Russian military buildup in the Arctic has northern NATO members uneasy – DefenseNews.com

COLOGNE, Germany Russias continued military investments in the Arctic may spur NATO to accord the region a more prominent focus in the alliances defense planning, according to Nordic officials and analysts.

The push comes amid a delicate dance by northern European governments to both deter and cooperate with Moscow simultaneous efforts that risk drowning in a pit of fresh geopolitical ambitions laid bare by climate change.

A warming Arctic is opening new fronts of competition in the resource-rich region even faraway China is getting involved that could spill over into a security problem for the alliance. If that happens, NATO should have a strategy in place to manage the conflict, the thinking goes.

You have so many components for a classic security dilemma increasing in the Arctic, Anna Wieslander, the Stockholm-based director of the Atlantic Councils Northern Europe program, said in an interview. Its not about immediately putting more surveillance up there, or more troops and military installations; its more about getting a joint understanding of how to deal with it and find ways forward, if its possible, with the Russians.

NATO member Norway, which shares a border with Russia, has long walked the line between alarm over Russias military buildup on the nearby Kola Peninsula, home to Russias Northern Fleet, and seeking good neighborly relations on fisheries management and coast guard cooperation.

The Norwegian military headquarters and the Northern Fleet headquarters near Murmansk have maintained a hotline even after Oslo cut all other defense ties following Russias annexation of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014.

We are working on an open dialogue with Russia, Norwegian Defence Minister Frank Bakke-Jensen said at a March 19 virtual conference organized by the Atlantic Council. The idea is to lift whatever successful instruments are still in place, he added, namely the joint search-and-rescue service and the crisis telecommunications channel.

But Norwegian officials are getting increasingly spooked by Russian long-range missiles, new underwater weaponry and naval exercises inching closer to the coastlines of NATO allies. They see Moscow returning to a version of the Cold War-era bastion concept, a kind of area-denial strategy that sought to create safe waters for Soviet nuclear submarines to stage a nuclear counterstrike in the case of an atomic war.

Sign up for our Early Bird Brief Get the defense industry's most comprehensive news and information straight to your inbox

Subscribe

Enter a valid email address (please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, The Democratic Republic of The Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Thanks for signing up!

By giving us your email, you are opting in to the Early Bird Brief.

We cannot shy away from the fact that the security landscape in the Arctic is getting more difficult, said Ine Eriksen Soreide, Norways foreign minister. We dont see Russia as a direct threat to Norway, but we see more and more signaling towards NATO and thereby Norway as a NATO member.

With little appetite for the eight-nation Arctic Council to pick up military and defense topics, that leaves the alliance as the logical forum for crisis prevention and management in the High North, according to analysts. The fact that the Biden administration has rejoined the Paris Agreement to battle climate change has given a boost to the prospect of increased cooperation through NATO.

The alliance has found itself in something of a soul-searching mode for about a year, brooding over a reform process known as NATO 2030. In addition, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg wants members to agree on a strategic concept that takes into account new challenges connected with Russia and China.

That period of introspection could open new avenues for anchoring Arctic security topics on the trans-Atlantic agenda.

The strategic concept should highlight that NATO has a role in the Arctic, Henning Vaglum, the director general for security policy at Norways Defence Ministry, said at the Atlantic Council event. There have historically been some doubts about that.

However, U.S. policymakers dont view the region as a source of imminent conflict.

Its the region where, in many respects, the status quo is enviable, said James DeHart, the U.S. State Departments coordinator for the Arctic region.

Im not downplaying the risks here, he added. We have to have our eyes open.

At the same time, Pentagon officials are cleareyed that tensions elsewhere could quickly spill over to the High North. We have to be able to connect some dots and think forward about what we should be anticipating from Russia in the region, said Jennifer Walsh, a senior Defense Department policy official.

While Moscows current objective may be to bolster its territorial defense in the Arctic, how far will it go to increase its oversight or control of northern sea routes? she wondered.

The same goes for China, Walsh said. With Beijings stated ambitions to be a player in the region, its attempts to influence existing Arctic governance mechanisms should be judged in light of its behavior elsewhere.

But how NATO could realize a planning mandate for the Arctic remains to be seen, according to analysts.

NATO as an institution has not dealt that much with the Arctic, leaving the heavy lifting to individual countries of the region, said Wieslander of the Atlantic Council think tank.

If you have an increased amount of military activity but you [dont have a] political forum to put these activities into some kind of perspective, then you have a problem, she told Defense News.

Regionally focused alliance groups on the Baltic and Black Sea regions, which produced common threat assessments, could serve as a model, the analyst argued.

The Baltic Sea focus, in particular, could help shift attention to the Arctic, Wieslander said. Its one strategic area, and the theaters are really interconnected. You could easily expand upward those discussions.

Follow this link:
Russian military buildup in the Arctic has northern NATO members uneasy - DefenseNews.com