Category Archives: Fiscal Freedom

Donald Trumps much-anticipated 2018 budget proposes steep cuts to domestic programsincluding the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

According to anoutline of the budget released last night, the proposal reiterates many of the cuts first rolled out by the administration earlier this year, including the elimination of the NEA and National Endowment of the Humanities (NEH). As usual, however, Congress remains intent on writing its own budget, so Trumps plan is unlikely to go far on Capitol Hill. Trumps proposal, CNN notes, is more a symbolic statement of policy than a practical budget that is expected to be adopted in full.

A spokesperson for the NEA confirms that the presidents 2018 budget proposes the elimination of the department, and includes a request for $29 million from Congress to shut down the agency in an orderly fashion. The spokesperson says that the organizationis fully funded for the fiscal year, and will continue to make 2017 grant awards and honor all obligated grant funds made to date.

She adds: This budget request is a first step in a very long budget process. We continue to accept grant applications for FY 2018 at our usual deadlines and will continue to operate as usual until a new budget is enacted by Congress.

The news of the proposed elimination of the NEA and NEH comes one day after NEH chair William D. Adams abruptly resignedfrom his post. In a statement, a spokesperson for the NEH noted that Adams decision to resign and the timing of his decision were both self-motivated and unrelated to the budget release.

The Trump administrationfirst revealed a proposal to cut the two departments in its federal budget plan this past March.The elimination of both agencies would save a paltry $300 million from the governments allotted$1.1 trillion in overallannual discretionary spending.

Despite their relatively small size, supporters of the programs say they punch above their weight, and that their elimination would have a serious impact on cultural production. The NEA provides funding to often-overlooked cultural organizations outside major US cities and, through its international insurance indemnity program, enables museums to organize ambitious loan shows that would otherwise be prohibitively expensive.

Still, arts advocates shouldnt be too worriedyet. Trumps proposal is likely to face fierce opposition in Congress. Several Republican politicians have come out in favor of federal support for cultural organizations in recent months.

Congress $1 trillion budget to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year on September 30, which passed earlier this month, included $150 million each for the NEA and NEH (a $2 million increase, respectively, from 2016).The Institute of Museum and Library Services, also targeted by Trump for elimination, saw a small increase in its annual funding,from$230 million to $231 million. The Smithsonian Institutions budget increased to $863 million, up $23 millionfrom last year.

Today, the Smithsonian released its 2018 federal budget request, totaling $947 million, an increase of $108.4 million from 2017. According to a statement, much of the increase will be directed to the National Air and Space Museums multiyear revitalization project.

Mark Meadows, a Republican Representative from North Carolina and the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told The New York Timesthat Trumps budget is probably is the most conservative budget that weve had under Republican or Democrat administrations in decades.

To finance a dramatic increase in spending on the military and border security, Trump has proposed cutting more than $800 billion from the healthcare program Medicaid over the next decade and $192 billion from nutritional assistance programs like Meals on Wheels, which delivers food to the poor. Meadows told the NYT: Meals on Wheels, even for some of us who are considered to be fiscal hawks, may be a bridge too far.

Excerpt from:

Donald Trump's Newly Released 2018 Budget Calls for Eliminating the NEA - artnet News

WASHINGTON The Border Adjustment Tax may not be dead, but President Donald Trump himself may be giving up on making the controversial surcharge on imports part of a tax reform bill later this year.

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin indicated during a private meeting with House Freedom Caucus members on Tuesday that Trump doesnt support the Border Adjustment Tax.

He indicated the president is not supportive of the BAT and that we should discuss other differences that might move things forward, one Freedom Caucus member in attendance told HuffPost, requesting anonymity.

Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) said Mnuchin indicated that Trump is moving from a noncommittal, at times ambivalent, stance on the border adjustment tax to straight-out opposition.

He said POTUS was concerned it would affect too many people adversely that are often forgotten in tax reform, Meadows said.

A border adjustment tax, which still has the support of some GOP House leaders, would impose significant levies on imported goods from clothing to auto parts, driving up prices for Americans.

Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images

It is somewhat of a tax on consumers, another Freedom Caucus member, Rep. Rod Blum (R-Iowa), told HuffPost.

Blum agreed with other Freedom Caucus members that Mnuchin seemed doubtful about prospects for a border adjustment tax.

My feeling is its not going to make it through, Blum said, adding that he thought Trump and Mnuchin felt the same way.

I dont know if theyve given up, but my sense out of that meeting was that Mnuchin and he doesnt speak for the president, of course, but doesnt think that, Blum said, trailing off. Theres just too much controversy. Too many people are divided about it.

Mnuchin himself issued his strongest words against the tax on Tuesday during a Peter G. Peterson Fiscal Policy Summit.

One of the problems with the border adjustment tax is that it doesnt create a level playing field, Mnuchin said. It has very different impacts on different companies. It has the potential to pass on significant costs to the consumer. It has the potential of moving the currencies. We want to make sure were creating a level playing field.

Republicans in Congress also poured cold water on the tax during a Ways and Means hearing, with Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) publicly switching from a supporter of the tax to an opponent.

Still, its hard to declare the border tax idea totally dead. Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) remains an enthusiastic supporter, and Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) hasnt given up on the scheme, though he did signal some openness to new proposals Tuesday.

If someone has a better solution, Brady said, bring it.

Read more from the original source:

Treasury Secretary Suggests Trump Opposes Border Adjustment Tax - HuffPost

The Pew Research Center May 18 released information from a study that said more foreign graduates of U.S. colleges particularly from India and China are staying in the country to work.

The center said that a growing number of high-skilled foreign workers find jobs in the U.S. under the Optional Practical Training program, which allows foreign graduates from U.S. universities to work in the country on a temporary basis.

The federal government approved nearly 700,000 OPT applications in fiscal years 2008 through 2014, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data received through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Data suggests that the total number of foreign graduates using OPT may continue to increase in subsequent years: more than 1 million foreign students studied at U.S. higher educational institutions in the 2015-16 school year, a record high, the center said.

Foreign student U.S. college graduates with F-1 visas may apply for an OPT, and those approved may work in the U.S. for up to 12 months in their field of study. Foreign students majoring in a STEM field may work in the U.S. up to 36 months.

Unlike other U.S. visa programs, OPT has no cap on the number of foreign graduates who can participate. OPT is not subject to congressional oversight, though the program, which was created in 1947, can be changed by a U.S. president, according to the center news release.

Recently, a lawsuit filed by the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers challenging the 24-month OPT extension granted by the Obama administration was dismissed in federal court.

In the lawsuit, WATW argued that the extension of the OPT program denied labor protections to American technology workers, allows increased and unfair competition in the U.S., among other concerns.

It said it violates procedural rights of American workers by failing to include the question of whether OPT should be expanded in the first place in the regulatory process by the Department of Homeland Security.

The DHS argued in favor of retention of the extended 24-month OPT, and asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit, which the court did in April.

The Pew Research Center news release said that the annual number of OPT approvals rose from 28,497 in fiscal 2008 to 136,617 in fiscal 2014, a nearly fivefold increase. During this time, the Bush administration extended the amount of time STEM graduates may work in the U.S. to a maximum of 29 months. In 2016, the Obama administration again expanded the work period for STEM graduates to its current 36-month maximum.

Nearly as many people are approved for the OPT program as receive H-1B visas, another main source of high-skilled foreign workers who work in the U.S. on a temporary basis, according to Pews findings.

STEM graduates made up nearly half 49 percent of all those who were approved for OPT and were seeking employment in calendar years 2012 through 2015, it added. STEM degrees accounted for six-in-ten of the most numerous majors among OPT approvals, with the remaining four in business-related fields.

Those with STEM majors had a higher employment rate, of 73 percent, than non-STEM majors, 57 percent, in the OPT program from 2012 to 2015, the research found

Additionally, foreign students from India (72,151) and China (68,847) accounted for 57 percent of all those who were approved for OPT and found jobs from 2012 to 2015, accounting for 72,151 students from India and 68,847 from China.

The research also found that graduates in STEM fields accounted for at least 70 percent of OPT approvals from India, Iran, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka from 2012 to 2015.

Of the 72,151 from India employed under OPT, 84 percent had STEM degrees, the highest percentage of any origin country.

Just 4 percent of those employed under the OPT program from 2012 to 2015 worked at the 10 largest tech companies in the Fortune 500, it said.

The 10 universities with the most OPT approvals accounted for 13 percent of all program participants seeking employment from 2012 to 2015, with the University of Southern California, 7,485 participants; Columbia University, 7,116; and New York University, 5,260, accounting for the most graduates in the program.

Read more:

More Indian Graduates of U.S. Colleges Staying in the Country to Work Under the OPT Program - India West

NEW HAVEN >> A department head for whom the Board of Alders rejected a $20,000 raise because of its tight finances two years ago was given it anyway, setting up a fight between the board and Mayor Toni Harp.

The salary for Jason Bartlett, who is director of youth services, has been $85,000 for the past several years, according to city budget documents. But the mayor in August 2015 approved an adjustment in his salary to $105,000, retroactive to July 1, 2015, despite the action of the alders.

In addition to Bartlett, there were some five other employees who were given raises that were not approved first by the alders, according to data sent to the board from the Human Resources office.

One of those individuals was then Labor Relations Director Marcus Paca, whom Harp fired the following spring. Paca has since sued the city over the firing and is now running for mayor.

Advertisement

Budget Director Joe Clerkin, in answer to questions from the aldermanic Finance Committee, said the mayor had an arrangement with then-Superintendent of Schools Garth Harries that the Board of Education would cover the extra $20,000 as she had given Bartlett additional duties, namely to be her liaison with the school board.

Harp was elected president of the school board from September 2015 to January 2017. During that time, the mayor backed Harries, but others on the board wanted him out.

In September 2016, Harries reached an agreement to end his contract with the district two years early and was given some $200,000 in severance.

Will Clark, chief operating officer for the school system, and Interim Superintendent. of Schools Reginald Mayo both told the Finance Committee that they werent aware of any such arrangement over Bartletts salary, but promised to look into it.

Mayo wasnt interim superintendent at the time and Victor De La Paz, who was then chief financial officer for the schools, resigned in July 2016 to become the finance officer for Achievement First, a charter school organization.

The alders contend that both the raises and an arrangement for payment to cover Bartletts salary from both the city and the school board are charter violations.

They cite Section 2-386 of the charter, which states that aldermanic prior approval is needed for a budget transfer in order to increase the total annual salary estimate included in an appropriation for any reason.

They also cite Section 14, which covers conflict of interest and the code of ethics and says holding a dual position is prohibited.

It goes on to say: No person shall receive compensation for service on more than one board or commission or for more than one position in the city government.

There are instances where both the city and the school board will contribute to programs involving youths.

Clerkin said the $20,000 never came from the school board in fiscal 2015-16, nor has it been sent to the budget office for the current fiscal year.

The alders, as part of the Finance Committee deliberations last week, reminded city supervisors that all funding transfers have to be approved by them.

Whats the point of having a budget? Alder Anna Festa, D-10, said Saturday, if the alders dont know where the money is coming from to cover transfers.

She said one of the main functions of the alders is to make sure that the administration is being accountable to the charter.

Clerkin, in his memo to the alders, said Harp felt it was appropriate to increase his (Bartletts) salary to $105,000, to compensate him for his extra duties.

The mayor discussed with then-Superintendent Harries that the Board of Education pay Mr. Bartlett the $20,000 difference in his salary. At the time the superintendent agreed to this arrangement, but (then) left the NHPS (New Haven Public School) system. The city will endeavor to be compensated for the difference from the Board of Education and will seek to be compensated for this amount from the board going forward, Clerkin wrote.

The citys close-out report for fiscal 2015-2016, submitted on Oct. 7, 2016, shows the list of accounts with a surplus and those with a deficit. The Youth Services department ended with a deficit of $19,483.

It was covered when a total of $5.9 million in surplus money was transferred to cover all department deficits in order to end the year with a balanced budget. The biggest shortfalls were the accounts for police and fire service, as well as health benefits.

Laurence Grotheer, spokesman for the mayor, said he wasnt aware of the payment arrangement regarding Bartlett.

But, with that original request 18 months ago, the mayor made it clear that she thought that position with its added responsibility warranted that salary increase, Grotheer said of Bartletts raise given his assignment to work with the school board on issues.

Grotheer noted Bartlett was a big part of the reading commission, which recently issued a report on how to improve literacy in the Elm City from birth to adulthood.

He also said Bartlett works closely with Gemma Joseph Lumpkin, who is head of Youth, Family and Community Engagement for the school system.

Bartlett said he thought it was a resolved issue.

I feel that I have brought $1 million from the Burn (public safety) grant. I brought hundreds of thousands of extra dollars for youths from the state of Connecticut, from private foundations. We have tripled the capacity of what we have done within the department, he said. So I really feel I have the outcomes that justify what the mayor approved some time ago in terms of my salary. It is not a great feeling to be in the middle of whatever procedural fight. I think it is bad for my morale and I think it is bad for city employees.

The alders sought information from the human resource department on salary increase over the past three years and found several that went into effect allegedly without transfer approval at the direction of the mayor after the lower figure was approved by the alders as a budget line item.

The alders said their review is about the process and is not directed at the merits of the employees.

The documents showed a salary boost to $105,000 from $93,468 for Andy Wolf, who is director of Arts, Culture and Tourism, in August 2015, effective July 1, 2015 when the 2014-15 budget was approved at the lesser amount.

Serena Neal-Sanjurjo, the executive director of the Livable City Initiative, was in the fiscal budget for 2016 at $100,000 and received a raise to $110,000 in Oct. 2016, effective July 1, 2016; City Plan Director Karyn Gilvarg had a salary of $103,372 approved for fiscal 2017 and also in October received a raise to $111,000 effective July 1, 2016.

Then Labor Relations Director Paca, who was budgeted at a $98,000 salary for fiscal 2016, got a raise to $105,000 effective July 1, 2015, also allegedly without transfer approval.

Harp fired him in April 2016, citing memoranda of understanding he and two other officials endorsed six months earlier with the fire union without sending a fiscal impact statement to the Board of Alders, according to the New Haven Independent.

She also listed the release of material a union had requested under the Freedom of Information Act the city claims was confidential. Those emails indicate the city had planned to fire then-Commission on Equal Opportunity Executive Director Nichole Jefferson before their investigation into charges against her began, as well as get rid of the staff. Jeffersons arbitration fight is wrapping up after more than a year of testimony.

Joanne Courtmanche, the executive administrative assistant in the labor relations office, got a raise to $65,368 from $57,368, according the paper work provided to the alders. The position was approved in the fiscal 2017 budget at the lower rate. Her raise was also approved by Harp in October 2016.

Read the rest here:

New Haven alders raising questions about raises they did not approve - New Haven Register

Taxpayers started footing the bill for housing Ivan Moreno Miranda shortly after a Border Patrol agent caught him on Jan. 14.

Moreno Miranda crossed the border illegally near Douglas after being deported in 2013, federal court records show. The U.S. Attorneys Office filed criminal charges against him and on Jan. 17 he was placed in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service while his case unfolded, at a daily detention cost of about $80.

The cost of detaining Moreno Miranda kept growing until Thursday, when federal Judge Raner C. Collins sentenced him to time served. After four months in the custody of the Marshals Service, the cost of housing Moreno Miranda came to about $9,600.

Those expenses can escalate quickly.

A similar, but longer and costlier, story played out with David Borrayo Fajardo, who was also sentenced Thursday. He was caught in October near Ajo, crossing the border illegally a month after being deported. He had a series of criminal convictions from the early 1990s, including aggravated assault when he was 19 years old, according to a sentencing memorandum.

His attorney needed more time to prepare and the proceedings lasted three months longer than Moreno Mirandas case, court records show. After seven months in marshals service custody, the cost to house Borrayo Fajardo came to about $16,800.

In the last decade, housing people on immigration-related charges in Southern Arizona cost taxpayers more than $1.8 billion, according to statistics obtained by the Arizona Daily Star through public-records requests.

The Marshals Service spent about $1.1 billion in Southern Arizona housing people on similar charges in fiscal years 2007-15, according to agency records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.

More than 90 percent of those funds, or about $1 billion, went to the Central Arizona Detention Center in Florence owned by CoreCivic, formerly known as Corrections Corporation of America.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spent $760 million detaining people for violating immigration laws in Southern Arizona in fiscal years 2007-16, agency records obtained through a public-records request show.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons is housing 2,825 immigration offenders who were sentenced in Arizona, at an annual cost of $98 million, according to agency statistics obtained through a public-records request. Most of them are housed elsewhere in the country, while 266 are housed in Arizona at an annual cost of $9.2 million.

Arizona sheriffs departments spent $335 million in fiscal years 2009-16 housing illegal immigrants convicted of breaking state and local laws, according to statistics provided by Cochise County Sheriff Mark Dannels, president of the Arizona Sheriffs Association.

In all, detaining illegal immigrants in Southern Arizona cost taxpayers well over $2 billion in the past decade, not including the costs of the Border Patrols holding facilities, where illegal immigrants are held for hours or days after an agent catches them near the border.

ICE saw its annual detention costs in Southern Arizona quadruple during fiscal years 2007-16 to $96 million. Detention costs for the Marshals Service grew by 50 percent to $141 million in fiscal year 2015, the most recent year for which the Star could obtain Marshals Service records.

Those costs could continue to rise as federal agencies put in motion the Feb. 20 directive from Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly to end the policy of catch-and-release of illegal immigrants, in which authorities issue notices to appear at removal hearings, rather than take them into custody.

To keep pace with the expected rise in detainees, Kelly directed ICE and U.S. Customs and Border Protection to allocate all available resources to expand their detention capabilities and capacities at or near the border with Mexico to the greatest extent possible.

In an April 11 memo, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions directed federal prosecutors in border states to prioritize a variety of immigration-related crimes and to develop guidelines for prosecutions to accomplish the goal of deterring first-time improper entrants.

A memo from the U.S. Attorneys Office describing new plea agreement policies indicates the federal court in Tucson will see more felony prosecutions of immigration-related crimes, such as crossing the border illegally after deportation.

From a defense attorneys perspective, its job security, lawyer F. Michael Carrillo said after a hearing in federal court in Tucson. From a human perspective, its a scam. Its heartbreaking.

These are the bad hombres? Carrillo continued. For many of his clients, their criminal history is a bunch of immigration violations.

Despite spending $760 million of taxpayer money, ICE declined to allow the Star to tour detention facilities, provide the number of ICE detainees in Southern Arizona, or provide the daily cost to house a detainee.

The Border Patrol did not respond to requests for information about the use of various enforcement tools; where illegal immigrants are sent after leaving Border Patrol custody; or statistics on the agencys prosecution programs.

The U.S. Attorneys Office did not respond to a request for information about how prosecutors decide to file criminal charges in immigration-related cases, how those decisions evolved in the last decade, and how new policies affect those decisions.

Without information from official sources other than the Marshals Service, the Star used interviews with defense lawyers, agency reports, and court records to sketch the outlines of how the immigration detention system works in Southern Arizona.

Illegal immigrants take a myriad of paths through the detention system, but they can be divided roughly into two basic paths: criminal and administrative.

On the path that involves criminal charges, a federal prosecutor decides whether to charge a detainee at a Border Patrol station with illegal re-entry, the legal term for crossing the border illegally after being deported, or another immigration-related crime.

If criminal charges are filed, defendants are taken into custody by the Marshals Service which Fidencio Rivera, chief deputy U.S. marshal in Arizona, described as the federal sheriffs office while their cases are prosecuted.

About one-third of the people apprehended by the Border Patrol in the Tucson Sector are charged criminally. For fiscal years 2011-16, about 580,000 apprehensions resulted in about 205,000 prosecutions, according to the Border Patrols annual sector profiles.

While Moreno Miranda and Borrayo Fajardo went through a monthslong process of prosecution, thousands more immigration-related cases are handled through fast-track prosecution programs, such as Operation Streamline, and usually are resolved in a matter of days.

After Borrayo Fajardos sentencing Thursday to one year in prison, with credit for time served, the Marshals Service will take him to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility, court records show. The judge recommended he be placed in an institution in or near Arizona.

On the administrative path, Moreno Miranda was sentenced to time served and will not be taken to federal prison. Instead, ICE likely will place him in a detention center while he is processed for deportation.

ICE also takes custody of illegal immigrants when they are released from county jails or after federal prosecutors decline to file criminal charges.

During fiscal years 2007-15, ICE handled 110,000 administrative arrests in Arizona, according to the Department of Homeland Securitys Office of Immigration Statistics.

Detainees can remain in ICE custody for a few days or for many months, depending on whether they choose to appeal their removal order, apply for asylum, or if their country of origin delays in issuing travel documents.

In a separate administrative path, Border Patrol agents use expedited removal, which allows for deportation without involving an immigration court.

A recent report by the Migration Policy Institute on the Border Patrols consequence delivery system showed about half of the Tucson Sector apprehensions researchers could track in fiscal year 2014 resulted in expedited removal, 26 percent were prosecuted and 12 percent led to voluntary returns and notices to appear.

Statistics provided by ICE showed where detention dollars were spent in Southern Arizona for fiscal years 2013-16, but for previous years the agency provided only annual spending totals.

For the four years with detailed information, ICE spent a total of $167.3 million at the agency-owned facility in Florence, $136.2 million at CoreCivics facility in Eloy, $66.8 million at CoreCivics facility in Florence and $15.5 million at the Pinal County Sheriffs Office.

The Marshals Service guarantees payment for 3,420 beds at CoreCivic facilities, Rivera said. The agency also uses 293 beds at the Federal Correctional Institution-Tucson, but does not pay for those beds.

The marshals service also paid $48.6 million in fiscal years 2007-15 to the San Luis Regional Detention Center, near Yuma, operated by Emerald Cos. LaSalle Corrections now owns the facility.

Rivera declined to provide the daily bed rate charged by CoreCivic, citing concerns about competition for the government contract.

However, the Marshals Services detention budget submission for fiscal year 2017 showed the average daily jail costs at private facilities was $79.24 in fiscal year 2015, up from $72.88 in fiscal year 2011. The agency expected that rate to have risen to $80.67 in fiscal year 2016 and $82.22 in fiscal year 2017.

The daily cost at the Federal Bureau of Prisons facilities comes to $88, according to calculations included in presentence reports in immigration-related cases.

CoreCivic has come under fire for 15 in-custody deaths at the Eloy Detention Center since 2003 and immigrant-rights activists decry a profit-making motive behind incarceration.

CoreCivic did not respond to a request for comment. But Rivera said the companys facilities are the only places that can handle the volume of detainees handled by the Marshals Service.

We couldnt do our jobs without them, Rivera said.

The company also saved the agency money by building a medical facility, Rivera said, which helped avoid the costly practice of sending deputy marshals to guard inmates at local hospitals.

See more here:

Border detentions in Southern Arizona cost $2B in last decade - Arizona Daily Star

The 2017 Legislatures slow crawl reflects both complexity of intertwining bills on budget, tax and school finance, as well as the strategy of frustrating rank-and-file lawmakers with gridlock until they bend to the will of Republican leadership and Gov. Sam Brownback.

The session reaches the 100th day on Wednesday, and the clock is running out. Decisions by legislators have to be rendered by close of the fiscal year June 30.

Timing is important to Brownback, who delayed joining the administration of President Donald Trump to defend cornerstone pieces of a governorship that was to set the foundation for decades of GOP dominance. Brownback famously made Kansas a laboratory of supply-side economics. In 2012, his idea was to prove through political chemistry the power of reducing income taxes.

It didnt work out. Brownbacks approval ratings moved inversely to state budget deficits. Legislative allies retired or were defeated. After five years of experimentation, flames of revolution are flickering.

Finding members of the Legislature who believe Brownback will be Kansas governor at close of the second term in January 2019 is as hard as identifying folks eager for Brownback to pay tax-cut architect Arthur Laffer another $75,000 to make bold statements about magic of supply-side theory.

Heres a sample of Laffers pro-growth zeal: Cutting taxes can have a near immediate and permanent impact, which is why we have advised Oklahoma, Kansas, and other states to cut their income tax rates if they want the most effective immediate and lasting boost to their states economies.

When the Legislature wraps the 2017 session in the next couple weeks, Brownback will be compelled to drink a bitter concoction of school, tax and budget Kool-Aid to cover revenue shortfalls inspired by the Laffer-Brownback tax agenda.

And, then, one of the most conservative governors in Kansas history will be gone.

Dont be surprised if Brownback declares his vision of tax and education policy a success. He will point to his work on abortion, Medicaid, gun rights, welfare, the arts, government efficiency, technical education, water conservation, pensions and union busting.

His critics will respond with fervor.

The Atlantic and other publications devoted to figuring out Brownbacks next professional endeavor believe he will return to Washington, D.C., as Trumps ambassador of religious freedom. Brownback is well-suited for the role by virtue of deep personal conviction and familiarity with political life in the District of Columbia, where he served in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.

I do not believe in removal of faith from the public square, said Brownback, who followed a deep calling and converted to Catholicism about 15 years ago.

Hes supported efforts in Washington and Topeka to infuse government with religion as a common-sense way to encourage the miraculous work of many highly effective faith-based charities.

Walking away from the governorship in Kansas carries no shame. Gov. Kathleen Sebelius resigned in April 2009 to join the administration of President Barack Obama. The remainder of her second term was filled by Mark Parkinson, who was her lieutenant governor.

If the Kansas Supreme Court finds legislators and Brownback failed to live up to the judicial branchs constitutional guidance on increasing K-12 funding, Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer would make calling a special session of the Legislature one of his first substantive duties as governor. He would be at the helm as state lawmakers raised taxes, again, to bail out Laffer and his followers.

Read the original post:

Clock ticking on Brownback's time as governor - The Garden City Telegram

THREE days after the 9/11 attacks both houses of Congress voted correctlyand without objectorsto authorize the President to use force against those who perpetrated the attacks and those who aided them.

Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden had been living in Afghanistan, where the radical Islamist Taliban regime gave him sanctuary.

The US sought to end that regime, capture or kill bin Laden and other al-Qaida terrorists, and prevent Afghan territory from being used to harbor and train terrorists who could attack the United States in the future.

But President George W. Bush ultimately proposed a post-9/11 strategy that went beyond national defense.

We are committed to freedom in Afghanistan, in Iraq and in a peaceful Palestine, Bush said on May 1, 2003.

The advance of freedom is the surest strategy to undermine the appeal of terror in the world, he said. Where freedom takes hold, hatred gives way to hope. When freedom takes hold, men and women turn to the peaceful pursuit of a better life. American values, and American interests, lead in the same direction. We stand for human liberty.

When Barack Obama was elected President in 2008, the U.S. still had about 32,500 troops in Afghanistan, according to the Congressional Research Service. By the second quarter of fiscal 2011, Obama had increased those forces to 99,800. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, as he prepared to leave office, there were still 9,800 there.

But have we eliminated the threat al-Qaida, and those who share its ideology, pose to the United States?

The most recent inspector generals report on the US military mission in Afghanistan indicates the Taliban and al-Qaida are still active there and the Islamic State has established a presence.

Insurgent attacks continued across Afghanistan this quarter with the Taliban remaining the greatest threat to the Afghan government, said the report.

US counterterrorism operations this quarter disrupted al-Qaidas ability to attack the US and Afghan forces by reducing its numbers to under 100 fighters and killing three of its top leaders, said the report. However, al-Qaida in Afghanistan remained affiliated with the worldwide al-Qaida organization and, according to (US commander) General Nicholson, these groups together have the intent and capability to conduct attacks outside Afghanistan.

And how is freedom doing in Afghanistan? Human rights problems in the country, according to the State Departments 2016 report on that issue, included extra-judicial killings by security forces, ineffective government investigations of abuse and torture by local security forces; poor prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention, including of women accused of so-called moral crimes; prolonged pretrial detentions; judicial corruption and ineffectiveness; violations of privacy rights; restrictions on freedom of speech, press, religion, and movement; pervasive governmental corruption; underage and forced marriages; abuse of children, including sexual abuse; trafficking in persons, including forced labor; discrimination against persons with disabilities; discrimination and abuses against ethnic minorities; societal discrimination based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and HIV/AIDS status; and abuse of workers rights, including child labor.

The Worldwide Threat Assessment that the director of national intelligence, Dan Coats, presented to the Senate intelligence committee last week did not paint an optimistic picture for Afghanistan.

The overall situation in Afghanistan will very likely continue to deteriorate, even if international support is sustained, said the threat assessment. Endemic state weaknesses, the governments political fragility, deficiencies of the Afghan national security forces, Taliban persistence, and regional interference will remain key impediments to improvement.

The fighting will also continue to threaten US personnel, allies, and partners, particularly in Kabul and urban population centers, said the assessment. IS Khorasan branchwhich constitutes IS most significant presence in South Asiawill probably remain a low-level developing threat to Afghan stability as well as to US and Western interests in the region in 2017.

The same threat assessment pointed to a terror threat to the homeland that is now homegrown.

US-based homegrown violent extremists (HVEs) will remain the most frequent and unpredictable Sunni violent extremist threat to the US homeland, said the assessment. They will be spurred on by terrorist groups public calls to carry out attacks in the West. The threat of HVE attacks will persist, and some attacks will probably occur with little or no warning.

In addition to the HVE threat, a small number of foreign-based Sunni violent extremist groups will also pose a threat to the US homeland and continue publishing multilingual propaganda that calls for attacks against US and Western interests in the US homeland and abroad, it said.

The ultimate strategic aim of the United States in responding to the terrorist threat exemplified by al-Qaida and the Islamic State should not focus on establishing freedom in Afghanistan or any other distant land but rather on maintaining the God-given rights of life, liberty and property here.

Key to that is preventing terrorists from entering this country and depriving us of those rights here.

In the coming months, Republicans in Congress working with a Republican in the White House will have the opportunity to take concrete acts to secure our border and more aggressively vet those we let legally cross it.

If they want to keep America secure and free, they need to do it.

CREATORS.COM

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSnews.com.

Read more here:

Can the US fix Afghanistan? - The Manila Times Online - The Manila Times

A growing number of high-skilled foreign workers find jobs in the United States under a program known as Optional Practical Training (OPT), which allows foreign graduates from U.S. universities to work in the country on a temporary basis. The federal government approved nearly 700,000 OPT applications in fiscal years 2008 through 2014, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data received through a Freedom of Information Act request. Data suggest that the total number of foreign graduates using OPT may continue to increase in subsequent years: More than 1 million foreign students studied at U.S. higher educational institutions in the 2015-16 school year, a record high.

U.S. college graduates with F-1 visas for foreign students may apply to OPT, and those approved may work in the U.S. for up to 12 months in their field of study. Foreign students majoring in a science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) field may work in the U.S. for longer up to 36 months. Unlike other U.S. visa programs, OPT has no cap on the number of foreign graduates who can participate. OPT is not subject to congressional oversight, though the program, which was created in 1947, can be changed by a U.S. president.

Here are some key facts about foreign collegegraduates working in the U.S. under the Optional Practical Training program.

1The annual number of OPT approvals rose from 28,497 in fiscal 2008 to 136,617 in fiscal 2014, a nearly fivefold increase. This growth happened after the Bush administration in 2008 extended the amount of time STEM graduates may work in the U.S. to a maximum of 29 months. About half of STEM graduates have extended their OPT program beyond the initial 12-month period in recent years. In 2016, the Obama administration again expanded the work period for STEM graduates to its current 36-month maximum.

2Nearlyas many people are approved for the OPT program as receive H-1B visas, another main source of high-skilled foreign workers who work in the U.S. on a temporary basis. From fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2014, 768,214 H-1B visas were awarded, compared with 696,914 OPT approvals. Many of those working in the U.S. under the OPT program go on to apply for H-1B visas to stay longer in the U.S.

3STEM graduates made up nearly half (49%) of all those who were approved for OPT and were seeking employment in calendar years 2012 through 2015.STEM degrees accounted for six-in-ten of the most numerous majors among OPT approvals, with the remaining four in business-related fields. The three most common majors during this period were business administration and management (37,289), electrical and electronics engineering (26,873) and computer science (25,471).

4Those with STEM majors had a higher employment rate (73%) than non-STEM majors (57%) in the OPT program from 2012 to 2015. Among the 10 most numerous majors, computer engineering (76%), mechanical engineering (75%), and electrical and electronics engineering (75%) had the highest employment rates.

5Foreign students from India (72,151) and China (68,847) accounted for more than half (57%) of all those who were approved for OPT and found jobs from 2012 to 2015. Other top countries included South Korea (14,242), Taiwan (7,032) and Nepal (5,309).

6Graduates in STEM fields accounted for at least 70% of OPT approvals from India, Iran, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka from 2012 to 2015. Of the 72,151 from India employed under OPT, 84% had STEM degrees, the highest percentage of any origin country. Iran (79%), Bangladesh (74%) and Sri Lanka (70%) also had high shares of STEM graduates. Among those from China, 54% went to STEM graduates.

7Just 4% of those employed under the OPT program from 2012 to 2015 workedat the 10 largest tech companies in the Fortune 500. Amazon (1,936), Intel (1,563), Qualcomm (1,080) and Microsoft (1,067) employed the most workers under the OPT program. The 10 largest financial services companies hired fewer workers, with JP Morgan Chase (725), Bank of America (247) and Citigroup (205) among the top employers.

8The 10 universities with the most OPT approvals accounted for 13% of all program participants seeking employment from 2012 to 2015. The University of Southern California (7,485 participants), Columbia University (7,116) and New York University (5,260) graduated the most students in the program. Among the top 10 universities, nearly 59% found jobs.

Topics: Education, Educational Attainment, Migration, Science and Innovation, Work and Employment

Originally posted here:

More foreign grads of US colleges are staying in the country to work - Pew Research Center

By Austin Harrington Staff Writer aharrington@amestrib.com

Freedom Flight

During Mondays meeting of the Boone City Council, a discussion was held that concerned funding for the Boone Freedom Flight, which is planning a trip for Boone County Veterans in October. In a previous Boone City Council meeting, the council approved appropriating $5,000 to support the trip if the freedom flight organizers were able to reach their fundraising goals. Even though the group came up a little short of its overall goal, the council still voted to approve the funds during Mondays meeting.

Budget Amendments

The council also approved a list of budget amendments that mostly allowed the city to close out projects that were started during the previous fiscal year, but for various reasons were unable to be completed. The changes were made mostly to pay for the cost of things such as rental codes and the closing out a FEMA project, as well as building and garage repairs.

Administrator Training

The council went on to approve training for city administrator William Skare. The training is part of a state program through Drake University where Skare will be going to Des Moines a few times a month to achieve a certification that allows him to be a certified city administrator in Boone. According to the universitys website, the program takes roughly 18 months to complete.

Salary Adjustments

During Mondays meeting, the council also approved an increase in salary for all full-time non-union and part-time employees. The increase will be 2.75 percent will include department heads such as Rhonda Clayton, Utility Billing Supervisor, Ondrea Elmquist, Clerk/Finance Officer, Justin Adams, Fire Chief, John Wiebold, Police Chief, Bill Skare, City Administrator/Director of Public Safety, John Rouse, Public Works/Parks Director, Ed Higgins, Building Official, and Wayne Schwartz, City Engineer. The salary increases will go into effect July 1.

Read more:

What you need to know from Monday's Boone City Council meeting - Boone News-Republican

Conservative Review

12 states in for freedom: Missouri votes for Convention of States Conservative Review SCR4, sponsored by Senator Mike Kehoe, R-Jefferson City, calls for an Article V Convention of States to propose constitutional amendments that impose fiscal restraint on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal ...

Here is the original post:

12 states in for freedom: Missouri votes for Convention of States - Conservative Review