Insight – This bitcoin chaos will blow up your cyberpunk utopia – The Star Online

BITCOINS wild gyrations in 2021 have made sure of one thing: The future of money will be electronic, but it wont remotely resemble a cyberpunk utopia. Peoples power will bow to sovereigns might.

The mania and panic that have gripped decentralised cryptocurrencies are heightening the attraction of their coming rivals: digital cash, issued by central banks. These tokens will be staid, centralised and state-controlled. Thats exactly what users will want in an Internet of Things world where machines need to settle claims with one another all the time, instantaneously, but without contributing to global warming.

Official electronic coins will be a new type of central bank liability alongside physical cash, though for investors betting on the future value of the dollar, yen or the euro, they wont be a novel asset class.

That has clear advantages. To avoid becoming a lightning rod for fresh speculation means that a global economy powered by FedCoin, digital euro and Chinas e-CNY will make far less onerous demands on energy resources than cryptocurrencies. In the absence of a trusted intermediary, the mining, or proof-of-work protocol that keeps the blockchain secure from double-spending attacks, requires power-guzzling hardware. Between bitcoin and ethereum, the electricity consumed can light up 16 million American households.

Not so for the distributed ledgers that will verify transfers of official coins. These ledgers will only be held by a select group of intermediaries with the central banks permission. Instead of being in a race to solve puzzles faster than malicious actors, as we see with decentralised cryptocurrencies, the nodes in the network can lock their own funds to back legitimate transactions.

This approach, known as proof-of-stake, will require a fraction of the energy proof-of-work needs. Ethereum intends to switch.

The cryptocurrency ether will replace hardware and electricity as the investment needed to secure the network. Validators will earn fees by locking up at least 32 ether. (Thats a US$72,000 (RM298,504.80) commitment as I write.) If they misbehave, go offline or fail to do their job, the processors can lose their collateral.

A central authority can perhaps run such a network better. After all, those who are vouchsafing transactions must have skin in the game, as they claim and somebody trustworthy must ensure that they do. As Chi Lo, an economist at BNP Paribas Asset Management Asia, says: A holders identity is inevitably required for verification of balances on a digital ledger. Who has the legal identity of coin holders? The government!

Central banks that arent constrained by how much fiat money they can create out of thin air use that flexibility to avoid catastrophe, as they did recently during the Covid-19 pandemic. By contrast, a bitcoin-ised economy can be dangerous because of finite money supply. As Lo says, if you fix nominal variables, real output has to adjust violently to absorb any economic shocks.

Besides, perfect anonymity of cryptocurrencies is impractical. It comes with unacceptably high risks of money laundering and terror financing. Governments do not want to pry into all or even most online transactions. But they wont give up their right to lift the veil of pseudonyms when they want. Hence, the interest worldwide in digital cash. Chinas plans are most advanced, but other central banks are also in the fray.

If cryptocurrency adoption is a headache for governments, an overwhelming popularity of digital cash could also be an issue. Banks could lose deposits should customers prefer having a direct claim on their monetary authorities. Lenders financing long-term loans with short-term market liquidity might get into trouble later. These risks arent new. But by ignoring them to a point where subprime mortgage-linked banking losses had to be socialised, authorities created a trust gap with the public: Techno-anarchists burst through it with the template for an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust.

More than a decade later, the cyberpunk movements success is to be measured not by the highly volatile, speculative asset class it has helped spawn and popularise, but by the rising influence of blockchain technology within the traditional financial system. Digital cash with in-built, self-executing software code will alter the future of money in a way that cryptocurrencies never could. Tokens will win. But trust wont lose. Bloomberg

Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services. The views expressed here are the writers own.

See original here:

Insight - This bitcoin chaos will blow up your cyberpunk utopia - The Star Online