Category Archives: Free Speech

Free Speech - Natalie Bennett (Green Party), 17th March 2015
From BBC 3.

By: Brock Election

Read the original post:
Free Speech - Natalie Bennett (Green Party), 17th March 2015 - Video

Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV - 03/29/2015 (FULL EPISODE)
01:00 - Corporations Stealing From U.S. Troops. David Haynes explains how binding arbitration agreements directed at soldiers are leaving our veterans without homes when they return...

By: Ring of Fire Radio

Link:
Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV - 03/29/2015 (FULL EPISODE) - Video

A quick introduction to the Conservative Party - Free Speech - BBC Three
http://www.bbc.co.uk/freespeech Who are the Conservative Party? What is a Tory and why? In this highly informative film Free Speech does its best to answer these important questions.

By: BBC Three

Read more from the original source:
A quick introduction to the Conservative Party - Free Speech - BBC Three - Video

BBC Free Speech - Me and UKIP #39;s Diane James

By: Rob White

Read more:
BBC Free Speech - Me and UKIP's Diane James - Video

A quick introduction to UKIP - Free Speech - BBC Three
http://www.bbc.co.uk/freespeech Ever wondered who the UKIP are? Here is a quick Free Speech introduction to the party.

By: BBC Three

See the article here:
A quick introduction to UKIP - Free Speech - BBC Three - Video

falun gong pratitioner destroyed anti falun gong banners
falun gong pratitioner destroyed anti falun gong banners falun dafa hao? falun gong can put banners but non-falun can #39;t REALLY? WHERE IS FREE SPEECH?

By: falun gong cult

Read the original post:
falun gong pratitioner destroyed anti falun gong banners - Video

FREE SPEECH ZONE s08e13 (4-4-15)
VIDEOS: 1) Why The CIA Created ISIS - INFOWARS.COM 2) Nazemroaya The Caliphate that the ISIL Supports is a US Project - Al Jazeera 3) Kid reads pledge in Arabic, hell breaks loose - The...

By: 251omega

Go here to see the original:
FREE SPEECH ZONE s08e13 (4-4-15) - Video

FGCU tries to STOP me w/ Bogus Policy
I was preaching at FGCU on good Friday when I was challenged by a student on FGCU #39;s free speech policy. The staff and police that was on duty this day tried to say that their policy says that...

By: TeamJesusPreachers

Link:
FGCU tries to STOP me w/ Bogus Policy - Video

Supreme Court in India upholds free speech on internet, scraps Section 66A of IT Act
Supreme Court in India on March 24, 2015 upholds free speech on internet, scraps #39;unconstitutional #39; Section 66A of IT Act. The controversial cyber law that gave police sweeping powers to arrest...

By: Ravi Pradhan

Excerpt from:
Supreme Court in India upholds free speech on internet, scraps Section 66A of IT Act - Video

On April 8 and 9, the pianist Valentina Lisitsa was to perform the Rachmaninoff 2nd concerto with the Toronto Symphony Orchestra. This week, the orchestra paid out her contract, citing deeply offensive comments she was alleged to have made on her Twitter feed about the ongoing conflict in her native Ukraine.

Lisitsa, 41, who came to prominence through her YouTube videos and who has a huge social-media following, fired back promptly and at some length in a Facebook post (despite, she averred, pressure from the symphony not to go public about the incident). She makes no bones about having taken sides in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine; she is on the side of the Russian-speaking Ukrainians who represent the majority in the Crimea, and vehemently opposed to the current Ukrainian leadership. Her posts on Twitter repeatedly call Ukrainians Nazis and depicts them as a population of idiots and the insane; one purports to illustrate the leaderships faces with a photograph of pigs testicles. The feed also has some racism and overtones of anti-Semitism thrown in for good measure. But, Lisitsa says, she was exercising her right to free speech. The orchestras position is that she went too far.

This is not about political persuasion, says Jeff Melanson, the Toronto Symphonys president and CEO, in a telephone interview on Wednesday morning. He adds, Thats no issue for us. [But] artists using their Twitter or public profile to regularly speak in an intolerant or offensive way about other human beings that, you have to think about. The orchestra invoked a clause in her contract that enabled them to dismiss her.

Theres food here for legitimate debate. But legitimate debate is not necessarily whats fostered in the kangaroo court of Twitter and Facebook. The Toronto Symphony has been besieged by an outcry about free speech, and ultimately had to cancel the concerto altogether (Stewart Goodyear, who was to have replaced Lisitsa, says her supporters bullied him out). Some of the orchestras critics include people who have their own political axes to grind; some appear to believe that Lisitsa is supporting the Ukrainian rather than the Russian side in the conflict; and some include members of prominent newspapers editorial boards: the Toronto Star, for one, has weighed in with a strong indictment.

Few, if any, have mentioned an obvious recent parallel, when Opera Australia dismissed the Georgian soprano Tamar Iveri in 2014 after a lengthy Facebook post was found in which she supported attacks on a gay-pride parade in her native Georgia and referred to gay people as fecal masses. Free speech? Sure, but Iveri found precious few defenders and certainly there were no editorials defending her right to speak out.

The case against Lisitsa is arguably not quite as clear-cut. The Toronto Symphony has amassed a seven-page collection of some of her ripest Tweets, including one that mocks Ukranians in traditional folk costume by comparing them to Africans in tribal dress. There are evocations of Nazi concentration camps and the Ku Klux Klan. Theres no question that its pretty distasteful stuff; digging around in it left this reader, at least, feeling soiled.

But where do you draw the line? You could argue that Lisitsa is writing, clumsily, in the tradition of offensive satire propagated by the magazine Charlie Hebdo, whose right to free speech many in the West passionately defended in the wake of the brutal attack on their offices earlier this year, which left 12 people dead. One of Lisitsas tweets that some found objectionable This is what happens when media gets their news out of a..uh..sphincter, she wrote about a New York Times piece on Russian leaders abandoning Ukrainian separatists included a Charlie Hebdo cartoon, depicting news outlets drinking out of each others rear ends. (In a Twitter exchange, Lisitsa confirmed that she had swapped out the names of the media outlets to make the cartoon relevant to the Ukrainian situation.)

Conversely, you could argue that a musician who uses her podium for this kind of material is not someone you want associating with your orchestra. You could also argue that Lisitsa is propagating hate speech, and that hate speech is illegal in Canada and many other countries.

Theres no doubt its a gray zone, said Melanson in a telephone interview on Wednesday morning.

Whether or not you agree with the symphonys position, they have gotten the worst of it in the social-media war in part through not being more explicit right from the start about the nature of the Tweets they were protesting. In 2014, Opera Australia made it perfectly clear why they were letting Iveri go; by contrast, Melansons initial statement about ongoing accusations of deeply offensive language by Ukrainian media outlets made it sound as if the symphony were responding to someone elses claims which has fueled a lot of speculation about who it was that pressured them to act. Melanson, however, avers that no political pressure, no pressure from donors, no messages from foreign or local governments was responsible for the orchestras decision.

See the original post here:
Free speech or hate speech? Lisitsa and the TSO - The ...