Is Prison Necessary? Ruth Wilson Gilmore Might Change Your …

But in the United States, its difficult for people to talk about prison without assuming there is a population that must stay there. When people are looking for the relative innocence line, Gilmore told me, in order to show how sad it is that the relatively innocent are being subjected to the forces of state-organized violence as though they were criminals, they are missing something that they could see. It isnt that hard. They could be asking whether people who have been criminalized should be subjected to the forces of organized violence. They could ask if we need organized violence.

Another widely held misconception Gilmore points to is that prison is majority black. Not only is it a false and harmful stereotype to overassociate black people with prison, she argues, but by not acknowledging racial demographics and how they shift from one state to another, and over time, the scope and crisis of mass incarceration cant be fully comprehended. In terms of racial demographics, black people are the population most affected by mass incarceration roughly 33 percent of those in prison are black, while only 12 percent of the United States population is but Latinos still make up 23 percent of the prison population and white people 30 percent, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. (Gilmore has heard people argue that drug laws will change because the opioid epidemic hurts rural whites, a myth that drives her crazy. People say, God knows theyre not going to lock up white people, she told me, and its like, Yes, they do lock up white people.) Once you believe prisons are predominately black, its also easier to believe that prisons are a conspiracy to re-enslave black people a narrative, Gilmore acknowledges, that offers two crucial truths: that the struggles and suffering of black people are central to the story of mass incarceration, and that prison, like slavery, is a human rights catastrophe. But prison as a modern version of Jim Crow mostly serves to allow people to worry about a population they might otherwise ignore. The guilty are worthy of being ignored, and yet mass incarceration is so phenomenal that people are trying to find a way to care about those who are guilty of crimes. So, in order to care about them, they have to have some category to which they become worthy of worry. And the category is slavery.

A person who eventually either steals something or assaults someone goes to prison, where he is offered no job training, no redress of his own traumas and issues, no rehabilitation. The reality of prison, and of black suffering, is just as harrowing as the myth of slave labor, Gilmore says. Why do we need that misconception to see the horror of it? Slaves were compelled to work in order to make profits for plantation owners. The business of slavery was cotton, sugar and rice. Prison, Gilmore notes, is a government institution. It is not a business and does not function on a profit motive. This may seem technical, but the technical distinction matters, because you cant resist prisons by arguing against slavery if prisons dont engage in slavery. The activist and researcher James Kilgore, himself formerly incarcerated, has said, The overwhelming problem for people inside prison is not that their labor is super exploited; its that theyre being warehoused with very little to do and not being given any kind of programs or resources that enable them to succeed once they do get out of prison.

The National Employment Law Project estimates that about 70 million people have a record of arrest or conviction, which often makes employment difficult. Many end up in the informal economy, which has been absorbing a huge share of labor over the last 20 years. Gardener, home health care, sweatshops, you name it, Gilmore told me. These people have a place in the economy, but they have no control over that place. She continued: The key point here, about half of the work force, is to think not only about the enormity of the problem, but the enormity of the possibilities! That so many people could benefit from being organized into solid formations, could make certain kinds of demands, on the people who pay their wages, on the communities where they live. On the schools their children go to. This is part of what abolitionist thinking should lead us to.

Abolition, as a word, is an intentional echo of the movement to abolish slavery. This work will take generations, and Im not going to be alive to see the changes, the activist Mariame Kaba told me. Similarly I know that our ancestors, who were slaves, could not have imagined my life. And as Kaba and Davis and Richie and Gilmore all told me, unsolicited and in almost identical phrasing, it is not serendipity that the movement of prison abolition is being led by black women. Davis and Richie each used the term abolition feminism. Historically, black feminists have had visions to change the structure of society in ways that would benefit not just black women but everyone, Davis said. She also talked about Du Bois and the lessons drawn from his conception of what was needed: not merely a lack of slavery but a new society, utterly transformed. I think the fact that so many people now do call themselves prison abolitionists, Michelle Alexander told me, is a testament to the fact that an enormous amount of work has been done, in academic circles and in grass-root circles. Still, if you just say prison abolition on CNN, youre going to have a lot of people shaking their heads. But Ruthie has always been very clear that prison abolition is not just about closing prisons. Its a theory of change.

When Gilmore encounters an audience that is hostile to prison abolition, an audience that supposes shes navely suggesting that those in prison are there for smoking weed, and wants to tell her whos really locked up, what terrible things theyve done, she tells them shes had a loved one murdered and isnt there to talk about people who smoke weed. But as she acknowledged to me, Part of the whole story that cant be denied is that people are tired of harm, they are tired of grief and they are tired of anxiety. She described to me conversations shed had with people who are glad their abusive husband or father has been removed from their home, and would not want it any other way. Of her own encounter with murder, shes more philosophical, even if the loss still seems raw.

I had this heart-to-heart with my aunt, the mother of my murdered cousin, John. On the surface, we were talking about something else, but we were really talking about him. I said, Forgive and forget. And she replied, Forgive, but never forget. She was right: The conditions under which the atrocity occurred must change, so that they cant occur again.

For Gilmore, to never forget means you dont solve a problem with state violence or with personal violence. Instead, you change the conditions under which violence prevailed. Among liberals, a kind of quasi-Christian idea about empathy circulates, the idea that we have to find a way to care about the people whove done bad. To Gilmore this is unconvincing. When she encountered the kids in Fresno who hassled her about prison abolition, she did not ask them to empathize with the people who might hurt them, or had. She instead asked them why, as individuals, and as a society, we believe that the way to solve a problem is by killing it. She was asking if punishment is logical, and if it works. She let the kids find their own way to answer.

Continued here:

Is Prison Necessary? Ruth Wilson Gilmore Might Change Your ...