How worried should we be about artificial intelligence?
Recently, I asked a number of AI researchers this question. The responses I received vary considerably; it turns out there is not much agreement about the risks or implications.
Non-experts are even more confused about AI and its attendant challenges. Part of the problem is that artificial intelligence is an ambiguous term. By AI one can mean a Roomba vacuum cleaner, a self-driving truck, or one of those death-dealing Terminator robots.
There are, generally speaking, three forms of AI: weak AI, strong AI, and superintelligence. At present, only weak AI exists. Strong AI and superintelligence are theoretically possible, even probable, but were not there yet.
Understanding the differences between these forms of AI is essential to analyzing the potential risks and benefits of this technology. There are a whole range of concerns that correspond to different kinds of AI, some more worrisome than others.
To help make sense of this, here are some key distinctions you need to know.
Artificial Narrow Intelligence (often called weak AI) is an algorithmic or specialized intelligence. This has existed for several years. Think of the Deep Blue machine that beat world champion Garry Kasparov in chess. Or Siri on your iPhone. Or even speech recognition and processing software. These are forms of nonsentient intelligence with a relatively narrow focus.
It might be too much to call weak AI a form of intelligence at all. Weak AI is smart and can outperform humans at a single task, but thats all it can do. Its not self-aware or goal-driven, and so it doesnt present any apocalyptic threats. But to the extent that weak AI controls vital software that keeps our civilization humming along, our dependence upon it does create some vulnerabilities. George Dvorsky, a Canadian bioethicist and futurist, explores some of these issues here.
Then theres Artificial General Intelligence, or strong AI; this refers to a general-purpose system, or what you might call a thinking machine. Artificial General Intelligence, in theory, would be as smart or smarter than a human being at a wide range of tasks; it would be able to think, reason, and solve complex problems in myriad ways.
Its debatable whether strong AI could be called conscious; at the very least, it would demonstrate behaviors typically associated with consciousness commonsense reasoning, natural language understanding, creativity, strategizing, and generally intelligent action.
Artificial General Intelligence does not yet exist. A common estimate is that were perhaps 20 years away from this breakthrough. But nearly everyone concedes that its coming. Organizations like the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (founded by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen) and Googles DeepMind project, along with many others across the world, are making incremental progress.
There are surely more complications involved with this form of AI, but its not the stuff of dystopian science fiction. Strong AI would aim at a general-purpose human level intelligence; unless it undergoes rapid recursive self-improvement, its unlikely to pose a catastrophic threat to human life.
The major challenges with strong AI are economic and cultural: job loss due to automation, economic displacement, privacy and data management, software vulnerabilities, and militarization.
Finally, theres Artificial Superintelligence. Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom defined this form of AI in a 2014 interview with Vox as any intellect that radically outperforms the best human minds in every field, including scientific creativity, general wisdom and social skills. When people fret about the hazards of AI, this is what theyre talking about.
A truly superintelligent machine would, in Bostroms words, become extremely powerful to the point of being able to shape the future according to its preferences. As yet, were nowhere near a fully developed superintelligence. But the research is underway, and the incentives for advancement are too great to constrain.
Economically, the incentives are obvious: The first company to produce artificial superintelligence will profit enormously. Politically and militarily, the potential applications of such technology are infinite. Nations, if they dont see this already as a winner-take-all scenario, are at the very least eager to be first. In other words, the technological arms race is afoot.
The question, then, is how far away from this technology are we, and what are the implications for human life?
For his book Superintelligence, Bostrom surveyed the top experts in the field. One of the questions he asked was, "by what year do you think there is a 50 percent probability that we will have human-level machine intelligence?" The median answer to that was somewhere between 2040 and 2050. That, of course, is just a prediction, but its an indication of how close we might be.
Its hard to know when an artificial superintelligence will emerge, but we can say with relative confidence that it will at some point. If, in fact, intelligence is a matter of information processing, and if we assume that we will continue to build computational systems at greater and greater processing speeds, then it seems inevitable that we will create an artificial superintelligence. Whether were 50 or 100 or 300 years away, we are likely to cross the threshold eventually.
When it does happen, our world will change in ways we cant possibly predict.
We cannot assume that a vastly superior intelligence is containable; it would likely work to improve itself, to enhance its capabilities. (This is what Bostrom calls the control problem.) A hyper-intelligent machine might also achieve self-awareness, in which case it would begin to develop its own ends, its own ambitions. The hope that such machines will remain instruments of human production is just that a hope.
If an artificial superintelligence does become goal-driven, it might develop goals incompatible with human well-being. Or, in the case of Artificial General Intelligence, it may pursue compatible goals via incompatible means. The canonical thought experiment here was developed by Bostrom. Lets call it the paperclip scenario.
Heres the short version: Humans create an AI designed to produce paperclips. It has one utility function to maximize the number of paperclips in the universe. Now, if that machine were to undergo an intelligence explosion, it would likely work to optimize its single function producing paperclips. Such a machine would continually innovate new ways to make more paperclips. Eventually, Bostrom says, that machine might decide that converting all of the matter it can including people into paperclips is the best way to achieve its singular goal.
Admittedly, this sounds a bit stupid. But its not, and it only appears so when you think about it from the perspective of a moral agent. Human behavior is guided and constrained by values self-interest, compassion, greed, love, fear, etc. An Advanced General Intelligence, presumably, would be driven only by its original goal, and that could lead to dangerous, and unanticipated, consequences.
Again, the paperclip scenario applies to strong AI, not superintelligence. The behavior of an a superintelligent machine would be even less predictable. We have no idea what such a being would want, or why it would want it, or how it would pursue the things it wants. What we can be reasonably sure of is that it will find human needs less important than its own needs.
Perhaps its better to say that it will be indifferent to human needs, just as human beings are indifferent to the needs of chimps or alligators. Its not that human beings are committed to destroying chimps and alligators; we just happen to do so when the pursuit of our goals conflicts with the wellbeing of less intelligent creatures.
And this is the real fear that people like Bostrom have of superintelligence. We have to prepare for the inevitable, he told me recently, and take seriously the possibility that things could go radically wrong.
See the original post here:
Why not all forms of artificial intelligence are equally scary - Vox
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies - Wikipedia ... [Last Updated On: June 13th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 13th, 2016]
- Top Ten Cybernetic Upgrades Everyone Will Want [Last Updated On: June 17th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 17th, 2016]
- Ethical Issues In Advanced Artificial Intelligence [Last Updated On: June 17th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 17th, 2016]
- How Long Before Superintelligence? - Nick Bostrom [Last Updated On: June 17th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 17th, 2016]
- Superintelligence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Last Updated On: June 17th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 17th, 2016]
- Nick Bostrom's Home Page [Last Updated On: June 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 19th, 2016]
- Superintelligence Audiobook | Nick Bostrom | Audible.com [Last Updated On: June 19th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 19th, 2016]
- Superintelligence Audiobook | Nick Bostrom | Audible.com [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2016]
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies | KurzweilAI [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2016]
- Superintelligence [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2016]
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies by Nick ... [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2016]
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies by Nick Bostrom ... [Last Updated On: June 25th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 25th, 2016]
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies | KurzweilAI [Last Updated On: June 25th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 25th, 2016]
- Parallel universes, the Matrix, and superintelligence ... [Last Updated On: June 28th, 2016] [Originally Added On: June 28th, 2016]
- Superintelligence - Nick Bostrom - Oxford University Press [Last Updated On: July 14th, 2016] [Originally Added On: July 14th, 2016]
- 'Superintelligence' enjoyable read | Community ... [Last Updated On: July 29th, 2016] [Originally Added On: July 29th, 2016]
- How Humanity Might Co-Exist with Artificial Superintelligence [Last Updated On: July 31st, 2016] [Originally Added On: July 31st, 2016]
- Future of AI 6. Discussion of 'Superintelligence: Paths ... [Last Updated On: August 10th, 2016] [Originally Added On: August 10th, 2016]
- Superintelligence by Nick Bostrom and A Rough Ride to the ... [Last Updated On: September 6th, 2016] [Originally Added On: September 6th, 2016]
- Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies | University ... [Last Updated On: October 17th, 2016] [Originally Added On: October 17th, 2016]
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies: Amazon.co.uk ... [Last Updated On: October 27th, 2016] [Originally Added On: October 27th, 2016]
- Superintelligence | Guardian Bookshop [Last Updated On: October 27th, 2016] [Originally Added On: October 27th, 2016]
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Why [Last Updated On: October 27th, 2016] [Originally Added On: October 27th, 2016]
- Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies: Amazon.co ... [Last Updated On: November 17th, 2016] [Originally Added On: November 17th, 2016]
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart People [Last Updated On: December 26th, 2016] [Originally Added On: December 26th, 2016]
- Will Machines Ever Outthink Us? - Huffington Post [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- Elon Musk's Surprising Reason Why Everyone Will Be Equal in the ... - Big Think [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- Experts have come up with 23 guidelines to avoid an AI apocalypse ... - ScienceAlert [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk Endorse 23 Asilomar Principles ... - Inverse [Last Updated On: February 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 6th, 2017]
- SoftBank's Fantastical Future Still Rooted in the Now - Wall Street Journal [Last Updated On: February 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 9th, 2017]
- The Moment When Humans Lose Control Of AI - Vocativ [Last Updated On: February 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 9th, 2017]
- Game Theory: Google tests AIs to see whether they'll fight or work together - Neowin [Last Updated On: February 10th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 10th, 2017]
- Simulation hypothesis: The smart person's guide - TechRepublic [Last Updated On: February 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 11th, 2017]
- Another Expert Joins Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk in Warning About the Dangers of AI - Futurism [Last Updated On: February 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 14th, 2017]
- Artificial Intelligence Is Not a ThreatYet - Scientific American [Last Updated On: February 14th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 14th, 2017]
- Elon Musk - 2 Things Humans Need to Do to Have a Good Future - Big Think [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2017]
- Don't Fear Superintelligent AICCT News - CCT News [Last Updated On: February 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 26th, 2017]
- Building A 'Collective Superintelligence' For Doctors And Patients Around The World - Forbes [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- Superintelligent AI explains Softbank's push to raise a $100BN Vision Fund - TechCrunch [Last Updated On: February 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: February 28th, 2017]
- Tech Leaders Raise Concern About the Dangers of AI - iDrop News [Last Updated On: March 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 1st, 2017]
- Disruptive by Design: Siri, Tell Me a Joke. No, Not That One. - Signal Magazine [Last Updated On: March 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 1st, 2017]
- Softbank CEO: The Singularity Will Happen by 2047 - Futurism [Last Updated On: March 1st, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 1st, 2017]
- Horst Simon to Present Supercomputers and Superintelligence at PASC17 in Lugano - insideHPC [Last Updated On: March 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 4th, 2017]
- US Navy reaches out to gamers to troubleshoot post-singularity world - Digital Trends [Last Updated On: March 19th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 19th, 2017]
- This New Species of AI Wants to Be "Superintelligent" When She Grows Up - Big Think [Last Updated On: March 23rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 23rd, 2017]
- Luna, The Most Human-like AI, Wants To Become Superintelligent In Future - Fossbytes [Last Updated On: March 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 27th, 2017]
- Friendly artificial intelligence - Wikipedia [Last Updated On: March 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 27th, 2017]
- Banking bots should get their version of Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics - TNW [Last Updated On: March 29th, 2017] [Originally Added On: March 29th, 2017]
- The Nonparametric Intuition: Superintelligence and Design Methodology - Lifeboat Foundation (blog) [Last Updated On: April 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 7th, 2017]
- Who is afraid of AI? - The Hindu [Last Updated On: April 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 7th, 2017]
- Limits to the Nonparametric Intuition: Superintelligence and Ecology - Lifeboat Foundation (blog) [Last Updated On: April 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 12th, 2017]
- The Guardian view on protein modelling: the answer to life, the universe and everything - The Guardian [Last Updated On: April 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 21st, 2017]
- David Hasselhoff Stars in a New Short Filmand All His Lines Were Written by AI - Singularity Hub [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2017]
- Apple's Tom Gruber, Co-Founder of Siri, Spoke at TED2017 Today about Augmented Memories and more - Patently Apple [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2017]
- Superintelligence and Public Opinion - NewCo Shift [Last Updated On: April 27th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 27th, 2017]
- Informatica Journal - Call for Special Issue on Superintelligence - Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies [Last Updated On: April 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: April 28th, 2017]
- BRAVO 25: YOUR A.I. THERAPIST WILL SEE YOU NOW Comes to the Actors Company - Broadway World [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2017]
- 'Artificial Superintelligence' is the First Game from the Makers of the Hilarious 'CARROT' Apps, Coming May 11th - Touch Arcade [Last Updated On: May 2nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 2nd, 2017]
- Multiple Intelligences, and Superintelligence - Freedom to Tinker [Last Updated On: May 6th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 6th, 2017]
- You're invited: Strategies for an Artificially Superintelligent Future - FutureFive NZ [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2017]
- U.S. Navy calls out to gamers for assistance with ... [Last Updated On: May 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 11th, 2017]
- Artificial Superintelligence is an interesting Sci-Fi take on Reigns swiping mechanic - Pocket Gamer [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2017]
- Listen, Meatbag! Artificial Superintelligence is a New Game Starring the Snarky Carrot AI - AppAdvice [Last Updated On: May 13th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 13th, 2017]
- Artificial Superintelligence review - Reigns for a new generation - Pocket Gamer [Last Updated On: May 17th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 17th, 2017]
- Artificial Superintelligence Review: Reigns Supreme? - Gamezebo [Last Updated On: May 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 18th, 2017]
- Summoning the Demon: Why superintelligence is humanity's ... - GeekWire [Last Updated On: May 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 26th, 2017]
- Summoning the Demon: Why superintelligence is humanity's biggest threat - GeekWire [Last Updated On: May 26th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 26th, 2017]
- Today's Kids Could Live Through Machine Superintelligence, Martian Colonies, and a Nuclear Attack - Motherboard [Last Updated On: May 28th, 2017] [Originally Added On: May 28th, 2017]
- The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence (PDF) [Last Updated On: June 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 3rd, 2017]
- A reply to Wait But Why on machine superintelligence [Last Updated On: June 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 3rd, 2017]
- Are You Ready for the AI Revolution and the Rise of Superintelligence? - TrendinTech [Last Updated On: June 7th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 7th, 2017]
- Using AI to unlock human potential - EJ Insight [Last Updated On: June 9th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 9th, 2017]
- Cars 3 gets back to what made the franchise adequate - Vox [Last Updated On: June 12th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 12th, 2017]
- Facebook Chatbots Spontaneously Invent Their Own Non-Human ... - Interesting Engineering [Last Updated On: June 18th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 18th, 2017]
- Effective Altruism Says You Can Save the Future by Making Money - Motherboard [Last Updated On: June 21st, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 21st, 2017]
- The bots are coming - The New Indian Express [Last Updated On: June 22nd, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 22nd, 2017]
- No need to fear Artificial Intelligence - Livemint - Livemint [Last Updated On: June 29th, 2017] [Originally Added On: June 29th, 2017]
- The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence | Inverse [Last Updated On: July 3rd, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 3rd, 2017]
- Integrating disciplines 'key to dealing with digital revolution' - Times Higher Education (THE) [Last Updated On: July 4th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 4th, 2017]
- To prevent artificial intelligence from going rogue, here is what Google is doing - Financial Express [Last Updated On: July 11th, 2017] [Originally Added On: July 11th, 2017]