New free book from Cambridge Press: Pantheism – Religion …

Location: Sun City West, Arizona

Reputation: 27518

Quote:

In part because I'm no longer learning anything new about anything Mystic has to explain. My shortcomings and deficiencies included. Here too we see how "perspective is everything." One man's lazy is another man's prudence. AKA good judgement and better use of time. Though I do falter along these lines more often than I would like.

Sometimes it's hard not to scratch an itch...

Reputation: 7010

Quote:

I have to admit that my eyes begin to glaze over.

Location: Sun City West, Arizona

Reputation: 27518

Quote:

That does tend to be the reaction that accompanies a lack of comprehension which seems to be fairly widespread among the atheists here.

There is always a lot of repetition in forums like this one...including me. After a while with almost any particular poster, it's just time to change the channel.

I may love Chinese orange chicken, but I can't eat it 365 days a year.

Location: Germany

Reputation: 1469

Quote:

That does tend to be the reaction that accompanies a lack of comprehension which seems to be fairly widespread among the atheists here.

So once again, instead of your usual arrogant pretense at being a superior intellect, start providing actual, rational evidence for your position instead of your usual fallacies and creationist arguments.

Location: Germany

Reputation: 1469

Quote:

What is strange is that you seem unable to recognize when someone has read the entire article and provided a summary of its essential features as they apply to those who do NOT comprehend what issues are involved.

2) Your 'summary' included elements NOT in the paper ('AI computational equivalence' which also shows an inability on your part to understand my actual position). That part of your 'summary' was just another invented excuse to ignore my extrapolation from data that you do not like.

3) Once again you falsely accuse me of an 'inability to conceive of the universe holistically' while pretending your composition fallacy nonsense is a legitimate argument.

4) it is still strange you have not talked about what is in the paper (your 'summary' is just that, and showed no awareness of the flaws in the paper), and still seems to be ignoring my post (8) where I showed what some of those flaws in the paper are.

Reputation: 784

Quote:

Ha, you still fail to understand the flaws in your arguments. Your Dueling Banjos Patois suggests why, but I do hate to generalize.

You remain all hung up on literal (mis)interpretations of allegorical and metaphorical ancient Theological writings...and base your opinion on the existence of God as to whether some Entity objectively exists that mirrors the Deity characters found in those writings.But it is YOUR argument that doesn't pan out.It's like saying that unless Superman, Batman, and The Flash actually exist...there is no such thing as a "Hero" that exists. And you conclude that, because you have read books that tell about those characters and their attributes, and call them "Heros".

Location: West Virginia

Reputation: 9591

Quote:

That does tend to be the reaction that accompanies a lack of comprehension which seems to be fairly widespread among the atheists here.

Location: Sun City West, Arizona

Reputation: 27518

Quote:

I don't think it is a lack of comprehension.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Read the original here:
New free book from Cambridge Press: Pantheism - Religion ...