Tips and Murmurs: is the Collaery case about to open up? – Crikey

A decision on the lockdown of Bernard Collaery's trial may be imminent, and The Australian does what it does best when someone powerful is accused of sexual harassment...

Is a decision looming over whether Bernard Collaerys trial will be held in open court? Plus The Australian continues to run interference for Dyson Heydon, and Quillette will defend your right to free speech to the death (unless it offends them). Plus other tips and murmurs from theCrikeybunker.

Welcome to the police state It seems that soon, we will know how much will be made public about one of Australias great hidden crimes. Since late May the pre-trial hearing for lawyer Bernard Collaery (who advised intelligence whistleblower Witness K) has been running behind doors not so much closed as bolted shut.

Several high profile figures including former foreign minister Gareth Evans, retired admiral Chris Barrie and former Timor-Leste leader Xanana Gusmao have provided arguments that the trial should be in open court.

We hear that the judges decision on whether Attorney-General Christian Porters certificate asserting that certain evidence will prejudice national security if heard in public will be delivered at 2:15 pm this Friday, June 26.

News Corp watch Since the Dyson Heydon scandal broke, The Australian has been doing what any quality paper would do muddying the waters in defence of a powerful man credibly accused of sexual harassment by several women over the course of several years.

First questioning whether the former judge had received procedural fairness, today the paper reports that the inquirys findings were reached without hearing one word from Heydon. But theres some equivocation going on there as yesterdays piece noted, Heydon was permitted to inspect written allegations and was allowed to provide a response that was considered by the investigator before a decision was reached.

Indeed, according to one of the reporters who spent years chasing this story Jacqueline Maley, Heydon simply declined to be interviewed or provide a statement.

That was then, this is now Nine has given another platform for Liberal backbenchers to attack superannuation, this time demanding a freeze on compulsory contributions as part of a broader agenda to halt the growth of industry (or union-backed) super funds. But opposition isnt universal many feel that the current 9.5% contribution is actually insufficient:

The contribution rate is not yet high enough to provide fully-funded retirement incomes [it] is lagging behind the 15% required over a working lifetime to get the majority of Australians to a privately funded retirement.

Who said that? Why, one Andrew Bragg in a 2015 op-ed written when he worked for the Financial Services Council.

As for the argument that super should be used to fund housing, now-Senator Bragg had this to say: superannuation is not for housing, estate planning or a honey pot for governments with short term fiscal problems. Hes very much changed his tune since, but we wonder if that will be mentioned next time Nine amplifies a Liberal Party attack on super?

Freedom Fighters You can set your watch to it. Yesterday columnist Sean Kelly briefly observed that Quillette has been happy to publish authors known for promoting theories of white supremacy. (He hasnt been the only one to make such an observation.)

Quillette founder Claire Lehmann, doing her bit for free speech and broadening the Overton Window, responded with a loaded reference to Australias complainant- friendly defamation laws.

This is going to be fun she tweeted, presumably referring to the ability of people with money to shut down debate in Australia using the court system. And while wed never dare quibble with the leader of the sigh intellectual dark web, were not sure what her being born in Australia has to do with defamation law.

Elsewhere, did whoever penned this Oz editorial (the war on humour is not a joke) have a word with Chris Kenny?

Have you got a tip forCrikey?Let us know.

Save up to 50% on a year of Crikey, or, dig deeper so that we can dig deeper.

Crikey may be small but our goal has always been to focus on the why, not the what of public life to explain how power is used and abused in Australia, and the systems and people who facilitate it.

But to do that effectively, we need subscribers. Lots of them.

Join Crikey now, and for the first time ever, choose what you pay.

Peter FrayEditor-In-Chief of Crikey

See the article here:

Tips and Murmurs: is the Collaery case about to open up? - Crikey