The word Caucasian is racist and must be banned, say academics – Telegraph.co.uk

One of the five authors, who all contributed equally, is Dr Adam Rutherford, a prominent science communicator, author, broadcaster and an Honorary Senior Research Associate at UCL.

He announced the new paper, which he says has been accepted by a journal but not yet published, on his Twitter feed.

"I have been working on this a while: sparking a conversation about the lexicon of genetics, which continues to utilise scientifically redundant, confusing and racist terminology,"he said. "We're definitely not prescribing or policing language, but want to prompt a dialogue with colleagues in similar and adjacent fields about our terminology, datasets and tools, and move towards a lexicon that both serves the science and frees us from a racist past."

Dr Ewan Birney, deputy director of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory at the Wellcome Genome Campus in Cambridgeshire, is also a co-author of the article.

He explains that beyond dropping Caucasian, other terms should also be avoided, including ethnicity labels -such as"Native American", "Hispanic"and "White Irish"-and cultural terms such as "European".

Dr Birney and his colleagues advocate for scientists to replace these commonly used words and phrases with more complex language, based around a two-step genetic analysis.

As a result, he says this more technical language would see the label of "European replaced with "The European-associated PCA cluster, which aims to minimise variation in non-genetic factors and genetic factors".

This suggestion is, by Dr Birneys own admission, "bamboozling"and "a bit complex"for non-geneticists.

PCA - orprincipal component analysis - is a tool for analysing genes that picks up similar physical or biochemical characteristics of species,

However, in the article the scientists say they prioritised "technical accuracy over concision".

"Some of these suggestions may meet with disagreement; we present them partly to stimulate discussion of these and other terms, and in the hope that this will lead to better and more accurate language conventions and less misunderstanding, particularly outside of human genetics,"the researchers add.

Dr Aylwyn Scally is another of the authors. Heworks in the genetics department at the University of Cambridge and is based at Darwin College.

Darwin College was set up and named after Sir Charles Galton Darwin -a noted proponent of eugenics and grandson of Charles Darwin -upon his death in 1962.

In a tweet, Dr Scally revealed the opinion piece he co-authored received "constructive input"from Dr Agustin Fuentes, a professor of anthropology at Princeton University, who last month penned a scathing editorial criticisingCharles Darwin.

He accused him of letting his scientific process become "warped" by his prejudices, which included racism, sexism and misogyny.

Dr Michael Inouye, of the University of Cambridge, and Dr Jennifer Raff, of the University of Kansas, also co-authored the article.

The rest is here:
The word Caucasian is racist and must be banned, say academics - Telegraph.co.uk