Category Archives: Astronomy

A national tour discussing the upcoming total solar eclipse will stop in Council Bluffs and several other southwest Iowa communities in the coming several days.

Kevin Manning, an astronomer and former NASA consultant, will speak at the Council Bluffs Public Library on Thursday at 7 p.m. as part of a tour called Look Up to the Stars.

Elsewhere in The Nonpareils area, Manning will visit public libraries in Clarinda at 7 p.m. today, Sidney at 7 p.m. Wednesday, Glenwood at 2 p.m. Thursday, Shenandoah at 6 p.m. Saturday and Atlantic at 7 p.m. Monday, according to the tours website, lookuptothestars.com, as well as library websites.

After that, the tour departs for Illinois and Indiana.

A release from the Council Bluffs library states that Manning worked as a consultant on the Chandra X-Ray Observatory with NASA and is a passionate science educator.

Come experience an educational and entertaining exploration of the universe, the stars and other celestial wonders, as well as a refreshingly large perspective gained by looking up at the sky, the library said in the release.

Following Mannings presentation, weather permitting, an outdoor star viewing with a custom-designed telescope will be offered.

The event is free and open to the public.

The program, The Universe & An All American Total Solar Eclipse, explores eclipses and other celestial events using positional astronomy to determine the location of objects in the sky at a particular date, time and location, according to the tours website.

A total eclipse of the sun will take place Aug. 21, with Iowa except for a tiny sliver of Fremont County that will be in totality experiencing a partial eclipse.

Another eclipse-related opportunity is coming up next week when the University of Nebraska at Omahas David Kriegler will present a public lecture June 10 at 6 p.m. and June 11 at 2 p.m. at the Durham Science Building.

Read the rest here:

Astronomy tour to visit several SWI libraries next week - The Daily Nonpareil

Why a solar eclipse happens isnt exactly a mysterious concept. Astronomers have been studying the celestial events for centuries, and the science behind them is well-documented.

The science behind solar eclipse-chasing crowd sizes, on the other hand, can be as cloudy as a late August day on the Oregon Coast.

How many people are going to descend on Central Oregon to watch the moon block out the sun at 10:19 a.m. Aug. 21 has been the million-dollar question since local officials started preparing for the event more than a year ago, said Lysa Vattimo, who was hired by the city of Madras in 2016 to oversee local eclipse planning.

Its what everybody is dying to know, Vattimo said.

Predictions of how many visitors will show up vary, but the states Office of Emergency Management forecasts that about 1 million people will come to Oregon to watch the eclipse an estimate it based very broadly, OEM Emergency Planner Erik Rau said, on the number of campsites, hotel rooms, permitted events and an additional number as a percentage of the state population.

Its such a tricky number to try and get to because we really dont know, said OEM spokesperson Paula Negele.

Closer to home, local officials estimates fall closer to 200,000 total eclipse visitors for Jefferson, Crook and Deschutes counties.

But the truth is, Vattimo said, trying to figure out the size of the eclipse crowds is more akin to astrology than astronomy.

People dont really like the crystal-ball theory, but thats basically what it is looking into a crystal ball, she said.

Its up to each county in the state to figure out their respective eclipse crowd estimates as time permits, Rau wrote in an email to The Bulletin, noting that estimating those numbers is very challenging.

The few case studies available for regional eclipse tourism (Travel Salem researched an eclipse from Cairns, Australia in 2012) arent useful in providing specific numbers, but did confirm that large numbers of people will make an effort to travel in order to view an eclipse, he wrote in the email.

One way to do the math

In Central Oregon, a tri-county incident-management team was put together to oversee eclipse-related events, and it came up with a visitor number 204,000 that local officials can work with. Mike Ryan, the emergency services manager for Crook County who helps oversee the regional team, went over the formula the team managers used to reach its estimated visitor total.

I used to be able to recite it from memory, but all the numbers keep changing, he said, shuffling through papers to find the formula.

According to Ryan, the incident-management team starts with the number of potential visitors who could attend private, regional events based on event permit attendance caps.

Then it adds in the number of hotel rooms in Central Oregon multiplied by a factor of 2.3 to account for how many people will probably be staying in the hotel rooms, Ryan explained.

Lets say there are 30 rooms, and 10 have two people in the room; 10 have three, and 10 have four. Ryan said, trailing off. Basically it takes into consideration a couple or a couple plus 1 or 2 or 3 or 4.

Finally, Ryan said, throw in the total number of Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service campsites multiplied by a factor of four or eight BLM sites allow eight people to camp; USFS sites allow four as well as 10 percent of the tri-county population, 21,000.

Twenty-one thousand is the visiting friends and family or people that are renting a room or an RV from someone, he said, adding that the management team predicts another 100,000 or so people will drive to the area for one day only. So 204,000 is the total number of visitors. I usually clarify that by saying these numbers could be low or high.

Another method

Demonstrating the inexact science behind eclipse crowd estimates, Vattimo, whos in charge of predicting how many eclipse chasers will come to Madras, conducts her math a little differently from Ryan. Using a formula she came up with, Vattimo recently upped her original local forecast that around 75,000 people would come to Madras to watch the eclipse by more than 25,000 people. She reports her new estimate, about 102,000, with an air of cautious confidence. After all, she said, her formula was given the OK by the states Office of Emergency Management.

They told me thats probably a really good approach to use, probably, Vattimo said, referring to her formula, which she proceeded to break down.

According to Vattimo, she takes the number of hotel rooms in Madras, plus the total number of campsites she knows about at privately run events around town. Then she adds the number of owner-occupied single-family homes in Madras and the citys total population to the mix. She multiplies the total by four the approximate number of people she assumes will be visiting the citys residents.

Not everyone will have four people, but down the street someone will have 16, Vattimo said, explaining why she multiplies by four a factor Ryan said he considers maybe a little too high.

Finally, Vattimo said she adds in 10 percent of Deschutes Countys population to account for the number of people she thinks will be traveling north to escape Bends inferior solar eclipse viewing experience.

There you have it 102,000, she said. I just went with it; I had to have something to give the public safety and public works departments. I was tired of hearing all these big numbers thrown out there; it sounded like people were pulling numbers out of the sky.

Reporter: 541-617-7829,

awest@bendbulletin.com

View post:

Predicting eclipse crowds: More astrology than astronomy - Bend Bulletin

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LROC) was launched back in June 2008 to study the Moon. It was created with two Narrow Angle Cameras (NACs) and the Wide Angle Camera to capture high-resolution images of the Moons surface.

While these high-tech cameras were typically sending back beautiful and clear images, scientists were puzzled on October 13, 2014 when the LRO sent back an unclear jittery image.

Mark Robinson, professor and principle investigator of LROC, said the poor quality of the image was likely caused by a brief, violent collision to the left NAC. The team ran through a list of what could have caused the disruption, but there were no issues with the spacecraft and Robinson said those types of issues would have also impacted the right NAC.

The only logical explanation, Robinson said in a press release, is that the NAC was hit by a meteoroid.

To verify this theory, the LROC team used a computer model that was created during LROCs development a vibration table that was used to simulate a launch, a test that the cameras passed to prove stability.

They reproduced the distortions from the image received and determined that the left NAC was hit by an 0.8 mm meteoroid with a density of 2.7 grams/cm3 going at a velocity of about 4.3 miles (7 kilometers) per second.

The meteoroid was traveling much faster than a speeding bullet, Robinson said. In this case, LROC did not dodge a speeding bullet, but rather survived a speeding bullet!

Not only is it rare for an instrument to survive such a collision, but according to Robinson its incredibly rare for the camera to capture the event. Luckily, the meteoroid didnt cause any serious damage to the instruments.

Since the impact presented no technical problems for the health and safety of the instrument, the team is only now announcing this event as a fascinating example of how engineering data can be used, in ways not previously anticipated, to understand what is happing to the spacecraft over 236,000 miles (380,000 kilometers) from the Earth, said John Keller, LRO project scientist from NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center.

Read more from the original source:

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter was hit by a meteoroid and lived - Astronomy Magazine

AccuWeather.com (blog)

Astronomy Guide to the rest of the Memorial Day Weekend AccuWeather.com (blog) Memorial Day weekend is here! If you have plans to relax outside this weekend, there are some cool things to check out in the night sky. We've been talking ... and more »

Continue reading here:

Astronomy Guide to the rest of the Memorial Day Weekend - AccuWeather.com (blog)

Researchers also studied the planets immense magnetic field and found that close to the planet it was much stronger than expected, clocking in at 7.766 Gauss about ten times stronger than Earths. Their measurements also found lots of magnetic complexity near Jupiters outermost layers, which supports the hypothesis that the worlds magnetic field is being driven by the swirling liquid hydrogen layer beneath the clouds. A full mapping of the magnetic field awaits data from further Juno orbits.

Juno is giving us a view of the magnetic field close to Jupiter that weve never had before, said Jack Connerney, Junos deputy principal investigator. Already, we see that the magnetic field looks lumpy: It is stronger in some places and weaker in others. This uneven distribution suggests that the field might be generated by dynamo action closer to the surface, above the layer of metallic hydrogen. Every flyby we execute gets us closer to determining where and how Jupiters dynamo works.

Understanding its magnetic field will add another piece to the puzzle of Jupiters interior. While planetary scientists assume it to be mostly hydrogen, the true composition, density and structure remain unknown. Scientists assume that the crushing pressures create a large layer of metallic hydrogen in the planets interior with a rocky core beneath, but definitive evidence is still lacking. Juno is also taking gravitational measurements as it orbits, which should give us more information about the interior as additional data becomes available.

In addition to looking below Jupiters clouds, the researchers wanted to see what happens above them, where charged particles from both the sun and within Jupiter interact with its magnetic field, creating huge auroras. Juno first encountered the shroud of particles last summer when it passed through the bow shock, a sort of shock wave created when Jupiters magnetic field shunts particles from the solar wind aside.The bow shock seems to have been moving outward as Juno passed through it, the researchers say.

Continued here:

Juno results offer tantalizing hints of Jupiter's secrets - Astronomy Magazine

The citations found at the end of research papers serve several purposes, like providing background on the current work and giving proper credit where its due. They can also, according to a new study, reveal decades worth of trends in whole fields of science.

A trio of researchers have waded though more than half a century of research published in astronomy journals and found that studies authored by women receive 10 percent fewer citations than similar studies written by men.

Neven Caplar of the Swiss university ETH Zurich and his colleagues analyzed more than 149,700 papers published between 1950 and 2015 in five journals: Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Nature and Science. They made sure that the papers being cited matched up in variables unrelated to gender, like the lead authors seniority in the field, the institutions they wrote from, the total number of authors on the paper, the number of references, the year and journal in which it was published, and the specific field of study. They say their findings, published Friday in Nature Astronomy, quantify the effect of gender bias in citations within astronomy research.

If there were no gender bias in astronomy research and only these factors mattered, the researchers analysis predicts that men would actually receive 4 percent fewer citations than women would. So their actual results were surprisingto the algorithms, at least. In the context of history, their findings are not surprising at all.

Since the late 1990s, women in the United States have earned nearly 60 percent of all bachelors degrees, but about half of all degrees in science and engineering fields, according to the National Science Foundation. The number of women receiving degrees in science is on the rise, but women remain outnumbered in many of these fields, particularly in physics, engineering, and computer science. In 2013, an analysis of more than 8 million papers in the fields of natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities showed that men are more likely to be listed as lead authors. So it follows that with fewer women getting degrees, becoming researchers and professors, contributing to papers, and then leading papers, there are fewer women to cite.

Some of the gender disparity can be attributed to the nature of the workforce. Most science professionals got their degrees in the last 40 years, and those people tend to be disproportionately male and white, National Science Foundation statistics show. A 2014 report on an annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society found that although the gender ratio of speakers matched that of the audience, more men than women asked questions of the participants. The researchers in this study interpreted this observation to be a product of the workforce. More senior scientists may be more likely to ask questions, they wrote, and senior scientists are usually men. Another survey of participants at a National Astronomy Meeting, organized by Britains Royal Astronomical Society, made similar observations about question-askers. A 2016 survey of more than 13,000 requests for use of the European Southern Observatory over eight years found that female applicants had significantly lower chances of getting telescope time. The study attributed this result to the effects of seniority; only 34 percent of the women applying were professionally employed astronomers, compared to 53 percent of the men.

Critics of the effect described in the Nature Astronomy study could argue that researchers seek to use the best sources in their work, regardless of gender. Any perceived preference for male-led work surely must be unintentional. But research has shown that when gender is taken out of consideration, potential implicit biases fade away and the scales balance. In 2001, the journal Behavioral Ecology started using a double-blind review that masked the genders of the applicants being evaluated. This led to a significant increase in female first-authored papers, a pattern not observed in a very similar journal that provides reviewers with author information, according to a paper that examined the policy. No negative effects could be identified. A similar effect has been found in hiring. In a 2012 study, researchers simulated an application process for a laboratory manager job, randomly assigning applicants either a male or female name. The applicants, members of faculty at a research university, were given identical credentials for the applicants. Yet the participantsboth male and female facultyrated the male applicant as significantly more competent than his female counterpart. Even scientists, some of the loudest advocates for objectivity, are not immune to deeply rooted differences in the perception of men and women.

The Nature Astronomy study does have some encouraging findings. The number of astronomy papers authored by women has increased over the last 50 years, and the difference between the number of female-led and male-led papers in citations has shrunk, the researchers write. They found that back in the 1950s and 1960s, men received between 50 percent and 100 percent more citations than women did.

The average number of citations in a paper has also increased, from about 10 in the 1960s to about 60 today, providing room for more authors to be recognized and credited, male or female. But the disparity persists, in astronomy and likely elsewhere, and even in the very study that examined it. Of the 19 authors cited in the paper, just six are women.

See the rest here:

Study: Female Astronomers are Cited Less Frequently - The Atlantic - The Atlantic

This image shows Jupiters south pole, as seen by NASAs Juno spacecraft from an altitude of 32,000 miles (52,000 kilometres). Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Betsy Asher Hall/Gervasio Robles

The first months of observations of the solar systems biggest planet from NASAs Juno spacecraft have revealed huge swirling polar cyclones, previously-undetected structures and motions beneath Jupiters distinctive clouds, and the first evidence for what lies at the core of the gas giant, scientists said Thursday.

There was plenty scientists did not know about the planet when the Juno spacecraft left Earth in 2011, and the probe has sought answers to questions about Jupiters interior, magnetic field, auroras and radiation belts, and used a visible light camera to capture the first direct views of the poles.

The general theme of our discoveries is really how different Jupiter looks from what we expected, said Scott Bolton, Junos principal investigator at the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio. Juno, in many ways, is looking inside Jupiter for the first time, close-up and personal.

Since Juno arrived at its destination July 4, 2016, to wrap up a five-year interplanetary trip, the spacecraft, built and operated by Lockheed Martin, has circled Jupiter six times in an oval-shaped loop that extends a few million miles at its farthest point. Each lap takes more than 53 days, and Juno speedily skirts within 3,000 miles (5,000 kilometres) Jupiters cloud tops at closest approach.

Junos science instruments collect most of their data when the orbiter is near Jupiter, taking pictures, measuring plasma and electrons, and probing deep inside the planet to find out what is hidden under its cloudy veneer.

Many scientists thought Jupiter was relatively boring and uniform inside before Juno arrived, Bolton said.

For decades, scientists have assumed this, that if we drop below the cloud tops, below where the sunlight reaches, that pretty much Jupiter was all uniform inside, and it really didnt matter where you looked, it would all look the same, Bolton said Thursday. And what were finding is anything but that is the truth. Its very different and very complex.

Junos microwave radiometer, an instrumentsimilar to those aboard climate satellites looking down on Earth, gathers sounding measurements to peer below the red-orange tapestry of Jupiters cloud tops.

The radiometer is tuned to six wavelengths, detecting thermal radiation emitted from different layers of the atmosphere from the storm clouds and jet streams to as deep as 300 miles, or about 500 kilometers.

Going into Junos mission, scientists anticipated Jupiters atmosphere to be relatively consistent deeper than 60 miles, or 100 kilometers. Instead, Junos microwave radiometer discovered a belt of ammonia around Jupiters equator, and variations in ammonia abundances at other latitudes extending deep into the planets atmosphere.

This was completely unexpected, Bolton said. You have a deep band of ammonia that goes from the top of Jupiter as deep as we can see. It goes down to 350 kilometres (217 miles) because thats the limit of where were looking.

The ammonia band may penetrate even deeper inside Jupiter, Bolton said.

What this is telling us is that Jupiter is not very well-mixed, Bolton said. Its not all uniform inside. The idea of, once you drop below the sunlight, that everything would all be uniform, boring and mixed up was completely wrong. Its actually very different depending on where you look.

The findings suggest more ammonia farther down in Jupiters atmosphere, and the ammonia detections appear to have no relationship with the zones and belts of clouds visible in pictures from space.

Thats really going to force us to rethink not only how Jupiter works, but how do we explore Saturn, Uranus and Neptune if they are highly variable like this? Bolton said.

Other parts of Junos scientific sensor suite are mapping Jupiters gravity field to learn about the heart of the planet.

When we went to go measure the gravity field, what we were really looking for was the core whether there was a compact core or no core, Bolton said. Instead, what we found was that it really looks fuzzy. There may be a core there, but its very big, and it may be partially dissolved. Were studying that, but that came as a big surprise to us that there was no core.

Theories about Jupiters core before Juno arrived predominately predicted the planet either had a small, dense rocky core between one and 10 times as massive as Earth, or no core at all, scientists said.

Most scientists were in one camp or the other, and what we found was really neither was true, Bolton said. There may be a little bit of a compact core, but there may be layers there, and there seems to be a fuzzy core that may be much larger than anybody had anticipated.

The gravity data that weve gotten thus far is not really consistent with just a small compact core or zero core, but it is somewhat consistent with a large fuzzy core that may be partially dissolved, Bolton said. Its also consistent, maybe, with some deep motions, or zonal winds and things like that dictating the interior of Jupiters dynamics, which are very different than historically models have assumed.

Jupiters intense magnetic field, the strongest of any planet in the solar system, has also been interrogated by Juno, which has a magnetometer mounted at the end of one of the crafts three solar array wings.

Jack Connerney, Junos deputy principal investigator at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, described the magnetometer as like a fancy compass that can measure the direction and strength of Jupiters magnetic field.

Juno has come closer to Jupiter than any mission before, and proximity yields better magnetic field measurements, Connerney said.

What we found in our first few passes is that the magnetic field was both stronger than we expected where we expected it to be strong, and it was weaker than we expected where we expected it to be weak, Connerney said. In other words, it evidenced a dramatic spatial variation that we were not quite aware of previously.

The fluctuations detected by Juno suggest the spacecraft is unexpectedly close to the magnetic fields source, or dynamo.

Scientists thought the magnetic field might be generated in a global pool of liquid metallic hydrogen in Jupiters middle layer somewhere between the center of the planet and the atmosphere. Squeezed at extreme pressure, the deep layer of hydrogen is liquified and conducts electricity.

The magnetic field expands outward from Jupiter and is blown back by the solar wind like a comets tail. The magnetic field bubble, called a magnetosphere, is similar to one around Earth, but Jupiters is so immense it would be the size of the full moon in the sky, if it was visible with the naked eye.

Junos observations might mean that the dynamo is above that metallic hydrogen region, Connerney said, perhaps in an envelope of molecular hydrogen.

An infrared camera and ultraviolet spectrometer aboard the Juno spacecraft have been looking at Jupiters powerful polar auroras, producing another set of observations that surprised scientists.

It turns out some of the auroral light emissions seem to be produced by electrons streaming out of Jupiters atmosphere, not by charged particles riding field lines into the planet, as is the case with Earths auroras. One of Junos instruments, an electron detector, found particles moving upward as the orbiter soared over Jupiters south pole.

According to Connerney, the electrons are probably drawn out of the planet along the same field lines scientists thought would see the particles into Jupiter.

As theyre leaving, they collide with hydrogen molecules and excite ultraviolet emissions, Connerney said. Itsa 180-degree turnabout from the way we were thinking about those emissions prior to the Juno observations.

NASAs Cassini spacecraft, in the final months of its mission, is now orbiting Saturn on a trajectory similar to Junos. Bolton said scientists are eager to compare observations from the two craft to compare the solar systems two largest planets.

Cassini doesnt have the exact same kind of instruments we have, and of course, were tuned to do this interior research, but it has a lot of great instruments that can learn a lot about the interior and other things that it can do close-up, said Bolton, who is also a member of the Cassini science team.

Were both trying to figure out our data from our own planets at the moment, but eventually we will compare, and of course, thats the key to scientific advancement comparative study, Bolton said. So being able to compare Cassinis measurements at Saturn and Jupiters measurements by Juno, we will reallybe able to advance our understanding how these giant planets work.

Junos camera has scanned Jupiter during each pass over the planets poles, catching dozens of swirling storms in the act, some the size of Earth.

The Juno team relies on amateur observers and image processors logged in to the missions website to crunch raw views from JunoCam and create colorful mosaics.

What you see are incredible, complex features, Bolton said. These cyclones and anticyclones all over the poles. That wasnt really expected.

The bluish hue is probably real, he said of one south pole mosaic. And the biggest feature is that Jupiter, from the poles, doesnt look anything like it does from the equator.

Our usual picture of Jupiter has zones and belts, the Great Red Spot, and you see these stripes, and thats the Jupiter weve all known and grown to love, Bolton said. When you look from the pole, it looks totally different. If you looked at this picture, and somebody had shown it to you a few years ago, I dont think anybody would have guessed this is Jupiter.

Mission managers tacked on the JunoCam imager to the spacecrafts instrument package after NASA selected Juno for development in 2005. JunoCam was not originally part of the Juno mission, but officials added the camera as a public outreach tool.

Scientists said JunoCams imagery adds context to their data analysis work, but it also engages a broader community of professional and amateur scientists, space enthusiasts and artists.

The contributions of the amateurs are essential, said Candy Hansen, Juno co-investigator at the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona. I cannot understate how important the contributions are. We dont have a way to plan our data without the contributions of the amateur astronomers.

We dont have a big image processing team, so we are completely relying on the help of our citizen scientists, Hansen said.

JunoCam collects images in strips as the spacecraft spins on its main axis, and contributors stitch the strips together to make pictures.

What I find the most phenomenal of all is that this takes real work, Hansen said. When you download a JunoCam image and process it, its not something you do in five minutes. The pictures that we get that people upload back onto our site, theyve invested hours and hours of their own time, and then generously returned that to us.

Hansen said JunoCam has spotted tiny features suspended above Jupiters main cloud deck that look like squall lines on Earth. The clouds are dwarfed by Jupiters enormous scale, but they actually stretch around 30 miles, or 50 kilometers, across, she said.

I keep saying (theyre tiny), but theyre really not tiny at all, Hansen said. Theyre up above the cloud deck at a pressure level where the temperature is going to be very cold, so what youre seeing is most likely ice crystals of water ice and ammonia ice.

Junos next close-up encounter with Jupiter is set for July 11, when the orbiter will pass above the Great Red Spot for the first time.

The discoveries made by Juno so far are making us rethink how giant planets work, not just in our own solar system, but giant planets are really important throughout the galaxy and the Universe, Bolton said.

Were getting the first really close-up and personal look at Jupiter, and were seeing that a lot of our ideas were incorrect, and maybe naive, that its very complex, and there are a lot of deep motions going on, he added.

NASA decided in February to forego an engine burn to move Juno into a 14-day orbit with a tighter path around Jupiter after engineers detected a problem with check valves inside the crafts propulsion system last year.

Junos mission will last until at least February 2018, enough time to make 11 science orbits around Jupiter, instead of the 32 laps originally planned. But NASA could extend the mission another three years to give Juno more flybys near Jupiter.

Theres a theme here. There are motions going on just beneath the clouds that we see with the microwaves, and there may be very deep winds and deep motions going on that we see with the gravity field (sensors), Bolton said. Its hard to say yet, but more data will tell us how deep those really go. Were just at the beginning of this mission, where eventually were going to map out that planet.

Email the author.

Follow Stephen Clark on Twitter: @StephenClark1.

Read this article:

[ 27 May 2017 ] Jupiter surprises in first trove of data from NASA's Juno mission News - Astronomy Now Online

Everything to do with Astronomy:

A hobby of humanity since the dawn of time, and the scientific study of celestial objects.

"Astronomy compels the soul to look upward, and leads us from this world to another."

"We are a way for the cosmos to know itself."

Looking for your first telescope?

Here are a few articles to help you make an informed decision:

More helpful information

What to view tonight

What Was That Bright Object Flying Over My House?

Sister Sub-Reddits

Fair Warning:

Rage/Meme Comics, Spam links and disrespectful comments will be removed.

Repeat and/or serious offenses will earn you a ban.

The downvote button is disabled until further notice. Too many newcomers were having their posts downvoted into oblivion. If a post doesn't belong here (rage/meme comics, blog spam, etc.), please use the "report" button.

Please avoid multiple exclamation marks, excessive CAPS, or editorialize in your submission titles. Nine times out ot ten, the actual article title is perfectly usable.

If you plan to post a pic, ask yourself "Would this appear in an Astronomy Magazine?" If the answer is no, submit to /r/pics instead. What this means is that your self-taken photos of stars, planets, etc are welcome, but refrain from posting pics that are tangentially related to astronomy, at best.

Remember, keep looking up!

Read the original post:

Astronomy r/Astronomy - reddit.com

From its dynamic atmosphere to its hidden depths, the Juno spacecraft has Jupiter as never before surprising NASA scientists with unexpected complexity.

ASKAP, the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder has only had a 3.4-day pilot survey and has already found a fast radio burst!

Two recent studies suggest that brown dwarfs, or so-called failed stars, are nevertheless more like stars than planets.

Astronomers have confirmed the existence of the seventh planet around the ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1.

Mars was once far wetter than it is now but just how much rain fell, and when?

Tabby's star, otherwise known as the most mysterious star in the galaxy, is dipping drastically in brightness, giving astronomers an opportunity to figure out what has been causing this star's weird behavior.

A team of researchers led by Benjamin Black (City College of New York) used global drainage patterns of Titan, Earth, and Mars' surfaces to determine the likelihood of recent tectonic activity.

A magnetic field appears to span the space between the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, the two dwarf galaxies being consumed by our Milky Way Galaxy.

Want to take your eclipse-photography experience to the next level? Get tips on advanced techniques from Fred Espenak, a.k.a. "Mr. Eclipse," during S&T's live webinar on Tuesday, May 23rd. There are now just three months to go until August 21st's total eclipse of the Sun. And, like me, you're probably wondering how much time and

In just a month, teams will guide this 300-pound, 6-foot-tall humanoid robot in a series of simulated trials as part of NASAs Space Robotics Challenge.

A brand new supernova in NGC 6946 is bright enough to see in modest-sized telescopes. Here's how to find it.

Astronomers have detected water in the cloud-free skies of "warm Neptune" HAT-P-26b, a clue in the larger mystery of how these planets formed.

Large asteroid 2014 JO25 cruised past Earth on April 19, and Goldstone and Arecibo radars were at the ready to capture what turned out to be yet another twin-lobed asteroid.

Another binocular comet? You better believe it. Comet Johnson takes center stage at nightfall this month and next.

The Chambliss Amateur Achievement Award recognizes excellence in astronomical research by American amateur astronomers. Nominations are now open!

Astronomers have discovered an "iceball Earth" orbiting a star 13,000 light-years away. Multiple eyes on the sky have revealed some of this world's secrets.

The Grand Finale is underway, as NASA's Cassini spacecraft sails through a clear gap between Saturn and its rings.

Ten years ago, La Palma was declared a "Starlight Reserve" and measures were implemented to protect its skies from light pollution. How did they work?

A new galaxy survey suggests that a supervoid isnt responsible for the Cold Spot seen in the cosmic microwave background the oddity may have a far more ancient origin.

Listen to May's astronomy podcast to learn why stargazers think of the Big Dipper as the "Swiss Army Knife" of the late-spring northern sky.

Cassini's Grand Finale has begun, as the spacecraft threaded the needle between Saturn and its rings, following several fantastic moon passes and a final glance back at Earth.

Amateur astronomy clubs, planetariums, science museums, and parks celebrate Astronomy Day twice a year, when the public is invited to come learn about the sky and view through telescopes.

The U.S. Postal Service's new Total Eclipse Forever stamp will feature photos by the well-know eclipse expert Fred Espenak, who is also a master of many different kinds of astrophotography.

The universe sings to us in gravitational waves, and we're starting to listen. Michelle Thaller discusses the discovery of gravitational waves and their unusual effects in her latest astronomy podcast.

OBJECTIVE REALITY EXISTS. It was a protest sign that I never imagined I would carry on a crowded all-night bus to a march for science in Washington, DC.

Continued here:

Astronomy News & Current Events | Sky & Telescope

Astronomy (ISSN0091-6358) is a monthly American magazine about astronomy. Targeting amateur astronomers for its readers, it contains columns on sky viewing, reader-submitted astrophotographs, and articles on astronomy and astrophysics that are readable by nonscientists.

Astronomy is a magazine about the science and hobby of astronomy. Based near Milwaukee in Waukesha, Wisconsin, it is produced by Kalmbach Publishing. Astronomys readers include those interested in astronomy, and those who want to know about sky events, observing techniques, astrophotography, and amateur astronomy in general.

Astronomy was founded in 1973 by Stephen A. Walther, a graduate of the University of WisconsinStevens Point and amateur astronomer. The first issue, August 1973, consisted of 48 pages with five feature articles and information about what to see in the sky that month. Issues contained astrophotos and illustrations created by astronomical artists. Walther had worked part time as a planetarium lecturer at the University of WisconsinMilwaukee and developed an interest in photographing constellations at an early age. Although even in childhood he was interested to obsession in Astronomy, he did so poorly in mathematics that his mother despaired that he would ever be able to earn a living. However he graduated in Journalism from the University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, and as a senior class project he created a business plan for a magazine for amateur astronomers. With the help of his brother David, he was able to bring the magazine to fruition.[citation needed]. He died in 1977.

AstroMedia Corp., the company Walther had founded to publish Astronomy, brought in Richard Berry as editor. Berry also created the offshoot Odyssey, aimed at young readers, and the specialized Telescope Making. In 1985, Milwaukee hobby publisher Kalmbach bought Astronomy.

In 1992, Richard Berry left the magazine and Robert Burnham took over as chief editor. Kalmbach discontinued Deep Sky and Telescope Making magazines and sold Odyssey. In 1996 Bonnie Gordon, now a professor at Central Arizona College, assumed the editorship. David J. Eicher, the creator of "Deep Sky," became chief editor in 2002.

The Astronomy staff also produces other publications. These have included Explore the Universe; Beginners Guide to Astronomy; Origin and Fate of the Universe; Mars: Explore the Red Planet's Past, Present, and Future; Atlas of the Stars; Cosmos; and 50 Greatest Mysteries of the Universe. There also was, for a time in the mid-2000s, a Brazilian edition published by Duetto Editora called Astronomy Brasil. However, due mainly to low circulation numbers, Duetto ceased its publication in September 2007.

Astronomy publishes articles about the hobby and science of astronomy. Generally, the front half of the magazine reports on professional science, while the back half of the magazine presents items of interest to hobbyists. Science articles cover such topics as cosmology, space exploration, exobiology, research conducted by professional-class observatories, and individual professional astronomers. Each issue of Astronomy contains a foldout star map showing the evening sky for the current month and the positions of planets, and some comets.

The magazine has regular columnists. They include science writer Bob Berman, who writes a column called Bob Bermans Strange Universe. Stephen James OMeara writes Stephen James OMearas Secret Sky, which covers observing tips and stories relating to deep-sky objects, planets, and comets. Glenn Chaple writes "Glenn Chaples Observing Basics", a beginners column. Phil Harrington writes "Phil Harringtons Binocular Universe", about observing with binoculars. "Telescope Insider" interviews people who are a part of the telescope-manufacturing industry.

In each issue of Astronomy Magazine, readers will find star and planet charts, telescope observing tips and techniques, and advice on taking photography of the night sky.[2] The magazine also publishes reader-submitted photos in a gallery, lists astronomy-related events, letters from readers, news, and announcements of new products.

Astronomy may include special sections bound into the magazine, such as booklets or posters. Recent examples have included a Messier Catalog booklet, poster showing comet C/2006 P1 (McNaught) and historical comets, a Skyguide listing upcoming sky events, a Telescope Buyer's Guide; a poster titled "Atlas of Extrasolar Planets"; and a poster showing the life cycles of stars.

Astronomy is the largest circulation astronomy magazine, with monthly circulation of 114,080.[3] The majority of its readers are in the United States, but it is also circulated in Canada and internationally.[4]

Its major competitor is Sky & Telescope magazine with a circulation of 80,023.[3]

More:

Astronomy (magazine) - Wikipedia