Daily Archives: July 27, 2022

Between Grace and Nature – The American Conservative

Posted: July 27, 2022 at 11:56 am

Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.

If the Christian is to be consistent, he cannot say that freedom is absolute, for the consequences of that are atheism. If the liberal is to be consistent, he must say that mans essence is freedom or else he gives up his position.

Many rich men dabble in philosophy, once their wealth is of the sort that largely takes care of itself. But a few students of philosophy have even become rich, in part thanks to their love of wisdom. Thales of Miletus anticipated a bumper crop of olives when others expected a bad harvest, and so leased the citys presses as a monopolist. Before he broke the Bank of England, George Soros studied under Karl Popper at the London School of Economics. And Peter Thiel has credited the mimetic thought of his teacher Ren Girard with prompting him to place a very profitable bet on Facebook.

Thiel has continued his studies of philosophy, at the University of Chicago, teaching courses at Stanford, and supporting various intellectual programs besides his fellowships for college dropouts. The incisive British essayist Mary Harringtona contributing editor at UnHerd and probably the good feminist to TAC readers andthat transphobe to otherswas recently on faculty with Thiel for a seminar in Palo Alto put on by the Zephyr Institute. She sat down with Thiel for an on-the-record chat. The conversation was wide ranging and reviewed many now classic observations from the Zero to One author. I encourage you to read all of Harringtons suggestive reflections on it, but one dichotomy or theme in particular stood out to me: what, when we consider the question of technology, is the relationship between nature and grace?

After raising the feardistilled in the 1930s and 40s by figures like Aldous Huxley, C.S. Lewis, and Romano Guardinithat technology has and will continue to outstrip nature, in particular human nature, Harrington writes of Thiel:

He seems to view this as a largely academic question, and not really in keeping with his understanding of Christian civilisation as fundamentally oriented toward the future. I think of Christianity as deeply historical. Some sense of a certain type of progress of history is a deep part of Christianity. And from this perspective, the notion that there exists an unchanging human nature doesnt really fit with the Christian outlook, but belongs as he puts it more in the classical than the Christian tradition.

The word nature does not occur once in the Old Testament, he tells me, while the concept of nature as something thats eternal and unchanging isnt a Christian one either. It seems to me that the Christian concepts are more things like grace or original sin. From this perspective, Thiel argues, the problem with transhumanism isnt that it seeks to remake humanity, but that it isnt ambitious enough in this regard: the Christian critique of transhumanism should be that its not radical enough, because its only seeking to transform our bodies and not our souls. It appears, in other words, that while Thiel is unflinchingly realistic about whats immediately achievable, he doesnt see any given or self-evident limits to what we could set our sights on.

The observation that the philosophers account of naturecosmos as an indivisible whole with no starting point or destinationwas not derived from scripture is a provocative, under-discussed one, and obviously correct. Whether as a self-sustaining chain of fixed natures or being in endless flux, nature in this sense of Western reason is an object of human subjectivity opposed to revelation. But there appears to me to be a missing Christian concept here, in addition to grace or original sin, from both the Old and New Testaments, namely that of creation. As Paul writes in Romans, For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now. And in this sense of creation much of the Christian skepticism for what is called transhumanism retains all its force, for while recognizing the becoming implied in a linear sense of history, its teleology of beginning and final judgment retains the possibility of essences: acorns becoming oak trees and human beings becoming more fully human in new creation.

Thiel has almost certainly thought through all of this, and I expect it was covered in discussion at the seminar, but in his conversation with Harrington, and in much of his public writing, he brings the conversation away from postmillenial anticipation back down to earth. Indeed, in an oblique response to this line of objection, he told her, And maybe science and technology arent that much, but I would say if we stop believing in the teleology of science and technology its not that we go back to some Thomistic or medieval concept of teleology. We become fully epicurean. In a historical moment past faith in grace perfecting nature, we are perhaps left as a post-Christian culture with a choice between the secularized providence of hard technology and the profound pessimism of eternal passing away.

Up to this conversation, perhaps the most distilled account of Thiels thoughts on our present technological malaise was a 2015 essay by the futurist for First Things, entitled Against Edenism. The problem, as he sees it, in brief: Technology means doing more with less. In the absence of technological progress, we end up with a zero-sum world, in which there must be a loser for every winner. It is not clear whether a capitalistic economic system could function without growth; and it is unlikely that a representative democracy, which requires the give-and-take of win-win compromise, would continue to function. That is to say, we do not live in a time when technological progress as such has overcome the bounds of human control, but rather when the digitalthe transcending of time and space by manipulation and recording of informationhas outstripped all material developments; the world of atoms and physical engineering stalled somewhere in the 1970s. The promise of a post-scarcity world remains unkept.

Subscribe Today Get weekly emails in your inbox

And this is an insight that can be retained with as orthodox a theology of creation as I can claim (whatever that is). For its focus is the act of dominion mandated to humanity after original sin, and the sweat of our brow, far before it questions whether we must indeed unto dust return. In the twentieth-century tradition of political theology, Thiel makes a grace of growth, but surely there is a grace in growth if we understand it to be the human beings capacity to join Goda city-builderas a subcreator, a namer of animals.

Indeed, in our current-day fight between degrowth proponents demanding that Americans, for the sake of nature, learn to live degraded lives and men like Thiel, who remain hopeful that human ingenuity and spirit can construct a better use of the material weve been given, I am reminded of nothing as much as Christs parable of the talents:

For the kingdom of heaven is like a man traveling to a far country, who called his own servants and delivered his goods to them. And to one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one, to each according to his own ability; and immediately he went on a journey. Then he who had received the five talents went and traded with them, and made another five talents. And likewise he who had received two gained two more also. But he who had received one went and dug in the ground, and hid his lords money. After a long time the lord of those servants came and settled accounts with them.

So he who had received five talents came and brought five other talents, saying, "Lord, you delivered to me five talents; look, I have gained five more talents besides them." His lord said to him, "Well done, good and faithful servant; you were faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord." He also who had received two talents came and said, "Lord, you delivered to me two talents; look, I have gained two more talents besides them." His lord said to him, "Well done, good and faithful servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord."

Then he who had received the one talent came and said, "Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed. And I was afraid, and went and hid your talent in the ground. Look, there you have what is yours."

But his lord answered and said to him, "You wicked and lazy servant, you knew that I reap where I have not sown, and gather where I have not scattered seed. So you ought to have deposited my money with the bankers, and at my coming I would have received back my own with interest. So take the talent from him, and give it to him who has ten talents."

"For to everyone who has, more will be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. And cast the unprofitable servant into the outer darkness. There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

Visit link:
Between Grace and Nature - The American Conservative

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Between Grace and Nature – The American Conservative

Religious and spiritual practices may improve mental health in older adults – 2 Minute Medicine

Posted: at 11:56 am

1. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, high religious and spiritual (RS) practices were negatively associated with the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression.

2. Furthermore, there was a positive association between RS practices and life satisfaction, meaning in life, social relations, and psychological well-being.

Evidence Rating Level: 1 (Excellent)

It is expected that one in five seniors will experience some form of mental illness (e.g. depression, anxiety) late in life. An increasing number of studies support the finding that involvement in RS activities enhance mental health status; however, a specific pooled analysis of reviews on the older population is still needed. As a result, the objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was to investigate the association between RS and the prevalence, severity, and incidence of mental health conditions in older adults.

Of 44 180 identified studies, 62 were included in the final meta-analysis from inception to July 2021. Studies that evaluated the association between RS and mental health in people aged >60 years old were included. Studies were excluded if they compared the prevalence of mental health parameters among different religious affiliations without a comparison to no religious identification or atheism. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). A random effects model and sensitivity analysis was performed.

Results demonstrated that high religious and spiritual (RS) practices were negatively associated with the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. Furthermore, there was a positive association between RS practices and life satisfaction, meaning in life, social relations, and psychological well-being. However, the present study was limited by the inclusion of mostly cross-sectional studies, thereby limiting inferences of causality. Nonetheles, the studys results provide further support for the utility of RS in enhancing the mental health of older adults.

Click to read the study in Frontiers in Medicine

Image: PD

2022 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by 2 Minute Medicine, Inc.

The rest is here:
Religious and spiritual practices may improve mental health in older adults - 2 Minute Medicine

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Religious and spiritual practices may improve mental health in older adults – 2 Minute Medicine

If You Meet Richard Dawkins On The Road… – Daily Kos

Posted: at 11:56 am

The Garden of Earthly Delights

AMERICAN NEWSApr 21, 2021 8:47 PM EST

AHA strips Richard Dawkins of Humanist of the Year award after famed author criticizes transgenderism

It was also not my intent to ally in any way with Republican bigots in US now exploiting this issue."

Too late.

American Humanist Association Board Statement Withdrawing Honor from Richard Dawkins

He isalso a bigot.Who would ever suggest such a thing?! (Smug Arrogant Look) Im not going to post his vile, bigoted remarks here. Read them for yourself.

KPFA cancels Richard Dawkins speech because of his tweets about Islam

Well of course he does. Bigots are usually the last people to find out they are bigots.

Ive beensaying this in the last 2 or 3 diaries. I wasexcoriatied and subjected to abusefrom some ignorant individuals,not everyone, just those who believe Dawkins is a legitimate scientist. I get the sense themajority of the commenters here might preferto keep their personal beliefs to themselves, and no wonder, if the vile rancor I was subjected to is any metric, after being beaten down and ridiculed for merely stating an actual fact:Atheism is just another unsubstantiated belief, nothing more, andIm just an agnostic, who wouldnt?

Im no stranger to it.Ive worked with convicted felons, gangbangers and people with severe substance use disorders.I can handleinternet trolls. Idont believe I must condemn all beliefs of others that I dont share, which is apparently what one must do to be a Good Militant Anti-Theist. Again, Im just an agnostic, and I dont know any more than anyone else. Gnosis. Look it up.This is the agnostic position, just like Socrates. Any view you happen to holdis a belief, unless you can back it up with proof.And I really dont care forbelief. It is a very low level of consciousness. You either know something or you dont. I know I dont know about the existence or non-existence of any such spiritual beliefs - and I have never read Dawkins until now, and now that I have, Im shocked how accurate my take on this crackpot was.And of course the bigot never thinks hes a bigot. Dawkins is nothing more than what I said, a bigot and a quack. Pseudoscience and theories that are controversial and border on Junk science for the ignorant public

When giants likeE.O. Wilson and Steven Jay Gould ripyou a new one, stick a fork in yourself, youredone, as far as serious science is concerned. And E.O. Wilson is Serious Evolution Science and natural selection is a very complex operation: Game theory.

Scientists, plural, dont like him, and they just volunteered their opinions, very unusual for scientists and academics. I certainly have no inhibition about ripping Dawkins as a fraud and a crackpot, and bigot, because he is, and I studied Wilson. And there may be one or two things Dawkins gets right, thats not enough. I agree with the T-shirt but thats nothing new. 40 years ago this was obvious as DNA came into its own and Mitochondrial DNA was first as evidence in a trial. EVIDENCE

I realize this might cause all kinds of pearl-clutching and gnashing of the teeth. What a shame, the truth often hurts. John Maynard Smith never heard of Sayres Law. And he was British.Academic politics makes real politics look like a tea party.This is true, and Ive experienced it many times but academics are loathe to allow the public to see this side of it.

Sayres Law: Academic politics is the most vicious and bitter form of politics, because the stakes are so low.

The late British biologist John Maynard Smith (1920-2004) is famous for applying game theory to the study of natural selection. In 1973 Maynard Smith formalised a central concept in game theory called the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). His ideas, presented in books such as 'Evolution and the Theory of Games', were enormously influential and led to a more rigorous scientific analysis and understanding of interactions between living things.[Listener: Richard Dawkins; date recorded: 1997]TRANSCRIPT: I think that the... the article in the Science of the People... sorry, by the Science for the People, people in, I think, the New York Review of Books, of which I think both [Richard] Lewontin and [Stephen Jay] Gould were signatures of this, was disgraceful, because it didn't... the point is, you can disagree with people, you can disagree with your colleagues as passionately as you like, but you can't go around calling them Fascists and enemies and so on. You have to treat it as an intellectual disagreement. And so I think that the whole of that business, leading up to pouring water over him at the... at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, I think all this was... was ridiculous. But it was predictable.

British scientists don't like Richard Dawkins, finds study that didn't even ask questions about Richard Dawkins

Most British scientists cited in study feel Richard Dawkins' work misrepresents science

Although the researchers did not ask questions about Dawkins, 48 scientists mentioned him during in-depth interviews without prompting, and nearly 80 percent of those scientists believe that he misrepresents science and scientists in his books and public engagements. This group included 23 nonreligious scientists and 15 religious scientists.

Elaine Howard Ecklund, the study's principal investigator and the Herbert S. Autrey Chair in Social Sciences at Rice, said that some scientists, independent of their religious beliefs, do not view Dawkins as a good representative because they believe he conveys "the wrong impression about the borders of scientific inquiry."

"Scientists differ in their view of where such borders rest," said David Johnson, an assistant professor at the University of Nevada in Reno and the paper's lead author. "And they may even view belief in a deity as irrational, but they do not view questions related to the existence of deities or 'the sacred' as within the scope of science."

The investigation into science's public image didn't even ask about the atheist professor, but it got an answer anyway. Very unusual. Academics eschew controversy.

I had never looked into Dawkins before this because I dont do Junk Science.And thats all Dawkins does. Any so called scientist who is that certain of his own bullshit is never right about anything. A charlatan.

Its the publish or die rule, and sometimes all they can publish is bullshit.I never needed him to tell me that Intelligent Design was anything more than what it was:Bullshit. But his response to that Bullshit was more bullshit of his own. And no one cares now anyway.Hitchens was not a clown. His anti-theism was never anything that impressed me, but at least he had an excuse: Hewasan actual journalist, and alcoholic, and a very unhappy man. Punching down is just not something agood person does,and attacking Mother Theresa, what an embarrassment. My opinion of Dawkins was always less than zero. Now Im feeling less kindly about Hitchens, but let the poor man rest in peace. We know hes not in heaven, or hell. The Jews dont even believe in the whackHeaven and Hell the earlyChristian Church sold after Jesus was allegedly crucified.I doubt Jesus did, if he even was a historical person. No one knows. Thats why they call it faith, and belief. You can disagree, youre wrong. So is your God, Dickie Dawkins. Hofstadfter once told the class, when asked about the speed of light: To a photon, space is infinitely thin. Ametaphor, but thats not what Dawkins is doing. Some clowns like the implications but its just a piss poor theory.Gene-centric evolution? Horseshit. Dawkins has no understanding of natural selection, or Darwin.

I expect few here have familiarity with the subject, and sadly, your PhD does not impress. Jordan Petersen has a PhD. So does David Duke. Im just a High School dropout with a GED, likeMike Perry. He did alright for a drop out with a GED. One of the smartest people I know, and I only know smart people, people who can learnand understand the nature of knowledge and understanding.Tolerant people with lots of experience.Lots of experience. Neurodiversity.

The gene-centric view has been opposed by Ernst Mayr, Stephen Jay Gould, David Sloan Wilson, and philosopher Elliott Sober. An alternative, multilevel selection (MLS), has been advocated by E. O. Wilson, David Sloan Wilson, Sober, Richard E. Michod,[31] and Samir Okasha.[31]

Writing in the New York Review of Books, Gould has characterized the gene-centered perspective as confusing book-keeping with causality. Gould views selection as working on many levels, and has called attention to a hierarchical perspective of selection. Gould also called the claims of Selfish Gene "strict adaptationism", "ultra-Darwinism", and "Darwinian fundamentalism", describing them as excessively "reductionist". He saw the theory as leading to a simplistic "algorithmic" theory of evolution, or even to the re-introduction of a teleological principle.[32] Mayr went so far as to say "Dawkins' basic theory of the gene being the object of evolution is totally non-Darwinian."[33]

Gould also addressed the issue of selfish genes in his essay "Caring groups and selfish genes".[34] Gould acknowledged that Dawkins was not imputing conscious action to genes, but simply using a shorthand metaphor commonly found in evolutionary writings. To Gould, the fatal flaw was that "no matter how much power Dawkins wishes to assign to genes, there is one thing that he cannot give them direct visibility to natural selection."[34] Rather, the unit of selection is the phenotype, not the genotype, because it is phenotypes that interact with the environment at the natural-selection interface. So, in Kim Sterelny's summation of Gould's view, "gene differences do not cause evolutionary changes in populations, they register those changes."[35] Richard Dawkins replied to this criticism in a later book, The Extended Phenotype, that Gould confused particulate genetics with particulate embryology, stating that genes do "blend", as far as their effects on developing phenotypes are concerned, but that they do not blend as they replicate and recombine down the generations.[11]

Since Gould's death in 2002, Niles Eldredge has continued with counter-arguments to gene-centered natural selection.[36]Eldredge notes that in Dawkins' book A Devil's Chaplain, which was published just before Eldredge's book, "Richard Dawkins comments on what he sees as the main difference between his position and that of the late Stephen Jay Gould. He concludes that it is his own vision that genes play a causal role in evolution," while Gould (and Eldredge) "sees genes as passive recorders of what worked better than what".[37]

Selecting Richard Dawkins as your personal fountain of truth is a religion with an ideology of intolerance.

Like Dawkins theory

I see no reason to stop exposing this charlatan, and I dont believe in much. Less than any atheist at least, and Im not hostile to any religions, or other ridiculous beliefs. Buddhism isnt religion. Academics can disagree about a great many things, but definitions are the one thing that must be reached by consensus. Definition of terms and classification ARE how science is done. science. Euglena may not be definable, is it an animal or a vegetable? But the rest of it is pretty well defined, or it aint science. Its religion.

See the original post:
If You Meet Richard Dawkins On The Road... - Daily Kos

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on If You Meet Richard Dawkins On The Road… – Daily Kos

Faith: God is the ultimate authority on immortality – easternnewmexiconews.com

Posted: at 11:54 am

As a serious lover of coffee, and as a mortal, I read the headline with interest: People With Daily Intake Of 1.5 to 3.5 Cups Of Coffee Less Likely To Die.

I find this headline problematic on several levels. First, its lousy capitalization. No matter which style manual you use, this title has problems.

But you see the bigger problem, dont you? I suspect that your experience is the same as mine, and Im telling no secrets here. But, in my experience, though I find coffee beneficial on many levels, no matter how much of it anyone drinks, everyone dies100%.

I found the same headline showing up on other news outlets (sometimes with better capitalization), and they added two words, by 30%.

That confuses me even more. Does that mean only 30% of the people who are somewhat serious coffee drinkers might not die? Even the lower percentage would be impressive. Sort of like saying that Ive had three dogs, but only one of them could speak coherently. But, sadly, even the lower percentage, both of coffee drinkers and talking dogs, flies in the face of reality.

If you read further, youll discover that the study was done in China. The thugs in charge there lie as often as they tell the truth, but I figure this is accurate.

Chinese scientists monitored 171,000 people for seven years. At the beginning of the study, none of the participants had cancer or heart disease. According to Luke Andrews, the health reporter for DailyMail.com, the research team found those who regularly drank coffee were about a third less likely to die than those who did not.

Does that help explain? Not by much.

The article goes on to tell us that the researchers found that it didnt matter whether the coffee was plain or sweetened with sugar.

Well, at least theres that. But I still find the explanation lacking.

Reading on, I learn that during the seven-year study, the deaths that occurred numbered 3,177 (including 1,725 from cancer and 628 from heart disease).

It seems that simply drinking hot drinks lowered mortality somewhat, but the participants who reported at the start of the study that they drank 1.5 to 3.5 cups of coffee daily, well, they were 30% less likely to die during the seven years.

The researchers went on to mention (this is my paraphrase) that many health benefits have previously been reported in studies regarding coffee. (Ive been noting those for years.) But this study was not specifically designed to study coffee consumption. Their coffee discovery was just observational, a surprise, and they are drawing no major conclusions from it.

If youre interested, do a web search (plugging in something like 1.5 to 3.5 cups of coffee), and you can read a lot more.

For my part, Ill add this information regarding the benefits of coffee to my personal stash of such material. Ive felt better for a long time now knowing that my love for coffee has been good for me, not that Id have stopped drinking it if the evidence had pointed in the other direction.

Ever since health evidence mistakenly touted margarines benefits over butter and thus robbed me of years of buttery flavor my policy regarding most health news is watchful waiting. I can usually wait out the reports I dont like. Since they change more easily and quickly than Im willing to change my habits, this approach has worked well. Folks who worry too much about such are more likely to die early of stress than those of us who dont. Thats my own study.

With regard to coffee, which I hold in very high regard, I cant imagine how anyone wakes up, thinks, or writes without it.

But the truth is that my interest in this particular coffee article waned a good bit after I realized that the study isnotindicating any sort of immortality connected to coffee consumption.

Im OK with that. In this present world, enoughs enough. And I am completely convinced that the Author of life has the ultimate immortality thing well in hand.

Curtis Shelburne writes about faith for The Eastern New Mexico News. Contact him at:

[emailprotected]

See the original post:

Faith: God is the ultimate authority on immortality - easternnewmexiconews.com

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Faith: God is the ultimate authority on immortality – easternnewmexiconews.com

Netflix Games August 2022: Immortality, Wild Things: Animal Adventures, Rival Pirates, and Heads Up Announced (Update) TouchArcade – Touch Arcade

Posted: at 11:54 am

Update: Netflix has confirmed to us on July 26th that Wild Things: Animal Adventures is launching in August in place of Twelve Minutes which has been delayed to a later date. Updated story below.

Netflix just revealed four games coming to the service next month. The Netflix Games August 2022 additions include the FMV game Immortality from Sam Barlow (Her Story, Telling Lies), the party charades game Heads Up!, Wild Things: Animal Adventures, and the 3D adventure game Rival Pirates. These will all be arriving soon. The interactive movie trilogy Immortality was originally due this month, but was delayed to next month. A definite date hasnt been announced for it yet. The Netflix version of Heads Up! will include decks based on Netflix titles. Watch the Immortality trailer below:

Following the announcement of the four games included, Netflix confirmed to us that Twelve Minutes will not be releasing on mobile next month through Netflix Games. Instead, Wild Things: Animal Adventures from Jam City, a match-3 puzzler, will be arriving on the service. All four of August 2022s additions to Netflix are coming soon, and they will be joining the recently released and amazing Poinpy and Into the Breach. Netflix is bringing the kind of games youd see from Apple Arcade if Apple hadnt switched over to more engagement-focused titles. So many great indie games have been announced already, with more to come this year. Ive already played some of them on console, but love checking out more high quality indies on mobile. What are you looking forward to on Netflix this year when it comes to new games?

Read the original here:

Netflix Games August 2022: Immortality, Wild Things: Animal Adventures, Rival Pirates, and Heads Up Announced (Update) TouchArcade - Touch Arcade

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Netflix Games August 2022: Immortality, Wild Things: Animal Adventures, Rival Pirates, and Heads Up Announced (Update) TouchArcade – Touch Arcade

Heres why this mushroom-shaped diamond ring from Kerala broke the world record – Lifestyle Asia Kuala Lumpur

Posted: at 11:54 am

The Guinness World Records has a new record-breaking diamond ring, thanks to a Kerala-based jeweller. This mushroom-shaped diamond ring from Kerala has broken the record for the most diamonds set in one ring.

This was recorded in Karathode, Kerala, on May 5, 2022. According to Guinness World Records, this mushroom-shaped diamond ring is set with 24,679 natural diamonds. The ring is aptly titled Ami, which means immortality in Sanskrit. The ring is based on the shape of a pink oyster mushroom, as the mushroom represents immortality and longevity. The ring also entails a quote from SWA Diamonds Managing Director Abdul Gafur Anadiyan.

A lot of thought and hard work was put into the making of the ring. Not to forget, time too. It took the jeweller three months to make this ring. According to Guinness World Records, After 3D printing, liquid gold was then poured into the mould, cooled and filed into the overall shape of 41 unique mushroom petals. With the base complete, each diamond was then meticulously placed by hand on each side of the mushroom petals. Natural diamonds were used.

With a hefty price tag of $ 95,243 (approx. RM424,640), the ring weighs 340 grams, which is three-quarters of a pound. The Guinness record was awarded to the mushroom-shaped ring from Kerala after it was verified by a team of independent gemologists. After this, the number of diamonds was counted by Guinness officials using a microscope, who also evaluated and confirmed the clarity, carat, weight, cut type and the type of diamonds used.

This record was previously held by Meerut-based businessman Harshit Bansal, who had achieved the title in 2020 for his floral design bejewelled with 12,638 diamonds.

Hero Image: Courtesy SWA Diamonds, Featured Image: Courtesy SWA Diamonds

See more here:

Heres why this mushroom-shaped diamond ring from Kerala broke the world record - Lifestyle Asia Kuala Lumpur

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Heres why this mushroom-shaped diamond ring from Kerala broke the world record – Lifestyle Asia Kuala Lumpur

Can you name the Blackburn XI that clinched the Premier League title in 1995? – Planet Football

Posted: at 11:54 am

Blackburn Roverswon the Premier League in 1995, pipping a dominant Manchester United side to the post but can you name the Rovers XI from the match that sealed the title on the final day?

Blackburn were on the cusp of greatness before the 1994-95 season; theyd finished second the year before and owner Jack Walker had invested heavily in both the playing staff and manager Kenny Dalglish.

And Blackburn set the pace for most of the season, playing some sublime football along the way and opening up an eight-point lead over United by the middle of April.

Defeats against Manchester City and West Ham allowed United to close the gap but Rovers entered the final day of the season knowing that victory at Liverpool would seal their first league title since 1914.

In the event, Blackburn lost 2-1 at Anfield with Jamie Redknapp scoring a last-minute winner. But United were held to a draw at West Ham, meaning Dalglishs side had won the league by a single point.

Rovers never came close to retaining their title and were relegated in 1999, adding to the sense of immortality about their achievement and were asking you to name the XI that clinched the title at Anfield in May 1995.

Its a line-up packed full of Premier League legends but there are some unfamiliar names sprinkled around too. The score to beat from the Planet Football office is 03:13.

And, if this gets you in the mood for another quiz, have a go atnaming every player to score 10 or more Premier League goals in 2008-09.

If youve not already, sign up for a Planet Sport account to access hints for those tricky answers, to reveal the ones youve missed, and to register your score on the leaderboard. Registering is free, fast, and gets you access to old articles as well as site personalisation and competitions.

Good luck, and dont forget to tweet us your scores@planetfutebol.

Can you name Blackburns XI that won the League Cup final in 2002?

Can you name every club to ever appear in the Premier League?

Continue reading here:

Can you name the Blackburn XI that clinched the Premier League title in 1995? - Planet Football

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Can you name the Blackburn XI that clinched the Premier League title in 1995? – Planet Football

International Tiger Day: Take A Walk In The Wild With These Nature Talks – Outlook India

Posted: at 11:54 am

As we head towards completing 50 years of tiger conservation in India, Taj Safaris, India's first and only luxury wildlife circuit, celebrates International Tiger Day by providing viewers a peek into the wondrous realm of the animal kingdom. Indulge in engaging talks about wildlife through the four-part webinar series, Nature Talks with Taj Safaris hosted from July 29 to September 4 passionately narrated by expert naturalists sharing first-hand knowledge on subjects that seek to build awareness.

An Ode To 'Collarwali' by naturalist Kopal Thakur from Baghvan, A Taj Safari Pench National Park, will take you back in time where Collarwali, the iconic tigress attained immortality in the teak forests of Pench. Unravel the life of successful predators as the Whistling Hunters of Central India by naturalist Yajuvendra from Banjaar Tola, A Taj Safari - Kanha National Park brings alive the magic of the Indian jungles.

Get acquainted with the prowess of preservation, civilization's ethics of co-existence with nature and the commitment to reverse the looming decline of multiple species from our wild heritages with naturalist Ramesh from Mahua Kothi, A Taj Safari Bandhavgarh National Park on Conservation Success Stories of India. Lastly, The Flying Rulers by Naturalist Tarun from Pashan Garh, A Taj Safari - Panna National Park will take you soaring into the world of some of the most endangered birds on the planet.

Read more from the original source:

International Tiger Day: Take A Walk In The Wild With These Nature Talks - Outlook India

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on International Tiger Day: Take A Walk In The Wild With These Nature Talks – Outlook India

Emily Wilson Diary: Artemis is with us LRB 4 August 2022 – London Review of Books

Posted: at 11:54 am

The sanctuary at Brauron, not far from Athens, was the site of an important cult to Artemis. There are impressive reconstructed remains of the temple to the goddess and the three-sided stoa, which would have served as the cafeteria area, as well as the sacred spring. Visitors can cross the only stone bridge that survives from ancient Greece, complete with grooves like trolley-tracks to ease the path of wheels, indicating the number of trips made by expensive vehicles, laden with food and clothing as well as worshippers. The Athenian elite brought their tween daughters from the temple of Artemis on the Acropolis to the temple at Brauron to take part in various rituals, including a large festival known as the Brauronia. It was held every four years and involved the ritual presentation of garments to the goddess, the grinding of grain and the dedication of toys and dolls, which the girls gave up to symbolise the end of childhood and the prospect of marriage.

The little museum at Brauron contains a rich collection of archaeological finds: jewellery, statues and reliefs representing the procession of worshippers laden with offerings. The most affecting exhibits are the toys discovered in the rich mud around the site: knuckle bones, little carts with wheels (even before cars, kids played with toy cars) and dolls with articulated limbs that look very like Yoga Barbie (these dolls, like their modern counterparts, would have come with stylish interchangeable outfits). The marshy soil of the spring, into which many small, precious offerings were thrown, enabled the preservation of an extraordinarily high number of wooden artefacts, including fragments of chests or boxes and a female statuette perhaps representing the statue of Artemis supposedly brought to Brauron by Iphigenia, to whom there was also a cult on this site.

According to myth, Artemis refused to grant the Greek forces a favourable wind to set sail for Troy because Agamemnon, the leader of the expedition, had killed her sacred deer. She required him to make a terrible sacrifice: he must kill his own daughter, Iphigenia, to pay for fair passage to Troy, or lose his chance to enrich and empower himself by a great military victory. The slaughter of Iphigenia foreshadows the massacre and enslavement of many more civilians during the Trojan War, and sets in motion Agamemnons own death at the hands of his wife, Clytemnestra, in revenge for their daughter. The murder of daughter by father represents the tension within ancient Athenian society between loyalty to the household, including the women of the family, and loyalty to the public community, dominated by men. Aeschylus version of the myth, in the Agamemnon, presents the sacrifice of Iphigenia as the primary dilemma on which a new model of patriarchal democratic politics must eventually be founded. It is both a choice and no choice at all: the girl is bound and gagged before being killed, but her father, too, is bound by the yoke of necessity. Euripides later interpretation, Iphigenia at Aulis, composed towards the end of the Peloponnesian War (which Athens would lose), ascribes more agency and more self-delusion to the callous father and to his idealistic, self-sacrificing child, and finds in the myth a dark picture of selfish, over-privileged men who value their own interests and reputations over the lives of young people. But there was another version of the story. In it, Agamemnons attempt to kill his daughter did not result in her death, because the goddess, at the last moment, switched the girl for a deer, and transported Iphigenia to Tauris on the Black Sea, where she became a priestess, and from where she was eventually rescued by her long-lost brother, Orestes, who helped her escape to Brauron, bringing with her a sacred statue of Artemis.

The existence of multiple Iphigenia myths speaks to one of the central anxieties for any parent of a daughter: will the transition to adulthood inevitably mean less freedom (the gag in her mouth and around her limbs) and more danger, both from men in positions of political power and from men in her own household? Can mothers save daughters from fathers and husbands? What will happen to our wild ones? Will they be tamed, and broken by the taming? The girls who went to ancient Brauron to undergo the symbolic loss of their girlhood would have known that for them, as for their mothers, marriage might well mean death. Many would already have lost their own mothers or aunts or cousins to childbirth: part of the festival involved offering up these womens garments to the goddess. Contemplating the rockfall beside the cave, I found it easy to imagine the worshippers and mourners crowded in that dark, narrow space, a memorial to the pain, constraint and danger that attend on those who bleed. Artemis, an immortal virgin, goddess of the menstrual moon, was also the Olympian most closely associated with childbirth and gynaecological ailments, and the worshippers at the temple would have included adult women who stood in need of her protection, and her power to punish men who overstepped the mark.

The version of the myth in which Iphigenia manages to get away from her father offers a glimpse of hope or a fantasy of escape from patriarchal danger, the prospect that girls or women might somehow activate a different kind of power. The ancient initiates at Brauron were called little bears or bear-cubs (arktoi), and they seem to have pretended to be bears, perhaps with the help of masks and costumes a reference to another myth about the killing of an animal sacred to Artemis, a bear, and also a hint at their ferocity and strength. Bears are rare in modern Greece, and we didnt see any when I visited last month. The sun was too high in the sky for most of the wild creatures favoured by Artemis, the lady of wild things, potnia theron; all the rabbits and mice were hiding in the undergrowth. I went to Brauron with the poet Alicia Stallings, who recently translated the Batrachomyomachia, or The Battle between the Frogs and the Mice, an ancient mock-epic that reduces the Iliads grand meditation on the relationship between rage, violence and grief to a miniature scale, and reimagines Iliadic warriors as tiny animals, fully anthropomorphised and equipped with feelings of sorrow, anger, curiosity and xenophobia (as well as ingeniously scaled-down Homeric weapons). Walking through the marshes, we searched for toads or frogs, hoping to catch a glimpse of the treacherous, amphibian villains of the Batrachomyomachia lurking in the creek, or to hear their croaky song (Brekekekex, koax, koax!). No frogs sang for us. But there were dragonflies, whirring like drones through the thick rushes, tiny lizards on the rocks, sparrows chattering amid the ruins, bright red, blue and yellow flowers growing in the stones around the shrine and at last, at the edge of the path, a large snake slithering into the long grass, perhaps on its way to shed its skin and become its new self.

Shades of the prison-house begin to close/Upon the growing boy, the speaker laments in Wordsworths Immortality Ode. In most societies, constrictions of much more obvious kinds close in around growing girls. Several Hellenistic epigrams from the Greek Anthology evoke the transition from girlhood to womanhood, and hint at the vulnerability and loss of freedom that this will entail. Here is one, dating to around 100 BCE, by Antipater of Sidon. The poem is in the voice of the young girls headband, now set aside so that the teenagers wild hair can be constrained by the headgear of an adult woman.

The girl with thick, abundant hair, named Pony,has tied it back, and washed her scented face,because her time of marriage has arrived.I am the headband that she used to wear,but I require the fun and games of girlhood.Artemis, grant the child of Lycomedesmarriage and offspring, in your kindness, please,now she has given up her knuckle bones.

Perhaps the headband has an ulterior motive for presenting the transition to a different form of headgear as one involving constraint and loss. But the poem also hints that there may be a difference between the perspective of the girl herself and that of her father, who wants her to produce offspring to continue his line.

Alicia and I both have tween daughters. They were not with us on the trip, but it was easy to imagine them scrambling over the ruins (which is of course forbidden) or going into bored adolescent sulks as the adults talked on. It was easy, too, to imagine their ancient counterparts, dressed in the yellow saffron dresses approved by the goddess, roaming over the marshes looking for frogs and snakes and tadpoles, climbing rocks and wading into the muddy water, competing in races, dressing up and doing one anothers hair, and forming intense and complex friendships. Alicias poem Verge, about an earlier trip to Brauron, asks the goddess to allow her daughter to keep her wildness: Leave in her something else, unnamed,/Untrammelled, liminal, untamed.

I remember being told, when I first got my period, You are now a woman, and then warned not to clog the toilet. The social pressure to inhabit this new identity, woman, seemed to be somehow intertwined with the pain and the mess. My primary source of comfort during the miserable period of early adolescence was my pet rabbit, an animal favoured by Artemis (my children have goddess-approved pet rats). Back home in West Philadelphia, I went with my two younger children (aged twelve and eleven) to a modern version of the Brauronia: a period party. Our ritual was organised by Tara Rubenstein, the leader of a youth group called Artemis Pack, intended for girls, non-binary and gender-queer kids aged between seven and fourteen. Not all the kids who participated in the ceremony were girls; one was a trans boy, several were gender-fluid or non-binary or demi-girl; non-menstruators were also welcome.

The period party began with the younger kids anointing the older ones with glitter and perfume before they gathered around the fire pit. Each in turn took a pinch of scented herbs and scattered them into the fire to say goodbye to childhood a ritual borrowed from the Brauronia. The kids seemed for the most part eager to embrace their maturity (and excited at the opportunity to play with fire). Each parent also took a pinch and gave it to the fire, to renounce (less happily) their childrens childhoods. Each not-quite-adult was given red ribbons to plait, reminding them that they can choose how to braid the strands of their own life and which traditions, values and relationships they want to carry forward. There was a ritual sip of red wine (a thrillingly taboo moment for 12-year-olds) and then the kids were wrapped together in a huge green blanket, before it was released to let them out into the world.

The last element of the ceremony is different every year, because it is a response to the social and political issues that might affect a person at the very beginning of adult life. Last year, they meditated on the California wildfires. This year, the topic was the abolition of the constitutional right to abortion in the US. The physical violation of forced pregnancy, and its numberless medical, financial, social and psychological consequences, will become inescapable for many. It is hard not to be enraged by the hypocrisy and callousness of the removal of the option of safe, legal abortion from those who need it. Will my beautiful, wild, quirky kids and their friends be able to find a way out of the gags and the nets cast around their bodies, and hold onto their magical strangeness, their autonomy, their freedom?

At the end of the ceremony, we ate vagina-shaped pasta stuffed with tomato sauce and a cake, constructed with great care by one of my children, that oozed sticky red jam. I imagined the embarrassment and mockery that would have greeted this in the Oxford of my childhood and hoped that the goddess might send us a sign of her favour. Just then, a groundhog ran through the weeds at the bottom of the garden. Even in Pennsylvania, Artemis is with us.

Excerpt from:

Emily Wilson Diary: Artemis is with us LRB 4 August 2022 - London Review of Books

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Emily Wilson Diary: Artemis is with us LRB 4 August 2022 – London Review of Books

The Legend of Unthinkable 1930 Travers Winner Jim Dandy – America’s Best Racing

Posted: at 11:54 am

When horses achieve greatness, or accomplish particularly memorable feats, it is customary for stakes races to be named in their honor. Across the country, there are races the bear the names of legends like Man o War, Secretariat, Kelso, and Cigar; even more recent greats like Zenyatta, Rachel Alexandra, and Wise Dan are remembered with stakes races.

Every summer, Saratoga Race Coursein New York hosts the Jim Dandy Stakes, a major prep for the prestigious Travers Stakes later in the Saratoga meet. It is only fitting that the Jim Dandy Stakes is a prep for the Travers, since it was in the 1930 Travers that an unassuming 3-year-old chestnut colt pulled off one of the most astonishing upsets in the history of horse racing to ensure that his name would never be forgotten.

His name, naturally, was Jim Dandy. His sire father) was Jim Gaffney, winner of the 1907 Hopeful Stakes and a successful stallion that had already sired the 1923 Preakness Stakes winner Vigil. Jim Dandys dam (mother) was Thunderbird, a daughter of the very successful sire Star Shoot, and further back in Jim Dandys pedigree were the names of many other famous horses, including Epsom Derby winner Bend Or, English Triple Crown winner Isinglass, and the remarkable U.S. sire Lexington.

This was a remarkable contrast to 1930s leading 3-year-old Gallant Fox, a seemingly unbeatable colt that had won the Wood Memorial in his seasonal debut before adding the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Belmont Stakes to sweep the Triple Crown. Showing no signs of slowing down, Gallant Fox won the Dwyer Stakes by 1 lengths so easily that his Daily Racing Form past performances include the notation loafed, and two weeks later, he won the rich Arlington Classic then worth more than any of the Triple Crown races by a neck after a long stretch battle.

Much like 2015 Triple Crown winner American Pharoah, Gallant Fox was a rising star making history with every startas he headed to Saratoga for the prestigious Travers Stakes on Aug. 16, and there were few people that believed Gallant Fox could be beaten. He had it all excellent early speed, a powerful finishing kick, and proven ability on both fast and wet tracks. He would be facing only three rivals in the Travers, and only one Whichone, the leading 2-year-old of 1929 and a winner of three straight races at Saratoga was expected to have a chance of pulling off an upset.

The odds reflected this confidence. Gallant Fox was made the heavy favorite at 1-2 while Whichone was sent off at 8-5 and third choice Sun Falcon was 30-1. Jim Dandy? No one thought he had a chance, and his odds were a staggering 100-1.

But then two factors combined to dramatically change the complexion of the race. First, rain reduced the track to a muddy, wet mess officially labeled heavy, a condition deeper and wetter than Gallant Fox was used to encountering.

Secondly, when the horses were sent on their way at the start of the race, Whichone showed more early speed than in the past and engaged Gallant Fox in a tremendous battle for the lead.

All of thesudden, a speed duel was underway.

Sonny Workman, the jockey of Whichone, believed that the outside part of the track might be faster than the rail, and allowed Whichone to run many paths off the rail throughout the race. Gallant Fox, drawn outside of Whichone, had no choice but to go even wider, and both colts lost a tremendous amount of ground while setting fast fractions of :25 flat, :49 2/5, and 1:13 3/5. In the meantime, several lengths behind them, Jim Dandy hugged the rail in third place, splashing happily through the muddy conditions that he loved.

As the race went on and Gallant Fox and Whichone continued their intense battle for the lead, there was a sudden flash of movement along the rail. As the leaders began to tire from their exhausting efforts, a longshot was rallying fast on the inside. Turning for home, with Gallant Fox and Whichone on the far outside, the improbable ...the impossible ...the unthinkable suddenly unfolded before the eyes of the 30,000 fans in attendance.

Gallant Fox, the Triple Crown winner and seemingly unbeatable champion, had lost the lead. And the new leader was a chestnut blur named Jim Dandy.

For Gallant Fox, the Travers would mark his only loss of the season; after his shocking defeat, he rebounded to win the Saratoga Cup, Lawrence Realization, and Jockey Club Gold Cup to retire with record earnings of $328,165. In contrast, Jim Dandy would never win another stakes race, and he eventually retired at the age of 12 with a record of just seven wins from 141 starts. In his last four seasons of racing, he never even finished in the trifecta.

Yes, for the majority of their careers, there was no comparing Gallant Fox and Jim Dandy. But on one summer day at Saratoga, it was Jim Dandy who reached the winners circle and achieved immortality in his own way.

See more here:

The Legend of Unthinkable 1930 Travers Winner Jim Dandy - America's Best Racing

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on The Legend of Unthinkable 1930 Travers Winner Jim Dandy – America’s Best Racing