel annually most recently from France for safety from the resurgence of anti-Semitism.

But you will not hear any of this from Israels detractors. They subject Israel to a constant torrent of demonization, all while applying a moral standard on Israel that is applied to no other country on Earth. Zionism is equated with racism and Israel is called a terrorist state, even the moral equivalent of apartheid South Africa, a country that maintained a total and systematic separation between Whites and non-Whites. These accusations continue in total disregard of the fact that Israel is the only country in the Middle East where Jews and Arabs live alongside one another in substantial numbers, vote in the same elections and serve together in the same national legislature.

While Israels actions are put under a microscope its every flaw magnified to the maximum possible extent its enemies are given a free pass. Hamas brazenly indiscriminate rocket attacks on Israeli cities which even the Palestinian Authority has called war crimes are either encouraged as necessary for resistance, or dismissed as insignificant. Hamas genocidal charter, which calls not just for the destruction of Israel but for the murder of Jews worldwide, is attributed to a harmless overreaction to Israels non-existent occupation of the Gaza Strip, not to be taken seriously. Where else is the threat of genocide not to be taken seriously?

So why cant Israel get a fair hearing in certain segments of campus communities and elsewhere? It comes down to Israels character.

Israels first crime is that it is a Western nation. In the minds of Israels critics, to be Western is to be suspect, especially when your country is juxtaposed with non-Western nations. Israeli actions are confused with colonialism by those who erroneously insist that, to this day, imperialism drives relations between Western and non-Western peoples. To attack Israel is to give non-Westerners a leg up in these supposedly colonial interactions.

Israels second offense is that it is pro-American. It is little surprise that Israels fiercest opponents are also militant critics of the United States. They deride Americas invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as modern-day imperialism and look forward to a day when America will be forced to relinquish its superpower status. Because Israel and America have such strong links, Israel is tarred as a mere instrument of Americas supposedly nefarious interests abroad. Bashing Israel is just their way of expressing contempt for the policies of the United States, and as such serves as an outlet for virulent anti-Americanism. They treat the Jewish State as America in the Middle East.

Here is the original post:

THROWDOWN THURSDAY: The Four Causes of Anti-Israelism