Category Archives: Atheist

By MARK MAYNARD, Kentucky Today

SADIEVILLE, Ky. (KT) There had never been a baptism on the grounds at 168-year-old New Friendship Baptist Church until Sunday when pastor Greg Mullins dunked Shannon Adams in a water trough in a hallelujah moment.

It was in front of the church on a rock wall, Mullins said. They used to go to another church and use the baptismal, but there has never been one on the church grounds. Some clouds were moving over and I said, 'If we don't hurry and get this done, we're all going to get baptized.'''

Mullins, who has been the pastor of New Friendship for only six weeks, came over from a merger with Eagle Creek Baptist Church where he had been for 11 years.

Because of the pandemic, both churches were struggling, he said. We merged to make one.

It was the first on the church grounds for New Friendship and the first in four years overall. It wasnt the first for Mullins, who estimated hed performed more than 100 baptisms at Eagle Creek.

His new church has received a boost from becoming involved in the Gospel to Every Home. They are doing the 40 days of prayer with Mullins posting daily on a Facebook page, and also driving and praying for families in front of homes in the rural area. Hes also preaching through the sermons provided in the Gospel to Every Home kit through the Kentucky Baptist Convention.

Last week, they handed out 300 Gospel to Every Home packets - they being four women and two men, he said. We got it done faster than we thought so now were going back for more.

He said the sermons had a direct impact on the woman who gave her life to the Lord. She was invited to the church by Wil Stamper, who the pastor has been discipling. Mullins said she came for several weeks and he could tell the Lord was working on her and she finally came forward two weeks ago.

Wil is just thirsty for the Word, Mullins said. Of all the people Ive baptized and discipled, Ive never seen anyone more thirsty.

The pastor said they have prayed for homes in the rural community and then made visits where gospel conversations are taking place. He said one of the best moments was when 89-year-old member Betty Martin went with them and witnessed to someone on their front porch.

I cant believe I didnt get a picture of that, he said. It was a beautiful sight. If you still have breath, you can witness to someone.

Mullins said he loves the Gospel to Every Home initiative because it was from a pastor knocking on his door that he came to know God.

My heart is just for lost people and its the way I was saved, he said. I was a hard-core atheist. A pastor from a church down the road from me came to my door one Sunday after church and I ran him off. The next Sunday he came back again and I ran him off. The next Sunday he came to my door, I invited him in. The next Sunday I went to church and the next Sunday I was saved. He wasnt giving up. I am a believer that knocking on doors saves souls.

Original post:

Church has first baptism on its grounds in nearly 170 years - Kentucky Today

When Heidi Nicholl moved to Australia five years ago, she remembers thinking: Where is it where is humanism?

The British-born Nicholl had been drawn to humanism, a secular, values-based movement, in her 20s. In her work as a hospital ethicist she was never far from considering questions about life, death, and the reality of being human.

The types of decisions that hospital ethicists need to make are all about the reality of being human, without the admittedly comforting idea that some supernatural being would come in and fix everything, says Nicholl, who now heads the recently formed Humanists Australia.

Knowing that in the UK and America where Id lived there are humanist communities and societies, I was looking around to see what my options were for getting involved in something and finding people who live an ethical life that is evidence-based and values driven. But I didnt find anything.

When she went looking for a like-minded community in Australia, she found it was more common to hear about atheism than humanism. The former, she says, is mainly saying what youre not a person who doesnt believe in God while the latter is almost always presented as being something and for something. Nicholl says that humanists are not anti-religion and were not against religion, were actually pro-values, meaning and fulfilment.

Nicholl herself grew up with religion. As a teenager she identified very, very strongly with that charismatic evangelical message of Christianity.

She had attended church until she realised that there were other ways to spend her spare time (and also found a non-religious boyfriend). She was 28 when she won a scholarship for a secular bioethics PhD, before working in a hospital. By then she knew she was a humanist.

As the head of the new Humanists Australia, Nicholl is hoping to breathe life into the movement in her adopted country. The organisation is a member of the global umbrella organisation for the movement that embraces democracy and ethics, reason and free inquiry, is not theistic and does not believe in the supernatural. The Melbourne-based charity launched last December.

It comes as the number of Australians who say that they have no faith increased to nearly one-third in the last 2016 census. A recent study found that seven in 10 (71%) Australians say religion is not personally important.

Humanism is not new to Australia, however. The Council of Australian Humanist Societies was founded in 1965. But Humanism Australia marks the first time that there has been a national humanist organisation for individuals to join, and which is focused on supporting them, says Nicholl.

In its early days the Humanist Society of NSW had 770 members and its public meetings attracted crowds of 200 people or more.

A big driver for the large membership was the outrage over the Vietnam War, recalls Victor Bien, who joined the Queensland branch in 1968 when he de-converted from Anglican Christian evangelicalism.

Other issues which caused people to join were abortion and the cry for law reform, civil liberties, euthanasia, and religious indoctrination in public schools.

Australian society was very conservative at the time, and the numerous activist associations for separate interests that we have today were yet to emerge, says Bien. Once they did, humanist membership numbers declined.

Nicholl hopes to provide a vehicle that can give representation to those who subscribe to secularism in Australia, to create a more inclusive space.

With another census coming up in August it wants to build more humanist communities by organising local meet-ups through which people can hold talks or debates, volunteer or take part in activism.

Although humanists have no rituals or rites of passage, they still mark major life changes such as weddings, births, and funerals.

But we choose to do this by referencing the good in humans, and by sharing time with each other, not by celebrating some undiscovered force in the universe, says Nicholl.

Collin Acton didnt grow up in a religious household, so had little understanding of faith when he joined the navy in 1979. A personal crisis in his 20s led him to a church. Being deployed to the Middle East in 2012 led me away from any notion of a kind or loving God to seeing that as a human construction, he says.

When the former navy director-general of chaplaincy tried to introduce the first non-religious maritime spiritual wellbeing officers he met with high level resistance from a government committee of civilian religious leaders and ADF chaplains. It further shaped his views.

I went from being a mild humanist when I started in that role to becoming a thoroughly convinced and committed humanist at the end of my tenure, says Acton.

The committee, he says, fought tooth and nail against the navys attempts to modernise. Acton was absolutely gobsmacked at the pushback from the religious advisory committee to the services and a number of religious chaplains.

Navy was never seeking to remove religion from the ADF it was always about giving the workforce a choice when seeking pastoral support, he says, adding that more than half of navy personnel are no longer associated with religion.

As a humanist celebrant for the past 26 years, Sally Cant was inspired to seek out an alternative to faith by her atheist father and humanist grandmother four decades ago.

I dont know whether she would have been involved in any type of humanist movement, but I remember having a conversation with (my grandmother) saying that I found her to be the kindest person that Id ever met, and she said look its not hard, says Cant.

She was definitely non-religious but had a very strong interest in the concern for human welfare and was very clear that you dont have to be Christian to think of yourself as a good person.

Cant, based in St Leonards on the Bellarine Peninsula in Victoria, has conducted about 2,500 wedding ceremonies, and set up The Celebrants Training College.

I had seen so many church weddings where religion was just thrown down your throat, especially from the Catholic Church where they demand you do pre-marriage education and wanted to bring to society a humanist perspective in ceremony and make sure I listen very carefully to peoples values, she says.

There has been a rise in the number of civil celebrants, including humanist officiants, from about 1200 in 1995 when Cant first started, to just under 10,000 today.

People want choices and they were over the religious dogma and wanted to be true to themselves. They were looking for something that had substance, meaning and dignity, she says.

Des Cahill, Emeritus Prof of intercultural studies at RMIT University and chair of Religions for Peace Australia, argues that these can be found in faith.

This is not against the humanist point of view, but often I dont think they appreciate the positive functions of religion, he says.

Studies have also shown that religious people volunteer more than the non-religious, says Cahill.

Religious communities inspire and sustain human dignity, offer and weve definitely seen this during Covid-19 partial comfort, hope and healing as well as moral wisdom, he adds, noting that religious groups such as Hindu and Sikh groups have handed out thousands of free hot meals during the pandemic.

But some, like Nicholl, have been left quite traumatised by having Jesus pushed on me so much, so hard, so often by family, and society in general. Its only recently that she realised the anguish that shes endured.

I just want to have my rights respected for people to accept that I am a thoughtful, kind, smart person who doesnt believe in a divine revelation and that I can make my own way thoughtfully in the world without believing in their God, says Nicholl.

See the article here:

Meet the humanists: You dont have to be Christian to think of yourself as a good person - The Guardian

Bill Barrett. Photo by Jason Vail

Actor Bill Barrett (The Oval) chatted with Digital Journals Markos Papadatos about the upcoming second half of Season 2 of The Oval on BET, which premiers on Tuesday, July 20, and his other acting projects.

I am so pumped for the second half of Tyler Perrys The Oval, he said. These past two months have been a long time, I have been waiting. Everything looks so good up until now. Episode 13 was wild, it was a good place to cut it off for the midseason finale.

Ive had the chance to work with completely different actors in Season 2 so it has been really fun to work with everybody, he said. It is interesting to see the different worlds of the whole show. Going from a Secret Service Agent in the White House to now being out on the run, and also trying to get revenge back is a lot of fun. Its wild, he said with a laugh.

Barrett also opened up about his experience in First Wives Club, and doing the film Reverend Falls. First Wives Club has been great. It just premiered on BET, he said. IT was a great cast and a great group of people. They have been really supportive just like The Oval. I love comedy, so that has been fun for me to do.

He described the short film Reverend Falls as a great experience. That was a short film that I did two years. It was an interesting character. The movie involves a preacher who is battling with his beliefs on being atheist even though he is a reverend. It takes viewers on a journey and I thought it was a really interesting project to be a part of for that reason, he said.

In the first half of Season 2, he noted that the cabin scenes with Travis Cure (who plays Bobby) were a lot of fun. I love working with Travis, he is amazing. He has such great energy, excitement, and enthusiasm. Hes a really good dude, he said.

Barrett concluded about The Oval, Season 2 has been fascinating every week, there is so much character development and you know the people better. Now, you can get into their lives and their minds more.

To learn more about actor Bill Barrett, check out his IMDb page.

For more information on Tyler Perrys The Oval, check out the official BET website.

See the rest here:

Catching up with Bill Barrett about 'The Oval,' 'First Wives Club,' and 'Reverend Falls' - Digital Journal

Its finally here. The trailer for the movie you didnt know you didnt want: Gods Not Dead 4 (technically titled Gods Not Dead: We The People).

Its hard to tell what the movie is about, given that 90% of the trailer is all the America stock footage the producers could find, legal clichs like You are out of order!, and an obligatory cameo from Jeanine Pirro.

But the few seconds of substance suggest the film centers around a battle over public education guidelines that directly impact homeschooling Christian families. While claiming to be a storyabout religious freedom, its really about Christian families trying toavoid some bare minimum level of oversight. Just listen to the dramatic music when a social worker visits a homeschooling family to check their environment, as if looking out for a childs best interests is some kind of federal overreach. Given the way Christian legal groups have opposed any kind of checks on homeschooling parents, allowing ignorance and abuse to go unnoticed, that sort of oversight would actually be pretty damn useful.

Theres also an angry Christian parent who says to the main character, Religion has been removed from our schools. Theyre teaching kids that they dont need God! which is not a thing that actually happens. So at least the film series is consistent in spreading misinformation.

All of that seems to culminate in a battle in Congress where David A. R. White who played the same character in Gods Not Dead: A Light in Darkness gives a not-exactly-Sorkinesque monologue about how our government is of the people, by the people, for the people. (Everyone in the crowd claps and cheers as if theyve never heard that phrase before.)

Honestly, Im not even sure who the token atheist is in this movie. Is the franchise even about God anymore? The new film is just a way to milk the title of the first film to sell some other kind of Christian propaganda. White couldve spent two hours literally beating a dead horse on camera, called it Gods Not Dead: The Horse Gets It, and that film would be less subtle than the one thats about to be released.

Theres also no self-awareness of how white evangelical Christians have harmed our nation in recent years. I mean, just look at this poster:

Christian Nationalism helped fuel the January 6 insurrection, yet that image shows a Christian Nationalist looking at Congress with reverence. This film was made for an audience full of the kinds of people who tried to take over that building using violence, and yet White is using his platform to spread more lies about how Christians are victims in our society.

Last December, when White announced the movie for the first time, he said it was loosely inspired by the classic Frank Capra film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, in which Jimmy Stewarts character gets appointed to the Senate, then stages a filibuster for all the right reasons.

But White is no Jimmy Stewart, and Christian persecution in the U.S. still isnt real.

The only question is how well this movie will do.

Just to recap this history of this franchise, the first Gods Not Dead truly was a phenomenon, making more than $64 million during its run in theaters in 2014. The sequel, which came out in 2016, made over $24 million. That likely covered all the production costs and then some, but it wasnt a blockbuster by any means.

Gods Not Dead: A Light in Darkness, the third film in the series? It made just over $7 million. Not even close to the other two. (One YouTube commenter who watched the new trailer wrote, I hated the first two, clearly not realizing there even was a third film.)

Another way of analyzing the success of a film is looking at how it did in its opening weekend.

Gods Not Dead made $9,217,013 in 780 theaters (an average of $11,817) its first weekend.

Gods Not Dead 2 made $7,623,662 in 2,419 theaters (an average of $3,151).

Gods Not Dead: A Light in Darkness made $2,689,677 in 1,693 theaters (an average of $1,588).

How bad is that? Kirk Camerons Saving Christmas made more money per theater on its opening weekend, and that movies one of the worst rated films in IMDbs history.

All of that is to say: No one needed a fourth Gods Not Dead film. Considering the decline of the franchise and the struggles in the movie theater business right now, theres an open question of how badly this film will do. (Someone should start a pool and take bets.)

Whatever the case, the movie will be in theaters sometime this fall, courtesy of the Christian film studio Pinnacle Peak Pictures, formerly known as Pure Flix Entertainment. But lets be honest: You already know everything you need to know about it.

(Portions of this article were published earlier)

Original post:

The God's Not Dead 4 Trailer Is Out and the Franchise Isn't Even Trying Anymore - Friendly Atheist - Patheos

Two giant questions leaped off the page as the interpreters of American religion began reading the latest data dump from Public Religion Research Institute July 8: How could this data about mainline Protestants be correct, and why is the data about the nones so different from what previously has been reported?

PRRI, which is the new kid on the block in terms of religion polling, has amassed a sterling reputation for releasing accessible data that interprets current trends, such as attitudes about the 2020 presidential election and attitudes about race. PRRI founder Robert P. Jones has drawn extensively on his firms research in his books, including his most recent acclaimed publication, White Too Long.

The other big names in religion polling are Gallup, Pew Research and Barna Research, with Gallup being the elder statesman of the group. But there also are two other sources of religion data that most laypeople are not aware of sources that provide much of the raw data that scholars and statisticians crunch and interpret in hundreds of ways. These are the General Social Survey and the Cooperative Election Study.

One of the biggest stories of religion news in recent years has been the rapid growth of the nones.

Think of these last two sources as data wholesalers. Theyre the equivalent of manufacturers who produce the products that end up on your grocery store shelves, although you as a consumer only interact with the grocery store and pay no attention to the wholesalers behind the curtain.

Thats the background to provide understanding of the latest polling from PRRI, which already has made headlines around the nation. Many of those headlines have focused on a reported increase in mainline Protestants or a reported decline in the percentage of Americans who identify as religious nones.

PRRIs cell phone and landline phone survey of 50,334 persons over the course of an entire year (2020) found that growth of the nones is slowing. Nones are those who when asked on other surveys what their religious affiliation is skip all the normal answers and instead chose none of the above.

In his new book, Burge uses previously published data, including from the General Social Survey and Pew, to report that the nones currently comprise 34% of the U.S. population up from just 5% of Americans in the 1970s and 22% in 2008. Thus, this has been dubbed the fastest growing religious group in America.

According to this perspective, atheists and agnostics each represent 6% of the population, while 21% of Americans identify as the more common type of none people whose religion is nothing in particular.

The new PRRI data, however, calculates that religiously unaffiliated Americans comprise 23% of the population, including the nothing in particular (17%) and those who identify as atheist (3%) or agnostic (3%).

Thats an overall comparative 4-point drop in the fastest-growing religious group in America. And it counts atheists and agnostics at half the strength of other surveys.

PRRIs answer is that the growth of the nones reached its peak in 2018 and now is settling back to slightly lower numbers.

PRRIs answer is that the growth of the nones reached its peak in 2018 and now is settling back to slightly lower numbers. If true, thats a spot of good news for the institutional church in America, which has been losing adherents by the thousands every year and fretting over how to reach the nones.

As the PRRI data have been public only a week, complete answers to questions about how one survey compares to another are not yet available. However, you can be sure this will be a topic of intense conversation and writing in the days to come.

One important note: PRRI points out that the increase in religious disaffiliation has occurred across all age groups but has been most pronounced among young Americans. And even though the likelihood of an 18- to 29-year-old being a none has dropped 2 points, the unaffiliated group still accounts for 36% of the young adult population the largest percentage of any age group.

More vexing and controversial is PRRIs report on mainline Protestants: The slight increase in white Christians between 2018 and 2020 was driven primarily by an uptick in the proportion of white mainline (non-evangelical) Protestants and a stabilization in the proportion of white Catholics. Since 2007, white mainline (non-evangelical) Protestants have declined from 19% of the population to a low of 13% in 2016, but the last three years have seen small but steady increases, up to 16% in 2020.

Ryan Burge, the professor who studies the nones, weighed in on this one. His message: Wait a minute; dont get too excited about this. His reason for caution: Internal data from all the mainline denominations continues to show precipitous declines in membership and participation.

Sidenote here: Perhaps youre wondering who is a mainline Protestant. Thats a good question with a complicated answer.

Historically, the mainline has included the so-called Seven Sisters, which are the United Methodist Church, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Presbyterian Church (USA), the Episcopal Church in America, American Baptist Churches USA, the United Church of Christ, and the Disciples of Christ. Plus a few other smaller groups. Depending on whos counting.

A notable distinction for Baptists is that American Baptist churches are counted among the mainline but Southern Baptist churches and most Black Baptist churches are not. Southern Baptists typically get counted among evangelical churches. Newer Baptist groups such as the Alliance of Baptists and the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship seemingly fall between the cracks of statistical categories.

Burge explains that most religion researchers think of three kinds of Protestants (and by the way, theres a whole separate conversation to be had about whether Baptists are technically Protestants anyway). Those categories are evangelical, mainline and historically Black Protestants.

The wholesale data that researchers like Burge have used to chart a continued downward path for the mainline shows its share of the American market to be about 12%, down from 30% as recently as the 1970s. And the combined data reported by those denominations also parallels the same dramatic declines.

This analysis alone indicates that there are six million fewer members of these seven traditions than just a decade ago. Its hard to conceive of a situation where these denominations are losing hundreds of thousands of members each year, yet the overall mainline tradition is growing in size.

How, then, to account for the new PRRI data that shows a small but steady increase in the mainline?

The answer most likely is found in how the survey questions are asked, Burge said. Other surveys, including the General Social Survey and the Cooperative Election Study, use a series of branching questions in their polls that take respondents down a path of answering are you this or that? and then are you this or that?

PRRI uses a different, and also valid, approach. The first question is about broad religious tradition, Burge explained. This includes response options like: Protestant, Catholic, Mormon or atheist. Then, respondents are asked if they identify as evangelical or born-again or not. If they say that they are Protestants and self-identify as evangelical, then they are evangelicals. But, if they say they are Protestant but dont identify as evangelical, then they are mainline. Using this approach compared to the denominational strategy can lead to slightly different estimates.

However you slice the data, though, there is one clear and unmistakable conclusion, Burge said: The largest traditions in the mainline are losing members at an incredibly rapid rate.

Coming tomorrow: The new PRRI data digs down to a county-by-county level to offer some of the most localized insight on religion politics available anywhere.

Link:

New national survey flips the narrative on mainline Protestants and the 'nones,' but why? - Baptist News Global

Matt Powell, the hate-preacher and Creationist who appears to have dedicated his life to making atheists look smart, has done it again.

Fresh off of his claim that evolution is racist because it supposedly teaches that we evolved from African Americans even though there are African Americans that are still alive today yes, hes really that dumb Powell is back with a new argument to disprove evolution using toddler logic. (Or, as Creationists call it, Ph.D.-level thinking.)

(In case he deletes that video out of embarrassment, heres a mirror.)

His argument goes like this.

1) Evolutionists often say they want to save endangered species. (Yes.)2) That means there are species going extinct. (Yes.)3) But according to evolution, species should be getting created all the time through natural selection. (Yes, but not the way he thinks.)4) Therefore, by trying to save the animals, evolutionists are admitting that evolution will never invent these new species through natural selection. (Oh Christ)

Checkmate, atheists says the guy who doesnt understand chess.

Its true that species go extinct all the time and thats unfortunately accelerating. We may want to save them for a variety of reasons, ranging from purely aesthetic reasons to preserving a particular ecosystem. Theres also an argument that every living thing has a unique genetic identity that could be useful to understand for reasons we cant quite fathom just yet; if theyre gone for good, we miss out on all that potential knowledge.

Its not that natural selection wont produce new species in the future; of course it will. Its doing that as we speak, slowly and imperceptibly. The problem is that evolution doesnt work quickly and were (almost certainly) never going to get those exact species back no matter how long we wait.

Theres a famous thought experiment in the world of evolution: If we could start over, would we evolve the same way? Certain traits (like sight) would undoubtedly emerge again. But humans? Looking and sounding like we do right now? Probably not.

If certain rhinos or elephants disappear and that could happen we wont live to see those animals suddenly emerge out of nowhere or whatever Powell thinks evolution demands.

He doesnt understand the topic, so he makes up his own definition of how evolution works in a way that no evolutionary biologist would ever accept, then doubles down on his own misunderstandings. And he presents himself as an expert in every video even though hes not even a student who could get a passing grade in a basic science class.

The end of the video features even more of his unearned Christian cockiness. He tries to trash atheists for not having a perfectly defined purpose to their life and then does some weird Creationists word-twist:

what [atheists are] admitting is that theyre making up or make-believing a purpose for life. They dont think there actually is any purpose, and so they say, Well, Ill just make up purpose.

Thats make believe, folks! These people are make-believers!

Leave it to the Adam-and-Eve-were-the-first-two-humans-alive people to mock atheists for making things up when all were doing is accepting reality.

Listen, Matt: Find some new friends. Find anyone who cares about you enough to stop you from embarrassing yourself. Take some time off and learn about the thing you so desperately want to disprove. Because right now, you sound like an Introduction to Physics student who insists every astrophysicist is getting the universe all wrong.

Get some humility. Or at least run your scripts by someone who understands the topic before you etch your ignorance in stone.

See the original post here:

Creationist: The Fight to Save Endangered Species Proves Evolution is a Lie - Friendly Atheist - Patheos

(RNS) Popular activities for this (mostly) vaccinated summer include: visiting heavily populated beaches, hanging out indoors with crowds of more than 50 and debating biblical Greek translations on the internet.

On TikTok, more than 49 million users have viewed the hashtag #deconstruction a buzzword chiefly among evangelicals and former evangelicals who are re-analyzing the traditional faith they grew up in.

The hashtag #BibleTranslations has roughly a half million views, leading to earnest advice on selecting a Bible translation or lighthearted videos poking fun at the King James Version. But a dynamic subsection of creators is using the platform to debunk what they see as dangerous misinterpretations of biblical texts.

Some of the deconstructionists of TikTok are progressive Christian pastors with theology degrees. Others have studied their way out of the churches they grew up in and are now religiously unaffiliated. Still others are sharing scraps of knowledge they have picked up in the telephone game of the internet. But whether atheist or Christian or somewhere in between, this corner of biblical TikTok is united over a shared nerdy obsession with getting words right.

Explaining the nitty-gritty details of ancient Greek and Hebrew in Christian Scriptures may not seem like viral content, but on TikTok, its algorithm fire.

Here are three of the most popularly deconstructed words on the video platform.

One of the biggest trends in the biblical translations of deconstructionist TikTokis breaking down the many meanings packed into the word hell.

JeGaysus, a creator with a devoted following of 180,000, offers his literary critique on Gehenna a word often translated as hell in the guise of a rainbow-scarfed Jesus.

Watch video here

Hell is often presented as a big, scary reason not to leave Christianity you dont want to wager on eternal life and be on the losing end. At least, thats how Jesseca Reddell felt (Motherofdogs on TikTok). For Reddell, learning more about the different meanings behind H-E-double-hockey-sticks helped her get over her fear of eternal damnation if she left her church. Share with your traumatized friend, the video caption suggests.

Watch video here

There are many ancient traditions about the afterlife. Scriptural descriptions of the bad place are often intertwined with secular ideas that were popular at the time. So one big question deconstruction advocates pose is what word is actually behind the English translation, hell. Maybe Gehenna? Possibly Tartarus? Could be Hades or even Sheol?

Ricky Brock Jr. has a bachelors in theology, which he puts to use responding to his followers questions about the afterlife. Here, he explains some of the origins of the concept of hell in order to help a commenter overcome their fear.

Watch video here

The Greek words that are translated in contemporary English as homosexuality or homosexuals are just as hotly debated as hell among TikTok scholars.

The Rev. Karla Kamstra offers a little ditty to summarize her thoughts on where the word homosexual can be found in the Bible.

Watch video here

Many creators, like Kamstra above, focus on the Greek word Paul uses in 1 Corinthians 6:9 arsenokoitai. They point out controversies in the history of its translation and the different ways to interpret the word. The ancient Greek word gets trotted out in daily internet beef, like in Macy Schultzs video below:

Watch video here

Andrew Harrison Cox has seminary training and now works at a justice ministry in Florida. His videos, like the one below, point out the gap between the cultural phenomena Paul refers to and how we talk about homosexuality today.

Watch video here

Others flesh out passages such as Romans 1:26 with more cultural context. Heres the passage (NIV translation, just for the record):

Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

But, according to one TikToker, Pauls referring to specific acts happening in pagan temples as part of idolatrous worship.

Watch video here

These biblical deconstructionists of TikTok have landed on a single conclusion: They are in fairly firm agreement that, according to the Bible, homosexuality is not a sin.

Andrew Harrison Cox preaches that message to try to dispel the anxiety his followers express.

Watch video here

The father of lies provides nearly limitless fodder for TikTok theologians looking to undo some common misconceptions. Creators discuss the different titles in the Scriptures that have become names for the Prince of Darkness we know and loathe today.

Deconstructing the story of the devil also attracts creators who dont normally dedicate their feeds to biblical interpretation or deconstruction content. Such as Logan Ford, 25, who claims Lucifers origins were a typo.

Watch video here

And some, like Jeff Baker, pastor and co-founder of Chosen Family Church, manage to cram a semesters worth of biblical criticism on scriptural imagery for Satan into a 60-second video:

Watch video here

If youre looking for a crash course in pop biblical criticism, enjoy stoking online arguments over ancient texts or just hope to learn a little Greek in 60 seconds, maybe open TikTok and start scrolling.

Visit link:

Three of the most mistranslated words in Scripture according to TikTokers - Religion News Service

ANTHEA BUTLER HAS spent the bulk of her career studying the influence of white religion on Black people. Formerly a Pentecostal evangelical, she studied to become a pastor before switching paths and taking a job at the University of Pennsylvania teaching religious studies and Africana studies. Shes the ideal person to write a book like White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America, in which she explores the deep-rooted racism prevalent in white evangelical culture, from the 19th century and the Southern Christian defense of slavery to Trump evangelical voting bloc today.

A relatively quick read that favors direct arguments over academic jargon, her book implores the reader to see the path of racism inherent in the history of white American evangelicalism. Like Butler, I was raised in a Pentecostal home in the heart of the South and later left evangelicalism entirely. I read the book from that perspective: Ive watched my communitys dominant culture use a veil of respectability to cover inherently racist beliefs.

Butler sets the stage boldly by defining evangelical in a political rather than theological frame:

Evangelicals are, however, concerned with their political alliance with the Republican Party and with maintaining the cultural and racial whiteness that they have transmitted to the public. This is the working definition of American evangelicalism. American print and television media have embraced and promoted this definition, and the American public has accepted it.

The more moderate people who supported slavery argued that, at the very least, the Bible didnt prohibit the institution. The president of the College of William and Mary, Thomas R. Dew, said:

With regard to the assertion, that slavery is against the spirit of Christianity, we are ready to admit the general assertion, but deny most positively that there is anything in the Old or New Testament, which would go to show that slavery, when once introduced, ought at all events to be abrogated, or that the master commits any offence in holding slaves. The children of Israel themselves were slave holders, and were not condemned for it.

Once slavery became illegal, evangelical bigotry shifted into issues like segregation, communism, and immigration. Most white evangelicals remained neutral or affirmative on Jim Crow laws. During the Civil Rights movement, protests for equal access to public education, housing, and transportation were tied to the vague threat of communism. Martin Luther King Jr. and other leaders were regularly smeared with this label, and evangelicals dismissed their integration efforts because of it.

Evangelicals called their entire congregations to fight back against integration and civil rights. W. A. Criswell, pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas and personal friend of famously pro-segregation Senator Strom Thurmond, said at a Southern Baptist conference in 1953: True ministers must passionately resist government mandated desegregation efforts because it is a denial of all we believe in.

And what is it that they believed in? They believed in keeping white people separate from Black people and maintaining white supremacy at all costs.

Of course, evangelicals knew there was some drawback to being seen as explicitly racist, especially as progressive causes and figures became more popular. Until Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat, passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, evangelicals had not yet officially tethered themselves to the Republican Party. After schools were desegregated, many evangelicals sent their kids to private schools, where they quietly practiced racial discrimination until the IRS began pulling their tax-exempt status. It was this 1971 policy that got right-wing thinkers of the time (like Heritage Foundation co-founder Paul Weyrich) to unite with pastors like Jerry Falwell Sr. and politicians like Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan in a political campaign. They would encourage their audiences to flood politicians with letters declaring their opposition to the policy.

Falwells Moral Majority also stood united against abortion, homosexuality, and pornography, as well as political issues like the Equal Rights Amendment for women. They outlined a specific Southern strategy focusing on economic issues, which Republican consultant Lee Atwater discussed plainly in an interview:

By 1968, you cant say [racial expletive] that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like uh, forced busing, states rights, and all that stuff, and youre getting so abstract. Now, youre talking about cutting taxes, and all these things youre talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites. [] We want to cut this is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than [racial expletive].

But Butler believes it was the 2008 election of President Barack Obama, our first Black president, that was a turning point in evangelical racism and eventually resulted in Donald Trumps election in 2016. Obama had been born to a Kenyan man who was raised in Islam (though later converted to Anglicanism before becoming an atheist), so both Islamophobia and racism were in full effect for evangelicals. Butler believes Obama underestimated this:

Obamas nave belief that Republicans, and evangelicals by default, would play fair was a major miscalculation on his part not just in the campaign but in his presidency. By March 2008, questions were already being raised about Obama having studied at a madrassa as a youth in Indonesia, and rumors were circulating about him not being an American citizen. These rumors eventually morphed into the birtherism campaign, which claimed that Obama was a Muslim and was not an American citizen because his father was Kenyan.

Graham worried about the increasing levels of civil disobedience deployed in the civil rights movement. He had hoped to see the movement continue to advocate for change via the justice system, not through civil disobedience, even if it was nonviolent. Eventually, Graham began to take tougher stances against Kings efforts. He was especially disdainful after the March on Washington in August 1963, when he made the aforementioned remarks about Kings Dream speech that it would take the second coming of Christ before we would see white children walk hand in hand with Black children.

But armed with accurate history, one definitely has a better chance of convincing white evangelicals. After all, I was once a card-carrying Republican and an active Pentecostal myself. Christianity Today ironically, the magazine founded by Billy Graham seems somewhat motivated to impress the issue of racial reconciliation between Black and white evangelicals, even finding themselves criticized by Franklin Graham for their stances. But thats only the tip of the iceberg. If white evangelicals really want to address the harm that white supremacy has done to their politics and religion, it must be more dramatic. They cannot be afraid of hurting their racist friends feelings, and they cannot attend churches where conservative opinions matter more than Black lives.

At the end of the day, Butler just wants you to see white evangelicalism for what it is no more excuses, no more covering up its history as a racist institution. She lays bare the ways that white evangelicals have actively driven the worst of the United Statess most racist history, including slavery, dehumanization, the KKK, lynchings, segregation, whitewashed history, and the criminal justice system. They cant hide from their past or the way that it cements their beliefs and ideals in the present. But what will white evangelicalism look like in the future? Thats a question best left to the white evangelicals themselves and one that neither Butler nor I can answer. At some point, they are going to have to choose what, and who, they support.

Originally posted here:

All the White Churches - lareviewofbooks

The city of Chesapeake, Virginia is about to slap In God We Trust stickers on all city-owned vehicles in a bizarre attempt to force unity using the most divisive thing imaginable: religion.

On Tuesday, members of the City Council unanimously agreed to the roughly $87,000 plan which would see the decals added whenever the vehicles go in for their next scheduled maintenance appointment.

In April, Councilman Don Carey asked the department to look into placing the decals on vehicles.

Carey said he wanted decals on city vehicles to quell divisive rhetoric and begin to unify people along racial and political lines.

If you look around, you can see that the state of our country, the state of our city is crumbling from a social fabric standpoint, Carey said Tuesday night.

If the social fabric is crumbling, then the way to repair it doesnt involve an $87,000 slap in the face by an elected official to Muslims, atheists, and everyone else whos not a conservative Christian. How pathetic for Carey to suggest this unnecessary fix and how irresponsible for every other council member to go along with it.

Its not like every speaker at the city council meeting spoke in favor of the idea either. They were warned!

But at least one speaker said the motto isnt fully representative of the country and that it should be modified to say In God Some of Us Trust.

The sad thing is theres not much of a legal remedy here since Christians can just hide behind the Its the national motto! excuse. Public shaming and pointing out the utter uselessness of this performative gesture is pretty much all weve got.

(Image via Facebook. Thanks to Brandon for the link)

Read the original post:

Chesapeake (VA) to Add In God We Trust to Vehicles to Stop Divisive Rhetoric - Friendly Atheist - Patheos

There Are Many, Many Kinds of Biblical Marriages | Hemant Mehta | Friendly Atheist | PatheosThere Are Many, Many Kinds of Biblical MarriagesJune 27, 2021Hemant Mehta

Since its Pride Month, it seems like a good time to remind everyone that marriage doesnt have to be between one man and one woman.

In fact, the Bible makes it clear that there are several other kinds of marriages that God is perfectly fine with some of which He really shouldve prohibited.

I talk about them in this video:

If you like that one, please subscribe to the channel!

Select a CategoryAbortionAdam FanninAdviceAppignani Humanist Legal CenterArk EncounterAtheist AdvertisingAtheist DemographicsAtheist GenerosityAtheist ParentingAtheist/Christian CooperationAustraliaBabiesBangladeshi BloggersBook ClubBooksBrittany MeyerCamp QuestCanadaCaptain DisillusionCartoonsCenter for InquiryChurchesComing OutCongressional Freethought CaucusContestsCosmicSkepticDarkMatter2525DeathDebatesDownloadable PDFsE.W. JacksonEducationEdward TarteEx-MuslimsFA on YTFeminismFFRFFine ArtsFlat EarthFoundation Beyond BeliefGeneralGenetically Modified SkepticGreg LockeHeathen Holiday CardsHousekeepingHumorInfiltrationInterviewsInvestigationsJehovah's WitnessesJesse GalefJill SteinJim BakkerJonathan ShelleyJoshua FeuersteinKat KerrKenneth CopelandLatino AtheistsLawLee StrobelLGBTQLongformLove/SexMagazine ArticlesMathMatt PowellMike ClawsonMilitaryNew IFBPastor Matt PowellPastor Steven AndersonPictureoftheDayPodcastPoetryPoliticsPop CulturePseudoscienceRachel OatesRationality RulesReason Rally 2016Richard WadeRon GoldRyan P. BurgeScienceSean FeuchtSecular AvenueSecular Coalition for AmericaSecular Group ShowcaseSecular Invocations (Post-Greece)Secular Student AllianceShades of Black AtheismSportsStreet EpistemologyThat Old-Time ReligionThe Atheist VoiceThe Young Atheist's Survival GuideTheraminTreesTrina HoaksWar on Christmas

Select a MonthJune 2021May 2021April 2021March 2021February 2021January 2021December 2020November 2020October 2020September 2020August 2020July 2020June 2020May 2020April 2020March 2020February 2020January 2020December 2019November 2019October 2019September 2019August 2019July 2019June 2019May 2019April 2019March 2019February 2019January 2019December 2018November 2018October 2018September 2018August 2018July 2018June 2018May 2018April 2018March 2018February 2018January 2018December 2017November 2017October 2017September 2017August 2017July 2017June 2017May 2017April 2017March 2017February 2017January 2017December 2016November 2016October 2016September 2016August 2016July 2016June 2016May 2016April 2016March 2016February 2016January 2016December 2015November 2015October 2015September 2015August 2015July 2015June 2015May 2015April 2015March 2015February 2015January 2015December 2014November 2014October 2014September 2014August 2014July 2014June 2014May 2014April 2014March 2014February 2014January 2014December 2013November 2013October 2013September 2013August 2013July 2013June 2013May 2013April 2013March 2013February 2013January 2013December 2012November 2012October 2012September 2012August 2012July 2012June 2012May 2012April 2012March 2012February 2012January 2012December 2011November 2011October 2011September 2011August 2011July 2011June 2011May 2011April 2011March 2011February 2011January 2011December 2010November 2010October 2010September 2010August 2010July 2010June 2010May 2010April 2010March 2010February 2010January 2010December 2009November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007February 2007January 2007December 2006November 2006October 2006September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

error: Content is protected !!

Link:

There Are Many, Many Kinds of Biblical Marriages | Hemant Mehta | Friendly Atheist | Patheos - Friendly Atheist - Patheos