Daily Archives: October 8, 2022

A Message to the Self-Proclaimed Social Liberal, Fiscal Conservative – The Miami Hurricane

Posted: October 8, 2022 at 3:45 pm

A common political archetype for students at UM is the self-proclaimed socially left, economically right individual. Many students believe in socially progressive values, such as access to abortion, gun control and LGBTQ+ representation, but dont voice the same support for the economic policies that would bring those ideas to fruition. Economic and social values are inextricably intertwined, and the disparity in ideals only serves to impede social progress.

Progressivism seems to line up fairly consistently, UM political science professor Casey Klofstad said. Social progressives would probably be in favor of raising taxes to fund social programs.

This is a reasonable extension of socially left policies, but oftentimes those who come from affluent backgrounds, as is the case with many UM students, are more sympathetic towards wealth protection. They are often opposed to high tax margins, free healthcare and other economically progressive ideas regardless of whether they consider themselves as fully conservative. For the good of society, it is very important for such students to abandon these notions.

Simultaneously embracing social liberalism and fiscal conservatism means relegating social policies to mere ideals. The fact of the matter is that tackling social justice issues like systemic racism is nearly impossible without an economic backbone.

For example, the United States still experiences effects from redlining, a 1930s process in which the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) created maps that ranked communities from best (green) to worst (red) based on investment risk. Communities with a high population of Black Americans were marked in red on the map and deemed hazardous, making it virtually impossible for people living in those communities to obtain loans. Though the practice was banned in 1968, previously redlined neighborhoods still suffer the effects from years of financial neglect with lower levels of homeownership and lower median household incomes.

The problem is, when faced with a discrepancy between ones beliefs and their actions, individuals will almost always change their beliefs rather than their actions. Simply put: people will do anything to avoid the perilous fate of being proven wrong. Thus the ever-compromising, socially liberal yet fiscally conservative hybrid is born.

Many people who claim they really value social issues like racial equality may simultaneously be against the economic aspect of police reform or defunding. When provided with evidence on how the police are implicitly biased against certain racial groups, they may often downplay their stance on racial equality rather than police reform. This cognitive dissonance they experience further stifles the conversation around social progress and generates zero solutions.

Most folks are not pure ideologuesmost folks have disparate opinions that can go in logically inconsistent directions, Klofstad said.

A persons belief system naturally tends to be complex and hypocritical. However, now is the time for the socially liberal and economically conservative student to iron out those complexities. Its imperative to understand that for any real change to occur, social issues cant be separated from the very funds that would enable them to work effectively. For lasting and beneficial social change, we must invest in it financially.

Jayden Cohen is a freshman majoring in Business Analytics in the Miami Herbert Business School.

See more here:

A Message to the Self-Proclaimed Social Liberal, Fiscal Conservative - The Miami Hurricane

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on A Message to the Self-Proclaimed Social Liberal, Fiscal Conservative – The Miami Hurricane

2nd Annual Faith and Blue Coming to Liberal on Sunday – KSCB News.net

Posted: at 3:45 pm

The Seward County Sheriffs Office will be participating with the National Faith and Blue, and will be hosting their 2nd Faith and Blue event this Sunday October 9th. The Seward County Sheriffs Office, the Liberal Police Department and other area First Responders will participate in a Dodgeball Tournament. The event will begin by serving food and drinks to the community at 4:00pm, in the amphitheater at SCCC as well as a meet and greet with all the teams before the game starts. There will also be bounce houses and face painting on site as well. During the games in the Greenhouse, there will be a ton of door prizes given away to children and adults which all have been donated through our local businesses.

To receive a prize ticket, bring a nonperishable food item to be collected during the meet and greet (one ticket per person). All donated goods will be distributed throughout the food banks in our area.

The goal of this event is to bring law enforcement closer to the community by bridging the gap through our law enforcement agencies, 1st Responders, local schools, businesses, and churches.

View original post here:

2nd Annual Faith and Blue Coming to Liberal on Sunday - KSCB News.net

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on 2nd Annual Faith and Blue Coming to Liberal on Sunday – KSCB News.net

Chaiken Scholar finds community in the Latino Caucus and Liberal Arts – psu.edu

Posted: at 3:45 pm

Because Latino Caucus was that support system he craved, he knew that stepping into the role of president meant that he also needed to ensure that support system carried on into the future. He wanted students to feel as welcomed and embraced as he did, no matter their situation, while providing opportunities for them to grow as students and individuals.

During my term as president, I want these students to be able to prepare themselves professionally, academically, in any capacity to its fullest while also creating a unified space for Latinx marginalized communities here at Penn State as well as preparing them with the best possible resources and making sure they are set to pursue any goals they might have, he said.

It has not only been organizations like Latino Caucus that have allowed Garza to pursue his passions that pertain to his academic career. He credits his ability to explore these passions to Student Services staff in the College of the Liberal Arts who have awarded him many opportunities to grow as a student leader.

The College of the Liberal Arts has financially helped me beyond my own comprehension, Garza said. I did not think I would be able to come across the country to pursue a college education. It blows my mind every day to know that there are people here who want to see me succeed and be equipped with everything I might need.

After being accepted to Penn State, Garza was selected as a Chaiken Scholar in the College of the Liberal Arts, a program established by longtime benefactors Gene and Roz Chaiken in 2008.

Being a Chaiken Scholar has welcomed me to an environment that equips me with resources that I never knew existed, nor knew I would have because I am a low-income and first-generation college student, Garza said. My family would never be able to afford my undergraduate academic career, but with this financial assistance, I am able to get a world-class education. Being a part of the Chaiken community is a huge help because I have people in my corner who want to see me succeed, and that feels amazing.

The Chaikens made a gift in 2020 to establish the Roz and Gene Chaiken Center for Student Success in the College of the Liberal Arts, which opened the following year. Garza credits Patty Klug, director of the Chaiken Center for Student Success, for him becoming the student he is today and emphasizes that he would not be where he is today if not for her.

I pop into her office at least once a week, if not two times a week, he said. Shes just so helpful, and I like making sure that I say Hi to her or making small gestures like that to return the favor of everything she has done for me. I want to make sure that I am showing my appreciativeness towards her.

Garza has also received support from Earl F. Merritt, director of the Office of Equity, Inclusion, and Diversity in the College of the Liberal Arts. When Garza was accepted to Penn State, he received the Bunton-Waller Scholarship from Merritts office. This scholarship program was named in honor of Mildred Settle Bunton, recognized as the first African American woman to graduate from Penn State, and Calvin Hoffman Waller, believed to be Penn States first African American graduate.

When I saw my financial aid package, and the scholarship was on there, I legit wanted to cry, Garza said. The scholarship helped me get an education that I never thought I would be able to accomplish or achieve.

These two scholarships gave Garza the privilege of not worrying heavily about financial means and focusing solely on his academic and professional career. He also met other Bunton-Waller Fellows, which built yet another support system for him to lean on. This has been especially important to him since he is juggling a lot of responsibilities while also trying to enjoy everything college has to offer.

I would not be here had it not been for Mr. Merritt. He has helped me from a financial standpoint and has alleviated the burden of finances for me and my family, Garza said. I also meet with him at least once a semester to discuss where Im at in my academic path and go to him if I have any concerns or need any advice.

Both Patty Klug and Mr. Merritt are the best people I have in my corner rooting for me here at Penn State.

Garzas Penn State experience thus far is one that he will be forever grateful for and one that he hopes to continue to take full advantage of. Coming from the mentality of not knowing if he would ever be able to achieve such goals has pushed his involvement and desire to make an impact on the Penn State community.

Dont let anyone tell you that the goal you make for yourself, or the goals that you strive for, are unattainable and unreachable because theyre more than reachable, Garza said. You are more than able to do what you want to do.

Excerpt from:

Chaiken Scholar finds community in the Latino Caucus and Liberal Arts - psu.edu

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Chaiken Scholar finds community in the Latino Caucus and Liberal Arts – psu.edu

Cheney on having liberal Democrats as supporters: Im not choosy these days – The Hill

Posted: at 3:45 pm

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) on Monday discussed her newfound support from liberal Democrats as she continues her crusade against former President Trump, saying she is not choosy these days about who is in her corner.

During an event at Syracuse University, Provost Gretchen Ritter askedCheney, As a lifelong Republican, how painful is it to have liberal Democrats in your fan club now?

Im not choosy these days, the Wyoming Republican responded, laughing herself and eliciting chuckles from the crowd.

Cheney has gotten praise from across the aisle in recent months, specifically after she criticized Trumps claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen and voted to impeach him following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

That stance got her ousted from her post as House GOP conference chairwoman in May 2021.

The three-term congresswoman has since dug in her criticism of Trump, particularly through her role as the vice chairwoman of the House select committee investigating the Capitol riot. She frequently uses the elevated platform to scrutinize the former president.

But the role as top GOP Trump critic also led her to be defeated in a reelection primary this summer against Trump-back candidate Harriet Hageman.

Before primary day, Cheney had been urging Democrats to switch their party affiliation and vote for her so she would prevail over Hageman. Her campaign website outlined instructions for how residents could change their party affiliation and participate in the GOP primary, and The New York Times reported that her campaign was sending mailers to Democrats in the state with information on voting in the GOP primary.

Two House Democrats Reps. Dean Phillips (Minn.) and Tom Malinowski (N.J.) cut ads for Cheney, urging members of their party to switch affiliations and vote for her.

While the strategy did not work to change the election results, the Times reported that voters at polling places in the Cowboy State were changing their affiliation.

Members of the Jan. 6 select committee have also praised Cheney.

On Election Day in August, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Twitter called Cheney a constitutional patriot and able servant of Wyoming.

Cheney on Monday, after remarking on Democrats showing her support, said members of the party on Capitol Hill gave us in the House everything we wanted, noting that Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) pulled GOP lawmakers from the panel.

Originally posted here:

Cheney on having liberal Democrats as supporters: Im not choosy these days - The Hill

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Cheney on having liberal Democrats as supporters: Im not choosy these days – The Hill

Liberal campaign beset by threats to quit, surprise announcements and lack of cash – The Age

Posted: at 3:45 pm

That fact meant TV ads, social media graphics and other material to spruik the plan which were intended to be released on the same day as the policy were not ready to go. The party subsequently faced criticism because the initial story claimed the party would save more money from the policy than it could.

This week, Guys office again surprised campaign leaders when it decided to announce a policy to put armed Protective Services Officers in hospitals. It came days after the Coalition detailed a debt ceiling, which the campaign team intended to be the first in a week full of economic policies. Those policies have not yet eventuated. The hospital security plan was quickly rubbished by Labor as a rehash of an old, failed proposal.

Illustrating members dissatisfaction with the campaign, senior party members this week expressed surprise in a private Facebook group over the suggestion HQ was not teaching candidates how to add election authorisations to social media posts.

Last week, the party lost its deputy state director, who did not have a campaigning role, and about half of the junior campaigners responsible for individual seat operations.

The campaign director and their staff, who are funded by the party not the taxpayer, are supposed to be in charge of election policy and planning. This week, Guys taxpayer-funded staff and campaign workers moved into the same building to begin operating as a joint unit.

Loading

The enmeshing means leaders from HQ are likely to be vested with greater responsibility to oversee the entire machine. McGowan will leave the campaign next month to start campaigning as an upper house candidate (he is likely to be replaced as Guys chief of staff by his deputy). Meanwhile, experienced campaigners from NSW and former federal ministers offices have been hired, as has former state director and Josh Frydenberg staffer Simon Frost, who is supporting the campaign but is not directly involved.

While some Liberals fear the polls point to a bad election loss, other signs point to a coherent campaign. Labor officials have been impressed by the consistency of the Coalitions messaging on health and the strategic locations of hospital upgrades in key seats.

One party campaigner in Melbournes inner-east said MPs across the city were struggling to find volunteers, and party members were unclear about what the key election policies were other than scrapping the rail loop. In particular, senior Liberals are worried the party has not spent long enough boosting its narrative on the economy, reining in debt and alleviating cost-of-living issues.

On a recent Zoom hook-up, officials agreed to adjust the partys use of social media platforms such as TikTok, which has been criticised by some social media users last month.

Five Liberal MPs told The Age they were frustrated with planning spokesman Ryan Smith, who they believed was spending the weeks before the campaign laying the groundwork for a tilt as the leadership after the election rather than contributing to policy in his portfolio.

Ryan Smith in 2018.Credit:Eddie Jim

Smith has been meeting with a group of new candidates who may enter parliament and vote in a potential leadership ballot. At least one MP has been told he had discussed his leadership ambitions with a new candidate.

Responding to these claims, Smith said: In 2014 and 2018 I did all I could to assist candidates so we could win seats and form government. This election is no different. Im focussed on winning government, thats it.

Pollster and former Labor campaigner Kos Samaras whose RedBridge Group performed work for teal independents before the federal election said the Coalitions level of support was weak across Victoria and indicated the party would not pick up seats Labor won in 2014 which are required to get back into government.

In all the electorates said we have polled now and it exceeds 40 all but one has the Liberal Party primary vote below 40 per cent, he said. Matthew Guys seat of Bulleen had a Liberal primary of 41 per cent, more than 10 points down on his last election result.

Kos Samaras believes the Coalitions level of support is weak across Victoria.Credit:Wayne Taylor

He said the Liberal Party primary vote had shown signs of recovering but the signs of 2010 - when a late Coalition surge defeated the Brumby government - were not present.

The Cormack Foundation an investment fund uninhibited by donation caps that was established to finance Coalition campaigns has given the party a fraction of the amount it wants, leaving the campaign with far less cash than it had for the 2018 poll.

The campaign is seeking between $4 and $5 million but have so far received less than $2 million. Senior Liberals are hopeful more money will be transferred to pay for things such as crucial TV and digital ads, but the current level of funding means the Coalition will begin the campaign well behind Labor, which has an approximately $3 million head start on public funding alone.

The Morning Edition newsletter is our guide to the days most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up here.

Follow this link:

Liberal campaign beset by threats to quit, surprise announcements and lack of cash - The Age

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Liberal campaign beset by threats to quit, surprise announcements and lack of cash – The Age

Joe Oliver: In Spite of Overarching Challenges, the Liberals Remain Unduly Fixated on a ‘Climate Emergency’ – The Epoch Times

Posted: at 3:45 pm

Commentary

Canada is not immune to the dire challenges of a world gripped by the first European war since World War II, with nuclear threats from an irredentist Russia, a destabilizing energy crisis, a looming global recession brought on by central bankers aggressively raising interest rates to combat galloping inflation which they had previously underestimated, unprecedented public debt, and a lingering global pandemic.

The stock markets wild volatility reflects these forces, with a chilling US$9 trillion drop in global stock valuations in the third quarter and uncertainty whether the most recent upswing is sustainable or a bear trap.

In spite of overarching challenges, Prime Minister Trudeau and his ministers remain obsessed with a climate emergency, a fixation that is unjustifiable for at least four reasons.

First, Canada represents only 1.5 percent of global emissions and the oilsands are a minuscule 0.1 percent, so the government is powerless to impact warming here or anywhere else. Second, global GHG emissions are up over 60 percent in the past 20 years because other countries, especially those with the most rapidly growing emissions, are doing precious little to decrease them, notwithstanding all their impassioned rhetoric. Third, the attempt to achieve net zero by 2050 would cost Canadians a crushing $2 trillion, according to RBC Economics. Fourth, Canada is blessed with some of the most abundant proven oil and gas resources in the world, yet Liberal policies block their huge potential for employment, economic growth, and public funding for critical social programs like health care.

What will Trudeau say to Canadians when a recession likely hits them next year, which could have been precluded or at least mitigated by the development and sale of oil and natural gas? Like a man falling from a skyscraper reassuring himselfSo far so goodhe will soon hit the pavement. Most countries couldnt care less about a wealthy countrys self-harm, regardless of its high-minded motivation. However, there are two exceptions: European allies who urgently need energy resources, and fossil fuel exporters like Russia and other autocracies that benefit from reduced competition.

While our PM boasts about the nobility of his intentions and the moral superiority of his wokeness, Canada has become a vainglorious model of wasted potential and uselessness.

By imposing punishing taxes including a carbon tax, rigid production caps, and other draconian regulations like the Clean Fuel Standard, the government effectively precluded over $150 billion in gas and oil projects and strong-armed provinces to move to intermittent renewables that require backup from natural gas, which it also discourages. Eventually net zero can be achieved, but not at the targeted pace. Furthermore, the cost will be very onerous, especially for the least economically advantaged here and in the poorest countries. However, true believers do not question whether the headlong rush is justifiable or even achievable and whether there are better alternatives, including adaptation and more emphasis on scientific research.

Meanwhile, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts is predicting a colder winter with less wind and rain than usual, thereby reducing the generation of renewable power. Energy prices in Europe rose over 40 percent in September, driving inflation to 10 percent. The Brits and Dutch are returning to high-emitting coal and wood pellets to heat their homes. In Germany, nuclear plants may operate longer and the coal phaseout may be delayed. Twenty-seven EU energy ministers are backing emergency measures to cut power use and tax windfall profits of energy companies to reduce the burden on individuals and businesses.

U.K. Prime Minister Liz Truss advised King Charles to stay away from the upcoming COP27 climate summit in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, since she does not want the new monarch to mouth off about a far-off climate emergency. Her government is focused on citizens who are confronting a heat-or-eat dilemma, prompting her to lift a moratorium on shale gas extraction that could eclipse North Sea production in 15 years. Furthermore, Truss appointed appointed Jacob Rees-Mogg, a well-known climate skeptic, as business secretary, and Suella Braverman, her powerful home secretary, questioned the wisdom of the net-zero goal.

President Biden keeps spouting environmental fealty, even as he opened 62 million acres of federal onshore and offshore lands to fracking. The Republicans seem poised to win a majority in the House of Representatives in the midterms and possibly the White House in 2024, which would change the direction of American climate policy.

Between 2015 and 2021, the United States reduced its emissions by 6 percent, mainly by moving from coal to natural gas. However, wealthy countries represent less than one-third of global emissions, so Americas improvements will be swamped by increases in India, Africa, and especially China that, during the same period, increased emissions by 11 percent. Furthermore, China is planning or building coal-fired power plants with a total capacity of at least 100 gigawatts, enough to power 77 million homes. Xi Jinping was clear: We cant be detached from reality. We cant toss away whats feeding us now while what will feed us next is still not in our pocket.

There was never a basis for the oft-repeated claim that 97 percent of scientists agree about a climate emergency. Now the much-vaunted scientific consensus is increasingly questioned. As just one example, over 1,400 scientists and professionals from 55 countries signed the World Climate Declaration asserting there is no climate emergency; warming has both natural and anthropogenic causes, it is far slower than predicted and has not increased natural disasters; CO2 is not a pollutant but rather the basis of all life; and climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities.

A dispassionate public discussion, without acrimony, insults, and threats, is long overdue about a public policy issue that some consider to be existential. So far that has proven to be impossible because of people like United Nations spokesperson Melissa Fleming, who proclaimed at a World Economic Forum meeting that We own the science.

On one side of this debate of the deaf are passionate believers in the imminent irreversibility of an apocalyptic climate emergency. The groupthink of quasi-religious adherents holds enormous sway in the corridors of political power, media, academia, and in the public square. On the other side are pragmatists who rely on facts over faith, data over ideology, and historicity over revisionism. We may finally be at a turning point as a result of scarce energy, galloping electricity prices, pervasive inflation, and compromised national security.

Its time for adults in the room who will act on scientific, economic, and geopolitical reality. Mind you, no one could credit our government with political maturity, an ability to competently deliver on its core mandates, or effectively respond to opportunities and threats outside its ideological bubble.

And the band played on.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Follow

Joe Oliver was the minister of finance and minister of natural resources in the government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Canada.

Read the rest here:

Joe Oliver: In Spite of Overarching Challenges, the Liberals Remain Unduly Fixated on a 'Climate Emergency' - The Epoch Times

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Joe Oliver: In Spite of Overarching Challenges, the Liberals Remain Unduly Fixated on a ‘Climate Emergency’ – The Epoch Times

PQ calling on Liberals to grant them official party status – CTV News Montreal

Posted: at 3:45 pm

The Parti Qubcois (PQ) is appealing to other political parties to grant them official party status, something that would give them more money and more visibility in the national assembly.

Following Monday night's election, they say the system is unfair, as other parties have also complained that the current electoral system is "broken"and is in need of an update.

The current rules state that a party needs at least 12 seats or 20 per cent of the vote but the PQ won only three seats on Oct. 3 and just under 14.61 per cent of the vote.

The PQ said it makes little sense that the Quebec Liberal Party got official party status even though the PQ got more votes and a higher percentage of the vote than the Liberals. The party is also deploring Liberal Leader Dominique Anglade for getting in the way of the separatist party from gaining the official status, and is calling on her to show some"introspection" and "humility."

After Monday's election, the Liberals got 591,077 votes (14.37 per cent of the vote) and 21 seats, whereas the PQ got 600,708 votes but won just three ridings. It harkens back to the old seats versus votes debate that was once again reignited after the 2022 election results came in.

"Given these results, we cannot accept that a party that got less votes than us considers itself legitimate to prevent us from representing more votes than them," said Pascal Brub, the PQ MNA for Matane-Matapdia, on Friday.

By comparison, Qubec solidaire also got more votes than the Liberals 634,535 votes or 15.43 per cent, according to Elections Quebec.

The breakdown of voter support for the major political parties in Quebec after the Oct. 3, 2022 election. (Source: Elections Quebec)

With official party status, the PQ would get about $1 million more to pay for things like additional national assembly staff, research staff, as well as more time in the Salon Bleu to ask questions.

Brub said the system is unfair.

"We can't stand this kind of system that doesn't count every vote in democracy. So the winner takes it all. If you win the seat, you have 100 [per cent] of the power. It cannot work that way anymore," he said Friday.

"And I feel like we're going to have this discussion sooner than later and we're going to be part of that discussion."

In order to be given official party status, MNAs in the national assembly would have to vote unanimously in favour of it. The PQ says for now, the Liberals are holding out.

With files from The Canadian Press

See the original post:

PQ calling on Liberals to grant them official party status - CTV News Montreal

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on PQ calling on Liberals to grant them official party status – CTV News Montreal

Police clash with abortion protesters, as opposing rallies take to the streets of Melbourne – ABC News

Posted: at 3:45 pm

Protesters have clashed with police in Melbourne's cityas people ralliedin the streets to promote opposing messages about abortion rights.

Pro-choice protestersmarched a course through the CBD that was planned to intersect with ananti-abortion march taking place at the same time.

Police worked to stop the marches from crossing paths, with officers liningup across city streets, patrolling on horseback and blocking the paths of the demonstrators.

Bourke Street and Spring Street were closed near parliament due to the protests, delaying traffic and tram services through the CBD.

As one driver sat in a queue ofcars, she said she thought the protests were a waste of taxpayer money and police resources.

"I get that people want to protest and that, but on a Saturday when everyone is out and about trying to do their thing it's ridiculous, take it somewhere else, not in the middle of the CBD," she said.

Victorian Convenor of the Animal Justice Party Bronwyn Currie said the pro-choice protestwas fighting "for the lives of women".

"If abortion is not legal, if it's not affordable, if it's not accessible, it's not going to stop abortions," she said.

"Abortions will continue to happen but women's lives will be in peril and we're not going to let that happen. We are here to fight and demand that we have our human rights protected."

Secretary of the Reason Party, Emma Sinclairsaid anti-abortion sentiment has grown after the overturning ofthe Roe v Wade decision by the United States Supreme Court.

In response to that decision, more than 3,000 people demonstratedin early July Melbourne's CBD in a show of solidarity with abortion rights protesters in the US.

"It is a battle we've been dealing with for centuries, we've taken steps forward to decriminalise and now we're at risk again," Ms Sinclair said.

In August, MP Fiona Patten. leader of the Reason Partyintroduced a bill into state parliament that would haveremoved the right of hospitals that receive taxpayer funding to refuse to offer reproductive health servicesdue to "corporate conscientious objection".

Ms Sinclair said that bill has since beenrejected, but the Reason Partyis still pushing for the changes to be implemented.

With many attendees holding blue and pink balloons, the anti-abortion march gathered close to the pro-choice protestat Treasury Gardens to call for the repeal of Victoria's abortion laws.

Some peoplewore clothing and held a flag with the insignia of thefar-right Proud Boys extremist group.

Others at the marchsaid they were there as a show of support for religious freedoms, following the resignation this week of Essendon CEO Andrew Thorburn,after it emerged the church he leads has publishedarticles that are critical of homosexuality and abortion.

In an attempt to disrupt the anti-abortion event, some pro-choiceprotestersjoined the crowd at Treasury Gardens and held balloons indicating they were part of the anti-abortion march.

They were quickly expelled by police when they started chanting "pro-life is a lie, you don't care if people die".

Former Liberal MP and organiser of the anti-abortion march Bernie Finn said the Liberal Party should change its abortionpolicies.

"If the Liberal Party really cares about human rights and really cares about civil liberties, they will protect everyone, and that includes babies before birth," he said.

Mr Finn, who has been an MP for nearly four decades, was expelled from the Liberal Party in May after posting inflammatory social media contentabout abortion rights.

Mr Finn said Moira Deeming, who was chosen to replace himand contest the upper house Western Metropolitan Region seat atthe November state election, also hasanti-abortion views.

When asked about Ms Deemnig's opinions at a press conference this morning, leader of the Victorian Liberals Matthew Guy said no one should be "demonised for any point of view they express".

"Anyone in this country is entitled to have a view on issues like that, and so long as their debates are sensible and respectful, everyone is entitled to have a view," he said.

"The Liberal Party, we don't penalise people for having different points of view and on that topic [abortion]we've got very broad differences of a point of view."

Read more:

Police clash with abortion protesters, as opposing rallies take to the streets of Melbourne - ABC News

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Police clash with abortion protesters, as opposing rallies take to the streets of Melbourne – ABC News

Life finds a way, but should it? The ethics of genetic engineering – The Trinitonian

Posted: at 3:44 pm

Most people have seen or at least know the premise of the Jurassic Park franchise. Man tries to bring back dinosaurs from the dead and ends up pushing the limits of science too far, with disastrous consequences. The movies serve as a lesson in caution and respecting natural life, portraying the dangers of not doing so through a very fictionalized scenario. Although we may be a long way from bringing back the dinosaurs, the technology used to genetically engineer the DNA of existing species is well-established and could potentially be used to bring extinct species back.

The process of reverse-engineering species involves taking the genetic material from a living species and using the genetic material of similar species in order to achieve a creature similar in genes and physical appearance to an extinct species. This is difficult to do for dinosaurs, as we do not have good enough documentation of their DNA sequences to create an accurate picture, and would instead have to guess by working backwards from reptiles or birds. However, just because Jurassic Park is further away than we might think doesnt mean this technology cannot be used to bring back more recently extinct species, such as certain rhinos, birds and tortoises.

In fact, in 2003, scientists attempted to use genetic engineering technology in order to bring back the extinct Pyrenean ibex, a type of goat. Although the attempt ultimately failed, it showed that scientists have the ability to bring back extinct species if they have access to the genetic material of that animal. With strides in gene-editing technology, it might not be necessary to have the full genetic sequence of a species in order to resurrect it.

CRISPR is a widely known DNA editing technique that involves taking short sequences of DNA and splicing them together to create a new DNA strand. In humans, this experimental technology has been largely used for editing out specific mutations to treat diseases on a genomic level. In extinct animals, it could be used to splice together DNA of existing animals to emulate an extinct animal for which scientists might not have the complete genetic information.

Even if this process has yet to be fully developed, as the possibility becomes more realistic it necessitates thinking through not only if it could happen, but if it should.

Bringing back extinct species, especially those from as far back as the Jurassic period, could have disastrous environmental effects. A study found that reintroducing extinct species to the ecosystem could overall decrease biodiversity, rather than increase, especially if the government or private institutions start allocating more resources towards the revived species rather than our existing life. Bringing back extinct species also means bringing back their sources of food. It means making sure that they are able to withstand different global temperatures, pathogens and predators of today. Without all this, they would have to be kept under close watch in enclosures, requiring even more resources.

The cost of the resources that these revived species would need to survive is expensive, and not just in monetary terms. Currently, species are going extinct 100 to 1,000 times faster than anticipated, meaning that at least 2,000 species go extinct each year (and that number might be a severe underestimate). Instead of focusing efforts on trying to bring back each of these, it would be much more efficient and effective to simply focus on spending money, time and energy on finding ways to reduce the rate at which human activity is killing life on Earth.

Investigating more sustainable sources of energy, developing consumption policies for individuals and corporations and trying to limit our global pollution would all be much more likely to sustain or at least slow down the destruction of our current biodiversity. When we can limit the destruction of biodiversity, then the whole planet will benefit, from improving water and air quality to mitigating food shortages and resource depletion.

The concept of genetic engineering is not inherently bad. It could be used to bring back recently extinct species, i.e., ones that are more adapted to the current environment, without negatively affecting our biodiversity. It could be used to treat life-threatening heritable disorders. But when put into the larger context of our planet and the current climate crisis, it seems to be a waste of resources and time. There are many other ways to improve our planets health without looking to the past, if only we look to preserve the future instead.

Continue reading here:
Life finds a way, but should it? The ethics of genetic engineering - The Trinitonian

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on Life finds a way, but should it? The ethics of genetic engineering – The Trinitonian

To modify or not to modify? Genetic Modification and Gene Editing – A divergence by the UK – Lexology

Posted: at 3:43 pm

Against the backdrop of the cost-of-living crisis it is argued that the UK could bolster food security, combat climate change and lower food prices by relaxing the rules on and around genetic engineering. By designing more resistant crops which are less reliant on fertiliser and are more nutritious, progress could be made. On the other hand, this may be a short-sighted approach to deregulation and taking the risk could result in disastrous consequences.

The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill 2022

The arguments are surfacing as The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill (GT (PB) Bill) which is currently in the House of Commons at the report stage (allowing the House to consider further amendments) heading for its 3rd reading. Much of the debate centres around the understanding of the technology.

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are organisms in which the genetic material (DNA or RNA) has been altered in a way that does not occur naturally, and the modification can be replicated and/or transferred to other cells or organisms. This typically involves the removal of DNA, manipulation outside the cell and reinsertion into the same or other organism. Gene editing (GE) is arguably different as rather than inserting new DNA it edits the organisms own DNA - which could happen over time, but this essentially speeds up the natural process. Both plants and animals can be genetically manipulated.

Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides the general framework for regulating genetically modified (GM) food in the EU with a centralised procedure for applications to place GM food on the EU market. It focusses on the traceability and labelling of GMO and the traceability of food and feed products to ensure a high level of protection of human life and health. GM foods can only be placed on the market after scientific risk assessment of the risks to human health and the environment.

The EU implemented these regulations back in 2001 which heavily restricted the use of GMOs and it has maintained that conservative position since. To continue not to allow GMOs is at odds with other countries, such as Australia, Japan and the US. As the technology developed several member states (including the UK) felt that a more relaxed approach to genetic editing would be beneficial. However, in 2018 the European Court of Justice in, Confederation Paysanne v Premier Minister (C-528/16) decided that there was no real distinction with gene editing (also described as Precision breeding) and they were to be treated as GMOs within the meaning of the GMO Release Directive 2001.

Nevertheless, in the UK in 2019 the then prime minister famously declared that he would liberate the U.K.s extraordinary bio science sector from anti-genetic modification rules. Consequently, since leaving the EU the UK has been working on moving away from the EUs stricter definition of a GMO as evidenced by the GT (PB) Bill.

The Bill defines precision bred to be, if any, or every feature of its genome results from the application of modern biotechnology and every feature of its genome could have resulted from either traditional processes or natural transformation.[1]

It is argued that this removes unnecessary barriers to innovation inherited from the EU to allow the development and marketing of precision bred plants and animals, which will drive economic growth and position the UK as a leading country in which to invest in agri-food research and innovation.

The main elements of the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill are:

Creating a new, simpler regulatory regime for precision bred plants and animals that have genetic changes that could have arisen through traditional breeding or natural processes. No changes are proposed to the regulation of animals until animal welfare is safeguarded.

Introducing two notification systems for research and marketing purposes where breeders and researchers will need to notify Department for Environment, food and Rural Affairs (Defra) of precision bred organisms. The information collected on precision bred organisms will be published on a public register.

Establishing a new science-based authorisation process for food and feed products developed using precision bred organisms.

This is the result of an All-Party Parliamentary Group which called for amendments to be made in 2020 to the, at the time, forthcoming Agriculture Bill 2019-21 (now the Agriculture Act 2020) to allow precision breeding in the UK.

The amendments would require changes to the UK Environmental Protection Act 1990, including changing the use of the EU definition of a GMO which would allow UK scientists, farmers and both plant and animal breeders access to gene editing technologies that other countries outside the EU have.

The focus in the UK is to allow traditional breeding methods to alleviate some of the effects such as extreme weather, food shortages, the cost-of-living crisis and to encourage pest-resistance.

The Genetically Modified Organisms (Deliberate Release) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2022

On 11th April 2022, the Genetically Modified Organisms (Deliberate Release) (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2022 implemented an alignment of GE with the regulation of plants using traditional breeding methods. The Regulations removed the need to submit a risk assessment and seek consent from the Secretary of State before releasing certain GE plants for non-marketing purposes. They apply to England only.

This will allow for the release and marketing of gene edited products under certain circumstances that has so far been prohibited by the EU. It will allow UK scientists to develop plant varieties and animals with beneficial traits that could also occur through traditional breeding and natural processes, while providing safeguards in both marketing and authorisations via regulation.

Taking a Risk?

Another consequence of leaving the EU is that the Food Standards authority (FSA) is now responsible for authorising Novel foods applications in the UK. The FSA points to this need for authorisation as a further check and balance on any risks that may arise from a divergence from EU regulation.

Although it is argued that the Bill may have been drafted a little hastily, any food developed using new technology is subject to the scientific scrutiny of a Novel foods application. If there is a risk of unintended consequences from GE (it is argued that there is a risk of unidentified and untested mutations resulting from gene editing) the role of regulatory authorities such as DEFRA and the FSA is to ensure that no unintended product gains approval.

The debate is becoming increasingly focussed as the cost-of-living crises deepens.

Co-Authored by Laura Hipwell, Trainee Solicitor at CMS.

See the original post:
To modify or not to modify? Genetic Modification and Gene Editing - A divergence by the UK - Lexology

Posted in Genetic Engineering | Comments Off on To modify or not to modify? Genetic Modification and Gene Editing – A divergence by the UK – Lexology