BARONE: Speech suppression is habit-forming The North State Journal – North State Journal

President Joe Biden speaks about the economy and his infrastructure agenda in the State Dining Room of the White House, in Washington, Monday, July 19th, 2021. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Speech suppression is a habit that the Biden administration and its liberal supporters cant seem to break. Many staffers may have picked up the habit in their student years: Colleges and universities have been routinely censoring politically incorrect speech for the last 30 years. As Thomas Sowell noted, There are no institutions in America where free speech is more severely restricted than in our politically correct colleges and universities, dominated by liberals.

Now, the Biden administration seems to be giving the colleges and universities some serious competition. Like many Democrats during the Trump presidency, they have come to see suppression of fake news as the ordinary course of business and indeed a prime responsibility of social media platforms.

For decades, print and broadcast media have been dominated by liberals, but Facebook, Google and Twitter have developed a stranglehold over the delivery of news which exceeds anything that the three major broadcast networks and a few national newspapers every enjoyed. If they suppress a story or a line of argument, it largely disappears from public view. And to the extent that it lingers, it can be stigmatized by these multibillion-dollar companies as misinformation or fake news.

Speech suppression was exactly what White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki had in mind last week when she called on Facebook to suppress 12 accounts that she said were spreading misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. These accounts, she said July 15, were producing 65% of vaccine misinformation on social media platforms.

Facebook needs to move more quickly to remove harmful, violative posts. Posts that would be within their policy for removal often remain up for days, and thats too long. The information spreads too quickly.

And she wasnt aiming her demand at just Facebook. You shouldnt be banned from one platform and not others, she added a day later. The message was surely not lost on these companies, whose fabulously successful business models are vulnerable to government disruption.

Like most speech suppressors, Psaki protested her good intentions. As did her boss, President Joe Biden, who, when asked about Facebook on Friday, said simply, Theyre killing people. The implication is that any advice contrary to the current recommendations of public health officials contrary to the science is bound to increase the death toll.

This is more in line with Cardinal Bellarmines view of science than Galileos. As Galileo knew, science is not acceptance of holy writ but learning from observation and experiment. Today, in dealing with a novel and deadly virus, current science is a body of hypotheses only partly tested and subject to revision based on emerging evidence.

Theres a long list of things once believed to be misinformation about COVID that are now widely accepted. One prime example: the possibility that the coronavirus was accidentally released from the Wuhan lab. For more than a year, this was widely treated as a wacky right-wing conspiracy theory. Facebook slapped warnings on it and boasted that it reduced readership i.e., suppressed speech.

Then, in May, former New York Times science writer Nicholas Wade, in an article that Facebook let slip through, argued a lab leak was likelier than animal-to-human transmission, and a group of 18 bioscientists called for a deeper investigation. The Biden administration, to its credit, soon reversed itself and opened its own investigation and, reportedly, multiple officials now believe the lab leak theory is likely correct. Some misinformation!

That example provides powerful support for Galileos view that debate over scientific matters takes place best out in the open. But of course the urge to suppress speech is not limited to science. As conservative commentator Stephen L. Miller wrote, Removing information on vaccines will translate right over to anything they think is misinformation on gun violence, or climate, or healthcare or what defines a man or woman. Which is why they are doing this.

If you think thats extravagant, consider that, as Townhalls Guy Benson argued, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been stretching its ambit to studying gun violence and climate change even while letting its core mission of advancing public health atrophy, as shown by its inability to produce a COVID test.

Its easy to imagine this administration pressuring Facebook and other social media to suppress information on other issues. For example, as the New York Posts Michael Goodwin noted, his papers negative stories about Hunter Bidens shady business dealings, which were largely blocked from public view in the weeks before the 2020 election.

Speech suppression is evidently habit-forming. Which is why a constitutional amendment was passed back in the 1790s guaranteeing freedom of speech, and of the press. Or is that obsolete in these modern times?

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and longtime co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.

Read more:
BARONE: Speech suppression is habit-forming The North State Journal - North State Journal