The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: November 2022
List of territorial disputes – Wikipedia
Posted: November 25, 2022 at 5:07 am
TerritoryClaimantsNotesAbagaitu IsletRussiaPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1][note 2]Generally held to have been resolved in October 2004 by the Complementary Agreement between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation on the Eastern Section of the China-Russia Boundary. However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]AbkhaziaRepublic of AbkhaziaGeorgiaDepsang Plains, Aksai ChinPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]IndiaArunachal Pradesh / South TibetIndiaPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Controlled by India but claimed by the PRC and ROC who dispute the validity of the McMahon Line.Bch Long V IslandVietnamRepublic of China[note 2]Ceded to Vietnam by the PRC in 1957.[70] However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Chinese side of Baekdu Mountain[71]People's Republic of ChinaSouth KoreaRepublic of China[note 2]Settled by the PRC and DPRK in 1962. However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China,[note 2] and the Republic of Korea.Korean side of Baekdu Mountain[71]North KoreaSouth KoreaRepublic of China[note 2]Also formerly claimed by the PRC until 1962.Beyul Khenpajong, the Menchuma Valley, and Chagdzom[72]BhutanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Eastern part of BhutanBhutanRepublic of China[note 2]Bhutanese exclaves in western Tibet, namely Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar, Gesur, Gezon, Itse Gompa, Khochar, Nyanri, Ringung, Sanmar, Darchen, Doklam, and ZuthulphukPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]BhutanDadivankAzerbaijanArmeniaArtsakhUnder the military control of Russian peacekeepers since 2020.Demchok sector / Parigas regionIndiaPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Chumar, Gue, Kaurik, Shipki La, Tashigang, Barahoti, Lapthal, Jadhang, Nelang, Pulam Sumda and SangIndiaPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Controlled by India but claimed by Zanda County, Ngari Prefecture, Tibet, China. Disputed areas located between Aksai Chin and Nepal.Gaza Strip Gaza Strip PalestineIsraelDe facto administrated by Hamas since July 2007.A small area of Gilgit-BaltistanPakistanIndiaRepublic of China[note 2]3,700 square miles (9,600km2) of territory in Gilgit-Baltistan, and the Siachen Glacier[73]PakistanIndiaRepublic of China[note 1])the People's Republic of China relinquished its claim to Pakistan. India and the Republic of China did not.James ShoalMalaysiaPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]North CyprusTurkish Republic of Northern CyprusRepublic of CyprusNorthern Cyprus (a state with limited recognition) controls and administers the northern part of the island.The Republic of Cyprus claims the whole island.Macclesfield BankPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]PhilippinesMainland China, Hainan, and other areas controlled by the PRCPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Moldovan-controlled area of Dubsari districtMoldovaPridnestrovian Moldavian RepublicKokkina/Erenky exclaveTurkish Republic of Northern CyprusRepublic of CyprusNorthern Cyprus controls and administers Kokkina, an area separated from the rest of the main land on Northern Cyprus via the land controlled by the Republic of Cyprus.Heixiazi / Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island(eastern half)RussiaRepublic of China[note 2]Generally held to have been resolved in October 2004 by the Complementary Agreement between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation on the Eastern Section of the China-Russia Boundary. However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Heixiazi / Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island(western half)People's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Hong KongPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Former ROC president Lee Teng-hui claimed that Hong Kong should have been returned to the ROC instead of the PRC because the ROC government had the original manuscript of the Treaty of Nanking.[74]JiangxinpoMyanmarRepublic of China[note 2]Northern parts of Sagaing Region and Kachin State, claimed by the Republic of China as part of Yunnan. Formerly claimed by the People's Republic of China until 1961.944km2 of territory on the ChinaKazakhstan borderKazakhstanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1][note 2]The Kazakh Government ceded 407km2 to the PRC, and the PRC ceded 537km2 to Kazakhstan in 1999. However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Khan Tengri peak, the Boz-Tik site, the Bedel pass, the Uzongu-Kuush valley, and the Erkeshtam pass[75]KyrgyzstanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1][note 2]In an agreement signed in 1999, the Khan Tengri peak, the Boz-Tik site, the Bedel pass, and the Erkeshtam pass were ceded to the Kyrgyz government while the Uzongu-Kuush valley was ceded to the PRC. However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]KosovoRepublic of KosovoSerbiaKosovo is the subject of a territorial dispute between the Republic of Serbia and the self-proclaimed Republic of Kosovo. The latter declared independence on 17 February 2008, while Serbia claims it as part of its own sovereign territory. Its independence is recognized by 97 UN member states.Kula Kangri and mountainous areas to the west of this peak, plus the western Haa District of BhutanBhutanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Kutuzov IslandRussiaRepublic of China[note 2]Lachin corridorArtsakhAzerbaijanArmeniaUnder the military control of Russian peacekeepers since 2020.MacauPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Both the PRC and the ROC officially consider themselves to be the sole legitimate government over the entirety of China.Nagorno-Karabakh regionArtsakhAzerbaijanArmeniaInternationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan,[76] de facto controlled by the Republic of Artsakh supported by Armenia.Namwan Assigned TractMyanmarRepublic of China[note 2]Settled by Myanmar and the PRC in the Sino-Burmese Boundary Treaty in 1960 and officially ceded to Myanmar in 1961.[77] However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Outer MongoliaMongoliaRepublic of China[note 1]The Republic of China briefly recognized Mongolia's independence between 1945 and 1952, and from 2002 onwards; however, under the Constitution of the Republic of China, the ROC claim on Mongolia cannot be withdrawn without recourse to a referendum.Pamir MountainsTajikistanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1][note 2]The Tajik Government ceded 1,158km2 to the PRC, while PRC relinquished its 73,000km2 claim over the remaining territory with final ratification of a treaty in January 2011.[78][note 2] However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Paracel Islands[1]People's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]VietnamEntirely controlled by the People's Republic of China but claimed by the Republic of China and Vietnam.[79]Parangcho[80]South KoreaPeople's Republic of ChinaRepublic of China[note 2]Rasu, Kimathanka, Nara Pass, Tingribode, and Mount EverestNepalRepublic of China[note 2]Settled by Nepal and the PRC in 1960.[81] However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Scarborough ShoalPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]PhilippinesControlled by the PRC since the 2012 Scarborough Shoal standoff.Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary[82]BhutanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu Tai or Diaoyu Dao)[1]JapanPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]Controlled by Japan but claimed by the PRC and ROC.[83]Shaksgam ValleyPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]IndiaPakistan was originally a party to the dispute but relinquished its claim and accepted Chinese sovereignty over the area in 1963.Sixty-Four Villages East of the RiverRussiaRepublic of China[note 2]Republic of SomalilandSomalilandSomaliaSouth OssetiaRepublic of South OssetiaGeorgiaSpratly IslandsPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]VietnamPhilippines (part)Malaysia (part)Brunei (part)Each of the claimant countries except Brunei controls one or more of the individual islands.'Border' checkpoint near StroviliaUnited KingdomTurkish Republic of Northern CyprusNorthern Cyprus controls and administers the border checkpoint near Strovilia.UK's claim in regard to its Sovereign Base AreasTechnically, of course, this also involves Cyprus; the checkpoint is partially on UN-administered land, and Cyprus claims all of the island. (See: Europe)Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, Pratas Island, and the Vereker BanksRepublic of China[84][note 1]People's Republic of China[85][note 1]The government of the People's Republic of China claims the entire island of Taiwan, as well as a number of minor islands, such as Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu, that are controlled by the Republic of China. See also: Anti-Secession Law, Political status of Taiwan.Trans-Karakoram TractsPeople's Republic of China[note 1]Republic of China[note 1]IndiaTransnistria (including Bendery)Pridnestrovian Moldavian RepublicMoldovaTannu UriankhaiRussiaRepublic of China[note 1]Originally part of China during the Qing dynasty but came under Russian influence in the 20th century. Sovereignty over the area has not been officially relinquished by the ROC. However, the claim is not actively pursued by the ROC government.Tumen River (disputed sovereignty of certain islands)[1][note 3]People's Republic of China[note 1]North KoreaRepublic of China[note 1][note 2]South KoreaTumen River mouthNorth KoreaSouth KoreaRepublic of China[note 2]Navigation and control of the mouth of the river Tumen is disputed between the Republic of China and DPRK along with the Republic of Korea.Varnita and CopancaMoldovaPridnestrovian Moldavian RepublicEastern part of Wakhan CorridorAfghanistanRepublic of China[note 2]The border was established between Afghanistan and China in an agreement between the British and the Russians in 1895 as part of the Great Game, although the Chinese and Afghans did not finally agree on the border until 1963.[86][87] The Kingdom of Afghanistan and the People's Republic of China demarcated their border in 1963.[86][88][note 2] However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]Western SaharaMoroccoSahrawi Arab Democratic RepublicThe United Nations keeps the Western Sahara in its list of non-self-governing territories and considers the sovereignty issue as unresolved pending a final solution. To that end, the UN sent a mission in the territory to oversee a referendum on self-determination in 1991, but it never happened. Administration was relinquished by Spain in 1976.Yalu River (disputed sovereignty of certain islands)[1][note 3]People's Republic of China[note 1]North KoreaRepublic of China[note 1][note 2]South KoreaGenerally held to have been resolved in 2005. North Korea is allocated all of the large islands in the lower Yalu River, including Pidan and Sindo at the mouth.[89] The river's maritime rights remain shared between North Korea and the PRC. However, the settlement is not recognized by the Republic of China.[note 2]
Follow this link:
Comments Off on List of territorial disputes – Wikipedia
First-degree atrioventricular block – Wikipedia
Posted: at 5:07 am
Medical condition
First-degree atrioventricular block (AV block) is a disease of the electrical conduction system of the heart in which electrical impulses conduct from the cardiac atria to the ventricles through the atrioventricular node (AV node) more slowly than normal. First degree AV block does not generally cause any symptoms, but may progress to more severe forms of heart block such as second- and third-degree atrioventricular block. It is diagnosed using an electrocardiogram, and is defined as a PR interval greater than 200 milliseconds.[1] First degree AV block affects 0.65-1.1% of the population with 0.13 new cases per 1000 persons each year.
The most common causes of first-degree heart block are AV nodal disease, enhanced vagal tone (for example in athletes), myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction (especially acute inferior MI), electrolyte disturbances and medication. The medications that most commonly cause first-degree heart block are those that increase the refractory time of the AV node, thereby slowing AV conduction. These include calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, cardiac glycosides, and anything that increases cholinergic activity such as cholinesterase inhibitors.[2]
In normal individuals, the AV node slows the conduction of electrical impulses through the heart. This is manifest on a surface electrocardiogram (ECG) as the PR interval. The normal PR interval is from 120 ms to 200 ms in length. This is measured from the initial deflection of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex.[3]
In first-degree heart block, the diseased AV node conducts the electrical activity more slowly. This is seen as a PR interval greater than 200 ms in length on the surface ECG. It is usually an incidental finding on a routine ECG.[4]
First-degree heart block does not require any particular investigations except for electrolyte and drug screens, especially if an overdose is suspected.[5]
The management includes identifying and correcting electrolyte imbalances and withholding any offending medications. This condition does not require admission unless there is an associated myocardial infarction. Even though it usually does not progress to higher forms of heart block, it may require outpatient follow-up and monitoring of the ECG, especially if there is a comorbid bundle branch block. If there is a need for treatment of an unrelated condition, care should be taken not to introduce any medication that may slow AV conduction. If this is not feasible, clinicians should be very cautious when introducing any drug that may slow conduction; and regular monitoring of the ECG is indicated.[6]
Isolated first-degree heart block has no direct clinical consequences. There are no symptoms or signs associated with it. It was originally thought of as having a benign prognosis. In the Framingham Heart Study, however, the presence of a prolonged PR interval or first degree AV block doubled the risk of developing atrial fibrillation, tripled the risk of requiring an artificial pacemaker, and was associated with a small increase in mortality. This risk was proportional to the degree of PR prolongation.[7]
A subset of individuals with the triad of first-degree heart block, right bundle branch block, and either left anterior fascicular block or left posterior fascicular block (known as trifascicular block) may be at an increased risk of progression to complete heart block.[8]
See the original post:
Comments Off on First-degree atrioventricular block – Wikipedia
Comparative genomic hybridization – Wikipedia
Posted: at 5:07 am
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic method for analysing copy number variations (CNVs) relative to ploidy level in the DNA of a test sample compared to a reference sample, without the need for culturing cells. The aim of this technique is to quickly and efficiently compare two genomic DNA samples arising from two sources, which are most often closely related, because it is suspected that they contain differences in terms of either gains or losses of either whole chromosomes or subchromosomal regions (a portion of a whole chromosome). This technique was originally developed for the evaluation of the differences between the chromosomal complements of solid tumor and normal tissue,[1] and has an improved resolution of 510 megabases compared to the more traditional cytogenetic analysis techniques of giemsa banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) which are limited by the resolution of the microscope utilized.[2][3]
This is achieved through the use of competitive fluorescence in situ hybridization. In short, this involves the isolation of DNA from the two sources to be compared, most commonly a test and reference source, independent labelling of each DNA sample with fluorophores (fluorescent molecules) of different colours (usually red and green), denaturation of the DNA so that it is single stranded, and the hybridization of the two resultant samples in a 1:1 ratio to a normal metaphase spread of chromosomes, to which the labelled DNA samples will bind at their locus of origin. Using a fluorescence microscope and computer software, the differentially coloured fluorescent signals are then compared along the length of each chromosome for identification of chromosomal differences between the two sources. A higher intensity of the test sample colour in a specific region of a chromosome indicates the gain of material of that region in the corresponding source sample, while a higher intensity of the reference sample colour indicates the loss of material in the test sample in that specific region. A neutral colour (yellow when the fluorophore labels are red and green) indicates no difference between the two samples in that location.[2][3]
CGH is only able to detect unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities. This is because balanced chromosomal abnormalities such as reciprocal translocations, inversions or ring chromosomes do not affect copy number, which is what is detected by CGH technologies. CGH does, however, allow for the exploration of all 46 human chromosomes in single test and the discovery of deletions and duplications, even on the microscopic scale which may lead to the identification of candidate genes to be further explored by other cytological techniques.[2]
Through the use of DNA microarrays in conjunction with CGH techniques, the more specific form of array CGH (aCGH) has been developed, allowing for a locus-by-locus measure of CNV with increased resolution as low as 100 kilobases.[4][5] This improved technique allows for the aetiology of known and unknown conditions to be discovered.
The motivation underlying the development of CGH stemmed from the fact that the available forms of cytogenetic analysis at the time (giemsa banding and FISH) were limited in their potential resolution by the microscopes necessary for interpretation of the results they provided. Furthermore, giemsa banding interpretation has the potential to be ambiguous and therefore has lowered reliability, and both techniques require high labour inputs which limits the loci which may be examined.[4]
The first report of CGH analysis was by Kallioniemi and colleagues in 1992 at the University of California, San Francisco, who utilised CGH in the analysis of solid tumors. They achieved this by the direct application of the technique to both breast cancer cell lines and primary bladder tumors in order to establish complete copy number karyotypes for the cells. They were able to identify 16 different regions of amplification, many of which were novel discoveries.[1]
Soon after in 1993, du Manoir et al. reported virtually the same methodology. The authors painted a series of individual human chromosomes from a DNA library with two different fluorophores in different proportions to test the technique, and also applied CGH to genomic DNA from patients affected with either Downs syndrome or T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia as well as cells of a renal papillary carcinoma cell line. It was concluded that the fluorescence ratios obtained were accurate and that differences between genomic DNA from different cell types were detectable, and therefore that CGH was a highly useful cytogenetic analysis tool.[6]
Initially, the widespread use of CGH technology was difficult, as protocols were not uniform and therefore inconsistencies arose, especially due to uncertainties in the interpretation of data.[3] However, in 1994 a review was published which described an easily understood protocol in detail[7] and the image analysis software was made available commercially, which allowed CGH to be utilised all around the world.[3]As new techniques such as microdissection and degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) became available for the generation of DNA products, it was possible to apply the concept of CGH to smaller chromosomal abnormalities, and thus the resolution of CGH was improved.[3]
The implementation of array CGH, whereby DNA microarrays are used instead of the traditional metaphase chromosome preparation, was pioneered by Solinas-Tolodo et al. in 1997 using tumor cells[8] and Pinkel et al. in 1998 by use of breast cancer cells.[9] This was made possible by the Human Genome Project which generated a library of cloned DNA fragments with known locations throughout the human genome, with these fragments being used as probes on the DNA microarray.[10] Now probes of various origins such as cDNA, genomic PCR products and bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) can be used on DNA microarrays which may contain up to 2 million probes.[10] Array CGH is automated, allows greater resolution (down to 100 kb) than traditional CGH as the probes are far smaller than metaphase preparations, requires smaller amounts of DNA, can be targeted to specific chromosomal regions if required and is ordered and therefore faster to analyse, making it far more adaptable to diagnostic uses.[10][11]
The DNA on the slide is a reference sample, and is thus obtained from a karyotypically normal man or woman, though it is preferential to use female DNA as they possess two X chromosomes which contain far more genetic information than the male Y chromosome. Phytohaemagglutinin stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes are used. 1mL of heparinised blood is added to 10ml of culture medium and incubated for 72 hours at 37C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Colchicine is added to arrest the cells in mitosis, the cells are then harvested and treated with hypotonic potassium chloride and fixed in 3:1 methanol/acetic acid.[3]
One drop of the cell suspension should then be dropped onto an ethanol cleaned slide from a distance of about 30cm, optimally this should be carried out at room temperature at humidity levels of 6070%. Slides should be evaluated by visualisation using a phase contrast microscope, minimal cytoplasm should be observed and chromosomes should not be overlapping and be 400550 bands long with no separated chromatids and finally should appear dark rather than shiny. Slides then need to be air dried overnight at room temperature, and any further storage should be in groups of four at 20C with either silica beads or nitrogen present to maintain dryness. Different donors should be tested as hybridization may be variable. Commercially available slides may be used, but should always be tested first.[3]
Standard phenol extraction is used to obtain DNA from test or reference (karyotypically normal individual) tissue, which involves the combination of Tris-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and phenol with aqueous DNA in equal amounts. This is followed by separation by agitation and centrifugation, after which the aqueous layer is removed and further treated using ether and finally ethanol precipitation is used to concentrate the DNA.[3]
May be completed using DNA isolation kits available commercially which are based on affinity columns.[3]
Preferentially, DNA should be extracted from fresh or frozen tissue as this will be of the highest quality, though it is now possible to use archival material which is formalin fixed or paraffin wax embedded, provided the appropriate procedures are followed. 0.5-1g of DNA is sufficient for the CGH experiment, though if the desired amount is not obtained DOP-PCR may be applied to amplify the DNA, however it in this case it is important to apply DOP-PCR to both the test and reference DNA samples to improve reliability.[3]
Nick translation is used to label the DNA and involves cutting DNA and substituting nucleotides labelled with fluorophores (direct labelling) or biotin or oxigenin to have fluophore conjugated antibodies added later (indirect labelling). It is then important to check fragment lengths of both test and reference DNA by gel electrophoresis, as they should be within the range of 500kb-1500kb for optimum hybridization.[3]
Unlabelled Life Technologies Corporation's Cot-1 DNA (placental DNA enriched with repetitive sequences of length 50bp-100bp)is added to block normal repetitive DNA sequences, particularly at centromeres and telomeres, as these sequences, if detected, may reduce the fluorescence ratio and cause gains or losses to escape detection.[3]
812l of each of labelled test and labelled reference DNA are mixed and 40g Cot-1 DNA is added, then precipitated and subsequently dissolved in 6l of hybridization mix, which contains 50% formamide to decrease DNA melting temperature and 10% dextran sulphate to increase the effective probe concentration in a saline sodium citrate (SSC) solution at a pH of 7.0.[3]
Denaturation of the slide and probes are carried out separately. The slide is submerged in 70% formamide/2xSSC for 510 minutes at 72C, while the probes are denatured by immersion in a water bath of 80C for 10 minutes and are immediately added to the metaphase slide preparation. This reaction is then covered with a coverslip and left for two to four days in a humid chamber at 40C.[3]
The coverslip is then removed and 5 minute washes are applied, three using 2xSSC at room temperature, one at 45C with 0.1xSSC and one using TNT at room temperature. The reaction is then preincubated for 10 minutes then followed by a 60-minute, 37C incubation, three more 5 minute washes with TNT then one with 2xSSC at room temperature. The slide is then dried using an ethanol series of 70%/96%/100% before counterstaining with DAPI (0.35 g/ml), for chromosome identification, and sealing with a coverslip.[3]
A fluorescence microscope with the appropriate filters for the DAPI stain as well as the two fluorophores utilised is required for visualisation, and these filters should also minimise the crosstalk between the fluorophores, such as narrow band pass filters. The microscope must provide uniform illumination without chromatic variation, be appropriately aligned and have a "plan" type of objective which is apochromatic and give a magnification of x63 or x100.[3]
The image should be recorded using a camera with spatial resolution at least 0.1m at the specimen level and give an image of at least 600x600 pixels. The camera must also be able to integrate the image for at least 5 to 10 seconds, with a minimum photometric resolution of 8 bit.[3]
Dedicated CGH software is commercially available for the image processing step, and is required to subtract background noise, remove and segment materials not of chromosomal origin, normalize the fluorescence ratio, carry out interactive karyotyping and chromosome scaling to standard length. A "relative copy number karyotype" which presents chromosomal areas of deletions or amplifications is generated by averaging the ratios of a number of high quality metaphases and plotting them along an ideogram, a diagram identifying chromosomes based on banding patterns. Interpretation of the ratio profiles is conducted either using fixed or statistical thresholds (confidence intervals). When using confidence intervals, gains or losses are identified when 95% of the fluorescence ratio does not contain 1.0.[3]
Extreme care must be taken to avoid contamination of any step involving DNA, especially with the test DNA as contamination of the sample with normal DNA will skew results closer to 1.0, thus abnormalities may go undetected. FISH, PCR and flow cytometry experiments may be employed to confirm results.[4][12]
Array comparative genomic hybridization (also microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization, matrix CGH, array CGH, aCGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique for the detection of chromosomal copy number changes on a genome wide and high-resolution scale.[13] Array CGH compares the patient's genome against a reference genome and identifies differences between the two genomes, and hence locates regions of genomic imbalances in the patient, utilizing the same principles of competitive fluorescence in situ hybridization as traditional CGH.
With the introduction of array CGH, the main limitation of conventional CGH, a low resolution, is overcome. In array CGH, the metaphase chromosomes are replaced by cloned DNA fragments (+100200 kb) of which the exact chromosomal location is known. This allows the detection of aberrations in more detail and, moreover, makes it possible to map the changes directly onto the genomic sequence.[14]
Array CGH has proven to be a specific, sensitive, fast and highthroughput technique, with considerable advantages compared to other methods used for the analysis of DNA copy number changes making it more amenable to diagnostic applications. Using this method, copy number changes at a level of 510 kilobases of DNA sequences can be detected.[15] As of 2006[update], even high-resolution CGH (HR-CGH) arrays are accurate to detect structural variations (SV) at resolution of 200 bp.[16] This method allows one to identify new recurrent chromosome changes such as microdeletions and duplications in human conditions such as cancer and birth defects due to chromosome aberrations.
Array CGH is based on the same principle as conventional CGH. In both techniques, DNA from a reference (or control) sample and DNA from a test (or patient) sample are differentially labelled with two different fluorophores and used as probes that are cohybridized competitively onto nucleic acid targets. In conventional CGH, the target is a reference metaphase spread. In array CGH, these targets can be genomic fragments cloned in a variety of vectors (such as BACs or plasmids), cDNAs, or oligonucleotides.[17]
Figure 2.[14] is a schematic overview of the array CGH technique. DNA from the sample to be tested is labeled with a red fluorophore (Cyanine 5) and a reference DNA sample is labeled with green fluorophore (Cyanine 3). Equal quantities of the two DNA samples are mixed and cohybridized to a DNA microarray of several thousand evenly spaced cloned DNA fragments or oligonucleotides, which have been spotted in triplicate on the array. After hybridization, digital imaging systems are used to capture and quantify the relative fluorescence intensities of each of the hybridized fluorophores.[17] The resulting ratio of the fluorescence intensities is proportional to the ratio of the copy numbers of DNA sequences in the test and reference genomes. If the intensities of the flurochromes are equal on one probe, this region of the patient's genome is interpreted as having equal quantity of DNA in the test and reference samples; if there is an altered Cy3:Cy5 ratio this indicates a loss or a gain of the patient DNA at that specific genomic region.[18]
Array CGH has been implemented using a wide variety of techniques. Therefore, some of the advantages and limitations of array CGH are dependent on the technique chosen.The initial approaches used arrays produced from large insert genomic DNA clones, such as BACs. The use of BACs provides sufficient intense signals to detect single-copy changes and to locate aberration boundaries accurately. However, initial DNA yields of isolated BAC clones are low and DNA amplification techniques are necessary. These techniques include ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (PCR), degenerate primer PCR using one or several sets of primers, and rolling circle amplification.[19] Arrays can also be constructed using cDNA. These arrays currently yield a high spatial resolution, but the number of cDNAs is limited by the genes that are encoded on the chromosomes, and their sensitivity is low due to cross-hybridization.[14] This results in the inability to detect single copy changes on a genome wide scale.[20] The latest approach is spotting the arrays with short oligonucleotides. The amount of oligos is almost infinite, and the processing is rapid, cost-effective, and easy. Although oligonucleotides do not have the sensitivity to detect single copy changes, averaging of ratios from oligos that map next to each other on the chromosome can compensate for the reduced sensitivity.[21] It is also possible to use arrays which have overlapping probes so that specific breakpoints may be uncovered.
There are two approaches to the design of microarrays for CGH applications: whole genome and targeted.
Whole genome arrays are designed to cover the entire human genome. They often include clones that provide an extensive coverage across the genome; and arrays that have contiguous coverage, within the limits of the genome. Whole-genome arrays have been constructed mostly for research applications and have proven their outstanding worth in gene discovery. They are also very valuable in screening the genome for DNA gains and losses at an unprecedented resolution.[17]
Targeted arrays are designed for a specific region(s) of the genome for the purpose of evaluating that targeted segment. It may be designed to study a specific chromosome or chromosomal segment or to identify and evaluate specific DNA dosage abnormalities in individuals with suspected microdeletion syndromes or subtelomeric rearrangements. The crucial goal of a targeted microarray in medical practice is to provide clinically useful results for diagnosis, genetic counseling, prognosis, and clinical management of unbalanced cytogenetic abnormalities.[17]
Conventional CGH has been used mainly for the identification of chromosomal regions that are recurrently lost or gained in tumors, as well as for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer.[22] This approach can also be used to study chromosomal aberrations in fetal and neonatal genomes. Furthermore, conventional CGH can be used in detecting chromosomal abnormalities and have been shown to be efficient in diagnosing complex abnormalities associated with human genetic disorders.[14]
CGH data from several studies of the same tumor type show consistent patterns of non-random genetic aberrations.[23] Some of these changes appear to be common to various kinds of malignant tumors, while others are more tumor specific. For example, gains of chromosomal regions lq, 3q and 8q, as well as losses of 8p, 13q, 16q and 17p, are common to a number of tumor types, such as breast, ovarian, prostate, renal and bladder cancer (Figure. 3). Other alterations, such as 12p and Xp gains in testicular cancer, 13q gain 9q loss in bladder cancer, 14q loss in renal cancer and Xp loss in ovarian cancer are more specific, and might reflect the unique selection forces operating during cancer development in different organs.[23] Array CGH is also frequently used in research and diagnostics of B cell malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Cri du Chat (CdC) is a syndrome caused by a partial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 5.[24] Several studies have shown that conventional CGH is suitable to detect the deletion, as well as more complex chromosomal alterations. For example, Levy et al. (2002) reported an infant with a cat-like cry, the hallmark of CdC, but having an indistinct karyotype. CGH analysis revealed a loss of chromosomal material from 5p15.3 confirming the diagnosis clinically. These results demonstrate that conventional CGH is a reliable technique in detecting structural aberrations and, in specific cases, may be more efficient in diagnosing complex abnormalities.[24]
Array CGH applications are mainly directed at detecting genomic abnormalities in cancer. However, array CGH is also suitable for the analysis of DNA copy number aberrations that cause human genetic disorders.[14] That is, array CGH is employed to uncover deletions, amplifications, breakpoints and ploidy abnormalities. Earlier diagnosis is of benefit to the patient as they may undergo appropriate treatments and counseling to improve their prognosis.[10]
Genetic alterations and rearrangements occur frequently in cancer and contribute to its pathogenesis. Detecting these aberrations by array CGH provides information on the locations of important cancer genes and can have clinical use in diagnosis, cancer classification and prognostification.[17] However, not all of the losses of genetic material are pathogenetic, since some DNA material is physiologically lost during the rearrangement of immunoglobulin subgenes. In a recent study, array CGH has been implemented to identify regions of chromosomal aberration (copy-number variation) in several mouse models of breast cancer, leading to identification of cooperating genes during myc-induced oncogenesis.[25]
Array CGH may also be applied not only to the discovery of chromosomal abnormalities in cancer, but also to the monitoring of the progression of tumors. Differentiation between metastatic and mild lesions is also possible using FISH once the abnormalities have been identified by array CGH.[5][10]
PraderWilli syndrome (PWS) is a paternal structural abnormality involving 15q11-13, while a maternal aberration in the same region causes Angelman syndrome (AS). In both syndromes, the majority of cases (75%) are the result of a 35 Mb deletion of the PWS/AS critical region.[26] These small aberrations cannot be detected using cytogenetics or conventional CGH, but can be readily detected using array CGH. As a proof of principle Vissers et al. (2003) constructed a genome wide array with a 1 Mb resolution to screen three patients with known, FISH-confirmed microdeletion syndromes, including one with PWS. In all three cases, the abnormalities, ranging from 1.5 to 2.9Mb, were readily identified.[27] Thus, array CGH was demonstrated to be a specific and sensitive approach in detecting submicroscopic aberrations.
When using overlapping microarrays, it is also possible to uncover breakpoints involved in chromosomal aberrations.
Though not yet a widely employed technique, the use of array CGH as a tool for preimplantation genetic screening is becoming an increasingly popular concept. It has the potential to detect CNVs and aneuploidy in eggs, sperm or embryos which may contribute to failure of the embryo to successfully implant, miscarriage or conditions such as Down syndrome (trisomy 21). This makes array CGH a promising tool to reduce the incidence of life altering conditions and improve success rates of IVF attempts. The technique involves whole genome amplification from a single cell which is then used in the array CGH method. It may also be used in couples carrying chromosomal translocations such as balanced reciprocal translocations or Robertsonian translocations, which have the potential to cause chromosomal imbalances in their offspring.[12][28][29]
A main disadvantage of conventional CGH is its inability to detect structural chromosomal aberrations without copy number changes, such as mosaicism, balanced chromosomal translocations, and inversions. CGH can also only detect gains and losses relative to the ploidy level.[30] In addition, chromosomal regions with short repetitive DNA sequences are highly variable between individuals and can interfere with CGH analysis.[14] Therefore, repetitive DNA regions like centromeres and telomeres need to be blocked with unlabeled repetitive DNA (e.g. Cot1 DNA) and/or can be omitted from screening.[31] Furthermore, the resolution of conventional CGH is a major practical problem that limits its clinical applications. Although CGH has proven to be a useful and reliable technique in the research and diagnostics of both cancer and human genetic disorders, the applications involve only gross abnormalities. Because of the limited resolution of metaphase chromosomes, aberrations smaller than 510 Mb cannot be detected using conventional CGH.[23]For the detection of such abnormalities, a high-resolution technique is required.Array CGH overcomes many of these limitations. Array CGH is characterized by a high resolution, its major advantage with respect to conventional CGH. The standard resolution varies between 1 and 5 Mb, but can be increased up to approximately 40 kb by supplementing the array with extra clones. However, as in conventional CGH, the main disadvantage of array CGH is its inability to detect aberrations that do not result in copy number changes and is limited in its ability to detect mosaicism.[14] The level of mosaicism that can be detected is dependent on the sensitivity and spatial resolution of the clones. At present, rearrangements present in approximately 50% of the cells is the detection limit. For the detection of such abnormalities, other techniques, such as SKY (Spectral karyotyping) or FISH have to still be used.[32]
Original post:
Comments Off on Comparative genomic hybridization – Wikipedia
Right axis deviation – Wikipedia
Posted: at 5:07 am
Medical condition
The electrical axis of the heart is the net direction in which the wave of depolarization travels. It is measured using an electrocardiogram (ECG). Normally, this begins at the sinoatrial node (SA node); from here the wave of depolarisation travels down to the apex of the heart. The hexaxial reference system can be used to visualise the directions in which the depolarisation wave may travel.
On a hexaxial diagram (see figure 1):
RAD is an ECG finding that arises either as an anatomically normal variant or an indicator of underlying pathology.
There are often no symptoms for RAD and it is usually found by chance during an ECG. Many of the symptoms exhibited by patients with RAD are associated with its different causes. The table below displays the four most common causes and the signs, symptoms and risk factors associated with it.[citation needed]
Chest pain
Fatigue
Shortness of breath[1]
Obesity
Gender
Hypertension
Diabetes
Physical activity
Age
Alcohol
Dizziness
Fainting
Pulmonary hypertension
Mitral stenosis
Pulmonary embolism
Congenital heart disease
Arrythmogenic right ventricle cardiomyopathy
Fainting
Palpitations[3]
Drug toxicity (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants[5])
Hyperkalaemia
Blockage of the left posterior fascicle would lead to activation of the anterior portion of the left ventricle followed by activation of the rest of the ventricle in a superior to inferior direction and directed towards the right. This would lead to right axis deviation findings on an ECG.[6]Bifascicular block is a combination of right bundle branch block and either left anterior fascicular block or left posterior fascicular block. Conduction to the ventricle would therefore be via the remaining fascicle. The ECG will show typical features of RBBB plus either left or right axis deviation.[7][8]
The lateral wall of the left ventricle is supplied by branches of the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCx) arteries.[8] Infarction of the lateral wall will thus lead to deviation of the axis away from the site of infarction.[9]
Increased thickness of the right ventricle leads to right axis deviation[citation needed]
Pre-excitation refers to early activation of the ventricles due to impulses bypassing the AV node via an accessory pathway.[10]Accessory pathways are abnormal conduction pathways formed during cardiac development. An example of pre-excitation syndromes is Wolff Parkinson White syndrome. Here, the presence of a left lateral accessory pathway leads to right-axis deviation.[11]
Fascicular tachycardia usually arises from the posterior fascicle of the left bundle branch. They produce QRS complexes of relatively short durations with a right bundle branch block pattern. Tachycardias originating in the anterior left fascicle would lead to right axis deviation.[citation needed]
Right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia originates from the outflow tract of the right ventricle or the tricuspid annulus. As it arises from the right ventricle, the impulse spreads inferiorly from beneath the pulmonary valve, and there right axis deviation.[12]
Ventricular ectopy is when the heartbeat is an abnormal heartbeat where the QRS complex is significantly wider. When the origin of the ectopic heartbeat is in the anterior fascicule then there is right axis deviation.[13]
The pathophysiology depends on the specific cause of right axis deviation. Most causes can be attributed to one of four main mechanisms.[14][15] These include right ventricular hypertrophy, reduced muscle mass of left ventricle, altered conduction pathways and change in the position of the heart in the chest.[citation needed]
Enlargement of right ventricular myocardial mass can result in right axis deviation. There are 2 main reasons for this mechanism.[15] Firstly, more muscle mass will result in greater amplitude of depolarisation of that side of the heart.[15] Secondly, depolarisation of the heart will be slower through the right ventricle relative to the left, and therefore the effects of the right ventricle on the axis of the heart will be dominant.[15]
Decrease in myocardial mass of the left ventricle will shift the balance of depolarisation towards the right. For example, scarring and atrophy caused by ischaemia of the left ventricle will cause depolarisation of the left side of the heart to be less forceful.[15] Hence, depolarisation of the right ventricle will be greater in amplitude than left, shifting the axis to the right.[citation needed]
Changes in the conduction pathways of the heart can result in right axis deviation. For example, an accessory pathway from the left atrium to the left ventricle, as in Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome, will result in the left ventricle finishing depolarisation earlier than the right.[16] Hence, the right ventricle will have more of an effect on the axis of the heart.[citation needed]
The apex of the heart is normally orientated towards the left. A more vertical orientation of the heart, shifts the axis to the right. Physiologically, this can occur in tall and thin individuals.[16] Pathologically, conditions such as a left-sided pneumothorax and lung hyperinflation (e.g. COPD)[17] can cause rightwards displacement of the heart. The congenital condition of dextrocardia results in right axis deviation.
In general, a positive (upwards) deflection of an ECG trace demonstrates an electrical activity that moves towards the measuring electrode, whereas a negative (downwards) deflection of an ECG trace demonstrates an electrical activity that moves away from the measuring electrode. The electrical heart axis can be estimated from the ECG by using the quadrant method or degree method.[18]
A simple tool to quickly identify axis deviation (Figure 3) is the popular mnemonic; Reaching for Right Axis Deviation and Leaving for Left Axis Deviation. This refers to the appearance of leads I and III. If the QRS complex is negative in lead I and positive in lead III, the QRS complexes appear to be "reaching" to touch each other. This signifies right axis deviation. Conversely, if the QRS complex is positive in lead I and negative in lead III. the leads have the appearance of "leaving" each other. If the QRS complex in lead II is also negative, this confirms a left axis deviation.[citation needed]
See the original post:
Comments Off on Right axis deviation – Wikipedia
Isolating, Cloning, and Sequencing DNA – Molecular Biology of the Cell …
Posted: at 5:07 am
Until the early 1970s DNA was the most difficult cellular molecule for the biochemist to analyze. Enormously long and chemically monotonous, the string of nucleotides that forms the genetic material of an organism could be examined only indirectly, by protein or RNA sequencing or by genetic analysis. Today the situation has changed entirely. From being the most difficult macromolecule of the cell to analyze, DNA has become the easiest. It is now possible to isolate a specific region of a genome, to produce a virtually unlimited number of copies of it, and to determine the sequence of its nucleotides overnight. At the height of the Human Genome Project, large facilities with automated machines were generating DNA sequences at the rate of 1000 nucleotides per second, around the clock. By related techniques, an isolated gene can be altered (engineered) at will and transferred back into the germ line of an animal or plant, so as to become a functional and heritable part of the organism's genome.
These technical breakthroughs in genetic engineeringthe ability to manipulate DNA with precision in a test tube or an organismhave had a dramatic impact on all aspects of cell biology by facilitating the study of cells and their macromolecules in previously unimagined ways. They have led to the discovery of whole new classes of genes and proteins, while revealing that many proteins have been much more highly conserved in evolution than had been suspected. They have provided new tools for determining the functions of proteins and of individual domains within proteins, revealing a host of unexpected relationships between them. By making available large amounts of any protein, they have shown the way to efficient mass production of protein hormones and vaccines. Finally, by allowing the regulatory regions of genes to be dissected, they provide biologists with an important tool for unraveling the complex regulatory networks by which eucaryotic gene expression is controlled.
Recombinant DNA technology comprises a mixture of techniques, some new and some borrowed from other fields such as microbial genetics (). Central to the technology are the following key techniques:
Some Major Steps in the Development of Recombinant DNA and Transgenic Technology.
Cleavage of DNA at specific sites by restriction nucleases, which greatly facilitates the isolation and manipulation of individual genes.
DNA cloning either through the use of cloning vectors or the polymerase chain reaction, whereby a single DNA molecule can be copied to generate many billions of identical molecules.
Nucleic acid hybridization, which makes it possible to find a specific sequence of DNA or RNA with great accuracy and sensitivity on the basis of its ability to bind a complementary nucleic acid sequence.
Rapid sequencing of all the nucleotides in a purified DNA fragment, which makes it possible to identify genes and to deduce the amino acid sequence of the proteins they encode.
Simultaneous monitoring of the expression level of each gene in a cell, using nucleic acid microarrays that allow tens of thousands of hybridization reactions to be performed simultaneously.
In this chapter we describe each of these basic techniques, which together have revolutionized the study of cell biology.
Unlike a protein, a gene does not exist as a discrete entity in cells, but rather as a small region of a much longer DNA molecule. Although the DNA molecules in a cell can be randomly broken into small pieces by mechanical force, a fragment containing a single gene in a mammalian genome would still be only one among a hundred thousand or more DNA fragments, indistinguishable in their average size. How could such a gene be purified? Because all DNA molecules consist of an approximately equal mixture of the same four nucleotides, they cannot be readily separated, as proteins can, on the basis of their different charges and binding properties. Moreover, even if a purification scheme could be devised, vast amounts of DNA would be needed to yield enough of any particular gene to be useful for further experiments.
The solution to all of these problems began to emerge with the discovery of restriction nucleases. These enzymes, which can be purified from bacteria, cut the DNA double helix at specific sites defined by the local nucleotide sequence, thereby cleaving a long double-stranded DNA molecule into fragments of strictly defined sizes. Different restriction nucleases have different sequence specificities, and it is relatively simple to find an enzyme that can create a DNA fragment that includes a particular gene. The size of the DNA fragment can then be used as a basis for partial purification of the gene from a mixture.
Different species of bacteria make different restriction nucleases, which protect them from viruses by degrading incoming viral DNA. Each nuclease recognizes a specific sequence of four to eight nucleotides in DNA. These sequences, where they occur in the genome of the bacterium itself, are protected from cleavage by methylation at an A or a C residue; the sequences in foreign DNA are generally not methylated and so are cleaved by the restriction nucleases. Large numbers of restriction nucleases have been purified from various species of bacteria; several hundred, most of which recognize different nucleotide sequences, are now available commercially.
Some restriction nucleases produce staggered cuts, which leave short single-stranded tails at the two ends of each fragment (). Ends of this type are known as cohesive ends, as each tail can form complementary base pairs with the tail at any other end produced by the same enzyme (). The cohesive ends generated by restriction enzymes allow any two DNA fragments to be easily joined together, as long as the fragments were generated with the same restriction nuclease (or with another nuclease that produces the same cohesive ends). DNA molecules produced by splicing together two or more DNA fragments are called recombinant DNA molecules; they have made possible many new types of cell-biological studies.
The DNA nucleotide sequences recognized by four widely used restriction nucleases. As in the examples shown, such sequences are often six base pairs long and palindromic (that is, the nucleotide sequence is the same if the helix is turned (more...)
Restriction nucleases produce DNA fragments that can be easily joined together. Fragments with the same cohesive ends can readily join by complementary base-pairing between their cohesive ends, as illustrated. The two DNA fragments that join in this example (more...)
The length and purity of DNA molecules can be accurately determined by the same types of gel electrophoresis methods that have proved so useful in the analysis of proteins. The procedure is actually simpler than for proteins: because each nucleotide in a nucleic acid molecule already carries a single negative charge, there is no need to add the negatively charged detergent SDS that is required to make protein molecules move uniformly toward the positive electrode. For DNA fragments less than 500 nucleotides long, specially designed polyacrylamide gels allow separation of molecules that differ in length by as little as a single nucleotide (). The pores in polyacrylamide gels, however, are too small to permit very large DNA molecules to pass; to separate these by size, the much more porous gels formed by dilute solutions of agarose (a polysaccharide isolated from seaweed) are used (). These DNA separation methods are widely used for both analytical and preparative purposes.
Gel electrophoresis techniques for separating DNA molecules by size. In the three examples shown, electrophoresis is from top to bottom, so that the largestand thus slowest-movingDNA molecules are near the top of the gel. In (A) a polyacrylamide (more...)
A variation of agarose gel electrophoresis, called pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, makes it possible to separate even extremely long DNA molecules. Ordinary gel electrophoresis fails to separate such molecules because the steady electric field stretches them out so that they travel end-first through the gel in snakelike configurations at a rate that is independent of their length. In pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, by contrast, the direction of the electric field is changed periodically, which forces the molecules to reorient before continuing to move snakelike through the gel. This reorientation takes much more time for larger molecules, so that longer molecules move more slowly than shorter ones. As a consequence, even entire bacterial or yeast chromosomes separate into discrete bands in pulsed-field gels and so can be sorted and identified on the basis of their size (). Although a typical mammalian chromosome of 108 base pairs is too large to be sorted even in this way, large segments of these chromosomes are readily separated and identified if the chromosomal DNA is first cut with a restriction nuclease selected to recognize sequences that occur only rarely (once every 10,000 or more nucleotide pairs).
The DNA bands on agarose or polyacrylamide gels are invisible unless the DNA is labeled or stained in some way. One sensitive method of staining DNA is to expose it to the dye ethidium bromide, which fluoresces under ultraviolet light when it is bound to DNA (see ,). An even more sensitive detection method incorporates a radioisotope into the DNA molecules before electrophoresis; 32P is often used as it can be incorporated into DNA phosphates and emits an energetic particle that is easily detected by autoradiography (as in ).
Two procedures are widely used to label isolated DNA molecules. In the first method a DNA polymerase copies the DNA in the presence of nucleotides that are either radioactive (usually labeled with 32P) or chemically tagged (). In this way DNA probes containing many labeled nucleotides can be produced for nucleic acid hybridization reactions (discussed below). The second procedure uses the bacteriophage enzyme polynucleotide kinase to transfer a single 32P-labeled phosphate from ATP to the 5 end of each DNA chain (). Because only one 32P atom is incorporated by the kinase into each DNA strand, the DNA molecules labeled in this way are often not radioactive enough to be used as DNA probes; because they are labeled at only one end, however, they have been invaluable for other applications including DNA footprinting, as we see shortly.
Methods for labeling DNA molecules in vitro. (A) A purified DNA polymerase enzyme labels all the nucleotides in a DNA molecule and can thereby produce highly radioactive DNA probes. (B) Polynucleotide kinase labels only the 5 ends of DNA strands; (more...)
Today, radioactive labeling methods are being replaced by labeling with molecules that can be detected chemically or through fluorescence. To produce such nonradioactive DNA molecules, specially modified nucleotide precursors are used (). A DNAmolecule made in this way is allowed to bind to its complementary DNA sequence by hybridization, as discussed in the next section, and is then detected with an antibody (or other ligand) that specifically recognizes its modified side chain (see ).
Here, six different DNA probes have been used to mark the location of their respective nucleotide sequences on human chromosome 5 at metaphase. The probes have been chemically labeled and detected with fluorescent antibodies. Both copies of chromosome (more...)
When an aqueous solution of DNA is heated at 100C or exposed to a very high pH (pH 13), the complementary base pairs that normally hold the two strands of the double helix together are disrupted and the double helix rapidly dissociates into two single strands. This process, called DNA denaturation, was for many years thought to be irreversible. In 1961, however, it was discovered that complementary single strands of DNA readily re-form double helices by a process called hybridization (also called DNA renaturation) if they are kept for a prolonged period at 65C. Similar hybridization reactions can occur between any two single-stranded nucleic acid chains (DNA/DNA, RNA/RNA, or RNA/DNA), provided that they have complementary nucleotide sequences. These specific hybridization reactions are widely used to detect and characterize specific nucleotide sequences in both RNA and DNA molecules.
Single-stranded DNA molecules used to detect complementary sequences are known as probes; these molecules, which carry radioactive or chemical markers to facilitate their detection, can be anywhere from fifteen to thousands of nucleotides long. Hybridization reactions using DNA probes are so sensitive and selective that they can detect complementary sequences present at a concentration as low as one molecule per cell. It is thus possible to determine how many copies of any DNA sequence are present in a particular DNA sample. The same technique can be used to search for related but nonidentical genes. To find a gene of interest in an organism whose genome has not yet been sequenced, for example, a portion of a known gene can be used as a probe ().
Different hybridization conditions allow less than perfect DNA matching. When only an identical match with a DNA probe is desired, the hybridization reaction is kept just a few degrees below the temperature at which a perfect DNA helix denatures in the (more...)
Alternatively, DNA probes can be used in hybridization reactions with RNA rather than DNA to find out whether a cell is expressing a given gene. In this case a DNA probe that contains part of the gene's sequence is hybridized with RNA purified from the cell in question to see whether the RNA includes molecules matching the probe DNA and, if so, in what quantities. In somewhat more elaborate procedures the DNA probe is treated with specific nucleases after the hybridization is complete, to determine the exact regions of the DNA probe that have paired with cellular RNA molecules. One can thereby determine the start and stop sites for RNA transcription, as well as the precise boundaries of the intron and exon sequences in a gene ().
The use of nucleic acid hybridization to determine the region of a cloned DNA fragment that is present in an mRNA molecule. The method shown requires a nuclease that cuts the DNA chain only where it is not base-paired to a complementary RNA chain. The (more...)
Today, the positions of intron/exon boundaries are usually determined by sequencing the cDNA sequences that represent the mRNAs expressed in a cell. Comparing this expressed sequence with the sequence of the whole gene reveals where the introns lie. We review later how cDNAs are prepared from mRNAs.
We have seen that genes are switched on and off as a cell encounters new signals in its environment. The hybridization of DNA probes to cellular RNAs allows one to determine whether or not a particular gene is being transcribed; moreover, when the expression of a gene changes, one can determine whether the change is due to transcriptional or posttranscriptional controls (see ). These tests of gene expression were initially performed with one DNA probe at a time. DNA microarrays now allow the simultaneous monitoring of hundreds or thousands of genes at a time, as we discuss later. Hybridization methods are in such wide use in cell biology today that it is difficult to imagine how we could study gene structure and expression without them.
DNA probes are often used to detect, in a complex mixture of nucleic acids, only those molecules with sequences that are complementary to all or part of the probe. Gel electrophoresis can be used to fractionate the many different RNA or DNA molecules in a crude mixture according to their size before the hybridization reaction is performed; if molecules of only one or a few sizes become labeled with the probe, one can be certain that the hybridization was indeed specific. Moreover, the size information obtained can be invaluable in itself. An example illustrates this point.
Suppose that one wishes to determine the nature of the defect in a mutant mouse that produces abnormally low amounts of albumin, a protein that liver cells normally secrete into the blood in large amounts. First, one collects identical samples of liver tissue from mutant and normal mice (the latter serving as controls) and disrupts the cells in a strong detergent to inactivate cellular nucleases that might otherwise degrade the nucleic acids. Next, one separates the RNA and DNA from all of the other cell components: the proteins present are completely denatured and removed by repeated extractions with phenola potent organic solvent that is partly miscible with water; the nucleic acids, which remain in the aqueous phase, are then precipitated with alcohol to separate them from the small molecules of the cell. Then one separates the DNA from the RNA by their different solubilities in alcohols and degrades any contaminating nucleic acid of the unwanted type by treatment with a highly specific enzymeeither an RNase or a DNase. The mRNAs are typically separated from bulk RNA by retention on a chromatography column that specifically binds the poly-A tails of mRNAs.
To analyze the albumin-encoding mRNAs with a DNA probe, a technique called Northern blotting is used. First, the intact mRNA molecules purified from mutant and control liver cells are fractionated on the basis of their sizes into a series of bands by gel electrophoresis. Then, to make the RNA molecules accessible to DNA probes, a replica of the pattern of RNA bands on the gel is made by transferring (blotting) the fractionated RNA molecules onto a sheet of nitrocellulose or nylon paper. The paper is then incubated in a solution containing a labeled DNA probe whose sequence corresponds to part of the template strand that produces albumin mRNA. The RNA molecules that hybridize to the labeled DNA probe on the paper (because they are complementary to part of the normal albumin gene sequence) are then located by detecting the bound probe by autoradiography or by chemical means (). The size of the RNA molecules in each band that binds the probe can be determined by reference to bands of RNA molecules of known sizes (RNA standards) that are electrophoresed side by side with the experimental sample. In this way one might discover that liver cells from the mutant mice make albumin RNA in normal amounts and of normal size; alternatively, albumin RNA of normal size might be detected in greatly reduced amounts. Another possibility is that the mutant albumin RNA molecules might be abnormally short and therefore move unusually quickly through the gel; in this case the gel blot could be retested with a series of shorter DNA probes, each corresponding to small portions of the gene, to reveal which part of the normal RNA is missing.
Detection of specific RNA or DNA molecules by gel-transfer hybridization. In this example, the DNA probe is detected by its radioactivity. DNA probes detected by chemical or fluorescence methods are also widely used (see Figure 8-24). (A) A mixture of (more...)
An analogous gel-transfer hybridization method, called Southern blotting, analyzes DNA rather than RNA. Isolated DNA is first cut into readily separable fragments with restriction nucleases. The double-stranded fragments are then separated on the basis of size by gel electrophoresis, and those complementary to a DNA probe are identified by blotting and hybridization, as just described for RNA (see ). To characterize the structure of the albumin gene in the mutant mice, an albumin-specific DNA probe would be used to construct a detailed restriction map of the genome in the region of the albumin gene. From this map one could determine if the albumin gene has been rearranged in the defective animalsfor example, by the deletion or the insertion of a short DNA sequence; most single base changes, however, could not be detected in this way.
Nucleic acids, no less than other macromolecules, occupy precise positions in cells and tissues, and a great deal of potential information is lost when these molecules are extracted by homogenization. For this reason, techniques have been developed in which nucleic acid probes are used in much the same way as labeled antibodies to locate specific nucleic acid sequences in situ, a procedure called in situhybridization. This procedure can now be done both for DNA in chromosomes and for RNA in cells. Labeled nucleic acid probes can be hybridized to chromosomes that have been exposed briefly to a very high pH to disrupt their DNA base pairs. The chromosomal regions that bind the probe during the hybridization step are then visualized. Originally, this technique was developed with highly radioactive DNA probes, which were detected by auto-radiography. The spatial resolution of the technique, however, can be greatly improved by labeling the DNA probes chemically () instead of radioactively, as described earlier.
In situ hybridization methods have also been developed that reveal the distribution of specific RNA molecules in cells in tissues. In this case the tissues are not exposed to a high pH, so the chromosomal DNA remains double-stranded and cannot bind the probe. Instead the tissue is gently fixed so that its RNA is retained in an exposed form that can hybridize when the tissue is incubated with a complementary DNA or RNA probe. In this way the patterns of differential gene expression can be observed in tissues, and the location of specific RNAs can be determined in cells (). In the Drosophila embryo, for example, such patterns have provided new insights into the mechanisms that create distinctions between cells in different positions during development (described in Chapter 21).
(A) Expression pattern of deltaC in the early zebrafish embryo. This gene codes for a ligand in the Notch signaling pathway (discussed in Chapter 15), and the pattern shown here reflects its role in the development of somitesthe future segments (more...)
Any DNA fragment that contains a gene of interest can be cloned. In cell biology, the term DNA cloning is used in two senses. In one sense it literally refers to the act of making many identical copies of a DNA moleculethe amplification of a particular DNA sequence. However, the term is also used to describe the isolation of a particular stretch of DNA (often a particular gene) from the rest of a cell's DNA, because this isolation is greatly facilitated by making many identical copies of the DNA of interest.
DNA cloning in its most general sense can be accomplished in several ways. The simplest involves inserting a particular fragment of DNA into the purified DNA genome of a self-replicating genetic elementgenerally a virus or a plasmid. A DNA fragment containing a human gene, for example, can be joined in a test tube to the chromosome of a bacterial virus, and the new recombinant DNA molecule can then be introduced into a bacterial cell. Starting with only one such recombinant DNA molecule that infects a single cell, the normal replication mechanisms of the virus can produce more than 1012 identical virus DNA molecules in less than a day, thereby amplifying the amount of the inserted human DNA fragment by the same factor. A virus or plasmid used in this way is known as a cloning vector, and the DNA propagated by insertion into it is said to have been cloned.
To isolate a specific gene, one often begins by constructing a DNA librarya comprehensive collection of cloned DNA fragments from a cell, tissue, or organism. This library includes (one hopes) at least one fragment that contains the gene of interest. Libraries can be constructed with either a virus or a plasmid vector and are generally housed in a population of bacterial cells. The principles underlying the methods used for cloning genes are the same for either type of cloning vector, although the details may differ. Today most cloning is performed with plasmid vectors.
The plasmid vectors most widely used for gene cloning are small circular molecules of double-stranded DNA derived from larger plasmids that occur naturally in bacterial cells. They generally account for only a minor fraction of the total host bacterial cell DNA, but they can easily be separated owing to their small size from chromosomal DNA molecules, which are large and precipitate as a pellet upon centrifugation. For use as cloning vectors, the purified plasmid DNA circles are first cut with a restriction nuclease to create linear DNA molecules. The cellular DNA to be used in constructing the library is cut with the same restriction nuclease, and the resulting restriction fragments (including those containing the gene to be cloned) are then added to the cut plasmids and annealed via their cohesive ends to form recombinant DNA circles. These recombinant molecules containing foreign DNA inserts are then covalently sealed with the enzyme DNA ligase ().
The insertion of a DNA fragment into a bacterial plasmid with the enzyme DNA ligase. The plasmid is cut open with a restriction nuclease (in this case one that produces cohesive ends) and is mixed with the DNA fragment to be cloned (which has been prepared (more...)
In the next step in preparing the library, the recombinant DNA circles are introduced into bacterial cells that have been made transiently permeable to DNA; such cells are said to be transfected with the plasmids. As these cells grow and divide, doubling in number every 30 minutes, the recombinant plasmids also replicate to produce an enormous number of copies of DNA circles containing the foreign DNA (). Many bacterial plasmids carry genes for antibiotic resistance, a property that can be exploited to select those cells that have been successfully transfected; if the bacteria are grown in the presence of the antibiotic, only cells containing plasmids will survive. Each original bacterial cell that was initially transfected contains, in general, a different foreign DNA insert; this insert is inherited by all of the progeny cells of that bacterium, which together form a small colony in a culture dish.
Purification and amplification of a specific DNA sequence by DNA cloning in a bacterium. To produce many copies of a particular DNA sequence, the fragment is first inserted into a plasmid vector, as shown in Figure 8-30. The resulting recombinant plasmid (more...)
For many years, plasmids were used to clone fragments of DNA of 1,000 to 30,000 nucleotide pairs. Larger DNA fragments are more difficult to handle and were harder to clone. Then researchers began to use yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs), which could handle very large pieces of DNA (). Today, new plasmid vectors based on the naturally occurring F plasmid of E. coli are used to clone DNA fragments of 300,000 to 1 million nucleotide pairs. Unlike smaller bacterial plasmids, the F plasmidand its derivative, the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)is present in only one or two copies per E. coli cell. The fact that BACs are kept in such low numbers in bacterial cells may contribute to their ability to maintain large cloned DNA sequences stably: with only a few BACs present, it is less likely that the cloned DNA fragments will become scrambled due to recombination with sequences carried on other copies of the plasmid. Because of their stability, ability to accept large DNA inserts, and ease of handling, BACs are now the preferred vector for building DNA libraries of complex organismsincluding those representing the human and mouse genomes.
The making of a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC). A YAC vector allows the cloning of very large DNA molecules. TEL, CEN, and ORI are the telomere, centromere, and origin of replication sequences, respectively, for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (more...)
Cleaving the entire genome of a cell with a specific restriction nuclease and cloning each fragment as just described is sometimes called the shotgun approach to gene cloning. This technique can produce a very large number of DNA fragmentson the order of a million for a mammalian genomewhich will generate millions of different colonies of transfected bacterial cells. (When working with BACs rather than typical plasmids, larger fragments can be inserted, so fewer transfected bacterial cells are required to cover the genome.) Each of these colonies is composed of a clone of cells derived from a single ancestor cell, and therefore harbors many copies of a particular stretch of the fragmented genome (). Such a plasmid is said to contain a genomic DNA clone, and the entire collection of plasmids is called a genomic DNA library. But because the genomic DNA is cut into fragments at random, only some fragments contain genes. Many of the genomic DNA clones obtained from the DNA of a higher eucaryotic cell contain only noncoding DNA, which, as we discussed in Chapter 4, makes up most of the DNA in such genomes.
Construction of a human genomic DNA library. A genomic library is usually stored as a set of bacteria, each carrying a different fragment of human DNA. For simplicity, cloning of just a few representative fragments (colored) is shown. In reality, all (more...)
An alternative strategy is to begin the cloning process by selecting only those DNA sequences that are transcribed into mRNA and thus are presumed to correspond to protein-encoding genes. This is done by extracting the mRNA (or a purified subfraction of the mRNA) from cells and then making a complementary DNA (cDNA) copy of each mRNA molecule present; this reaction is catalyzed by the reverse transcriptase enzyme of retroviruses, which synthesizes a DNA chain on an RNA template. The single-stranded DNA molecules synthesized by the reverse transcriptase are converted into double-stranded DNA molecules by DNA polymerase, and these molecules are inserted into a plasmid or virus vector and cloned (). Each clone obtained in this way is called a cDNA clone, and the entire collection of clones derived from one mRNA preparation constitutes a cDNA library.
The synthesis of cDNA. Total mRNA is extracted from a particular tissue, and DNA copies (cDNA) of the mRNA molecules are produced by the enzyme reverse transcriptase (see p. 289). For simplicity, the copying of just one of these mRNAs into cDNA is illustrated. (more...)
There are important differences between genomic DNA clones and cDNA clones, as illustrated in . Genomic clones represent a random sample of all of the DNA sequences in an organism and, with very rare exceptions, are the same regardless of the cell type used to prepare them. By contrast, cDNA clones contain only those regions of the genome that have been transcribed into mRNA. Because the cells of different tissues produce distinct sets of mRNA molecules, a distinct cDNA library is obtained for each type of cell used to prepare the library.
The differences between cDNA clones and genomic DNA clones derived from the same region of DNA. In this example gene A is infrequently transcribed, whereas gene B is frequently transcribed, and both genes contain introns (green). In the genomic DNA library, (more...)
The use of a cDNA library for gene cloning has several advantages. First, some proteins are produced in very large quantities by specialized cells. In this case, the mRNA encoding the protein is likely to be produced in such large quantities that a cDNA library prepared from the cells is highly enriched for the cDNA molecules encoding the protein, greatly reducing the problem of identifying the desired clone in the library (see ). Hemoglobin, for example, is made in large amounts by developing erythrocytes (red blood cells); for this reason the globin genes were among the first to be cloned.
By far the most important advantage of cDNA clones is that they contain the uninterrupted coding sequence of a gene. As we have seen, eucaryotic genes usually consist of short coding sequences of DNA (exons) separated by much longer noncoding sequences (introns); the production of mRNA entails the removal of the noncoding sequences from the initial RNA transcript and the splicing together of the coding sequences. Neither bacterial nor yeast cells will make these modifications to the RNA produced from a gene of a higher eucaryotic cell. Thus, when the aim of the cloning is either to deduce the amino acid sequence of the protein from the DNA sequence or to produce the protein in bulk by expressing the cloned gene in a bacterial or yeast cell, it is much preferable to start with cDNA.
Genomic and cDNA libraries are inexhaustible resources that are widely shared among investigators. Today, many such libraries are also available from commercial sources.
In the late 1970s methods were developed that allowed the nucleotide sequence of any purified DNA fragment to be determined simply and quickly. They have made it possible to determine the complete DNA sequences of tens of thousands of genes, and many organisms have had their DNA genomes fully sequenced (see Table 1-1, p. 20). The volume of DNA sequence information is now so large (many tens of billions of nucleotides) that powerful computers must be used to store and analyze it.
Large volume DNA sequencing was made possible through the development in the mid-1970s of the dideoxy method for sequencing DNA, which is based on in vitro DNA synthesis performed in the presence of chain-terminating dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates ().
The enzymaticor dideoxymethod of sequencing DNA. (A) This method relies on the use of dideoxyribonucleoside triphosphates, derivatives of the normal deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates that lack the 3 hydroxyl group. (B) Purified (more...)
Although the same basic method is still used today, many improvements have been made. DNA sequencing is now completely automated: robotic devices mix the reagents and then load, run, and read the order of the nucleotide bases from the gel. This is facilitated by using chain-terminating nucleotides that are each labeled with a different colored fluorescent dye; in this case, all four synthesis reactions can be performed in the same tube, and the products can be separated in a single lane of a gel. A detector positioned near the bottom of the gel reads and records the color of the fluorescent label on each band as it passes through a laser beam (). A computer then reads and stores this nucleotide sequence.
Automated DNA sequencing. Shown here is a tiny part of the data from an automated DNA-sequencing run as it appears on the computer screen. Each colored peak represents a nucleotide in the DNA sequencea clear stretch of nucleotide sequence can (more...)
Now that DNA sequencing is so rapid and reliable, it has become the preferred method for determining, indirectly, the amino acid sequences of most proteins. Given a nucleotide sequence that encodes a protein, the procedure is quite straightforward. Although in principle there are six different reading frames in which a DNA sequence can be translated into protein (three on each strand), the correct one is generally recognizable as the only one lacking frequent stop codons (). As we saw when we discussed the genetic code in Chapter 6, a random sequence of nucleotides, read in frame, will encode a stop signal for protein synthesis about once every 20 amino acids. Those nucleotide sequences that encode a stretch of amino acids much longer than this are candidates for presumptive exons, and they can be translated (by computer) into amino acid sequences and checked against databases for similarities to known proteins from other organisms. If necessary, a limited amount of amino acid sequence can then be determined from the purified protein to confirm the sequence predicted from the DNA.
Finding the regions in a DNA sequence that encode a protein. (A) Any region of the DNA sequence can, in principle, code for six different amino acid sequences, because any one of three different reading frames can be used to interpret the nucleotide sequence (more...)
The problem comes, however, in determining which nucleotide sequenceswithin a whole genome sequencerepresent genes that encode proteins. Identifying genes is easiest when the DNA sequence is from a bacterial or archeal chromosome, which lacks introns, or from a cDNA clone. The location of genes in these nucleotide sequences can be predicted by examining the DNA for certain distinctive features (discussed in Chapter 6). Briefly these genes that encode proteins are identified by searching the nucleotide sequence for open reading frames (ORFs) that begin with an initiation codon, usually ATG, and end with a termination codon, TAA, TAG, or TGA. To minimize errors, computers used to search for ORFs are often directed to count as genes only those sequences that are longer than, say, 100 codons in length.
For more complex genomes, such as those of eucaryotes, the process is complicated by the presence of large introns embedded within the coding portion of genes. In many multicellular organisms, including humans, the average exon is only 150 nucleotides long. Thus in eucaryotes, one must also search for other features that signal the presence of a gene, for example, sequences that signal an intron/exon boundary or distinctive upstream regulatory regions.
A second major approach to identifying the coding regions in chromosomes is through the characterization of the nucleotide sequences of the detectable mRNAs (in the form of cDNAs). The mRNAs (and the cDNAs produced from them) lack introns, regulatory DNA sequences, and the nonessential spacer DNA that lies between genes. It is therefore useful to sequence large numbers of cDNAs to produce a very large collection (called a database) of the coding sequences of an organism. These sequences are then readily used to distinguish the exons from the introns in the long chromosomal DNA sequences that correspond to genes.
Finally, nucleotide sequences that are conserved between closely related organisms usually encode proteins. Comparison of these conserved sequences in different species can also provide insight into the function of a particular protein or gene, as we see later in the chapter.
Owing in large part to the automation of DNA sequencing, the genomes of many organisms have been fully sequenced; these include plant chloroplasts and animal mitochondria, large numbers of bacteria and archea, and many of the model organisms that are studied routinely in the laboratory, including several yeasts, a nematode worm, the fruit fly Drosophila, the model plant Arabidopsis, the mouse, and, last but not least, humans. Researchers have also deduced the complete DNA sequences for a wide variety of human pathogens. These include the bacteria that cause cholera, tuberculosis, syphilis, gonorrhea, Lyme disease, and stomach ulcers, as well as hundreds of virusesincluding smallpox virus and Epstein-Barr virus (which causes infectious mononucleosis). Examination of the genomes of these pathogens should provide clues about what makes them virulent, and will also point the way to new and more effective treatments.
Haemophilus influenzae (a bacterium that can cause ear infections or meningitis in children) was the first organism to have its complete genome sequenceall 1.8 million nucleotidesdetermined by the shotgun sequencing method, the most common strategy used today. In the shotgun method, long sequences of DNA are broken apart randomly into many shorter fragments. Each fragment is then sequenced and a computer is used to order these pieces into a whole chromosome or genome, using sequence overlap to guide the assembly. The shotgun method is the technique of choice for sequencing small genomes. Although larger, more repetitive genome sequences are more tricky to assemble, the shotgun method has been useful for sequencing the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, mouse, and human.
With new sequences appearing at a steadily accelerating pace in the scientific literature, comparison of the complete genome sequences of different organisms allows us to trace the evolutionary relationships among genes and organisms, and to discover genes and predict their functions. Assigning functions to genes often involves comparing their sequences with related sequences from model organisms that have been well characterized in the laboratory, such as the bacterium E. coli, the yeasts S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, the nematode worm C. elegans, and the fruit fly Drosophila (discussed in Chapter 1).
Although the organisms whose genomes have been sequenced share many cellular pathways and possess many proteins that are homologous in their amino acid sequences or structure, the functions of a very large number of newly identified proteins remain unknown. Some 1540% of the proteins encoded by these sequenced genomes do not resemble any other protein that has been characterized functionally. This observation underscores one of the limitations of the emerging field of genomics: although comparative analysis of genomes reveals a great deal of information about the relationships between genes and organisms, it often does not provide immediate information about how these genes function, or what roles they have in the physiology of an organism. Comparison of the full gene complement of several thermophilic bacteria, for example, does not reveal why these bacteria thrive at temperatures exceeding 70C. And examination of the genome of the incredibly radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans does not explain how this organism can survive a blast of radiation that can shatter glass. Further biochemical and genetic studies, like those described in the final sections of this chapter, are required to determine how genes function in the context of living organisms.
Now that so many genome sequences are available, genes can be cloned directly without the need to construct DNA libraries first. A technique called the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) makes this rapid cloning possible. PCR allows the DNA from a selected region of a genome to be amplified a billionfold, effectively purifying this DNA away from the remainder of the genome.
Two sets of DNA oligonucleotides, chosen to flank the desired nucleotide sequence of the gene, are synthesized by chemical methods. These oligonucleotides are then used to prime DNA synthesis on single strands generated by heating the DNA from the entire genome. The newly synthesized DNA is produced in a reaction catalyzed in vitro by a purified DNA polymerase, and the primers remain at the 5 ends of the final DNA fragments that are made ().
Amplification of DNA using the PCR technique. Knowledge of the DNA sequence to be amplified is used to design two synthetic DNA oligonucleotides, each complementary to the sequence on one strand of the DNA double helix at opposite ends of the region to (more...)
Nothing special is produced in the first cycle of DNA synthesis; the power of the PCR method is revealed only after repeated rounds of DNA synthesis. Every cycle doubles the amount of DNA synthesized in the previous cycle. Because each cycle requires a brief heat treatment to separate the two strands of the template DNA double helix, the technique requires the use of a special DNA polymerase, isolated from a thermophilic bacterium, that is stable at much higher temperatures than normal, so that it is not denatured by the repeated heat treatments. With each round of DNA synthesis, the newly generated fragments serve as templates in their turn, and within a few cycles the predominant product is a single species of DNA fragment whose length corresponds to the distance between the two original primers (see ).
In practice, 2030 cycles of reaction are required for effective DNA amplification, with the products of each cycle serving as the DNA templates for the nexthence the term polymerase chain reaction. A single cycle requires only about 5 minutes, and the entire procedure can be easily automated. PCR thereby makes possible the cell-free molecular cloning of a DNA fragment in a few hours, compared with the several days required for standard cloning procedures. This technique is now used routinely to clone DNA from genes of interest directlystarting either from genomic DNA or from mRNA isolated from cells ().
Use of PCR to obtain a genomic or cDNA clone. (A) To obtain a genomic clone by using PCR, chromosomal DNA is first purified from cells. PCR primers that flank the stretch of DNA to be cloned are added, and many cycles of the reaction are completed (see (more...)
The PCR method is extremely sensitive; it can detect a single DNA molecule in a sample. Trace amounts of RNA can be analyzed in the same way by first transcribing them into DNA with reverse transcriptase. The PCR cloning technique has largely replaced Southern blotting for the diagnosis of genetic diseases and for the detection of low levels of viral infection. It also has great promise in forensic medicine as a means of analyzing minute traces of blood or other tissueseven as little as a single celland identifying the person from whom they came by his or her genetic fingerprint ().
How PCR is used in forensic science. (A) The DNA sequences that create the variability used in this analysis contain runs of short, repeated sequences, such as CACACA . . . , which are found in various positions (loci) in the human genome. The number (more...)
Fifteen years ago, the only proteins in a cell that could be studied easily were the relatively abundant ones. Starting with several hundred grams of cells, a major proteinone that constitutes 1% or more of the total cellular proteincan be purified by sequential chromatography steps to yield perhaps 0.1 g (100 mg) of pure protein. This amount was sufficient for conventional amino acid sequencing, for detailed analysis of biochemical activities, and for the production of antibodies, which could then be used to localize the protein in the cell. Moreover, if suitable crystals could be grown (often a difficult task), the three-dimensional structure of the protein could be determined by x-ray diffraction techniques, as we will discuss later. The structure and function of many abundant proteinsincluding hemoglobin, trypsin, immunoglobulin, and lysozymewere analyzed in this way.
The vast majority of the thousands of different proteins in a eucaryotic cell, however, including many with crucially important functions, are present in very small amounts. For most of them it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to obtain more than a few micrograms of pure material. One of the most important contributions of DNA cloning and genetic engineering to cell biology is that they have made it possible to produce any of the cell's proteins in nearly unlimited amounts.
Large amounts of a desired protein are produced in living cells by using expression vectors (). These are generally plasmids that have been designed to produce a large amount of a stable mRNA that can be efficiently translated into protein in the transfected bacterial, yeast, insect, or mammalian cell. To prevent the high level of the foreign protein from interfering with the transfected cell's growth, the expression vector is often designed so that the synthesis of the foreign mRNA and protein can be delayed until shortly before the cells are harvested ().
Production of large amounts of a protein from a protein-coding DNA sequence cloned into an expression vector and introduced into cells. A plasmid vector has been engineered to contain a highly active promoter, which causes unusually large amounts of mRNA (more...)
Production of large amounts of a protein by using a plasmid expression vector. In this example, bacterial cells have been transfected with the coding sequence for an enzyme, DNA helicase; transcription from this coding sequence is under the control of (more...)
Because the desired protein made from an expression vector is produced inside a cell, it must be purified away from the host cell proteins by chromatography following cell lysis; but because it is such a plentiful species in the cell lysate (often 110% of the total cell protein), the purification is usually easy to accomplish in only a few steps. Many expression vectors have been designed to add a molecular taga cluster of histidine residues or a small marker proteinto the expressed protein to make possible easy purification by affinity chromatography, as discussed previously (see pp. 483484). A variety of expression vectors are available, each engineered to function in the type of cell in which the protein is to be made. In this way cells can be induced to make vast quantities of medically useful proteinssuch as human insulin and growth hormone, interferon, and viral antigens for vaccines. More generally, these methods make it possible to produce every proteineven those that may be present in only a few copies per cellin large enough amounts to be used in the kinds of detailed structural and functional studies that we discuss in the next section ().
Knowledge of the molecular biology of cells makes it possible to experimentally move from gene to protein and from protein to gene. A small quantity of a purified protein is used to obtain a partial amino acid sequence. This provides sequence information (more...)
DNA technology can also be used to produce large amounts of any RNA molecule whose gene has been isolated. Studies of RNA splicing, protein synthesis, and RNA-based enzymes, for example, ar greatly facilitated by the availability of pure RNA molecules. Most RNAs are present in only tiny quantities in cells, and they are very difficult to purify away from other cellular componentsespecially from the many thousands of other RNAs present in the cell. But any RNA of interest can be synthesized efficiently in vitro by transcription of its DNA sequence with a highly efficient viral RNA polymerase. The single species of RNA produced is then easily purified away from the DNA template and the RNA polymerase.
DNA cloning allows a copy of any specific part of a DNA or RNA sequence to be selected from the millions of other sequences in a cell and produced in unlimited amounts in pure form. DNA sequences can be amplified after cutting chromosomal DNA with a restriction nuclease and inserting the resulting DNA fragments into the chromosome of a self-replicating genetic element. Plasmid vectors are generally used and the resulting genomic DNA library is housed in millions of bacterial cells, each carrying a different cloned DNA fragment. Individual cells that are allowed to proliferate produce large amounts of a single cloned DNA fragment from this library. As an alternative, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allows DNA cloning to be performed directly with a purified, thermostable DNA polymeraseproviding that the DNA sequence of interest is already known.
The procedures used to obtain DNA clones that correspond in sequence to mRNA molecules are the same except that a DNA copy of the mRNA sequence, called cDNA, is first made. Unlike genomic DNA clones, cDNA clones lack intron sequences, making them the clones of choice for analyzing the protein product of a gene.
Nucleic acid hybridization reactions provide a sensitive means of detecting a gene or any other nucleotide sequence of choice. Under stringent hybridization conditions (a combination of solvent and temperature where a perfect double helix is barely stable), two strands can pair to form a hybrid helix only if their nucleotide sequences are almost perfectly complementary. The enormous specificity of this hybridization reaction allows any single-stranded sequence of nucleotides to be labeled with a radioisotope or chemical and used as a probe to find a complementary partner strand, even in a cell or cell extract that contains millions of different DNA and RNA sequences. Probes of this type are widely used to detect the nucleic acids corresponding to specific genes, both to facilitate their purification and characterization and to localize them in cells, tissues, and organisms.
The nucleotide sequence of purified DNA fragments can be determined rapidly and simply by using highly automated techniques based on the dideoxy method for sequencing DNA. This technique has made it possible to determine the complete DNA sequences of tens of thousands of genes and to completely sequence the genomes of many organisms. Comparison of the genome sequences of different organisms allows us to trace the evolutionary relationships among genes and organisms, and it has proved valuable for discovering new genes and predicting their function.
Taken together, these techniques have made it possible to identify, isolate, and sequence genes from any organism of interest. Related technologies allow scientists to produce the protein products of these genes in the large quantities needed for detailed analyses of their structure and function, as well as for medical purposes.
Follow this link:
Isolating, Cloning, and Sequencing DNA - Molecular Biology of the Cell ...
Posted in Cloning
Comments Off on Isolating, Cloning, and Sequencing DNA – Molecular Biology of the Cell …
Independence Contract Drilling, Inc. Reports Unaudited Financial …
Posted: at 5:04 am
HOUSTON, Nov. 1, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Independence Contract Drilling, Inc. (the "Company" or "ICD") (NYSE: ICD) today reported financial results for the three months ended September30,2022.
Third quarter 2022 Highlights
In the third quarter of 2022, the Company reported revenues of $49.1 million, a net loss of $7.2 million, or $0.53 per share, adjusted net loss (defined below) of $4.8 million, or $0.35 per share, and adjusted EBITDA (defined below) of $12.5 million. These results compare to revenues of $24.0 million, a net loss of $4.3 million, or $0.59 per share, adjusted net loss of $13.7 million, or $1.87 per share, and adjusted EBITDA loss of $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2021, and revenues of $42.3 million, a net loss of $2.8 million, or $0.21 per share, an adjusted net loss of $9.8 million, or $0.72 per share, and adjusted EBITDA of $9.2 million in the second quarter of 2022.
Chief Executive Officer Anthony Gallegos commented, "ICD achieved significant progress towards its rig reactivation, rig margin and adjusted EBITDA goals during the third quarter of 2022. The Company achieved quarterly revenue per day and margin per day records during the quarter, buoyed by continued penetration of our 300 series rigs and our marketing strategy of patiently waiting to seek longer-term contracts. All of this drove sequential improvements in quarterly adjusted EBITDA of 35%.
Against a backdrop of greater general macroeconomic uncertainty, market conditions for the Company's services have continued to tighten as overall supply and demand fundamentals driven by historically low underinvestment over the past decade have outweighed general economic headwinds. During the quarter, we began to strategically sign longer-term contracts and have increased our quarter-end backlog by 87% compared to the second quarter. More importantly, our backlog extending into 2023 is priced at levels that we expect will generate revenue per day over 20% higher than our reported third quarter revenue per day levels and margin per day over 55% higher than third quarter levels. In addition, we still have the majority of our fleet on shorter-term contracts that will reprice during the fourth quarter of 2022 or the first quarter of 2023.
With this backdrop, we expect to see further sequential improvements in revenues and margin per day during the remainder of this year and into 2023. Our current expectations are that fourth quarter margin per day will exceed reported third quarter levels between 10% and 15%, and first quarter 2023 margin per day will exceed reported third quarter levels between 28% and 32%. Given pricing already imbedded in our 2023 backlog, we are excited about further opportunities for margin expansion beyond these periods.
Operationally, our rig reactivations remain on schedule and our 200-to-300-series conversion program has commenced with our first conversion in process. Our 19th rig mobilized for operations at the end of October and our 20th rig is scheduled for mobilization at the end of the fourth quarter. Both of these reactivations are pursuant to one-year contracts at leading edge dayrates where expected margins will earn back reactivation costs well within the contract terms. Looking forward into 2023, we are marketing our 21st rig for mobilization early-to-mid first quarter of 2023 and our 22nd rig for the end of the first quarter or early second quarter of 2023."
Quarterly Operational Results
In the third quarter of 2022, operating days increased sequentially by 4% compared to the second quarter of 2022. The Company's marketed fleet operated at 70% utilization and recorded 1,601 revenue days, compared to 1,268 revenue days in the third quarter of 2021, and 1,540 revenue days in the second quarter of 2022.
Operating revenues in the third quarter of 2022 totaled $49.1 million, compared to $24.0 million in the third quarter of 2021 and $42.3 million in the second quarter of 2022. Revenue per day in the third quarter of 2022 was $28,646, compared to $17,141 in the third quarter of 2021 and $24,875 in the second quarter of 2022. The sequential increase quarter over quarter in revenue per day was driven by higher dayrates on contract renewals and reactivated rigs.
Operating costs in the third quarter of 2022 totaled $31.4 million, compared to $20.1 million in the third quarter of 2021 and $28.9 million in second quarter of 2022. Fully burdened operating costs were $17,305 per day in the third quarter of 2022, compared to $13,685 in the third quarter of 2021 and $15,929 in the second quarter of 2022. Sequential increases in operating costs per day were driven primarily by higher labor costs associated with increases in field-level wages implemented during the latter part of the second quarter of 2022, partially offset by improved cost absorption.
Fully burdened rig operating margins in the third quarter of 2022 were $11,341 per day, compared to $3,456 per day in the third quarter of 2021 and $8,946 per day in the second quarter of 2022. The Company currently expects per day operating margins in the fourth quarter of 2022 to increase sequentially between 10% and 15% compared to the third quarter of 2022, driven primarily by favorable dayrate momentum as well as the reactivation of the Company's 19th and 20th rigs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the third quarter of 2022 were $7.0 million (including $1.7 million of non-cash compensation), compared to $4.1 million (including $0.8 million of non-cash compensation) in the third quarter of 2021 and $4.9 million (including $0.7 million of non-cash compensation) in the second quarter of 2022. Cash selling, general and administrative expenses increased sequentially during the quarter due to $0.3 million relating to a dispute settlement and higher incentive compensation accruals. Stock-based incentive compensation expense increased sequentially primarily due to full quarter amortization of out-of-the-money stock appreciation rights granted late in the second quarter of 2022.
During the quarter, the Company recorded interest expense of $8.1 million, including $2.0 million, or $0.14 per share, relating to non-cash amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs. The Company has excluded this non-cash amortization when presenting adjusted net income/loss per share.
The Company recorded a tax benefit of $0.7 million, or $0.05 per share, during the third quarter of 2022, of which $0.1 million relates to cash taxes, attributable to state and local franchise taxes.
Drilling Operations Update
The Company exited the third quarter with 18 rigs operating. Overall, the Company's operating rig count averaged 17.4 rigs during the quarter. The Company's backlog of drilling contracts with original terms of six months or longer is $101.6 million. This backlog excludes rigs operating on short term pad-to-pad drilling contracts. Approximately 31% of this backlog is expected to be realized in 2022. The Company's 19th rig mobilized for drilling operations on a one-year contract in the Haynesville at the end of October 2022 and the Company's 20th rig is contracted and scheduled for reactivation late in the fourth quarter of 2022.
Capital Expenditures and Liquidity Update
Cash outlays for capital expenditures in the third quarter of 2022, net of asset sales and recoveries, were $9.4 million. This included $5.6 million associated with prior period deliveries.
As of September30,2022, the Company had cash on hand of $7.6 million and a revolving line of credit with availability of $19.9 million. The Company elected to pay in-kind interest due under its convertible notes as of September 30, 2022. Following this payment, $170.2 million principal amount was outstanding under the convertible notes.
Conference Call Details
A conference call for investors will be held today, November 1, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Central Time (12:00 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the Company's third quarter 2022 results.
The call can be accessed live over the telephone by dialing (855) 239-3115 or for international callers, (412) 542-4125. A replay will be available shortly after the call and can be accessed by dialing (877) 344-7529 or for international callers, (412) 317-0088. The passcode for the replay is 2879534. The replay will be available until November 8, 2022.
Interested parties may also listen to a simultaneous webcast of the conference call by logging onto the Company's website at http://www.icdrilling.com in the Investor Relations section. A replay of the webcast will also be available for approximately 30 days following the call.
About Independence Contract Drilling, Inc.
Independence Contract Drilling provides land-based contract drilling services for oil and natural gas producers in the United States. The Company constructs, owns and operates a fleet of pad-optimal ShaleDriller rigs that are specifically engineered and designed to accelerate its clients' production profiles and cash flows from their most technically demanding and economically impactful oil and gas properties. For more information, visit http://www.icdrilling.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Words such as "anticipated," "estimated," "expected," "planned," "scheduled," "targeted," "believes," "intends," "objectives," "projects," "strategies" and similar expressions are used to identify such forward-looking statements. However, the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements relating to Independence Contract Drilling's operations are based on a number of expectations or assumptions which have been used to develop such information and statements but which may prove to be incorrect. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict, and there can be no assurance that actual outcomes and results will not differ materially from those expected by management of Independence Contract Drilling. For more information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those conveyed in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the "Risk Factors" section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC and the information included in subsequent amendments and other filings. These forward-looking statements are based on and include the Company's expectations as of the date hereof. Independence Contract Drilling does not undertake any obligation to update or revise such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur, or which Independence Contract Drilling becomes aware of, after the date hereof.
INDEPENDENCE CONTRACT DRILLING, INC.
Unaudited
(in thousands, except par value and share data)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September30,2022
December31,2021
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
7,566
$
4,140
Accounts receivable
33,967
22,211
Inventories
1,433
1,171
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
2,940
4,787
Total current assets
45,906
32,309
Property, plant and equipment, net
365,160
362,346
Other long-term assets, net
2,159
2,449
Total assets
$
413,225
$
397,104
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt (1)
$
3,302
$
4,464
Accounts payable
28,859
15,304
Accrued liabilities
13,162
11,245
Accrued interest
122
4,372
Current portion of merger consideration payable to an affiliate
2,902
Total current liabilities
45,445
38,287
Long-term debt (2)
136,756
141,740
Deferred income taxes, net
19,391
19,037
Other long-term liabilities
1,661
2,811
Total liabilities
203,253
201,875
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 13,698,851 and 10,287,931shares issued, respectively, and 13,617,005 and 10,206,085 shares outstanding, respectively
See the original post here:
Independence Contract Drilling, Inc. Reports Unaudited Financial ...
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on Independence Contract Drilling, Inc. Reports Unaudited Financial …
How Much Money You Need to Retire Early in All 50 States – NextAdvisor
Posted: at 5:04 am
- How Much Money You Need to Retire Early in All 50 States NextAdvisor
- Is the concept of financial independence and early retirement truly feasible? Benefits Canada
- The Hidden Costs of Early Retirement -- And Why You Might Want to Avoid This Trend CNET
- How Soon Can I Afford to Retire? Yahoo Finance
- #414: Ask Paula: I Think I Can Retire Early. Am I Delusional?! Afford Anything
- View Full Coverage on Google News
View post:
How Much Money You Need to Retire Early in All 50 States - NextAdvisor
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on How Much Money You Need to Retire Early in All 50 States – NextAdvisor
3 steps forward, but 2.5 back for populism – bangkokpost.com
Posted: at 5:03 am
The reports about Luiz Incio 'Lula' da Silva's impending comeback as Brazilian president verged on the ecstatic in the week before the vote on Oct 2. He was after all, fourteen points ahead of his populist rival, incumbent president Jair Bolsonaro, in the last opinion poll before the vote.
"Lula on track for stunning political comeback," said one paper. "Ol, ol, ol! Lula voters sing for a heroic comeback to banish Bolsonaro," said another. Speculation was rife that Mr Lula would win more than 50% in the first round of voting, avoiding the need for a runoff vote between the two leading candidates on Oct 30.
But the polls were wrong. Mr Lula got a respectable 48% of the vote, but he was only five points ahead of Mr Bolsonaro at 43%, and in Brazilian politics the candidates in the lead often fall behind in the second round. The long anticipated global decline and fall of the hard-right populist movement has been at least postponed.
This is particularly relevant to the United States, where Donald Trump constantly praises Bolsonaro as "Tropical Trump". Mr Lula is to the left of Joe Biden, but both men are ageing stalwarts of the centre-left who have made political comebacks but already feel a little bit like yesterday's news.
What has already happened in this first-round presidential election in Brazil is a triumph of the hard right in the simultaneous Congressional elections that would make another Lula presidency very difficult. Joe Biden may face similar difficulties after next month's US mid-term Congressional elections, if polling predictions are right.
Both men have essentially promised a return to the sensible, moderate centre-left politics of yore, and that doesn't seem to be setting hearts aflame in either country. To be fair, however, Mr Lula bears an additional handicap: a criminal conviction.
I spent a whole day with Lula long ago in So Paulo's car-making suburb of So Bernardo do Campo, when he was genuinely a horny-handed son of toil and a trade union organiser. He certainly seemed to be an honest man then, even a poor man, but he was freed from jail only last year after serving part of a twelve-year sentence for corruption in office.
It wasn't a lot of money and the charges may have been trumped up: the judge who brought them and sent Lula to jail, Sergio Moro, was later given a post in Mr Bolsonaro's government as justice minister.
There is no clear evidence that the populist wave is subsiding. Mr Bolsonaro could get a second term, Mr Trump could come back in the United States, Mr Modi is not losing his grip in India. Mr Orbn won a landslide re-election victory in Hungary last month, a hard-right coalition won last month's election in Italy, Boris Johnson might even make a comeback in the UK.
The driving force in this populist wave is a thinly disguised alliance between a very rich elite and the resentful, downwardly mobile parts of the old middle and working classes. The emotional cement that holds it together involves a strong dose of extreme religion, deep social conservatism (eg, homophobia), ultra-nationalism, and anti-immigrant sentiment.
Not every element is present in every country. Religion is not a big part of populism in England; immigration is not a major issue in Brazil or India. But fear and scapegoating of minorities is almost universal, and an abundance of lies and endless "culture war" distractions serve to paper over the cracks in this cynical alliance of opposites.
Populism will be with us for some time yet, and it may even spread a bit. Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoan may cover the rest of the distance to full populism as the country's economic problems worsen, and France might have gone full populist last year.
The other side is parties of the democratic left that are winning power in almost all the rest of Latin America -- Alberto Fernndez in Argentina (2019), Luis Arce in Bolivia (2020), Pedro Castillo in Peru and Gabriel Boric in Chile (2021), Xiomara Castro in Honduras (2022), and most recently Gustavo Petro in Columbia.
It's also noteworthy that only three of the European Union's 27 members currently have populist governments: Italy, Poland and Hungary. Moreover, the new Italian coalition may not last long, and Poland's populism is for domestic affairs only: Polish populists are not admirers of Vladimir Putin.
In Asia and Africa, the populist formula has not been deployed in politics at all except in India. As a recently refurbished political technique it is having some successes, but every new political technique loses its freshness after a while.
And neither Mr Lula nor Mr Biden has lost their next elections yet.
Gwynne Dyer
Independent journalist
Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries. His new book is 'Growing Pains: The Future of Democracy (and Work)'.
See the rest here:
3 steps forward, but 2.5 back for populism - bangkokpost.com
Posted in Populism
Comments Off on 3 steps forward, but 2.5 back for populism – bangkokpost.com
Watch Casino | Prime Video – amazon.com
Posted: at 5:01 am
It's very difficult to decide a 'favorite' Scorsese movie. You could look at Goodfellas or Raging Bull and say they were perfect films. In that it's hard to imagine it possible they could have been executed better, or made more entertaining. Casino, is not as acclaimed as those films, but in my view is every bit deserving as being one of the best films of the decade.
I would argue that De Niro and Pesci's performances in Casino are every bit as good, as in Casino as in Goodfellas (of course, they are playing similar characters) - but De Niro's Ace Rothstein is not a criminal at heart - like De Niro in Goodfellas, or Pesci in both films. He's a complex character, played just brilliantly by DeNiro. Very much a regular guy, with a special gift for numbers and gambling. His reward, 'paradise on earth'. He's rich, protected by the mob, and has his pick of any showgirl in Vegas - and throws it all away.
While Ace Rothstein is a regular guy (somewhat) posing as a gangster, Pesci's Nicky Santoro is a gangster posing as a regular guy. Pesci is full-on gangster Pesci, and not much needs to be said here. Completely convincing as a sociopath. I find the little things stand out and I particularly enjoyed Pesci's Chicago accent in this character.
You also can't say enough good things about Sharon Stone's Oscar quality (was nominated, won Golden Globe in 1995) performance. Charming, Sexy, Glamourous, Broken, and completely dangerous to any man, who tells Rothstein quite plainly 'you've got the wrong girl'.
This is a well liked film among many, and at the same time, one of the most underrated films of the decade of the 1990s. It's that good.
Continue reading here:
Posted in Casino
Comments Off on Watch Casino | Prime Video – amazon.com
Casinos in USA with Map Map showing Casinos in USA by State
Posted: at 5:01 am
Nevada
Nevadawas one of the first states to legalize gambling back in the time of the Great Depression. Because of this, Las Vegas grew to be this huge gambling empire thats still considered one of the best places for casino entertainment in the world.
With over 200 casinos to choose from and plenty of luxury hotel resorts where you can spend the night, Las Vegas is an ideal place for your next holiday. The best casinos in the city are located on the Strip, a four-mile-long avenue where you can find famous casino landmarks such asBellagio, Caesars Palace,Flamingo, Tropicana, MGM, Luxorand others. Apart from casinos, you can also go to one of many music concerts, sporting events, art galleries, circus performances, and other shows that are held throughout the year.
Although Las Vegas is the first city that pops to mind when you think about the state of Nevada, there are actually a few other places that a casual gambler might find interesting. Reno, which is located in the north-western part of the state and close to the California border, is like a smaller version of Vegas, but with its own special charm.
In the part of town called Sparks, you can find great casinos likeJohn Ascuagas Nugget, Silver Club, Dottys and Mint Casino. In downtown Reno, some of the more famous gambling places includeHarrahs, Circus Circus, Silver Legacyand others.
Apart from Vegas and Reno, you can find several modern casino houses in towns of Carson City, Fallon, Silver Springs, Wells, Elko, Battle Mountain, Ely, and other places.
Read the rest here:
Posted in Casino
Comments Off on Casinos in USA with Map Map showing Casinos in USA by State