Category Archives: Evolution

Donald Trump has been tweeting about Kristen Stewart since 2012, despite not knowing her. But now that he's president, Stewart, who isn't usually one to take political positions, addressed him directly in her Saturday Night Live monologue, saying that if he didn't like her seven years ago, then he will like her even less now, because, as she says, "I'm so gay, dude."

The Twilight actress hasn't always been so open about her sexuality. This is the first time she's publicly embraced any label. Queer rumors followed the actress back since she was dating her Twilight costar, Robert Pattinson, the actor who Stewart claims Trump is obsessed with. Stewart talked about her sexuality for the first time in 2015, when she appeared on the September cover of Nylon. She told the magazine, "Google me, I'm not hiding," when asked if she is queer. At the time, photos of her and her then-girlfriend, Alicia Cargile, were all over the internet.

That phrase, "Google me, I'm not hiding," took on special meaning for Stewart, who later admitted that she purposely wanted the paparazzi to take photos of her with Soko, a French pop star Stewart dated after she and Cargile broke up, because that was a way for her to be out without having to say it. "That's really important to me," she told Varietyabout having her young fans see her holding hands with or kissing another woman. "As much as I want to protect myself, it's not about hiding. As soon as you start throwing up so many walls, you cannot see over them yourself, so you just start isolating in a way that's not honest."

In the same interview with Variety in 2016, the actress opened up and said that when she was dating men, she never talked about her relationships to anyone. She said, at the time, that she felt the same about dating women. "I'm not hiding shit," she told the magazine. "I'm very obviously..." she said, before trailing off without saying the word "gay" or "queer."

But that changed months later, when she did an interview with T, the New York Times style magazine. She spoke about Cargile, with whom she had often been photographed. "Look how cute she is," she told the publication, while showing photos of the two together from a private Instagram account. "I love her so much," she said. Stewart got back together with Cargile after breaking up with Soko.

Stewart's position about not speaking publicly about her relationships changed when she began dating women because "it seemed like there was an opportunity to represent something really positive," Stewart told the Times. While the actress was known for usually keeping mum about her personal life, she didn't want to seem homophobic by not speaking about it. "I still want to protect my personal life, but I don't want to seem like I'm protecting the idea, so that does sort of feel like I owe something to people."

While promoting her movie Equals, Stewart was asked about the process of opening up the media about her relationships with women. "I've discovered a way to live my life and not feel like I'm hiding at all," she told the Los Angeles Times. "And I think that's pretty apparent for anyone who cares not that everyone does. But I think that if you had been tracking it in any way, it's more apparent that I'm more relaxed than I used to be."

Stewart's fans have definitely been tracking it. It's because when Stewart opens up about being queer, it lets her fans, especially her queer fans, know that there's no need to hide your sexuality, even when you have a president who reportedly isconsidering signing an anti-LGBT "religious freedom" order that would make it legal to discriminate against LGBT people.

Watch Stewart's Saturday Night Live monologue below.

Read the original post:

The Queer Evolution of Kristen Stewart - Advocate.com

In Insectivorous Plants, Sir Charles Darwin pondered carnivorous plants.They live in habitats poor in nutrients, mostly on nitrogen and phosphorous, and have compensated this lack with the ability to digest animals such as insects and other arthropods.

Adapting and surviving with a carnivorous diet in nutrient-poor soils is an evolutionary process that some evolutionary unrelated species have been going through, repeatedly and independently, from the same set of genes and proteins, according to a new study in Nature Ecology&Evolution.

All plants are photosynthetic organisms, that is, they turn transform the inorganic matter of the environment into organic molecules (glucose). To complete the lack of nutrients of some soils, carnivorous plants can catch and absorb nutrients from a prey, thanks to an exclusively biological mechanism. Carnivorous plants are a clear example of convergent evolution, probably due the heavy biological restrictions imposed by extreme nutrient-poor ecosystems. That this convergence was accompanied by a parallel molecular evolution in digestive enzymes makes this system an interesting example from the perspective of the study of the evolutionary process.

According to this study, natural selection has taken similar evolutionary routes so that plants can feed from other animals to complete their diets. Credit: Universidad de Barcelona

The authors sequenced the genome of the pitcher plant (Cephalotus follicularis), an Australian species that can be identified for its insectivorous leaves pit-fall traps that catch insects - very different from the other leaves. The genome of this species, the second carnivorous plant with the complete genome sequenced after Utricularia gibba, is relatively large, and consists of 1.6 Gb, which is almost half of the human genome. The researchers have identified more than 36,000 genes.

According to the results, leaves that catch insects have gained new enzymatic functions: basic chitinase, which breaks down chitin (main component of insects exoskeleton), and purple acid phosphatase which releases phosphate groups from molecules, and it contributes to the mobilization of the preys phosphate, says professor Julio Rozas, who leads the Evolutionary Genomics and Bioinformatics research group at the University of Barcelona.

"In the study, we have stated that genes originally involved in the defence against certain diseases or the response to biotic and abiotic stress- have acquired new functions (co-option) related to the ability of feeding from animals. This is the case, for instance, of a specific set of proteins that evolved to act as digestive enzymes, said Pablo Librado, also from University of Barcelona. The results of co-option, regarding both the digestive enzymes and the amino acid changes seen in these enzymes, show that evolution has acted on a limited number of evolutionary routes in the adaptive transition to the carnivorous diet.

Citation: K. Fukushima, X. Fang, D. Alvarez-Ponce, H. Cai, L. Carretero-Paulet, C. Chen, T. Chang, K. M. Farr, T. Fujita, Y. Hiwatashi, Y. Hoshi, T. Imai, M. Kasahara, P. Librado, L. Mao, H. Mori, T. Nishiyama, M. Nozawa, G. Plfalvi, S. T. Pollard, J. Rozas, A. Snchez-Gracia, D. Sankoff, T. F. Shibata, S. Shigenobu, N. Sumikawa, T. Uzawa, M. Xie, C. Zheng, D. D. Pollock, V. A. Albert, S. Li, M. Hasebe, 'The pitcher plant Cephalotus genome reveals genetic changes associated with carnivory', Nature Ecology & Evolution, Feb 2017

Original post:

Convergent Evolution: Why Some Plants Became Carnivorous - Science 2.0

The original Psychonauts is the definition of a cult-classic. Tim Schafer spent over a decade at LucasArts making comedicadventure games like Grim Fandango, Day of the Tentacle, and The Secret of Monkey Island. Eventually, he left LucasArts to found his own game studio, Double Fine Productions, and their first game was a third-person platforming adventure about a secret society ofpsychic spies. Fans loved it, critics adored it, and as is the case sometimes, it just didnt sell well.

Fast forward severalyears after a handful of re-releases of the original and Psychonauts 2 is officially happeningfollowing the studios raise of over $3.8 million thanks to the democratic power of crowdfunding.Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin then, alternatively, is a VR-exclusive first-person adventure puzzle game in which you embark on a rescue mission for the leader of the Psychonauts himself. The entire 3-4 hour adventure begins right where the original game leaves off and leads directly into the numbered sequel set to release next year in 2018.

Last week I visited Double Fines San Francisco office and had the chance to play through the first 45 minutes of the game and chat with Project Lead,Chad Dawson. He explained that when Schafer had first theorized the idea for Psychonauts 2, this interim story we find here wasnt factored in at all. The plan before was to simply reference the mission you embark on with your team in the sequel, but just leave it as a quickly referenced unplayable flashback. The prospect ofSonys PlayStation VR (PSVR) quickly changed that.

After playing the game for an extended amount of time, I can see why. When I originally got my hands on an abbreviated demo at E3 and was pleased with the quality of the presentation and the appearance of Double Fines trademark humor, but was unsure how well it could translate to an entire adventure. Thankfully the mechanics seem more than capable.

Dawson explained that what I was playing was essentially a final build of the game thats already passed certification by Sony. After donning a PSVR headset, I selected the New Game option from the main menu and got loaded into the mind of Raz, the main character of the series and primary protagonist in each of the franchises games. As a psychic spy, he has a litany of special mind powers.

For starters, his clairvoyance allows him to jump into the minds of other people, seeing things through their eyes and reading their thoughts. Telekinesis lets him lift and move objects, he can push things too, and even set items on fire as well. The games opening moments serve as a tutorial of sorts, as it slowly introduces new powers and mechanics.

Eventually Im able to connect to the mind of the captured Psychonauts leader,Truman Zanotto, while he is being held captive in a secret enemy base. This is where the real game starts. In a traditional point and click adventure game, youd explore the environment and search for clues about what to do next, but in this new Psychonauts game, it feels like a more organic puzzle solving adventure. I can look around my surroundings using my actual head and leap into the minds of guards standing around.

After taking over the minds of others, I can see the room from new perspectives, looking for clues and items to help me figure out where the leaders being kept. All in all, thats what the game boils down to. Youll be placed in a tricky situation, tasked with finding out what to do next using your surroundings for clues, and listening to exposition and details explained through dialogue. And even though in real life I was sitting in a meeting room surrounded by other people while I played, I couldnt help but chuckle to myself at the jokes and witty humor throughout.

Dawson also explained the myriad challenges that a game like Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin presented. Since the team had never worked on a piece of VR content before, they started to realize that traditional movement caused some sickness in people, which is part of why the clairvoyance mechanic is used to teleport around levels by traveling through the minds of others. Since PSVR performs best as a 180-degree device, every time a player teleports there needs to be at least one other person in the line of sight directly in front of you so that you can move again.

This changed the way environments were designed and forced the studio to think about levels differently. An old-school adventure game or a modern interpretation of the genre like Double Fines Broken Age might simply display 2D illustrated scenes that you can move around and click on, but that doesnt work in VR.

Some games like Obduction [Review: 8/10] adapt immersive, puzzle-based adventure games into VR with little changes, but Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin feels like a more robust re-imagining of the genre. Its designed from the ground up with VR in mind and the mere presence of psychic puzzles truly make you feel like the headset is a portal into the minds of the games characters. Its about as clever and clean of a genre/platform combination you could hope for and feels right at home.

You wont have much longer to wait until you can get your hands on it either, asPsychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin is set to release for PSVR this February 21st. Currently there are no plans for a Rift or Vive version, although perhaps that will come at a later time.

Are you a Psychonauts fan? Do you plan on getting this when it releases in a couple of weeks? Let us know in the comments down below!

Tagged with: double fine, playstation, ps4, PSVR, Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin

See more here:

Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin Feels Like an Evolution of Double Fine's Adventure Game Roots - UploadVR

For a recent episode of the Skift Podcast, we looked at the experiences of travelers with disabilities. For many companies, accommodating customers with disabilities is a legal obligation, but the companies that do more are better satisfying their customers and capturing this sizable market share according to the Open Doors Organization, adults with disabilities in the U.S. spend $17.3 billion a year on leisure and business travel.Over the two years before the study, 26 million adults with disabilities took 73 million trips.

Our guests includedPeter Slatin, founder and president of Slatin Group, which provides education and training to help businesses including many in travel improve interactions with clients who have disabilities. His program Elements of Service: Serving Guests with Disabilities also recently went online through the American Hotel and Lodging Educational Institute.

Also with us via Skype was Brett Heising, CEO of brettapproved.com, a travel and entertainment review site for users with physical disabilities or mobility impairment. Through a travel agency partnership, the site also provides bookings and trip coordination.

They joined Skift podcast host Hannah Sampson and reporter Andrew Sheivachman.

Here are five takeaways from the conversation:

Hotels and state tourism boards need to catch up to museums and theaters.

In Slatins view, entertainment businesses like museums and theaters have done a more comprehensive job of welcoming customers with disabilities than hotels and state tourism boards.

There is a lot of lip service. Oh yes, we want you to be our customer, but we dont really want to do anything other than what we were told we had to do and we really didnt like doing that because it costs us money, explained Slatin. That breeds a head-in-the-sand mentality thats going to eventually bite the industry in the wrong place.

Theres things being done at the state tourism level, but we do have a long way to go, added Heising.

Meetings and events are big business for this demographic.

There are many big gatherings around the country for people with disabilities, and when these events happen, hotels are often unprepared to serve a high number of customers with disabilities at once. That potentially translates to lost income.

I go every year to the largest organization of people with vision impairments. The National Federation of the Blind has its annual meeting sometime usually in July, said Slatin. You have 3,000 people, many of whom are wheelchair users, many of whom are hearing impaired or hard of hearing, as well as blind. There are a lot of dogs, there are a lot of people, and there are a lot of able-bodied people as well, but thats a big spend in that theyre renting a couple thousand rooms, theyre eating all over the place and thats just one group.

Travelers with disabilities may prefer to book direct.

Since logistical problems are likely to arise at some point during a trip, many travelers with disabilities prefer to cut out the middleman, i.e. the online travel agency, and book directly with the hotel. This way, if the room ends up not being accessible, the traveler can more easily address that issue with hotel management.

I always book directly with the hotel because if there is a problem, theyre going to be able to resolve it much quicker, as opposed to saying, Oh, you booked through OTA X, give them a call. Like all consumers, I want a speedy resolution to my challenge, said Heising.

Now, of course, I cant read those screens and those [OTA] sites are really not accessible, although the OTAs will say they are, said Slatin, who deals with vision impairment. [The OTAs] have phone numbers you can call, but those are sales people and they work really hard to sell you something you have to push back really hard. It becomes kind of an unpleasant interaction, so I then will turn to a sighted colleague or Ill just start calling some hotels.

Hoteliers should make Universal Design a higher priority for future properties.

First, a definition of this term: Universal Design, as I understand it, is just a physical design of something. It could be a hotel room or a can opener, that works for everybody. That has the masses in mind, explained Heising.

Disability takes many different forms, so moving forward, hotels might find that it pays off to take this wide-ranging look at how a room should function, to serve as many people as possible.

Why not make sure that they follow the seven tenets of Universal Design and make sure that everybody can use them? Heres a wacky idea: How about a hundred-room hotel with a hundred roll-in showers? Isnt that nuts? I mean, how cool would that be? said Heising.

I dont see any silver bullet. I dont see any earthquake. I see incremental change, but well get to the point where we will notice the separation less and less, said Slatin.

Disability is far more prevalent than many travel leaders realize.

Heising points out that while many travelers wont suffer from blindness in their younger years, for example, a person will probably develop some type of disability as they age and will require appropriate services.

You might not need brettapproved today, but if you live long enough, youre going to need brettapproved, or youre going to go someplace really cool and its not going to matter. Right? said Heising.

Start listening to The Skift Podcast, today. Subscribe viaiTunes,SoundcloudorRSS.

Go here to see the original:

The Evolution of Accessible Travel: 5 Podcast Takeaways - Skift

GENES that increase an individuals reproductive output will be preserved and spread from generation to generation. That is the process of evolution by natural selection. More subtly, though, in species that have the sorts of learnable, and thus transmissible, behaviour patterns known as culture, cultural changes that promote successful reproduction are also likely to spread. This sort of cultural evolution is less studied than the genetic variety, but perhaps that should change, for a paper published this week in Nature Ecology and Evolution, by Janet Howard and Mhairi Gibson of the University of Bristol, in England, suggests understanding it better may help to wipe out a particularly unpleasant practice, that of female genital mutilation.

FGM, as it is known for short, involves cutting or removing part or all of a females external genitaliausually when she is a girl or just entering puberty. Unlike male circumcision, which at least curbs the transmission of HIV, the AIDS-causing virus, FGM brings no medical benefit whatsoever. Indeed, it often does harm. Besides psychological damage and the inevitable risk that is associated with any sort of surgery (especially when not conducted in clinical conditions), FGM can cause subsequent obstetric complications and put a woman at risk of future infections. All these seem like good reasons why it would harm reproductive output and thus be disfavoured by evolution, whether biological or cultural. Yet the practice persists, particularly in parts of Africa and among migrant populations originating in these places. Ms Howard and Dr Gibson wanted to understand why.

To do so they drew on data from five national health surveys carried out in west Africa (specifically, Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, Mali and Senegal) over the past ten years. These provided data on the FGM-statusmutilated or otherwiseof more than 60,000 women from 47 ethnic groups. That enabled Ms Howard and Dr Gibson to establish the prevalence rates of mutilation in each of these groups, and to search for explanations of any variation.

They first established formally what common sense would suggest is truethat the daughters of a mother belonging to an ethnic group where the practice is widespread are, themselves, more likely to have undergone mutilation than those of a mother not belonging to such a group. But there was more to the pattern of those results than mere correlation. The average rates of mutilation in the groups the researchers looked at tended to cluster towards the ends of the distribution, near either 0% or 100%, rather than being spread evenly along it.

In the argot of statistics, then, the distribution is U-shaped. This suggests something is pushing behaviour patterns away from the middle and towards the extremes. What that something might be is in turn suggested by the two researchers second finding: the consequences of mutilation for a womans reproductive output.

For convenience, Ms Howard and Dr Gibson defined a womans reproductive output as the number of her children still living when she reached the age of 40. Just over 10,000 women in the five pooled surveys were over this age, and it was from these that the researchers drew their data. Their analysis showed that in ethnic groups where mutilation was common, mothers who were themselves mutilated had more children over their reproductive lifetimes than did the unmutilated. In groups where mutilation was rare, by contrast, it was the other way around. At the extremes, in groups where mutilation was almost ubiquitous or almost unheard of, the average difference amounted to a third or more of an extra child per lifetime. That is a strong evolutionary pressure to conform to the prevailing social norm, whatever it is.

What causes this difference Ms Howard and Dr Gibson cannot say for sure, but they suggest that conforming to whichever norm prevails might let a woman make a more advantageous marriage, and also give her better access to support networks, particularly of members of her own sex. Cultural evolution, in other words, is generating conformity in the same sort of way that biological evolution does when, say, the plumage of a male bird has to conform to female expectations of what a male looks like if that male is to mate successfully, even though the particular pattern of his plumage brings no other benefit.

All this does, though, offer a lever to those who are trying to eradicate female genital mutilation, for unlike genetic norms, cultural ones can be manipulated. The distributions shape suggests that, if mutilation rates in societies where FGM is now the norm could somehow be pushed below 50%, then positive feedback might continue to reduce them without further effort (though such effort could well speed things up).

One thing that is known to push in the right direction is more and better educationand not just for girls. That is desirable for reasons far wider than just the elimination of FGM, however. In a companion piece to Ms Howards and Dr Gibsons paper, Katherine Wander of Binghamton University, in New York state, offers a thought inspired directly by the new research. She wonders if fostering social connections between cut and uncut women in a community might reorganise support networks specifically in a way that reduces the advantages of mutilation.

More widely, the method Ms Howard and Dr Gibson have pioneered, of looking for unanticipated reproductive advantages that help explain the persistence of other undesirable behaviours, might be applied elsewhere. So-called honour killings would be a candidate for such a study, as would the related phenomena of daughter neglect, and the selective infanticide and selective abortion of females. On the face of things these might be expected to be bad for total reproductive output. But perhaps, as with FGM, that is not always the case. And, if it is not, such knowledge would surely help in the fight against them.

Visit link:

Cultural evolution and the mutilation of women - The Economist

Biological invasions pose major threats to biodiversity, but little is known about how evolution might alter their impacts over time.

Now, Rutgers scientists have performed the first study of how evolution unfolds after invasions change native systems.

Now, Rutgers scientists have performed the first study of how evolution unfolds after invasions change native systems.

The experimental invasions elaborate experiments designed by doctoral student Cara A. Faillace and her adviser, Professor Peter J. Morin took place in glass jars suitable for savory jam or jelly, with thousands of microscopic organisms on each side. After entering the jars uncharted territory the invaders won some battles and lost some against the natives.

Oftentimes, we know the initial impacts of invasive species but we dont know the long-term impacts if things will get better or worse, said Morin, a distinguished professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution & Natural Resources in the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences. Cara found that both things can happen, and it will depend a lot on the details of the biology of the species thats introduced and the biology of the community thats invaded.

The Rutgers scientists coauthored a study Evolution Alters the Consequences of Invasions in Experimental Communities that was published recently in Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Typically, biological invasions unfold when humans introduce exotic species either accidentally or on purpose into areas where they are not native, Faillace said. Invasive species, a subset of exotic species, usually are ecologically or economically harmful.

Rutgers doctoral candidate Cara A. Faillace in the Morin Lab.

In their study, the Rutgers researchers compared the performance of populations of resident and invading species before and after they interacted, and potentially evolved, for about 200 to 400 generations. They used two different groups of resident species consisting of aquatic bacteria, ciliates protozoans with hair-like projections called cilia and rotifers, organisms with cilia-laced mouths and retractable feet. The ciliates and rotifers were collected from Bamboo Pond in Rutgers Gardens in New Brunswick.

For the nearly two-year experiments, one species from each group was designated as an invader of the other community. One group had five ciliates and a rotifer. The other group had three different ciliates and a different rotifer.

The organisms worlds were loosely lidded 8.5-ounce jars about the size of a jelly jar. The jars contained food, vitamins, sterile water and two sterile wheat seeds for extra nutrients.

There were likely hundreds of thousands of protozoans in a microcosm, or jar, and populations turned over fairly quickly, with many chances for mutations, Morin said.

Every time an individual divides, its still alive and it takes six to 24 hours for most of these organisms to reproduce, he said.

Peter J. Morin, distinguished professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution & Natural Resources.

A couple of species were abundant in the beginning but went extinct (they could not be found in the jar) after being invaded, Faillace added.

In nature, most biological invasions are accidental, Morin said.

It took several tries to get the European starling in North America established, and that was intentional, he said. Now theyre the bane of every native bird.

Gypsy moths were brought to North America by someone who wanted to see if they could establish a silk industry using gypsy moths, Morin said. The cage they were kept in was damaged, they were released and the rest is history.

Yet many organisms, such as the emerald ash borer, which kills ash trees, get introduced accidentally through commerce, Faillace said. They include the Asian longhorned beetle, which also attacks and kills trees and likely arrived in shipping containers or pallets.

Biological invasions are especially damaging when a predator or pathogen is introduced and when native species have never encountered a predator, the scientists said.

Climate change is a major factor in biological invasions and its impact is likely increasing, Faillace said.

Presumably as climate shifts, the species that can invade will change or the ranges of species that have invaded will change, she said.

The bottom line is that we should expect to see changes in the impacts of invasive species as invaders and native species evolve over time, Morin said.

See the rest here:

How Evolution Alters Biological Invasions - ScienceBlog.com (blog)

A reconstruction of Calvapilosa, showing what this primitive mollusc most likely looked like in real life. Photograph: Jakob Vinther/Model made by Esben Horn (10tons.dk)

Lumpy, hairy and with a nail-like horny patch it sounds like a hobbits toe. In fact, its a portrait of what researchers say the common ancestor of slugs, snails and squid might have looked like.

The surmise is based on the discovery of the fossilised remains of a mollusc, thought to have lived about 480 million years ago, which has short spines all over its body and fingernail-like shell over its head which housed a radula a tongue-like structure found only in molluscs with more than 125 rows of teeth.

Believed to be a very early ancestor of a group of marine molluscs known as chitons, the discovery, scientists say, suggests that the common ancestor of all molluscs likely had a similar appearance.

I would say that our animal probably is very close to the spitting image of how the ancestor of all molluscs must have looked like 530 million years ago, said Jakob Vinther, a molecular palaeobiologist from the University of Bristol and co-author of the research published in the journal Nature.

The newly discovered animal is believed to have reached up to 12cm in length although the juvenile found in the Yale collection is less than 2cm long. Its name, Calvapilosa kroegeri, is a reference to the hairy shell that covered its head together with a nod to Bjrn Krger. The palaeontologist spotted a complete version of the fossilised creature among a drawer of recently collected Moroccan rocks at Yale University almost a decade after the first incomplete fossil was found.

We had been looking through those drawers to try and see if there were any specimens and we missed it, said Vinther. [Then Krger said] Why dont you guys use this specimen it is entirely complete, and then he pulled this thing out and it was like dude, that is totally what we needed!

The discovery also sheds light on a previously discovered fossils, revealing that a number of older creatures whose nature had been debated due to a lack of preserved details were also molluscs, due to their similarity in structure to the newly discovered creature. We could bring all these other fossils into the fold of thinking [about] molluscan evolution, said Vinther.

It also reveals that an type of early animal with two shell-like plates, known as Halkieria, was also a mollusc. Despite Halkeria being older, the authors suggest that the number of plates grew during evolution, leading to modern day chitons, which bear a row of eight plates on their back. Basically our animal sits right at the base of the branch that leads to chitons, said Vinther.

With a very early non-molluscan creature called Wiwaxia known to have had scales and spikes, the researchers go further, proposing an evolutionary path in which the common ancestor of all molluscs bore spines, a single plate, and a radula before a variety of branches emerged, eventually giving rise to molluscs as diverse as snails, clams and slugs.

Martin Smith, an invertebrate palaeontologist at the University of Durham who was not involved in the research, described the new find as exciting. This is a really important fossil, he said. Theres been a lot of discussion about the common ancestor of molluscs and of course there is such a wide diversity of body plans of molluscs today ranging from squids to snails to slugs and various other things that it is very hard to work out what their common ancestor looked like.

While it has previously been suggested that the common ancestor was shell-less, the new study, says Smith, points towards a single shell and a radula forming part of the body plan of molluscs, which have since been lost, modified or multiplied in various branches over the course of evolution. It completely transforms how we see the earliest history of molluscs and how we read the fossil record, said Smith of the new find.

But Julia Sigwart of Queens University Belfast, cautioned against such an interpretation, saying that even at 480 million years old, the newly-discovered fossil is too young to draw conclusions about what the common ancestor of all molluscs would have looked like.

This is not a particularly old fossil in the context of molluscan evolution, she said. But, she added, the fossil does show how many different forms existed through the history of molluscs over the last half billion years. Any time we find these exceptionally preserved fossils, they are very important for us to understand what the body plans looked like, because the fossils are so rare.

Read more from the original source:

Lumpy, hairy, toe-like fossil could reveal the evolution of molluscs - The Guardian

This week, Feb. 6 10, The University of Southern Mississippi will host a series of activities in honor of Charles Darwins birthday.

Many universities and institutions will be celebrating Darwin Day on Feb. 12, which is a day to promote science education and, in particular, Darwins contributions to biology. Southern Miss has extended its day-long celebration to a week. There will be a fossil hunt, lectures, video screenings, socials, a panel discussion and a keynote address through the University Forum by famous paleontologist Neil Shubin, a professor at the University of Chicago and author of Your Inner Fish.

Some of you may be offended that we are having a celebration of Darwin. In fact, in just the last two months, Ive been bombarded on Facebook by accusations of undermining the religious faith of our students by teaching a theory based on little fact with the ultimate desire of implementing a liberal agenda and atheism in our society. That is far from the truth I dont try to undermine anyones faith, Im fairly moderate politically and Im not even an atheist! I would like to challenge our students, particularly Christians who may feel that evolution has implications for their religious faith, to consider a few key points and then join us for some of the activities this week.

First, we are celebrating Darwin because his ideas have had a substantial impact in biology and even in the other sciences. His work did not just resolve the question of whether species were individually created about 6,000 years ago. Rather, his work has impacted science at many levels: Antibiotic resistance, relatedness and migration of human populations, lactose tolerance, emerging diseases and vaccine production, pesticide resistance and even forensic science and software engineering.

Evolution has impacted public policy, too, from fishing regulations to control of invasive species and conservation biology. Evolution is a broad explanation that includes more than just biology. If you reject evolution, you are also rejecting much of geology, chemistry and anthropology. In other words, you are rejecting science.

Second, there are plenty of religious reasons why one can believe in evolution in addition to the overwhelming scientific evidence in its favor. Even St. Augustine, who lived from 354 430 A.D., argued long before Darwin that a literal reading of Genesis was inappropriate. There are plenty of nonliteral texts in the Bible, and one has to determine the intent of those passages based on context and language. Given the words used and the different versions of creation, a literal reading of Genesis 1 2 is not faithful to the text itself.

For example, the Hebrew word adam can also refer to man or mankind, and the passages talk about how God speaks to the waters to bring forth certain kinds of life and speaks to the land to bring forth other kinds of life, poetically paralleling evolution. Man even comes from the dust of the ground. Many major Christian denominations today (e.g., Roman Catholics, Episcopalians, Lutherans, Methodists) have stated that evolution and Christian religious faith are not mutually exclusive. Even the man who gave us the famous quote, Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, Theodosius Dobzhansky, was actually a devout Russian Orthodox Christian.

Finally, many people even the loosely religious think that evolution is lacking (or outright wrong) because it seems improbable and reduces us humans to the outcome of chance. Many scientists have actually made this problem worse, because they use words like blind, purposeless and undirected.

Well, science doesnt deal with purpose in this sense (we dont think of stochastic events as either blind or seeing, and chance doesnt do anything), and the use of those words reflects more of the materialistic worldview of the authors. However, we do know that mutations are random with respect to natural selection; two men won the Nobel Prize for demonstrating that in 1969. A Christian, except for those who dont believe in (ontological) chance at all, need not worry: There are plenty of beautiful examples of where randomness or unpredictability at one level is deterministic at another level.

When you flip a (fair) coin, you cant be sure whether it will land on heads or tails. However, if you flip one million coins, you can be quite confident that very close to 50 percent will land on heads and 50 percent will land on tails. The opposite is true, too, where deterministic dynamics at one level lead to unpredictable behavior at another. Famous examples of this are often called chaos, where the tiniest of changes in a predictable framework result in unpredictable patterns. You may have heard of the butterfly effect; a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil can lead to a tornado in Texas.

Evolution is a fascinating subject. Dont be afraid of it ( reflexive hostility, as Kenneth Miller calls it), and be willing to challenge your (or your pastors or your parents) deep reservations about it, because you want to live a life of integrity, a life of unity, where your faith whatever it be and your knowledge fit together seamlessly. When I teach evolution, I give students a survey at the beginning of the course. One of the questions I ask is, What is the first word that comes to mind when you hear the word evolution? When I first began teaching evolution at USM about 10 years ago, common answers were controversy and religion. These days, the most common answer is dinosaurs. Thats a great sign.

For those with doubts, I have several recommendations. For a book that clearly lays out the scientific evidence for evolution but that also deals with religious (particularly Christian) issues, I highly recommend Kenneth Millers book Finding Darwins God: A Scientists Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution (1999). If youre interested in the improbability, I suggest David Bartholomews God, Chance and Purpose: Can God Have It Both Ways? (2008) and (the non- and even perhaps anti-religious) book by David Hand, The Improbability Principle: Why Coincidences, Miracles, and Rare Events Happen Every Day (2015). All of these books are available in the USM library.

Read the original post:

USM Darwin Day: 'Genesis' a parallel to evolution - The Student Printz

Ivanka Trump 'Feels Terrible' for Insensitive Gala Photo Nordstrom Drops Ivanka Trump's Line Ivanka Trumps Baby Theodore Crawls for First Time in the White House

If we could turn back time actually, we have! Ivanka Trump, the newly minted first daughter of President Donald Trump, has been in the limelight her whole life, which means we've watched her grow up. See her beauty evolution in the video above!

From a rosy-cheeked teen with a rosebud mouth (circa 1998) to a platinum-blonde student and model in the early aughts, to a sleek entrepreneur with a glamorous but understated makeup palette, the former Trump Organization VP has transformed right before our eyes.

Today, Ivanka, who first launched her eponymous brand in 2007 with fine jewelry, is now a mom of three children (with fellow real estate mogul husband Jared Kushner), but she's just as polished as ever.

"I keep my makeup minimal at the office, but that's also because I like to spend my time with my children in the mornings, and that tends to come at the expense of doing my makeup," Ivanka told Who What Wear in 2014. "That being said, I think that bright lipstick can work well, as long as the rest of your makeup is minimal."

Words she clearly lives by! Watch Ivanka's beauty transformation now.

Be a trendsetter! Sign up now for the Stylish by Us Weekly newsletters to get celeb fashion, beauty tips, and more delivered directly to your inbox.

Read more from the original source:

Ivanka Trump's Beauty Evolution, From 1998 to Today Watch - Us Weekly

Inside Higher Ed

Tracking the Evolution of Student Success Inside Higher Ed College administrators in the field of student success who feel as though their jobs are getting more hectic each day aren't imagining things, according to the EAB. Researchers at the EAB marked the Washington, D.C., based research and consulting firm ...

Visit link:

Tracking the Evolution of Student Success - Inside Higher Ed