Lawsuit To Stop Wisconsin Mask Mandates Is Bigger Than Court – The Federalist

After an unelected public health bureaucrat in Dane County, Wisconsin, issued a sweeping and unscientific mandate on Tuesday requiring indoor masking for everyone, including vaccinated people and even toddlers as young as two, one Wisconsin legal group is taking the fight once again to the state Supreme Court.

On behalf of a county resident, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) has filed an original action with the states high court urging the justices to review whether Janel Heinrich, the health officer, has the authority to issue a new county-wide mask mandate.

According to the courts recent COVID-related rulings, some of which are against this very bureaucrat, she does not. Back in June, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in James v. Heinrich that local health officers power is limited and must be bestowed specifically by legislators.

The state Supreme Court has struck down COVID-related overreaches in at least five cases, such as when Democrat Gov. Tony Evers tried to shut down elections and issue stay-at-home orders. When it became clear the governor didnt have unilateral authority over his constituents coronavirus response, unelected state and local officials stepped in to try imposing their will without legislative backing. The states high court has also struck down those attempts.

Here we go again, WILLs deputy counsel Dan Lennington told The Federalist. Local officials are trying to take legislative power and write their own laws, and require citizens to do things that the local official has no power to do.

The courts have made clear that unelected public health officers do not have unlimited authority, Lennington said. Yet again, on the eve of a new school year, Dane County has issued a breathtakingly bold order. Last time they tried to close all schools, this time they are requiring universal masking for anyone in an enclosed space, including two-year olds. Next time it could be vaccine passports. Dane Countys health officer, simply put, doesnt have the power to order universal masking, or anything else, without express legal authority.

Not only do court precedent and the law condemn Heinrichs diktats; common sense does too. One look at the data shows nobody is dying of the Wuhan virus in Dane County, which houses the states capital city of Madison. The line depicting average weekly COVID-19 deaths is steady at zero. The seven-day average has been zero deaths since the middle of May, when that average was a single death.

The last time the weekly average was higher than one was before Valentines Day. And in the last two weeks, only one death has been attributed to coronavirus in this county of more than half a million people, with statewide deaths down 34 percent in the same timeframe.

For these reasons and more for example, the side effects of pandemic mitigation such as a rapidly growing mental health crisis, a massive surge in drug overdoses, and a catastrophic blow to the education of children WILLs legal action is a welcomed development, and Lennington said hes very hopeful that the supreme court will take this. For healthy yet helpless residents of deep-blue Madison who are weary of getting the rug pulled out from under them, court action would help them reclaim that liberty and sanity.

But as Wisconsinites and Americans at large know, this fight is bigger than the courtroom. Usually, when Americans sit by and expect courts to step in and mitigate some of their most pressing concerns, theyre left with blessing of liberty like Drag Queen Story Hour and the American Civil Liberties Union gearing up to take a gentle grandmother florist for everything she owns.

A WILL victory would be a welcomed win for healthy Dane County residents, but for how long? The Wisconsin Supreme Court has already signaled that bureaucratic overreach is unacceptable, but that hasnt stopped power-hungry officials from pushing the limits and issuing sweeping and invasive orders anyway.

On the flip side, if the court doesnt respond positively to WILLs lawsuit, were right back to a masked-up square one, with health elites even more emboldened and healthy citizens once again completely helpless.To that end, it isnt simply WILLs responsibility to protect our liberties. Its our duty too and the stakes are high.

Wisconsinites must refuse to play into the political games of the ruling class by masking up, as the scientific and empirical evidence is stacked against their decrees. Dont believe the lie that mandatory masking is a minor inconvenience. In a county where nobody is dying of COVID, complying with masks is much more than that: Its a visible sign of allegiance to sadistic elites and their power-drunk delusions.

The unasked question when a healthy Dane County resident walks indoors is, Will you play the puppeteers pandemic game? If you cover your face, you affirm that you will, and the powerful get more power.

If we ever want to live free, really truly free, we must stop putting on a mask just to avoid confrontation despite knowing that at this point, its a farce. If not after a year and a half and zero average deaths, then when?

If Dane County can get away with this, then any local official in the state can get away with the same power, Lennington told The Federalist. Whats next? Vaccine passports? Mandatory masks? Permanent masks?

The question here isnt about whether masks are useful. As Lennington said, the question is Who will decide what law is going to be? Will it be elected officials or unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats?

This isnt just a query for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Its a question for you.

The rest is here:

Lawsuit To Stop Wisconsin Mask Mandates Is Bigger Than Court - The Federalist