Monthly Archives: April 2023

Provence is a professor of Middle Eastern history at UC San Diego. He spent two and half years living in Syria as a Fulbright scholar from 1998 to 2002. He lives in Golden Hill.

A group of scholars, including Syrian and Syrian American activists and dissidents, will meet at UC San Diego tonight at the Roth Auditorium on Torrey Pines Drive to discuss the crisis in Syria and the Middle East. More than a year after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Syria remains the worlds gravest refugee crisis. Twelve years after the beginning of the Syrian uprising, there are still 14 million displaced Syrians. Millions are still in refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey.

What has the U.S. done to ease the disaster? What can be done now? Those are the questions we will discuss.

Twenty years ago last month, the United States invaded Iraq. The invasion unleashed what was then the most serious humanitarian crisis since the Second World War, and destabilized the Middle East in ways still unfolding today. Millions of Iraqis fled the violence America brought to their country, and more of them went to Syria than anywhere else.

Syria was a fairly stable authoritarian country in those days. But it was not a rich country and its resources were strained to house, feed and school the refugees. They were welcomed in any case. The Bush administration targeted Syria for its vocal opposition to the invasion of Iraq, and there was no aid for the Iraqi refugees in Syria. Meanwhile the U.S. spent $1 trillion destroying Iraq.

In 2011, during the Arab Spring uprisings, Syrian demonstrators challenged the authoritarian structures and corruption of their government. They were met with ferocious oppression and violence, and in turn, some came to answer regime violence with anti-regime violence, albeit never at the same level of destruction and loss of life. The world denounced the cruelty and violence the Syrian government unleashed on its own people, but no one did very much. The Obama administration played an ambivalent and uncertain role, encouraging but not supporting demonstrators, cooperating with the anti-Assad government Gulf states and Turkey but recoiling from the prospect of supplying weapons to any Syrian opponents of the regime. The contrast with Ukraine is stark. Syrians armed opposition, the Free Syrian Army, could not be trusted to defend itself from tyranny and injustice on the world stage.

Millions of refugees fled to neighboring countries, but few refugees wanted to imagine their lives unfolding in a rural refugee camp, and millions of those who could attempted to flee to safe countries that promised a decent future. Many families pooled their resources to send one or two military-age sons, to spare them conscription, and likely death, and, in an age-old migrant strategy, to save the family, one person at time. Families hoped those sons could cross the Mediterranean and, one day, help their loved ones left behind.

As in the 1930s and the Second World War, displaced people found many doors were closed, and some, like Viktor Orbns Hungary, were slammed shut, accompanied by a global tide of anti-immigrant, right-wing populism. A few countries reacted with a view to history, and the responsibilities of safety and privilege, notably Germany, Sweden, Canada and Austria. The refugees included doctors, engineers and people who contributed immediately to their new countries.

In the United States, President Barack Obamas government issued asylum visas for about 20,000 Syrians after he took office in 2009. But the Obama administration also dithered in its policy toward the Assad government, and in 2014 began an anti-Islamic State group bombing campaign that had the result of strengthening the Assad government and allowing direct intervention by allies Russia and Iran in the Syrian War. It is likely Obamas campaign saved Syrian President Bashar Assad from defeat, or at least from any need to compromise with his critics.

Donald Trump was inaugurated as U.S. president in January 2017 and issued his Muslim ban, explicitly aimed at Syrian refugees. Since that time, the traditional American asylum and refugee program, a vaunted feature of the post-World War II human rights consensus, has been shredded. There is no sign Washington has the courage or motivation to rebuild it.

We will hear from activist scholars who had firsthand experience in the Syrian opposition movement and state oppression, as refugees and as asylum seekers. Their stories deserve our attention.

What: A panel discussion titled How the U.S. Failed Syrians, sponsored by UC San Diego Institute of Arts and Humanities Middle East Studies Program

When: Today from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Where: Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicines Roth Auditorium, 2880 Torrey Pines Scenic Drive, UC San Diego

Both the panel discussion and parking are free and open to the public.

See more here:

Opinion: There are still 14 million displaced Syrians in crisis. We ... - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Read a PDF of our statement here.

MEDIA CONTACT: LDF Media,media@naacpldf.org;ACLU of Florida Media Office,media@aclufl.org, (786) 363-2737;

The coalition of civil rights groups is currently challenging last years STOP W.O.K.E. cnsorship law

TALLAHASSEE, FLThe Senate Fiscal Policy Committee voted yesterday to pass Senate Bill 266 (SB 266), which would enact draconian restrictions on academic freedom and chill speech on college and university campuses. The bill undermines tenure and puts critical faculty decisions, including hiring and retention, in the hands of political appointees. It also prohibits university spending on activities, speakers, events, and clubs that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion, threatening groups like historically Black sororities and fraternities and their ability to engage in activities and programming related to diversity, racism, oppression, and sexism.

The House Education and Employment Committee voted on Wednesday to pass the companion bill, House Bill 999 (HB 999). These bills could go to floor votes in their respective chambers as early as next week.

The bills target academic freedom in higher education one year after the passage of the unconstitutional Stop W.O.K.E censorship law, which wasblocked by a federal court in November 2022following a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), ACLU of Florida, the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), and Ballard Spahr on behalf of seven educators and one student.

Katie Blakenship, deputy legal director at the ACLU of Florida, responded with the following:

These bills target academic freedom in higher education, despite the fact that last years censorship law was blocked by a federal court in November and remains blocked to this day. They are intentionally harmful and attempt to erase the history and lived experiences of Americans of color, especially those who fought and continue to fight for equality. The bills will cause confusion and chill free speech, and their lasting effects would harm Floridians for generations. Furthermore, Black college students must now wonder if their historical societies, which played critical roles in the fight for civil rights and continue to serve as spaces that create community and cultural integration, will be targeted and whether their mission and activities promoting diversity and inclusion will be stifled. Every student deserves to learn in an environment free from government censorship. Every educator deserves the opportunity to do their job free from fear. A free society doesnt limit what people can teach and learn in their institutions of higher education.

Leah Watson, senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union Racial Justice Program, shared the following:

These bills further the state of Floridas ongoing attempts to eliminate discussions of systemic racism, sexism, oppression, and privilege from university programs and activities to undermine progress toward racial justice. Contrary to decades of research, the Stop W.O.K.E. Act censored higher education faculty from instruction that would teach students about the existence and current manifestations of these concepts. Now, the legislature seeks to erase them from campus life more broadly by prohibiting spending on any programs or activities that advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This attack on DEI will remove important support for students of color, erase their heritage from campuses and classrooms, and ultimately lead to increased racial bias.

Charles McLaurin, senior counsel at the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), responded with the following:

This expansion of Floridas Stop W.O.K.E. Act, which only serves to put the states education system at the mercy of political players, dangerously threatens educators and students abilities to teach and learn about their countrys history, and its impact on the present, both truthfully and accurately. We must be clear that this proposed legislation would only serve to harm the quality of higher education in the stateespecially for Black students, other students of color, and LGBTQ+ students whose histories, voices, and lived experiences would be willfully erased. Furthermore, this bill threatens the states ability to maintain a racially diverse student and teaching body, including Black professors, who are already severely underrepresented in academia. All educators and students in Florida classrooms and on college campuses are entitled to high-quality, accurate learning.

View original post here:

Civil Rights Organizations Condemn Passage of Bills that Stifles ... - NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

The battle between the United States and authoritarian regimes is moving beyond the confines of cyberspace and increasingly is playing out on U.S. soil as countries like China and Iran target dissidents and minority groups in ever more brazen operations.

FBI senior counterintelligence officials Wednesday warned of new tactics and of lines that are being crossed by a growing number of countries, saying the U.S. is now facing an inflection point in trying to fend off transnational repression.

The change that we're trying to highlight is sort of an increase in the level of threats, and threats of violence, threats of intimidation that cross lines we have not previously seen, a senior FBI counterintelligence official told reporters, briefing them on the condition of anonymity under guidelines set by the bureau.

China, Iran and other countries see this as a priority for them to stabilize their regimes and make sure that they continue to exist, a second senior official said. They're increasing the priority of this ... they're more willing to go on U.S. soil to go after dissidents.

Wednesdays warning from the FBI comes just days after the FBI arrested two New York City residents, charging them with operating a secret and illegal police station on behalf of Chinas Ministry of Public Security.

We cannot and will not tolerate the Chinese government's persecution of pro-democracy activists who have sought refuge in this country," U.S. Attorney Breon Peace said while announcing the charges on Monday.

We remain resolved and steadfast to fight against any efforts by the Chinese Communist Party to oppress and intimidate our residents, he added.

FBI officials declined Wednesday to share details on just how many countries are engaged in transnational repression, which includes tactics like stalking, intimidation, or assault, against people residing in the U.S.

Multiple threats

We try not to rack and stack threats, the first FBI official said, noting China and Iran have been significant offenders.

Other U.S. officials have pointed to indictments against suspects linked to Belarus, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. And concerns about Russia are ever present.

But regardless of which government is behind the acts of repression, human rights organizations agree the threat is growing.

A database maintained by the U.S.-based Freedom House has tracked 854 physical incidents of transnational repression committed in 91 countries by 38 governments since 2014, including 79 incidents in 2022 alone.

China was the most prolific, according to the Freedom House data, engaging in 253 incidents of what the organization described as direct, physical transnational repression over the past nine years.

Turkey was second, followed by Tajikistan, Russia, Egypt, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Belarus, Iran and Rwanda.

Growing sophistication

FBI and other law enforcement officials also warn that many of these countries are becoming more sophisticated and more brazen in their efforts to silence critics in the U.S.

In its Worldwide Threat Assessment earlier this year, U.S. intelligence agencies said the Chinese government is actively monitoring Chinese students abroad, mobilizing Chinese student associations to help stifle dissent.

And when that is not enough, Beijing is willing to enlist the aid of China-based commercial enterprises to help surveil and censor PRC critics, the report said.

As for Iran, the report cautioned that Tehran remains committed to developing surrogate networks inside the United States, an objective it has pursued for more than a decade.

Some of Irans attempts have made headlines in the U.S., including multiple plots targeting Masih Alinejad, an Iranian American human rights activist and VOA Persian TV host.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Justice Department charged three members of an Eastern European criminal gang in connection with a plot to kill Alinejad outside her New York City home.

In a separate plot last year, U.S. prosecutors charged a member of Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in a murder-for-hire plot targeting former U.S. national security adviser Ambassador John Bolton.

In another case, last year, an official with Chinas MPS was charged with trying to interfere with the congressional campaign of a U.S. military veteran who had been involved with the 1989 pro-democracy protests at Tiananmen Square.

Reaction

Chinas embassy in Washington, late Wednesday, rejected the FBIs allegations.

Chinas police do not engage in transnational repression and coercion against the so-called dissidents and dissenters, embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu told VOA in an email.

The Chinese government strictly abides by international law, and fully respects the law enforcement sovereignty of other countries, he said, accusing the U.S. of seeking to smear Chinas image.

Other countries named by U.S. officials as engaging in transnational repression, including Iran, Belarus, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, have yet to respond to requests for a response to the U.S. allegations.

U.S. officials, however, have repeatedly dismissed denials like those from China.

US pushback

As alleged, these brazen acts of transnational repression violate U.S. law; they infringe on our sovereignty; and perhaps most critically, they are an attack on our most fundamental values, U.S. Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said during a speech last month in Washington.

We will use every tool to expose the repressive tactics of autocratic regimes and force their agents to answer for their unlawful behavior, she said. And we will support our allies and partners in doing the same.

Over the past two years, the FBI has ramped up training, both for its analysts and for its field officers, including those who work closely with airports and other transportation hubs, to help them better recognize activities that may point to transnational repression plots.

But the governments engaging in transnational repression are finding more sophisticated ways to silence those they do not like, including the growing use by China and Iran of private investigators, who are not always aware of what is going on.

Weve seen where the private investigators are not witting to what's going on and where, in fact, the subjects are using some kind of cut-out company to mask who is behind, an FBI official told VOA separately, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

In other cases, the official said China has even tried to co-opt local police.

When you're dealing with local law enforcement, they tend to trust other law enforcement, the official told VOA. So, when they get a request from, let's say, Chinese law enforcement theyre going to accept it at face value.

FBI outreach

One of the things we're trying to do is to conduct outreach to private investigator associations, just to apprise them of the threat and explain if you get this type of request, it may be transnational oppression, the official said.

Same thing with local police departments, the official added. Part of the outreach is explaining hey, some of these countries use things like red notices for political reasons, where they're going after someone who disagrees with them, and the charges are made up.

The FBI has also invested in outreach to immigrant communities that have been targeted in the past or that are likely to be targeted in the future.

Already, the FBIs threat intimidation guide has been translated into more than 60 languages. And efforts to make sure those communities are comfortable dealing with the FBI are ongoing.

Still, it can be tricky.

Officials say authoritarian regimes often make good use of cyberspace to intimidate and silence those they do not like.

It's certainly an enabler, a second FBI official told VOA. Any country with even limited resources can certainly engage in at least online harassment with very little investment or expertise.

And some authoritarian regimes, like China and to a lesser extent Iran, have even managed to use threats and money to coerce those they are targeting to help silence others.

This is almost an area of potential double victimization, the second FBI official told VOA. A person could be threatened with impacts to their loved ones back in the autocratic country if they don't report on others here in the United States.

It's really challenging, the official added.

Masood Farivar contributed to this report.

Here is the original post:

FBI Warns of Inflection Point as Foreign Governments Target US Residents - Voice of America - VOA News

Facebook Twitter LinkedInPinterestReddit EmailPrint

There have been rumors about increasing fuel prices in Iran. While officials deny this, they tacitly confirm the reports through actions such as recollecting government-issued fuel cards from people. Meanwhile, many consider increasing fuel prices as playing with fire with severe consequences for the ruling theocracy.

The state TV keeps on speaking about the necessity to increase fuel prices due to the devaluation of Irans national currency, the rial, forcing an enormous financial burden on the government, thus leaving no choice for the regime but to increase fuel prices.

The regime tested the publics tolerance on April 4 by issuing an unsigned statement, confirming the increase in fuel prices. The Guardian Council and government have ratified increasing fuel prices to 50,000 rials for rationed gasoline and 750,000 rials for regular fuel, the statement read.

Fearing a public backlash, none of the regimes governing bodies took responsibility for this statement.Now, state officials try to recollect fuel cards under the pretext of combatting gasoline smuggling, which they claim amounts to 50 million liters daily. Even some state-run outlets have rejected this bogus claim.

The fuel tanker capacity is highly variable, with a maximum threshold of 35,000 liters. To put this into perspective, to smuggle a staggering 50 million liters of fuel, over 1,500 high-capacity road tankers must depart the nation daily! the state-run Etemad daily wrote on April 18.

Fuel smuggling in Iran is a reality. But the regime is to blame for it, as the borders, ports, and the countrys oil and gas industry are controlled by the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC).

Obviously, road tankers cannot smuggle 50 million liters of gasoline per day. Even if smugglers use fuel vans or trucks and trailers, which have a small capacity, hundreds of thousands of vehicles should line up at borders daily to smuggle this amount of gasoline. Such a scenario is unfeasible. Therefore, to effectively combat smuggling, authorities must dismantle the structured networks and entities that operate within official ports and borders, with access to their own private pipelines, the paper adds.

In another piece on April 21, Etemad acknowledged how authorities are playing with fuel prices and opting to plunder people further while fearing their reaction.

With many drivers still awaiting fuel cards, the recent news of gasoline price hikes, recollecting fuel cards, and authorities denial of such increases have caused a significant social disturbance. The governments sudden increase in fuel prices in November 2019, which officials had denied just a day prior, still lingers in societys memory. The aftermath of that incident proved to be arduous for the public. Consequently, experts speculate that the current game of cat-and-mouse played by the authorities regarding fuel price hikes is an attempt to gauge the publics patience, the paper wrote, warning about the consequences by reminding authorities about the major protests in November 2019, which rattled the regimes foundation.

By increasing fuel prices, the regime will shoot itself in the leg. Yet, the ruling theocracy desperately needs money to fund its oppressive apparatus and terrorism machine. Ebrahim Raisis government has a huge budget deficit of roughly $11 billion. Yet, his budget bill includes a whopping 131% increase for the IRGC, the regimes primary force of oppression.

In the interim, the bill mandates a minimum wage of 70 million rials per month or the equivalent of $171. In March, the Ministry of Labor estimated the poverty threshold to be approximately 150 million rials or $341 monthly. Furthermore, Iranian citizens are egregiously lacking in any form of governmental assistance, including social welfare and medical provisions. Raisi wants to compensate for his governments budget deficit by increasing taxes and digging his hands deeper into peoples pockets by raising the price of basic needs such as fuel.

By increasing fuel prices, the prices of other consumer goods will also skyrocket, putting more pressure on the Iranian people, who are deprived of their basic needs due to the countrys financial calamity. According to the state-run Donyaye Eqtesad website, taxi fares will increase by 45% starting April 24, and Aftab News reported a simultaneous 23% increase in Tehrans subway tickets

Inflation hovers above 50%, the prices are skyrocketing, and according to Irans state media, over 80% of the population lives under the poverty line.

The nightmare of downfall, particularly amid the ongoing nationwide uprising, haunts the clerical regime. Irans society is on the verge of another social explosion, and anything could lead to a devastating ending for the regime. Irans regime is walking on thin ice as the people have reached a point where they have nothing left to lose, and actions such as increasing fuel prices may only serve to hasten the regimes downfall.

Read the original:

Is Iran's Regime Playing with Fire by Increasing Fuel Prices? - NCRI - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)

Young people

Calls for police powers to be rolled back in favour of funding for youth services and mental health initiatives

Mon 24 Apr 2023 19.01 EDT

A community-led approach is needed to tackle serious youth violence, such as more funding for youth services and mental health initiatives while rolling back police powers, a report has said.

Education is central to the fight against serious youth violence, which must involve an end to school exclusions and the removal of police from schools, according to Holding Our Own: A guide to non-policing solutions to serious youth violence.

The report written by nine organisations working across human rights, youth services, racial justice, mental health and policing calls for a radical rethink of how the government tackles the issue across the UK.

It comes as polling revealed that 69% of people said the government should look for solutions to the root causes of youth violence rather than relying on policing, which disproportionately targets black people, and young black men and boys, in particular.

More than three-quarters (76%) of people said they were concerned about sexism and racism in policing.

The poll of 2,015 adults across the UK was carried out by Walnut Unlimited in March 2023. It found that more than four in five members of the public (81%) are concerned about police officers abusing their power.

Almost three-quarters (74%) would like to see more funding for youth services, which have faced severe funding cuts over the past decade, the report says.

Martha Spurrier, the director of Liberty, said: Whatever our postcode or the colour of our skin, we all deserve to grow up with the support and care we need to thrive.

But thats not the reality for many young people growing up today. Communities have been stripped of resources, and in place of real support for young people the government has simply handed the police more and more powers to harass and target people particularly young black people.

The result is a failure to tackle the root causes of serious youth violence, and a lifetime of trauma for those young people targeted by dehumanising police tactics like strip-search and stop and search.

The report says the government has continued to hand more powers to the police through the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act and the public order bill despite an erosion in public trust.

This report shows an alternative is possible. By rolling back police powers and investing in the solutions that our communities need, we can ensure that no young person is subjected to abuse of power by the police, and that everyone is given the best chance in life, Spurrier added.

More funding for mental health care is also needed, the report says. Amy Wells, the communications manager for the National Survivor User Network, a charity that supports people who have lived experience of mental distress, said: Wed like people to understand where a call for more mental health services can be problematic, because of the harm people can experience within the system, including through coercion and police involvement.

What we want to see is investment in community-based approaches to mental health support. In our network there are hundreds of user-led grassroots groups working within their communities to meet specific needs in ways that larger organisations and statutory services cant or wont.

They offer support emotional, cultural, material, practical, financial that also seeks to alter or alleviate social conditions that drive distress or mental ill-health, including marginalisation and oppression. However, they are extremely under-funded and under-resourced we want to see this change.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

See the original post here:

Community-led approach needed to tackle youth violence in UK, report finds - The Guardian

New Delhi: The Tamil Nadu Assembly adopted a resolution on Wednesday, April 19, urging the Union government to extend statutory protection, rights, and concessions, including reservation, to Scheduled Caste members who have converted to Christianity.

After moving the resolution, chief minister M.K. Stalin said it is unfair to deny Dalit Christians the benefits of reservations enjoyed by the other members of the same community only because of their conversion to Christianity.

While humans have the right to follow the religion of their choice, they cannot do it in the case of caste. Caste is not just about the identity of two different persons. On the other hand, it treats one as higher and the other as lower. It is not horizontal, but vertical. The philosophy of social justice is to use the same casteism, a tool of oppression, to provide reservation and uplift the victims of oppression. It is the objective of the Dravidian Model Government to follow in all aspects, The Hindu quoted Stalin as saying after moving the resolution before the Assembly.

The four MLAs of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) walked out of the House, opposing the resolution. Speaker M. Appavu expunged the remarks made by BJP MLA, Vanathi Srinivasan, on the issue. According to the Times of India, Srinivasan called the resolution by Stalins government a diversionary tactic, questioning the rationale behind bringing out a such resolution at a time when the Union government, led by her party, had constituted a committee to examine the need to extend quota to Dalit Christians.

Meanwhile, Stalin questioned the constitutional position of not extending reservations to Dalits who convert to Christianity and Islam. As per the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order of 1950, no person belonging to a religion other than Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism can be deemed Scheduled Caste and hence cannot avail reservation.

Advertisement

Advertisement

When they remain as the Scheduled Castes historically, it is but fair to extend them the benefits. They can get education and employment only through reservation, Stalin argued, adding that Adi Dravidars continued to face caste atrocities even after conversion to Christianity. Adi Dravidars are categorised as a Dalit community in Tamil Nadu.

Stalin recalled that former chief minister M. Karunanidhi had written to the then prime ministers in 1996, 2006, and 2011 requesting for reservations to be extended to Dalit Christians.

He also said that his government had made rules to extend all benefits, except reservation, available for Dalits, to Adi Dravidards who accepted Christianity. The chief minister said it was part of his partys, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagams, election manifesto.

Meanwhile, the Union government has made it clear, through multiple affidavits filed before the Supreme Court, that it is not willing to extend quota to Dalit Christians and Muslims. In November 2022, it had claimed alleged foreign contributions as justification for keeping Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians out of the Scheduled Castes list.

Similarly, in an affidavit filed before the top court in December 2022, it had made it clear that it was not willing to consider the recommendations of the2007 Justice Ranganath Misra Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities, which suggested that reservations benefits be extended to Dalits who accepted Christianity and Islam.

The government affidavit had called the 2007 commissions report flawed, as it was composed within the four walls of a room. The Modi government, however, had constituted in October 2022Justice K.G. Balakrishnan Commission to consider the pleas of Dalits Christians and Muslims to be included in reservation quotas. The time period granted to the Justice Balakrishnan Commission is two years.

Recently, on April 13, when the issue came before the top court, the Union government had requested the court to delay the hearing until the latest commissions report is ready. However, the court dismissed the governments plea. Tomorrow there will be a different political dispensation which may say that new report is not acceptable. How many committees would be appointed? the court had slammed the government.

Stating that the matter has been pending for almost 20 years, the three-member bench of the apex court had observed, Social stigma and religious stigma are different things. Social stigma may continue even after conversion. We cannot shut our eyes when we are considering all these constitutional matters.

Read this article:

Extend Reservation to Dalit Christians, Tamil Nadu Assembly Tells Centre in Resolution - The Wire

The Russian Permanent Mission to the UN Office in Geneva received a letter from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Trk, a letter in which Trk condemned the 25-year prison sentence against outspoken Kremlin critic Vladimir Kara-Murza.

Kara-Murza, 41, holds both Russian and British passports and has spent years as a politician opposing Russian President Vladimir Putin and lobbied foreign governments and institutions to impose sanctions on Russia and individual Russians for purported human rights violations.

"We are grateful to Mr. Trk for his close attention paid to domestic affairs in our country and the prompt comments," Russian Ambassador Gennady Gatilov said in a statement. "Undoubtedly, taking into account the principle of neutrality of the UN bodies, his Office must have already written and sent out similar letters to the permanent missions of the US and France."

"It is regrettable that Mr. Trk persistently continues to exemplify notorious 'double standards' and political bias towards the countries regarded as 'objectionable' by the specific group of Western states," he continued. "This once again casts doubt on the impartiality of the High Commissioner and his Office."

The British government summoned the Russian ambassador to make clear its condemnation of what it described as the "politically motivated" conviction and sentencing of outspoken Kara-Murza, a British dual national.

The German foreign ministry sharply condemns the sentencing of Kara-Murza, a spokesperson for the ministry said on Monday during a government press conference.

The United Nations human rights chief called on Moscow to free Kara-Murza.

"No one should be deprived of their liberty for exercising their human rights, and I call on the Russian authorities to release him without delay," said Volker Turk in a statement.

He added that the sentence was "another blow to the rule of law and civic space in the Russian Federation".

The United States condemns the sentencing of Kremlin critic Vladimir Kara-Murza for "speaking out against the Russian governments war of aggression against Ukraine," the US State Department said in a statement on Monday.

"Mr. Kara-Murza is yet another target of the Russian governments escalating campaign of repression," the department said after Russia sentenced Kara-Murza to 25 years in prison on treason and other charges earlier on Monday.

France's foreign ministry on Monday condemned the sentencing of Kremlin critic Vladimir Kara-Murza to 25 years in prison for treason, saying the Russian justice system had become a tool for oppression.

It added that the sentencing was another illustration of the Russian authorities' campaign of repression against all voices critical of the Russian leadership and its war of aggression against Ukraine.

Norway's foreign ministry on Monday condemned the sentencing of Kremlin critic and human rights activist Vladimir Kara-Murza to 25 years in prison.

"This is a deeply alarming and harsh sentence for exercising the right to freedom of expression," Norwegian foreign minister Anniken Huitfeldt said in a statement.

Father of three and former journalist was jailed for 25 years by a Russian court after they found him guilty of treason and other offenses he denied.

State prosecutors accused him of treason and of discrediting the Russian military after he criticized what Moscow calls its "special military operation" in Ukraine.

Hours before his arrest, Kara-Murza told CNN in an interview, alleging that Russia was being run by a "regime of murderers. He had also used speeches in the United States and across Europe to accuse Moscow of bombing civilian targets in Ukraine, a charge it has rejected.

In his final speech to the court, Kara-Murza had compared his own trial, which was held behind closed doors, to Josef Stalin's show trials in the 1930s and had declined to ask the court to acquit him, saying he stood by and was proud of everything he had said.

Follow this link:

Russia attacks UN envoy for 'political bias' over jailed Putin critic - The Jerusalem Post

Facebook Twitter LinkedInPinterestReddit EmailPrint

The Iranian regimes supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, delivered two speeches this week, in which he made it clear the nationwide uprising and its persistence have created a deadlock for the ruling theocracy.

While repeating his rhetoric about overcoming the riots and other bogus claims, Khamenei once again underlined the necessity of oppression and that he cannot retreat a single step in the face of mounting pressure.

Referendum

In his remarks on Tuesday addressing members of the so-called university Basij, Khamenei once again rejected the idea of having a referendum, suggested by so-called reformist figures within the regime as the only way to save the mullahs rule.

How can we put the countrys different issues on a referendum? Do all participants qualify to analyze those issues? What is this nonsense? How could there be a referendum? They speak about holding a referendum for six months to polarize society. No, this is not going to happen, he said.

Those advocating for a referendum are opting to preserve the ruling theocracy but have a more share of power.

Despite witnessing the countrys volatile society due to the regimes decades of corruption, ineptitude, and oppression, those seeking a referendum are still trying to prevent the uprising from expanding.

They do so by desperately attempting to use the so-called systems capabilities as if there is a solution within a regime that the entire Iranian population wants to overthrow.

Khamenei knows the regimes best interests, as his destiny is tied to the systems existence. He has clearly heard people chanting Death to Khamenei and Poverty, corruption, high prices, we continue until regime change and is aware of their unwavering determination to topple the clerical regime. By blatantly rejecting the Iranian peoples right to self-determination about their countrys future, Khamenei tries to imply that he will not loosen his grip on power even a bit.

In his speech, Khamenei considered privatization as the only solution to the countrys economic crunch.

People should control the important economic sectors. I have repeatedly said governmental and semi-private companies shouldnt compete with the private sector. We thought the government could realize economic justice, but it didnt. Now we have to have people and the private sector to generate income, he said.

The terms private sector or giving economic opportunities to people serve as a euphemism employed by Khamenei to denote the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) and its economic juggernauts alongside the preeminent conglomerate of the regimes supreme leader. Any enterprise wishing to attain substantial economic might in Iran must have ties with the IRGC.

Khamenei tacitly urged the Ebrahim Raisi government to implement the so-called public assets plan. This plan is being supervised by a delegation of seven high-ranking officials with full authority to decide what needs to be sold. It is an effort to cover the governments massive budget deficit, which has been largely allotted to the IRGC.

In a nutshell, Khameneis wailing for the private sectors interests once again shows the regime has no solution for Irans financial problems and will result in further plundering of public assets.

Now, can Khamenei proceed with his plans in the regime? His speech on Saturday during Eid-al-Fitrs prayer sermon implies that he cannot.

In his speech on Saturday, Khamenei acknowledged his failure to consolidate power in his regime and among the three branches.

A very important strategy is the cooperation between heads of three branches. They all should cooperate and synthesize. The constitution has created a perfect opportunity for them to work together; if so, they can overcome every problem. I advise the heads of the three branches not to block each others path and instead to pave the way for one another, he said.

Following the major November 2019 uprising that rattled his regimes foundations, Khamenei realized that the slightest disunity in his regime could lead to the ruling theocracys demise. So, he began consolidating power. He first purged the candidates of the rival faction in the sham parliamentary elections in 2020 and literally handpicked parliamentarians. In June 2021, Khamenei ensured the victory of Ebrahim Raisi in the sham presidential elections, despite an unprecedented nationwide boycott and Raisis dark human rights record. A few weeks later, the Supreme Leader installed Gholam Hossein Mohseni-EjeI, another notorious criminal, as the head of the judiciary.

Khamenei described Raisis presidency as the sweetest event in 2021. Less than two years, Raisis failure to address the countrys economic and social crises has increased the regimes infightings. With the dismissal and resignation of five key cabinet members, four Ministers, and the head of the Planning and Budget Organization, Raisi holds the record of changes in a cabinet in the last 44 years. Besides, there have been growing calls in the regimes parliament for his impeachment.

The consistency of the nationwide uprising in the last seven months, despite the regimes severe crackdown, and the prospect of a more extensive and devastating wave of dissent have exacerbated the regimes infighting, preventing Khamenei from consolidating power in his regime.

While Ali Khamenei is not known for exposing himself to criticism and refrains from public appearances when possible, addressing his supporters twice in less than a week and calling for unity was a humiliating debacle for him after his victory rhetoric. The Iranian peoples unwavering determination to topple the clerical regime has revealed its weakness and its bleak future.

See the article here:

Khamenei's Speeches: A Humiliating Debacle for Iran's Regime ... - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI)

Muzaffarabad [PoK], April 23 (ANI): Pakistan suffered an embarrassing setback when the self-proclaimed Prime Minister of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK), Sardar Tanveer Ilyas was disqualified for contempt of court, Asian Lite International reported.

PoKs High Court on April 11 declared Ilyas unfit to be a member of the legislative assembly due to contempt charges and from holding any public office for two years.

This decision came after Ilyas was summoned to the PoK Supreme Court and high court for using derogatory language about the superior judiciary in his public speeches.

Ilyas belongs to Imran Khans Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) and is the first serving PoK prime minister to be disqualified on contempt charges, as per Asian Lite International.

This development is another illustration of how the phoney political structures in the PoK are failing miserably and inflicting great misery on the local populace.

Ilyas was a known troublemaker who constantly fought with the leaders of his own party and those of other political groups. He got into a heated argument with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during the unveiling of the Mangla Dam Hydroelectric Power Plants Units 5 and 6 refurbishment project last year. Ilyas publicly denounced Shehbaz for neglecting to recognise the sacrifices made by the Kashmiri people for the progress and prosperity of Pakistan during the refurbishment project. Sharif responded to the humiliation by sealing the Ilyas family-owned Centaurus Mall in Islamabad as payback, according to Asian Lite International.

Following the heated exchange between the Prime Ministers of PoK and Pakistan at the event in Mangla, the government ordered the CDA to seal the building at 3 am as retaliation.

Ilyas bemoaned the political victimisation the ruling Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) administration had inflicted upon him as a result of the mall sealing episode. He was not successful in getting the public to back PTI as he had planned. He said that the PDM in power was attempting to overthrow his administration in PoK by paying off lawmakers from his party in December of last year. PoK has suffered immensely since assuming his so-called premiership in last April. The PoK is currently experiencing serious fuel and food shortages as Pakistan is on the verge of becoming bankrupt.

Regular sit-ins and protests have taken place in these places, but the local political establishment has not complied with the populaces demands. It is significant that PoK is usually governed by the same party that controls Islamabad.

The situation became far more complicated in the occupied territory, with a PTI leader in power in PoK and the PDM government in Islamabad. With another PTI leader, Chaudhry Anwarul Haq replacing Ilyas, the political turmoil in PoK is likely to worsen in the coming months, Asian Lite International reported.

After Haq got appointed as the new Prime Minister of PoK, in a late-night assembly session, Ilyas expressed his concerns, releasing a statement, Today, I have come to know about the machinations of Haq. On the one hand, he was assuring PTI leadership of his efforts to save the party, on the other, he was striking a deal with the establishment.

A week-long impasse brought on by Ilyass disqualification seemed to be resolved when Haq was declared the joint candidate of the combined opposition and a 12-member PTI forward bloc in PoKs legislative assembly. Ilyas attempted to challenge his disqualification on technical grounds, but the PoK Supreme Court rejected his case on April 12. This allowed other PTI leaders to step into Ilyas position. The Tehreek-e-Jawanan Pakistan and Kashmir (TJPK) leadership, however, rejected the unconstitutional decision on April 15 and announced the Justice Movement for PoK Leader Sardar Tanveer Illyas, which would start following Pakistans Eid-ul-Fitr holidays.

The protestors criticised the decision, saying, We do not accept these rules of oppression, we do not accept these decisions of repression, the unconstitutional decision against Sardar Tanveer Ilyas is unacceptable, these rules of oppression are unacceptable. Such reactions hint that the Pakistan Army used local courts in PoK to remove Ilyas from power.

Ilyas abrupt disqualification has raised a lot of questions regarding the decision-making process. According to media reports, cited by Asian Lite International, the court was notified by Ilyass social media posts that were disparaging of the judiciary. The Council of Judges sent notice to Ilyas on April 10 after the court was given a newspaper clip of his speech. Ilyas was removed from office within 24 hours of receiving the notice based on prima facie evidence. It has never happened before for a PoK prime minister to be ousted from office without due process.

Despite the central leadership of the PTI calling for respect for the courts judgement, Ilyass expulsion is a setback to Imran Khans party, which is now engaged in a power struggle with the ruling PDM government and the military establishment. The political intrigue that follows in PoK is probably going to make things worse for the locals there, Asian Lite International reported. (ANI)

This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Continued here:

Disqualification of PoK Prime Minister adds to ongoing political upheaval - ThePrint

Madurai: A study undertaken in 114 reserved panchayats by dalits rights organization Evidence has found that panchayat presidents undergo caste-based oppression ranging from verbal abuse by dominant castes to assault. One panchayat leader was killed as well. Evidence executive director A Kathir told reporters on Thursday that they deployed 17 researchers in March for a field study in 19 districts. There are 12,525 panchayats in the state, of which 2,352 are reserved for scheduled castes. Almost all of the 114 presidents acknowledged they faced oppression which could be categorised into 30 types including sexual harassment of women panchayat leaders. The president of Tharavendiram panchayat in Krishnagiri district, Narasimhamoorthy, was murdered in August 2022. Relatives of presidents have been assaulted in many reserved panchayats, Kathir said. In all, 87 panchayat presidents said they are discriminated based on caste, 60 felt being not respected while 78 complained of interference in resolutions. Besides, 79 presidents complained they were not allowed to exercise their duties. More than 11 complained they are not allowed inside offices, and 23 said they are forced to sign on panchayat documents. Twelve panchayat presidents said they are not allowed to hoist national flag and 30 said they are denied information about panchayat schemes. Most of the time, vice-presidents and members from dominant castes are the oppressors, Kathir said. Women panchayat leaders face caste and patriarchal discrimination. Most of the panchayat leaders acknowledged that they are not able to carry out their works, and live in constant fear of assault. Kathir demanded a white paper from the government on caste discrimination on dalit panchayat presidents. Government should pay the panchayat presidents a monthly salary of Rs 10,000 and Rs 5,000 as pension. There should be state nodal officer to take care of reserved panchayats and the district collector and SP should be intimated about the amendment in SC/ST act that empowers them to take action on anyone preventing the Dalit panchayat presidents from taking out their duties.

See more here:

Dalit panchayat chiefs face all-round oppression: Study - Times of India