How a Conservative Activist Invented the Conflict Over Critical Race Theory – The New Yorker

Remote work turned out to be advantageous for people looking to leak information to reporters. Instructions that once might have been given in conversation now often had to be written down and beamed from one home office to another. Holding a large meeting on Zoom often required e-mailing supporting notes and materialsmore documents to leak. Before the pandemic, if you thought that an anti-racism seminar at your workplace had gone awry, you had to be both brave and sneaky to record it. At home, it was so much easier. Zoom allowed you to record and take screenshots, and if you were worried that such actions could be traced you could use your cell phone, or your spouses cell phone, or your friends. Institutions that had previously seemed impenetrable have been pried open: Amazon, the I.R.S., the U.S. Treasury. But some less obviously tectonic leaks have had a more direct political effect, as was the case in July, 2020, when an employee of the city of Seattle documented an anti-bias training session and sent the evidence to a journalist named Christopher F. Rufo, who read it and recognized a political opportunity.

Rufo, thirty-six, was at once an unconventional and a savvy choice for the leaker to select. Raised by Italian immigrants in Sacramento and educated at Georgetown, Rufo had spent his twenties and early thirties working as a documentary filmmaker, largely overseas, making touristic projects such as Roughing It: Mongolia, and Diamond in the Dunes, about a joint Uyghur-Han baseball team in the Chinese province of Xinjiang. In 2015, Rufo began work on a film for PBS that traced the experience of poverty in three American cities, and in the course of filming Rufo became convinced that poverty was not something that could be alleviated with a policy lever but was deeply embedded in social, familial, even psychological dynamics, and his politics became more explicitly conservative. Returning home to Seattle, where his wife worked for Microsoft, Rufo got a small grant from a regional, conservative think tank to report on homelessness, and then ran an unsuccessful campaign for city council, in 2018. His work so outraged Seattles homelessness activists that, during his election campaign, someone plastered his photo and home address on utility poles around his neighborhood. When Rufo received the anti-bias documents from the city of Seattle, he knew how to spot political kindling. These days, Im a brawler, Rufo told me cheerfully.

Through FOIA requests, Rufo turned up slideshows and curricula for the Seattle anti-racism seminars. Under the auspices of the citys Office for Civil Rights, employees across many departments were being divided up by race for implicit-bias training. (Welcome: Internalized Racial Superiority for White People, read one introductory slide, over an image of the Seattle skyline.) What do we do in white people space? read a second slide. One bullet point suggested that the attendees would be working through emotions that often come up for white people like sadness, shame, paralysis, confusion, denial. Another bullet point emphasized retraining, learning new ways of seeing that are hidden from us in white supremacy. A different slide listed supposed expressions of internalized white supremacy, including perfectionism, objectivity, and individualism. Rufo summarized his findings in an article for the Web site of City Journal, the magazine of the center-right Manhattan Institute: Under the banner of antiracism, Seattles Office of Civil Rights is now explicitly endorsing principles of segregationism, group-based guilt, and race essentialismugly concepts that should have been left behind a century ago.

The story was a phenomenon and helped to generate more leaks from across the country. Marooned at home, civil servants recorded and photographed their own anti-racism training sessions and sent the evidence to Rufo. Reading through these documents, and others, Rufo noticed that they tended to cite a small set of popular anti-racism books, by authors such as Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo. Rufo read the footnotes in those books, and found that they pointed to academic scholarship from the nineteen-nineties, by a group of legal scholars who referred to their work as critical race theory, in particular Kimberl Crenshaw and Derrick Bell. These scholars argued that the white supremacy of the past lived on in the laws and societal rules of the present. As Crenshaw recently explained, critical race theory found that the so-called American dilemma was not simply a matter of prejudice but a matter of structured disadvantages that stretched across American society.

This inquiry, into the footnotes and citations in the documents hed been sent, formed the basis for an idea that has organized cultural politics this spring: that the anti-racism seminars did not just represent a progressive view on race but that they were expressions of a distinct ideologycritical race theorywith radical roots. If people were upset about the seminars, Rufo wanted them also to notice critical race theory operating behind the curtain. Following the trail back through the citations in the legal scholars texts, Rufo thought that he could detect the seed of their ideas in radical, often explicitly Marxist, critical-theory texts from the generation of 1968. (Crenshaw said that this was a selective, red-baiting account of critical race theorys origins, which overlooked less divisive influences such as Martin Luther King, Jr.) But Rufo believed that he could detect a single lineage, and that the same concepts and terms that organized discussions among white employees of the city of Seattle, or the anti-racism seminars at Sandia National Laboratories, were present a half century ago. Look at Angela Davisyou see all of the key terms, Rufo said. Davis had been Herbert Marcuses doctoral student, and Rufo had been reading her writing from the late sixties to the mid-seventies. He felt as if he had begun with a branch and discovered the root. If financial regulators in Washington were attending seminars in which they read Kendis writing that anti-racism was not possible without anti-capitalism, then maybe that was more than casual talk.

As Rufo eventually came to see it, conservatives engaged in the culture war had been fighting against the same progressive racial ideology since late in the Obama years, without ever being able to describe it effectively. Weve needed new language for these issues, Rufo told me, when I first wrote to him, late in May. Political correctness is a dated term and, more importantly, doesnt apply anymore. Its not that elites are enforcing a set of manners and cultural limits, theyre seeking to reengineer the foundation of human psychology and social institutions through the new politics of race, Its much more invasive than mere correctness, which is a mechanism of social control, but not the heart of whats happening. The other frames are wrong, too: cancel culture is a vacuous term and doesnt translate into a political program; woke is a good epithet, but its too broad, too terminal, too easily brushed aside. Critical race theory is the perfect villain, Rufo wrote.

He thought that the phrase was a better description of what conservatives were opposing, but it also seemed like a promising political weapon. Its connotations are all negative to most middle-class Americans, including racial minorities, who see the world as creative rather than critical, individual rather than racial, practical rather than theoretical. Strung together, the phrase critical race theory connotes hostile, academic, divisive, race-obsessed, poisonous, elitist, anti-American. Most perfect of all, Rufo continued, critical race theory is not an externally applied pejorative. Instead, its the label the critical race theorists chose themselves.

Last summer, Rufo published several more pieces for City Journal, and, on September 2nd, he appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight. Rufo had prepared a three-minute monologue, to be uploaded to a teleprompter at a Seattle studio, and he had practiced carefully enough that when a teleprompter wasnt available he still remembered what to say. On air, set against the deep-blue background of Fox News, he told Carlson, Its absolutely astonishing how critical race theoryhe said those three words slowly, for emphasishas pervaded every aspect of the federal government. Carlsons face retracted into a familiar pinched squint while Rufo recounted several of his articles. Then he said what hed come to say: Conservatives need to wake up. This is an existential threat to the United States. And the bureaucracy, even under Trump, is being weaponized against core American values. And Id like to make it explicit: The President and the White Houseits within their authority to immediately issue an executive order to abolish critical-race-theory training from the federal government. And I call on the President to immediately issue this executive orderto stamp out this destructive, divisive, pseudoscientific ideology.

The next morning, Rufo was home with his wife and two sons when he got a phone call from a 202 area code. The man on the other end, Rufo recalled, said, Chris, this is Mark Meadows, chief of staff, reaching out on behalf of the President. He saw your segment on Tucker last night, and hes instructed me to take action. Soon after, Rufo flew to Washington, D.C., to assist in drafting an executive order, issued by the White House in late September, that limited how contractors providing federal diversity seminars could talk about race. This entire movement came from nothing, Rufo wrote to me recently, as the conservative campaign against critical race theory consumed Twitter each morning and Fox News each night. But the truth is more specific than that. Really, it came from him.

Last Thursday, I travelled to visit Rufo at home in Gig Harbor, Washington, a small city on the Puget Sound with the faint but ineradicable atmosphere of early retirementof pier-side low-exertion midmorning yoga classes. Rufo has a thin, brown beard and an inquisitive, outdoorsy manner, and when we met for lunch on a local cafs veranda he spoke about his political commitments (to conservatism against critical race theory) loudly enough for those around us to hear. Rufo and his wife, Suphatra, a computer programmer at Amazon Web Services who emigrated from Thailand in elementary school, moved to Gig Harbor last year, in part to get away from the intense political climate that had coalesced around him in Seattle. The move had coincided with his increasing prominence, and so Gig Harbor had not been as professionally isolating as he had at first feared. Wearing a gray flannel shirt and dark jeans, Rufo showed me the soundproofed home studio hed recently built, with a hookup to send a broadcast-quality signal to Fox News.

Since his appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight last fall, Rufos rise had matched that of the movement against critical race theory. Hed become a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, for which he had written more than two dozen document-based articlesmostly about anti-bias training in the government, schools, and corporationswhich, he told me, had together accrued more than two hundred and fifty million impressions online. (Thats a lot, he said.) Carlson has been an especially effective ally; he relied on Rufos reporting for an hour-long episode this spring on woke education, and invited Rufo to join as a segment guest. Conservatives in state legislatures across the country have proposed (and, in some cases, passed) legislation banning or restricting critical-race-theory instruction or seminars; Rufo has advised on the language for more than ten bills. When Ron DeSantis and Tom Cotton have tweeted about critical race theory, they have borrowed Rufos phrases. He has travelled to Washington, D.C., to speak to an audience of two dozen members of Congress, and mentioned in passing that earlier in May hed had drinks with Ted Cruz. In the 2016 Presidential election, Rufo had cast a dissenters vote for Gary Johnson. In 2020, he voted to relect Trump. Rufo said, I mean, how can you not? It would have seemed rude and ungrateful.

Rufos new position did not give him just a view up, into the world of Republican power, but down, into the mounting outrage at anti-racism programs across the country. Rufo set up a tip line last October, and has so far received thousands of tips, many of which he thought were substantive. (An assistant does the culling.) From among this pile, hed discovered that third graders in Cupertino, California, were being asked to rank themselves and their classmates according to their privilege; he also learned about a three-day whiteness retreat for white male executives at Lockheed Martin and an initiative at Disney urging executives to decolonize their bookshelves. Some of the outrage appeared to have been ginned up by local political actorsa particularly combative and high-profile anti-C.R.T. parents group in Loudoun County was organized by a former Trump Justice Department officialbut it was nonetheless deeply felt. In Loudoun, one parent had said, If you spend millions to call people in our community racist, you better be able to prove it.

Read more:

How a Conservative Activist Invented the Conflict Over Critical Race Theory - The New Yorker