Daily Archives: September 14, 2022

CHICAGO Mario Aurelio Navarro, a 49-year-old experienced conductor, was killed in a derailment in a Union Pacific rail yard in El Paso, Texas, Aug. 29. Two cars derailed, crushing Navarro and crashing into a neighboring backyard, rupturing a gas line and forcing the evacuation of 50 residents. Navarros death on the job was entirely preventable. According to a police report, supervisors told him the track was clear, but in fact a derailer had been installed there when work was done on the track earlier.

Brother Navarro is the fourth TD member who has died while in service in 2022, said a statement issued by SMART-TD, the conductors union.

This latest fatality underscores the fact that the rail bosses drive for profits, which has led them to slash crew size and impose unlivable and dangerous schedules, is a crucial question.

These questions are not addressed in the proposed national contract for over 115,000 rail workers organized by a dozen different unions who are facing off against five Class 1 railroads and some 30 local carriers.

The contract for the majority of the unions ran out at the end of 2019. Under the notorious anti-union Railway Labor Act, they entered mandatory talks organized by the National Mediation Board in June 2021. Those talks were unsuccessful and ended June 14 this year, followed by a 30-day cooling off period. Then Joseph Biden imposed a Presidential Emergency Board to draw up proposals, which it issued Aug. 16.

Most of the rail unions, under pressure from workers, have said the recommendations are not acceptable and are continuing negotiations. If a settlement is not reached by Sept. 16, the unions are legally free to strike, and the rail bosses are free to lock out workers.

The board recommended a pay raise of about 24% over five years, some of it retroactive, and the bosses have ballyhooed this as the largest in decades. But most, if not all, of the raise will be eaten up by high inflation and increases in health insurance costs. And the proposal does nothing to address the issues of exhausting work schedules, draconian attendance policies, job cuts and speedup.

Overall, the rail bosses have slashed the workforce by 29% over the last six years, resulting in soaring profits. Now the carriers want to impose engineer-only operations on road trains, and have been cutting yard crews to the bone.

On Aug. 9 CSX unilaterally turned what had been two-person remote control switching crews into one-person jobs in its Selkirk yard near Albany, New York. Since then, Selkirk employees have been harassed, intimidated, and bullied into accomplishing more work with half the crew, Joshua Therrien, chairman of SMART-TD Local 212, wrote in a letter to the federal Surface Transportation Board.

My people were already fatigued and beat down from the employee shortage, Therrien said. Now my members are being forced to work 12 hours vs. 8 hours because the state of the railroad is in shambles. They are being yelled at on the radio, met by management in the field and being harassed for not moving quicker, or doing more, and when they cant find any rule violations, they are flying a drone over our heads 24/7.

The railroad issued a statement saying, CSX strongly refutes the allegations of harassment and intimidation.

Therrien also accused CSX of skimping on routine maintenance in the Selkirk yard. Crews are operating switches that are hard to operate because there are not enough maintenance workers to properly adjust or lubricate them, he wrote. We are walking on road ballast, so that the carrier can save a few pennies on good walking ballast to protect our feet, and we walk around debris. This description rings true for many rail workers across the country.

A track crew of three, the same size as it was decades ago, now is responsible for maintaining five times more trackage from our home base in Lincoln into eastern Iowa, including any yard tracks in between, over 100 miles of track and a number of bridges, Jake Forsgren told the Militant Sept. 3. Forsgren has 11 years as a track worker and welder in Nebraska and is the local chair of Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division Lodge 1320.

Track workers travel long distances, at times hundreds of miles from their home base. Travel allowances paid by the companies were last adjusted in 1996 and meals and lodging have not been raised since 2005.

The Presidential Emergency Board acknowledged the BMWE provided scores of anecdotes of employees who were forced to sleep in cars, skip food or eat nothing but fast food, sleep in substandard hotels with bed bugs and criminal activities taking place on premises, or sleep multiple employees in a room even during the COVID pandemic.

So far, our national negotiating leadership has been unsuccessful getting a contract with railroad companies, Forsgren said. Strike ballots of BMWE members were counted the last week of August, resulting in over 97% for a strike if an agreement isnt reached.

The rail bosses profit drive, crew cuts and resulting worker resignations have led to many delays in servicing customers. Some major capitalist businesses have appealed to the federal government to intervene. In June the Surface Transportation Board issued an emergency service order directing Union Pacific to prioritize corn shipments to Foster Farms, after the poultry giant complained it might have to euthanize millions of chickens for lack of feed.

But the business associations and government agencies, such as the Surface Transportation Board, are united in their opposition to any strike action by rail workers to fight against their conditions. They are counting on Congress to rapidly order a halt to any work stoppage, as it has done many times in the past.

The last national rail strike took place April 17, 1991, after three years of negotiations, mediation and cooling off periods. One of the major issues was the rail bosses drive to cut what were four- or five-person crews to two. The strike showed the tremendous power workers have. Virtually all freight ground to a halt.

By the end of the day, Congress passed legislation ordering the strikers back to work, and the unions complied. The vote was overwhelming and bipartisan, with only five representatives opposed. Most of the bosses concession demands were imposed.

This record proves more clearly than ever that organized labor needs its own political party and not the so-called friends of labor in the Democratic and Republican parties, Joe Swanson, a retired rail worker and the Socialist Workers Party candidate for Congress in Lincoln, told the Militant. The SWP campaign supports the formation of a labor party that would fight for abolition of the Railway Labor Act, which severely limits the right of rail workers to strike.

Rail workers have historically honored the picket lines of other unions when they go on strike, as they did in the 2021 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Local 50G strike at Kelloggs in Omaha, Swanson said. Such acts of solidarity by the entire labor movement can both help and inspire others to stand up and fight. All out in support for the railroad unions in their struggle for a contract and for schedules and crew sizes that protect workers health and welfare. This is in the interest of all workers.

Naomi Craine is a freight conductor and member of SMART-TD.

View original post here:

Build solidarity with rail workers fight! Help strengthen, expand the labor movement! The Militant - The Militant

Reviews & Culture

Jesse Osalvskys new book The Most Absolute Abolition looks at how the Underground Railroad was supported by a network of activists organised in Vigilance Committees, writes Dave Clinch

Tuesday 13 September 2022

In this carefully researched narrative history author Jesse Osalvsky has brought into focus the names and the lives of runaway slaves. They were escaping the prison house of the Southern plantations of the United States. Its a particularly interesting read as its written by and with those who escaped enslavement in pre-Civil War America.

Osalvsky also looks at those who worked with slaves within Vigilance Committees. They listened to and recorded their stories and guided escaped slaves on their dangerous passage to safety away from the reach of slavecatchers on the Underground Railroad.

There was much debate about the methodology of conducting interviews which became an interchange of thought between slaves and interviewers. Critically, it was understood that runaways drove the narrative, with support from those who listened and recorded their experiences.

Several went on to write their own autobiographies, such as fugitive Harriet Jacobs. In Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Harriet wrote about her traumatic experiences. She would become a major figure in the abolitionist movement.

Danger was around every corner for the escaped slavesthey were surrounded by heavy surveillance. Organisations such as the Richmond committee for the Prevention of Absconding and Abducting of Slaves offered considerable rewards for captured fugitives.

It was what scholars describe as a carceral landscape and has a direct link to the present disproportionate number of black people in US jails. It is shocking to learn that those who absconded were described as stealing themselves. The slave was merely a machine who worked harder for a Master.

Women, as philosopher and activist Angela Davis has explained, were classified as breeders not mothers. They could therefore have their children sold away from them like calves and cows.

Former slave Lewis Clarke in his autobiography estimated that some 60 million was robbed from slaves each year. Runaways knew that the capitalist system and the wealth it produced was built on their brutal exploitation.

Reading this history is an immersive experience. There are five chapters that show how the Vigilance Committees helped fugitives from 1835 to 1861 when the Civil War began.

This includes details from individual stories. So I learned that the origins of the committees which were rooted in black resistance and how they operated. Olsavsky examines, for example, how the committees overcame sectarian divides in the 1840s to focus on bringing runaways into the abolitionist movement.

The chapter The Pedagogy of Radical Abolitionism shows how the Vigilance Committee networks assisted in bringing the ideas of Frederick Douglass and William Wells Brown to publication. Runaways were writing about how to overthrow society.

The collaboration between fugitives and Vigilance Committee members created a radicalised body of work that was critical of the American slave economy.

The development of revolutionary ideas about religion, feminism, anti-racism, prison abolition, novel writing, transcendentalism and music is explored in considerable depth. Its interrogated in a chapter entitled All Shall be Thrown Down, which for me demonstrates the possibilities of resistance to the slaveholders by any means necessary.

Olsavskys impressive research draws out differences between abolitionistswho advocated for no further extension to slaveryand those who campaigned for it to be ended immediately. He also shows that where there were differences of philosophy they did not necessarily interfere with the collaboration between the Vigilance Committee networks and the Underground Railroad.

The Vigilance Committees worked with anti-slavery societies. But they went further in advocating armed self-defence and insurrection against the slaveholders. One notable occasion is the raid on Harpers Ferry in 1859 led by John Brown, a revolutionary act which was a contributory factor to the American Civil War.

Its clearly a highly researched narrative that sheds light on the actions and activity of creative individuals, both women and men. Their courage clearly influenced the struggle against the prison house of slavery.

Yet paradoxically they have been sidelined by the powers who benefit from those who continue to exploit labour in the pursuit of profit in the contemporary world. That is why The Most Absolute Abolition is an invaluable resource for understanding the history of revolutionary struggle.

Continue reading here:

The Most Absolute Abolitionnew book explores abolition and lives of escaped slaves - Socialist Worker

In a moment of rising living costs, climate emergencies and infrastructure failures in Jackson, Mississippi, Baltimore and Kentucky, two recent polls from NBC News and Quinnipiac found a majority of Americans viewed threats to democracy as the top election issue going into the 2022 elections. Looking to bolster the Democratic Partys position before the midterms, President Joe Biden sought to address the threat of right-wing authoritarianism (or semi-fascism, as he called it) to representative democracy.

As constitutional law scholar Leah Litman demonstrated in a recent Twitter thread, curtailing voting rights is not the only strategy authoritarians are willing to pursue on their way to political dominance. On August 31, the two Republicans sitting on the four-person Michigan Board of State Canvassers voted against including an abortion rights initiative on the November ballot after canvassers throughout the state acquired more than 750,000 signatures to do so. In other words, two Republicans blocked the will of more than 750,000 Michiganders, presumably not all of them Democrats, in order to undermine reproductive rights. But it is part of two larger trends that are worth understanding: (1) the relationship between the attacks on reproductive freedom & voting rights (2) the GOPs efforts to win by attacking democracy itself, in part by seeking to control all state & local levers of power, Litman rightfully explained on Twitter. The theft of voting and reproductive rights go hand-in-hand.

Yet, the curtailment of democracy runs deeper than the far-right attacks on the electoral process. President Biden and other Democrats continue to resist calls to defund the police. President Biden recently also laid out his Safer America Plan, which seeks to add 100,000 more police. His plan expands policing, which as an institution, along with prisons, has successfully shielded itself from public accountability and calls for radical changes. In addition to acknowledging these aspects of the criminal legal systems undemocratic nature, political scientists Amy Lerman and Vesla Weaver argue that disproportionate contact with police and the legal system suppresses civic participation as police tactics such as stop and frisk tend to engender more estrangement from all government institutions, including those administering elections. And, on the economic front, corporations such as Amazon and Starbucks continue to resist unionization campaigns across the country, blocking democracy at the workplace.

However, media conversations about the decline of, or the threat to, representative democracy obscures how participatory democracy in all areas of life has driven change, or at least opened possibilities for transformation. While the protests against police violence of 2014-2015 and the massive uprisings in 2020 might appear to arise spontaneously after police killings of Black Americans, Black Lives Matter and defund the police, and the protests that carried these demands didnt arise out of nowhere. Calls to defund the Minneapolis Police Department brought the demand into popular discourse after the murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. We would not have been ready that summer had we not been organizing and educating ourselves for years prior, Miski Noor and Kandace Montgomery of Minneapoliss Black Visions wrote in the Foreword to No More Police: A Case for Abolition.

In another moment illustrating the importance of grassroots democracy, the campaign to abolish student debt led by the debtors union, the Debt Collective, won a national victory when they pushed Biden to abolish up to $20,000 in college debt for borrowers. They won this campaign after years of holding meetings, building their membership and organizing protests, including a national student debt strike with students who were defrauded by for-profit colleges, as well as joining progressives Bernie Sanders and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez to push for mass student debt cancellation and free college.

In turn, the Debt Collectives roots rest in the Occupy Movement, which not only popularized calling the ultra-wealthy the 1% while declaring itself to be the 99%, but also inspired participants to devote themselves to taking back control over privatized and public spaces by developing and practicing forms of direct democracy through popular assemblies. The Debt Collective, as well as the Movement for Black Lives, demonstrate the ways in which democratic social movements can encourage people to engage in what Robin D.G. Kelley calls freedom dreaming, or imagining and organizing for a more liberatory future, and to lay the foundation for future movement victories. Participatory democracy encourages us to adopt a long-term perspective in the quest for transformation.

Mainstream conversations about the threat to democracy also miss how contemporary movements flow from a larger tradition of radical democracy that stretches from the abolitionists of the 19th century and through communist and labor organizing of the 1930s to the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and the Students for a Democratic Society and their practices of participatory democracy during the 1960s. It is not a coincidence that some participants involved in the Movement for Black Lives in the last decade, such as Alicia Garza, Mariame Kaba and Andrea Ritchie, have drawn lessons from civil rights organizer Ella Baker and point to her commitment to guiding activists in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee as a source of inspiration. And the grassroots participatory democratic politics of the 1960s and today provide us three key lessons of transformative organizing: engage in the radical questioning of society, to get to the root of the problem; practice democracy among ourselves, to allow ourselves to experiment with changing institutions and our environments; and allow ourselves to make mistakes.

Ultimately, demands from workers to unionize, as well as efforts to engage in participatory budgeting, and to address the climate crisis, also represent calls for, at the very least, popular control over how our resources are allocated.

Some anti-police-violence activists and organizations such as Action St. Louis have turned to participatory budgeting as a strategy not just to divert money away from law enforcement, but also to further democratize decision-making around public spending. This process ignited a successful campaign to close a local jail known as the Workhouse, an institution that functioned as a debtors prison.

Meanwhile, calls to defund the police, cut defense spending and abolish college debt in the context of the larger effort to transform policing, law enforcement and higher education highlight the meaning of what W.E.B. DuBois called abolition-democracy. DuBoiss illustration of abolition-democracy in his study of Reconstruction entailed not just the dismantling of oppressive institutions but also replacing them with ones that could support a more just and free society.

It is necessary to defeat right-wing extremist authoritarianism wherever and whenever it rears its head, whether in streets in protest, or at the ballot box. However, it is necessary for us to remember that democracy cannot be reduced to participating in elections. For us to build a truly democratic society grounded in economic, racial, climate, reproductive, gender, disability and restorative justice, we must engage in more radical education, organizing and protest. We must support groups working at the front lines of these struggles, such as the Kentucky groups EKY Mutual Aid and Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky, which have been extending relief to flood victims. Cooperation Jackson (in Jackson, Mississippi) has also exemplified radical grassroots organizing. In response to the citys water crisis, the organization is leading a mutual aid campaign for Jackson residents and calling for Justice4Jackson, which demands that the federal and state government completely overhaul and modernize the citys water filtration and delivery systems in an environmentally sustainable manner. We will not defeat authoritarianism with neoliberal technocracy. Grassroots organizing and power is the way we will transform public safety, abolish debt, build workers power and revolutionize work, and stem the climate crisis.

Here is the original post:

Democracy Cant Be Reduced to Voting in 2022 We Must Build the Future We Want - Truthout

IN BRIEF While the Minister of Economy and Finance Bruno Le Maire confirmed the forthcoming abolition of the contribution on the added value of companies (CVAE), Christophe Ferrari shows the niche and denounces political and financial nonsense . For the president of the Metropolis of Grenoble, the measure will be harmful to companies and could weigh heavily in the coffers of the Metro.

The abolition of the CVAE is political and financial nonsense . This is how Christophe Ferrari comments on the announcement by Bruno Le Maire, Minister of the Economy and Finance, of the abolition of the contribution on the added value of companies, spread over two years. An announcement that comes as no surprise, since the Prime Minister had already mentioned it in her general policy speech.

Problem ? The CVAE is a local tax, which benefits in particular the regional councils (up to 50%), but also the departmental councils, the municipalities and the intermunicipalities. Unsurprisingly, the president of Grenoble-Alpes Mtropole (also mayor of Pont-de-Claix) Christophe Ferrari sees, therefore, with a very bad eye this announcement.

Political nonsense? This amounts to thinking that local authorities do not work with companies in their territories. , castigates the chosen one. For who investments made by local authorities [] are also essential elements of the well-being, the attractiveness and the dynamism of our territories and therefore of the proper functioning of our companies .

Removing the CVAE is not encouraging the hosting of economic activities, it is choosing to slow down the reindustrialization of our country , therefore denounces Christophe Ferrari. Taking the example of land, which is essential for businesses but valuable for communities, and which risks tomorrow not being oriented towards the needs of companies if the CVAE is abolished .

In addition, the president of the Mtropole de Grenoble further indicates, the CVAE comes under a taxation adapted to the turnover of companies . We are therefore not talking about a tax that would weaken artisans or local businesses. , is indignant the chosen one. For whom, on the contrary, the CVAE protects small businesses .

As for the financial nonsense, this is based on the compensation provided by the State which already does not run on gold. For the Mtropole alone, revenue linked to the CVAE represents 40 million euros per year. That is the equivalent of the investments planned by the Mtropole in sport and culture by 2026. And the chosen one concludes by asking himself: What will we do tomorrow if the State were to stop compensating these sums?.

Excerpt from:

Christophe Ferrari denounces the announced abolition of the CVAE - US Sports - US Sports -

By PTI

MUMBAI:Members of a tribal community in Nashik facing livelihood crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic "handed over" their children to goatherds for up to Rs 10,000 a year to work as labourers, police said on Sunday.

The matter came to light after an 11-year-old girl working as a labourer died recently, they said, adding that a case of murder has been registered in this connection.

The Nashik rural police have so far rescued eight such children from neighbouring Ahmednagar in Maharashtra. Two persons have been arrested in connection with the murder case and three others held under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act-1976, a senior official said.

On August 27, the girl was found lying unconscious outside a tribal community camp where 12 families were staying in temporary sheds on a roadside at Ubade village in the Ghoti area on Sinnar road, he said.

Somebody had left the girl outside the camp, he said. The police and the girl's relatives later rushed her to a hospital where she died during treatment on September 3, he said.

During the enquiry, the police came to know the girl and her 10-year-old brother were handed over to goatherds in Ahmednagar, the official said. The girl used to come to meet her parents once or twice a year.

She had been unconscious since August 21 and was admitted to hospitals in Ahmednagar and Pune apparently after a snakebite and finally sent to her parents, he said.

Nashik rural Superintendent of Police Sachin Patil took serious cognisance of the issue and asked his team to conduct a detailed investigation into it. The police found that at least 11 such children, aged 6 to 15, were given by their family members to goatherds in Ahmednagar, the official said.

After the girl was found unconscious, the Ghoti police initially registered an FIR against unidentified persons under Indian Penal Code Section 307 (attempt to murder).

Later, it was converted to a case of murder, the official said, adding that two persons were arrested. The final cause of the death was awaited, he said.

"We are waiting for a medical opinion in the case, but any kind of sexual assault has been ruled out," a police official said on condition of anonymity. After this incident, the Nashik police with the help of their Ahmednagar counterparts have so far rescued eight minor children from goatherds, another official said.

An investigation revealed parents of these children gave them to goatherds through agents for getting up to 10,000 a year and a goat/sheep in return, the official said. The children were deployed for guarding sheep and goats, he said.

Asked about children being used for such jobs, the official said if an adult is kept the work, he would have to be paid Rs 3,000 to Rs 5,000 per month besides food and accommodation. But, the logistics for children would be comparatively less and they would require a small place to stay, he said.

The official said while enquiring with the parents of such children, they came to know these people were jobless due to the COVID-19 pandemic and did not have adequate food.

Before the pandemic, they used to go to brick kilns and do odd jobs at sugarcane farms. "But, during the pandemic they did not find jobs to sustain their livelihood and handed over their children to goatherds," he said.

Police are searching for the agents involved in such activities and goatherds who used the minors as labourers, he said. The official said they are also searching for some more children and collecting data about such minors to rescue them with the help of NGOs, he said.

So far, two separate offences under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act have been registered in this connection at Sangamner in Ahmednagar, the official said.

Go here to see the original:

Child labour: Nashik tribals struggle to survive, give kids to goatherds for Rs 10K - The New Indian Express

MADISON, WI -- From September 15 - October 15, 2022, Madison Public Library is accepting applications for the Library Takeover program.

Teams of 3-4 people can apply to participate in the program, which includes a 4-session course on event planning and culminates in a finished and fully-funded program at the library in the spring of 2023. The library will choose three teams to participate for 2022-2023 and will provide $2,000 for each team to use in planning their event. Each individual team member will also receive a $400 stipend and a certificate of completion from Madison Public Library. No previous event-planning experience is necessary - all thats needed is a great idea for community engagement!

We are looking for inclusive ideas and events from people in Madison who do not typically have access to resources for large community events, namely individuals not already connected to a non-profit, business or educational institution, said Community Engagement Librarian Kristina Gmez. We are especially looking for events that connect people, make an impact and reflect Madisons diverse communities.

Each team that is selected to create a program will be paired with a mentor from the community. This years mentors are Sarah Akawa, Rob Dz, and T.S. Banks. Mentors help guide their team through a crash course on event planning, share their local contacts and connections, and lend their expertise to the process. One of the participants in the Library Takeover program from last year, who helped host the Muslim Mental Health Matters events, had this to say:

"I was always very nervous about planning events because it was so much workthe Library Takeover made it doable to put together an event that otherwise we would never have done. Now I understand what it takes to make a successful event, and I feel confident we can continue to help out our community."

Library Takeover began in 2017 as a way to do community programming differently. Last years teams hosted events focusing on Thrival Tools and Indigenous Brilliance, essential workers, and American muslims in Madison. Over 350 people attended the four events that took place in Spring 2022. Madison Public Library provided the space, time, and resources for these teams to host their own events, which help set the stage for future library programming that reflects all of Madison.

Applications are available online and will be accepted throughout the 30-day submission period, with a closing date of October 15, 2022. Group learning bootcamps will be hosted by Central Library staff (201 W Mifflin) on Tuesday nights, November 15, 22 and December 6, 13 from 6-7:30 p.m. Two of the bootcamps will be in-person and two will be held online.

Library Takeover is funded in part by Madison Public Library Foundation. Visit madpl.org/library-takeover to learn more or submit an application.

About the Mentors:Sarah Akawa: Sarah Akawa is an advocate for queer nightlife and inclusive spaces. Akawa is a DJ and producer operating under the name Saint Saunter, and has put extensive effort into booking queer-focused dance parties, live music events, and art shows at venues around town. In 2019, Akawa runs the multi-genre summer festival series Hot Summer Gays and runs Queer IRL, a monthly queer dance party.T.S. Banks: T.S. Banks is the author of Call Me ill, Left, and SPLIT is a Black & QTDisabled, non-binary teaching artist, poet, and playwright from Madison, WI. He is the founder of Loud N UnChained Theater Co. Their work addresses visioning for Black Liberation, a critique of the medical system, radical care + access, madness, QT Liberation, disability justice, abolition and cross-movement solidarity.Rob Dz: Rob Dz is a Madison-based Hip Hop artist and activist. He currently works as the Media Projects Bubblerarian at the Madison Public Library. He is the creator of the Mad Lit event series on the 100 block of State Street that focuses on creating a more inclusive downtown by bringing in music, art and businesses of color throughout the summer.. One of his songs is the inspiration for the title of American Family Insurances book, Lets Talk About It, which memorializes the mural art downtown following the civil unrest of 2020.

About Madison Public LibraryMadison Public Librarys tradition of promoting education, literacy and community involvement has enriched the City of Madison for more than 140 years. Visit the library online at http://www.madisonpubliclibrary.org, madisonpubliclibrary on Facebook, @madisonlibrary on Twitter, or @madisonpubliclibrary on Instagram.

Read more:

Library Takeover Returns: Submit Your Application! | City of Madison - City of Madison, Wisconsin

In this Dec. 19, 2019 file photo, Britain's Queen Elizabeth and Prince Charles arrive for the State Opening of Parliament in London. Charles, the oldest person to ever assume the British throne, became king on Thursday Sept. 8, 2022, following the death of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II. | Toby Melville / Pool via AP

Britains Communist Party is not mincing any words when it comes to its published reaction to the death of Queen Elizabeth II. The party has called for ending the monarchy altogether and dissolving the ability of any of its family members from exercising the powers the monarchy currently has.

In a statement, as Elizabeths body was on display in Edinburgh, Scotland, the Communists declared, Elizabeth Windsor has died leaving the kingdom she ruled over poorer, with greater disparities in wealth and income, obscene profiteering and tax evasion, and with its aggressive imperialist activities in full flow, including a proxy war in Europe.

The statement went on to condemn not just the rule of Elizabeth II but the entire history of the British monarchy:

The failures of the monarchy as an institution are knitted into its very fabric, and it has played a role in empire and class rule and as an active agent of the capitalist class for centuries. For this reason, it is an obstacle to progress and a society of equals, where every citizen is valued and has the opportunity to play an active role in building communities and society.

That part of the partys statement was strikingly similar to the words and intent of the original U.S. Declaration of Independence in 1776, which pointed out how the British monarch at that time was a hindrance to the pursuit of happiness and a decent human life in the former colonies.

The news media in both Britain and the U.S. has spoken constantly, since Elizabeths death, about the royal duties Elizabeth allegedly performed as Britains sovereign and how Charles III, the new sovereign, will continue to do so. The Communist Party of Britains program says that, to the contrary, popular sovereignty means the sovereignty of the people and their elected representatives in parliaments, governments, and mass movements.

This requires, the party says, the abolition of all powers and institutions relating to the monarchy, including such posts as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, together with the royal prerogative, the Privy Council, and similarly unaccountable offices of state.

Many mistakenly believed that the calls by the Communists for the abolition of the crown are over the top since the British monarchy is nothing more than a meaningless ceremonial institution engaging in processions and gatherings where people dress up in medieval and Victorian costumes and stage changing of the guards for tourists in London. The propaganda line put forward, after Elizabeths death, is that the monarchy pulls people together and makes them feel good during tough and turbulent times. We have even heard pundits say that if we had something like it in America the nation would not be facing the divisive times we now are dealing with.

Parliament suspended

The idea that the monarch is harmless and doesnt threaten democracy is as false as an idea can be. In Britain already, the death of Elizabeth has been used to suspend Parliament, the elected representatives of the people, for at least ten days.

The suspension comes just as that body was to vote on critical labor rights issues and measures to stop cuts in health care and stem the effects of double-digit inflation and the energy crisis. The suspension is also designed to head off debate on whether the country should continue pouring billions of pounds into the military budget to fight a proxy war in Ukraine.

We are witnessing the powerful collaboration of the monarchy with the ruling Conservative Tories to carry out right-wing domestic policy and the continuation of imperialist policy overseas. For its service to capitalism and imperialism, the monarchy has continued to be funded with incredible amounts of money and wealth. Someone, and it was always the British workers and workers overseas, had to pay for the millions of pounds worth of personal automobiles Elizbeth enjoyed taking out for a spin whenever she could.

All through Elizabeths reign, stories about the monarchy, combined with tales of the exploits of heroic members of the royal family, were used to deflect attention from political problems and the horrendous, often murderous, foreign interventions carried out by Britain. The ruling class always preferred feel good stories about Elizabeth II to the decidedly unpleasant stories about what Britain was doing to its people at home and colonial subjects overseas.

It is clear that the mainstream media, in service of the powers that be in both Britain and the U.S., see support for the British monarchy as an important tool in their arsenal of weapons to control the thinking of working-class people and their allies in both countries.

They have gone all out to use stories about the alleged personal qualities displayed by Elizabeth II to cover up the maneuvering and crimes carried out by the British monarchy and ruling political circles during the 70 years of her reign.

An objective examination of what has been done in the service of British capitalism and imperialism while she sat on the throne yields evidence of high crimes against humanity. In no way can it be said that the Queen was a bystander observing crimes she would have wished never to have happened, as some are trying to say.

In every major criminal colonial intervention since Elizabeth was crowned in 1952, she is proven to have played a major part.

Britains friendship with the Shah of Iran prior to and following a British-backed coup in 1953 shows the way the monarchy, and specifically Elizabeth, worked to lend legitimacy to a policy of neocolonialism that actually yielded more profits for British capitalists than they had earned during the openly colonial era that preceded the neocolonial period.

Backed by brutal police

Shah Pahlavi ruled with the backing of the notoriously brutal secret police in Iran. He was put into power by the British, with U.S. help, because the elected prime minister had nationalized the countrys oil industry.

The oil industry in Iran was one of the most profitable of Britains business holdings in the Middle East. While Britain, in service of its oil companies, was seizing control of Iranian oil with the help of the U.S., Elizabeth was busy making speeches about the unending friendship of the U.S. and Britain. Nothing like working with a good friend to bilk the Iranian people and fill the royal coffers.

Once the Shah took over, oil profits flowed faster than ever into Britain. It was Queen Elizabeth II, revered today by the media as a friend of democracy, who received the Shah as an official guest in 1959. She also made a celebratory state visit to Iran as the Shahs guest in 1961. During that visit, she never went to the prisons that housed tens of thousands of tortured victims of the Shah, whose rule she was celebrating.

She visited or invited to Britain royalty from places like Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, and the Gulf emirates. Those visits and invitations, however, did little to prevent many of those fellow monarchs with whom Elizabeth wined and dined from being overthrown. The people of those countries had ideas quite different from the ideas of Elizabeth when it came to the question of who should be ruling them.

In the case of Libya, King Idris, formerly the leader of the Senussi tribe and Emir of Cyrenaica, was awarded the Grand Cross of the British Empire for his support in the defeat of German and Italian forces in North Africa during World War II.

The Queens cousin Earl Mountbatten (who oversaw the precipitous and disastrous partition of India in 1947) was a close friend of Idris and used to visit him in Libya and stay at his royal palace.

In return, Idris supported Britain and France during the attack on Egypt in 1956 and provided the U.S. with a major airbase near Tripoli, home to 4,600 U.S. personnel. All of this was lost in Muammar Gadhafis coup of 1969.

The policy of installing and supporting autocratic monarchs across the Middle East disproves any claims made today that the British crown, under Elizabeth, somehow became a friend of democracy.

Another powerful contribution Elizabeth made to the ruling class in Britain and overseas was her strong and effective endorsement of the idea of diplomacy carried out by a tiny group of ruling class supporters rather than any type of broader group representing the interests of workers and their allies.

As head of the British royal family, she played an essential role in maintaining good relations with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman.

The British ruling class and the U.S. ruling class love this approach, wanting never to allow trade unions or any other mass organizations to get anywhere near the setting of foreign policy that would work for the people rather than for themselves.

Poured money into royal coffers

In exchange for this support by Elizabeth II, the regimes of the Middle East monarchies poured billions of dollars into the British economy, including huge invisible amounts into the royal coffers, enabling the alleged pro-democracy monarch to accumulate unprecedented amounts of luxury properties in Britain and around the world.

In an article this week in Morning Star, Britains socialist daily newspaper, there was a report about the Queens love of horses. She shared that love with her pal, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, the Emir of Dubai, whose notorious kidnapping of two of his own daughters, one carried out in the middle of the English countryside in 2000, did nothing to dent the Queens relationship with the tyrant.

Despite a recent court case confirming the kidnappings, he appears untroubled by any threat of arrest for what are serious crimes.

It needs to be mentioned that the Queen, or now the King, have other constitutional roles that are actually not limited in any way, leaving open dangerous possibilities.

Queen Elizabeth II and now King Charles III, is the actual, not just the ceremonial, commander-in-chief of the British armed forces, to which all soldiers swear an oath of loyalty before deployment to Afghanistan, Iraq, or anywhere else. Those wars have seen Britain join the U.S. in carrying out battles that have left many tens of thousands of people dead.

A speech given by Elizabeth II in 2009 perversely compared this part of her duties with the maintenance of world peace. Speaking to British troops, she said, Wherever you are deployed in the world, you should be assured that I and the whole nation are deeply thankful for the part you play in helping to maintain peace around the globe.

The mainstream media in Britain brags that her grandson Prince Harry is only the latest royal who served during a war in which British forces have been accused of systematic war crimes, with the deaths of hundreds of civilians in night raids.

The BBC has conducted investigations that have exposed the role of British troops in wonton murder of civilians and their detailed cover-ups of the crimes. All this is part of keeping the peace, if you believe Elizabeth II.

The blatant royal support for post-colonial imperialism has already been frequently part of the routine for Charles III, who is now being touted as a progressive environmentalist. Charles has visited the Gulf region many times, endorsing and enabling the continued sale of British weapons to the Saudi regime in its bloody war in Yemen that has seen tens of thousands killed in air strikes. Charles has given blessing and support to the sale and export of British weapons resulting in tens of thousands of deaths both here and in Ukraine.

Elizabeth was more than a monarch who endorsed or carried out imperialist crimes. Until well into the 1970s she watched the unfolding of Operation Legacy, a systematic effort to erase the history of colonial crimes carried out by Britain.

Operation Legacy important to Britain

Operation Legacy was particularly important to Britain in Kenya, after that East African country won its independence.

The British government, under Elizabeths rule, set up a network of concentration camps in Kenya where hundreds of thousands had died for the crime of supporting freedom from British rule. The Mau Mau wars saw the rounding up of many thousands who fought for independence. People in the British concentration camps were subject to horrific tortures before they were finally murdered.

Under Elizabeth, a major effort was then made to destroy the records of the crimes of the British monarchy during her reign as sovereign of Kenya.

The British government, defeated in court, moved to settle the Mau Mau case. On June 6, 2013, the foreign secretary, William Hague, announced in Parliament an unprecedented agreement to compensate 5,228 Kenyans who were tortured and abused during the insurrection. Each would receive about 3,800 ($4,400 USD).

The British government recognizes that Kenyans were subject to torture and other forms of ill-treatment at the hands of the colonial administration, Hague said. Britain sincerely regrets that these abuses took place. The admission and settlement, although inadequate, marked the first time Britain had admitted to carrying out torture anywhere in its former empire.

In Jamaica and elsewhere in the Caribbean, demands are increasing today that the British monarchy do more than just apologize for its legacy of support for slavery in that country for hundreds of years.

A survey in August showed that 60% of Jamaicans want to get rid of the monarchy and believe the U.K. should pay reparations for the damages caused by slavery.

The majority of the population of Jamaica are descended from slaves, stolen from Africa by the ancestors of the new king, Charles III. Muta Baruka, an activist for justice in Jamaica, is one such descendant whose family originated in what is now Ghana.

He said on MSNBC Sunday that for 70 years Elizabeth was the monarch, and during those years she presided over continuing atrocities in Africa and never apologized to anyone. We have to continue the struggle for an apology but most important to follow that with reparations.

The reasonable amount of reparations for the crimes of slavery and their effect on nations all across the Caribbean is too enormous to even calculate, according to most historians. It would amount to trillions of dollars when it comes to compensating the people of the countries of the Caribbean, according to Baruka.

Carolyn Harris, a historian of the British monarchy, says there is a real grappling with this problem by the monarchy, specifically Charles III, who she claimed, has listened to Native Canadians when he visited that country recently.

She offers no evidence, however, of any consideration by Charles of an official apology or reparations by a monarch that has arguably accumulated enormous wealth as a result of slavery and other repressive measures practiced by Britain in the colonies in the past and in Commonwealth countries today.

So stop the round-the-clock reports of how the world is mourning the dead monarch and getting ready for the new one. Too much important stuff is happening around the world, not the least of which is the need to stop horrific wars and defeat fascists in the U.S. And yes, the British government must apologize and begin reparations. And then waste no time in getting rid of the monarchy altogether. That will be the best way to remember Elizabeth Windsor.

As with all op-eds published by Peoples World, this article reflects the opinions of its author.

The Morning Star contributed material to this article.

Read the rest here:

Do Britain and the world really need a king? - People's World