The Second Circuit held in United States v. Allen, an appeal arising from the first U.S. prosecution in connection with the LIBOR manipulation scandal, that it violates a defendants Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to present an investigating grand or a trial jury with testimony that the defendant was compelled to give to foreign officials, regardless of whether the compelled testimony was presented directly or through another witness.
On July 19, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of two former London-based bankers, Anthony Allen and Anthony Conti, who were convicted in October 2015 on multiple counts of bank and wire fraud in connection with a scheme to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). See United States v. Allen, Crim. No. 16-939 (2d Cir. July 19, 2017). Witnesses for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) before both the grand and trial juries had been exposed to inculpatory testimony that the defendants were compelled to give against themselves by the UK government pursuant to UK law, and the Court of Appeals held that using that compelled testimony violated the defendants Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The Second Circuit further held that the DOJ failed to carry its heavy burden under the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in United States v. Kastigar, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), to show that the testimony introduced before the grand and trial juries did not derive from the defendants compelled testimony. Because the prosecution failed to carry its Kastigar burden, and using the compelled testimony was not harmless error, the Second Circuit reversed the convictions and dismissed the indictments.
Alleged LIBOR Manipulation
Allen and Conti worked at Coperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), a Dutch bank. During the 2000s, Rabobank was one of 16 banks that submitted its borrowing rates for U.S. dollars and Japanese yen on a daily basis to the British Bankers Association (BBA), the entity that calculated the LIBOR. The LIBOR is a series of daily benchmark rates at which banks can borrow funds in various currencies for various time periods. For each currency for which it calculated the LIBOR, the BBA accepted rates the banks submitted, discarded certain high and low submissions, and averaged the remaining submissions. Many financial transactions, including interest rate swaps, are tied to the LIBOR on a particular date, and those transactions are either profitable or not depending on the LIBOR in the relevant currency for the relevant time period on the relevant date, called the fixing date.
Allen and Conti each had, at various times and with varying frequency, responsibility for Rabobanks rate submissions to the BBA. Neither Rabobank nor the UK government had any policies concerning the submission of rates used to derive the LIBOR. Like a number of other banks that submitted their borrowing rates to the BBA, Rabobank was a party to a large number of LIBOR-tied transactions.
The prosecutions evidence at trial, which the Court of Appeals reviewed in detail, showed that the defendants received requests from Rabobank traders who had taken LIBOR-tied positions in transactions that would either make or lose money for the bank depending on the LIBOR. The Court of Appeals wrote, The Governments theory of the case was that these trader requests were dictated by the traders (and thus Rabobanks) interest in having LIBOR be higher or lower on particular dates based on the transactions that the trader had entered or positions they held.
The defendants conceded that it was inappropriate to base Rabobanks LIBOR submissions on rates that would benefit Rabobank, rather than on market-based evidence of the range of reasonable rates that fairly represented the rate at which Rabobank could borrow in dollars or yen for various intervals on that day. The defendants position at trial was that, although they received requests from traders for higher or lower submissions to the BBA, they did not honor those requests.
Financial Conduct Authoritys Investigation and Aborted Prosecution
The UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) worked in parallel with officials from the DOJ to investigate allegations of LIBOR manipulation and to interview individuals, including the defendants, in 2013. It was undisputed in the proceedings before the Court of Appeals that defendants Allen and Conti were compelled, on pain of imprisonment, to testify before the FCA. The FCA offered the defendants direct use immunity for their compelled testimony, but not derivative use immunity, according to the court. In other words, the FCA could not use the defendants statements against them at trial (i.e., no direct use), but could introduce evidence against them that it obtained based on their compelled statements (i.e., derivative use).
In contrast, when the DOJ seeks to compel a witness to testify over the witnesss invocation of his or her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the immunity order that is entered confers both direct and derivative use immunity. To avoid having the DOJs LIBOR investigation tainted by compelled testimony, the DOJ and the FCA interrogated witnesses on different days, with the DOJ interviewing first.
The FCA and the DOJ also investigated a Rabobank employee with rate submission responsibilities, Paul Robson, whom the FCA later charged with criminal conduct for his role in manipulating the LIBOR. As part of its pre-trial process in the UK, the FCA disclosed to Robson the compelled testimony that Allen and Conti had given. The Second Circuit stated that Robson closely reviewed that testimony, annotating it and taking several pages of notes. The FCA later abandoned its prosecution of Robson, and the DOJ picked up where the FCA left off.
In April 2014, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York indicted Robson and two other individuals but not Allen and Conti charging them with wire fraud, among other things. Robson proffered, signed a cooperation agreement, and pled guilty in summer 2014. Although Robson did not testify before the grand jury, information he provided to the DOJ was presented to the grand jury through an FBI agent. The grand jury subsequently indicted Allen and Conti, charging them with wire and bank fraud charges.
Allen and Conti waived extradition and filed a motion under Kastigar to suppress Robsons testimony at trial. The trial court deferred the Kastigar hearing until after trial. Robson testified at trial, and the jury convicted the defendants on all charges.
At the post-trial Kastigar hearing, Robson explained that he had been exposed to the defendants compelled testimony before the FCA. The trial court found, however, that Robsons statement that he had independent knowledge of the facts he presented at trial (and that had been presented to the grand jury through an FBI agent) was an independent source within the meaning of Kastigar.
Court of Appeals Holds Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Privilege Applies to Foreign-Compelled Testimony
The Court of Appeals held that the Fifth Amendments privilege against self-incrimination requires that a defendants statement to a foreign government official be voluntary before it can be admitted in a U.S. trial. The Second Circuit emphasized repeatedly that the self-incrimination privilege is a personal trial right that is absolute. As a result, in the courts opinion, the self-incrimination privilege applies to bar the admission in U.S. trials of a defendants compelled statements to a foreign government official even when, as in this case, the foreign government official acted pursuant to the foreign nations legal process in obtaining those statements. In short, if a sovereign power compelled the defendant to testify under the cruel trilemma of self-accusation, perjury or contempt, the statement cannot be used in a U.S. court to indict the defendant or obtain a conviction. The Court of Appeals was unwilling to countenance the DOJs position in the case, which would remove all impediment to introducing the defendants foreign compelled testimony, as in, the court wrote, Your honor, we offer Government Exhibit 1, the defendants compelled testimony.
The Second Circuit considered misplaced the U.S. governments concern that a foreign government might attempt to sabotage U.S. prosecutions by compelling and then broadcasting a defendants testimony to potential witnesses. The court quoted a speech by former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division Leslie Caldwell, who spoke of the DOJs efforts to coordinate with its counterparts abroad in investigating and prosecuting crime. The court noted that the DOJ was aware of its burden to avoid using compelled testimony as reflected by the interview scheduling system used in this case. The court also left open the possibility that there may be a different result if the foreign power appeared to be attempting to undermine a U.S. prosecution, noting that it would call into question whether the testimony obtained was really involuntary.
Having defined the defendants Fifth Amendment rights, the court concluded that the government violated their privilege against self-incrimination by introducing Robsons testimony at trial and to the grand jury through an FBI agent. Relying on Kastigar, the court explained that the privilege against self-incrimination applies not only to the testimony itself but to evidence derived from that testimony. The court noted that, when a defendant has been compelled to testify and is later prosecuted, the trial court will convene a hearing, a so-called Kastigar hearing, at which the prosecution must carry the heavy, albeit not insurmountable, burden that the evidence it will introduce was derived from legitimate independent sources. Typically, the prosecution meets this burden with canned testimony, that is, testimony the witness gave before he or she was tainted by exposure to the compelled testimony.
At the Kastigar hearing before the trial court in the Allen case, the exact opposite happened: Robson admitted that his testimony to the FCA was very different from the testimony he gave in the United States after reviewing the testimony of Allen and Conti. The Second Circuit held that the Kastigar hearing actually proved Robson had been tainted by the defendants compelled testimony to the FCA. The court concluded that the presentation of the tainted evidence to the grand and trial juries was not harmless, and it both vacated the conviction and dismissed the indictment against the defendants.
Implications
The Second Circuit explained that cross-border prosecutions are on the rise and observed that the DOJ is detailing its prosecutors to foreign investigators, including INTERPOL and the FCA. The court understood that, in the governments view, witness testimony is often the key to unraveling international financial crime. Although the court would not presume to know exactly what this brave new world of international criminal enforcement will entail, it was certain that these developments abroad need not affect the fairness of our trials at home.
Indeed, earlier this year, the DOJs Antitrust Division issued a Division Update, explaining that international cooperation on investigations of cartels was a top a priority and it was exploring bi-, tri- and multilateral agreements to foster greater international cooperation. Additionally, at a recent speech in Brazil, Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, Trevor N. McFadden stated that cooperation with our foreign partners has become a hallmark of our work and observed that reciprocity in information sharing is a vital tool in the modern prosecutors toolbox.
Indeed, recent settlements and investigations show that the DOJ is actively coordinating its efforts with the FCA and other foreign investigators. For example, earlier this year, State Street Corporation announced that it had reached a settlement with the DOJ concerning allegations it overcharged certain clients, an allegation first disclosed to the FCA in 2011. Also, in April, it was reported that the DOJ and the FCA are collaborating in an investigation into whether individuals at Barclays Bank engaged in civil or criminal misconduct in attempting to unmask a whistleblower. And the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York, the office that prosecuted Allen and Conti, announced late last year that it had charged several individuals with wire and securities fraud, identify theft and computer hacking following an investigation conducted in concert with Lahav 433, the cyber unit of the Israeli National Police, which, like the FCA, can legally compel witness testimony.
This international cooperation also is occurring among government regulators with civil remedies at their disposal. For example, when the SEC announced the filing of a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act complaint against executives at investment firm Och-Ziff Capital Management Group in January 2017, the SEC thanked the FCA and financial regulators in Guernsey, Jersey, Malta, Cyprus, Gibraltar and Switzerland for assisting in the investigation that led to the complaint.
Given the increase in cross-border investigations involving cooperation between U.S. and foreign law enforcement and regulatory authorities, practitioners representing defendants who have been interrogated abroad should investigate the possibility that compelled testimony was disseminated to witnesses the DOJ put before the grand jury or will call at trial. While the fact pattern in Allen is somewhat unique, there is a significant tactical advantage to identifying whether any witnesses were exposed to the compelled testimony and forcing the prosecution to carry its heavy burden under Kastigar of showing its evidence is untainted.
- Fifth Amendment - The Text, Origins, and Meaning of the ... [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- 5th Amendment - Revolutionary War and Beyond [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Fifth Amendment | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia ... [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ... [Last Updated On: April 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 26th, 2014]
- In NH, Ted Cruz talks Senate race, personal past, 2016 [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- Justices suggest public employees' testimony is protected [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2014] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2014]
- Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- HST 330 fifth amendment presentation - Video [Last Updated On: May 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 1st, 2014]
- Police not sure if Sioux City murder suspect invoked 5th Amendment rights [Last Updated On: May 3rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 3rd, 2014]
- Christie Ally Samson Refuses to Give Documents to Lawmakers [Last Updated On: May 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 4th, 2014]
- House votes contempt for ex-IRS official [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- House votes to hold ex-IRS official in contempt [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- House votes to hold ex-IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Ex-IRS official held in contempt [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- Judge: Bensalem officials didn't invoke the Fifth [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- House votes to hold Lois Lerner in contempt [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2014]
- House holds Lois Lerner in contempt [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- House votes to hold former IRS official in contempt [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Articles about Fifth Amendment - Los Angeles Times [Last Updated On: May 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 8th, 2014]
- Former PA Chairman Samson Pleads Fifth - Video [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2014]
- No plans to arrest Lois Lerner, John Boehner says [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2014]
- Im not going to testify: Witness pleads Fifth Amendment during Bangor triple murder trial [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2014]
- GOP-led House votes to hold former IRS official in contempt [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2014]
- Attorney: Defense told Corso will take Fifth [Last Updated On: May 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 16th, 2014]
- Christie: I knew nothing about plot - Video [Last Updated On: May 21st, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 21st, 2014]
- 2 county workers take 5th - Thu, 22 May 2014 PST [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2014]
- Shawn Vestal: County permit clerical mishap raises eyebrows - Fri, 23 May 2014 PST [Last Updated On: May 23rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 23rd, 2014]
- Spokane County workers use Fifth Amendment in back-dating case - Thu, 22 May 2014 PST [Last Updated On: May 23rd, 2014] [Originally Added On: May 23rd, 2014]
- Sexual abuse measure could lead to wrongful convictions, attorneys say [Last Updated On: September 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 1st, 2014]
- 5th Amendment - Laws.com [Last Updated On: September 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 1st, 2014]
- Wildstein takes the 5th - Video [Last Updated On: September 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 1st, 2014]
- Teen charged with killing his mother appears in court [Last Updated On: September 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 1st, 2014]
- New bill a powerful tool to imprison sex offenders [Last Updated On: September 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 2nd, 2014]
- Fifth Amendment (United States Constitution ... [Last Updated On: September 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 2nd, 2014]
- Cristin Milioti in The Good Wife - Julianna Margulies - Video [Last Updated On: September 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 4th, 2014]
- Kansas Supreme Court: Grand jury violated man's Fifth Amendment rights [Last Updated On: September 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 6th, 2014]
- GWB probe: Christie says he's not satisfied with unanswered questions [Last Updated On: September 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 9th, 2014]
- Texas man's conviction overturned because of Fifth Amendment violation [Last Updated On: September 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 9th, 2014]
- "Fifth Amendment" Defined & Explained - Law [Last Updated On: September 9th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 9th, 2014]
- Cop Says 'You Must Be Doing Something Wrong if You Invoke Your Rights' (Video) [Last Updated On: September 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 12th, 2014]
- Public be damned Litchfield latest example [Last Updated On: September 14th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 14th, 2014]
- Volokh Conspiracy: What the posse comitatus case might mean for the future of the exclusionary rule [Last Updated On: September 15th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 15th, 2014]
- Fifth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: September 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 16th, 2014]
- Top 5 Constitution-Related Searches at FindLaw.com [Last Updated On: September 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 18th, 2014]
- The Fifth Amendment Eminent Domain - Video [Last Updated On: September 18th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 18th, 2014]
- Apple And Google Will Force A Legal Battle Over The Privacy Of Your Passcode [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- Civics- The Fifth Amendment (Sarah Hutchinson) - Video [Last Updated On: September 20th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 20th, 2014]
- GOP fumes over Lerner remarks [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2014]
- Google and Apple Wont Unlock Your Phone, But a Court Can Make You Do It [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2014]
- Assistant to DeKalb CEO Ellis invokes 5th Amendment 30 times [Last Updated On: September 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 22nd, 2014]
- GOP fumes as Lois Lerner talks to press but snubs Congress [Last Updated On: September 24th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 24th, 2014]
- Cry us a river, Lois Lerner [Last Updated On: September 24th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 24th, 2014]
- Can You Go to Jail for Refusing to Testify? [Last Updated On: September 25th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 25th, 2014]
- Fifth Amendment Projectb - Video [Last Updated On: September 25th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 25th, 2014]
- The Commander Cody Band - Take The Fifth Amendment - 8/5/1977 - Convention Hall (Official) - Video [Last Updated On: September 27th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 27th, 2014]
- Joey Gallo Takes The Fifth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: September 30th, 2014] [Originally Added On: September 30th, 2014]
- Batavia High School teacher John Dryden retires [Last Updated On: October 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 4th, 2014]
- Batavia High School teacher John Dryden retires from school district [Last Updated On: October 4th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 4th, 2014]
- The Fifth Amendment Please Don't Leave Me Now - Video [Last Updated On: October 5th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 5th, 2014]
- Man Denied Fifth Amendment While In Court Wearing Anti-Police Shirt, Still Won His Case (Video) [Last Updated On: October 6th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 6th, 2014]
- Batavia teacher previously involved in Fifth Amendment dispute retires [Last Updated On: October 7th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 7th, 2014]
- INFORMUCATE: THE FIFTH AMENDMENT - Video [Last Updated On: October 8th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 8th, 2014]
- Fairholme Funds Appeals Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Verdict [Last Updated On: October 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 11th, 2014]
- Fresno Police Officer violated fifth amendment at a dui checkpoint. part 2 - Video [Last Updated On: October 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 11th, 2014]
- Fresno Police Officer violated fifth amendment at a dui checkpoint. - Video [Last Updated On: October 11th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 11th, 2014]
- Code cases: Police want phone access, but some pass [Last Updated On: October 12th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 12th, 2014]
- All About - Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Video [Last Updated On: October 16th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 16th, 2014]
- Property Rights | Century Law Group - Video [Last Updated On: October 21st, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 21st, 2014]
- Scott and Crist have heated and personal final debate before November election [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2014]
- Agents questioned, Askar takes the Fifth in Trombetta hearing [Last Updated On: October 22nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 22nd, 2014]
- Detective dodges questions about allegations made during rape investigation [Last Updated On: October 25th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 25th, 2014]
- Disciplinary hearing for SB officer moved to later date - Video [Last Updated On: October 26th, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 26th, 2014]
- Court rules: Touch ID is not protected by the Fifth Amendment but Passcodes are [Last Updated On: October 31st, 2014] [Originally Added On: October 31st, 2014]
- Virginia Court: LEOs Can Force You To Provide Fingerprint To Unlock Your Phone [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2014]
- Virginia judge: Police can demand a suspect unlock a phone with a fingerprint [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2014]
- Judge Rules Suspect Can Be Required To Unlock Phone With Fingerprint [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2014]
- Your Fingerprints Belong To Us: Iphone Users Forfeit 5th Amendment 1 - Video [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2014]
- Civil Rights and Civil Liberties - Fifth Amendment - Shh! The Right to Remain Silent - Video [Last Updated On: November 1st, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 1st, 2014]
- All Your Fingerprints Are Belong To Us: iPhone Users Forfeit Fifth Amendment - Video [Last Updated On: November 2nd, 2014] [Originally Added On: November 2nd, 2014]