Monthly Archives: January 2023

2023 is going to witness a surge in technology courses top courses that will remain in vogue – Times of India

Posted: January 22, 2023 at 12:29 am

2023 is going to witness a surge in technology courses top courses that will remain in vogue  Times of India

View post:
2023 is going to witness a surge in technology courses top courses that will remain in vogue - Times of India

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on 2023 is going to witness a surge in technology courses top courses that will remain in vogue – Times of India

M.R.S. Rao birthday: All you need to know about the Padma Shri winning Indian scientist – Free Press Journal

Posted: at 12:29 am

M.R.S. Rao birthday: All you need to know about the Padma Shri winning Indian scientist  Free Press Journal

Read more:
M.R.S. Rao birthday: All you need to know about the Padma Shri winning Indian scientist - Free Press Journal

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on M.R.S. Rao birthday: All you need to know about the Padma Shri winning Indian scientist – Free Press Journal

Donald Trump Is Being Ordered to Pay $1 Million in a Lawsuit …

Posted: at 12:23 am

Donald Trump is seeing the tide turn on some of his actions and behaviors. A federal judge in Florida is making him face monetary consequences for a lawsuit he brought against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, and other party leaders who he claimed tried to hurt him in the 2016 election by leaking information about his ties to Russia.

The ruling calls out the former president for weaponizing the legal system against his perceived enemies and U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks was not happy. This case should never have been brought, the judge wrote, via The New York Times. Its inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start. No reasonable lawyer would have filed it. Intended for a political purpose, none of the counts of the amended complaint stated a cognizable legal claim.

More from SheKnows

It doesnt sound like Judge Middlebrooks is much of a fan of Donald Trumps antics at all because he called him a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries. He didnt stop there either, adding, He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer. He knew full well the impact of his actions.

He believes that Donald Trump needlessly harmed the 31 people and organizations who were named in the suit. As a result, the former president, his lawyer, Alina Habba, and her firm, Habba Madaio & Associates, are to pay $937,989.39 in sanctions for wasting everyones time. It also points out the falsehoods behind Donald Trumps absurd conspiracy theories something he leaned into heavily with his voter base. Donald Trump has not responded to the case yet, but it adds another wrinkle to his ongoing legal struggles while he tries to run for president for the third time.

Story continues

Click here to read the full article.

Before you go, click here to see the most important celebrity lawsuits over the past 15 years.

Kelly Clarkson

Launch Gallery: 16 Photos of Bill Clinton & Hillary Clintons Family of Three Over the Years

Best of SheKnows

Sign up for SheKnows' Newsletter.For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Read more here:

Donald Trump Is Being Ordered to Pay $1 Million in a Lawsuit ...

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Donald Trump Is Being Ordered to Pay $1 Million in a Lawsuit …

Could Trump Run to DeSantis’s Left in 2024? – New York Magazine

Posted: at 12:23 am

  1. Could Trump Run to DeSantis's Left in 2024?  New York Magazine
  2. Trump Is Plotting How to Kick DeSantis In the Nuts. Heres His Playbook, So Far  Rolling Stone
  3. Trump is heavy favorite in GOP 2024 primary: poll  The Hill

Read the rest here:

Could Trump Run to DeSantis's Left in 2024? - New York Magazine

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Could Trump Run to DeSantis’s Left in 2024? – New York Magazine

‘Why Don’t You Want Kids?’ ‘Because Apocalypse!’ | WIRED

Posted: at 12:16 am

This story is part of a week-long series on reproduction, from prenatal testing to male birth control.

Are you pregnant yet? Dont you like kids? Well, its different when its your own child. Being a parent is the most important job in the world. Youre being a bit selfish. What if your parents had decided not to have you? Speaking of your parents, isnt it cruel to deny them the joy of grandchildren? Besides, who will take care of you when you get old? Youre just saying that because youre young. Youll change your mind. Your biological clock is ticking! What if your kid cured cancer?

If you dont have kids and dont want them, apologies: Youve heard this all before from well-meaning relatives, friends, coworkers, cashiers, taxi drivers, crossing guards. If you do have kids and youve said anything like the above, the childfree community would like to let you know that youre not being as thoughtful and caring as you (maybe) mean to be.

See, all of those questions and statements are forbidden by the bylaws of popular subreddit r/childfree, where theyre known as bingos: clich phrases parents say in an effort to convince the childfree that their decision is wrong, and that they are shirking their societal duty by not reproducing. The subreddit is a forum to vent about being antagonized by mombies and daddicts. More importantly, its a place for users to speak openly about choice, offer stories and support to others, and share advice about how to respond to bingos or convince doctors to sterilize them.

By now, some of you might be forming a hard nugget of disapproval for the snarky childfree redditors. Youre far from alone: Multiple sociological studies have found that voluntary childlessness often sparks immediate disdain and moral outrage, even from total strangers. The stigma knows no race, religion, gender, or border. Researchers have found similar negative judgements of childfree adults everywhere from India to Italy to Israel. (If youre having trouble imagining the hostility, try typing childlessor even better, childless millennialinto Google.)

Still, fertility rates in the United States (and everywhere else) continue to drop. And contrary to certain hypotheses, voluntarily childfree people seem to rarely regret their choice. r/childfree has nearly half a million subscribers, and similar communities exist on just about every social media platform.

For the childfree, the reasons to consider childfreedom extend beyond baby hatred, questions of bodily autonomy, or suboptimal finances. Concerns go broader, ranging from the economy to politics to climate. We basically have 12 years until the planet is an apocalyptic hellscape, says Justine, a longtime r/childfree member in her early thirties. We aren't as lucky as our parents, and they seem to have no idea how much more difficult it is to get by for us than it was for them.

When responding to crusading parents who might try to convince them out of their stance, many childfree people use prepared scripts, formed by years of entertaining the same inquiries. They know theyre working against ingrained biases: The childfree are keenly aware that they are prefigured in the eyes of most as a band of entitled, disrespectful millennials, trading tradition for self-interest.

Continued here:

'Why Don't You Want Kids?' 'Because Apocalypse!' | WIRED

Posted in Childfree | Comments Off on ‘Why Don’t You Want Kids?’ ‘Because Apocalypse!’ | WIRED

Whether youre childless or childfree, you shouldnt have to talk …

Posted: at 12:16 am

In recent years, Ive heard members of the older generation complain that it is no longer considered acceptable to ask a younger person whether or not they have children. Its true that this isnt polite, especially during small talk with a stranger. They may as well be saying: So, tell me all about the inner workings of your/your partners uterus.

Personally, I used to dread this question, even more so when it was framed as, Do you have a family? Of course I do, I just havent birthed any of them. Peoples feelings on procreation are often complicated, sometimes painful, and always deeply personal. In the context of increasing panic about the birthrate, the question of having children or not, as it may be is even more loaded, because it intersects with so many other factors in our lives: health, finances, employment status, gender or sexuality, housing, relationship status, and so on. These are not things you necessarily want to delve into over the course of a casual conversation.

Or, perhaps revolutionary as it might sound you simply dont want to have children, and its your right to not want to discuss that or be interrogated about that.

The fact that the word childless seems to be going out of fashion is largely to be celebrated. It positions having a child as the default, and has the power to be intensely wounding. As a word, it carries with it a feeling of lacking, when that is certainly not everyones experience. This stigma is why the term childfree is increasingly becoming the default in media reporting after being popularised on internet messageboards in recent years.

I was interested in how people without children may feel about that, so Ive been asking them on- and offline whether they see the use of childfree as an improvement. People who had chosen not to have children generally preferred to be referred to as childfree, but those whose childlessness was involuntary, due to infertility, bereavement or life circumstances, felt erased by it. Many complained that both terms positioned having children as the default, when it shouldnt be (Im just a woman living life, said one respondent). Why define by deficit? Indeed, Id say the overwhelming majority disliked both words, with one being seen as stigmatising and the other gleeful and nasty in its implication that parents somehow need liberating.

Others took issue with the term childfree because it has become the chosen moniker for an online community with a too often misogynistic undercurrent, according to several I spoke to. I checked out a few subreddits, and luckily my skin is as thick as rhinos hide after more than a decade of newspaper journalism, because some of what I read was pretty unpleasant, including several threads about people finding pregnant women disgusting and how looking at them makes them feel sick. Sobering reading for someone who was pregnant at the time.

After reading these forums, and then cleansing my palate with several videos of babies and kittens interacting, I can understand why a person without children may not want to be associated with a community that often expresses strong dislike, even hate, for children and their parents. I can understand why communities for those who have difficult feelings about pregnancy (including phobias) need to exist, but some comments were profoundly misogynistic.

After all, we are all part of a collective and a community, and not having your own children doesnt mean that your life is childfree, and that the people you love havent made a different choice to your own. There are many ways to care for children, from being an uncle or godparent to fostering, step-parenting, volunteering or working with them. Perhaps we need to focus less on the act of having a child and more on the act of parenting.

Theres also the fact that, for many people, including myself before I became a mother, we are neither childless nor childfree, but hover somewhere in between or oscillate between the two. I have had days where I have spent time with a baby and felt desperately, profoundly childless, only to take to the dancefloor that evening after a dangerous fourth martini and feel blissfully, hedonistically childfree. Perhaps thats one reason why when absolutely necessarily doesnt have children is the kindest, most neutral descriptor we can hope for. Though we can also hope to be moving away from ones parenting status needing to be defined at all, especially for women, who still face this question far more frequently than men. Language matters, and as ever it often says more about us and our assumptions than we realise.

What is working: My response to the mother of all impertinent of questions has often proved very effective, so I thought I might share it here. Thats a very personal question, I reply, looking the querent dead in the eye. It usually has the desired effect.

What isnt: At risk of causing paroxysms of revulsion among the childfree Reddit community from being forced to imagine the following scene, I had the most appalling bath while heavily pregnant: lukewarm, as medically recommended (I used my husbands homebrew thermometer to check it was below 37C). The baby first kicked to the Adagietto in Mahlers Fifth, so I thought Id try the whole symphony, not realising how bellicose and bombastic it was. Are you OK in there? my husband asked, as I sat in a cold bath listening to a cacophony of trumpets. You sound like you should be piloting a spitfire.

See the rest here:

Whether youre childless or childfree, you shouldnt have to talk ...

Posted in Childfree | Comments Off on Whether youre childless or childfree, you shouldnt have to talk …

Reddit’s Childfree Community Has a Parent-Shaming Problem – The Daily Dot

Posted: at 12:16 am

I was eight years old the first time someone disparaged me for not wanting children.

I was surrounded by my cabinmates at church camp, each of them excitedly describing the names, personalities, genders, and number of kids they dreamt of. I shrugged when it was my turn to talk. Kids werent really on my to-do list, I said. Thats when an adult male staffer chimed in.

You should be ashamed to say you dont want kids, he told me. Thats Gods biological purpose for a womans existence.

The room went silent. My cheeks flushed. I laughed uncomfortably. Youre probably right, I said, anxious to direct everyones attention away from me. Even then, though, some part of me wondered why a thirty-something-year-old man thought it was acceptable to express his views about a little girls future reproductive choices.

But his unsolicited opinion would be one of many more to come. My unwavering stance against having kids has been met again and again with varying levels of condescension, scandalized horror, and everything in between.

Imagine, then, my delight over a decade later upon recently stumbling across r/childfree, a subreddit dedicated to those who do not have and do not ever want children (whether biological, adopted, or otherwise).

After a quick skim, it seemed that r/childfree would rapidly become one of my favorite subreddits. I saw a post from an 85-year-old widow sharing how she lived a long, fulfilling, and childfree life. Another celebrated Jennifer Aniston for standing up for not wanting kids. One r/childfree member posted a victorious selfie after having her tubes removed, followed by many uplifting comments. There were a lot of jokes about having financial freedom, all harmless.

A deeper examination, however, uncovered an unsettling amount of vitriol toward parents and children alike, despite the subreddits rule against jokes/making fun of violence/harm towards kids. Some of the subreddits unique slang is especially dehumanizingmembers frequently call parents breeders (dads are also daddicts and moms are mombies), and kids are often referred to as crotch-goblins or fuck trophies, thus giving off the impression that some members of r/childfree are enraged by the mere existence of children.

While r/childfree moderators have even made sure to clarify the proper use of this slang in the subreddits FAQ, casual members seem to use it liberally, regardless of context. For example, the FAQ deliberately makes a distinction between entitled parents (breeders) and responsible parents (PNB, parents, not breeders).

However, r/childfree members seem to use the derogatory terms far more often than acronyms like PNB. While the subreddit is primarily a space for venting rather than for praise, the scathing language is still jarring.

SailorMercure, who has moderated r/childfree on and off since August of 2015, defended the subreddits widely used terms. They called the slang innocuous, pointing out that the language is not used in real life and is merely shorthand for terrible people.

Just like other rant-based subreddits call wrongdoers names, we call bad parents and ill-raised children names as well, SailorMercure told the Daily Dot. The same way a cashier wouldnt call a tyrannic customer an old bat to their face because it is rude and hurtful but would rant on r/TalesFromRetail, people dont call bad moms mombies to their face as well but they will do so on r/childfree.

Language aside, r/childfree members also frequently criticize low-income or mentally or physically ill people who choose to have children. These judgments on who should or shouldnt have children alarmingly resemble the ideas of eugenics, or selective breeding (and sterilization) of certain populations for a favored genetic composition.

After a bit of digging, I realized I wasnt the only one put off by this rhetoric.

One redditor even broached the controversy by posting in r/childfree itself; another sparked a site-wide debate on the contention surrounding the subreddit. While some debate participants argued the harmlessness of ranting about annoying parents and children, most emphasized the danger of negative attitudes toward families. Many redditors also linked some r/childfrees more aggressive posts and comments.

These problems have spurred active r/childfree members to distance themselves from the subreddit in the last five to six years. One such redditor, user borborborbor, had joined r/childfree after years of seeking medical sterilization, during which shed been dismissed and condescended to repeatedly.

It took years of doctors to get the tubal approved, borborborbor told the Daily Dot. I left a few visits so angry, so disappointed, that I would be quietly, uncontrollably crying as I walked homeThen, I stumbled on [r/childfree] when I was looking for like-minded people. In the early days of my involvement there, Id mostly just weigh in with support on peoples posts when they were in similar situations to me. Wed encourage each other.

Even though borborborbor initially found solace in r/childfree, the tone of the subreddit gradually transformed before her eyes.

Childfree was a place that felt more driven by women, at least at first, borborborbor said. But more and more, men were posting, hoisting up this flag of childfree as some sort of better-than-thou rally call. The comments on [these posts] quickly devolved into people flaunting how much better they were than their friends who had kids.

Another redditor, Jes, was an enthusiastic member of r/childfree until they realized theyd gotten swept up in the subreddits culture.

I think what pulled me in was the colorful stories of the poster having a horrid experience involving some mombie and her menagerie of unruly crotch goblins, Jes told the Daily Dot. I went from Huh, it does sound like it sucks to have kids to Goddammit, why are these children in Walmart existing near me? I admit I absorbed a lot of those ways of thinking and began to express those same attitudes.

Jes ended up abandoning r/childfree after being called out for such rhetoric, and says they have since grown to develop less aggressive views on parents and children.

There was a couple who were trying to raise money to adopt a kid, and I said some pretty asshole-ish and unfair things, Jes said. My thought being, Why the hell would you try to have kids if you cant afford it? Lets just say I was promptly schooled in why I was being a dick. It took a lot of wound licking before What did I do wrong? became Wow, I was an asshole.

Many r/childfree enthusiasts are aware of the criticism frequently leveled at the subreddit but defend their right to express their beliefs, pointing out the cathartic nature of ranting.

Im not going to pretend this sub doesnt have its share of assholes, active r/childfree member sleepykelvina told the Daily Dot. But I think a lot of people look at r/childfree and just see a lot of angry, frustrated people complaining about kids and parenthood and just stop there. What they dont realize is that this subreddit is a safe space to talk about all the cultural baggage that comes with being childfree. Youre getting this ultra-condensed dose of kvetching about kids because its one of the few places you can express those views.

Sleepykelvina also pointed out that while r/childfrees less palatable posts garner significant attention, members often genuinely help those who flock to their online community.

Weve had mothers with postpartum depression come to our subreddit, spilling their guts about how they cant bond with their babies, sleepykelvina said. We end up counseling people contemplating leaving their partners because the other person just assumed they would change their mind about kids. A lot of these people need to be in therapy, but you cant even count on getting a therapist who wont judge you for being childfree.

Many r/childfree members seem to identify as part of a marginalized group for facing such judgment. Its not that childfree women dont frequently deal with microaggressions ranging from pithy guilt trips (Dont you want to give your parents grandchildren?), to pressure from non-childfree partners, to the occasional difficulty with finding part-time work accommodations. A 2016 study found that most people still take moral offense at the childfree lifestyles infringement of social norms. I can attest that this enduring social stigma is demoralizing, tiring, and fundamentally hurtful.

However, the childfree community is not at a systemic disadvantage because of its chosen lifestyle. On the contrary, were actually spared the endless struggles of women who are pregnant or have had children.

Injustice toward non-childfree women is so pervasive, there are multiple terms for it: pregnancy discrimination and family responsibilities/caregiver discrimination. Furthermore, a recent study showed that the gender wage gap is less a result of gender discrimination and more of a penalty for having children. The study estimates that this child penalty accounts for 80% of the wage gap, costing mothers a large chunk of their livelihoods and lending a whole new meaning to the phrase mommy tax. Pregnant women experience more hostility, are offered less raises and promotions, and are more likely to be fired.

Things are even worse for non-white women. While women of color certainly face an inordinate amount of cultural and familial pressure to have children, theyve also been historically targeted by the U.S. governments many bouts of forced sterilizationmaking r/childfrees questionable discourse regarding who is fit to reproduce all the more distasteful. Black and Indigenous women especially suffered from these eugenics programs, making the act of giving birth a personally radical one for many Black and Brown women.

In the end, the misogyny childfree and non-childfree women experience isnt a contest; both sets of experiences are valid. For this reason, the existence of childfree platforms are not only justified but necessary.

Enter r/truechildfree, a more positive childfree community that, exists as an alternative to r/childfree and is filled with relevant informative links, advice threads, and wholesome conversations about living childfree. Several members migrated from r/childfree to this smaller community, finding that r/truechildfree is, as its moderator ClassyAnalViolator told the Daily Dot, a pleasant place that [doesnt] have name-calling or shaming or other hateful/hurtful things.

Unfortunately, r/truechildfree isnt quite as active as r/childfree, but other childfree communities do exist online. The Childfree Pubhosts everything from casual discussions to rants. NotMom.com offers several resources for childfree people in addition to a childfree discussion forum. Childfree, an open Facebook group, houses over 8,000 childfree people who share childfree stories, memes, and more. Most of these communities have links to even more childfree groups and sites, so theres no shortage of choices online.

However, if a bustling Reddit community is ultimately what you want, SailorMercure did point out that r/childfree gives redditors the option to opt out of all the rants and instead focus on the subreddits encouraging and educational content.

One click on the NO RANT or NO BRANT button, and everything that makes the sub an easy target for generalized disdain and contempt disappears, SailorMercure said. It becomes evident why the sub exists: to support, to comfort, to inform, and to share with like-minded people who are part of a social minority.

Despite its problems, the online childfree community is as diverse as it is largely beneficial, helping to remove the stigma against choosing not to have kids. After all, if more non-childfree folks were familiar with the movement, maybe I wouldnt have had to receive the first stamp on my childfree Bingo card at the tender age of eight.

Read more:

Go here to see the original:

Reddit's Childfree Community Has a Parent-Shaming Problem - The Daily Dot

Posted in Childfree | Comments Off on Reddit’s Childfree Community Has a Parent-Shaming Problem – The Daily Dot

Nikolas Badminton | Futurist Speaker | Futurist Keynotes | Futurist.com

Posted: at 12:09 am

Glen Hiemstra is the founder andFuturist Emeritusof Futurist.com.

Glen is dedicated to disseminating information about the future to assist individuals, organizations, and industries in effective strategic planning. An internationally respected expert on future trends, long-range planning and creating the preferred future, Glen has advised professional, business, and governmental organizations for three decades and has served as a technical advisor for futuristic television programs. Audience members for Glens keynote speeches and clients for his long-range planning say things like, Once you hear Glen Hiemstra speak, the future will never look the same.

A writer as well as a speaker and consultant, Glen is the author of Millennial City: How a New Generation Can Save the Future,Turning the Future into Revenue: What Businesses and Individuals Need to Know to Shape Their Future. Previously he co-authoredStrategic Leadership: Achieving Your Preferred Future.

Glen has worked with many leading companies, government agencies and organizations across a wide variety of domains. These include Microsoft, The Home Depot, Boeing, Adobe, Ernst & Young, PaineWebber, ShareBuilder, Ambrosetti (Italy), Club of Amsterdam, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pacific Ocean Division, Northern Telecom, REI, Weyerhaeuser, Hewlett Packard, Novo Nordisk, U.S./Mexico JWC, APAX Partners, Costa Rica Hotel Association, Atlanta 2060, Tulsa 2025, Idaho Transportation 2030, Michigan DOT 2030, Federal Highway Administration Advanced Research, Eddie Bauer, Procter & Gamble, ACE Hardware, IHOP, John Deere, Weitz Construction, Lexis Nexus, Land O Lakes, GHD Engineering (Australia), SONAE (Portugal), and others.

As a recognized expert in preferred future planning, Glen is a popular keynote speaker who can zero in on emerging trends in economics, demographics, energy, the environment, Internet and communications, science, technology, housing, and transportation. Glen goes beyond simple trend analysis to discuss the opportunities that we all have to shape the preferred future. In his consulting, Glen utilizes tools such as environmental scanning, scenario development, whole systems perspectives, paradigm shifts, and analysis of organizational culture for managing change to assist enterprises to achieve high performance.

A skilled communicator, Glen also offers a variety of informational resources for those interested in exploring the future. Each month visitors from 120 nations come to Futurist.com and the blog for provocative snapshots of emerging ideas, trends, and technologies.

As a media technical advisor Glen has worked on several television productions, including with Steven Bochco Productions (creator of Hill Street Blues and NYPD Blue), among others. He has oft beencited in publicationssuch as The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, US News & World Report, Newsweek, The Futurist, USA Today, Business Week, the Economist, Puget Sound Business Journal, and the Los Angeles Times.

In a first career, Glen was an award-winning educator; he also served as a Visiting Scholar at the Human Interface Technology Lab at the University of Washington, which worked on virtual and augmented reality technology.

Glen was educated at Whitworth College, the University of Oregon, and the University of Washington. He lives in Seattle, Washington.

Contact us to discuss your event.

See the article here:
Nikolas Badminton | Futurist Speaker | Futurist Keynotes | Futurist.com

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on Nikolas Badminton | Futurist Speaker | Futurist Keynotes | Futurist.com

2023 The Year Ahead | The Futurist

Posted: at 12:08 am

David Houle| Special to the Herald-Tribune

As a futurist, my goal is to be directionally accurate in all my forecasts. Long-term trends and dynamics are what guide me. Through the years I have had great accuracy in directions, if not in specific details or timing.

So this column is based on the direction and acceleration of trends and what that might look like in 2023.

The long-term trend to EVs will keep accelerating. 2023 and 2024 will both be years of increasing sales until 2025 when there will be dozens of EV models in a price-competitive marketplace. That is when sales figures become truly significant, rather than just moderate year-over-year growth.

Cable subscriptions will go down and streaming subscriptions will continue to rise. That said, the average number of subscriptions for households will go down as people continue to cut costs for television

Inflation is now starting to trend downward. By late spring 2023, inflation will be down to 3-4%.

The Fed will continue to increase rates in the first quarter of 2023 but at lower increments. By mid-year, they will stop increasing rates.

The Ukraine War will drag on. There will not be a negotiated settlement to the conflict. I think there is a possibility that Putin might be forced to step down by the end of the year, but the opaqueness of the Kremlin is such that we wont know until a coup is over. By the end of the year, it will be clear that tens of billions of dollars will be needed to rebuild Ukraine. It will also become clear by the end of the year that Russia is on a fast track to become a secondary economic power.

The Senate is controlled by the Democrats and the House is controlled by the GOP. This will end up showcasing the perception that the Senate puts forth legislation and the House rejects it. To the degree the GOP does not address their two campaign issues inflation and crime but instead goes down the rabbit hole of irrelevant investigations, they will lower their chances for elective victory in 2024.

The Senate will need to become more centrist if there is to be hope for support in the House. President Bidens deep desire for bi-partisanship will manifest in a good working relationship with Minority Leader McConnell.

Governor DeSantis is the clear front-runner for the 2024 presidential nomination. He will start to build up a campaign effort for a 4th quarter announcement that he is running for president in 2024

Donald Trump will get indicted.

Joe Biden will decide by the end of the year to not run for reelection in 2024.

The residential housing market will enter a national recession. Florida will be less affected than the rest of the country. Sarasota and Manatee counties will be less affected than the rest of the state. But all prices will be down compared to a year ago.

There will be a global recession, but it will be a mild one and will vary greatly around the world. Some countries will truly suffer hard landings and others will most definitely have soft landings. The U.S. will experience a mild slowdown.

The price of oil will continue to drift lower through the course of the year. The average for 2023 will be around $70-$75 for WTI.

Equity markets will largely go sideways in 2023. with continued volatility.

China will continue to have problems. The real estate market is way over-leveraged and overpriced. There could be a million COVID-19 deaths there in the coming months. In addition, large numbers of people under 30 will emigrate to Europe and North America.

After half a decade of democracy in decline around the world, democracy is and will be ascendant throughout the year. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and to a lesser extent Turkey, will all undergo economic and social problems.

The U.K. will continue to suffer through its post-Brexit malaise of inflation, contraction and political disarray.

Crime will increase in many cities across the U.S. This is due in part to the massive changes in the workplace. The vacancy rate in downtown office buildings hit a high of 17% in the third quarter of 2021 and has been consistently around 12.5% since, which is above the historical average.

The work-from-home trend that came from COVID-19 will continue. It is clear that upper management would like employees to come back to the office, at least a few days a week. Corporate leaders seem to want workers to return, and there is a slow movement in that direction. The problem that will need to be addressed, is inflation.

Someone who used to commute five days a week was the same person who left the office at lunchtime for a $10 sandwich or a trip to a salad bar will now be confronted by a $15 price tag at the minimum.

Sarasota resident David Houle is a globally recognized futurist. He has given speeches on six continents, written 13 books and is futurist in residence at Ringling College of Art andDesign. His websites aredavidhoule.comandthe2020sdecade.com. Email him at david@davidhoule.com.

Read more:
2023 The Year Ahead | The Futurist

Posted in Futurist | Comments Off on 2023 The Year Ahead | The Futurist

Mars – Wikipedia

Posted: at 12:07 am

Comparison: Earth and MarsVideo (01:28) showing how three NASA orbiters mapped the gravity field of Mars

Mars is approximately half the diameter of Earth, with a surface area only slightly less than the total area of Earth's dry land.[2] Mars is less dense than Earth, having about 15% of Earth's volume and 11% of Earth's mass, resulting in about 38% of Earth's surface gravity. The red-orange appearance of the Martian surface is caused by iron(III) oxide, or rust.[57] It can look like butterscotch;[58] other common surface colors include golden, brown, tan, and greenish, depending on the minerals present.[58]

Like Earth, Mars has differentiated into a dense metallic core overlaid by less dense materials.[59][60] Current models of its interior imply a core consisting primarily of iron and nickel with about 1617% sulfur.[61] This iron(II) sulfide core is thought to be twice as rich in lighter elements as Earth's.[62] The core is surrounded by a silicate mantle that formed many of the tectonic and volcanic features on the planet, but it appears to be dormant. Besides silicon and oxygen, the most abundant elements in the Martian crust are iron, magnesium, aluminium, calcium, and potassium. The average thickness of the planet's crust is about 50 kilometres (31mi), with a maximum thickness of 125 kilometres (78mi).[62] By comparison, Earth's crust averages 40 kilometres (25mi) in thickness.[63][64]

Mars is seismically active. InSight has detected and recorded over 450 marsquakes and related events in 2019.[65][66] In 2021 it was reported that based on eleven low-frequency Marsquakes detected by the InSight lander the core of Mars is indeed liquid and has a radius of about 183040km and a temperature around 19002000K. The Martian core radius is more than half the radius of Mars and about half the size of the Earth's core. This is somewhat larger than models predicted, suggesting that the core contains some amount of lighter elements like oxygen and hydrogen in addition to the ironnickel alloy and about 15% of sulfur.[67][68]

The core of Mars is overlaid by the rocky mantle, which, however, does not seem to have a thermally insulating layer analogous to the Earth's lower mantle.[68] The Martian mantle appears to be solid down to the depth of about 500km, where the low-velocity zone (partially melted asthenosphere) begins.[69] Below the asthenosphere the velocity of seismic waves starts to grow again and at the depth of about 1050km there lies the boundary of the transition zone extending down to the core.[68]

Mars is a terrestrial planet with a surface that consists of minerals containing silicon and oxygen, metals, and other elements that typically make up rock. The Martian surface is primarily composed of tholeiitic basalt,[71] although parts are more silica-rich than typical basalt and may be similar to andesitic rocks on Earth, or silica glass. Regions of low albedo suggest concentrations of plagioclase feldspar, with northern low albedo regions displaying higher than normal concentrations of sheet silicates and high-silicon glass. Parts of the southern highlands include detectable amounts of high-calcium pyroxenes. Localized concentrations of hematite and olivine have been found.[72] Much of the surface is deeply covered by finely grained iron(III) oxide dust.[73]

Although Mars has no evidence of a structured global magnetic field,[74] observations show that parts of the planet's crust have been magnetized, suggesting that alternating polarity reversals of its dipole field have occurred in the past. This paleomagnetism of magnetically susceptible minerals is similar to the alternating bands found on Earth's ocean floors. One theory, published in 1999 and re-examined in October2005 (with the help of the Mars Global Surveyor), is that these bands suggest plate tectonic activity on Mars four billion years ago, before the planetary dynamo ceased to function and the planet's magnetic field faded.[75]

Scientists have theorized that during the Solar System's formation Mars was created as the result of a random process of run-away accretion of material from the protoplanetary disk that orbited the Sun. Mars has many distinctive chemical features caused by its position in the Solar System. Elements with comparatively low boiling points, such as chlorine, phosphorus, and sulfur, are much more common on Mars than Earth; these elements were probably pushed outward by the young Sun's energetic solar wind.[76]

After the formation of the planets, all were subjected to the so-called "Late Heavy Bombardment". About 60% of the surface of Mars shows a record of impacts from that era,[77][78][79] whereas much of the remaining surface is probably underlain by immense impact basins caused by those events. There is evidence of an enormous impact basin in the Northern Hemisphere of Mars, spanning 10,600 by 8,500 kilometres (6,600 by 5,300mi), or roughly four times the size of the Moon's South Pole Aitken basin, the largest impact basin yet discovered.[80] This theory suggests that Mars was struck by a Pluto-sized body about four billion years ago. The event, thought to be the cause of the Martian hemispheric dichotomy, created the smooth Borealis basin that covers 40% of the planet.[81][82]

The geological history of Mars can be split into many periods, but the following are the three primary periods:[83][84]

Geological activity is still taking place on Mars. The Athabasca Valles is home to sheet-like lava flows created about 200mya. Water flows in the grabens called the Cerberus Fossae occurred less than 20Mya, indicating equally recent volcanic intrusions.[86] The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has captured images of avalanches.[87][88]

The Phoenix lander returned data showing Martian soil to be slightly alkaline and containing elements such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and chlorine. These nutrients are found in soils on Earth. They are necessary for growth of plants.[89] Experiments performed by the lander showed that the Martian soil has a basic pH of 7.7, and contains 0.6% of the salt perchlorate,[90][91] concentrations that are toxic to humans.[92][93]

Streaks are common across Mars and new ones appear frequently on steep slopes of craters, troughs, and valleys. The streaks are dark at first and get lighter with age. The streaks can start in a tiny area, then spread out for hundreds of metres. They have been seen to follow the edges of boulders and other obstacles in their path. The commonly accepted theories include that they are dark underlying layers of soil revealed after avalanches of bright dust or dust devils.[94] Several other explanations have been put forward, including those that involve water or even the growth of organisms.[95][96]

Proportion of water ice present in the upper meter of the Martian surface for lower (top) and higher (bottom) latitudes

Water in its liquid form cannot exist on the surface of Mars due to low atmospheric pressure, which is less than 1% that of Earth's,[22] except at the lowest elevations for short periods.[60][97] The two polar ice caps appear to be made largely of water.[24][25] The volume of water ice in the south polar ice cap, if melted, would be enough to cover the entire surface of the planet with a depth of 11 metres (36ft).[98] Large quantities of ice are thought to be trapped within the thick cryosphere of Mars. Radar data from Mars Express and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) show large quantities of ice at both poles,[99][100] and at middle latitudes.[101] The Phoenix lander directly sampled water ice in shallow Martian soil on 31 July 2008.[102]

Landforms visible on Mars strongly suggest that liquid water has existed on the planet's surface. Huge linear swathes of scoured ground, known as outflow channels, cut across the surface in about 25 places. These are thought to be a record of erosion caused by the catastrophic release of water from subsurface aquifers, though some of these structures have been hypothesized to result from the action of glaciers or lava.[103][104] One of the larger examples, Ma'adim Vallis, is 700 kilometres (430mi) long, much greater than the Grand Canyon, with a width of 20 kilometres (12mi) and a depth of 2 kilometres (1.2mi) in places. It is thought to have been carved by flowing water early in Mars's history.[105] The youngest of these channels are thought to have formed only a few million years ago.[106] Elsewhere, particularly on the oldest areas of the Martian surface, finer-scale, dendritic networks of valleys are spread across significant proportions of the landscape. Features of these valleys and their distribution strongly imply that they were carved by runoff resulting from precipitation in early Mars history. Subsurface water flow and groundwater sapping may play important subsidiary roles in some networks, but precipitation was probably the root cause of the incision in almost all cases.[107]

Along crater and canyon walls, there are thousands of features that appear similar to terrestrial gullies. The gullies tend to be in the highlands of the Southern Hemisphere and to face the Equator; all are poleward of 30 latitude. A number of authors have suggested that their formation process involves liquid water, probably from melting ice,[108][109] although others have argued for formation mechanisms involving carbon dioxide frost or the movement of dry dust.[110][111] No partially degraded gullies have formed by weathering and no superimposed impact craters have been observed, indicating that these are young features, possibly still active.[109] Other geological features, such as deltas and alluvial fans preserved in craters, are further evidence for warmer, wetter conditions at an interval or intervals in earlier Mars history.[112] Such conditions necessarily require the widespread presence of crater lakes across a large proportion of the surface, for which there is independent mineralogical, sedimentological and geomorphological evidence.[113] Further evidence that liquid water once existed on the surface of Mars comes from the detection of specific minerals such as hematite and goethite, both of which sometimes form in the presence of water.[114]

In 2004, Opportunity detected the mineral jarosite. This forms only in the presence of acidic water, showing that water once existed on Mars.[115][116] The Spirit rover found concentrated deposits of silica in 2007 that indicated wet conditions in the past, and in December 2011, the mineral gypsum, which also forms in the presence of water, was found on the surface by NASA's Mars rover Opportunity.[117][118][119] It is estimated that the amount of water in the upper mantle of Mars, represented by hydroxyl ions contained within Martian minerals, is equal to or greater than that of Earth at 50300 parts per million of water, which is enough to cover the entire planet to a depth of 2001,000 metres (6603,280ft).[120][121]

On 18 March 2013, NASA reported evidence from instruments on the Curiosity rover of mineral hydration, likely hydrated calcium sulfate, in several rock samples including the broken fragments of "Tintina" rock and "Sutton Inlier" rock as well as in veins and nodules in other rocks like "Knorr" rock and "Wernicke" rock.[122][123] Analysis using the rover's DAN instrument provided evidence of subsurface water, amounting to as much as 4% water content, down to a depth of 60 centimetres (24in), during the rover's traverse from the Bradbury Landing site to the Yellowknife Bay area in the Glenelg terrain.[122] In September 2015, NASA announced that they had found strong evidence of hydrated brine flows in recurring slope lineae, based on spectrometer readings of the darkened areas of slopes.[124][125][126] These streaks flow downhill in Martian summer, when the temperature is above 23 Celsius, and freeze at lower temperatures.[127] These observations supported earlier hypotheses, based on timing of formation and their rate of growth, that these dark streaks resulted from water flowing just below the surface.[128] However, later work suggested that the lineae may be dry, granular flows instead, with at most a limited role for water in initiating the process.[129] A definitive conclusion about the presence, extent, and role of liquid water on the Martian surface remains elusive.[130][131]

Researchers suspect much of the low northern plains of the planet were covered with an ocean hundreds of meters deep, though this theory remains controversial.[132] In March 2015, scientists stated that such an ocean might have been the size of Earth's Arctic Ocean. This finding was derived from the ratio of water to deuterium in the modern Martian atmosphere compared to that ratio on Earth. The amount of Martian deuterium is eight times the amount that exists on Earth, suggesting that ancient Mars had significantly higher levels of water. Results from the Curiosity rover had previously found a high ratio of deuterium in Gale Crater, though not significantly high enough to suggest the former presence of an ocean. Other scientists caution that these results have not been confirmed, and point out that Martian climate models have not yet shown that the planet was warm enough in the past to support bodies of liquid water.[133] Near the northern polar cap is the 81.4 kilometres (50.6mi) wide Korolev Crater, which the Mars Express orbiter found to be filled with approximately 2,200 cubic kilometres (530cumi) of water ice.[134]

In November 2016, NASA reported finding a large amount of underground ice in the Utopia Planitia region. The volume of water detected has been estimated to be equivalent to the volume of water in Lake Superior.[135][136] During observations from 2018 through 2021, the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter spotted indications of water, probably subsurface ice, in the Valles Marineris canyon system.[137]

North polar early summer water ice cap (1999); a seasonal layer of carbon dioxide ice forms in winter and disappears in summer.

Mars has two permanent polar ice caps. During a pole's winter, it lies in continuous darkness, chilling the surface and causing the deposition of 2530% of the atmosphere into slabs of CO2 ice (dry ice).[139] When the poles are again exposed to sunlight, the frozen CO2 sublimes. These seasonal actions transport large amounts of dust and water vapor, giving rise to Earth-like frost and large cirrus clouds. Clouds of water-ice were photographed by the Opportunity rover in 2004.[140]

The caps at both poles consist primarily (70%) of water ice. Frozen carbon dioxide accumulates as a comparatively thin layer about one metre thick on the north cap in the northern winter only, whereas the south cap has a permanent dry ice cover about eight metres thick. This permanent dry ice cover at the south pole is peppered by flat floored, shallow, roughly circular pits, which repeat imaging shows are expanding by?? meters per year; this suggests that the permanent CO2 cover over the south pole water ice is degrading over time.[141] The northern polar cap has a diameter of about 1,000 kilometres (620mi),[142] and contains about 1.6million cubic kilometres (5.71016cuft) of ice, which, if spread evenly on the cap, would be 2 kilometres (1.2mi) thick.[143] (This compares to a volume of 2.85million cubic kilometres (1.011017cuft) for the Greenland ice sheet.) The southern polar cap has a diameter of 350 kilometres (220mi) and a thickness of 3 kilometres (1.9mi).[144] The total volume of ice in the south polar cap plus the adjacent layered deposits has been estimated at 1.6million cubic km.[145] Both polar caps show spiral troughs, which recent analysis of SHARAD ice penetrating radar has shown are a result of katabatic winds that spiral due to the Coriolis effect.[146][147]

The seasonal frosting of areas near the southern ice cap results in the formation of transparent 1-metre-thick slabs of dry ice above the ground. With the arrival of spring, sunlight warms the subsurface and pressure from subliming CO2 builds up under a slab, elevating and ultimately rupturing it. This leads to geyser-like eruptions of CO2 gas mixed with dark basaltic sand or dust. This process is rapid, observed happening in the space of a few days, weeks or months, a rate of change rather unusual in geology especially for Mars. The gas rushing underneath a slab to the site of a geyser carves a spiderweb-like pattern of radial channels under the ice, the process being the inverted equivalent of an erosion network formed by water draining through a single plughole.[148][149]

Although better remembered for mapping the Moon, Johann Heinrich Mdler and Wilhelm Beer were the first areographers. They began by establishing that most of Mars's surface features were permanent and by more precisely determining the planet's rotation period. In 1840, Mdler combined ten years of observations and drew the first map of Mars.[150]

Features on Mars are named from a variety of sources. Albedo features are named for classical mythology. Craters larger than roughly 50km are named for deceased scientists and writers and others who have contributed to the study of Mars. Smaller craters are named for towns and villages of the world with populations of less than 100,000. Large valleys are named for the word "Mars" or "star" in various languages; small valleys are named for rivers.[151]

Large albedo features retain many of the older names but are often updated to reflect new knowledge of the nature of the features. For example, Nix Olympica (the snows of Olympus) has become Olympus Mons (Mount Olympus).[152] The surface of Mars as seen from Earth is divided into two kinds of areas, with differing albedo. The paler plains covered with dust and sand rich in reddish iron oxides were once thought of as Martian "continents" and given names like Arabia Terra (land of Arabia) or Amazonis Planitia (Amazonian plain). The dark features were thought to be seas, hence their names Mare Erythraeum, Mare Sirenum and Aurorae Sinus. The largest dark feature seen from Earth is Syrtis Major Planum.[153] The permanent northern polar ice cap is named Planum Boreum. The southern cap is called Planum Australe.[154]

Mars's equator is defined by its rotation, but the location of its Prime Meridian was specified, as was Earth's (at Greenwich), by choice of an arbitrary point; Mdler and Beer selected a line for their first maps of Mars in 1830. After the spacecraft Mariner 9 provided extensive imagery of Mars in 1972, a small crater (later called Airy-0), located in the Sinus Meridiani ("Middle Bay" or "Meridian Bay"), was chosen by Merton Davies, Harold Masursky, and Grard de Vaucouleurs for the definition of 0.0 longitude to coincide with the original selection.[155][156][157]

Because Mars has no oceans and hence no "sea level", a zero-elevation surface had to be selected as a reference level; this is called the areoid[158] of Mars, analogous to the terrestrial geoid.[159] Zero altitude was defined by the height at which there is 610.5Pa (6.105mbar) of atmospheric pressure.[160] This pressure corresponds to the triple point of water, and it is about 0.6% of the sea level surface pressure on Earth (0.006 atm).[161]

For mapping purposes, the United States Geological Survey divides the surface of Mars into thirty cartographic quadrangles, each named for a classical albedo feature it contains.[162]

The shield volcano Olympus Mons (Mount Olympus) is an extinct volcano in the vast upland region Tharsis, which contains several other large volcanoes. The edifice is over 600km (370mi) wide.[163][164] Because the mountain is so large, with complex structure at its edges, allocating a height to it is difficult. Its local relief, from the foot of the cliffs which form its northwest margin to its peak, is over 21km (13mi),[164] a little over twice the height of Mauna Kea as measured from its base on the ocean floor. The total elevation change from the plains of Amazonis Planitia, over 1,000km (620mi) to the northwest, to the summit approaches 26km (16mi),[165] roughly three times the height of Mount Everest, which in comparison stands at just over 8.8 kilometres (5.5mi). Consequently, Olympus Mons is either the tallest or second-tallest mountain in the Solar System; the only known mountain which might be taller is the Rheasilvia peak on the asteroid Vesta, at 2025km (1216mi).[166]

The dichotomy of Martian topography is striking: northern plains flattened by lava flows contrast with the southern highlands, pitted and cratered by ancient impacts. It is possible that, four billion years ago, the Northern Hemisphere of Mars was struck by an object one-tenth to two-thirds the size of Earth's Moon. If this is the case, the Northern Hemisphere of Mars would be the site of an impact crater 10,600 by 8,500 kilometres (6,600 by 5,300mi) in size, or roughly the area of Europe, Asia, and Australia combined, surpassing Utopia Planitia and the Moon's South PoleAitken basin as the largest impact crater in the Solar System.[167][168][169]

Mars is scarred by a number of impact craters: a total of 43,000 craters with a diameter of 5 kilometres (3.1mi) or greater have been found.[170] The largest exposed crater is Hellas, which is 2,300 kilometres (1,400mi) wide and 7,000 metres (23,000ft) deep, and is a light albedo feature clearly visible from Earth.[171][172] There are other notable impact features, such as Argyre, which is around 1,800 kilometres (1,100mi) in diameter,[173] and Isidis, which is around 1,500 kilometres (930mi) in diameter.[174] Due to the smaller mass and size of Mars, the probability of an object colliding with the planet is about half that of Earth. Mars is located closer to the asteroid belt, so it has an increased chance of being struck by materials from that source. Mars is more likely to be struck by short-period comets, i.e., those that lie within the orbit of Jupiter.[175]

Martian craters can have a morphology that suggests the ground became wet after the meteor impacted.[176]

The large canyon, Valles Marineris (Latin for "Mariner Valleys", also known as Agathodaemon in the old canal maps[177]), has a length of 4,000 kilometres (2,500mi) and a depth of up to 7 kilometres (4.3mi). The length of Valles Marineris is equivalent to the length of Europe and extends across one-fifth the circumference of Mars. By comparison, the Grand Canyon on Earth is only 446 kilometres (277mi) long and nearly 2 kilometres (1.2mi) deep. Valles Marineris was formed due to the swelling of the Tharsis area, which caused the crust in the area of Valles Marineris to collapse. In 2012, it was proposed that Valles Marineris is not just a graben, but a plate boundary where 150 kilometres (93mi) of transverse motion has occurred, making Mars a planet with possibly a two-tectonic plate arrangement.[178][179]

Images from the Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) aboard NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter have revealed seven possible cave entrances on the flanks of the volcano Arsia Mons.[180] The caves, named after loved ones of their discoverers, are collectively known as the "seven sisters".[181] Cave entrances measure from 100 to 252 metres (328 to 827ft) wide and they are estimated to be at least 73 to 96 metres (240 to 315ft) deep. Because light does not reach the floor of most of the caves, it is possible that they extend much deeper than these lower estimates and widen below the surface. "Dena" is the only exception; its floor is visible and was measured to be 130 metres (430ft) deep. The interiors of these caverns may be protected from micrometeoroids, UV radiation, solar flares and high energy particles that bombard the planet's surface.[182][183]

Mars lost its magnetosphere 4billion years ago,[184] possibly because of numerous asteroid strikes,[185] so the solar wind interacts directly with the Martian ionosphere, lowering the atmospheric density by stripping away atoms from the outer layer.[186] Both Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Express have detected ionised atmospheric particles trailing off into space behind Mars,[184][187] and this atmospheric loss is being studied by the MAVEN orbiter. Compared to Earth, the atmosphere of Mars is quite rarefied. Atmospheric pressure on the surface today ranges from a low of 30Pa (0.0044psi) on Olympus Mons to over 1,155Pa (0.1675psi) in Hellas Planitia, with a mean pressure at the surface level of 600Pa (0.087psi).[188] The highest atmospheric density on Mars is equal to that found 35 kilometres (22mi)[189] above Earth's surface. The resulting mean surface pressure is only 0.6% of that of Earth 101.3kPa (14.69psi). The scale height of the atmosphere is about 10.8 kilometres (6.7mi),[190] which is higher than Earth's 6 kilometres (3.7mi), because the surface gravity of Mars is only about 38% of Earth's.[191]

The atmosphere of Mars consists of about 96% carbon dioxide, 1.93% argon and 1.89% nitrogen along with traces of oxygen and water.[2][192][186] The atmosphere is quite dusty, containing particulates about 1.5 m in diameter which give the Martian sky a tawny color when seen from the surface.[193] It may take on a pink hue due to iron oxide particles suspended in it.[27] The concentration of methane in the Martian atmosphere fluctuates from about 0.24 ppb during the northern winter to about 0.65 ppb during the summer.[194] Estimates of its lifetime range from 0.6 to 4 years,[195][196] so its presence indicates that an active source of the gas must be present. Methane could be produced by non-biological process such as serpentinization involving water, carbon dioxide, and the mineral olivine, which is known to be common on Mars,[197] or by Martian life.[198]

Compared to Earth, its higher concentration of atmospheric CO2 and lower surface pressure may be why sound is attenuated more on Mars, where natural sources are rare apart from the wind. Using acoustic recordings collected by the Perseverance rover, researchers concluded that the speed of sound there is approximately 240m/s for frequencies below 240Hz, and 250m/s for those above.[200][201]

Auroras have been detected on Mars.[202][203][204] Because Mars lacks a global magnetic field, the types and distribution of auroras there differ from those on Earth;[205] rather than being mostly restricted to polar regions, a Martian aurora can encompass the planet.[206] In September 2017, NASA reported radiation levels on the surface of the planet Mars were temporarily doubled, and were associated with an aurora 25 times brighter than any observed earlier, due to a massive, and unexpected, solar storm in the middle of the month.[206][207]

Of all the planets in the Solar System, the seasons of Mars are the most Earth-like, due to the similar tilts of the two planets' rotational axes. The lengths of the Martian seasons are about twice those of Earth's because Mars's greater distance from the Sun leads to the Martian year being about two Earth years long. Martian surface temperatures vary from lows of about 110C (166F) to highs of up to 35C (95F) in equatorial summer.[17] The wide range in temperatures is due to the thin atmosphere which cannot store much solar heat, the low atmospheric pressure, and the low thermal inertia of Martian soil.[208] The planet is 1.52 times as far from the Sun as Earth, resulting in just 43% of the amount of sunlight.[209][210]

If Mars had an Earth-like orbit, its seasons would be similar to Earth's because its axial tilt is similar to Earth's. The comparatively large eccentricity of the Martian orbit has a significant effect. Mars is near perihelion when it is summer in the Southern Hemisphere and winter in the north, and near aphelion when it is winter in the Southern Hemisphere and summer in the north. As a result, the seasons in the Southern Hemisphere are more extreme and the seasons in the northern are milder than would otherwise be the case. The summer temperatures in the south can be warmer than the equivalent summer temperatures in the north by up to 30C (54F).[211]

Mars has the largest dust storms in the Solar System, reaching speeds of over 160km/h (100mph). These can vary from a storm over a small area, to gigantic storms that cover the entire planet. They tend to occur when Mars is closest to the Sun, and have been shown to increase the global temperature.[212]

Read this article:
Mars - Wikipedia

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Mars – Wikipedia