Monthly Archives: February 2023

Jitsi Meet review | TechRadar

Posted: February 18, 2023 at 5:16 am

With so many meetings migrating from the physical to the digital, its no wonder that a huge number of video conferencing platforms have emerged. In this Jitsi Meet review, we take a look at one of the best video conferencing software in 2021 (opens in new tab).

Jitsi Meet (opens in new tab) takes simplicity and ease of use to new levels and enables you to conduct a video call for multiple participants without an account and for free. Read on to learn whether Jitsi Meet has the functionality you require to host your next video conferencing event.

Jitsi Meet is a subsidiary of VoIP company 8x8, and the companys paid-for video conferencing service, 8x8 Meet, a more feature-heavy version of Jitsi Meet, is advertised on the Jitsi Meet website. Jitsi Meet itself is free forever and doesnt include any tiered price plans.

You can also install Jitsi as a service on an existing website or app to create an integrated video calling function. 8x8 Jitsi as a Service (JaaS) is a separate product developed by the Jitsi organization and is free to use, but active users are capped at 25.

Beyond this, JaaS Basic allows 300 users and costs $99 dollars a month, Jaas Standard costs $499 a month and facilitates up to 1,500 users, while for $999, Jaas Business allows 3,000 active users.

Jitsi is an open-source platform that includes a number of audio and video communication projects. Jitsi Meet is the platforms flagship product and is free to use as a web, iOS, Android, or F Droid app. It includes HD audio and video, unlimited meetings for up to 50 guests, end-to-end encryption, screen sharing, remote desktop controls, and third-party integrations with Google, Slack, and Microsoft products.

Unusually for free video conferencing software, which regularly cap the length of meetings, Jitsti enables you to stay online for as long as is necessary. Meetings are in HD video and audio, and you can invite up to 50 participants.

Its easy to share meeting invites too. All you need to do is create a custom URL and distribute it to your guests.

Jitsi Meet integrates with Google, Microsoft, and Slack. You can use this integration to connect your calendar, add a browser extension, live stream video content on YouTube (via a Google account), and more.

For a free-to-use service, we were very impressed by the number of in-call options available. As well as screen sharing, remote desktop control, and a chat facility, there are the options to mute speakers, blur your background, record calls, and manage call quality.

As a moderator, you can also decide on other call parameters. For example, you can select an option that ensures everyone who joins the call is automatically muted.

Creating a meeting using Jitsi Meet is incredibly quick and simple. You dont have to create an account or provide any personal details. You just need to navigate to the website and enter a name for your meeting.

Next, a new meeting screen opens and you can join. There is a large Invite more people button at the top of the page. When you select this option, you can choose to share the meeting URL, or invite people in via a dial-in number.

Fundamental features such as screen sharing, leave call, mute, and chat functions are located prominently at the base of the screen. Further in-call functions are accessed via the three vertical dots to the right of the meeting screen. They are well referenced and easy to distinguish.

We were impressed by the call and video quality. We were also surprised to see the high level of design and functionality that had gone into a free service.

There is no dedicated commercial or personal support for Jitsi Meet. Instead, any queries should be directed to the community. As an open-source project, its not surprising that the Jitsi community page is very active.

Its not difficult to find help if you need it by searching for topics. You can also navigate via the Categories tab. Although not a dedicated support page, it is a helpful resource, and the Jitsi community is very passionate and active.

Security is a key concern for the Jitsi Meet platform. The product includes a rage of advanced security measures that can be toggled during calls. These include the option to create meeting passwords; lobby mode, which only enables users to enter a meeting if approved by a moderator; and end-to-end encryption.

At present, Jitsi Meets end-to-end encryption feature is in what it refers to as experimental mode. One of the consequences of this is that server-side functions, such as recording and live streaming, are disabled when the encryption feature is enabled.

Zoom is probably the most popular video conferencing software available with paid-for and free options, but for the purposes of this review, well just compare its free plan. In many ways, Jitsi Meet blows it out of the water. As well as a sleeker design, the platform enables unlimited call times, while Zooms group calls are capped at 40 minutes on the free plan.

Microsoft Teams free plan does enable up to 100 participants, double the allowance on Jitsi Meet, but again calls are capped on time: with Microsoft Teams there is a 60-minute limit. On top of this, both Zoom and Microsoft teams require you to create an account.

We were thoroughly impressed by the breadth of features, ease of use, and enhanced security Jitsi Meet provided. Some users may be put off by the fact that support can only be accessed through the community, but this is a common feature of open source projects.

Jitsi Meet deserves to be well-known beyond the developer community. The unlimited call limit alone is enough for us to rate this as one of the best, if not the best, free meeting platforms available.

The rest is here:
Jitsi Meet review | TechRadar

Posted in Jitsi | Comments Off on Jitsi Meet review | TechRadar

Introduction to Cryonics – Alcor

Posted: at 5:16 am

Cryonics is an effort to save lives by using temperatures so cold that a person beyond help by todays medicine can be preserved for decades or centuries until a future medical technology can restore that person to full health.

Cryonics sounds like science fiction, but is based on modern science. Its an experiment in the most literal sense of the word. The question you have to ask yourself is this: would you rather be in the experimental group, or the control group?

Cryonics is justified by three facts that are not well known:

1) Life can be stopped and restarted if its basic structure is preserved.

Human embryos are routinely preserved for years at temperatures that completely stop the chemistry of life. Adult humans have survived cooling to temperatures that stop the heart, brain, and all other organs from functioning for up to an hour. These and many other lessons of biology teach us that life is a particular structure of matter. Life can be stopped and restarted if cell structure and chemistry are preserved sufficiently well.

2) Vitrification (not freezing) can preserve biological structure very well.

Adding high concentrations of chemicals called cryoprotectants to cells permits tissue to be cooled to very low temperatures with little or no ice formation. The state of no ice formation at temperatures below -120C is called vitrification. It is now possible to physically vitrify organs as large as the human brain, achieving excellent structural preservation without freezing.

3) Methods for repairing structure at the molecular level can now be foreseen.

The emerging science of nanotechnology will eventually lead to devices capable of extensive tissue repair and regeneration, including repair of individual cells one molecule at a time. This future nanomedicine could theoretically recover any preserved person in which the basic brain structures encoding memory and personality remain inferable, which typically occurs well after spontaneous function has been lost.

So

Then cryonics should work, even though it cannot be demonstrated to work today. That is the scientific justification for cryonics. It is a justification that grows stronger with every new advance in preservation technology.

Death occurs when the chemistry of life becomes so disorganized that normal operation cannot be restored. (Death is not when life turns off. People can and have survived being turned off.) How much chemical disorder can be survived depends on medical technology. A hundred years ago, cardiac arrest was irreversible. People were called dead when their heart stopped beating. Today death is believed to occur 4 to 6 minutes after the heart stops beating because after several minutes it is difficult to resuscitate the brain. However, with new experimental treatments, more than 10 minutes of warm cardiac arrest can now be survived without brain injury. Future technologies for molecular repair may extend the frontiers of resuscitation beyond 60 minutes or more, making todays beliefs about when death occurs obsolete.

Ultimately, real death occurs when cell structure and chemistry become so disorganized that no technology could restore the original state. This is called the information-theoretic criterion for death. Any other definition of death is arbitrary and subject to continual revision as technology changes. That is certainly the case for death pronounced on the basis of absent vital signs today, which is not real death at all.

The object of cryonics is to prevent death by preserving sufficient cell structure and chemistry so that recovery (including recovery of memory and personality) remains possible by foreseeable technology. If indeed cryonics patients are recoverable in the future, then clearly they were never really dead in the first place. Todays physicians will simply have been wrong about when death occurs, as they have been so many times in the past. The argument that cryonics cannot work because cryonics patients are dead is a circular argument.

More than one hundred people have been cryopreserved since the first case in 1967. More than one thousand people have made legal and financial arrangements for cryonics with one of several organizations, usually by means of affordable life insurance. Alcor is the largest organization, and distinguished among cryonics organizations by its advanced technology and advocacy of a medical approach to cryonics.

Alcor procedures ideally begin within moments of cardiac arrest. Blood circulation and breathing are artificially restored, and a series of medications are administered to protect the brain from lack of oxygen. Rapid cooling also begins, which further protects the brain. The goal is to keep the brain alive by present-day criteria for as long as possible into the procedure. It is not always possible to respond so rapidly and aggressively, but that is Alcors ideal, and it has been achieved in many cases.

In 2001 Alcor adapted published breakthroughs in the field of organ preservation to achieve what we believe is ice-free preservation (vitrification) of the human brain. This is a method of stabilizing the physical basis of the human mind for practically unlimited periods of time. The procedure involves partly replacing water in cells with a mixture of chemicals that prevent ice formation. Kidneys have fully recovered after exposure to the same chemicals in published studies.

Alcors future goals include expanding ice-free cryopreservation (vitrification) beyond the brain to include the entire human body, and reducing the biochemical alterations of the process to move closer to demonstrable reversibility. Based on the remarkable progress being made in conventional organ banking research, we believe that demonstrably reversible preservation of the human brain is a medical objective that could be achieved in the natural lifetime of most people living today.

To learn more, please read our list of Frequently Asked Questions and the many other articles in the Alcor Library.

Figure 1: Pre-1992 freezing damage in brain tissue after treatment with 3 molar glycerol. This light micrograph prepared by freeze substitution in the frozen state shows extensive ice crystal damage. This is the kind of damage that many commentators assume is common in cryonics patients. Their assumption is outdated and incorrect.

Figure 2: Pre-1992 freezing damage in brain tissue after treatment with 4 molar glycerol. This electron micrograph prepared after thawing shows tears surrounding a capillary, and a naked cell nucleus with no cell membrane (dark rounded object). There seems to be less damage in frozen-thawed tissue than in tissue imaged in the frozen state.

Figure 3: 1992-2001 freezing damage in brain tissue after treatment with 7.5 molar glycerol. This electron micrograph prepared after thawing shows tears surrounding a capillary, but otherwise good structural preservation. With this protocol, ice damage occurs at intervals throughout the brain, but with most of the volume remaining ice-free.

Figure 4: Today brain tissue preserved with a modern vitrification solution shows virtually no freezing damage. Whole neurons are visible with intact membranes and well defined structure. This is the excellent brain preservation which Alcor can now achieve in human patients. Most experts who complain about damage caused by cryonics procedures are unaware that such preservation is now possible.

Originally posted here:

Introduction to Cryonics - Alcor

Posted in Cryonics | Comments Off on Introduction to Cryonics – Alcor

Zoom vs Jitsi for video conferencing? | ONLYOFFICE Blog

Posted: at 5:16 am

Digitalization encourages people and teams worldwide to have a secure and stable video conferencing software at hand. Zoom is a big player with hundreds of millions users. But is it really the best solution and could open-source alternatives like Jitsi be worthy competitors? Find answers in this article.

While theyre both video conferencing solutions, difference between the two is huge in some aspects.

Zoom provides cutting-edge communication technologies for various industries, including retail, education, government, and healthcare. Theres a free plan with limitations which well cover in this article. However, most plans require payment to unlock the best perks and yes, these options arent really budget-friendly.

Jitsi is an open-source and entirely free counterpart. Trusted by 20 million users worldwide, this software markets similar features to those you have in any paid video conferencing app. Meanwhile, its super flexible in fact, you can make calls without an account.

Already sure about your choice? Well, picking the suitable solution is not as easy as it seems. Read on to learn benefits of Zoom and Jitsi for personal and corporate use, plus some extra factors you should consider.

Both video conferencing services have evolved during the last years. Each of them offers several products.

Zoom users can choose between 4 products for getting in touch via video and audio calls:

Additional functionalities are VoIP phone service and conversation intelligence for getting valuable insights, understand sales deals better, and predict revenue.

Because each solution comprises different functionality sets, pricing vary depending on your demand.

Jitsi is responsible for developing 2 major projects:

Jitsi software is WebRTC compatible and completely open-source the code is available on GitHub.

The cost of video conferencing software is a vital aspect for most teams, since every business wants spare on digital solutions and invest money in growth.

Zoom offers a free plan with the following features:

The basic plan is enough for personal communication, whereas companies would consider paid plans with powerful features. Prices start at $149 per user/month and may include:

This list only contains the most important features. Visit this page to discover all Zoom One capabilities or prices of other Zoom products.

Jitsi Meet is totally free for meetings, no matter how long you talk to teammates. The sound and image quality is also up to standards. Also, you can embed conferences on websites and restream to sharing services, such as YouTube.

Note: Jitsi is a trademark of 88 that still provides some paid functionality within their own app, which is not open-source. That could be a great option for those who need a cheaper Zoom alternative, though. See prices for 88

Yes. Although we dont know exactly the brand of your laptop or cell phone, both video conferencing solutions are available for Windows, Linux, Mac, and mobile operating systems iOS and Android.

In fact, you can even start a meeting in your browser.

It sometimes happens that youre not satisfied with the native functionality of a video conferencing solution and want to enhance it with third-party plugins.

Zoom is a friendly solution for connecting various apps for broadcasting, analytics, CRM, collaboration, and more. Some popular examples are HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Asana etc. Visit App Marketplace to discover all Zoom integrations.

Jitsi also can be integrated with some well-known solutions like Slack, HumHub, Softgarden etc.

Security and privacy is vital for successful video conferencing. Nobody wants unauthorized people to have access to private discussions with sensitive information.

Jitsi is security-focused and offers ephemeral meeting rooms, which means they only exist during the meeting. Other privacy options include password protection, lobby, end-to-end encryption. Jitsi Meet for on-premise deployment does not have any preconfigured analytics engines. Even in the online version, they dont retain any personal information, such as names or emails.

Zoom is considered relatively safe thanks to end-to-end encryption. However, trusted sources report that Zoom uses the AES-128 algorithm instead of AES-256, which makes its security more vulnerable to some extent. Additionally, you wont be able to check the source code of this software to make sure it doesnt contain viruses and backdoors.

In practice, both solutions proved to be well-protected. If you follow basic information security guidelines on your workplace, hacking and outside attacks arent likely to happen.

Both Zoom and Jitsi can be connected with ONLYOFFICE Docs as plugins.

Such add-ons allow meeting up with teammates to briefly discuss the document, collaborate, and share your thoughts concerning texts, spreadsheets, or presentations without leaving office software.

ZOOM PLUGIN JITSI PLUGIN

Discover how to install plugins in self-hosted ONLYOFFICE Docs in this video:

The right choice depends on what you expect from a video conferencing solution. Will you need one for personal communication or business meetings? How large is your team? How much can you spend on digital solutions for corporate use?

We recommend to brainstorm use cases for your ideal virtual meetings software or even write them down. That way, youll be able to check whether theyre possible in Zoom or Jitsi.

Lets face it: Jitsi is not enough for large enterprises. Free and open-source, it only has basic tools and capabilities. Still, its a perfect fit for personal group conversations, non-profits, education, free webinars. If youre not a big company, Jitsi will cover most of your demands for video conferencing application.

Zoom is awesome and user-friendly, almost 100% suitable for corporate use in any business, especially large enterprises. Hundreds of attendees, unlimited whiteboards and session duration, numerous third-party plugins. The biggest deal-breaker is cost, which can be too high for some companies. Meanwhile, there are many paid Zoom alternatives with more attractive price tags.

Read more:
Zoom vs Jitsi for video conferencing? | ONLYOFFICE Blog

Posted in Jitsi | Comments Off on Zoom vs Jitsi for video conferencing? | ONLYOFFICE Blog

Will WM Technology Inc (MAPS) Stay at the Top of the Technology Sector? – InvestorsObserver

Posted: at 5:15 am

Will WM Technology Inc (MAPS) Stay at the Top of the Technology Sector?  InvestorsObserver

Read more here:

Will WM Technology Inc (MAPS) Stay at the Top of the Technology Sector? - InvestorsObserver

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Will WM Technology Inc (MAPS) Stay at the Top of the Technology Sector? – InvestorsObserver

Brexit | Meaning, Referendum, Date, & Consequences | Britannica

Posted: at 5:14 am

Brexit, the United Kingdoms withdrawal from the European Union (EU), which formally occurred on January 31, 2020. The term Brexit is a portmanteau coined as shorthand for British exit. In a referendum held on June 23, 2016, some 52 percent of those British voters who participated opted to leave the EU, setting the stage for the U.K. to become the first country ever to do so. The details of the separation were negotiated for more than two years following the submission of Britains formal request to leave in March 2017, and British Prime Minister Theresa May, whose legacy is inextricably bound to Brexit, was forced to resign in July 2019 after she repeatedly failed to win approval from Parliament for the separation agreement that she had negotiated with the EU. Ultimately, Brexit was accomplished under her successor, Boris Johnson.

In 2013, responding to growing Euroskepticism within his Conservative Party, British Prime Minister David Cameron first pledged to conduct a referendum on whether the U.K. should remain in the EU. Even before the surge of immigration in 2015 that resulted from upheaval in the Middle East and Africa, many Britons had become distressed with the influx of migrants from elsewhere in the EU who had arrived through the EUs open borders. Exploiting this anti-immigrant sentiment, the Nigel Farage-led nationalist United Kingdom Independence Party made big gains in elections largely at the expense of the Conservatives. Euroskeptics in Britain were also alarmed by British financial obligations that had come about as a result of the EUs response to the euro-zone debt crisis and the bailout of Greece (200912). They argued that Britain had relinquished too much of its sovereignty. Moreover, they were fed up with what they saw as excessive EU regulations on consumers, employers, and the environment.

The Labour and Liberal Democratic parties generally favoured remaining within the EU, and there were still many Conservatives, Cameron among them, who remained committed to British membership, provided that a minimum of reforms could be secured from the U.K.s 27 partners in the EU. Having triumphed in the 2015 U.K. general election, Cameron prepared to make good on his promise to hold a referendum on EU membership before 2017, but first he sought to win concessions from the European Council that would address some of the concerns of those Britons who wanted out of the EU (an undertaking Cameron characterized as Mission Possible). In February 2016 EU leaders agreed to comply with a number of Camerons requests, including, notably, allowing the U.K. to limit benefits for migrant workers during their first four years in Britain, though this so-called emergency brake could be applied only for seven years. Britain also was to be exempt from the EUs ever-closer union commitment, was permitted to maintain the pound sterling as its currency, and was reimbursed for money spent on euro-zone bailouts.

With that agreement in hand, Cameron scheduled the referendum for June 2016 and took the lead in the remain campaign, which focused on an organization called Britain Stronger in Europe and argued for the benefits of participation in the EUs single market. The leave effort, which coalesced around the Vote Leave campaign, was headed up by ex-London mayor Boris Johnson, who was widely seen as a challenger for Camerons leadership of the Conservative Party. Johnson repeatedly claimed that the EU had changed out of all recognition from the common market that Britain had joined in 1973, and Leavers argued that EU membership prevented Britain from negotiating advantageous trade deals. Both sides made gloom-and-doom proclamations regarding the consequences that would result from their opponents triumph, and both sides lined up expert testimony and studies supporting their visions. They also racked up celebrity endorsements that ranged from the powerful (U.S. Pres. Barack Obama, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and International Monetary Fund managing director Christine Lagarde on the remain side and former British foreign minister Lord David Owen and Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump on the leave side) to the glamorous (actors Benedict Cumberbatch and Sir Patrick Stewart backing the remain effort and actor Sir Michael Caine and former cricket star Ian Botham being in the leave ranks).

Opinion polling on the eve of the referendum showed both sides of the Brexit question fairly evenly divided, but, when the votes were tallied, some 52 percent of those who voted had chosen to leave the EU. Cameron resigned in order to allow his successor to conduct the negotiations on the British departure. In announcing his resignation, he said, I dont think it would be right for me to try to be the captain that steers our country to its next destination.

Although Johnson had appeared to be poised to replace Cameron, as events played out, Home Secretary Theresa May became the new leader of the Conservative Party and prime minister in July 2016. May, who had opposed Brexit, came into office promising to see it to completion, On March 29, 2017, she formally submitted a six-page letter to European Council Pres. Donald Tusk invoking article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, thus opening a two-year window for negotiations between the U.K. and the EU over the details of separation. In the letter, May pledged to enter the discussions constructively and respectfully, in a spirit of sincere cooperation. She also hoped that a bold and ambitious Free Trade Agreement would result from the negotiations.

Attempting to secure a mandate for her vision of Brexit, May called a snap election for Parliament for June 2017. Instead of gaining a stronger hand for the Brexit negotiations, however, she saw her Conservative Party lose its governing majority in the House of Commons and become dependent on confidence and supply support from Northern Irelands Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). Mays objective of arriving at a cohesive approach for her governments Brexit negotiations was further complicated by the wide disagreement that persisted within the Conservative Party both on details related to the British proposal for separation and on the broader issues involved.

Despite forceful opposition by hard Brexiters, a consensus on the nuts and bolts of the governments Brexit plan appeared to emerge from a marathon meeting of the cabinet in July at Chequers, the prime ministers country retreat. The working document produced by that meeting committed Britain to ongoing harmonization with EU rules and called for the creation of a joint institutional framework under which agreements between the U.K. and the EU would be handled in the U.K. by British courts and in the EU by EU courts. Although the proposal mandated that Britain would regain control over how many people could enter the country, it also outlined a mobility framework that would permit British and EU citizens to apply for work and for study in each others territories. Mays softer approach, grounded in policies aimed at preserving economic ties with the EU, looked to have won the day, but in short order the governments apparent harmony was disrupted by the resignations of Britains chief Brexit negotiator, David Davis (who complained that Mays plan gave up too much, too easily), and foreign secretary Johnson, who wrote in his letter of resignation that the dream of Brexit was being suffocated by needless self-doubt. Confronted with the possibility of a vote of confidence on her leadership of the Conservative Party, May reportedly warned fellow Tories to back her Brexit plan or risk handing power to a Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour government.

In November the leaders of the EUs other member countries formally agreed to the terms of a withdrawal deal (the Chequers plan) that May claimed delivered for the British people and set the United Kingdom on course for a prosperous future. Under the plan Britain was to satisfy its long-term financial obligations by paying some $50 billion to the EU. Britains departure from the EU was set for March 29, 2019, but, according to the agreement, the U.K. would continue to abide by EU rules and regulations until at least December 2020 while negotiations continued on the details of the long-term relationship between the EU and the U.K.

The agreement, which was scheduled for debate by the House of Commons in December, still faced strong opposition in Parliament, not only from Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and the DUP but also from many Conservatives. Meanwhile, a call for a new referendum on Brexit was gaining traction, but May adamantly refused to consider that option, countering that the British people had already expressed their will. The principal stumbling block for many of the agreements opponents was the so-called Northern Ireland backstop plan, which sought to preserve the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement by maintaining an open border between Northern Ireland and EU member Ireland after Brexit. The backstop plan called for a legally binding customs arrangement between the EU and Northern Ireland to go into effect should the U.K. and the EU not reach a long-term agreement by December 2020. Opponents of the backstop were concerned that it created the possibility of effectively establishing a customs border down the Irish Sea by setting up regulatory barriers between Northern Ireland and the rest of the U.K.

The issue came to the fore in the first week of December, when the government was forced to publish in full Attorney General Geoffrey Coxs legal advice for the government on the Brexit agreement. In Coxs opinion, without agreement between the U.K. and the EU, the terms of the backstop plan could persist indefinitely, leaving Britain legally prevented from ending the agreement absent EU approval. This controversial issue loomed large as the House of Commons undertook five days of debate in advance of a vote on the Brexit agreement scheduled for December 11. With a humiliating rejection of the agreement by the House of Commons likely, on December 10 May chose to dramatically interrupt the debate after three days and postpone the vote, promising to pursue new assurances from the EU regarding the backstop. The opposition responded by threatening to hold a vote of confidence and to call for an early election, but a more immediate threat to Mays version of Brexit came when a hard-line Brexit faction within the Conservative Party forced a vote on her leadership. Needing the votes of 159 MPs to survive as leader, May received 200, and, under Conservative Party rules, she could not be challenged as party leader for another year.

The longer it remained unsettled, the more the matter of Brexit became the defining issue of British politics. With opinions on Mays version of Brexit and on Brexit in general crossing ideological lines, both Labour and the Conservatives were roiling with internecine conflict.

In pursuit of greater support in Parliament for her revised Brexit plan, May secured new promises of cooperation on the backstop plan from EU leaders. Agreement was reached on a joint legally binding instrument under which Britain could initiate a formal dispute with the EU if the EU were to attempt to keep Britain bound to the backstop plan indefinitely. Another joint statement committed the U.K. and the EU to arriving at a replacement for the backstop plan by December 2020. Moreover, a unilateral declaration by Mays government stressed that there was nothing to prevent the U.K. from abandoning the backstop should negotiations on an alternative arrangement with the EU collapse without the likelihood of resolution. According to Attorney General Cox, the new assurances reduced the risk of the U.K.s being indefinitely confined by the backstop agreement, but they did not fundamentally change the agreements legal status.

On March 12 the House of Commons again rejected Mays plan (391242), and the next day it voted 312308 against a no-deal Brexitthat is, leaving the EU without a deal in place. On March 14 May barely survived a vote that would have robbed her of control of Brexit and given it to Parliament. On March 20 she asked the EU to extend the deadline for Britains departure to June 30. The EU responded by delaying the Brexit deadline until May 22 but only if Parliament had accepted Mays withdrawal plan by the week of March 24.

In the meantime, on March 23 hundreds of thousands of demonstrators filled the streets of London demanding that another referendum on Brexit be held. On March 25 the House of Commons voted 329302 to take control of Parliaments agenda from the government so as to conduct indicative votes on alternative proposals to Mays plan. Eight of those proposals were voted upon on March 27. None of them gained majority support, though a plan that sought to create a permanent and comprehensive U.K.-wide customs union with the EU came within six votes of success. That same day May announced that she would resign as party leader and prime minister if the House of Commons were to approve her plan. On March 29 Speaker of the House John Bercow invoked a procedural rule that limited that days vote to the withdrawal agreement portion of Mays plan (thus excluding the political declaration that addressed the U.K. and EUs long-term relationship). This time the vote was closer than previous votes had been (286 in support and 344 in opposition), but the plan still went down in defeat.

Time was running out. By April 12 the U.K. had to decide whether it would leave the EU without an agreement on that day or request a longer delay that would require it to participate in elections for the European Parliament. May asked the EU to extend the deadline for Brexit until June 30, and on April 11 the European Council granted the U.K. a flexible extension until October 31.

After failing to win sufficient support from Conservatives for her Brexit plan, May entered discussions with Labour leaders on a possible compromise, but these efforts also came up empty. May responded by proposing a new version of the plan that included a temporary customs relationship with the EU and a promise to hold a parliamentary vote on whether another referendum on Brexit should be staged. Her cabinet revolted, and on May 24 May announced that she would step down as party leader on June 7 but would remain as caretaker premier until the Conservatives had chosen her successor.

Mays successor as party leader and prime minister, Boris Johnson, promised to remove the U.K. from the EU without an exit agreement if the deal May had negotiated was not altered to his satisfaction; however, he faced broad opposition (even among Conservatives) to his advocacy of a no-deal Brexit. Johnsons political maneuvering (including proroguing Parliament just weeks before the revised October 31 departure deadline) was strongly countered by legislative measures advanced by those opposed to leaving the EU without an agreement in place. In early September a vote of the House of Commons forced the new prime minister to request a delay of the British withdrawal from the EU until January 31, 2020, despite the fact that on October 22 the House approved, in principle, the agreement that Johnson had negotiated, which replaced the backstop with the so-called Northern Ireland Protocol, a plan to keep Northern Ireland aligned with the EU for at least four years from the end of the transition period.

In search of a mandate for his vision of Brexit, Johnson tried and failed several times to call a snap election. Because the election would fall outside the five-year term stipulated by the Fixed Terms of Parliament Act, Johnson needed opposition support to achieve the approval of two-thirds of the House of Commons required for the election to be held. Finally, after the possibility of no-deal Brexit was blocked, Labour leader Corbyn agreed to allow British voters once again to decide the fate of Brexit. In the election, held on December 12, 2019, the Conservatives recorded their most decisive victory since 1987, adding 48 seats to secure a solid Parliamentary majority of 365 seats and setting the stage for the realization of a Johnson-style Brexit. At 11:00 pm London time on January 31, the United Kingdom formally withdrew from the European Union. The freedom to work and move freely between the U.K. and the EU became a thing of the past.

Although Britains formal departure from the EU was completed, final details relating to a new trade deal between the U.K. and the EU remained to be resolved. On December 24, 2020, the December 31 deadline for that resolution was only barely met. The resultant 2,000-page agreement clarified that there would be no limits or taxes on goods sold between U.K. and EU parties; however, an extensive regimen of paperwork for such transactions and transport of goods was put in place.

In June 2022 Johnson sought to jettison part of the trade agreement, introducing legislation in Parliament that would remove checks on goods entering Northern Ireland from elsewhere in the U.K. The Johnson government averred that overly stringent application of the customs rules by the EU was undermining business and threatening peace in Northern Ireland. Unionists had complained that these customs checks were jeopardizing Northern Irelands relationship with the rest of the U.K., and the DUP refused to re-enter Northern Irelands power-sharing executive until the checks were eliminated. Opponents of Johnsons action, including May, argued that the move was illegal, and the EU threatened retaliation.

Originally posted here:

Brexit | Meaning, Referendum, Date, & Consequences | Britannica

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on Brexit | Meaning, Referendum, Date, & Consequences | Britannica

Brexit: What can we expect from an NI Protocol deal? – BBC

Posted: at 5:14 am

  1. Brexit: What can we expect from an NI Protocol deal?  BBC
  2. Why are the U.K. and E.U. still fighting over Brexit and Northern Ireland?  The Washington Post
  3. Sunak facing threat of Tory rebellion over Northern Ireland protocol plans  The Guardian

See the rest here:

Brexit: What can we expect from an NI Protocol deal? - BBC

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on Brexit: What can we expect from an NI Protocol deal? – BBC

If men become too feminine theres going to be a problem: Vincent Cassel on violence, Brexit and Andrew Tate – The Guardian

Posted: at 5:14 am

If men become too feminine theres going to be a problem: Vincent Cassel on violence, Brexit and Andrew Tate  The Guardian

View original post here:

If men become too feminine theres going to be a problem: Vincent Cassel on violence, Brexit and Andrew Tate - The Guardian

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on If men become too feminine theres going to be a problem: Vincent Cassel on violence, Brexit and Andrew Tate – The Guardian

How debt-for-nature swaps successfully finance UNESCO World Heritage conservation in Belize and Seychelles – EIN News

Posted: at 5:13 am

How debt-for-nature swaps successfully finance UNESCO World Heritage conservation in Belize and Seychelles  EIN News

See more here:

How debt-for-nature swaps successfully finance UNESCO World Heritage conservation in Belize and Seychelles - EIN News

Posted in Seychelles | Comments Off on How debt-for-nature swaps successfully finance UNESCO World Heritage conservation in Belize and Seychelles – EIN News

‘Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey’ director shares details from the ‘unfilmable’ first draft of his bonkers horror movie – Yahoo Entertainment

Posted: at 5:13 am

'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' director shares details from the 'unfilmable' first draft of his bonkers horror movie  Yahoo Entertainment

Here is the original post:

'Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey' director shares details from the 'unfilmable' first draft of his bonkers horror movie - Yahoo Entertainment

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on ‘Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey’ director shares details from the ‘unfilmable’ first draft of his bonkers horror movie – Yahoo Entertainment

My party of 2 spent $210 to decorate a Mickey Mouse cake at Disney World. It was worth it for the mimosas and desserts alone. – Yahoo Life

Posted: at 5:13 am

My party of 2 spent $210 to decorate a Mickey Mouse cake at Disney World. It was worth it for the mimosas and desserts alone.  Yahoo Life

Read more here:

My party of 2 spent $210 to decorate a Mickey Mouse cake at Disney World. It was worth it for the mimosas and desserts alone. - Yahoo Life

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on My party of 2 spent $210 to decorate a Mickey Mouse cake at Disney World. It was worth it for the mimosas and desserts alone. – Yahoo Life