Monthly Archives: September 2023

Sun Valley Vanguards Noah Griffin rushes to the promise land over … – PA Football News

Posted: September 17, 2023 at 11:47 am

Tagged under: District 1, Gameday Hub, News

Ted Podberesky | September 15, 2023

West Chesters Henderson Warriors hosted the Sun Valley Vanguards tonight, looking to build from their win last week and continue their success. Sun Valley came into this game striving for revenge after a tough loss in week three of their season. The Vanguards showed true pride this Thursday night, coming to Henderson and taking home their first win of the season over the Warriors 33-30.

Henderson received the ball to start the game and wasted no time, coming out and showing a true passing attack. Sun Valley however, was ready for this kind of offense stopping the Warriors after a couple first downs and was given the ball after a punt. From there it was the start of running back Noah Griffins show.

It only took a couple plays for the Vanguards to score, keeping the ball on the ground and letting Noah Griffin rumble for a 57 yard touchdown. With five minutes remaining in the first the Warriors offense got to work with quarterback Braeden OConnell, who spread the rock all over tonight with his weapons downfield. Unfortunately, on this drive Henderson was only able to come away with a field goal with time winding down in the quarter.

Sun Valley kept the ball on the ground after the made field goal from the Warriors, showing no signs of slowing down their running game heading into the second quarter. Henderson had other things in mind however, plugging up the run with linebacker Charlie Watson and defensive end Logan Goodwin.

Braeden OConnell capitalized from the defensive stop and threw a beautiful spiral down the numbers to his wide receiver Seamus Murphy for a 54 yard touchdown. The Warriors were right back in the game leading the Vanguards 10-7. Sun Valley was stopped once again after getting the ball back and was forced to punt.

The Vanguards defense showed up big tonight with multiple tackles behind the line of scrimmage led by senior linebacker Ryan Creegan, who totaled the pack with four tackles for loss. Sun Valley made a big stop on third down inside their own territory and forced Henderson to try a field goal with just under three minutes remaining in the second quarter.

The snap was shot over the head of the holder and safety Matt Jackson for Sun Valley recovered. Quarterback RJ Sharrer quickly found his big tight end Aidan Cook over the middle for a 30 yard gain. Sharrer eventually found himself in the endzone making one man miss and tumbling in for the score on an 11 yard run. The Vanguards now led the Warriors 13-10 after a missed extra point to head into halftime.

Sun Valley got the ball back for the start of the third quarter and wasted no time going back to their tight end Aidan Cook, who caught a pass from Sharrer and ran for 67 yards. Running back Noah Griffin continued his game on the ground with a couple runs, before punching in an 8 yard touchdown run.

It wasnt long until Braeden OConnell commanded his offense down the field once again and found Evan Kearney who made a leaping 22 yard touchdown catch. With Henderson missing the extra point the score was 20-16 with a little over three minutes to go in the quarter. The Vanguards were soon stopped after getting the ball back with big tackles led by linebacker Aaron Nelson and cornerback Jake Ball.

The Warriors air raid game plan was still in full effect, mixing in plays with running back Matt Wagner. Henderson drove down the field into Sun Valley territory with ease before running into linebacker Ryan Creegan once again. OConnell threw a ball over the middle and was intercepted almost immediately by Creegan, who ran for green grass ahead on a 75 yard pick six.

Henderson blocked the extra point and got the ball back with under a minute to go in the third, Matt Wagner took some small runs before heading into the fourth. It was an all out war in the fourth quarter coming down to the last five final minutes of the game. With the Vanguards leading 26-16 Henderson needed a big play from some big time players, and thats exactly what happened.

With five minutes remaining in the quarter the Warriors dialed up a screen pass to Matt Wagner who caught the ball and ran for 64 yards down the field before being pushed out of bounds by Matt Jackson. The very next play OConnell found Evan Kearney on a 26 yard touchdown play.

The Vanguards kept the ball on the ground, chewing up the clock making sure the Warriors couldnt get it back. That was until Noah Griffin made a statement, breaking tackles and getting to the outside running down the sideline in a foot race to score a 69 yard touchdown.Sun Valley had pushed their lead to a two score game once again, looking to close out a win.

With the high powered offense that Henderson contained they still werent out of this game however. With two minutes remaining in the fourth OConnell kept finding his weapons, throwing a strike to junior Evan Stiles who was tackled down after a gain of 66 yards. The big play set up yet another touchdown for the Warriors after a busted coverage let Evan Kearney wide open to score his third touchdown of the game.

The Warriors got a stop on the Vanguards and got the ball back with under a minute to go, but it wasnt enough time. The Vanguards held the Warriors to a fourth down and forced a turnover on downs with eighteen seconds remaining. RJ Sharrer took a knee for the Vanguards to secure their first win of the season.

Head Coach Ernie Ellis for the Sun Valley Vanguards said after the game that, We showed extreme grit and when it came down to our moment we made the most of our opportunities, these young men deserved a win tonight and they got one.

Running Back Noah Griffin for Sun Valley who had a monster game on the ground with 247 rushing yards to pair with 3 touchdowns said that, Wins keep me motivated, these types of games with the teammates I play with goes a long way. Without my teammates and family none of this would be possible.

Linebacker Ryan Creegan for the Vanguards who combined for 9 solo tackles and 4 tackles for loss to go with a 75 yard pick six stated that, When Noah and I are on the field our energy is unmatched, we always seem to get things done. I guess you can say hes the O to my J.

Quarterback Braeden OConnell for the Henderson Warriors who had a spectacular game through the air, passing for over 260 yards and 4 touchdowns said that, The receivers and I have an unbreakable bond that goes a long way and I think that shows every time we step out onto the field, building a culture is what were here for and we have to keep doing that day in and day out.

Sun Valley takes on Avon Grove next week at home, while West Chester Henderson travels to Downingtown West.

Follow PA Football News on Twitter @PaFootballNews

Continue reading here:

Sun Valley Vanguards Noah Griffin rushes to the promise land over ... - PA Football News

Posted in Rockall | Comments Off on Sun Valley Vanguards Noah Griffin rushes to the promise land over … – PA Football News

Fire Up The Delorean – I Constructed A Roster Of Barstool … – Barstool Sports

Posted: at 11:47 am

OL/DL - Taylor Lewan

Giphy Images.

Do I have to go into detail? My man could likely block the entire DL himself in 1940 with that wingspan plus his mustache certainly fits.

TE/DE - Billy Football

Giphy Images.

They didn't really have TEs back then but this is okay because I need another big dude to block and as we know, Billy can't really catch the ball anyway.

Specialist - WSD

No, I don't mean specialist in the sense that I need a punter/kicker. I mean this as the guy who goes in the same to dive at the other team's best player's knees. I feel like that was an acceptable practice in 1940 and although I don't condone dirty play, there is no controlling that raccoon boy.

TE/LB - Will Compton

Giphy Images.

If Will played pro ball in 1940 we would be firmly in year 10 and that's not up for debate. Massive glue guy. All heart. Not to mention he could have a bookie on the side and the NFL would be none the wiser.

OL/LB - Trent

If you're new, educate yourself by watching the video above. Trent is the definition of a lunch pail guy and that is exactly how you win football games in 1940. Plus I think in 1940 the more Midwest guys you have the better.

OL - Large

Listen. I need to fill the roster and I'm pretty sure Large would be the biggest guy in the league in 1940. Plus, he has gout and I think that was a lot more common in 1940. He can't move all that well these days but did you watch the highlights? No one was setting the world on fire with how nimble they were.

OL - Big T

His size. That's it. I have no clue if he's played a down of football in his life.

FB/DL/K -PFT

Toughness is a prerequisite for 1940s football and anyone willing to play rugby certainly has a few screws loose. Not to mention, we need a kickereven though I don't think we will ever really find ourselves in 4th down situations.

OL/DL -Feits

Giphy Images.

Some of you are thinking, isn't Feits small to play OL? In 1940 he ain't and not to mention, he has the hands of a brick layer so he will fit right in no problem. Also, he can be the one to hand out the cigarettes and whiskey at halftime.

Get Him On The Field Somewhere - Biz

Giphy Images.

Flat out, he has much too much experience with contact to not be out there somewhere. It's entirely possible he gets himself banned from the league for fighting but damn if I don't want him on my team.

OL/DL/LB - Chief, Carl, Smitty

Chief will cry if he's not part of the hypothetical that includes us playing against his beloved Notre Dame in their heyday. Carl's size and arm strength makes him a valuable asset. CTE didn't exist back in 1940 so Smitty would be great to have running into people without concern for his brain.

Bench- Titus, Dana, Reags. Our basketball contingent. Titus has experience there (this isn't rude because I rode the bench in college too and he wrote an entire book about it so how about you pipe down) and Reags is a basketball guy so he likely hates contact. Dana did average 12 and 10 though so we could find a spot for him.

Assistant Coach- RA

If you watched the latest sandbagger you'll see that a guy roaming the sidelines guzzling booze just makes sense.

Bag Guy- Jersey Jerry

I don't know why, but in 1940 it feels like this is a required role and I can think of no one better.

Party Guy- Stu

Giphy Images.

I think in 1940 there was more focus on the celebration than training in the offseason so we need Stu. Although his size fits for 1940 football.

Head Coach - Dave

Giphy Images.

Dave coached the Barstool basketball team and we won exactly zero games so it stands to reason we just needed to put together a football team.

So there you have it, your 1940 National Champions. We would go undefeated and unscored upon while averaging 63 points per game. Simple as that.

NOTABLE OMISSIONS

KFC - Have you seen the original Barstool Draft Combine? That mess wouldn't even cut it against plumbers and electricians.

Whitney - Was he a very successful pro athlete? Yes. Was he an Olympic athlete? Yes. Would he be a great addition to the team? Yes. But I don't think Whit wants to be bothered these days with even hypothetical scenarios where he might have to hit people when he'd rather be playing golf.

Rico - Sorry, you don't get to call me a back-up and bag on my athletic career for years while you played on the equivalent of a club team in college and couldn't hold my jock. I could've started on your team when I was a sophomore in high school. Remember as Dave said, D3 football is pointless.

Dan - I don't think Dan has the stamina and he would also get us in trouble with throwing games for his bookie.

Brandon Walker - For no other reason than it will irk him to no end to be left off a hypothetical football team.

Read the original here:

Fire Up The Delorean - I Constructed A Roster Of Barstool ... - Barstool Sports

Posted in Rockall | Comments Off on Fire Up The Delorean – I Constructed A Roster Of Barstool … – Barstool Sports

How Lakeith Stanfield Soared to the Heights of Hollywood – AnOther Magazine

Posted: at 11:47 am

September 15, 2023

Lead ImageShirt in cotton and wings in brass (both worn throughout) by LOEWE. Band trousers in wool (worn throughout) by WALES BONNERPhotography by Joshua Woods, Styling by Ellie Grace Cumming

Thisprojectis taken from the Autumn/Winter 2023 issue of AnOther Magazine and wasrealised before the SAG-AFTRA strike was announced:

Its two hours past call time andLaKeith Stanfieldstill hasnt shown up for the cover shoot. His absence has engendered a slightly anxious mood on set. Walkie-talkies crackle. The crew paces back and forth under the hot sun. Rattlesnakes forage in the dry chaparral. Everyone seems a little on edgeand, geographically speaking, they are. From 2,000 feet aboveMalibu, perched at the summit of the dry hill-scape, the sky out over the city blends seamlessly with the Pacific Ocean, to the point where its difficult to tell one from the other in the vast expanse of blue. There is the sense that youve arrived at the worlds outer limit or at least the end of California. It doesnt seem irrational to wonder if, by now, Stanfield has grown tired of the weathering demands of celebrity: the endless procession of reporters, the fans interrupting dinners withweed offerings or impressions of his characters, the ambient expectation that he should always be available to entertain.

The truth is that Stanfield hasnt been outside the publics sphere of attention since he found his way into it ten years ago, as a 21-year-old off-the-radar newcomer from San Bernardino,California, who didnt own a cell phone and had been most recently employed at a weed grow house. His first role wasthat of an emotionally volatile kid about to age out of a grouphome for at-risk teens, in a thesis film-turned-small budgetfeature calledShort Term 12. Theories abound that the movieis charmed; its lead actors Rami Malek and Brie Larson are big names now. But it was Stanfield, playing Marcus, who left the most lasting impression. He dissolves into his characters;sometimes it seems more like hes transcribing his own moods than reciting lines. The wounded sensitivity he brought to therole was so internalised that, when Marcus burst into tears after shaving his head and finding no scars left over from his mothers abuse, Larson had to excuse myself from the scene and cry. The breakdown hadnt been in the script.

Back at the motorhome at the base of the hill, Stanfield is dressed as himself, in a pale green knitted polo, black jeans, a black baseball cap and socked feet slipped into Birkenstocks. Thick, arcane symbols are tattooed along his hands and arms like doodles scrawled into a high school notebook. Hes stretched out on a couch that lines the back wall, his posture easy and relaxed. Its hard to say whether the four hours of shooting under the hot California sun has drained his sociability, because there is a perpetual air of almost monastic tranquillity about him, a natural orientation that could easily be misattributed to the composure of perma-friedness. He denies my offer of Reeses Pieces in favour of a transparent container filled with large slices of dried mango, which he picks at while we talk. Poisoning yourself makes you do things you dont want to, he says in response to a question about spirituality, which sounds more like the reasoning behind his sobriety. You start to become the things you ingest, so you want to stay away from things that can damage your body.

Stanfield is currently on double-promotion duty for films that could not seem more distinct (this interview took place before Sag-Aftra announced strikes on 14 July 2023): a Disney remake of 2003s The Haunted Mansion, in which he plays an expert hired to evacuate ghosts from a decrepit property, and Jeymes Samuels enigmatic The Book of Clarence, which is due out in January. What is known about the latter is as follows: (1) it takes place in 29 AD Jerusalem, but was filmed in Matera, the same southern Italian town where Pasolini shot The Gospel According to St Matthew; (2) Stanfield plays the titular cult leader, who is looking to capitalise on the rise of celebrity and influence the Messiah for his own personal gain; and (3) camels shit so frequently and profusely that there were workers whose sole job on set was to clean up after them. Peace to all the gods that allow these people to be so great at what they do, Stanfield says. But, like, bless them. I know thats a stinky job.

I always wanted to be the centre of attention LaKeith Stanfield

Stanfield previously worked with Samuel on 2021s The Harder They Fall, a high-octane, orgiastic bloodbath of a film that everyone called revisionist because it inserted Black people into the western epic tradition never mind that the whole master narrative of John Wayne types as the heroes of the Old West is itself a romantic construct. Samuels film instead took up a playful, winking disinterest in the trappings of historical accuracy. He laundered the real stories of 19th-century Black cowboys through his Blaxploitation-conscious sensibility, and metaphorically killed Tarantino when he shot the first white person who fixed their mouth to say the n-word. He intentionally undermined the time period with an anachronistic soundtrack, smuggling Jay-Z, Lauryn Hill and Barrington Levy into the 1870s. Jeymes just knows how to create these special environments that are unlike any other film sets youve ever been on, he says of the director. You go on his sets and there are these giant speakers playing music, and everybodys dancing and its like a party. Its all these Black people, and were all having organic fun. And so, when we get on screen, that transition is seamless. The fun you see is real.

It seems like hes having a blast in The Harder They Fall. In a cast of otherwise serious, quick-tempered characters, Stanfields interpretation of Cherokee Bill (whose infamous last words before he was hanged were, I came here to die, not make a speech) is calm, reluctant, humorous. He doesnt want to use violence. Hes an outlaw with a bountiful kill record who seems bored by his lack of competition, an arrogant, western One-Punch Man with a haunted stare and perfect comic timing. Its often Stanfields comic instincts his eccentricity, his unsettled physicality, his nonchalant delivery of utterly absurd lines that make him a reliable scene-stealer, alternately magnetic and memorable even among an ensemble cast of seasoned performers. That In Living Color and Saturday Night Live were his favourite programmes growing up tracks. Consider, for example, an unscripted moment from Atlanta, when his character, Darius, is cleaning his gun and lovingly refers to it (him?) as Daddy. You call your gun Daddy? says Paper Boi, hilariously played by Brian Tyree Henry. Thats weird, man. They go back and forth like this, bantering over the sexual implications of the word before Darius pauses, then suggests, softly: You not gonna see this, but your assumed perversion of the word Daddy? I think thats stemming from the fear of mortality, man. What?

Stanfield had odd dreams while he was away filming Clarence in Matera, dreams where he was trapped in a stone dimension not unlike the dark, yawning grottos scooped out of the calcareous rock all over the prehistoric city. He describes feeling isolated while he was there, a condition exacerbated by personal issues he alludes to but does not elaborate on. Sometimes youll get these roles and theyll mirror you, or youll mirror them, and it feels like youre literally going through the same thing, he says. I was going through some hard stuff while I was filming, and I would often ask myself, like, What would Clarence do? It was really strange. Ive never really done that with a character. Whether or not a cult leader would make for a trustworthy spiritual guide remains inconclusive.

Stanfield was raised in Riverside, near San Bernardino, and later in Victorville, out in the Mojave Desert. He came of age in a barren landscape known mostly as a set piece for Lethal Weapon and Kill Bill: Volume II, but also for the nickname it was graced with by the people who live there: Victimville. The seventh top employer when Stanfield lived there was the Victorville Federal Correctional Complex, a dark mass of grey watchtowers, double electric fences and squat concrete buildings spread out over 1.2 million square feet of the Mojave.

Its unclear whether the nickname Victimville was intended to reference the 4,000 inmates housed in those prisons or to describe the culture of violence and poverty in the region. Stanfield occasionally got into trouble while living there, got in fist fights over girls or stole sandwiches and bottles of beer and got Tasered for smoking weed and learnt the hard way or so he told Complex magazine in 2016 that you cant really outrun a helicopter. But on the whole, his life in Victorville was far less violent than it had been in Riverside, where he sometimes witnessed his mothers boyfriend beating her up. And so he decided that it was a kind of haven. It was sleepy. Not much to do.

The boredom forced his imagination. I always wanted to be the centre of attention, Stanfield says. He was the designated entertainer of the family, the one who would stage sock puppet shows and feign accents at gatherings, who would slip into his aunts church wigs and then dance around the living room, pretending to be someone else. His bedroom walls were papered with sketches, poems and symbols, and there was a makeshift recording booth made from egg cartons. He watched Love Jones, Menace II Society, Boyz n the Hood, Brown Sugar then wandered the flat desert plains and allowed his mind to compose its own characters, with their own specific micro-dramas. I was completely apathetic towards school, he says, and he flunked nearly every class except for drama. When he was 15, he started googling any terms he could think of related to acting and signed up to whatever materialised online and sent off his information to random email addresses in the hopes of landing an audition.

I think there has just been a fire lit under me ever since the opportunity to be a performer first arrived in front of me. And I havent looked back. I have to take advantage of every opportunity I get so that I can continue to do this work. So Im always going to throw everything at it. My ambition hasnt waned LaKeith Stanfield

The first response he got wasnt for a part in a play or film, but for a slot at a school called the John Casablancas Modeling & Career Center, which was founded by the same man who launched Elite Models and cost $5,000 to attend sessions for. Eventually he landed the Short Term 12 role and though Destin Daniel Crettons short premiered in 2009 at Sundance and won a jury award, nothing really came after that. Stanfields inbox stayed empty and nobody came knocking at his door. He moved to Sacramento to develop a relationship with his father and worked as a lawn mower, a door-to-door salesman for AT&T and a weed salesman at a grow house. The day he was fired from the AT&T job for childhood run-ins with the law he checked his inbox and found five consecutive emails from Cretton, who said he was adapting the short into a feature and was hoping Stanfield would audition to reprise his role. (He was the only cast member carried over from the short and ended up with a best supporting actor nomination at 2014s Independent Spirit Awards, as well as a nod from the Satellite Awards for a rap song he wrote with the director.)

In 2014 alone, the year after Short Term 12 came out, Stanfield appeared in Selma and The Purge: Anarchy, two big-budget studio movies that were smashes at the box office. The following year, he had credits in seven films. He released experimental rap songs as part of a band and, on his own, appeared in music videos for Run the Jewels and Jay-Z, danced drunk at a party, as if he was the only one in the room, and was hired on the spot to play Darius in Atlanta. He had all of two scenes in Get Out and nobody forgot them. He worked, and worked some more, and somehow managed to eke out a place for himself in Hollywood that doesnt require a series of bargains and compromises, which gives him the latitude to play an unusual set of characters who reflect the expansiveness he sees in his own humanity. When I ask him why he works so often, what might happen if he finally decides to be still on top of Clarence and Haunted Mansion, hes also starring in a new Apple TV+ series called The Changeling he pauses.

I think there has just been a fire lit under me ever since the opportunity to be a performer first arrived in front of me, he says. And I havent looked back. I have to take advantage of every opportunity I get so that I can continue to do this work. So Im always going to throw everything at it. My ambition hasnt waned. He has always understood that the line between having and not having is tenuous.

Its really hard, maybe even impossible to maintain a perfect centre all the time, Stanfield says. Ive just finished telling him a story about my aunt, a stage actress known as the first lady of Jamaican theatre, who would sometimes, in my mothers words, bring her characters home with her. How she would come home attended by a shroud of misery, moving through the house as though behind a veil of cellophane. It seems to resonate. Stanfield makes himself blank when accommodating a new character, and then excavates from his own old wounds and past experiences to fill out the psychic space. The goal is to achieve a state where one is not performing so much as being. His characters become portals through which he can explore the inner lives of other people and also a mirror within which he can more clearly evaluate himself. If youre paying attention, and if youre lucky enough to come across a role that was written well, youll typically learn something about yourself or a version of life you havent had, he says. And those can be positive lessons. Or not. It doesnt always feel good.

Stanfield doesnt call it method, but his immersion can still be destabilising. Anecdotes that could pass for mythology proliferate around his craft, his intensity, his dedication to the role; Hollywood loves a martyr, the high drama of suffering transmuted into art. For his scene in Selma when Jimmie Lee Jackson is beaten and shot to death by state troopers, Stanfield ran laps around the set so he would lose consciousness as the cameras started rolling, his eyes fluttering shut and his body shutting down. In Short Term 12, when his character whacks another boy with a wiffle-ball bat, the rage felt so real to Stanfield that he actually struck the other kid, whose father ran out to chastise him with a reminder that hes supposed to be acting. And after wrapping Uncut Gems, Adam Sandler told its co-director Josh Safdie that the only other actor hed ever seen get that deeply into character was Dustin Hoffman, who infamously antagonised Meryl Streep on the set of Kramer vs Kramer by slapping her across the face and taunting her with remarks about her recently dead boyfriend.

Of all the roles hes played, something about Stanfields performance in Judas and the Black Messiah is outstanding moving, sends shivers down the spine. He plays William ONeal, the FBI informant who infiltrated the Black Panther Party in the late 1960s and provided the floor plan of Fred Hamptons apartment that facilitated his assassination. For his part, ONeal is a haunted, tragic figure; even after drugging Hampton the night before his murder, he begged the family to let him be a pallbearer at the funeral. Stanfield plays it all with a simmering neuroticism, every movement animated by an uncertain twitchiness, every spell of laughter reaching for a hysterical pitch. In the moments when the room is dense with fraternity and affection, we see him quietly tortured by the scale of his own betrayal, his posture suddenly resigned, his eyes tearful and dark, the weight of this double consciousness seizing his faculties. The only documents that Stanfield had to consult were court transcripts and a PBS documentary from 1990 called Eyes on the Prize II, in which ONeals delusions are on uncomfortable display: he claims that at least nobody can call him an armchair revolutionary because he was actually part of the struggle. He killed himself the night the documentary aired, ran out onto Chicagos Eisenhower Expressway and had his body crushed by traffic.

Youre playing with your psyche, as an actor. Thats something that is sensitive. And if youre a performer, chances are youre sensitive, like me. So you have to be careful about some of the places you go. I learnt that the hard way LaKeith Stanfield

Stanfield was haunted by the part. He had panic attacks on set that sent him scurrying out of trailers and into the open air. Alopecia that had been in remission returned, inexplicably. His hands would shake, then go numb. He couldnt straighten out the ethics of bringing sensitivity and understanding to a man who had acted with such murderous self-interest, whose entire system of morality seemed at odds with Stanfields own. And a scene when he drugs Hampton, which didnt make it to the final cut, felt somehow real to him. His body couldnt differentiate between the role and the reality something his co-star Dominique Fishback had warned him of. I didnt know what was going on at the time, but I guess I was putting myself under a lot of stress, he says. There arent really too many apparatuses in place to help artists deal with the aftermath after putting their all into these things. So you have to take the responsibility upon yourself to try to figure out what that means. And since Im not super-religious, I had to find a way to help me in those moments.

He ended up in therapy, which has since become a spiritual parachute that keeps him from going too far. You have to be aware of how the things that youre downloading affect you, Stanfield says, because you can sometimes go to places that, if you arent careful, can be hard to navigate and come back from. Youre playing with your psyche, as an actor. Thats something that is sensitive. And if youre a performer, chances are youre sensitive, like me. So you have to be careful about some of the places you go. I learnt that the hard way.

LaKeith Stanfield is Showing Hollywood How to be Weird. Or is the Greatest Weird Actor of Our Generation. LaKeithStanfield is Reframing Black masculinity, Redefining Blackmasculinity, Revolutionising Black masculinity or anyway, hes doing something that involves Blackness, weirdness, masculinity and Hollywood. The way critics write abouthow Stanfield fits into the tapestry of Hollywoods leading men tends to focus on the perceived strangeness of the parts he chooses, how hes presenting a contemporary vision of Black manhood that (some) people arent accustomed to seeing. The idea, however myopic, is that our Black movie stars are always possessed of an impenetrable cool, an easy-going charisma shared by Denzel Washington, Morgan Freeman,Samuel L Jackson, Sidney Poitier. Stanfield gravitates towards characters who could scarcely be described as cool. His men are offbeat, tense, unsure. Anxiety is common. And its clear he identifies with them in some capacity. Its why he picks them.

But he doesnt recognise himself in that sociological way that critics write about him. Probably its annoying to have a bunch of journalists, often white, repeatedly call you weird. Theres a way that people tend to conflate Stanfield with his roles, assuming theres no significant distance between LaKeith Stanfield the person and, for example, Darius the character. This seems at least partially merited. Much of what Darius says on Atlanta, like the gun thing, is improvised. And, like Darius, Stanfield prefers a freewheeling conversation style involving unbroken eye contact and the occasional meditative, slightly off-kilter digression. After five series of the show, Darius is the part people most associate him with. Its been a long run with theAtlantaboys, and Im so grateful to have been part of that, he says, noting theyve wrapped filming on the final season. It was cool to play this character who sticks with so many people, someone they resonate with and who feels like a real person to them. So many people run up to me acting real goofy because they think Im Darius.

It could also be that he doesnt seem to take fame particularly seriously. There was a time when he was suspended from Twitter for impersonating other celebrities, from Offset, MoNique and Jack Black to Cardi B and Donald Trump. In 2018, having already acted in enough films to be considered famous, he posted his real phone number online. He showed up to interviews on his press tour forDeath Noteas his eccentric detective character, L, crouching in chairs andsaying things to reporters like, Shoes have soles. Humans havespirits. He has crashed awards ceremonies with acceptance speeches for TV shows he never worked on, worn a Kamala Harris-inspired wig on a livestream just after the vice-presidential debate, randomly pulled out accents to confuse reporters at press junkets.

Im wondering how one reconciles a profound desire for attention with the concomitant need for privacy. Stanfield says hes still working it out, how to be in the movies and the magazines while keeping whats sacred to him sacred. It still baffles him the way people project certain moral and politicalresponsibilities onto actors and musicians, how whatever theysay is taken as gospel. It seems to me hes been finding different ways to describe fame as unnatural or unhealthy, but he argues that celebrity isnt necessarily a bad thing. When his publicists file into the motorhome, right on schedule, wevebeen caught in an exchange about fame and religion, Stanfieldon a digression about the cult of attention.

I think people tend to value who theythinkhave value, and people who are popular seem to have that because everyones paying attention to them, he says. But placing all your faith in the human wouldnt be the wise thing to do. Sometimes I think theres too much importance placed on celebrity, and people think celebrities cant make mistakes or cant be wrong. Which is weird. Especially when anyone can be famous now, for doing anything at all.

Grooming: Sian Richards using concealer and skincare by SIAN RICHARDS LONDON and Bed Head by TIGI. Make-up: Frankie Boyd at Streeters using DANESSA MYRICKS BEAUTY. Set design: Patience Harding at New School. Photographic assistants: Bummy Koepenick, Todd Weaver and Cory Hackbarth. Styling assistants: Bella Kavanagh, Raphael Del Bono, Elliot Soriano and Gemma Valdes Joffroy. Make-up assistant: Megumi Asai. Set-design assistants: James Beyer, Mia Brito and Bradford Schroeder. Research: Daniel Obaweya. Printing: Sarah England. Production: Connect the Dots. Post-production: Ink

This story features in the Autumn/Winter 2023 issue of AnOther Magazine, which is on sale now. Order here.

Read the original post:

How Lakeith Stanfield Soared to the Heights of Hollywood - AnOther Magazine

Posted in Rockall | Comments Off on How Lakeith Stanfield Soared to the Heights of Hollywood – AnOther Magazine

Our islands are living communities you are in them, not on – The National

Posted: at 11:47 am

It drives me absolutely crackers. Would you say that you were on Edinburgh? On Leith?

Unless you are sunshine, then no, you absolutely would not. Ah but, they say, you are talking about islands. They are standalone objects. I might take that point but, would you say on the UK?

Why not? Oh, because it is a place. Made up of many entities. Too many things of importance exist for us to say on. On would reduce it to no more than a rock. Of course we wouldnt do that.

So why do we refer to our island communities that way? On Harris, on Tiree, on Skye.

That grammatical tic is everywhere you look, and Im proposing that it shouldnt be. You should never be on a populated island. You should be in these places. These are communities of living, breathing people. They are stuffed with histories and stories. They are not rocks nor artefacts you just gaze at. When you write about them, you should use in.

Its not hard. The difference is easy to grasp. It is the difference between a geographical feature and a town, village, community or place in which there is or has been habitation.

You can be on a rock. Lets say you are on Rockall. Assuming you dont believe in the human rights of a weather station, it is an uninhabited geographical feature which has never been home to people. (Those with a death wish and a brass neck dont count.) So, be on it until you are blue in whichever extremity you choose.

You can be on a hill, on a mountain. You can even be on an island if the context is geographical. You could technically be on the island of Mull. But you should always be in Mull, the place.

Isle of, is tricker. It can, so to speak, swing both ways. But I can be as pedantic as any online commenter; their red pen quivering in their clenched fist. So I make a point of always saying in the Isle of. Its entirely deliberate. I have even written it into funding applications as an impact I want to achieve from projects to get more people saying in in the context of islands because to me, it acknowledges the communities of people.

I pushthe point because I firmly believe that when a living place becomes something you are on, or even worse, at, that place becomes an object. It is reduced to a mere commodity. And that is not how our islands should be seen. It is not how anyones home should be seen.

You can be at a theme park or a museum. You should never be at a town, or a village. Be at a beach, but not at Tobermory or at Stornoway. We have Zuckerberg to thank for that one. Rather than putting the effort into making the algorithm differentiate between on or in, he presumably settled on at during that period of social media hell where we announced our location on a per-second basis. Why? Because it was easier.

And we all started doing it. At, on. It is indeed easy. It requires no thought. And therein lies the issue.

When you are in the islands (see what I did there) there is a temptation, driven by an industry focused mainly on the view, to see them as adorable, quaint little objects where time stands still. Some people even claim to go back in time as soon as they set foot in them!

The scenery is the goal. Fewer and fewer who visit get under the skin of these places or make an effort to understand what makes them actually tick. Our homes become little more than a checkbox in an I-Spy book. Have you done Skye? Im doing Shetland next summer.

Being in a place requires some mental and emotional work. If only to acknowledge the people past and present who made it their home.

To some it might seem over the top, it might even seem petty. But to those of us for whom it matters, it is neither.

For those of us with Gaelic on our lips, you are always in. Ann an Tiriodh, ann am Muile. You would never hear on used in Gaelic about a living place. On is not grammatically possible, unless it is a rock, or a skerry or something forever uninhabited. In Gaelic, we still use in for St Kilda in recognition of those who were once there.

And thats when the knife cuts that little bit deeper and sharper because once upon a time the debate would not have been had. And most certainly not in English.

Link:

Our islands are living communities you are in them, not on - The National

Posted in Rockall | Comments Off on Our islands are living communities you are in them, not on – The National

10 Harsh Realities About Bret Hart His Fans Need To Realize – TheSportster

Posted: at 11:47 am

The legendary career of Bret Hart saw him prime coming nearly three decades ago with noteworthy stints in WWE and WCW. Any wrestler to have a run as relevant as Bret in the public eye will end up seeing their fans having some harsh realities involved in their careers. No one has a perfect stint in wrestling with all good matches and great programs.

RELATED: 10 Wrestlers Bret Hart Successfully Got Over

However, Hart is on the short list of all-time respected names that will get treated with full appreciation from the wrestling community. That makes it harder to pinpoint his lower moments of what could have been different. Each of the following memories from Brets career will look in depth at some harsh realities from his career.

Bret Harts promo skills are among the rare weaknesses of his career when looking back. There were times when Bret cut great promos if the context of a feud or character made sense, but he wasnt as colorful or charismatic as most other wrestlers on his tier.

RELATED: 5 Best Opponents Of Bret Hart's Wrestling Career (& 5 Worst)

A wrestler as iconic is Hart has a tougher scale since hes on the short list of Mount Rushmore worthy talents. Names like Hulk Hogan, Steve Austin and The Rock all cut much better promos one for one. Even recent years of John Cena, CM Punk and Roman Reigns sees the top stars having stronger talking skills than Bret.

WWE booked the feud between Bret Hart and Bob Backlund to showcase a former WWE Champion from over a decade ago trying to challenge the new top dog. Backlund beating Bret to win the title came due to Owen Hart manipulating the Hart parents to throw in a towel.

Even with the story protecting Bret, the idea of him losing the title to Backlund should have been stopped from day one. Backlund didnt feel like a credible top star in 1994 and dropped the belt to Diesel days later. Hart suffered embarrassment from the worst possible name ending his title run.

WCW made Starrcade their biggest annual event for the companys entire history. Every WCW talent hoped to have a main event level match on that event in the same manner that WWE talents treated and still treat WrestleMania like the highest honor.

Bret Hart surprisingly was in arguably the worst Starrcade main event ever in 1999 against Goldberg when WCW did a horrible Montreal Screwjob recreation finish. Other matches like Hulk Hogan vs The Butcher, Hulk Hogan vs Roddy Piper and Sid Vicious vs Scott Steiner should be in the conversation, but Hart vs Goldberg is a strong contender.

WWE fell into the habit of always wanting a popular authority figure character as part of the show for many years. Bret Hart was placed into the Raw General Manager role after his return to WWE in 2010 saw fans loving it and wanting to see more of him.

Unfortunately, a babyface authority figure always has a harder path, and Hart didnt feel too important compared to past names. Bret felt more like a figurehead that appeared to get a good pop every week. Nexus attacking Hart ended the Raw GM stint in lackluster fashion.

Bret Hart thrived most due to the realism he presented himself as representing when holding the WWE Championship. However, not even Brets credibility could make some of the hokey storylines from the New Generation Era.

Vince McMahon booked hokey characters and storylines during this time thinking it was the best way to tell stories. Harts feud with Jerry Lawler turned into both men wanting the other to kiss their feet for humiliation. Kane playing an evil dentist or Jean-Pierre LaFitte stealing Brets jacket were some of the stories Hart had to overcome.

The first-ever WWE Iron Man match between Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels may be the polarizing match in wrestling history today. Fans of 1996 loved it when seeing Michaels and Hart have an hour-long match in the main event of WrestleMania 12.

RELATED: 5 Ways Bret Hart & Shawn Michaels Are Similar (& 5 Ways They're Different)

Fans today have a hard time watching the slow and long match back since a criticism is that a large percentage of that match was rest hold based. Future Iron Man matches like The Rock vs Triple H, Brock Lesnar vs Kurt Angle, and the recent Bryan Danielson vs MJF outing from 2023 all showed that more exciting action can come with the format.

WWE benefited immensely from Bret Hart returning to the company in 2010 after a long time away following the Montreal Screwjob. Hart agreed to even wrestle a match at WrestleMania 26 to give his in-ring career some closure when facing Vince McMahon.

The idea of paying off this long history of tension by having Bret beat McMahon was great on paper, but it should have been a quick match five minutes or less given Harts limitations. WWE booked the match to go about twelve minutes with Bret hitting Vince with a chair for most of the time.

Both Sting and Bret Hart using variations of the same finishing move with the scorpion death lock and sharpshooter made this a dream feud fans wanted to see. WCW somehow fumbled the bag by having a terrible program based more about the New World Order civil war than these two wrestlers.

Halloween Havoc 1998 featured one of the worst matches of Brets career with WCWs creative ruining a nearly flawless concept on paper. Another match at Mayhem 1999 failed to live up to expectations as these two barely did anything of note when working against each other.

It has become a joke of sorts that Bret Hart hates everyone and everything about wrestling today since he doesnt hide his opinions when asked. That criticism isnt fully fair as Bret also goes out of his way to praise names that he enjoys watching.

The valid knock against Hart is that he gets too personal and makes some deeply insulting comments. Seth Rollins talked about Bret knocking his safety as a worker as being a low point of his career. Even old enemies like Goldberg get hit with a handful of insults from Hart per year after trying to make peace.

Shawn Michaels and Bret Hart are friends today, but their fans still have the online debates about which was the better wrestler. Anyone saying Bret was the better overall performer has a fair argument until their career accomplishments are compared.

Michaels having a longer run and a deeper library of all-time great matches puts him above Hart. It isnt fully fair to use Brets shortened career against him since he was forced to retire after WCW. However, any all-time great debate will lead to scenarios like this unfolding with longevity as part of the equation.

The rest is here:

10 Harsh Realities About Bret Hart His Fans Need To Realize - TheSportster

Posted in Rockall | Comments Off on 10 Harsh Realities About Bret Hart His Fans Need To Realize – TheSportster

Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release Whiskies – Quill & Pad

Posted: at 11:47 am

There is little point in reciting the history and details of each of the distilleries involved in this latest Release not least because it would make this piece the size of a book. May I suggest Dave Brooms superb A Sense of Place, aptly described as a journey around Scotlands whisky. A must-have book for whisky lovers.

The whiskies for 2022, in no particular order. I have given scores as an indication of my thoughts of the whiskies, but I would happily drink any of these. A superb collection and preferences at this level will come down to your personal likes and dislikes. I adore those peaty, smoky notes from a great Islay, for example, but I have friends who cannot bear them. Australian prices for those buying individual bottles

Oban 10yo, 57.1%. $180. From the Highlands, this was matured first in refill and new American oak, before being finished in Amontillado-seasoned casks.

Oban 10 Year Old Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release 2022 whisky

A pale straw color, notes of flint, peaches, matchsticks and campfires. A hint of nougat. There is excellent length and power here. That old saying about whisky being fire and ice well, this one brings the fire. The most fearsome of the Collection. If the rip-roaring style is your thing, youll adore this. The team describes it as a great dram for the hip flask when out on the hills, or by the campfire at night. Could not agree more. 93.

Clynelish 12yo, 58.5%. $350. Another Highlands whisky, it was matured in refill American oak, then finished in Pedro Ximenez and Oloroso-seasoned casks.

Clynelish 12 Year Old Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release 2022 whisky

Yellow gold hue. There are gentle florals here and hints of hand-rolled cigars. A touch of white pepper. Fragrant with those floral notes and spices. A hint of vanilla. This is immaculately balanced and with a lovely lingering finish. A malt note is ever-present and there is an underlying sweetness. A warm and comforting style. Mid-winter, a glass of this next to a roaring fire would be magic. 94.

Talisker 11yo, 55.1%. $199. Again, from the Highlands, this was matured in and blended from a mix of first-fill ex-bourbon casks, refill casks and what are described as wine-seasoned casks.

Talisker 11 Year Old Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release 2022 whisky

A famous distillery, while this whisky might not be made in the usual standards mode, it is impossible to escape that peat and iodine note. A pale bronze color, love the nose. As well as gentle peat and smoke notes, we have orange rinds, cinnamon, nutmeg and mandarin. There is leather and a lovely saline touch as well. Even some gentle tropical touches start to intrude on the palate, which is supple, perhaps surprisingly powerful, and very long. 93.

Glen Ord 15yo, 54.2%. $205. Another Highlands whisky, which is actually labeled as The Singleton, this was matured in refill American and European oak, then finished in old wine casks.

The Singleton Glen Ord 15 Year Old Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release 2022 whisky

Deep bronze, there is a mellowness to this which makes it immediately appealing. Stonefruit, peaches, biscuity notes, a palate that is supple and seductive with notes of oranges, white chocolate and mandarins. A soft sweetness which is finely balanced. Impressive length and a structure that gives the whisky some formality. Good complexity throughout. The longer this is in the glass, the more that emerges. 94.

Lagavulin 12yo, 57.3%. $230. From Islay, a famous name if ever there was one. This whisky is matured in and then blended from a mix of refill and virgin oak casks. Both are American oak.

Lagavulin 12 Year Old Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release 2022 whisky

Pale gold. There is a warmth here, that edges out from under the classic notes of smoke and peat. Citrus, stonefruit, woodsmoke, ginger, iodine and lemongrass, though they play a secondary role to that gorgeous peat. A dense texture with richness and power. Hints of white chocolate emerged on the palate. A fine example for the uninitiated to decide whether they like that traditional Islay smoke/peat or not. I most certainly do. 93.

Cardhu 16yo, 58%. $299. From Speyside, this whisky is matured in re-fill and re-charred American oak before being finished in Jamaican pot still rum-seasoned casks.

Cardhu 16 Year Old Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release 2022 whisky

A pale yellow with a tinge of green. The nose exhibits spicy notes with saline and oystershell characters. Herbs, ginger, lemon grass, orange rinds and a minerally backing. A character not unlike a vanilla lemon slice. Notes of campfires and matchsticks. This is of moderate length with the flavors very much upfront. For me, thoroughly enjoyable, but it would have been a smidge more impressive with extra length and focus. 90.

Originally posted here:

Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release Whiskies - Quill & Pad

Posted in Rockall | Comments Off on Diageo Elusive Expressions Special Release Whiskies – Quill & Pad

Ports and truckers clash over post-Brexit border costs – Financial Times

Posted: at 11:47 am

What is included in my trial?

During your trial you will have complete digital access to FT.com with everything in both of our Standard Digital and Premium Digital packages.

Standard Digital includes access to a wealth of global news, analysis and expert opinion. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital, click here.

Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section.

If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for $69 per month.

For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the Settings & Account section. If youd like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial.

You may also opt to downgrade to Standard Digital, a robust journalistic offering that fulfils many users needs. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here.

Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel.

You may change or cancel your subscription or trial at any time online. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side.

You can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current billing period.

We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments.

Visit link:

Ports and truckers clash over post-Brexit border costs - Financial Times

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on Ports and truckers clash over post-Brexit border costs – Financial Times

What would the UK look like without Brexit? – The New Statesman

Posted: at 11:47 am

Picture the scene. Economic growth is 5 per cent higher in the UK than it is now, foreign investment is up 11 per cent, and 7 per cent more goods are being traded across its borders. Stick on Ode to Joy, pop open a bottle of prosecco, curl off some jamn: welcome to Doppelgnger Britain.

This parallel universe scoffed at by Brexiteers and yearned for by Europhiles is the unofficial comparison point for how much Brexit has impacted the UK economy. The country the UK could have been had it remained in the European Union. Its a world that hovers in and out of view from Brexit Britain, like one of those lenticular stickers from the Nineties. There, but not there a vision just out of view behind every unsettling ripple in the stagnant economy.

Inflation, product scarcity, staff shortages, queues at Dover whatever it is, the question is always is this Brexit? Remainers are certain it is, sore-winner Brexiteers wont hear anything of it (though are similarly silent on their projects promised merits). Opinion polls suggest a country filled with Bregret.

The doppelgnger is an attempt to work out how the UK would be faring now if it werent for Brexit. Referenced in the Financial Times, Economist and BBC, weighing on the shoulders of Whitehall civil servants, and pored over by European governments, the doppelgnger model is perhaps the most influential analysis we have of Brexits impact. And it doesnt look good.

In creating a mythical Britain from comparable economies around the world as they were before the 2016 EU referendum this method suggests some of the bleakest pre-Brexit forecasts were right. Late last year, the model found that Brexit has reduced UK GDP by 5.5 per cent. (Since GDP growth forecasts were revised upwards last month, this has fallen to 5 per cent.) In 2018, the governments long-term Brexit forecast suggested the deal Boris Johnson backed would make the UK 4.9 per cent worse off. The Office for Budget Responsibility found Brexit would reduce productivity by 4 per cent in the long run.

Select and enter your email address

Your email address

[See also: Labour is getting bolder on Brexit]

Not quite Project Fear the label applied to Remainers who warned the UK would suffer an immediate recession. But nowhere near a nimble Singapore-on-Thames nor a buccaneering Global Britain either.

The model suggests the costs of Brexit are on the higher end of the forecasts made before and immediately after the referendum, said John Springford, the economist behind the model. He is deputy director of the Centre for European Reform, a pro-European think tank, where he began as a junior research fellow in 2011 focused on what was then considered boring stuff about the EU.

Growing up in the small Dorset town of Sturminster Newton, Springford went on to a degree in economic history at Glasgow University. He joined the think tank world after abandoning a PhD at Oxford (I hated it). While he was politically engaged, he only became interested in the EU at university.

Since 2004 with the accession [of ten eastern European member states], the euro crisis, the migration crisis, a lot of the news has been bad, he reflected. Before, it was just something people didnt think about. It was part of the plumbing. Then there were some things which people started not to like, and the benefits were diffuse and inchoate.

In 2018, he began building the doppelgnger. Using data from the first quarter of 2009 up to the 2016 referendum, Springford pulled together a weighted combination of advanced economies on a similar trajectory to the UK, to create a hypothetical British economy that stayed in the EU. He ran his model from 2018, making the code public so that he could tweak it through feedback.

A major criticism was from the free-market economists Julian Jessop and Graham Gudgin, who argued that the model could not untangle the impact of Brexit from other factors, such as Covid-19 or the fiscal policies of individual states (for example, Donald Trumps tax cuts in the US). In response, Springford reduced the weight of any individual country in the model. He also suspended it temporarily when the pandemic hit to avoid the wild fluctuations in growth measurements across the world. The liberal economist Jonathan Portes has also critiqued the doppelgnger, pointing out that while it demonstrates a fall in UK growth, it cannot show the reasons why. He believes the negative impact of Brexit on UK GDP is more likely to be around 2-3 per cent.

Springford stopped running his model altogether earlier this year. The further you get away from 2016, the more shocks that come along that affect countries differently. In the end, the energy-price shock killed the model, he said.

Brexits tremors continue to rattle the country. In August, for the fifth time the UK government delayed imposing post-Brexit import checks on food and fresh produce from the EU. Yet again, this gives continental food producers an advantage, as all fresh food exports from the UK to the bloc do have to undergo checks.

With his tortoiseshell glasses, ginger beard and scuffed brown shoes, Springford, 44, looked every bit the unassuming academic when we met on a park bench in Victoria Tower Gardens, beside the Houses of Parliament. Yet he or at least the counterfactual country he founded has become a lightning rod of the lingering Brexit debate. Denounced as fearmongering and an absurd Remainiac report by Jacob Rees-Mogg last December in an Express column, and even questioned in the House of Lords by another prominent Tory Brexiteer, David Frost.

Springfords model last reported in summer 2022 that UK GDP is 5.5 per cent lower than that of the doppelgnger, investment 11 per cent lower, goods trade 7 per cent lower, and services trade about equal. When we met, however, Springford painted an even gloomier picture after revisions of the goods trade figures, he believes the hit was more likely one of 10-15 per cent. Inflation, too, has been exacerbated by Brexit, he argued, referring to LSE research showing Brexit was behind significant rises in food prices. Brexits restrictions on low-skilled EU immigration must have had an impact on inflation too, he added.

While UK services trade has held up, even emerging as better than the doppelgnger in some early findings, Springford nevertheless argues Brexits impact is definitely negative the argument is about how negative. He is particularly concerned about flatlining investment.

Were going to see further costs of Brexit down the road: this is not the end of it.

Without investment in new equipment, you cant get productivity growth computers deteriorate, machinery starts breaking down, youre not getting the latest technology, he warned. Thats continuing, and thats really concerning. Without that starting to rise, were going to see further costs of Brexit down the road; this is not the end of it.

Springford is asked all the time by European governments and diplomats particularly in western European and Nordic countries to visit and talk them through his work. He believes its helpful to those with growing populist movements. Its been pretty effective. If you look at Giorgia Meloni in Italy, Marine Le Pen in France, theyve all dialled back the Euroscepticism.

Yet closer to home, he has less of a hearing. Neither the Conservatives nor Labour have engaged significantly with his work something he regrets. I understand it tactically, he said. But after the election, Labour cant just say were going to improve the deal when theyve essentially been saying that Brexit is done and theres no compelling case for a much closer relationship. Part of that case has to be the impact of Brexit on the economy, and the groundwork isnt being laid we need to try and reduce these costs.

[See also: Are you happy outside the tennis club? Sadiq Khan on rejoining the EU]

Continue reading here:

What would the UK look like without Brexit? - The New Statesman

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on What would the UK look like without Brexit? – The New Statesman

The long road of Brexit: A shifting regulatory reality – New Food

Posted: at 11:47 am

Shane Brennan, Chief Executive of the Cold Chain Federation discusses how numerous Brexit import pushbacks have affected the sector and what the supply chain might look like in a post-Brexit world.

The UK has left the EU. I hope that doesnt come as a surprise to anyone, but it might for some especially in the European food business community. Because, for all the political drama of recent years, very little has changed for European food companies that are used to selling food to the UK.

For them, and for their customers, Brexit is still to be done and therefore the implications of import controls are yet to play out. As the UK promises to, once again (this time definitely promise) go ahead with the new border controls on EU to UK food imports starting on the 31 January 2024, it is time to start thinking about what the UK food supply chain will look like in a post-Brexit world.

But first, its important to understand why it has taken so long. It is nearly three years since the EU imposed full controls on UK goods entering the EU single market. In all that time the UK has operated outside the terms of the UK/EU free trade agreement, its own food safety laws and international trade rules.

Its not that the UK hasnt tried, we have had at least three fully formed plans formalised to (to coin a phrase) take control of our food border.But every time, faced with the looming reality of inevitable disruption and high costs for UK food consumers, Ministers have chosen to delay.

Industry responds to fifth delay for post-Brexit food import checks

The justification for delay has consistently been that industry has needed more time to prepare. That argument has never really been that persuasive. The reality is that no implementation timeframe is long enough to mitigate the downsides involved in having to impose complex, subjective, and costly barriers to trade. Also, whatever the lead-in period, a significant percentage of businesses will only react to change when it actually happens.

The delays are a function of indecision. Government has struggled in its resolve to do something damaging to our supply chains that has no obvious upside. The delayed imposition of food border controls is the last sticking plaster of the Brexit transition, and Ministers are really reluctant to whip it off.

It is very easy to be critical, but it is also important to recognise that there is significant ambition in the model that has now been brought forward. Government has tried very hard to find ways to minimise the burden of necessary food safety controls on as many importers as they can. This makes the new Border Operating Model a pretty unique (internationally speaking) risk categorisation approach, that means that large amounts of food imported into the UK (not just from Europe but from a number of markets around the world) will not have to provide the full range of certificates and verifications that would usually be required.

This innovation provides significant advantages for importers of foods deemed low risk. A deregulatory boon, especially those importing from markets outside the EU who will see their regulatory burden visibly decrease. But not so reassuring for those that are importing foods deemed medium or high risk who face the full burden of certification and inspection risk. For medium risk in particular, which means most meat, dairy and fish products, it will prove very frustrating and disruptive.

However, as the reality of the new risk-based regime comes into view the comparisons and apparent inconsistencies loom large. For example, beef from Ireland is a medium risk, and so will have to be certified every time it moves by an official vet and could be held and inspected at the border, whereas beef from New Zealand is low risk. Processed cheese is low risk, but goods containing raw milk from Europe is medium. It will also take quite some time for the new border enforcement agents and the importers to settle in and understand the new rules. Once they do, these rules will influence purchasing decisions, product formulations and lead to reorganisation of supply chains.

So, we will combine the indecisive policy decision making and implementation strategy of the past three years, with the significantly new framework that the UK border model represents and the general low levels of awareness and engagement in the European and international food industry, with the details of what the UK Government is about to do. We have to assume a period of disruption once the rules actually start to take effect from January next year. Only once we have got through that will the full implications be understood.

But even that assumes consistency of policy at the top and that is not something we can or should assume. With a general election in 2024, and promises to revisit the whole issue of the separation of UK and EU food safety laws coming from the main political opposition policies, it would be a brave business that settled on long-term strategic choices about how best to organise the way it supplies goods to the UK.

The reality is that Brexit is not done, it is an ongoing process and a shifting regulatory reality that businesses have lived with for the past three years and is unlikely to change fundamentally for some time yet.

Read this article:

The long road of Brexit: A shifting regulatory reality - New Food

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on The long road of Brexit: A shifting regulatory reality – New Food

Make-or-break moment looms for Northern Ireland’s failed government – POLITICO Europe

Posted: at 11:47 am

Press play to listen to this article

Voiced by artificial intelligence.

BELFAST Jeffrey Donaldson is a man under pressure.

The choice the Democratic Unionist Partys leader makes in the coming weeks will determine whether Northern Ireland regains the cross-community government at the heart of its peace process or falls deeper into a Brexit-fueled crisis that may last another year or more.

Senior figures in the British government and all five of Northern Irelands main political parties have told POLITICO that October looms as the make-or-break month for reviving power-sharing at Stormont, the Greek neoclassical parliament building that overlooks Belfast.

The introduction of long-awaited post-Brexit trade measures next month offers what may be the final political opportunity for Donaldson to break the deadlock before the election cycles of 2024 kick in.

When you get into the new year you are heading towards a general election, warned Chris Heaton-Harris, the U.K. governments Northern Ireland secretary, speaking at an investment conference in Belfast this week.

On October 1, the first phase of the Windsor Framework [post-Brexit agreement] comes in and we will see a big difference in how trade flows, and indeed how goods come into this country.

In normal times, Stormont is home to the Northern Ireland Assembly and a multi-party executive tasked with governing the divided U.K. region. But little has been normal since the Brexit vote of 2016, which shattered the careful balance of interests fundamental to Northern Irelands 1998 peace agreement.

Two U.K.-EU deals designed to avoid post-Brexit checks on goods crossing the land border between the north and the Republic of Ireland have satisfied Irish nationalist and middle-ground parties but so displeased Donaldsons DUP that it gridlocked the assembly in May 2022 and collapsed the executive in October.

Under prevailing rules, the Stormont system cannot function without the DUP, the main pro-British party in Northern Ireland. Donaldson insists this veto is the only leverage he has and he wont permit power-sharing to be restored unless the U.K. government gives him what he wants.

What precisely Donaldson wants is somewhat opaque, however.

In February, U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak finally unveiled his painstakingly negotiated Windsor Framework, an agreement with the EU designed to satisfy the DUP and break the Stormont deadlock by reducing and simplifying though not eliminating checks and restrictions on goods being shipped from Britain to Northern Ireland, the only U.K. region still required to maintain EU goods standards after Brexit.

Since then, Donaldson has spent six months to-ing and fro-ing with Downing Street and the U.K.s Northern Ireland Office over his demands for further unspecified concessions.

Were waiting on the last bit of information from the DUP about what they want, said Steve Baker, Heaton-Harris Northern Ireland Office deputy. When we get it, we will strain every sinew to give it to them, because we want them back.

Broadly, Donaldson wants even greater limits on the Brussels bureaucracy being planned at Northern Irish ports. He also wants symbolic and legal reassurances for unionists, who fear that the new trade regime will encourage local businesses to deal increasingly with Irish firms rather than British ones and lead, over time, to a united Ireland.

Heaton-Harris and Baker insist the deal on the table is the best the DUP will get. They hope unionists will be reassured by the low levels of checks being rolled out at Northern Irish ports next month, and say its now up to Donaldson to accept a further as yet unpublished package of concessions being offered behind the scenes.

Baker urged Donaldson to face down hard-line critics both within his party and on social media and radio shows who insist there can be no compromise.

He said Donaldson appeared constrained by a small number of really important opinion-formers who shape what the DUP does. Without naming them, Baker said these extremists were steering the life of Northern Ireland to a degree that is not really consistent with their status as unelected figures.

Donaldson rejects the U.K. governments portrayal of his position and their bilateral negotiations, insisting talks could continue indefinitely. There isnt a deadline here, he said.

But leaders of the other parties in Northern Irelands mothballed government told POLITICO that the DUPs response to the forthcoming Windsor Framework-related legislation, once published, will be crucial.

This is expected to happen by the first week of October, just before the DUPs annual conference on October 13-14, when Donaldson will face pressure either to accept a return to Stormont or confirm the party is staying out.

Doug Beattie, leader of the smaller moderate Ulster Unionist Party, said hes confident that Donaldson is about go back in, using the imminent U.K. legislative package as a fig leaf.

In the next week to 10 days we need to see the enabling legislation for the Windsor Framework, Beattie said, forecasting that the British government also would publish secondary bills strengthening the role of checks-free green lanes at Northern Irish ports and reasserting the constitutional position of Northern Ireland as part of the United Kingdom.

Then its for the DUP to make a decision whether thats enough for them to get back into the Stormont arena. The Windsor Framework is going to be implemented regardless, Beattie said.

This cant drag on beyond October, because then youre moving into the realms of a Westminster election.

If the DUP dont go back into Stormont next month, they wont be in until after May, Beattie said. And after May, with the likelihood of a new British government, the process starts all over again. It could be October, the end of the year, or even the following year. It would be a crazy road to take, which is why I dont believe Jeffrey will take it.

Other leaders arent so sure, in part because they see the DUP as internally split and Donaldsons position within his party as too weak. But they agree that, if the DUP doesnt shift position soon, Stormont faces a likely continued shutdown throughout 2024.

Jeffrey will have to eventually face down his critics. I just hope that he has the drive and the determination to do that, and to do it pretty quickly, said Naomi Long, who leads the Alliance Party, which represents middle-ground opinion between the British unionist and Irish nationalist camps.

If we dont get back this side of Christmas, its very hard to see how there will be another opportunity to come back to the table in the next year or so, Long said. We could be into a very prolonged hiatus, and that would be incredibly damaging to our public services, our public finances, and public confidence in our institutions. Were running out of road.

Read more:

Make-or-break moment looms for Northern Ireland's failed government - POLITICO Europe

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on Make-or-break moment looms for Northern Ireland’s failed government – POLITICO Europe