The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: September 15, 2022
A new Constitutional Convention is a very bad idea | Opinion – Knoxville News Sentinel
Posted: September 15, 2022 at 10:03 pm
Many scholars fear it might go far beyond tinkering. Who knows what forces would be unleashed? The rewrite might change the rules for ratification.
William Lyons| Guest columnist
Enjoy exclusive content and premium perks with a Knox News subscription
This year is important, and so is subscribing. Take advantage of our latest offer and enjoy premium content by visiting knoxnews.com/subscribe.
Knoxville News Sentinel
Yes, as many gratuitously say, the Constitution is not perfect. One wonders what a perfect document to outline and limit the role of government would look like. Perfection isnt an option. But disaster is.
Its flaws to some are its strengths to others. Its system of checks and balances slows things down, often to the point ofgridlock. But it does a lot to prevent a runaway executive or an out-of-control Congress. Its basis in federalism ensures state sovereignty that serves as a buffer against centralized national power. It also provides outsized influence to smaller states in the Senate and Electoral College.
Constitution Day was is Sept.17. This is the year to pay more attention. The founding document has been recognized, celebratedand ignored for decades. Now it's not so much ignored as misunderstood.
It is getting a lot more attention lately. Yes, thats good news and bad news. It's both in that more people than ever have opinions. Whats not so good is that many strong opinions on all sides are not grounded in history. Or an understanding of what a constitution can do, and cant do.
The Founding Fathersrecognized the inherent imperfection of any governing document. They provided for amending it. The idea wasn't to make change too difficult, but difficult enough to avoid the immediate passions of the moment. There have been only 27 amendments, and only five since 1960.
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a Constitutional Convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. The second method has never been used. Some are talking about using it now.
A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 of 50 states). The process mitigates against any wholesale, systemic change in favor of a series of focused, limited adjustments.
Hear more Tennessee voices: Get the weekly opinion newsletter for insightful and thought-provoking columns.
But these adjustments matter a lot. The post-Civil War 14th Amendment removes the ability of any state to deny equal protection or due process to individuals. Yes, it took until 1954 and Brown v. Board of Education, but states were no longer free to segregate their schools. States had to provide attorneys for those charged with serious crimes. Federalism, sure, but the national Constitution makes clear that it trumps state Constitutions and state laws.
A smallbut growing number of politicians and critics are making the case that it's time for a new Constitution. They see the amendment process as slow and piecemeal at best. As with so much that has gone astray, the constitutional mischief-makers live on the extremes of the political spectrum.
Some Republicans have been concerned for years and want a chance for a rewrite that limits the national government. Now progressives are singing from the same hymn book. They want to go in the other direction, most notablyto get rid of the Electoral College system that gives smaller states disproportionate influence. The verses differ dramatically, but the chorus is the same. Our Constitution is flawed and needs a full rewrite.
So whats so bad about calling for a new Constitutional Convention? Many scholars fear it might go far beyond tinkering. Thats basically what happened when the founders gathered to revise the existing Articles of Confederation. The revision turned into a total rewrite.
Of course, any total rewrite would have to get the approval of 38 states. That would seem to rule out anything too drastic in either direction. But who knows what forces would beunleashed?The rewrite might change the rules for ratification. This is not solid ground.
Imagine the social media flood of venom. Imagine the CNN, FOX, MSNBC talking-head exhortations. The Hippocratic oath merits an expansion to government. First, do no harm. Going down this road might do great damage.
William Lyons is Director of Policy Partnerships for the Howard Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy and Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Tennessee. He also served as Chief Policy Officer for Knoxville Mayors Bill Haslam, Daniel Brown and Madeline Rogero.
The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Howard Baker Jr. Center for Public Policy or the University of Tennessee.
Read more:
A new Constitutional Convention is a very bad idea | Opinion - Knoxville News Sentinel
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on A new Constitutional Convention is a very bad idea | Opinion – Knoxville News Sentinel
Rodney Hero Receives the 2022 Barbara Sinclair Lecture Award – – Political Science Now
Posted: at 10:03 pm
TheBarbara Sinclair Lecture Awardis presented annually to honor achievement in promoting understanding of the U.S. Congress and legislative politics.
Rodney Herois the Raul Yzaguirre Chair in the School of Politics and Global Studies at Arizona State University, and is also Director of the Center for Latina/os and American Politics Research (CLAPR) at ASU.
His research and teaching focus on American democracy and politics, especially as viewed through the analytical lenses of Latino Politics, Racial/Ethnic Politics, State and Urban Politics, Federalism, and Institutions. He has (co)authored ten books. His 2013 co-authored book, Black-Latino Relations in U.S. National Politics: Beyond Conflictor Cooperation,was chosen for the 2014 Best Book on Latino Politics Award from the Latino Caucus of the APSA. He has also authored and co-authored a number of articles in scholarly journals, and chapters in edited books, including in two of the recent editions of Congress Reconsidered (by Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer). Among other of his books are: Latinos and the U.S. Political System: Two-tiered Pluralism (1992); Faces of Inequality: Social Diversity in American Politics (which was selected for the APSAs Woodrow Wilson Award in 1999); and co-author of Multi-Ethnic Moments: The Politics of Urban Education Reform (2006). He was a co-principal investigator on the Latino National Survey (completed in 2006).
He has also served on the editorial board of a number of major political science journals, as well as president of the APSA (2014-15) and of other professional associations.
Citation from the Award Committee:
Professor Rodney Herois this years selection for the Barbara Sinclair Lecture, given to a preeminent scholar who promotes the understanding of the U.S. Congress and legislative politics. The selection committee noted that Professor Hero has done this in a wide variety of ways. Hero is considered one of the most esteemed scholars of racial and ethnic politics, and has devoted a good deal of his scholarship to the representation of racial groups and interests in congressional governance in ways that have served to bridge the study of citizens and the study of political institutions. His work on substantive and descriptive representation of Blacks and Latinos in Congress is nothing short of path breaking. As well, his work contributed immensely to our understanding of the role that inequality plays in social and welfare policy making at the federal level. These represent only a small portion of his immense research that spans other areas, including urban and state politics, political behavior, and elections.
Rodney is currently Raul Yzaguirre Chair in the School of Politics and Global Studies at Arizona State University. He previously held faculty positions as professor of political science and the Haas Chair in Diversity and Democracy at the University of California, Berkeley (2010-17);the Packey J. Dee Professor of American Democracy in the Department of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame (2000-10); at the University of Colorado at Boulder (1989-2000); and at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs (1980-87). Hero is the recipient of many best book and paper awards, including the Ralph J. Bunche Award, the Latino Politics Best Book Award, and the Woodrow Wilson book award. In 2007-08, Rodney served as President of the Midwest Political Science Association, and in 2014-15 he served as President of the American Political Science Association.
APSA thanks the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at the American University School of Public Affairs for its support of the award and the committee members for their service:Dr. David C. Barker, American University (Co-Chair); Megan McConaughey (Co-Chair); Dr. Scott Adler of theUniversity of Colorado, Boulder; Dr. Ashley English of the University of North Texas; and Dr. Kristin Kanthak of the University of Pittsburgh.
View original post here:
Rodney Hero Receives the 2022 Barbara Sinclair Lecture Award - - Political Science Now
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on Rodney Hero Receives the 2022 Barbara Sinclair Lecture Award – – Political Science Now
Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service: Migratory Bird Hunting; 20222023 Seasons for Certain Migratory Game Birds – Government…
Posted: at 10:03 pm
B-334574
September 7, 2022
The Honorable Thomas R. CarperChairmanThe Honorable Shelley Moore CapitoRanking MemberCommittee on Environment and Public WorksUnited States Senate
The Honorable Ral M. GrijalvaChairmanThe Honorable Bruce WestermanRanking MemberCommittee on Natural ResourcesHouse of Representatives
Subject: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service: Migratory Bird Hunting; 20222023 Seasons for Certain Migratory Game Birds
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) titled Migratory Bird Hunting; 20222023 Seasons for Certain Migratory Game Birds (RIN: 1018-BF07). We received the rule on August 26, 2022. It was published in the Federal Register as a final rule on August 19, 2022. 87 Fed. Reg. 50965. The effective date is August 19, 2022.
According to FWS, this rule prescribes the seasons, hours, areas, and daily bag and possession limits for hunting migratory birds. FWS stated that taking of migratory birds is prohibited unless specifically provided for by annual regulations. FWS also stated that this rule permits the taking of designated species during the 20222023 season.
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) requires a 60-day delay in the effective date of a major rule from the date of publication in the Federal Register or receipt of the rule by Congress, whichever is later. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(3)(A). The 60-day delay in effective date can be waived, however, for any rule that establishes, modifies, opens, closes, or conducts a regulatory program for a commercial, recreational, or subsistence activity related to hunting, fishing, or camping. 5 U.S.C. 808(1). In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 808(1), FWS stated that it did not defer the effective date of this final rule because the rule establishes regulations for hunting.
Enclosed is our assessment of FWSs compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Shari Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-6398.
Shirley A. JonesManaging Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc: Gregory W. FlemingWildlife BiologistFish and Wildlife Service
ENCLOSURE
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULEISSUED BY THEDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICETITLEDMIGRATORY BIRD HUNTING; 20222023 SEASONSFOR CERTAIN MIGRATORY GAME BIRDS(RIN: 1018-BF07)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) prepared an economic analysis for the 20222023 migratory bird hunting season. FWS estimated the consumer surplus of three alternatives for duck hunting regulations (estimates for other species are not quantified due to lack of data). FWS noted that the duck hunting regulatory alternatives are (1) issue restrictive regulations allowing fewer days than those issued during the 20212022 season, (2) issue moderate regulations allowing more days than those in alternative 1, and (3) issue liberal regulations similar to the regulations in the 20212022 season. FWS stated that for the 20222023 season, it chose alternative 3, with an estimated consumer surplus across all flyways of $329 million. FWS also stated that it chose alternative 3 for the 20092010 through 20212022 seasons.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603605, 607, and 609
According to FWS, this rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under RFA. FWS estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend approximately $2.2 billion at small businesses in 2022.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 15321535
FWS determined and certified that this rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local or state government, or private entities. Therefore, FWS stated, this rule is not a significant regulatory action under the Act.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.
On August 31, 2021, FWS published a proposed rule to amend title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations at part 20. 86 Fed. Reg. 48649. Additionally, FWS stated that it conducted an open meeting with Flyway Council Consultants on September 2829, 2021, at which participants reviewed information on the current status of migratory game birds and developed recommendations for the 20222023 regulations. On February 2, 2022, FWS published the proposed frameworks for the 20222023 season migratory bird hunting regulations. 87 Fed. Reg. 5946. On July 15, 2022, FWS published the final frameworks for migratory game bird hunting regulations, from which state wildlife conservation agency officials selected seasons, hours, areas, and limits for hunting migratory birds during the 20222023 season. 87 Fed. Reg. 42598 (July 15, 2022 Final Rule). FWS stated that this final rule is the culmination of the annual rulemaking process allowing migratory game bird hunting, which started with the August 31, 2021, proposed rule. Lastly, FWS stated that this final rule sets the migratory game bird hunting seasons based on the input from the states and that it previously addressed all comments in the July 15, 2022 Final Rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 35013520
According to FWS, this rule does not contain any new collection of information that requires approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under PRA. FWS stated that OMB has previously approved the information collection requirements associated with migratory bird surveys and the procedures for establishing annual migratory bird hunting seasons under the following OMB Control Numbers: 1018-0019, North American Woodcock Singing Ground Survey (expires Feb. 29, 2024); 10180023, Migratory Bird Surveys, 50 CFR 20.20 (expires Apr. 30, 2023); and 1018-0171, Establishment of Annual Migratory Bird Hunting Seasons, 50 CFR Part 20 (expires Oct. 31, 2024).
Statutory authorization for the rule
FWS promulgated this final rule pursuant to sections 703712, and 742aj of title 16, United States Code.
Executive Order No. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
According to FWS, OMBs Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this final rule is economically significant under the Order.
Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)
FWS stated that this final rule will not impose significant federalism effects and will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
Read the original:
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service: Migratory Bird Hunting; 20222023 Seasons for Certain Migratory Game Birds – Government…
doctors – childfree – reddit
Posted: at 10:02 pm
Updates to the Childfree Friendly Doctors List are live again!
We welcome /u/torienne who has joined us as a wiki editor
For our members using the Reddit mobile app: we recommend accessing the lists via a web browser either on desktop or mobile.
Disclaimer: this list is not a replacement for a consultation with a medical professional trained in gynecology/urology nor is it a diagnostic tool. As this list is dynamic and frequently being updated, we encourage our members to exercise diligence when arranging a consultation with a doctor on this list. Should you have a positive experience and wish to add your doctor to the list, we encourage advising your doctor before messaging the moderator team. More information about sterilisation can be found here.
Our original list is FULL! As such, we have split the list up into sublists to faciliate ongoing updates and additions of new doctors. Please see below for our new lists:
United States - Alabama to Georgia
United States - Hawaii to New York
United States - North Carolina to Wyoming (including Puerto Rico)
International - for supportive doctors outside of the US
We are currently accepting new listings from doctors who have completed sterilisation (tubal ligation, bilateral salpingectomy, vasectomy) for CHILDFREE people. Our definition of childfree is, "childfree refers to those who do not have and do not ever want children (whether biological, adopted, step or otherwise)". In order to add your doctor or update an existing doctor's listing, please send the moderator team a message with the following information:
The doctor's name and a link to either a practice website or online listing. If this is not possible, then an address (in full, no abbreviations like CA or PA) and phone number is acceptable.
The procedure completed
Optional: your age, marital status, and childfree status
Optional: a short (max 100 word) statement on your experience. Some suggestions for things to include are information on wait times, insurance, cost, or whether you experienced any bingos, for example "you'll change your mind when you hit 30" or "you'll feel differently when you find the right guy/gal".
How do I add to the list?
Ideally, if you have a Reddit account, send the mod team a message via this link. One of us will send an acknowledgement reply/receipt. We recommend avoiding chat requests, PMs or comment replies, these will disappear into the void and your submission probably wont make it into the list. If you have received no communication from us within a week please send another message.
I'm a gynecologist/urologist/physician/other health care professional. Can I submit myself to this list?
To our health care providers: thank you for your willingness to help our members! We are welcoming health care professionals who are willing to provide permanent contraception procedures (examples including tubal ligation, bilateral salpingectomy, vasectomy) for CHILDFREE people that you deem medically and consent-wise fit for the procedure. If you would like to come on board, please message us via this link with the following:
Your name and primary practice location, whether this is a private practice or consulting rooms within a hospital. Potential patients may travel from interstate to seek your services and as such as much detail in this regard as you are willing/able to provide is appreciated.
Any insurances you accept or federal or state financial aid programs you are a part of.
If it is safe for you to advertise as such, whether you are LGBT+ friendly and/or offer gender affirming procedures.
Any age or marital status limitations that you have. Yes, our members do get refused because "what if you get married and your husband wants a baby?".
Wait, do you really want recommendations from health care professionals who aren't gynecologists/urologists?
Yes, we do accept recommendations from other health care and allied professionals who are supportive of the childfree choice. We have therapists, psychologists and psychiatrists on our list and this is particularly important in situations where specialists demand a psychiatric evaluation before sterilising a patient.
Why can't I add my doctor to the list myself?
Until the last 12 months the list was open to edit by anyone. As a result people would:
A) add doctors because they saw on their website that they sterilise people
B) add doctors that sterilised them after they had children. For example, recently we got a very confused message from a mum of two saying that her doctor had been removed in error and please reinstate him because he sterilised her.
C) adding childfree unfriendly doctors to try and dissuade members from getting sterilised.
D) add doctors who are childfree or childless regardless of whether they were supportive or not.
In response to this we closed the list to member edits. So if you send a message and dont see your doctor on the list right away, thats why. In addition, due to many people contributing to the list (which is great!) different states and countries have different formatting and different amounts of information. Right now we recommend clicking your state or country which will be towards the top of the page.
Why isnt my doctor on the list? I messaged months ago and no one replied.
There are some instances where peoples doctors dont get added to the list. The main overarching reason for this is because the submitter hasnt had the procedure yet. We try not to add doctors until theyve actually done the procedure because what can happen sometimes is other doctors, the hospital, or the insurance can kick up a fuss about the procedure and effectively convince the doctor not to do it. To save distress to people who seek sterilisation from doctors on the list, we ask members to wait until they are sterilised before asking for their doctor to be added to the list. The exceptions are in cases where a general practitioner has given a referral (at that point their job is done) or in countries where there are very few/no supportive doctors, where we'll leave a note saying the doctor is yet to be verified.
The other reason is due to a submission that doesnt have enough information to be useful to people accessing the list. It's really important to provide enough information for other people to find the doctor, especially if they're travelling from out of state and may not be familiar with local landmarks or nicknames. This could be a clinic address or phone number but the best is a link to a website or online directory listing if theyre with a hospital. Please do NOT send us your name/address/phone number, this is not necessary for your submission. We also don't need your in depth medical history or history of trauma to get your doctor on the list.
Your listings are outdated/inaccurate. How can I have a doctor removed from the list?
The best thing you can do in this case is get in touch! Our policy is to put a note on their submission saying a member has had a bad experience with some details. Then if there are subsequent bad experiences they will be removed. Exceptions to this are extreme/criminal cases of malpractice. For example, a doctor was immediately removed who is being investigated for IVF related malpractice. We use this tiered approach because different people have different thresholds of bad. Person A might think having to see a psychologist first is just par for the course, person B might be extremely distressed by this requirement. If someones retired or moved its great if you know it to send their updated details.
I don't want to be identified as a patient. What if I message you from a throwaway?
We ensure that there is no connection between your personal details/patient information and your entry on the list. Your username is not linked in any way to your submission or recommendation. We discourage messages from throwaway accounts as it is limits verifiability of your submission. If you choose to use a throwaway you will be sent follow up questions within 72 hours and your doctor will not be added unless you can answer them. Remember your throwaway password!
Alternative lists may be found below:
See the original post here:
Posted in Childfree
Comments Off on doctors – childfree – reddit
INTERNATIONAL CHILDFREE DAY – August 1, 2023 – National Today
Posted: at 10:02 pm
INTERNATIONAL CHILDFREE DAY - August 1, 2023 - National Today Skip to contentGot an idea for a holiday? Send it to us
Submit Now
International Childfree Day is observed on August 1 every year as a day to understand and support couples who have decided not to have children. It was started in 1973 by the National Alliance for Optional Parenthood. The organization was founded in 1972 in California to propagate and normalize the notion that people can choose not to have children. Celebration of the day was revived in 2013 by Laura Carroll since couples all over the world still face criticism, rejection, and occasionally, rage from other people when they decide to remain childfree.
The idea of children continuing family values is as old as mankind. It is one of the traits that helped us become the superior species on this planet. We share our DNA, blood, flesh, knowledge, experience, emotions, and much more with our children. Our society has increased in size and strength through this bond, and family values have become an important aspect of every persons life. Every religion and culture in the world stresses the importance of matrimony and having children. Some people even look down on those who do not have children.
As the years progress, family and social structures have changed. The human population is now higher than it has ever been. The cost of living is only increasing, but living standards, access to medical care, and independence have decreased along with this. During the medieval ages up until recently, having more children was considered safer for the legacy of a family, but nowadays, most developed families have up to a maximum of three kids. Some countries even have a single child policy to control the problem of overpopulation.
People have started to identify the importance of raising a responsible child. The idea that one does not need children has also spread, with people choosing a carefree and independent life over the strings of lifelong responsibilities.
1973
The Legalization of Abortion
Abortion is now legal after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
1973
The National Alliance for Optional Parenthood
An organization that supports people who choose to have a child-free life is established.
2013
The Childfree Movement is Resurrected
Author, Laura Carroll, resurrects the initiative of the National Alliance for Optional Parenthood.
2020
The Annual Non-Parent of the Year Award
Elizabeth Hintz, an American doctoral candidate, wins the Annual Non-Parent of the Year award.
Society considers childlessness in marriage as deviant behavior. This may lead to unwanted effects in a relationship, especially if one partner is not ready to accept the situation.
If the decision is a result of circumstances outside your control then it is normal for a person to regret it. However, if a voluntary decision is made to choose a child-free life after thorough discussion, there are no grounds for regret in most cases.
Its okay to not want children. It is okay if you are not sure whether you want a child or not. What is not okay is that you get pressured to have children when you are not ready to do so.
Write an appreciation note and send it to a child-free couple you know. Mention how proud and supportive you are of their choice.
Create a social media campaign on the advantages of a child-free life. Talk about the achievements of people who dont have children and applaud them through your campaign.
List the child-free couples in your locality. Choose the best performing couple in terms of financial stability, family integrity, and career choice, and gift them something nice.
There are 15.2 million adults in the U.S. who are childless.
Childfree is the term for people who have chosen not to have kids, while childless is for those who would love to but can't have them.
A person can save roughly half a million dollars if he or she is child-free.
A dink relationship is one where both partners earn an income and do not have children.
There are about 76% of millennials who choose to have pets over children.
Choosing to have a child or not is a personal choice. It is high time we gave more importance to personal choices.
Some couples recognize and understand that they are fully capable of providing a better life for a child. Such responsible decisions should be appreciated.
Acceptance in society is important for both childless and childfree couples. This day is great for recognizing and helping the people in these groups.
Every day is a holiday!Receive fresh holidays directly toyourinbox.
[google_sign_in]
[fbl_login_button redirect="/email-confirmed/?signup=fb" hide_if_logged="" size="large" type="login_with" show_face="true" onlogin="fbl_loginCheck" scope="email,public_profile" use-continue-as="true" auto-logout-link="false"]
[wpforms id="8315" title="false" description="false"]
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
//
View post:
INTERNATIONAL CHILDFREE DAY - August 1, 2023 - National Today
Posted in Childfree
Comments Off on INTERNATIONAL CHILDFREE DAY – August 1, 2023 – National Today
Childfree Woman Wonders If She’s A Jerk For Refusing To Help Out …
Posted: at 10:02 pm
When it comes to the debate over who grinds away more at work, few things get people more worked up than comparing employees with kids and without. After all, its no secret that working parents have to juggle a lot because creating schedules that find the perfect balance between meetings and field trips is quite a daunting task. But when childfree co-workers have to work harder to pick up their slack, tensions inevitably arise.
This stands at the center of a dilemma Redditor randome_5682984 has recently found herself in. As the 28-year-old non-parent shared in a post on the AITA community, she is sick and tired of her always pregnant colleague who uses her children as a free pass to get out of work commitments shes not inclined to do.
So when the mother-of-five tried yet again to pawn off her tasks on the user, she refused to cover for her and was met with resentment. Unsure of what to think of the situation, the childfree woman reached out online to gain perspective on whether she was wrong or not. Scroll down to read the story in full, as well as the reactions that followed, and be sure to weigh in on the discussion in the comments.
Image credits: cottonbro
Image credits: Matilda Wormwood (not the actual photo)
Image credits: randome_5682984
The share of people without children and who never felt the urge to have children is growing, so conflicts like this might be more common than we think. According to Pew Research Center, 44% of American non-parents aged 18 to 49 said theyre unlikely or not too likely to have children ever. In England and Wales, women who turned 45 in 2018 were twice as likely (19%) not to have children as their mothers generation (9%).
Despite these growing numbers, childfree people still encounter unfair treatment at work. Some report being stressed and burned out because theyre expected to do more. At the same time, they face certain barriers. Researchers from George Washington University and the University of Pennsylvania found that analytically-talented, single professional women are disadvantaged even early in their careers.
This happens because they are often stereotyped as lacking leadership abilities and are often seen as too masculine for leadership the same traits that benefit single men. Moreover, according to the study, they also lacked the communal, relational leadership qualities expected of women who were coupled and had children.
Erin Spurling, a writer, editor, and founder of Curiously Childfree explained to Bored Panda in an earlier interview that the decision to opt out of parenthood is often hard to grasp for people who see kids as a crucial part of having a fulfilled family. A very prescriptive view of life has been presented for such a long time. Life is typically seen as grow up, get married, buy a house, have children. Lots of people dont consider something outside of that norm, she explained.
According to Erin, childfree people face double standards at work because they are generally viewed as having more time, no responsibilities, and lots of flexibility. However, people tend to forget that those without children also have other commitments: second jobs, caring for relatives, volunteering, pets, hobbies, and more.
But there is also an attitude that caring for children is more important than anything a childfree person might be involved with in their life, which can be frustrating. It can make you feel like youre not valued, your time isnt important and your choices arent respected.
The founder of Curiously Childfree even mentioned she stumbled upon a job ad that stated parents get an extra weeks leave every year. That could be hard to accept as a childfree person, but I would argue it might be even harder for a childless person who very much wanted to have children but then couldnt, and now they find themselves covering the extra workload of those lucky enough to have been successful in their choice to have children.
She continued: I do think it can be true that we have more flexibility. But I dont think that means we should be expected to cover work for those who do have children.
One way to try and change these attitudes is to set healthy boundaries, so Erin advised you to stand your ground but not in a confrontational way. When you find yourself being judged or devalued because of your choice, it can be easy to quickly become defensive in these situations but discussing it calmly will be far more helpful to both sides.
Its not that childfree people cant or dont want to help if a colleague needs to leave because a child is unwell for example, its about that help being a two-way street. Sticking to your own boundaries can be tough but once you start doing it, it does become easier, people will adjust and you will feel happier because youll be living within your own limits, Erin concluded.
Read the rest here:
Childfree Woman Wonders If She's A Jerk For Refusing To Help Out ...
Posted in Childfree
Comments Off on Childfree Woman Wonders If She’s A Jerk For Refusing To Help Out …
Tubal Ligation and Vasectomy: Everything You Should Know – theSkimm
Posted: at 10:02 pm
Since Roe was overturned, trigger laws prohibiting abortion have already gone into effect in several states. This has left some people particularly those who are childfree by choice or have completed families worried about their future access to abortion. So theyre considering a new measure, even in states where abortion remains a protected right: sterilization and long-term birth control. Thats according to the physicians we talked to:
Dr. Amy Addante, an OB-GYN based in Illinois.
Dr. Bobby Najari, an assistant professor at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine and director of the Male Infertility Program at NYU Langone in New York.
We asked both docs all about tubal ligation, vasectomies, and IUDs. Because we figured there are people out who dont want a(nother) baby.
Sterilization. Aka surgery to prevent babymaking. There are two types.
You mightve heard the phrase getting your tubes tied. Were talking about your fallopian tubes here. Theyre the pathways that an egg takes from the ovary to the uterus. During its journey, it may get fertilized and then implant on the uterine wall. But with a tubal ligation, a womans fallopian tubes are blocked, cut, or what Dr. Addante says she sees most often in her practice removed. If you imagine it as a tunnel, were just trying to find a way to disconnect the tunnel, she said. (FWIW, removing it completely may lower the risk of ovarian cancer.)
Tubal ligation is best for someone who knows with certainty that she doesnt want to have any (more) kids. Because its not meant to be reversible. Its also effective immediately. The chance of pregnancy is less than 1%, according to the latest data available, which is more than 20 years old. So it could be even more effective today.
Its the only kind of safe long-term birth control option thats available for men. And its effective more than 99.9% of the time, Dr. Najari said. A vasectomy works by preventing sperm from getting into the semen. It involves a small puncture or incision in the scrotum to cut and seal a part of the vas deferens (the usual exit route for sperm).
A vasectomy is best for someone confident about his decision not to have any (more) kids. Unlike most tubal ligations, a vasectomy doesnt usually require general anesthesia (just local) and can be done right in the doctors office, Dr. Najari said. A vasectomy is also meant to be a permanent procedure. But reversals do exist. And it typically takes about three months before its most effective.
An intrauterine device. Aka IUD, which goes into the uterus and has a failure rate of 1% or less. You can also call it a LARC (long-acting reversible contraception). There are a few IUD options (see: hormonal and copper versions) and each has different FDA limits for how long it can last. But generally, their lifespans range from three to 10 years. All IUDs are inserted by a doc through the cervix and into the uterus. And you can take them out any time that you decide you want to have a baby.
Possibly. ACOGs official stance is that all patients regardless of age and whether they have kids are candidates for tubal ligation.But not every doctor will be willing or able to perform the surgery. Whether thats for personal reasons or because they work at a religiously affiliated hospital that prohibits sterilization entirely. When I did my residency training at a Catholic hospital in St. Louis, we were not allowed to offer our patients tubal ligations, Dr. Addante said.
And note: Some state lawmakers have proposed legislation banning the use of contraceptives like IUDs. But birth control remains legal everywhere in the US.
Men can get turned away, too, Dr. Najari said. I do hear from people that theyve gotten pushback from providers because of age or lack of children. Some docs may worry their patients will regret not being able to have kids. But an analysis co-authored by Dr. Najari found that men whod gotten vasectomies and were child-free didnt have higher rates of regret than dads whod gotten the procedure.
Dr. Addantes advice: If one provider tells you no, go to somebody else.
Itll depend on what your insurance coverage is like. A number of plans fully or mostly cover IUDs and sterilization. Out of pocket, a vasectomy or an IUD might cost between a few hundred dollars to around $1,000, and a tubal ligation as much as $6,000.
If you dont want any (or any more) kids, it might make sense to consider an IUD or sterilization. Because it could be cost-effective in the long-term (think: no more pills or condoms). And, as Dr. Addante put it, youd be able to set it and forget it.
This content is for informational and educational purposes only.It does not constitute a medical opinion, medical advice, or diagnosis or treatment of any particular condition.
More:
Tubal Ligation and Vasectomy: Everything You Should Know - theSkimm
Posted in Childfree
Comments Off on Tubal Ligation and Vasectomy: Everything You Should Know – theSkimm
JFK ‘We Choose the Moon’ 60th anniversary and U.S. space program advances – NPR
Posted: at 10:00 pm
Sixty years ago, President John F. Kennedy delivered an address at Rice University to inspire Americans to support NASA's mission to the moon. In what became known as his "We Choose the Moon" speech, Kennedy promised to put an American astronaut on the moon before the end of the 1960s. Anonymous/AP hide caption
Sixty years ago, President John F. Kennedy delivered an address at Rice University to inspire Americans to support NASA's mission to the moon. In what became known as his "We Choose the Moon" speech, Kennedy promised to put an American astronaut on the moon before the end of the 1960s.
It's been 60 years since President John F. Kennedy spoke to a crowd of more than 30,000 about America's race to the moon. His "We Choose the Moon" speech became a pivotal moment in the space program, rallying the nation behind a mission that was far from certain.
"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard," Kennedy told the crowd at Rice University in Houston. The president promised to put a man on the moon before the end of the decade, and seven years later, he delivered, with the Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969.
Space exploration has come a long way since Kennedy kicked America's space program into overdrive.
A NASA rover traversing the surface of Mars. NASA hide caption
A NASA rover traversing the surface of Mars.
One of NASA's most incredible achievements may very well be when it landed a rover on Mars, which took place less than 30 years after a man first touched down on the moon.
Scientists have gone back to Mars more than a handful of times since that first Mars rover landing in 1997, using sophisticated robots to explore the red planet and its potential for supporting life.
NASA astronaut Robert Hines climbed into a Tesla before boarding a SpaceX launch in April 2021. Aubrey Gemignani/AP hide caption
NASA astronaut Robert Hines climbed into a Tesla before boarding a SpaceX launch in April 2021.
When Kennedy announced that the United States was going to put a man on the moon, the then-Soviet Union and the U.S. were the main players in the space race. But now, there are multiple companies focused on space exploration, including Elon Musk's SpaceX.
Musk aims to send a crewed mission to Mars in 2029, 60 years after the moon landing.
He's not the only billionaire looking to leave the planet. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has Blue Origin, and British business mogul Richard Branson has Virgin Galactic. Earlier this year, Branson's company opened up ticket sales for commercial passenger flights that it says will start in 2022, at a price of $450,000 per reservation.
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope captured images of some of the oldest galaxies in the universe this summer. NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI hide caption
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope captured images of some of the oldest galaxies in the universe this summer.
The James Webb Space Telescope relayed images of some of the oldest galaxies in the universe earlier this summer. The $10 billion observatory launched last December on a mission to find the first galaxies that formed after the Big Bang.
But Webb does more than just taking stellar photos. Scientists are using the telescope to study the atmospheres of other planets and to better understand the fundamentals of dark matter.
An illustration of what a base camp on the moon's surface could look like. Astronauts could find themselves living on the moon for up to two months, according to NASA. NASA hide caption
An illustration of what a base camp on the moon's surface could look like. Astronauts could find themselves living on the moon for up to two months, according to NASA.
Fifty years after the last moon landing, NASA announced it's going back. Astronauts will once again touch down on the lunar surface to study rock and ice samples.
The moon missions could serve as a stepping stone to the grand plan of putting a man on Mars by establishing a permanent human presence on the lunar surface through NASA's Artemis program.
The goal is to establish an Artemis Base Camp on the lunar surface, including a rover and lunar cabin, where astronauts may live for as long as two months at a time, according to NASA.
View post:
JFK 'We Choose the Moon' 60th anniversary and U.S. space program advances - NPR
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on JFK ‘We Choose the Moon’ 60th anniversary and U.S. space program advances – NPR
Exploring the future of space exploration at Moonshot Museum – blooloop
Posted: at 10:00 pm
The Moonshot Museum is scheduled to open in Pittsburghs Northside on Saturday 15 October 2022. Focusing exclusively on space exploration, this new museum will afford visitors unprecedented access to real spacecraft and space industry professionals.
Built on a unique partnership with space robotics company Astrobotic, Moonshot Museum is co-located at Astrobotic Technologys headquarters. Here, it will offer a window into the construction of real lunar spacecraft. A groundbreaking living lab focused on space career readiness, Moonshot Museum has a mission centred on inspiring young people to find their place in the future of space exploration.
Sam Moore, the museums founding executive director, spoke to blooloop.
Moore has held programmatic and operational leadership roles at a number of respected museums and cultural nonprofits. This includes the National Aviary, the Senator John Heinz History Center, the Missouri Historical Society, and St. Louiss Campbell House Museum. He is also a past member of the graduate faculty in museum studies at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.
Moore serves on the leadership team for the Public Relations & Marketing Professional Network of the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) and is a past member of the Creativity & Experimentation Task Force for the American Association for State and Local History (AASLH) and AAMs National Program Committee.
We are doing something pretty unusual and unique here. Its been a lot of fun to work on, he says: Its been a wild ride and an exciting journey.
Moore has always been fascinated by museums:
They have been the place I have always wanted to go to on vacation since I was eight years old. Im in my thirties, and its still the case. I love storytelling; I love listening to great storytellers. And I love an opportunity to learn about things that I dont encounter in my everyday life or to learn more about the things I do encounter. I feel museums do a terrific job of that.
He has worked in the sector for just over a decade. He says:
I started at a historic house museum in St. Louis, Missouri, where Im from. My background is in history museums, mostly. Although, I worked at the National Aviary most recently, which is a bird zoo rather than a history museum, which was interesting.
Space, science and technology are not in my background. However, one of the exciting things we talk about at Moonshot is the fact there really is a place for everyone in the space industry and in space exploration.
That includes folks like me. People who have a background in the arts and humanities, and who you definitely dont want building a spacecraft or doing the math thats involved, but who can talk about the work. People who can design for the future of space, and write for the future of space. You need people and policymakers in space.
These are some of the stories the Moonshot project will tell, he explains:
My journey has been an interesting mirror of what our mission is at Moonshot Museum, which is to make connections for kids and for our community, regardless of what their interests are and regardless of what their backgrounds are.
Outlining the projects beginnings, he adds:
The museum grew out of a company here in Pittsburgh called Astrobotic. This is a company which builds lunar landers and lunar rovers. It is going to return America to the surface of the Moon for the first time in 50 years this year, when the Peregrine Lander lands.
Over the course of the past three years, Astrobotic has grown from a small company with around 20 employees, to a larger concern with almost 200 employees. In addition, it has secured more than $400 million in NASA and commercial contracts.
With that growth, they needed a bigger building. In deciding where they were going to put that building, they decided on the north side of Pittsburgh, in the Manchester neighbourhood specifically. They also decided to leave about 3000 square feet at the front of the building free for Moonshot Museum.
What Moonshot Museum was, exactly, beyond an opportunity for the community to come in and experience the real-time work of the 21st-century space industry, remained to be seen. And that is where I came into the picture.
Moonshot Museum grew from the notion of giving the local community a front-row seat.
They spun out a non-profit, he explains. I dont actually work for Astrobotic; I work for a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organisation here in Pittsburgh that just happens to be tightly partnered with a space company so tightly that were in the same building. Ive got a wall of windows that look into the space where theyre doing their work.
One question Moore often gets in the context of space and the opportunity that space holds is about the ethics of looking beyond this planet when we have big problems to face here on Earth.
Between climate change, global hunger, resource and habitat preservation, weve got a lot of big issues to solve here. The reality is that space can hold a lot of the answers to those topics. There is no harsher environment that we know of than the surface of the moon. Theres no atmosphere, its covered in razor-sharp dust, theres really intense radiation.
By exploring the moon and by spending more time in zero-G, he contends, we can learn how to grow food in harsh environments:
We can track climate change in a way that is much more effective. The research can provide us with some solutions and next steps on how we can make a change here on Earth. We can also look at space when it comes to the environment and sustainability. The reality is that we have one blue planet to live on. The Moon holds a lot of potential. Mars and the other planets in our solar system hold a lot of potential. But none of them is a replacement for Earth.
We are not going to start society anew on another planet. Weve got this one, and we need to start thinking really seriously about how were treating it.
As an example, he says:
When we look at strip mining the Earth versus strip mining a barren rock that is orbiting the sun and has more metal in it than humanity has ever mined, looking outward, so that we can sustain what remains here on Earth, at this point, is going to be really important for us.
These are the conversations the Moonshot Museum team is having with middle and high school students:
Are we littering on the Moon by sending up a Lander and leaving the Lander there? No; were pushing science forward so that we can have Landers 15, 20, 25 years from now that have the capabilities to go back and forth. Do we want to mar the surface of the Moon? Lets assess what preservation looks like on another planetary body, and weigh that against what preservation on the one planet we have here looks like.
Those have been the types of fun, dense questions that 12 and 13-year-olds have a lot to say about. There isnt a clear answer either way.
Moore is keen to foster such conversations, addressing societal, policy and big-picture issues alongside the engineering and technology conversations.
Touching on the factors that differentiate Moonshot from conventional space museums, he says:
On the one hand, when you visit us, you are also visiting the headquarters of a commercial space company. Were in the same building. We share a lobby and are located in what is, today, the largest commercial lunar logistics campus in the world. That sets us apart, right off the bat.
The other big difference is that a wall of windows within our museum space looks into the clean room assembly area where Astrobotic is building spacecraft. On one side is an active construction zone where Im building a museum. On the other side, it is a highly controlled, clean room environment with people in bunny suits, assembling the Paragon spacecraft. Thats going to be the backdrop for the work we do all the time.
The third that makes us different is that were going to be a lot less artefact-based than Im used to in my background in history museums. In history museums, you see incredible things, you read incredible stories about those things, and you move on to the next case.
At Moonshot Museum, there will be relatively few artefacts on display. Because the museum is predominantly concerned with the present and the future, there arent many items to display, Moore points out, beyond the real-time work happening in the clean room next door:
Our space is going to be very experiential. It will take you on a simulated lunar mission where you encounter real challenges that space industry professionals face every day. You will also encounter career opportunities that exist across the STEAM spectrum of opportunity.
The museum is a comparatively diminutive 3000 square feet in size. He comments:
We are not the largest museum in the world by any means. What we have focused on in designing our space is creating an impactful, meaningful experience. One that leaves you with knowledge you didnt possess before. Whatever your age, it will also offer some tangible next steps you can take to get plugged into whats happening in space exploration here in Pittsburgh, and in the country.
In terms of interactive elements, he explains:
We have a few different stations throughout the museum zones. You will make your way through a lab environment designed to look a lot like the clean room on the other side of the glass. Here, you will assemble a lunar rover and watch them operate, digitally, on the surface of the Moon.
We worked with the engineering team at Astrobotic as well as with some university partners to think through what a good challenge would be. We dont hand a 12-year-old the challenge of building a lunar rover. But we do hand them a challenge that takes them through the critical thinking process and the trade-offs that engineers have to make when they decide how a rover is powered, what tools it has on board, and how it makes its way across the surface of the Moon.
There is also a station where visitors can explore the Moons surface:
When you go on a mission experience inside the museum, youll choose a site for your futuristic settlement. You will have to take all the elements that make the Moon a challenging place to explore into consideration:exposure to radiation, huge temperature swings; the danger of lunar dust; communications issues, if youre on the far side of the moon; access to water; ice: all of these different factors.
Then there is a zone that looks at art and humanities.
You will be challenged to design a mission patch for your mission. We will present you with some examples of really terrific mission patches throughout history, from Apollo to Astrobotics mission patch, to some Artemis mission patches from contemporary space, and say, Look at the symbolism that is packed into this.
Once youve designed your mission patch, there is a projector system that captures that image from your page. It then projects it onto a large wall at the back of the museum.
He adds:
One of my favourite spots is where we fast-forward 50, 60, 70 years into the future, and take you into a futuristic lunar habitat. We invite you to sit on what is essentially a cosmic city council, to answer big questions about the ownership of the Moon. For instance, are we all sharing it? Are we projecting colonialism onto the surface of the Moon? How is this going to work? Middle schoolers have a lot to say about that.
Then there are questions about who makes the rules of the road; and whether we set up democratic systems on the moon for settlements, or if we follow the military model that we have traditionally followed for space exploration, where a commander is appointed. All these questions are largely hypothetical right now. Yet, they will become entirely practical during the lifetimes of the kids who are visiting us at Moonshot Museum. These kids might well become space lawyers or policymakers.
We are going to need policymakers who are familiar with the 21st-century space industry economy. People who can make smart decisions about what comes next.
In this zone, visitors will vote on issues. This will create a lunar charter that consists of the decisions their group has made.
Then, if youre visiting the museum on a weekend, the station works a little bit differently, he says. We will show your votes in the context of the votes of other visitors. So, you can see how the community visiting Moonshot Museum lands, when it comes to these different conversations.
Every visitor to Moonshot Museum has the opportunityto send a little piece of themselves up to the surface of the Moon. This is through an initiative called Hope Moonshot, devised in partnership with Penn State University, Moore explains:
We are going to have a station where you write a message, and draw a picture. We capture a digital image of that message and picture and load it onto an SD card. Then, that SD card hitches a ride on one of the Astrobotic landers up to the surface of the Moon. That data that you have given us is going to live on the surface for a really long time.
The message we are trying to share is, if you can send a little bit of yourself up to the Moon from the north side of Pittsburgh, what cant you do?
About the exhibition design and programming, he says:
What is really exciting about this project for me, as a museum person, is they are one and the same. We have designed an immersive experiential exhibition, primarily fuelled by media and programming, that layers onto the built environment.
The team have been working with partners both in Chicago and Boston to bring the space to life. This includes Luci Creative in Chicago, afull-service experiential design studio. Solomon Group, an award-winningleader inexhibit fabrication, AV systems integration and live event production,provided the AV system design, procurement and integration for the museum. Meanwhile, Richard Lewis Media Group in Boston worked on the media design and Ravenswood Studio was the exhibit fabricator.
The Luci Creative team prototyped and play-tested the experience with over sixty Pittsburgh-area middle school students, building on the insights that came out of this to make the experience more impactful
When it comes to exhibition design, the challenge of a 3000 square foot space is how to create something where people want to come back and see us again and again. Of course, there will be a different spacecraft or a different stage of assembly on a spacecraft each time they visit, which is a changing feature. But what we didnt want to do is build and invest in a space that people come to once a year, and thats enough.
Accordingly, what they have done is to maximise the potential of technology and interactives:
We have built a space thats chock full of nimble and flexible technology. There are interactive pieces that can completely change based on the mission that youre going on, he explains:
If you are a group of middle schoolers coming to us on a field trip, when we first open, youll go on a mission called Lunar Settlers. Your mission objective is to set up the first permanent human settlement on the surface of the Moon. Each challenge you face in those zones I described moves you towards that objective.
However, the vision for this space is for us to build out a catalogue of these mission experiences. So, that when you come next year, you can go on a mission that does not focus on lunar settlement, but on space industry entrepreneurship. Perhaps youre going through the same physical environment, but instead of building a rover, maybe youre building a business model.
Instead of designing a mission patch, maybe youre designing a marketing campaign. Instead of finding a space to settle, maybe youre looking for the landing spot for your companys first lunar lander. Its a whole different lens on lunar exploration and the space industry, in the same physical space. We will be using the screens in the interactive pieces in a fundamentally different way.
This means visitors and teachers will be able to choose from a catalogue of experiences that align with what is being taught in the classroom, and with the next-generation science standards in Pennsylvania, participating in a different experience each time.
I love that I have no idea how were going to be using this space in the future. I know how were using it when we open, and weve got a vision for what comes next. But theres also some creative thinking to be done. We have the flexibility, because of what weve built in this space, and because of the technology weve chosen, to do something wholly different from what were building initially, a few years from now.
The museum will also extend into the digital space:
If theres one thing that weve learned during the pandemic, its that there could very well be an event that happens in the next year, or two, three years, that forces us to pivot our model of public engagement, Moore says.
The reality, too, is that after the pandemic, school districts are not in the same place that they were. So, they dont necessarily have the same funding or access to resources to get out on field trips. When we think about the programming we do at Moonshot Museum, of course, we want people to be in our space. But the reality of what were building is that a lot of it is media based.
Over time, this is something that will be built into digital experiences:
Were already doing a lot of digital outreach programming with schools in our local area. Plus we have also done a lot of summer programme outreach this summer. The vision is to take this model and open it up beyond Pittsburgh. We would love for people to be able to dial in from the UK and jump into an experience here. How exactly we do that remains to be seen.
In terms of how the museum space will evolve over the next years, he adds:
We have built the space to be relevant 5, 6, 7 years from now. Certainly, building our virtual programme portfolio and our digital outreach portfolio goes hand in hand with that.
Moonshot Museum will open to the public on Saturday 15 October. From then, he adds:
From there on, well be open Wednesday through Sundays, five days a week. We also have a relatively low admission price point: $10 for adults and $5 for kids up to age 17. Our hope is that there are not only cool things to see, but there is no financial barrier to visitation for us as well.
Were in the final stretch of installation, and, as with any exhibition project, its all very dusty. Its an exciting point to be in.
Read more here:
Exploring the future of space exploration at Moonshot Museum - blooloop
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on Exploring the future of space exploration at Moonshot Museum – blooloop
Cantwell, Hickenlooper, Lummis, Wicker, Introduce Bill to Thin Out the 900000 Pieces of Orbiting Junk That Endanger the Future of Space Exploration …
Posted: at 10:00 pm
WASHINGTON, D.C.(Maria Cantwell PR) Yesterday, U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, joined U.S. Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) to introduce theOrbital Sustainability (ORBITS) Act, a bipartisan bill to establish a first-of-its-kind demonstration program to reduce the amount of space junk in orbit.
Space junk, or orbital debris, currently poses a threat to human space exploration, scientific research missions, and emerging commercial space services. In March 2021, a large piece of space junk crashed into a farmers property in Grant County, Wash.
There are more than 900,000 pieces of space junk passing over our heads every day, including abandoned Government satellites,said Sen. Cantwell.This bill will jumpstart the technology development needed to remove the most dangerous junk before it knocks out a satellite, crashes into a NASA mission, or falls to the ground and hurts someone. We must continue to explore space, and we have to do it safely.
Our society is reliant on satellites in orbit, yet space junk is a constant, growing threat, said Sen. Hickenlooper, chair of the Commerce Subcommittee on Space and Science.Space debris endangers everything from global communications to advanced weather forecasting to human space exploration.
Space junk is not only dangerous to humans exploring space, it is also a major risk to satellites that people in Wyoming and around the country rely on for basic communication. Im proud to join my colleagues in introducing the ORBITS Act to kickstart the process of removing debris from orbit,said Sen. Lummis, ranking member of the Commerce Subcommittee on Space and Science.
The ORBITS Act would address an important aspect of the complex space debris problem, empowering NASA to partner with the U.S. space industry on active debris removal technology to tackle space junk threats. The United States is the worlds premier spacefaring nation, and I am pleased to join my colleagues in that effort,said Sen. Wicker.
The program will focus on research, development, and demonstration of technologies capable of safely carrying out successful Active Debris Remediation (ADR) missions and jumpstarting a new market for these services. Washington state companies, including Seattle-based satellite servicer Starfish Space,have advocated for the acceleration of space debris removal efforts. Other Washington companies like SpaceX, Amazons Kuiper Systems, and Stoke Space Technologies are also looking for new ways to reduce debris from accumulating in space in the first place or have been threatened by debris. More than 1,300 Washington companies are involved in the aerospace industry.
There are approximately 8,000 metric tons of debris currently in orbit, including at least 900,000 individual pieces of debris that are potentially lethal to satellites. Because of the magnitude of the current debris, simply preventing more debris in the future is not enough.
Full text of the ORBITS Act is availableHERE.
TheOrbital Sustainability (ORBITS) Actcontains the following provisions:
Read this article:
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on Cantwell, Hickenlooper, Lummis, Wicker, Introduce Bill to Thin Out the 900000 Pieces of Orbiting Junk That Endanger the Future of Space Exploration …