Opinion: Free speech cant be filtered through a bureaucratic superstructure – Financial Post

Breadcrumb Trail Links

The government wants you to believe its targeting hate speech, when in reality its targeting free speech

Author of the article:

Free speech ensures that Canadians have the right to tell governments when theyre wrong. While this may be unpleasant for governments, it is absolutely vital in a democratic society.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Rather than strengthening Canadians rights, the Trudeau government wants to filter free speech through the lens of a bureaucratic superstructure. There can be no doubt that there are bad things on the internet. Child pornography, hate speech, and other such crimes are detestable. But these crimes are already labelled as such through the criminal code with lengthy prison sentences for those who are convicted.

If the federal government wants to review these laws, thats a discussion worth having. However, it is an entirely separate issue.

The government wants you to believe its targeting hate speech, when in reality its targeting free speech. Experts say that the Trudeau governments new proposed online harms law would fundamentally weaken free speech in Canada and would require a costly bureaucratic superstructure to enforce all of the governments new rules.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

As University of Ottawa Law Professor Michael Geistput it, the government seems to treat freedom of speech as a danger to be constrained rather than a right to be defended. The planned legislation wouldcreatefour new government bodies, which would become the foundation of a costly new bureaucratic superstructure.

The new bodies include a Digital Safety Commission, led by a commissioner appointed by the federal cabinet, and an advisory board composed of seven members chosen by the Minister of Heritage. The commissioner and advisory board would be taskedwith identifying content that should not be kept online and would refer that content to a new tribunal.

Does anyone really believe a commissioner appointed by cabinet and an advisory board appointed by the minister of heritage would be completely impartial in identifying what should be removed online?

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Of course not.

If these new bodies were created today, all eight bureaucrats would be appointed by the Trudeau cabinet. Does that sound fair, balanced, and neutral? Some of the powers that would be handed to the new tribunal are reminiscent of the Ministry of Truth in George Orwells 1984. The tribunal, acting on the recommendations of the commissioner, could order online communication services like Facebook and Twitter to take down any content the government deems harmful.

These platforms would have to address any complaints within 24 hours. Failing to remove content could lead to anindictable offenseand fines of up to$25 million. These undemocratic proposals seem eerily similar to those supported by authoritarian regimes.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Canadians shouldnt have to rely on a hope and a prayer that bureaucrats appointed by a partisan government will safeguard our right to criticize that very same government. To put the cherry on top of this disastrous cake, the Trudeau governments new bureaucratic superstructure would cost taxpayers millions of dollars a year.

Online communications services would faceregulatory chargesto do business in Canada, which no doubt will be passed onto consumers.

The governments new proposals amount to a dangerous shift toward state censorship. Canadians, not bureaucrats, should be able to determine exactly how and why they want to criticize the government online. With an election just weeks away, now is the perfect time to have a vigorous national debate about government censorship.

Jay Goldberg is the Interim Ontario Director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

In-depth reporting on the innovation economy from The Logic, brought to you in partnership with the Financial Post.

Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Financial Post Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

See more here:
Opinion: Free speech cant be filtered through a bureaucratic superstructure - Financial Post