Legal expert: Trumps liberate Tweets incite insurrection and thats illegal – AlterNet

President Donald Trump may have gotten more than he bargained for Friday, when he posted three tweets, just sixteen words in total, that stunned and infuriated the nation and have legal experts weighing in on just how much trouble he could be in.

One, a former U.S. Dept. of Justice official, suggests possibly a lot.

But first, the tweets:

The average Trump supporter might say, So? Or, as Trump has often defended his actions, he has a First Amendment right to say what he wants.

Both are wrong, according to Mary McCord, a former Acting Assistant Attorney General for National Security at the U.S. Department of Justice, and former Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division, according to her bio at Georgetown Law, where she is a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center.

If all thats not enough, McCord currently serves as the Legal Director at the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP).

In other words, she knows what shes talking about. And what shes saying, in a just-published Washington Post op-ed, is Trumps actions meet the definition of inciting insurrection, and inciting insurrection is illegal.

President Trump incited insurrection Friday against the duly elected governors of the states of Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia, McCord begins. Just a day after issuing guidance for re-opening America that clearly deferred decision-making to state officials as it must under our Constitutional order the president undercut his own guidance by calling for criminal acts against the governors for not opening fast enough.

The op-eds subtitle notes: Federal law bans advocating the overthrow of government.

Theres a lot more, but she sets up her argument well.

Liberate particularly when its declared by the chief executive of our republic isnt some sort of cheeky throwaway, McCord continues. Its definition is to set at liberty, specifically to free (something, such as a country) from domination by a foreign power. We historically associate it with the armed defeat of hostile forces during war, such as the liberation of Western Europe from Nazi Germanys control during World War II. Just over a year ago, Trump himself announced that the United States has liberated all ISIS-controlled territory in Syria and Iraq.'

In that context, its not at all unreasonable to consider Trumps tweets about liberation as at least tacit encouragement to citizens to take up arms against duly elected state officials of the party opposite his own, in response to sometimes unpopular but legally issued stay-at-home orders.

McCord also says and this is important for the naysaying MAGA KAGs in the back, we cant write these tweets off as just hyperbole or political banter.

And thats why these tweets arent protected free speech. Although generally advocating for the use of force or violation of law is protected (as hard to conceive as that may be when the statements are made by someone in a position of public trust, like the president of the United States), the Supreme Court has previously articulated that where such advocacy is inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action, it loses its First Amendment protection.

Read McCords entire op-ed here.

then let us make a small request. AlterNets journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. Were here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And were proud to say that weve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 yearslonger than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

Its through the generosity of our supporters that were able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone cant pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Go here to read the rest:
Legal expert: Trumps liberate Tweets incite insurrection and thats illegal - AlterNet