Death of Doing Business Report greatly exaggerated as World Bank announces rebranding plans – CADTM.org

Summary

It consists of several closely associated institutions, among which :

1. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD, 189 members in 2017), which provides loans in productive sectors such as farming or energy ;

2. The International Development Association (IDA, 159 members in 1997), which provides less advanced countries with long-term loans (35-40 years) at very low interest (1%) ;

3. The International Finance Corporation (IFC), which provides both loan and equity finance for business ventures in developing countries.

As Third World Debt gets worse, the World Bank (along with the IMF) tends to adopt a macro-economic perspective. For instance, it enforces adjustment policies that are intended to balance heavily indebted countries payments. The World Bank advises those countries that have to undergo the IMFs therapy on such matters as how to reduce budget deficits, round up savings, enduce foreign investors to settle within their borders, or free prices and exchange rates.

These findings gave rise to intense discussions among World Bank and IMFIMFInternational Monetary FundAlong with the World Bank, the IMF was founded on the day the Bretton Woods Agreements were signed. Its first mission was to support the new system of standard exchange rates.

When the Bretton Wood fixed rates system came to an end in 1971, the main function of the IMF became that of being both policeman and fireman for global capital: it acts as policeman when it enforces its Structural Adjustment Policies and as fireman when it steps in to help out governments in risk of defaulting on debt repayments.

As for the World Bank, a weighted voting system operates: depending on the amount paid as contribution by each member state. 85% of the votes is required to modify the IMF Charter (which means that the USA with 17,68%% of the votes has a de facto veto on any change).

The institution is dominated by five countries: the United States (16,74%), Japan (6,23%), Germany (5,81%), France (4,29%) and the UK (4,29%). The other 183 member countries are divided into groups led by one country. The most important one (6,57% of the votes) is led by Belgium. The least important group of countries (1,55% of the votes) is led by Gabon and brings together African countries.

http://imf.org shareholders and within the media. It also brought to the fore the degree to which the Bank and Fund are impacted by deepening tensions between the US and the Global North more generally and China. After a period of ardent speculation about the implications of the investigation for the legitimacy of the Bank and Fund, and the fate of Georgievas tenure, the IMF executive board issued a statement affirming its support of the managing director on 11 October.

Much media coverage focused on the personal responsibility of former Bank President Kim and Georgieva, and the allegedly strained relations between Georgieva and current Bank President, David Malpass. Some presented the episode as evidence of Chinese efforts to expand its influence within international organisations. Disappointingly, very few media outlets in the Global North while lamenting or warning of the inherent dangers of increased Chinese weight at the World Bank took time to reference the work of Eric Toussaint of the Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt, and other academics, who have critically documented historical US hegemony within the multilateral system.

Recognising that the DBR scandal was just the tip of the iceberg and arguing for a comprehensive response, a 12 October open letter signed by 143 civil society organisations and individuals, called for the Bank to urgently address the structural issues revealed by the DBR scandal. The letter demanded reform of both institutions governance structures, including the gentlemans agreement. It called for steps to address the internal accountability deficit and widespread perceived conflict of interestInterestAn amount paid in remuneration of an investment or received by a lender. Interest is calculated on the amount of the capital invested or borrowed, the duration of the operation and the rate that has been set. in policy lending and technical assistance, the ideological bias in policy advice and conditionality, and the unwillingness of the World Bank to engage meaningfully with the international human rights framework.

Hopes that the World Bank and IMF would use the DBR scandal as an opportunity to address the structural shortcomings outlined in the CSO letter were short-lived. On 10 November Reuters reported that, the World Bank plans to unveil in about two years a replacement for its flagship Doing Business report. The development of the new DBR will be informed by the results of an external panel review of the report commissioned by the World Banks Chief Economist Carmen Reinhart, and released on 20 September. The panel made several recommendations that relate to long-standing civil society criticisms of the DBR, including adopting indicators that measure the positive functions of government in promoting a good business environment; removing the country rankings; ending the potential conflict of interest created by selling consulting services to governments aimed at improving their countrys score; establishing a firewall between the DBR unit and other Bank operations; and creating a permanent external review board.

According to Reuters, Reinhart noted that, key concepts for the new product [include] a mandate for more transparency about the underlying methodology and less focus on ranking countries. Reinhart emphasised that the Bank had instituted a lot of safeguards over the past year, noting that, the underlying nuts and bolts will be in the public domain. She hoped that credibility will follow. Regarding credibility, a 26 October Al Jazeera article noted that a second WilmerHale report investigating potential wrongdoing by current and former bank staff, including Georgieva, will be released in about two months to the Banks human resources department and not its board.

The announcement of DBRs rehabilitation confirmed the fears of economic justice groups and labour unions, many of whom had anticipated that the report would be refashioned without engaging with the structural concerns raised by civil society. Despite the expert panels sensible recommendations, the Bank has failed to address critical questions about its undemocratic governance or the DBRs private sector-led development bias.

The Banks unwillingness to critically engage with the reports premise that what is beneficial for business is good for development, or to assess the negative impact of DBR-driven reforms, has long been critised (see Observer Winter 2019). Unsurprisingly, the DBR cancellation announcement stressed, the World Bank Group remains firmly committed to advancing the role of the private sector in development and providing support to governments to design the regulatory environment that supports this.

Further evidence of the Banks direction was seen in Malpasss comments during the 2021 Annual Meetings Town Hall with civil society, where he stressed that the Bank would continue to analyse and advise on country-level business reforms through its Systematic Country Diagnostic. Likewise, the Banks 2021 Development Policy Financing (DPF) retrospective notes, By fostering an environment more conducive to private sector development, DPFs play an essential role in mobilizing private capital and supporting private sector led growth in client countries, especially critical in a context of tight fiscal space.

Civil society, labour unions and social movements fear that the focus on tightening fiscal space and related allusions to the expected austerity wave (see Observer Winter 2021), will lead to a further push for the privatisation of social services and development more generally even as the global impacts of the pandemic persist. Continued IMF-mandated austerity was strongly opposed by over 500 organisations and individuals who signed an open letter to Georgieva in advance of the 2020 Annual Meetings (see Dispatch Annuals 2020).

The Banks planned revival of the DBR is consistent with a wider trend: Rather than critically engaging with fundamental structural criticisms about its market-solutions approach, it is merely redeploying it under a more financialised incarnation (see Observer Spring 2020). This was also the case with the Banks cascade approach (see Observer Summer 2017), since renamed Maximizing Finance for Development (see Observer Spring 2020), and now integrated into the institutions Green, Resilient and Inclusive Development (GRID) approach (see Dispatch Annuals 2021).

The DBR and other World Bank-devised frameworks can be linked to a phenomenon identified by Brazilian political economist Lena Lavinas as the collaterateralisation of social policy. She observed that credit and debt, along with new financial devices, are becoming the cornerstones of what used to be social protection systems. These erode state capacity, relegating its function to a what Bristol-based economist Daniela Gabor calls the de-risking state (see Observer Winter 2017-2018). According to Ohio State Universitys Professor Linda Labaos 2018 article, the shrinking of the state has resulted in the restructuring of the social contract between governments, citizens and the private sector, which has, led to shifts in state capacity and policy orientation that leave populations bereft of needed public services, increased inequality across geographic areas and sociodemographic groups, and political effects such as the growth of right-wing populism.

University of Johannesburg sociologist Patrick BondBondA bond is a stake in a debt issued by a company or governmental body. The holder of the bond, the creditor, is entitled to interest and reimbursement of the principal. If the company is listed, the holder can also sell the bond on a stock-exchange. remarks, Whats ultimately most important is that again and again, the Bank not only sets the stage for neoliberal coddling of corporations at policy level, in Doing Business. Just as important is the actual practice of the Bank and International Finance Corporation when doing biz here in South Africa that includes catastrophic investments such as the Banks biggest-ever loan: $3.75 billion for the bribery-riddled Medupi coal-fired power plant, as well as the Marikana platinum mine and Net1. These have amounted to unpunished victim-filled crimes, egged on by a mentality fostered by Doing Business: deregulatory, profitProfitThe positive gain yielded from a companys activity. Net profit is profit after tax. Distributable profit is the part of the net profit which can be distributed to the shareholders.-centric, high-carbon, extractivist and eco-catastrophic, Ponzi-scheming and profoundly anti-poor (see Observer Spring 2019).

The over 360 organisations, trade unions and individuals who signed a March open letter calling on the Bank to discontinue the DBR (see Observer Autumn 2020, Winter 2019; Update Autumn 2013) must redouble efforts during the next two years to drive the Bank to address the iceberg concealed by the DBR scandal. As Frederic Mousseau of US-based Oakland Institute stressed, reflecting on the 2014 joint statement from 280 organisations of the Our Land Our Business Campaign, global civil society is determined to make the Bank keep the DBR in its grave, where it can no longer do harm.

The rest is here:

Death of Doing Business Report greatly exaggerated as World Bank announces rebranding plans - CADTM.org