WASHINGTON Republican senators allied with President Trump are increasingly arguing that the Senate should not call witnesses or subpoena documents for his impeachment trial because Mr. Trump has threatened to invoke executive privilege, and a legal fight would take too long to resolve.
But it is far from clear that Mr. Trump has the power to gag or delay a witness who is willing to comply with a subpoena and tell the Senate what he knows about the presidents interactions with Ukraine anyway as Mr. Trumps former national security adviser John R. Bolton has said he would do.
Here is an explanation of executive privilege legal issues.
It is a power that presidents can sometimes use to keep information secret.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution implicitly gives presidents the authority to keep internal communications, especially those involving their close White House aides, secret under certain circumstances. The idea is that if officials fear that Congress might someday gain access to their private communications, it would chill the candor of the advice presidents receive and inhibit their ability to carry out their constitutionally assigned duties.
Not by itself.
The privilege has traditionally been wielded as a shield, not a sword. It has no built-in enforcement mechanism to prevent a former official from complying with a subpoena in defiance of a presidents orders, or to punish one afterward for having done so.
Mr. Bolton, one of the four current and former officials whom Democrats want to call as a witness, has said that he will show up to testify if the Senate subpoenas him for the impeachment trial, even though the White House has told him not to disclose what he knows about Mr. Trumps private statements and actions toward Ukraine.
A valid assertion of the privilege would protect a current or former official who chooses not to comply with a subpoena.
Three other officials Democrats want to call as witnesses Mr. Trumps acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney; a top national-security aide to Mr. Mulvaney, Robert Blair; and Michael Duffey, an official in the White House budget office who handled the military aid to Ukraine are expected to resist appearing if subpoenaed.
Normally it is a crime to defy a subpoena, but the Justice Department will decline to prosecute a recalcitrant official if the president invokes the privilege. Congress can also sue that official seeking a court order, but the department, defending that official, will cite the privilege to argue that case should be dismissed and as grounds to appeal any ruling that the subpoena is nevertheless valid, keeping the case going.
The Trump administration has broadly pursued a strategy of fighting House oversight and impeachment subpoenas, resulting in a string of lower-court losses that have nevertheless succeeded in running down the clock. Senate Republicans have argued that any effort to enforce impeachment subpoenas could result in a long and drawn-out judicial battle as a reason for the moderate members of their caucus not to break ranks and join Democrats in voting to subpoena witnesses and documents.
Representative Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who is leading the House impeachment managers, has proposed that the Supreme Court Chief Justice, John G. Roberts Jr., who is presiding over the trial, could swiftly rule on the validity of any executive privilege claim. The trial has a perfectly good judge sitting behind me, Mr. Schiff said.
But Chief Justice Roberts does not embody and is not functioning as the Supreme Court. Several legal experts said that even if he were to rule that any invocation of the privilege is not valid, a subpoena recipient could ignore him and continue to defer to the president.
Then the Senate would likely still have to go through the normal court process to seek a judicial order to hear from the witness.
The administration could try, but it would face serious hurdles.
In theory, the Justice Department could file a lawsuit and ask a judge to issue a restraining order barring Mr. Bolton from testifying on the grounds that he might divulge information that is subject to executive privilege. But the government has never tried to do that.
Even if a judge agreed that the information the Senate would be seeking is covered by a valid claim of executive privilege, it is not clear that any judge or higher court would issue a restraining order. Under a constitutional doctrine called prior restraint, the First Amendment severely limits the ability of the government to gag speech before its expression.
A restraining order is unlikely because it would be unprecedented, a threat to First Amendment values, and in this context a threat to fundamental checks and balances, said Peter Shane, an Ohio State University professor and the co-author of a casebook on separation-of-powers law.
Its fuzzy. The scope and limits of the presidents power to keep internal executive branch information secret are ill-defined because in practice, administration officials and lawmakers have typically resolved executive privilege disputes through deals to accommodate investigators needs to avoid definitive judicial rulings.
In a 1974 Supreme Court case about whether President Richard M. Nixon had to turn over tapes of his Oval Office conversations to the Watergate prosecutor, the court ruled that executive privilege can be overcome if the information is needed for a criminal case. Nixon resigned 16 days later.
The Supreme Court in the Nixon case noted several times that the information sought did not involve presidential discussions about diplomatic or military matters, so the Justice Department might argue that the Watergate precedent does not cover Mr. Trumps internal communications about military aid to Ukraine.
Nevertheless, the courts would most likely use a balancing test, weighing the presidencys need for private internal deliberations against Congresss need for the specific information to investigate possible high-level wrongdoing, said Mark J. Rozell, a George Mason University professor who has written books about executive privilege.
Noting the Nixon-era precedent, he said he doubted that a claim of executive privilege would be upheld in the context of impeachment because the courts dont give all that much deference to claims of presidential secrecy in cases of alleged wrongdoing.
No.
In a related legal dispute, the Trump administration has argued that White House officials are absolutely immune from being compelled to respond to a subpoena when Congress is seeking information about their official duties.
If that were true, it would mean they did not even have to show up, separate and apart from whether they can lawfully decline to answer a particular question in deference to a presidents claim that the answer is covered by executive privilege.
Late last year, a Federal District Court judge rejected that theory in a case involving a congressional subpoena to Mr. Trumps former White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II. But Mr. McGahn does not want to cooperate and has permitted the Justice Department to file an appeal on his behalf, and the litigation is continuing.
Read the original:
Could Trump Muzzle John Bolton? The Limits of Executive Privilege, Explained - The New York Times
- College sued for stopping students from handing out Constitution [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Federal Judge Strikes Down New Yorks Super PAC Limits [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Argument preview: First Amendment protections for public employees subpoenaed testimony [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- U.S. Constitution - Amendment 1 - The U.S. Constitution ... [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- 1st Amendment - Laws [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- HOPE 9 - WikiLeaks, Whistleblowers, and the War on the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- GBS205 Legal Environment -THE FIRST AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- University Attacks First Amendment Costs $50,000 Plus - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- California Waste Plant Minions Suppress First Amendment Infowars Special Report - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Supreme Court Preview/Review #2 - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Liking on Facebook Protected Under First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- ConLaw Class 26 - The First Amendment Speech II - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Scalia Ginsburg debate NSA and first amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Political Correctness vs First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- BLM, Fed's Assault More Protesters As 'First Amendment Area' Taken Down - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Cannibal Cop: First Amendment Violated? - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- ConLaw Class 25 - The First Amendment -- Speech I - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- FIrst Amendment Under Attack - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- The First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- China toughens environment law to target polluters [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- [USA] First Amendment abused - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- Cliven Bundy and the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- First Amendment Tees Co. Inc. FAT-Tee Intro Video of who we are, and what we stand for - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- First Amendment Lawsuit After '8theist' Vanity Plate Denied, 'Baptist' Approved - Video [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2014]
- How A Public Corruption Scandal Became A Fight Over Free Speech [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- ALEX JONES.11/22/2013..First Amendment Showdown in Dealey Plaza - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI; Crystal Cox v. Obsidian Finance Group - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- MSNBC: Marjorie Dannenfelser Discusses SBA List First Amendment Case - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- United Church of Christ sues over North Carolina ban on same-sex marriage [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- Federal judge: Delayed access to court records raises First Amendment concerns [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- Justices Troubled By Their Earlier Ruling On Public Employee Speech Rights [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- Judge Won't Stop Jason Patric from Using Son's Name for Advocacy Purposes [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- PBL in Journalism I, 2014 - Video [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- Opinion: Sterling a victim, too [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Were Sterlings First Amendment Rights Violated? Nope. [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Obama Supporters Petition to Repeal the FIRST AMENDMENT Seriously! Watch!(Mark Dice) - Video [Last Updated On: April 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 30th, 2014]
- Senate Dems vow vote to change Constitution, block campaign funding [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- What happened to Sterling was morally wrong [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Former Supreme Court Justice Wants to Amend the Constitution [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Donald Sterling is my HERO - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Retaining Government Power to Make Economic Policy for Internet Access: Role of the First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- America was just defeated from within TODAY 4/29/2014 - Martial law is next - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- INFOWARS Nightly News: with Lee Ann McAdoo Friday April 11 2014: Alex Jones/Special Report - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Opposition To Proposed Monitoring Of Hate Speech By Federal Agency The Kelly File - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Westfield Mayor to pay $53K in campaign sign violation case - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Similarities Between The Two Clauses In The First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- ConLaw 1 Class 27 - The First Amendment - Free Exercise - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- PEASE: Free speech zones on Bundy Ranch violated First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- First Amendment common sense [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- Bar Owner Prevails in Buck Foston First Amendment Trial [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- Was Donald Sterling's First Amendment Right to Free Speech Violated? - Video [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- California Mayors Stand Behind Anti First Amendment Freedom of Speech Approval - Video [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- John Dukes on First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2014]
- The First Amendment Doesn't Allow us to Silence Opposition; Get Rid of Limits on Political Speech - Video [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Save Us Chuck - First Amendment Zones - Video [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- HAROLD PEASE: Free speech zones on Bundy Ranch violated First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- In our opinion: Why government can't tackle hate speech without shredding First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- In our opinion: Can't tackle hate speech without shredding First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Sen. Ed Markey proposes eliminating free speech - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Endangered Speeches - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Alabama Chief Justice Stunning Legal Ignorance - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- Church Uses First Amendment Protections To Perform Same Sex Marriages - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- first amendment test filming Tucson FBI Headquarters. - Video [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- "First Amendment ONLY for Christians," Says Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore - Video [Last Updated On: May 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 5th, 2014]
- First Amendment Monument Music Video by Daniel Brouse - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- first amendment rights - Video [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2014]
- News outlets say US drone ban breaches First Amendment [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Screw the First Amendment | We cant let people pray? - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Chief Justice: 1st Amendment Only Protects Christians - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- John Paul Stevens: "Money is not speech" - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- ALEX JONES Show Shocking Video: Cop Protects 1st AMENDMENT During TSA Opt Out Campaign - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Christopher Hitchens vs Tony Blair Debate - Religion A Force For Good In The World - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Feds Plan To Ban Ammunition - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- WHAT FIRST AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Letter: First Amendment rights trampled [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- A First Amendment attack on Assembly... in George Washington [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- Inside the Classroom with Professor Leslie Kendrick - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- 2014 Civics Video Awards First Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- .First Amendment protects political speech, not profanity - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- 2010 First Amendment Award: The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]