Harry and Meghans new charity wont fight inequality it will perpetuate it – The Independent

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have traded the contradictions of royalty for the contradictions of capitalism. Before they couldnt fail now they can.

Last week, Harry and Meghanrenamed their charity, Archewell. It replacesSussex Royal, the name the couple devised for themselves in January when they announced their intention to leave the royal family, and which the Queen demanded they stop using less than three months later. Indeed, a short history of the Sussexesself-branding reveals much about the contradictions of royal celebrity.

Harry and Meghan announced their departure in January with the launch of a heavily branded website. But the Sussex Royal brand represented an impossible attempt to have both freedom and royal status. The royal brand is enabling (hence Harry and Meghans desire to maintain association with it), while also being disabling (as shown by their need to exit); enabling as it catapulted Meghan to a new level of stardom, disabling as it created a public interest justification for scrutinising her every move, and prevented her from engaging in politics.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

There areparallel tensions in royal do-goodery: a huge proportion of royal duties are photo opportunities with charities, when in fact royalty depends upon the maintenance of an unequal status quo. Harry and Meghan will need to make huge sums of money if they are to cover their own security costs. This puts Archewell squarely in the conflicted space of philanthrocapitalism: a means of legitimising social inequality through good works.

Take Travalyst, Harrys eco-tourism venture with Skyscanner, TripAdvisor and Booking.com. Its environmentalist tactics include carbon offsetting, one on which Harry and Meghan have themselves relied in order to justify their use of private jets. Harrys attempt to make air travel guilt-free is at odds with the environmentalist movement they seek to support. But then, calling for the collapse of global air travel would hardly garner the support of the companies with social-responsibility budgets to spend.

In Archewell, Markle will be able to parlay her celebrity status. But at the same time, class politics will proscribe what kinds of work are acceptable for a royal-adjacent celebrity charitable enterprise.

While rags-to-riches stories have always been spun for royal brides, there is a public record of Markles past work,fromDeal or No DealandSuits to her lifestyle blog TheTig. The continued visibility of her historic hustle is anathema to a repressive class system in which those at the top are supposed to pretend it was always thus.

This is why the Sussex Royal brand has been a site of such a power struggle. When the Queen barred Harry and Meghan from using the word royal in their branding after their departure, Meghans American PR team responded by leaking to the Daily Mail that there was nothing legally stopping them from using the name, since Harry and Archie have royal blood and no one can take that away. In this rebrand to Archewell, apparently derived fromGreek word forsource of action, Harry and Meghan centre their privilege. At the very moment of claiming financial independence, the Sussexes are taking pains to distance themselves from the unroyal grubbiness of having to work for a living.

Hannah Yelin is a senior lecturer in Media and Culture at Oxford Brookes University

Go here to see the original:

Harry and Meghans new charity wont fight inequality it will perpetuate it - The Independent