Using Film to Tell a Personal History of America and Race – The New York Times

For over a decade, Jeffery Robinson has been telling an unvarnished history of the United States in an ever-evolving lecture presentation. His talks, now presented as part of his organization, the Who We Are Project, delve into how racism against Black people was bound up with the countrys legacy since its founding. The new documentary, Who We Are: A Chronicle of Racism in America, captures Robinsons eye-opening account (filmed at Town Hall in New York City) and intersperses interviews with civil rights figures and others from his travels across the country.

The film, directed by Emily and Sarah Kunstler, joins a lineage of documentaries that excavate race and the histories of marginalized people in America, like Raoul Pecks I Am Not Your Negro and Ava DuVernays 13th.

This is not Eyes on the Prize, Robinson said of the new movie, which is available on major digital platforms. But I think it is a call to us being something radically different going forward.

Reviewing Who We Are for The Times, Ben Kenigsberg made it a Critics Pick and wrote, Its a confrontational film, but never an alienating one.

Robinson, a criminal defense lawyer by profession, was the director of the A.C.L.U.s Trone Center for Justice and Equality in New York, and he remembers walking past the former Cotton Exchange on the way to work. I spoke with him and the Kunstlers (whose last feature, William Kunstler: Disturbing the Universe, was about their father, the civil rights attorney). These are excerpts from our interview.

Who We Are partly aims to chart the role of white supremacy in U.S. history. How did you approach that?

JEFFERY ROBINSON I say it as a rhetorical question in the film: What if I said America was founded on white supremacy? Somebody might say, Jeff, thats really extreme. But when you read the words of the people that founded our country and see what they did, I think its an inescapable conclusion. Some people have said the Constitution was a compromise between those who wanted slavery and those who didnt want slavery. This compromise protected the institution of slavery, gave the South extra congressional representatives and Electoral College votes to protect the institution of slavery, and made Black attempts to be free unconstitutional. It was unconstitutional for me to try and get away from my owner!

SARAH KUNSTLER And they accomplished all of that without using the word slavery. We have a history of hiding what we mean as a country. When we enact laws preserving and maintaining white supremacy, we dont actually say what it is that were doing.

ROBINSON There is no way you can associate white supremacy with a law that says you cannot change the name of iconic monuments in the state of Alabama until you understand that these are all monuments to slavery, essentially, and to people that enslaved people.

The film also uncovers the details of lived Black experience: for example, the fingerprints that enslaved builders left behind on walls they made.

EMILY KUNSTLER The facts in the abstract dont mean anything if you cant connect them to actual human experience. Those fingerprints are one example of a monument to a history of lived experience of enslaved Black people in Charleston, S.C., and in fact, all over this country, that despite the best efforts to erase them, persist. The same way the foundations for the houses in Tulsa, Okla., [site of the 1921 massacre], still exist where the homes were never rebuilt.

ROBINSON There was a moment when we were talking with Mother Randle [a survivor of the Tulsa massacre] and she was saying, There was a pile of bodies. There was just a chill that went up and down my spine this woman over 100 years old going back to that memory in her life.

Jeffery, how did it feel to share your, and your familys, experiences of racism, like the school basketball game where the hosts didnt want you to play?

ROBINSON We went to Dr. Tiffany Crutcher and asked her to talk about her feelings about her brother being killed on live television, practically, by the Tulsa police [in 2016]. And it felt like, All right, I should share something. Dick [a basketball coach who stuck up for Robinson] was 21 years old at the time this incident happened in Walls, Miss. This is just several years after civil rights workers got disappeared and murdered in Mississippi. Where he got the courage to handle that the way he did, I just dont know. But it was clear that if I didnt play, we were all leaving. And he wasnt going to put that on me at 12 years old. I think he saw me as essentially his younger brother.

Could you talk about including the conversation about slavery with a man you encountered at a Confederate statue who represented Flags Across the South, the pro-Confederate flag group?

EMILY KUNSTLER I felt like it encompassed the thesis of the film. I asked Jeff, Do you think that that gentleman could be reached? And Jeff said, I dont know if he can be reached, but I know that if nobody tries, he certainly wont be. Theres value in making the effort, theres value in laying out the facts and continuing to do so. We cant be frightened into silence by people who think differently, speak very loudly, and come out in force and wave Confederate flags.

ROBINSON The conversation didnt go the way he perhaps thought it was going to go in terms of me getting angry at him or something. Theres a little twitch in his face as we were leaving, and I think we at least made some wheels turn in his head.

How does the movie relate to the controversy around laws banning the teaching of certain American history?

ROBINSON The first time we met in person to talk about this [movie] was June 20, 2017. No one was even talking about CRT [Critical Race Theory] back then. It would have been like, What is that, a breakfast cereal or something? So this was not done in response to those laws. But those laws coming up can tell you how afraid people are of the information thats in this film.

This goes to the concept of the minds of the rising generation. All the way back in 1837, John C. Calhoun, one of the most virulent racists in American history, was saying that we cant teach children in school about the abolition of slavery, because if we teach that, slavery is done for. The day before the [Trump] administration left office, they put out something called The 1776 Report that talked about a return to patriotic education, and they use the exact same quote that John C. Calhoun did: the minds of the rising generation.

SARAH KUNSTLER Before there were anti-CRT laws, there were textbook wars. So theres an unending battle of what and how much our children are taught in school about our nations history. One of the most compelling things about Jeffs talk is that he goes back to primary sources. You dont need to just learn it in school. You can seek it out for yourself.

Read the rest here:

Using Film to Tell a Personal History of America and Race - The New York Times