While theres widespread agreement that we need an immediate, massive stimulus and targeted economic supports to deal with the economic collapse caused by the coronavirus, theyre clearly not enough. We also urgently need to think long-termboth about the all-too-predictable things that got us into this crisis, and how we can refashion our economy and society as we eventually emerge.
Guiding our own thinking is a basic public-health principle that should have long been our standard for all economic and social policy: We protect ourselves when we protect others. We are being asked right now to limit contact, to work remotely, and to do this mostly to shield those who are most vulnerable. We are being asked to dig deep into government coffers and bear the future burden of debt so that we can bring quick relief for those often left at the margins. And we are asking businesses to step up (or forcing them to step up) to their responsibilities and adjust schedules, offer paid sick leave, and understand family demands.
But why is this good for a crisis and not for daily life? While we should stand together by staying physically apart in this time of pandemic, we need to give up the sort of social distance that has allowed so many to ignore homelessness, immigration uncertainty, and rural poverty. We need to come out of this troubling moment with a deeper commitment to each other. We need to realize that an ethos of mutual caring and support not only leads to better health outcomes, but also helps to generate a more vibrant and resilient society.
We need a new solidarity economics.
Our lack of social solidarity has been a key contributor to our vulnerability to the coronavirus outbreak.
Unprecedented levels of inequality have left large numbers of Americans unprepared for an emergency, with nearly half of the U.S. population unable to handle just a $400 emergency expense. That inequality has also distorted our health care system, where we can provide world-class end-of-life care to the wealthy, but have underinvested in the basic infrastructure of our public-health system, leaving us dangerously unprepared for massive testing and waves of hospitalization.
Partly driving that inequality and partly resulting from it has been a low level of inclusion. Long before we were told to practice physical distance, we were already practicing an acute form of social distance: Increasingly, we have been sorted by income, race, and politics. It has become easy for some groups to ignore homelessness or incarceration or economic despair, seeing those as issues facing others. And that hurts all of usfor example, research shows that when there is a rise in the racial generation gap (the difference between the racial composition of the old and the young), public investment in education falls. That damages the economy as a whole.
Exacerbating the gaps between groups has been a problem with information. The lack of accountability of our social media systems, driven by the drive for super profits in winner-take-all markets, has contributed to the proliferation of misinformation and conflicting advice. Fake news crosses the ideological spectrumno, Donald Trump does not actually own stock in a company the Centers for Disease Control uses for COVID-19 tests, nor did U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hold back coronavirus funding to run negative ads about Republicans, both popularly shared stories. But profiteering from political and social polarizationthe basic business model of Fox Newshas been allowed to take deep root.
Not entirely new but certainly pushed along by the factors above has been a miserly commitment to social insurance. We have looked the other way as businesses expanded gig jobs with few if any benefits. We have settled for a limited social safety net that seems more aimed at saving dollars than saving lives. As a result, we have 28 million people without health insurance, and 44 million more with inadequate health insurance that imposes high deductibles and co-pays, preventing people from getting the treatment they need. With no mandated policies for paid sick leave, millions of people continue to have to work while ill, disproportionately including many workers in our restaurants and grocery stores, which contributes to the rapid spread of the coronavirus.
And while it may seem odd to say about an economy that has spawned Google, Facebook, and Amazon, we have a serious problem with innovation. We spend billions on speeding up the delivery of consumer goods but have failed to mount the infrastructure needed to solve the problem of homelessness. We are developing medicine to treat diseases of the wealthy, but neglect research on infectious diseases that kill millions in poor countries of the global South. We are forging ahead with the development of high-end electric vehicles even as we continue to allow environmental hazards to wreak havoc on the health of marginalized communities.
In short, just as Hurricane Katrina revealed the underlying inequities and vulnerabilities baked into the economic, social, and physical landscape of New Orleans, the COVID-19 crisis is shining a light on deeply rooted problems in America. Moving forward will require not just emergency actions but attention to and alignment with efforts to fundamentally restructure how we build and sustain our economy.
We offered the starting frame for solidarity economics in our 2018 publication From Resistance to Renewal: A 12-Step Program for Innovation and Inclusion in the California Economy. There we pointed to a range of policy solutions that seem almost prescient today: Among them were universal basic income funded by a technology dividend, increased investment in basic science, expansion and improvement of the caring economy, full immigrant integration to bring people out of the shadows, rapid de-incarceration and re-entry of the formerly incarcerated, universal health insurance and portable benefits, social-housing programs to ensure long-term affordability, industry-wide wage boards to coordinate labor and business, and realigned tax systems that were both more progressive and more stable.
Just as important as the policy package were our philosophical starting points. We had three central pillars to our thinking.
The first was that the standard economic models of human behavior were outdated. The general assumption by most economists has been that people act purely (or at least largely) out of self-interest. For conservatives, the good news is that the market will coordinate all that selfishness to a blissful outcome, and so limited government is the best recipe. (Hows that working for you today?) On the left, there has been a corresponding take, in reaction to the dominance of laissez-faire. It has featured a strong belief that the state must act to constrain the worst instances of bad behavior and corral the economy into serving the common good.
But as has become evident in this and other crises, people also act out of impulses of solidarity with one another. The challenge is that we have structured our economic and political systems to either reward or tame self-interest rather than to promote our connection with one another. We will obviously need enforcement for people to stay home, but the differences in containment by countries in this crisisChina and South Korea versus Italy and the U.S.have resulted not just from such factors as the strength of government and the social safety net, but also from the balance that different societies strike between communitarian and individualistic values.
The second pillar of our thinking actually flows from the first: The old canard that inequality is perhaps politically unpopular but economically necessary is just thata canard. In fact, a wide range of research studiesincluding from such unexpected sources such as the Cleveland Federal Reserve and the International Monetary Fundhave shown that high levels of income disparities, racial segregation, and social fragmentation actually tend to limit the sustainability of growth in income and jobs. It turns out that mutuality matters.
We have, of course, been practicing just the opposite. Weve had a dog-eat-dog economic system in which short-term thinking dominates and venture capital is too often vulture capital. When societies and regions invest in all their members, by contrast, basic productivity rises. When there are trusting relations between economic and social actors, consensus on how to grow the economy increases. When businesses treat their employees, customers, and suppliers with dignity and respect, profits are stable and consistent. And as we now know from the principle of public health, when we protect the most vulnerable, we protect everyone.
The third pillar of our thinking was that the purpose of our economy is not just to generate GDP. Prosperity mattersbut so do security and community. Indeed, that was the secret of getting out of the Great Depression: Keynesian demand management to drive growth; the extension of a sense and the reality of security through, well, Social Security, unemployment insurance, and, eventually, the adoption of employer-based benefits like health insurance; and the reconnection of disparate parts of the nation through investments like the Tennessee Valley Authority.
We need that sort of triadprosperity, security, and communityin what will amount to this generations version of economic catastrophe and New Deal response. That response needs to be altered to fit our times. Growth can no longer come at the cost of the environment. The safety netas is evident from this crisisneeds to be universal and not employer-based, especially given the changing nature of work. And while the New Deal excluded African Americans and other people of color from a range of protections, partly to secure the support of Southern Democrats, this time we must ensure that community means all of us.
We are facing an immediate need to think long-term. In the same way that we need to flatten the contagion curve by spreading out the impact of the coronavirus, we also need to flatten the economic curve, linking short-term interventions with longer-term programs that provide security for families and community, strengthen connections between people and places, and grow employment and the economy.
To do this, policy needs to be brought together under another three-part frame: Lift the bottom, grow the middle, and tame the top.
For lifting the bottom, we need to provide immediate assistance to the most vulnerable among us, while using those interventions to build support for longer-term solutions. In the field of health, for example, we need now to provide a guarantee that everyone, regardless of income, availability of insurance, or immigration status, will be fully covered for the costs of testing and treatment for COVID-19, while using this to build the case for universal health insurance. We need targeted interventions for those most vulnerablepeople with disabilities, seniors, those with chronic illness, the poor, the homeless, and those incarceratedto build back the social safety net ravaged by Democrats and Republicans alike. Moreover, we should devise programs that include the undocumented and stress the public-health risks that have resulted from a broken immigration system that forces so many families away from needed services and into the shadows.
We should also now be providing paid sick days for everyone, including home health care providers, food-chain workers, and delivery drivers, who are providing essential services in our crisis, and are also highly vulnerable to being infected and further spreading the virus. But we should just as urgently stress that paid sick days and paid family leave be made permanent. Cash payments now are critical for people in need, as leaders across the political spectrum apparently realize. But rather than one- or two-time payments, we can and should guarantee a minimum basic income to all in need through the end of the economic crisis. That, in turn, can help us better understand the long-term benefits of some form of universal-income guarantee. Housing for the homeless, eviction moratoriums, and rent freezes are also needed now and can become the basis longer-term for much-needed rent stabilization and social-housing policies.
We need to think, too, about all parts of the working classfor example, those who work in what we call the caring economy. The coronavirus has made clear that those caregivers taking care of the most vulnerable are some of the most vulnerable themselves. What if we recognized and invested in them, providing training and better access to telemedical care and advice, and raising professional standards and wages. Wed improve our health care provision, reduce our vulnerability to future disease outbreaks (including simply the seasonal flu), and grow middle-wage jobs.
Or what if we devoted serious attention to the potentials of remote education and lifelong learning? The coronavirus crisis has made clear how not to develop remote-education opportunities, throwing teachers and professors immediately into having to run classes online with few resources, training, or curriculum support. But if done properly, remote education can play a critical role in making lifelong learning accessible to working people. As a percentage of GDP, we spend the lowest on adult workforce education out of all but two OECD countriesMexico and Chile. Most European countries spend two to five times as much as we do; Denmark spends nearly ten times as much. Investing resources here could both help our immediate education crisis and expand our middle class long-term.
Finally, we also need to tame the top. In the short term, that means ensuring that any public benefits to major corporations are conditioned on their maintaining employment levels; these should be in the form of loans, not grants, and should eliminate buybacks as an option for any company receiving assistance. A repeat of the financial crisis bailout is neither viable not desirable. Any stimulus legislation needs to prioritize employees, not profitsnot just now but in the long run.
Taming the top also means ensuring that the American public actually benefits from our nearly $700 million collective investment in coronavirus research that constitutes the basic science for developing a vaccineand that the results of such research be guided by policies of global solidarity and public health, rather than narrow nationalism and profiteering, which are already beginning to raise their ugly heads. In the longer term, it means restoring reasonable tax rates for our top-income earners, which were at 70 percent at the height of American prosperity in the 1950s and have now dropped so low that the top 400 income earners pay a lower tax rate than anyone else.
Ultimately, what a solidarity economics framework reminds us is that caring for others is not just the morally right thing to do. It both reflects our better angels and provides better outcomes for society at large. Whats true in a crisis is also true in the long haul: A deep commitment to mutuality and the common good is the right thing to do for both public and economic health.
View post:
Solidarity Economicsfor the Coronavirus Crisis and Beyond - The American Prospect
- The Libertarian Case for a Basic Income | Libertarianism.org [Last Updated On: March 26th, 2016] [Originally Added On: March 26th, 2016]
- The U.S. Basic Income Guarantee Network [Last Updated On: June 12th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 12th, 2016]
- Basic Income Guarantee - Your Right to Economic Security ... [Last Updated On: November 10th, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 10th, 2016]
- Basic Income Guarantee Conference 2016 October 5 and 6 ... [Last Updated On: November 14th, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 14th, 2016]
- Income inequality in the United States - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: January 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: January 10th, 2017]
- Basic Income as All-inclusive Democratic Subsidy - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- A response to 'The dangers of a basic income' - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- Basic income is superior to the job guarantee - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- CANADA: Over 10000 people have signed to support Basic Income - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- OPINION: Human rights, basic needs - The Guardian [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- Left-Wing America Steps Up Calls For Free Money, Jobs Guarantee - Daily Caller [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- Guaranteed basic income proposed. - Bayshore Broadcasting News Centre [Last Updated On: February 15th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 15th, 2017]
- World Economic Forum blog: Canada's basic income experiment will it work? - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: February 15th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 15th, 2017]
- Expert: We Can Have Universal Basic Income and Jobs - Futurism - Futurism [Last Updated On: February 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 18th, 2017]
- Ben Wray: Why both the right to work and the right not to work can set us free - CommonSpace [Last Updated On: February 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 20th, 2017]
- VIDEO: Basic Income presentation at Meeting of the Minds Summit - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: February 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 22nd, 2017]
- Australia Needs A Universal Basic Income, And We Should Start ... - Huffington Post Australia [Last Updated On: February 24th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 24th, 2017]
- Bill Gates: The World Isn't Ready for Universal Basic Income - Futurism [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- A guaranteed income isn't the solution to widespread unemployment - Acton Institute (blog) [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- Basic Income's Radical Role - Social Europe [Last Updated On: March 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 2nd, 2017]
- Industry body bats for universal basic income for women - Times of India [Last Updated On: March 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 8th, 2017]
- Basic Income in Argentine News - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: March 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 10th, 2017]
- Basic-income guarantee is way to end poverty - Times Colonist [Last Updated On: March 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 11th, 2017]
- Paul, Darity, and Hamilton, Why We Need a Federal Job Guarantee - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: March 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 17th, 2017]
- Universal Basic Income plan won't end govt's responsibilities: CEA - Hindu Business Line [Last Updated On: March 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 21st, 2017]
- What Kitchener said about Ontario's basic income pilot project - CBC - CBC.ca [Last Updated On: March 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 21st, 2017]
- NEW BOOK Financing Basic Income: Addressing the Cost Objection - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: March 29th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 29th, 2017]
- Compass Blog Series: "Universal Basic Income: Security for the ... - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: March 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 31st, 2017]
- Evidence Indicates That Universal Basic Income Improves Human Health - Futurism [Last Updated On: March 31st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 31st, 2017]
- Kingston documentary focuses on BIG local and global movement - www.kingstonregion.com/ [Last Updated On: April 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 12th, 2017]
- Martin Sandbu, Money can buy you work - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: April 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 12th, 2017]
- Universal basic income can work only if welfare schemes are phased out: CEA Arvind Subramanian - Financial Express [Last Updated On: April 19th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 19th, 2017]
- Guaranteed income won't help women: Opinion - Toronto Star [Last Updated On: April 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 21st, 2017]
- Province chooses Lindsay as one location to launch Basic Income Guarantee pilot project - Kawartha Media Group [Last Updated On: April 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 25th, 2017]
- Community pitching together puts Lindsay on the list for Basic Income Guarantee pilot - Kawartha Media Group [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2017]
- David Green, GETTING PAID TO DO NOTHING: WHY THE IDEA OF CHINA'S DIBAO IS CATCHING ON - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2017]
- Basic Income pilot critical for reducing food insecurity: health unit - www.muskokaregion.com/ [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2017]
- Former Greek Finance Minister: Universal Basic Income Is Now A Necessity - Mintpress News (blog) [Last Updated On: May 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 7th, 2017]
- THE NETHERLANDS: Social Assistance Experiments Under Review - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: May 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 9th, 2017]
- The case for and against a universal basic income in the United States - Vox [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2017]
- Looking at Basic Income Guarantee and First Nations - Net Newsledger [Last Updated On: May 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 17th, 2017]
- NPI report asks if income guarantee will benefit First Nations - The Sudbury Star [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2017]
- Income guarantee program must include First Nations: Report - The North Bay Nugget [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2017]
- Greens to unveil plans for universal basic income in manifesto launch - The Guardian [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2017]
- Basic Income Guarantee: Can it be a sustainable solution ... [Last Updated On: May 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 22nd, 2017]
- The BIG misunderstanding about the cost of Universal Basic Income - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: May 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 28th, 2017]
- Is $17000 a good enough starting point for basic income? - Yahoo News Canada (blog) [Last Updated On: May 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 30th, 2017]
- Mark Zuckerberg supports universal basic income - PLoS Blogs (blog) [Last Updated On: May 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 30th, 2017]
- Podcast: Uncovering the town that overcame poverty - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: June 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 3rd, 2017]
- About That Universal Basic Income Idea - FITSNews [Last Updated On: June 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 3rd, 2017]
- Letters: Guaranteed income guarantees sloth. | The Province - The Province [Last Updated On: June 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 5th, 2017]
- Universal basic income: guarantee pay as way to improve quality of life - WatertownDailyTimes.com [Last Updated On: June 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 5th, 2017]
- Basic income plan doable: Northern study - The Sudbury Star [Last Updated On: June 5th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 5th, 2017]
- Study of Iran's basic income shows it did not harm employment - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? - KPNX 12 News TV [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2017]
- Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? - 9NEWS.com [Last Updated On: June 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 22nd, 2017]
- Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? - KHOU [Last Updated On: June 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 26th, 2017]
- Net incomes under a Basic Income system - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: June 30th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 30th, 2017]
- Basic Income Guarantee program moving forward for 2000 Lindsay residents - Kawartha Media Group [Last Updated On: July 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 8th, 2017]
- UBI is just a bedtime story Elon Musk tells himself to help the super-wealthy sleep - Quartz [Last Updated On: July 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 14th, 2017]
- Does Basic Income Solve Anything? Grasp the Arguments for and ... - Futurism [Last Updated On: July 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 21st, 2017]
- Value in using tax system for basic income: Report - The Sudbury Star [Last Updated On: July 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 21st, 2017]
- NEW ORLEANS, LA, US: Local basic income group begins to hold monthly meetings - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: July 25th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 25th, 2017]
- More Calgarians struggle to feed their families over the summer months - CBC.ca [Last Updated On: July 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 26th, 2017]
- 9news.com | Should all Americans receive a guaranteed income? - 9NEWS.com [Last Updated On: July 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 26th, 2017]
- Peterborough businesses claim $15 minimum wage hike could result in job cuts - Globalnews.ca [Last Updated On: July 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 26th, 2017]
- EDITORIAL: Island needs dollars, not data, to cope with poverty - The Guardian [Last Updated On: July 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 27th, 2017]
- DON PRIDMORE: Be careful what you wish for... - The Guardian [Last Updated On: August 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 1st, 2017]
- Is a Well-Paying Job the next Entitlement Program? - Big Think (blog) [Last Updated On: August 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 6th, 2017]
- Universal basic income proponent to speak in Boise - Idaho Press-Tribune [Last Updated On: August 8th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 8th, 2017]
- New Zealand Fabians host Basic Income panel - Basic Income News [Last Updated On: August 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 14th, 2017]
- Universal Basic Infrastructure to help decrease India's poverty - Economic Times [Last Updated On: August 15th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 15th, 2017]
- How Cities Can Rebuild the Social Safety Net - CityLab [Last Updated On: August 20th, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 20th, 2017]
- Food shopping at dollar stores - Brantford Expositor [Last Updated On: August 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: August 22nd, 2017]
- California higher education hangs in the balance as UC, Cal State search for new leaders - Los Angeles Times [Last Updated On: November 30th, 2019] [Originally Added On: November 30th, 2019]
- Broadband for All could revolutionize wifi in UK, if it's possible - Inverse [Last Updated On: November 30th, 2019] [Originally Added On: November 30th, 2019]
- Want to Retire in Harmony? Make Sure All Parts of Your Plan Are in Sync - Kiplinger's Personal Finance [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2019] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2019]
- The Guardian view on Finlands new PM: a different type of leadership - The Guardian [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2019] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2019]
- A modern method of cutting poverty: Investigating what Universal Basic Income will mean for Northern families - Mancunian Matters [Last Updated On: December 13th, 2019] [Originally Added On: December 13th, 2019]
- We need to test whether our millions in education aid is actually working - Financial Post [Last Updated On: January 3rd, 2020] [Originally Added On: January 3rd, 2020]