Category Archives: Fake News

Poland has made it clear that it will not send any fighter jets to Ukraine, underscoring considerable ambiguity over the scope of the European Unions military assistance to Kyiv.

On CBSs Face the Nation, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken stated that the US is engaging with the Poles and discussing the entire matter with the rest of NATO countries.

We are also working on the capabilities we could provide to backfill Poland if it decided to transfer planes to Ukraine, he added.

On March 6, Blinken told reporters during his visit to Moldova, We are looking actively now at the question of airplanes that Poland may provide to Ukraine and looking at how we might be able to backfill should Poland decide to supply those planes.I cant speak to a timeline but I can just say were looking at it very, very actively, he added.

Previously, Bulgaria and Slovakia ruled out the transfer of military planes to Ukraine. Politico reported that the discussions are now focused on Warsaw and center around the US sending American-built jets to replace the MiG-29s.

The Polish government, in contrast to Blinkens statement, appeared to take a divergent stand on the issue. In a tweet, the Chancellery of the Polish Prime Minister rejected rumors that the country is in talks with the US to backfill its fighter plane fleet if Warsaw decides to deliver its MiG-29s to Kyiv.

On March 1, Polish President Andrzej Duda stated that his country will not send any jets to Ukrainian airspace, adding that that would open a military interference in the Ukrainian conflict. Mateusz Morawiecki, Polands Prime Minister, also ruled out such a possibility. Poland doesnt have such plans, he said.

Meanwhile, Poland approved a draft bill to create a $1.75 billion fund to help war refugees from Ukraine. Over one million people have crossed into Poland and thousands have been hosted across the country, Reuters reported.

The legislation strives to permit the funding of food and temporary lodgings for refugees, along with measures allowing them to legally work and access public healthcare and social assistance in Poland.

NATO has taken a defensive stance so far, claiming that it did not want to be involved in the Russia-Ukraine war. The military bloc also rebuffed Ukraines demand for a no-fly zone, fearing an escalation, prompting a harsh response from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who labeled NATO as weak.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has made it abundantly clear that any country attempting to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine will be deemed an armed conflict by his administration.

Russias Defense Ministry has also threatened countries, notably NATO member Romania, against hosting Kyivs military planes, claiming that they could end up being involved in an armed conflict.

In a video conference, defense ministry spokesperson Igor Konashenkov claimed that several Ukrainian combat jets had been redeployed to Romania and other Ukraines neighbors.

He emphasized that if the jets attacked Russian forces from those countries, it could be considered an engagement in the military conflict. Konashenkov said: We know for sure that Ukrainian combat aircraft have flown to Romania and other neighboring countries.

The spokesperson further stated that Ukraines combat-ready aircraft had been destroyed in practically all instances. Romanias Prime Minister Nicolae Ciuc responded by saying, Its pure rhetoric designed to divert attention from what is really happening on the ground civilians killed, the rules of armed conflict flouted.

Moscow could try all they want to scare Romania, he added, but we have no reason to feel threatened. Ciuc highlighted an episode that occurred on February 24, the first day of the conflict, when a Ukrainian fighter plane was intercepted and allowed to land in Romanian airspace. The incursion was caused by a technical glitch, the pilot reportedly told Romanian officials.

Ciuc said that his jet was permitted to leave unarmed a few days later and that the episode had been made public to prevent misunderstandings with Moscow.

With NATO Article 5 in place, the risk of confrontation beyond Ukraine is very high. If Russia follows through on its warning and attacks NATO country in any way, the situation may quickly escalate into a bigger confrontation between Russia and the West. This is why NATO has rejected the EU fighter transfer plan.

Read more from the original source:

Fake News! Poland Slams US Reports As Misinformation; Says No Fighter Jets For Ukraine But Ready To Help Refugees - EurAsian Times

Fenerbahce have reacted furiously to claims made by a Turkish journalist about former Arsenal and Real Madrid star Mesut Ozil.

Midfielder Ozil has not played forFenerbahce since January 19, missing their last seven games in all competitions.

Broadcaster Volkan Demir had suggested on TVchannel A Spor that 33-year-old Ozil had gone on strike after not receiving his full salary.

But theTurkish Super Lig club refuted this in a strongly-worded statement.

Fenerbahce maintain that Ozil has missed their last seven games due to a back injury.

Mesut Ozil has not played for Fenerbahce since January 19

IMAGO/Seskim Photo

The club's statement read: "The news that Mesut Ozil did not play because his debts from the club were not paid have nothing to do with the facts.

"As we have often experienced, this kind of fake news that is created completely haphazardly without being confirmed by any official from our club is beyond our tolerance limit.

"Despite the heavy economic conditions at Fenerbahce, payments have been made on time until now.

"We invite Volkan Demir, who voiced this news, to correct his comment and apologize. Otherwise, we would like to point out that our club will not be able to take part in any organization or facility it hosts."

Fenerbahce do have well-documented financial problems, which have become worse as a result of the COVID pandemic.

They are currently operating under restrictions due toUEFA's Financial Fair Play rules and in debt by over 312m, according to the Daily Mail.

Things on the pitch are not great either.

The 19-time Turkish champions have not finished inside the top two since 2018 and are currently 20 points off the top this season.

Read this article:

Fenerbahce Hit Out At "Fake News" As Club Insist Mesut Ozil Is Injured And Not On Strike - Sports Illustrated

New Delhi: WhatsApp is one of the most popular instant messaging platform in India, though on the lopside the platform is also widely used to spread fake news and misinformation.

It is in this context that the Meta owned company has several fact-checking tools that helps users from differentiating fake news from real news. WhatsApp has 10 fact-checking tipline for Indian users which will play a vital role in cross-checking facts and truths behind viral messages amid the ongoing elections in the country. (Also read: GTA 5 new-gen version releasing on March 15, check India price for PS5, Xbox)

Users can use the following tiplines for users to verify information or news on WhatsApp

-AFP +91 95999 73984-Boom +91 77009-06111 / +91 77009-06588-Fact Crescendo +91 90490 53770-Factly +91 92470 52470-India Today +91 7370-007000-Newschecker +91 99994 99044-Newsmobile +91 11 7127 9799-Quint Webqoof +91 96436 51818-The Healthy Indian Project +91 85078 85079-Vishvas News +91 92052 70923 / +91 95992 99372

These tiplines can tell you the authenticity of a certain new, misleading content, photos, videos, and even voice recordings. The facility is available in English and 11 Indian languages.

Live TV

#mute

See the original post:

How to verify fake news on WhatsApp? Check out these 10 numbers to seek information - Zee News

CBSE 12th term 1 result soon at cbseresults.nic.in

Image credit: shutterstock.com

CBSE 12th Term 1 Result 2021: A notice regarding the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) class 12 term 1 exam result is going viral on social media. The CBSE termed the notice as fake, sharing the photo on micro-blogging site Twitter to warn students and concerned authorities. "CBSE Class 12 results will be announced today at 2 PM," the fake notice mentioned. CBSE 12th Term 1 Result 2021 LIVE Register here for CBSE term 1 result, 10th, 12th Board Exams 2022 date sheets, syllabus, questions papers, preparation tips, and more

Recommended: Start your JEE/NEET Preparation with AI-Based Personalized Coaching, Take a Free trial today Start now

Students Liked: CBSE Class 12th Previous Year Sample Papers with Solutions.Download Free!

Don't Miss: How to prepare for JEE Main along with Board Exams.Grab it Free!

#cbseforstudents #Exams #Fake #CBSEFake News Alert pic.twitter.com/d4HMDOibeH

A CBSE official earlier told Careers360, the Class 12 term 1 results are expected by Friday, and Class 10 results will be announced after that. The students can check the term 1 class 10 and 12 results on the official websites- cbse.gov.in, cbseresults.nic.in, once released. CBSE term 1 result will also be available on the DigiLocker app and digilocker.gov.in.

By submitting details, you are registering on Careers360

To download the CBSE class 12 term 1 result 2022, the students need to visit the official website- cbseresults.nic.in. Click on the link for Senior Secondary (Class 12) term 1 result 2021-22. Login with roll number and school number. Download your mark sheet and take a printout.

Over 36 lakh students appeared in the term 1 10th, 12th exams which were held in November-December. The term 2 exam will be held from April 26. In term-2 exams, students will answer both objective and subjective type questions.

Students should note that the board will not announce term 1 results as pass or fail or essential repeat. The final result will be published after term 2 exams. Meanwhile, the board is also expected to release the date sheets for term 2 board exams soon.

Read the original here:

CBSE 12th Term 1 Result 2021 Today? Fake News Alert Issued By CBSE - NDTV

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been met with global outrage and has sparked anti-war protests around the world. Dissenting voices are normally kept pretty quiet in President Putins Russia but numerous large-scale protests have emerged in the last two weeks in opposition to the war in Ukraine.

OVD-Info, an independent human rights media project, estimate that around 13,000 protestors have been arrested for participating in demonstrations across more than 140 Russian cities since the invasion began on 24 February.

There have been numerous reports of excessive force being used against protestors and the use of stun guns and truncheons to disperse those gathered. As is common in Russia, there have been heavy fines and serious charges for those involved in the protests.

Under Putin the Russia state has wielded a huge amount of control to supress the activities of protesters and that effort has been intensified in the past year. In early 2021 there was significant public supportfor Alexey Navalny, the politician and most vocal opponent of Putin in Russian society.

In the aftermath of those protests Navalnys organisations were designated as extremist groups and removed from the formal political landscape. Navalny himself was imprisoned, where he remains today, and new rules governing social media expression were introduced.

Even in the past week the Kremlin has approved new laws which punish civilians who spread fake news, meaning anything that contradicts the official account of events. On 4 March the Duma adopted legislation outlawing the distribution of "false information about the activities of the armed forces of the Russian Federation."

Anyone found guilty of doing so faced a jail sentence of up to 15 years and a fine worth up to 10,000. Statista found that in 2021 the average annual salary in Russia was around $9,200.

These harsh punishments for those involved do appear to be having the desired effect and preventing people from attending the public gatherings. Anastasia, a Moscow-based civil rights activist, spoke to DW about the declining numbers at protests and the impact that the tough laws are having on the cause.

"It was a catastrophe," she said of the latest demonstration at Pushkin Square. "I have never seen such a feeble protest in Moscow."

"Moscow controls a powerful security apparatus, and Russians are scared to lose their jobs now that sanctions have been imposed," she added. There are few like me.

Link:

How many protesters have been arrested in Russia? How are people avoiding arrest? - AS USA

Background reading on the state of disinformation in the United States. Many of these appeared around the time of the 2016 election, and we've included other more recent reports as well.

Fake news and the spread of misinformationFrom the Shorenstein Center at the Harvard Kennedy School, links to peer-reviewed articles.

NiemanReports: Election '16: Lessons for JournalismFrom the Nieman Foundation at Harvard; several articles on fake news and news literacy

Evaluating Information: The Cornerstone of Civic Online ReasoningStanford University study on high school and college students' (lack of) news literacy

Lies, Damn Lies and Viral Content: How News Websites Spread (and Debunk) Online Rumors, Unverified Claims and MisinformationReport from Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University

The Science of Fake NewsScience, March 9 2018 ($)Multi-author article on the science behind why disinformation campaigns are effective. Unfortunately, this is behind a paywall; the link will work for Harvard affiliates.

Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics(2018, Oxford University Press)A book from the Berkman Klein Center on media coverage of the 2016 US Presidential election; the online version is free of charge.

The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organized Social Media ManipulationUniversity of Oxford report on the use of disinformation campaigns by national governments.

A Guide to Anti-Misinformation Efforts Around the World2018 report on stepscountries around the world are taking to combat disinformation campaigns.

Disinformation and the 2020 ElectionOne in a series of report from NYU's Stern Center on Business and Human Rights, on the role of social media in the 2020 election.

Read more from the original source:

Home - "Fake News", Disinformation, and Propaganda ...

Fake news, or fabricated content deceptively presented as real news, has garnered a lot of interest since the U.S. presidential election last fall.

Although hardly a new phenomenon, the global nature of the web-based information environment allows purveyors of all sorts of falsehoods and misinformation to make an international impact. As a result, we talk of fake news and its impact not only in the United States, but also in France, Italy and Germany.

Even though the rise of fake news in recent months is undeniable, its impact is a different story. Many argue that fake news, often highly partisan, helped Donald Trump get elected. There was certainly evidence of fake news stories getting a lot of traction on social media, at times even outperforming actual news stories.

However, a closer analysis shows even the most widely circulated fake news stories were seen by only a small fraction of Americans. And the persuasive effects of these stories have not been tested.

Its likely that they were shared primarily as a way to signal support for either candidate, and not as evidence of news consumers actually believing the content of the story. This raises questions about whether fake news has any real impact at all and whether we, as a society, should be worried about it.

The real impact of the growing interest in fake news has been the realization that the public might not be well-equipped to separate quality information from false information. In fact, a majority of Americans are confident that they can spot fake news. When Buzzfeed surveyed American high schoolers, they too were confident they could spot, and ignore, fake news online. The reality, however, is that it might be more difficult than people think.

I began to test that notion recently in a study I conducted on about 700 undergraduate students at the University of British Columbia.

The design was simple. I showed students a variety of screenshots of actual news website banners ranging from established news sources like the the Globe and Mail, more partisan sources like Fox News and the Huffington Post, online aggregators like Yahoo! News and social media outlets like Upworthy and asked them to rate their legitimacy on a scale of zero to 100.

I also included actual screenshots of fake news websites, some of which gained prominence during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. One of these fake news sources was a website called ABCnews.com.co, which is made to look like ABC News, and featured some false content that gained prominence after it was retweeted by Eric Trump. The others were the Boston Tribune and World True News.

The findings are troubling. Even though the sample group was mostly composed of politically sophisticated and engaged news consumers (by their own admission), the respondents attributed more legitimacy to fake news outlets like ABCnews.com.co or the Boston Tribune than to Yahoo! News, an actual news organization.

Although these results are preliminary and part of a larger study, they are consistent with other research: people, and especially young people, have a hard time separating good sources of information from questionable ones or determining whether a photograph is authentic or fabricated.

Furthermore, ideology seems to impact the assessment of news legitimacy to a troubling degree. Left-leaning students see no difference between an extremist source like Breitbart and Fox News, which, in addition to right-wing partisan commentary, also features news reporting that adheres to standard journalistic norms.

As a result, something that looks and feels real, like the Boston Tribune, is given more legitimacy than an actual news source that students are familiar with, but dislike for ideological reasons. In fact, something that looks and feels fake, like World True News, is given more legitimacy than a real news outlet.

All of this suggests that even though we have been fairly lucky in Canada to avoid the spread of fake news which has plagued recent elections in other developed nations, it doesnt mean were immune to the phenomenon. In many ways, the foundation has been already laid.

According to research done by my colleague, Eric Merkley, Canadians are increasingly polarized along ideological lines, and this affective polarization tends to trigger motivated reasoning an unconscious, biased way of processing information which makes even smart people believe in falsehoods that support their ideological and partisan predispositions.

Additionally, the fragmentation and digitization of the news media landscape is not an American phenomenon, but a global one. According to the most recent study, nearly 80 per cent of Canadians get their news online, and nearly 50 per cent get news on social media, a platform that greatly contributed to the spread of misinformation in the United States. Taken together, the conditions are ripe for fake news to take off in Canada.

Sadly, theres no easy fix to the problem. Tweaking algorithms something Facebook and Google are trying to do can help, but the real solution must come from the news consumers. They need to be more skeptical and better-equipped to rate the quality of information that they encounter.

A crucial part of that strategy should involve media literacy training and equipping news consumers with tools that will allow them to gauge the legitimacy of the news source, but also become aware of their own cognitive biases.

The problem will only get worse without proper action as more people get their news online and politics becomes more tribal and polarized.

Go here to read the rest:

The real consequences of fake news - The Conversation

Autism rates through the roofwhy doesnt the Obama administration do something about doctor-inflicted autism. We lose nothing to try.

9:19 AM - 22 Oct 2012

Starting in 2012, Mr. Trump has repeatedly expressed his personal belief that autism is linked to childhood vaccinations, saying it in interviews, on Twitter, and even during a Republican debate.

On the show Fox & Friends in April 2012, Mr. Trump was asked about the rising number of children with autism diagnoses and said, I have a theory and its a theory that some people believe in, and thats the vaccinations. Later in the segment, one host noted most doctors disagree and that studies do not show a link, which Mr. Trump acknowledged, adding, Its also very controversial to even say, but I couldnt care less. He said he had seen changes in children firsthand to support his belief.

Plenty of studies, including a recent one that involved almost 100,000 children, have shown there is no scientific evidence linking vaccinations to autism, and that there is no benefit to delaying vaccinations. Instead, children who are not vaccinated on the regular schedule can be at risk for infectious diseases for a longer period. One doctor told Scientific American that misinformation on the internet often frightens parents away from following the vaccination schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the only one endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. In 2015, a measles outbreak in California, which started at Disneyland, was partly attributed to diseases spread by children who were not vaccinated.

In October 2012, Mr. Trump took to Twitter to ask why President Obamas administration was not intervening. He then wrote in March 2014, If I were President I would push for proper vaccinations but would not allow one time massive shots that a small child cannot take - AUTISM.

View original post here:

10 Times Trump Spread Fake News - The New York Times

Americas fake news problem is getting worse, not better.

According to an analysis released by NewsGuard and first reported by Axioss Sara Fischer on Tuesday, websites that provide unreliable news increased their share of social media interactions this year. In 2019, 8 percent of engagement with the 100 top-performing news sources on social media was dubious. In 2020, that number more than doubled to 17 percent.

NewsGuard, which rates news websites according to reliability, found that people are engaging in a lot more news this year than they were last year. Engagement with the top 100 US news sources (meaning likes, shares, and comments on Facebook and Twitter) went from 8.6 billion reactions to 16.3 billion reactions between 2019 and 2020. That makes sense given, well, everything that has happened in 2020. There has been a lot of news, and due to pandemic-related factors such as unemployment and lockdowns, people have a lot of time on their hands to read stuff online.

But an increasing amount of the news people are seeing is problematic, inaccurate, or suspicious. And thats something to worry about. The analysis found that the Daily Wire, the outlet founded by right-wing commentator Ben Shapiro, saw 2.5 times more interactions this year than last.

The blossoming of false and unreliable news on the internet is a cultural, political, and technological phenomenon thats hard to get your head around, let alone tackle. Conspiracy theories, misinformation, and disinformation run rampant on the internet, and its often difficult for people to tell what is true and whats not. Social media companies are not exactly doing a bang-up job of addressing the problem, either.

Right-wing content, in particular, thrives on platforms such as Facebook. But just because someone sees certain content doesnt necessarily mean they are particularly influenced by it, and figuring out just how powerful certain messages are can be complicated. Over the summer, Kevin Roose at the New York Times reported on what he described as a parallel media universe of super-conservative content on Facebook, noting that right-leaning pages and posts on the platform consistently get more interactions and shares than more liberal and mainstream ones. (Though just because someone likes a news post doesnt mean they actually read it.)

As Recodes Rebecca Heilweil pointed out at the time, its hard to know whats happening on Facebook just by engagement:

Theres now a running debate among academics, analytics experts, and observers like Roose around what we know about whats happening on Facebook and why. Dartmouth political scientist Brendan Nyhan recently argued that likes, comments, and shares are just a small part of what people actually see on Facebook, and that its difficult to draw conclusions from these interactions alone or to know what they might mean for an election.

Still, the trend is concerning. Social media is making political polarization worse in America, and its often the case that people no longer agree on even basic facts. What people consume shapes what they see basically, someone clicks on a certain article and algorithms start to predict what else they might like in alignment with that. And the further down the rabbit hole they go, the more they begin to seek out that media, often winding up in an information bubble.

Republicans have spent years complaining that social media companies are biased against them and that their content is being censored and removed. President Donald Trump has often lashed out against tech companies with unfounded claims of bias. He and his administration have also attempted to undercut and scrap Section 230, a law that basically says social media companies are allowed to police their platforms however they want and arent liable for the content third parties post on them. (Recodes Sara Morrison has a full explainer on Section 230.)

Rather than bias toward a certain political leaning, social media algorithms are often biased toward outrage they push content that people have an emotional reaction to and are likely to engage with. The NewsGuard data and other research shows that people are increasingly being drawn to unreliable content and often, unreliable content that has a conservative bent. And that content can influence all sorts of attitudes and cause confusion on even basic facts.

The New York Times recently took a look at Georgia and how misinformation and unreliable news is playing a role in the US Senate runoffs there. A conservative local news network called Star News Group announced it would launch the Georgia Star in November, and NewsGuards analysis found that the website has published misleading information about the presidential election and the Senate races. One story making false claims about Georgias presidential election results reached up to 650,000 people on Facebook.

Combating fake and misleading news would require efforts from multiple stakeholders. Yet Facebook recently rolled back changes to its algorithm that would promote news from reliable sources. Given the pace at which the problem is growing, the matter is likely to worsen without intervention.

Read more:

Americas growing fake news problem on social media, in ...

Disinformation has become a prominent, even dominant component of every political crisis. Fabricated images, AI bot, and troll farms make the headlines today and struggling to understand disinformations impacts has become an

Disinformation has become a prominent, even dominant component of every political crisis. Fabricated images, AI bots, and troll farms constantly make headlines today. The struggle to understand disinformations impacts has become an essential topic of inquiry.

From polling, data research or scientific analysis, here are some of the most important recent studies about disinformation.

1) Remember the fake news campaign that brought disinformation into the mainstream discussion? Yes, that one: Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections. This research from 2018 by Oxford Universitys Computational Propaganda Project and Graphika, a leading computer network analysis firm, for the United States Senate was, at the time, the most comprehensive analysis of Russian meddling. The researchers analyzed millions of posts and reactions online and determined how the notorious troll farm, the Kremlin-linked Internet Research Agency, tailored different messages to galvanize individual Trump supporters and discourage non-supporters from casting votes at all. The focus had been on Facebook and Twitter; these researchers unraveled how the Internet Research Agency used YouTube in their campaign and also uncovered their sloppiness, like cases of them paying for political ads with Russian rubles.

2) How were scientists in different disciplines discussing fake news before disinformation went literally everywhere? In 2018, as fake news became a catch-all buzz term, a group of 16 political scientists, psychologists, computer scientists, media experts, historians, and journalists led by Harvard professors David Lazer and Matthew Baum teamed up to publish a paper about the science of fake news, looking at how it works on an individual and societal level.

3) In 2020 EU DisinfoLab published Indian Chronicles, an exhaustive research project uncovering a 15-year long international pro-India and anti-Pakistan disinformation campaign run by the New Delhi-based Srivastava Group, mainly targeting the UN and EU. Fake and resurrected think tanks and NGOs lobbied the European Parliament, spoke at sessions, and convinced parliamentarians to write pro-India and anti-Pakistan op-eds for over 750 of their fake media outlets across 119 countries. Reportedly, ANI, South Asias leading news agency, played a major role in spreading content from these websites, giving them credibility. Srivastava Group was also the organizer of controversial trips to Kashmir in 2019, when a couple dozen far-right European Parliamentarians visited the Indian-controlled disputed regions in Kashmir.

4) In 2020 QAnon, a conspiracy theory about how a global child trafficking ring is ruling the world, conquered every other outlandish conspiracy theory and went global. It infiltrated politics, public health, yoga groups, the hip-hop scene and disrupted the personal lives of thousands of people in the U.S. and abroad. Huge numbers of disinformation stories in the past year had something to do with QAnon, and this poll by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Interfaith Youth Core published last May made clear just how far QAnon has traveled. In the U.S. alone, 30 million people believe at least some QAnon tenets, ranking QAnon next to major religions.

5) Last spring, amid Covid-19 vaccine rollouts, an international non-profit research organization, The Center for Countering Digital Hate, investigated Twitter, Facebook and Instagram for harmful, Covid-19 related disinformation. They uncovered the Disinformation Dozen the influencers who accounted for 65% of Covid-19 related misinformation online. The list includes notorious anti-vaccine campaigners like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., alternative medicine practitioners like Christiane Northrup and the leading pseudoscientific influencer-physician Joseph Mercola. Mercola, who has been profiting from his misinformation, also made our list of top business owners profiting off bad science. He will continue to express his professional opinions and defend his freedom of speech, his representative told Coda when approached for a comment.

View post:

These 5 disinformation studies changed the way we think about fake news - Coda Story