What If College Students Have the Same Views on Free Speech As Everyone Else? – New York Magazine

Posted: May 6, 2017 at 3:25 am

Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE / campus culture wars May 5, 2017 05/05/2017 3:23 pm By Jesse Singal Share Photo: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

College students, you may have heard, are increasingly opposed to free speech. Especially liberal ones they just cant handle views they disagree with, especially conservative ones. Except: It might be more complicated than that. Thats the takeaway of a new survey of Yale University students who made national headlines for an uproar over a Halloween-costume email back in 2015 summed up by James Freeman in The Wall Street Journal.

The survey was commissioned by the William F. Buckley Jr. Program at Yale, and there were 872 respondents. Freeman, who is on the board of that organization, notes that 72 percent of respondents were opposed to the idea of Yale having speech codes to regulate speech for students and faculty. And when presented with an either-or question about controversial views, 84% opted for intellectual diversity and just 5% favored muzzling people with controversial views.

Freeman cites this as both good news, from his point of view, and as a novel finding: The first sentence of his column is At last, theres hopeful news on intellectual liberty from a college campus. But this isnt entirely new, even for Yale. Last year, in the course of debunking some claims about how ostensibly anti-free-speech college students are, I highlighted a previous iteration of that same survey of Yale students which found that they generally reported being staunchly supportive of free-speech rights, at least when the question was asked in certain ways (the slide deck I reference doesnt appear to be available online anymore, unfortunately):

Now, surveys are complicated and susceptible to rather wild swings based on question wording, so it would be wrong to cherry-pick any limited set of findings and then make sweeping generalizations about college students these days. Plus, there were some items on the survey where students werent quite so free-speech-friendly. And it goes without saying that what happens at Yale might not be applicable to the rest of the college population.

But whats striking is, zooming out a little, just how little empirical evidence there is to suggest college students differ in big ways from the broader population when it comes to their support for free speech, despite how often we hear confident assertions that campuses are free-speech no-go zones. People clearly think there is a big difference and will sometimes point to survey evidence to support this view, the best recent-ish example being a Pew survey from a year and a half ago finding that 40 percent of students favored government bans on certain forms of offensive speech. I initially covered that finding as though it were alarming, but when I looked around at other past surveys of Americans views on free speech, it was clear that the 40 percent number wasnt an outlier. In other words, as I wrote in a subsequent mea culpa:

Part of whats going on here could come down to preference intensity and opportunity. By which I mean that college students who are in favor of expanding restrictions on free speech might feel relatively more strongly about it than do their pro-free-speech peers, and they have highly visible opportunities to express those views by attempting to no-platform speakers they dont like, or responding assertively to instances of perceived administrator insensitivity. Whenever they do so, of course or whenever they engage in any other act that can be portrayed as yet another instance of out-of-control college activists it gets blown up to the status of a national news story. Twenty years ago, no one would have heard of a small group of Oberlin students protesting about the cultural appropriation of Banh Mi going on at a dining hall there, or about any of the dozen other similar blowups that seem to occur on a monthly basis.

Furthermore, its very hard for stories that buck the trend stories about how most college students arent sent into conniptions by appropriated Banh Mi to get much traction because of the whole dog-bites-man thing: No one wants to write about college students who are acting like everyday American adults with fairly standard views on free speech. So while the phrase silent majority has some unfortunate political baggage affixed to it, it might accurately capture whats going on here. There may not have been much real, substantive movement in the anti-free-speech direction on campus a lot of kids dont see the need to ban or no-platform offensive speakers, but they arent in the streets about it, and may simply not want to bother stating their own views during those instances in which things get out of hand. Because theyre quiet, they dont get much coverage, skewing everyones view of college students as a group.

In Trumps America, Being Sexually Assaulted Could Make Your Health Insurance More Expensive

Why Is Stan Lees Legacy in Question?

Museum Donors Are Pissed Celebs Were Smoking in the Met Gala Bathrooms

This Is What a Modern-Day Witch Hunt Looks Like

Trumpcare Destroys Any Notion That American Conservatism Gives a Damn

Republican Blurts Out That Sick People Dont Deserve Affordable Care

Star Wars Superfan Adam Scott Quivers With Panic and Joy After Being Surprised by Mark Hamill

Exclusive! Sebastian Gorka Leaves a Note for His McDonalds Server

Whats New on Netflix: May 2017

One Personality Trait Predicts Domestic Nudity

Most Popular Video On Daily Intelligencer

In the new issue of its magazine, the terror group implores would-be jihadists to take advantage of Americas lax gun laws.

In rough justice for GOP candidate and voting-rights pariah Karen Handel, a judge has extended registration for her runoff contest with Jon Ossoff.

Oh gosh I dont think any individual has read the whole bill.

The Senate Intelligence Committee finally appears to be getting to work.

In 2018 Democrats can take advantage of millennial antipathy toward Donald Trump. But first they must address millennial antipathy toward voting.

Heres why House moderates voted for a more unpopular, right-wing version of a bill that was too unpopular and right-wing for them just weeks ago.

White House: The president didnt mean he loves socialized medicine. Trump: Yes, I really meant it.

Who needs the truth?

A new survey highlights the lack of good empirical evidence to suggest that college students are the free-speech enemies many suppose them to be.

Thats Sebastian Gorka, Ph.D.

While House passage of Trumpcare was essential for GOP plans, Senate concerns and procedures will make the next stage of the debate very different.

The position is not political and firings are extremely rare.

Murders are down about 13 percent compared to this time last year.

Whatever else it means, passage of Trumpcare spells trouble for the House Republicans especially Californians in tough districts who voted for it.

Despite the big bump in hiring, wages remained stagnant.

The presidents Twitter engagement has been on a steady decline since the inauguration.

North Korea accuses America of a lot of things. But this allegation is unusually detailed.

A callous abandonment of the American people.

Albany is considering a bill that would publish the state returns of certain elected officials.

He tells the public one story, while his staff tells the judge another.

Visit link:
What If College Students Have the Same Views on Free Speech As Everyone Else? - New York Magazine

Related Posts