The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: July 25, 2022
Flying with Ingenuity: The Mars Helicopter NASA Mars Exploration – NASA Mars Exploration
Posted: July 25, 2022 at 2:49 am
July 20, 2022
TRANSCRIPT
(music)
Narrator: On a cold and wind-swept December day in 1903, in the Outer Banks of North Carolina, Orville and Wilbur Wright flew a powered, controlled aircraft for 12 seconds the first such flight in the history of the world.
sound effect: aircraft flight
Narrator: More than a hundred years later, in April 2021, another world saw its first powered, controlled aircraft flight when NASAs Ingenuity helicopter lifted up into the skies of Mars.
sound effect: helicopter rise
Narrator: Teddy Tzanetos, team lead for the Ingenuity mission, says the trickier nature of helicopters made the first flight on Mars even more perilous.
Teddy Tzanetos: Helicopters, in general, you're beating the air into submission from microsecond to microsecond. You have these tiny mechanical parts spinning at 2,500 revolutions per minute. Just take a moment and think about that. It's incredibly fast, which means that when things go wrong, they go wrong catastrophically.
sound effect: helicopter
[1:04] sound effect: whoosh
Teddy Tzanetos: If there's some imbalance in your rotor system, because something broke or fell off, your entire rotor system will explode. That's just true of all helicopters, right? All helicopters are precisely and carefully balanced pieces of art. And the fact that helicopters work to begin with is a testament to just engineering in general, and the beauty behind it.
Narrator: The Ingenuity helicopter was a technology demonstration meant to test whether it was possible to fly a rotorcraft on Mars. Ingenuity hitched a ride with NASAs Mars 2020 mission, which sent the Perseverance rover to collect rock samples and look for evidence of ancient life. Ingenuity was strapped to the belly of Perseverance during the journey to Mars, and so had to be small enough to fit easily beneath the SUV-sized rover.
[1:54] Teddy Tzanetos: In terms of the dimensions, we have two counter-rotating coaxial rotor blades. The blades themselves are 1.2 meters from tip to tip. The electronics box, which is that silvery-colored box underneath the rotor blade system, that's where our computers are, that's where our battery resides. That's where all of our critical electronic components exist on Ingenuity. It's about the size of a tissue box. The legs come off from that central structure, and then, of course, our solar panel on top. It's a very compact design. On the surface, when we were fully deployed on the ground, Perseverance was able to clearly drive over Ingenuity.
Narrator: A fixed-wing aircraft, like the Wright Brothers Flyer and most planes on Earth today, wasnt a practical design for the first flight on Mars.
Teddy Tzanetos: With most aircraft, you need a runway. But unless Perseverance was going to spend a couple of weeks paving a pebble-free runway for us, that was going to be a challenge.
Fixed-wing can be a lot more efficient, right? You can glide. You don't have to spend as much energy going from point A to point B. And if you have an anomaly in an aircraft and your motor kicks out, you could glide to safety. But you can't also just stop and hover. On the helicopter side, though, you spend a lot more energy just to hover, but now you can hover. And you can do precision landing precisely where you'd like to land.
[3:14] Narrator: Ingenuity was built to be as lightweight as possible, and yet the team added one extra item, under the helicopters solar panel, to provide an inspirational lift to their mission: a postage-stamp-sized bit of muslin fabric that had once covered a wing of the Wright Brothers 1903 aircraft. Members of the Wright family and Carillon Historical Park, home to the Wright Brothers National Museum in Dayton Ohio, provided the fabric.
This isnt the first time Wright Brothers fabric has flown into space. Neil Armstrong brought some of the fabric, as well as a small piece of wood from the propeller, to the Moon in 1969. In 1998, nearly four decades after he became the first American to orbit Earth, John Glenn carried a swatch of the fabric when he flew on Space Shuttle Discovery. Heres Bob Balaram, chief engineer of the Ingenuity mission.
[4:11] Bob Balaram: I was looking for an artifact to put on the helicopter, and we had considered perhaps putting an American penny there's one where it has the Wright Brothers Flyer on one side. But then once we realized we could actually get to the real Wright Brothers fabric, we jumped on it.
So, it presented its own challenges. We had to sterilize it just right, and we had to make sure that it wouldn't contaminate the spacecraft. My contamination control and planetary protection engineers went to, I think, JoAnn Fabrics and got some samples so that they could try their heat-sterilization process on the samples first, before actually trying it on the piece of the real Wright Brothers fabric.
And this is the perfect thing to take, not only for me, but for the team as a whole. There's that connection to the past which is always inspiring.
[5:00] (intro music)
Narrator: Welcome to On a Mission, a podcast of NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Im Leslie Mullen, and in this fourth season of the podcast, were following in the tracks of rovers on Mars. This is episode seven: Flying with Ingenuity: the Mars Helicopter.
(music)
[5:57] Narrator: The Ingenuity helicopter is of course not a traditional rover: a remotely-controlled wheeled vehicle that roves on the ground. Ingenuity represents a new generation of robotic explorers, but, in a way, its repeating Mars rover history. Sojourner, the first Mars rover in 1997, was a technology demonstration added to the Pathfinder lander mission to test whether we could drive a vehicle on Mars from millions of miles away.
Tech demos are always risky, with high odds for failure, so not everyone at NASA was on board with either Ingenuity or Sojourner. Bob Balaram didnt work directly on Sojourner like he did for Ingenuity, but as a member of JPLs robotics group, he helped develop the necessary technology to make the first Mars rover possible.
Bob Balaram: In terms of being a first-of-a-kind system that had skeptics and needed to prove itself, and there wasn't quite the textbook as to how to do it, yeah, a lot of similarities. For its time, it had its challenges and naysayers. We had ours.
[7:07] We are in some ways a tougher problem. A helicopter is inherently an unstable vehicle so that it needs everything to work to keep it in the air. Sojourner had the advantage that if something had failed, it's at least not going to topple out of the sky and smash into pieces. So you could wait and call home if there was an issue.
Narrator: The success of the microwave-oven-sized Sojourner rover got people thinking about more audacious Mars exploration vehicles, including ones that could lift up into the thin, mostly carbon dioxide atmosphere.
Bob Balaram: The idea of a Mars helicopter was quite prevalent in certain communities back in the 1990s. The American Helicopter Society ran a student competition to say, Take something like Pathfinder, but instead of carrying Sojourner, imagine that if you could carry a helicopter in the same technology, and get it to Mars, what would be your design?
[8:03] So around the same time was a talk being presented by Stanford professor Ilan Kroo, on some of the challenges of flying in a low-density atmosphere. And I attended his talk, and then got to thinking that flying a small thing on Earth which is what he was trying to do, tiny little micro-helicopters is the same as flying something larger on Mars, because that's the way the physics scales with the thinner atmosphere you have on Mars.
So Ilan and I wrote a proposal, and a small company in Simi Valley, called AeroVironment, was going to build us a small helicopter. Remember back in the 1990s, you didn't have all these drones that you could just buy, even to just play around with. And so, we were the three legs of that initial research proposal, but it didn't go anywhere.
We got actually favorable reviews from the review people, and we thought we would have had one year of funding. But it was also the year where NASAs budget was under a lot of pressure. You know, that's always the background story at NASA. So they barely funded anything that year in this particular area. So my little proposal sat on a shelf for about 14 or 15 years.
[9:15] Narrator: In his more than 37 years of working at JPL, Bob is used to working on projects that are so far ahead of their time, they end up taking a lot of space on a shelf.
Bob Balaram: This is the robotics section at JPL where we basically do mobility in all kinds of environments, whether it's rovers or crawlers or walking machines or some flying machines, too. We're always looking to the future, to see what kinds of new mobility technology can we bring?
So along the way, I've worked on things like Mars balloons and Venus balloons. There was even a short-lived NASA idea to go and grab an asteroid and bring it back. Again, there is a (laughs) final report gathering dust somewhere on that one. The ratio of super cool missions to feasible missions is probably 10 to 1. But of those feasible ones, the ones that actually make it all the way to the end is probably like 100 to 1. We do let a thousand flowers bloom, but only one of them gets to the end point.
[10:17] Narrator: The seed of the Mars helicopter idea germinated while NASA was developing the Mars 2020 mission. The team designing the helicopter knew they couldnt be a burden on the planned rover, but getting Perseverance to adopt Ingenuity wasnt easy.
Bob Balaram: There were a lot of naysayers, like, What do you mean, Mars helicopter? That doesn't make sense. You won't be able to fly. The airs too thin. It took a lot of courageous people to back us up. There was resistance correctly so, I think from the mission that had been asked to accommodate us. That was not something that they wanted to do, so it took some persuasion. And it had to pass all its tests to the satisfaction of the Perseverance folks. So every step of the way, we could have been abandoned.
[11:05] In fact, the way the rover did its belly pan, which is where we are located, there is a version of the belly pan somewhere that doesn't have Ingenuity on it. In other words, it doesn't have all the hooks and things for Ingenuity. Let's say the flight unit had failed a structural test before launch. They would have probably put this other alternative little belly pan onto the rover and flown without us.
So it was every step of the way. First-of-a-kind system you don't know whats going to work, whats not going to work. How much time do you spend refining a design, or is it good enough? How do you make that judgment call? So the metaphor that this is a Wright Brothers moment is not just in the sense that it's the first flight on another planet which is pretty cool by itself but the fact that you're going into the unknown.
Our first scale vehicle was unstable, and it took a lot of engineering and analysis of the physics of flying in thin atmospheres for us to understand that instability and work around it. Even our NASA helicopter experts were surprised by that. So they had to also go back to the textbooks, so to speak, to understand the fundamental physics, just to make sure we even have stability in the air.
[12:12] So, it's just across the board exploring a completely new terrain. Nothing was a given. Literally there was a crisis and I use the word without too much hyperbole there was a crisis on the project every week for the seven years that it took to get this going. But I got used to that, and kind of thrive on it, actually, because any time there's a problem, there's something fun to solve, right? That's what made it exciting.
(music)
Narrator: One of the biggest pressures of the mission was the lack of air pressure on Mars. Air pressure is the collective force of air molecules pushing against a planet, drawn there by gravity. On Earth, our thicker atmosphere and stronger gravity results in an average surface air pressure of over 1,000 millibars. The 6 millibars of surface air pressure on Mars is a mere whisp in comparison.
[13:07] For a helicopter to fly, it needs enough air for the fast-spinning blades to push against, and because atmospheres get less dense the farther you rise from the surface, helicopters on Earth are limited in how high they can fly. So how could a helicopter ever fly on Mars?
Bob Balaram: Mars has an extremely thin atmosphere it's equivalent to flying at 100,000 feet here on Earth. If you had a block of air let's say you spread your arms out wide and made a big cube here on the surface of the Earth it would be about 2 pounds or so. That same cube of Martian air would only weigh an ounce. Which means that if you want to fly, you have to move that air, which means your blades have to be special for that thin air. And theyve got to move quite fast in order to push enough air downwards so that you get the lift upwards.
[14:00] Then, even if you build the system that would produce lift, it has to produce more lift than its weight. And not just the weight of the rotor, but everything else you need to carry with it, right? You're carrying batteries and computers and solar panels and radios and wiring and all those things that have nothing to do with flying, but you've got to carry that with you. So basically 4 pounds was pretty much the upper limit. As I've joked, it's very easy to build a Mars helicopter of the same size as Ingenuity and have it weigh 5 pounds, and it would sit on the surface of Mars and spin its blades, but it wouldn't go anywhere.
And so, I was managing the mass on the design down to the gram and sub-gram level. So if my computer guy said, Hey, I really want 6 grams for this processor, and there was another processor that was only 4 grams, he and I would have a long discussion before I relinquished 2 grams to him to let him implement a slightly larger processor.
Narrator: Such a lightweight aircraft could be at the mercy of high winds. Because of the thin atmosphere, the winds on Mars arent as powerful as winds on Earth, but Ingenuity still needed to be tested to see how it would perform in even the gentlest of Mars breezes.
[15:16] Bob Balaram: When it came time to test how our helicopter interacts with the winds, guess what? There is no wind tunnel that simultaneously does the thin air density of Mars and the low velocities that we were testing. We're not testing winds that are tens of miles per hour. We are testing winds that are a few miles per hour, right? There is no facility in the country that can do that.
And so, yours truly and his team (laughs) built a wind tunnel that we installed in our JPL 25-foot chamber. And it used about 900 CPU fans from your desktop computers to arrange in a square array to basically be a wind tunnel that we could blow air sideways on the helicopter, as it spun its blades up.
[16:02] Narrator: JPLs 25-foot Space Simulator is a stainless-steel cylinder 25 feet wide and 85 feet high. Normally, spacecraft placed in this chamber are subjected to extreme cold, airless vacuum, and simulated solar radiation to make sure they can survive a trip in outer space. The Ingenuity team turned the chamber into a one-of-a-kind Mars testbed.
Bob Balaram: That facility has the ability to pump down this big chamber to vacuum. In our case, we said, Please fill it back with carbon dioxide to the same density that's there on Mars. So we got the atmosphere right, and we did most of the testing at room temperature because that was the cheap and easy thing to do. But we did do a few critical tests where we cooled down that air in the cylinder to Mars temperatures, and so we made sure that nothing funny was happening as the temperatures dropped.
[16:58] Now, of course, the gravity is almost 2.5 times more gravity here on Earth than it is on Mars. So what we did is we basically built an offload device. Think of it as a high-tech fishing line that we attach to the top of the helicopter, and it pulls with an exact constant force equal to the weight difference that we want, so that we get the Mars versus Earth gravity. And it does that regardless of whether the helicopters flying up or down. And so, that allowed us to basically understand the behavior without the extra gravity that we get here on Earth, and making Ingenuity think that it was flying on Mars.
We used various fishing line types of cord material and all kinds of very interesting knots to hold that safely. I think we had three reviews on knots, from climbing experts to top mechanical engineers here on Lab and knot experts, to make sure that there were other safety knots and back-up knots. Literally we were hanging the entire project by a thread, right?
[17:57] Ingenuity test: Spin up. (sound of helicopter flying) Steady.
Bob Balaram: So we did many, many, many months of testing in the 25-foot chamber. And once you bump down the chamber and you put on the carbon dioxide, it's not like you can say, Oh, okay, let's break for the weekend. No, you're going to test right through the weekend. So there was an entire year where every weekend there was testing nonstop. And the testing would be there late.
And my wife, who's a super awesome baker, she'd bake all these wonderful foods. Any time we were testing, she'd bake for the entire test team. And that's what sustained many of us. So she got an official title on this project called CMO, Chief Morale Officer, working to keep the test team happy.
Narrator: After the well-nourished team developed a helicopter that could fly on a simulated Mars, the aircraft had to go through other tests to make sure it could survive the journey to an alien planet.
[19:06] Bob Balaram: It's not only an aircraft, but it's also a spacecraft. You normally don't think of spacecraft design and aircraft design in the same breath. We had to. So we had to survive launch, which has vibrational G-forces where things get really rattled by the very loud noise that the rockets make, and it just shakes the whole structure up.
(sound effect: NASA rocket launch rumble)
Bob Balaram: And so, theres structural requirements. You have to be strong in a certain way to withstand entry, descent and landing forces. You have to survive the radiation of space and continue to operate. We had to survive the vacuum of space, and not just survive, but we had to be a good passenger.
In the vacuum of space, gas likes to travel and condense. A lot of materials like adhesives and glues or plastics, you know, if you leave something on your car on a hot day, and sometimes youll notice an oily film that may have coated the glass that's called outgassing, and its just like little organics in your system that condense on the coldest thing. Anything sent to space cannot have any of those kinds of things, because you don't want your goo to go and land on this camera lens of this wonderful science instrument that is three feet away.
[20:19] Since we were hitching a ride, we had to be extraordinarily safe to the rest of the mission. It's an astrobiology mission looking for signs of past life. We had to be super-duper clean so that we didn't carry, you know, spores and stuff. So we had to be treated like every other instrument that's on the spacecraft.
Narrator: The space capsule carrying the Perseverance rover and the Ingenuity helicopter was ready to leave Earth on July 30, 2020. During the launch coverage, a 4.2 magnitude earthquake hit Southern California.
Announcer Raquel Villanueva: Ingenuitys project manager MiMi Aung joins us now to talk about the set of milestones Ingenuity needs to hit in order to take flight on Mars.[21:03] Ingenuity project manager MiMi Aung: Hi by the way, we just had an earthquake in this room! But anyway, with that, Mars helicopter demo is motivated.
Narrator: Since the mission was launching from NASAs Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the quake only rattled those speaking from JPL. After enduring the tremors of a rocket launch and a seven-months-long spaceflight, the mission landed in Jezero Crater on February 18, 2021.
Announcer Raquel Villanueva: Weve just heard the news that Perseverance is alive on the surface of Mars, congratulations to the mission (applause)
Narrator: Now that Perseverance had arrived safely, the Ingenuity team had their own, second Mars landing to worry about. Ingenuity was still tucked under the rovers belly like a baby kangaroo, and needed to hop out. Heres Teddy Tzanetos again.
Teddy Tzanetos: Right after entry, descent and landing, and Perseverances arrival to the surface, the game was on. There were a handful of weeks where the rover was first trying to go through some systems checks. And on the helicopter side, we were confirming that all systems were green across the board, and looking for our first good airfield to fly in.
[22:15] Thankfully, where Perseverance landed in Jezero crater, there were a lot of good locations right nearby where the rover would drop off the helicopter and we would begin our mission. What we were looking for was effectively a parking lot on Mars. We wanted a nice flat surface that the rover could drive to, and would be free of rock hazards. If one of our feet gets stuck on a rock, we'd be landing on a tilt. Or if we landed directly over a rock, a rock could actually puncture our thermal shroud and cause us to have an early end to our mission.
Narrator: Once Ingenuitys landing spot in Jezero Crater was selected, Perseverance drove over to the center of the area, nicknamed Wright Brothers Field. Ingenuity now was ready to be born.
Teddy Tzanetos: She's our little baby and she's very tough, but we needed to make sure we took good care of her all the way through delivery to Mars. As soon as Ingenuity is finally separated from Perseverance, there's no way to go back. That umbilical is a one-time separation.
[23:13] We were located under the belly of Perseverance. We had a debris shield, so the first step was dropping the debris shield. Then the rover drove up a little bit. Second step was starting our leg releases, and our launch-lock releases. What those mean are different mechanical restraints that were holding the helicopter in a folded config. And we started our multi-step process to, one by one, unfold the legs, rotate the helicopter to its vertical orientation. During our deployments leading up to the final drop, we were using Perseverances camera there's a camera on its arm that it could look underneath the belly. And that helped us determine, yes, deployments were going well.
[23:57] That final separation, there's effectively just a single bolt holding Ingenuity to Perseverances belly. When that bolt snaps, gravity does the rest and Ingenuity falls a handful of inches to the surface. A single circuit, a single wire on the umbilical interface between Perseverance and Ingenuity, went from being a closed circuit to an open circuit. That gave us the indication on the engineering side that, yup, Ingenuity has successfully separated from Perseverance. And from that moment on, Ingenuity is on her own.
And Ingenuity is solar powered. Unlike Perseverance, which has a nuclear-powered energy source, Ingenuity needs photons on its panel. It was critical that soon after Perseverance dropped Ingenuity, Perseverance needed to drive to expose Ingenuitys solar panel to the Sun.
As soon as Ingenuity was deployed, we're on a clock. The timing is dictated by, A: how much energy you have inside of Ingenuitys battery, and how much do you need to recharge? But, B: the time windows when you can receive and send commands from Earth to the rover. You can't do that 24 hours a day. So those comm windows when we could inspect the state of the vehicle, identify if Ingenuity successfully dropped, and then send commands to override if needed, only provided us really about 15 minutes in which to react.
[25:17] So it was a very stressful couple of days leading up to that final deployment, and an even more stressful, it was called the drop-and-drive activity. Thankfully, everything went smoothly, and we were ready to begin our 30-day tech demo mission.
Narrator: After Ingenuity was safely delivered on the surface of Mars, and the Perseverance rover had rolled a short distance away, leaving the helicopter exposed to the open sky, there was a pregnant pause. Ingenuity was not yet awake. The rover silently faced the helicopter, waiting in the deep quiet of Mars to see what would happen next.
Teddy Tzanetos: It could have woken up immediately after it was dropped, but we built in a delay to allow for a whole series of contingencies that could have occurred. As with all space missions, you want to avoid moving too quickly, because that's when mistakes are made. So we had a good margin window 2 hours and 15 minutes after the drop and then Ingenuity woke up. Perseverance was there waiting to communicate, and we established a link, and we were off to the races at that point.
[26:19] Narration: Take note this 2 hour and 15-minute delay between Ingenuity separating from and then talking to the rover will have surprising consequences later in the mission.
After Ingenuity left the warm embrace of Perseverance, and was going through system checks to make sure everything was working well, Bob was fretting about what came next.
Bob Balaram: The most nervous time I had was when we were dropped off onto the ground from Perseverance. It was not obvious that we would survive the night.
(music)
Bob Balaram: When we were on the way to Mars, we had a separate heater that was energized by the rover, which, with its radioactive RTG source, effectively has power to spare, especially for a small little helicopter. But once we were on our own, it was our battery powering our helicopter. And if the battery was drained so much overnight that by morning, if it wasn't enough juice to keep the computer alive, then we would be in big trouble.
[27:24] Were a very small object, and it's always difficult for something small to stay warm. You know, you have a small cup of coffee compared to a big barrel of something, it just cools down faster, right? So the helicopter uses almost three quarters of its energy just staying warm through the night. Its collecting all this energy from the solar panels, harvesting it all day, sticking it into the battery, and then it spends most of that energy depleting the battery to run a bunch of heaters. We couldn't let the batteries freeze out. We couldn't let the electronics get so cold that some little soldered joint somewhere would pop free.
Then on top of that, we really didn't know what kind of winds to expect on Mars that night. And it's the nighttime cold winds that would have really sapped our system.
[28:05] sound effect: wind
Bob Balaram: We had an instrument on the rover called MEDA, which was a weather meteorology station. But it was only just beginning to get commissioned. So we didn't know whether the winds would be twice as much or three times as much. Now, it turned out that the winds are not that bad, and especially the closer you get to the ground, it's even less of an issue. But we didn't know that. So that to me was the most harrowing time.
Narrator: Ingenuity endured its first freezing Martian night on its own, and still had enough power remaining by dawn to run its computer. Now Ingenuity needed to bask in the sun until its solar panels recharged the battery.
[28:56] Bob Balaram: There was indeed a scenario where we could have potentially survived on Mars, but never had enough energy during the course of the day to charge up our battery to the point where we could fly. And you have to fly with a battery that's fairly topped up, because if you don't, the moment the rotors kick in and start drawing high power, the battery voltage will droop and all your electronics will brown out. And you have to be able to have enough energy left to have enough flight time to climb up and do something useful. And so just surviving itself is not enough.
Mission Control 1: This is downlink, confirming battery data has been received.Mission Control 2: Rotor motors appear healthy. Swash plate servos appear healthy, overall actuators appear healthy
Teddy Tzanetos: The mission was really about that first flight. We wanted to prove that humanity could build something that could, in fact, fly on Mars. And that first flight where we took off, hovered, we rotated, came back down, and landed 39.1 seconds later that is the most important flight of Ingenuitys entire lifetime.
[30:04] Mission Control: Altimeter data confirms that Ingenuity has performed its first flight, (shouts, applause) the first flight of a powered aircraft on another planet.
Teddy Tzanetos: I was elated. I was extremely excited. And then it quickly came back to business. We still had a job to do. Yes, Ingenuity had flown, but we still needed to assess its health. Was it still capable of flying again? How did all of our subsystems fare? How did our actuators perform, the battery perform, the thermal system perform? Across the board, we quickly dove back into the data to finish the job at hand.
Narrator: Ingenuitys altimeter data, which tracked how high the helicopter had risen, was the main indication a flight had actually happened.
Teddy Tzanetos: The altimeter data just showed a simple square. So the helicopter rose up, you saw the altimeter data go up. It stayed there, it hovered, had a little bit of noise, then came back down. And when it came back down and stayed at a steady level, we knew that wed landed, and we stayed upright. That was the key success moment there is to know that, yes, the flight was a success, but we also safely landed. And we remained upright, and we had a healthy vehicle that could again fly for flight number two days afterwards.
[31:19] There's a whole rover imaging team that was in the room adjacent to us. And while our data came down, in parallel, the rover imaging team was also quickly trying to come up with their own secondary confirmation that, yes, flight was a success. So within seconds of having our altimetry data, the imaging team was ready to roll and show the video feed to immediately support that conclusion. It was a beautiful one-two punch of emotion.
(audio: team reacts to video of first flight)
Read the original post:
Flying with Ingenuity: The Mars Helicopter NASA Mars Exploration - NASA Mars Exploration
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on Flying with Ingenuity: The Mars Helicopter NASA Mars Exploration – NASA Mars Exploration
BACK TO THE MOON: Countdown and Launch Operations Start in the Rocco A. Petrone Launch Control Center at Kennedy Space Center – SpaceCoastDaily.com
Posted: at 2:49 am
launch control center is nerve center where engineers, launch director monitor their flight consolesWere going back to the Moon but the countdown and launch operations start here, in the Rocco A. Petrone Launch Control Center at NASAs Kennedy Space Center. Engineers control many activities preparing NASAs Space Launch System and NASAs Orion Spacecraft for launch from their consoles in Firing Room 1 utilizing a complex suite of software linking launch team operations to Launch Pad 39B, as well as the Eastern Range and other NASA control centers. (NASA image)
BREVARD COUNTY KENNEDY SPACE CENTER FLORIDA Were going back to the Moon but the countdown and launch operations start here, in the Rocco A. Petrone Launch Control Center at NASAs Kennedy Space Center.
Engineers control many activities preparing NASAs Space Launch System and NASAs Orion Spacecraft for launch from their consoles in Firing Room 1 utilizing a complex suite of software linking launch team operations to Launch Pad 39B, as well as the Eastern Range and other NASA control centers.
The launch control center at NASAs Kennedy Space Center the same launch control that sent the first men to the Moon, launched the Space Shuttle Program, and will one day send the first woman and person of color to the lunar surface was renamed after one of NASAs pioneers in Americas quest for space exploration: Rocco Petrone.
Following a ceremony Feb. 22, 2022, the Launch Control Center at the Florida spaceport was officially renamed the Rocco A. Petrone Launch Control Center. Petrone, who was instrumental in Americas first voyages to the Moon and headed the Apollo program, died in 2006 at the age of 80.
Several Kennedy senior leaders attended the special event, including Center Director Janet Petro, Deputy Director Kelvin Manning, and Launch Director Charlie Blackwell-Thompson, as well as many of Petrones former co-workers.
Its fitting to name this facility for Rocco Petrone, Petro said. Rocco was probably the most influential architect of the Apollo Saturn program in the 1960s, and he was one of the driving forces that helped ensure Neil Armstrong walked on the Moon before the decade was out.
The launch control center serves as a nerve center where engineers and the launch director will monitor their flight consoles and give the go for the upcoming launch of Artemis I and later missions that will establish a sustainable presence on the Moonto prepare for missions to Mars. It was from this same building that Petrone oversaw the launches of the early Apollo lunar missions, and later launch directors launched NASAs shuttles into space.
Today, we recognize the history of this building, at this great facility, by renaming it after one of NASAs pioneers, Rocco Petrone, a man who played a pivotal role in sending the first man to the Moon and inspired generations of future engineers to challenge the status quo and to make what once seemed impossible possible, Blackwell-Thompson said.
When Manning started exploring the possibility of the renaming project and learning more about Petrones influence at Kennedy, he was drawn to a baseball analogy. Specifically, Manning thought of the former Yankee Stadium, known as The House that Ruth Built, after the legendary Babe Ruth.
I asked the question to a number of Kennedy retirees, Was KSC the house that Rocco built? And the response was overwhelmingly, Absolutely, yes. Without him, we would not have made it to the Moon in 1969.
Petrone transferred to Kennedy as an active-duty Army lieutenant colonel in 1960 to serve as Saturn Project Officer. When the United States established its goal of landing a human on the Moon by the end of the 1960s, the Apollo Lunar Landing Program was established.
He managed the planning, development and activation of all launch facilities required for the Apollo Program, including Launch Complex 39, where the Apollo and Saturn V space vehicles were launched. The complex included the Vehicle Assembly Building, the launch towers, the crawler-transporter, and the Mobile Service Structure. He was directly involved in successful launches of the Saturn I and IB as well as the Saturn V rockets.
Following his retirement from the Army in 1966, Petrone became director of Launch Operations at Kennedy. He was responsible for the management and technical direction of pre-flight operations and integration, test, checkout, and launch of all space vehicles, both crewed and uncrewed.
I cant imagine another leader who could have managed that huge, Kennedy workforce so effectively, said John Tribe, who worked under Petrone during the Apollo and shuttle programs. He really was the right man in the right place at the right time. He was instrumental in us successfully achieving President Kennedys Apollo goals.
JoAnn Morgan, the first female engineer and first woman to serve as a senior executive at Kennedy, described Petrone as respectful and professional, with a serious and commanding presence that permeated the environment.
He welcomed me, Morgan said. Accurate data and efficient communication of status were what mattered to him. I am very grateful to have worked for Rocco and observed the excellence in his guidance and decision making.
Petrone directed the first five human-tended Apollo launches, culminating in the Apollo 11 lunar flight. In 1969, he was named director of the Apollo Program for NASA with overall responsibility for the direction and management of the Apollo Space Flight Program.
In 1972, he was assigned additional responsibilities as program director of the NASA portion of the U.S. and the former Soviet Union joint Apollo-Soyuz Test Program. Petrone then served as director of NASAs Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, and as NASA associate administrator until his retirement from NASA in 1975. He worked in private industry during the 1980s and died at his home in Palos Verdes Estates, California in 2006.
In a word, he was brilliant. Demanding, yes, but driven and he drove us to be exactly right, said John Tip Talone, a former flow director in the shuttle program. Never was a stone left unturned or a question unanswered or sloughed off. It was obvious he was not going to let the mission, or his team, fail.
The Florida Chapter of the NASA Alumni League endorsed the naming of the Launch Control Center in Petrones honor because of his strong and positive management style, his ability to problem-solve, and his personal dedication to quality work and positive outcomes, said Chapter President Richard Quinn.
Without his strong leadership, we think the work here at Kennedy for Apollo would have been very different, Quinn said. There were many heroes within NASA and our contractors during those times, but few rose to the prominence and success that Rocco did. His personal drive and commitment to excellence are legendary, and naming the Launch Control Center for him we think is a fitting tribute.
View original post here:
Posted in Space Exploration
Comments Off on BACK TO THE MOON: Countdown and Launch Operations Start in the Rocco A. Petrone Launch Control Center at Kennedy Space Center – SpaceCoastDaily.com
These are the three important things women say would indicate financial independence – CNBC
Posted: at 2:45 am
Selects editorial team works independently to review financial products and write articles we think our readers will find useful. We earn a commission from affiliate partners on many offers, but not all offers on Select are from affiliate partners.
While the idea of financial freedom can mean different things to different people, a recent report by Bank of America pinpointed the top three areas many women say indicate financial independence.
To get the results, more than 3,500 women ages 22 and up were surveyed about their thoughts on financial confidence, especially when it comes to investing.
Here's a look at the top three indicators of financial independence, according to survey respondents, plus a few easy tips to help you meet those goals.
Subscribe to the Select Newsletter!
Our best selections in your inbox. Shopping recommendations that help upgrade your life, delivered weekly.Sign-up here.
For starters, 47% of respondents felt that being debt-free was a huge indicator of financial independence.
While some forms of debt such as a mortgage or student loan can buy you the flexibility to be able to afford an opportunity or acquire an asset, for many, the idea of actually owing money is enough to create a feeling of dread. A great deal of people are emotionally uncomfortable with debt, and those feelings of discomfort are reason enough to prioritize making their balances disappear.
Paying down debt also allows you a little more flexibility in the face of tough circumstances. For example, if your credit card limit was $5,000 and you were carrying a $4,500 balance, you would only have $500 left to float the cost of an unexpected car repair or roof leak if you didn't have an emergency fund to pull from. If, however, you were to pay off that balance, you would still have more room to cover a necessary expense if your emergency fund won't suffice.
There are many strategies out there when it comes to paying down debt. The popular debt snowball method involves eliminating the smallest debt balance first while paying just the minimum on your other debts. The idea is to work your way up to the largest balance until you're completely debt-free.
Another tactic, the debt avalanche method, involves eliminating your highest interest debt first while making minimum payments on the others, and working your way down to the debt with the lowest interest rate. This particular method will help you save the most on interest charges.
Debt consolidation is another strategy that can potentially help you save on interest charges while also organizing your debt into just one monthly payment. With this option, you're essentially using a debt consolidation loan, such as the Marcus by Goldman Sachs Personal Loan or the LightStream Personal Loan, to have your funds sent to each of your creditors to pay off those balances. After that point, you're just left paying back the debt consolidation loan you took out.
Another alternative is to use a balance transfer card with a 0% introductory APR period, such as the Citi Diamond Preferred Card which has a 0% intro APR on balance transfers for 21 monthsfrom date of first transfer, (15.24% -25.24% variable thereafter; there is a balance transfer fee of $5 or 5% of the amount of the transfer, whichever is greater and all transfers must be completed in the first 4 months) or the Chase Freedom Unlimited, which has a 0% intro APR for 15 months from account opening on balancetransfers, then a variable APR of16.49%-25.24%, to transfer a credit card balance with a high interest rate onto a new credit card that charges no interest fees for a limited time. The idea is the 0% introductory APR period will buy you enough time to have your entire monthly payment go toward the balance and not the interest, which should help you pay down your debt faster.
Emergencies are bound to pop up, which is why 39% of women who responded to the survey said being able to weather an unexpected expense was a sign of financial independence.
Having an emergency fund a lump sum of cash that you can access in the event of a dire need can help to offset these unforeseen expenses. For example, you could use money stashed in an emergency fund to replace a damaged car part, fix a leaky roof or pay a medical bill you weren't planning on.
Emergency funds can also help you make ends meet in the event you're laid off from a job with little to no notice. While unemployment benefits might help you to afford some of your daily expenses, those funds are generally not enough to cover your entire cost of living.
It's a good idea to keep your emergency fund in a relatively accessible account, such asMarcus by Goldman Sachs High Yield Online Savingsor anAlly Online Savings Account. With these high-yield savings accounts, you'll be paid interest on a monthly basis just for keeping a balance, helping to grow your emergency fund just a little quicker.
Experts typically recommend that you have an emergency fund with aboutthree to six months worth of living expenses, though the amount you should save is dependent on your individual situation and how much your monthly expenses usually end up being.
According to the survey, 34% of respondents said that not having to ask their families for financial assistance would make them feel more financially independent.
The rising cost of living, student loan debt and stagnating wages have made it tough for many people to keep up with everyday expenses sometimes, they have no choice but to turn to family to help bridge the gap between what they need and what they can actually afford.
While it's usually recommended that you simply find ways to cut back on spending to free up the cash for other expenses, with a highly inflationary environment like the one we're seeing right now, there may not be much room for individuals to cut back on spending more than they already are.
If you do find yourself hitting a wall with your cash flow, it might be time to consider asking for a raise at work or even switching to a higher paying job if you can. If you'd rather stay with your current company, try taking on a side hustle preferably one that you actually find enjoyable to help make ends meet.
If you choose to go the side hustle route, think about your skills and personal interests and try to find a side gig that works best for you. For example, if you have a knack for creating customized digital illustrations, think about selling them through a website such as Etsy.
While taking on extra work can be tiring, there are a few things you can try to mitigate burnout. For one, avoid doing side gigs that force you to use the same skills you're using for your day job. If you already work full-time as a writer, for instance, taking on an extra side hustle as a freelance writer can make it feel like complete writing overload. Consider using another skill you already have that you can monetize so you're not stuck doing too much of the same thing each day.
You should also think about how much time you realistically have to dedicate to a side hustle each week. If you can only spare 15 hours a week, you'll get stressed and burn out very quickly if you're pursuing a a side gig that's going to feel like another full-time job.
Catch up on Select's in-depth coverage ofpersonal finance,tech and tools,wellnessand more, and follow us onFacebook,InstagramandTwitterto stay up to date.
Editorial Note: Opinions, analyses, reviews or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the Select editorial staffs alone, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any third party.
Read more from the original source:
These are the three important things women say would indicate financial independence - CNBC
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on These are the three important things women say would indicate financial independence – CNBC
#392: Ask Paula: Did the Great Recession Lead to the FIRE Movement? – Afford Anything
Posted: at 2:45 am
Kevin wants to hit FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early) and believes his motivation comes from witnessing the financial trauma of the Great Recession. Hes wondering if others are motivated to reach FIRE for similar reasons.
Colleen and her husband own SEVEN paid off rental homes. Now theyre heading into retirement and disagree on what to do with some of that equity.
Anonymous wants to learn more about utilizing HSA accounts and Susan is curious about investing in tax liens.
My friend and former financial planner Joe Saul-Sehy joins me to answer these questions on todays episode. Enjoy!
Do you have a question on business, money, trade-offs, financial independence strategies, travel, or investing? Leave ithereand well answer them in a future episode.
Kevin asks (at 03:47 minutes): Ive given a lot of thought to my motivation for pursuing FIRE.
I believe one of the primary motivations resulted from me being a teenager during the Great Recession. I saw friends and family go through job instability, and some people even lose their homes. I wanted to have financial freedom so something like that doesnt happen to me and my family.
Ive noticed a lot of people who are interested in the FIRE movement are Millennials like myself, and some of them had similar trauma from the great recession.
Do you think many people pursue FIRE for similar reasons? If not, what are your thoughts on what motivates FIRE adherence?
Colleen asks (at 20:13 minutes): My husband and I own seven single-family rental homes, free and clear. Their value along with our personal residence is about $4 million.
We also have about $2.5 million in retirement savings invested in the S&P 500.
Given the massive increase in property values over the past few years, I would like to sell at least one rental house. With the one Im thinking of, we are making about $10,000 net annual cash flow, and I believe we would net about $400,000 after taxes and closing costs.
We could reinvest that $400,000 in a passive real estate fund that weve been invested with for several years, which pays out about 10% annually.
Then instead of $10,000, we could have closer to $40,000 in annual cash flow just from selling this one house.
Were about to retire at the end of 2022 so cash flow is very important. Also, were not interested in doing a cash-out refi because we are 100% debt free and we want to stay that way as we head into retirement.
My husband is hesitant to sell as he likes having a real asset that we have some control of, and he thinks values will likely increase in our area for many years to come. He says, Why should we sell cash flowing, appreciating real estate when we dont really need to? But I just keep thinking of that untapped equity.
Anonymous asks (at 30:54 minutes): I recently have been hearing about the advantages of opening an HSA, a health savings account.
Do you think it is a financially sound and wise decision to open one?
What are some of the advantages of HSAs and are there any tricks to maximize the benefits of an HSA account, like triple tax savings?
Susan asks (at 39:47 minutes): I read Rich Dad, Poor Dad, and then I read The 16% Rule.
Id really love to hear your opinion on tax lien investing and any sort of tips or advice that you may have.
Thanks to our sponsors!
KaChavaKaChava is loaded with over 70 superfoods and nutrients, like Maca Root, Chia Seeds, Sacha Inchi, Camu Camu, Maqui Berry, Aa, Coconut. KaChava is offering 10% OFF for the listeners of our podcast. Go toKaChavato get10% OFFyour order.
Mint MobileSaving money on your phone bill is easy with Mint Mobile they have plans starting as low as $15 per month, and all plans come with unlimited talk and text and high-speed data delivered on the largest 5G network. To get a new wireless plan for $15/month, including theModern Family Plan, go tomintmobile.com/paula.
Grove.coGrove makes shopping for natural products easy. Go to grove.co/paulato get afreegift set worth up to fifty dollars with your first order.
PolicygeniusGo topolicygenius.comfor free quotes and comparisons across more than 30 insurers. It only takes a few minutes to get started, and Policygenius could save you50% or moreon life insurance.
Link:
#392: Ask Paula: Did the Great Recession Lead to the FIRE Movement? - Afford Anything
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on #392: Ask Paula: Did the Great Recession Lead to the FIRE Movement? – Afford Anything
How to Build Real Wealth, According to What Kind of Spender You Are – Business Insider
Posted: at 2:45 am
There's tons of advice online about building wealth and retiring early, but it's hard to know which approach works best for your specific circumstances.
Kiersten and Julien Saunders, a couple who retired in their 40s and host the popular podcast rich & REGULAR, suggest finding out what kind of spender you are before creating your wealth-building plan.
In their new book, "Cashing Out: Win the Wealth Game by Walking Away," the couple explains that there are three different types of spenders.
In the book, the Saunderses say that understanding the true motivations fueling your current spending habits can help you choose a wealth-building plan that actually works for you.
The Saunderses point out that the financially insecure typically have difficult circumstances to navigate that make it harder for them to actually save and invest any money. "Because of this, they adopt a worldview based on the grim realities of life they experience every single day," the couple writes.
The financially insecure are more likely to equate their self-worth with their ability to perform well at work. They are always striving for higher-paying jobs, living paycheck to paycheck, and struggling to feel like they have enough.
To counteract the impulse to keep grinding hard at a 9-to-5 job, the Saunderses remind their readers that a salary is never going to outperform investing in the stock market.
The couple writes, "You must believe your income can work harder than you can. Instead of working for your money, you must adjust to managing your money so that it can multiply over time to serve your future wants and needs."
Of fast spenders, the couple writes, "Money both comes in and goes out at such a fast pace there's no time to build an emotional attachment to it and little incentive to try tracking it."
The couple writes about a friend of theirs who would rather go out for expensive drinks and indulge in luxury vacations instead of funding his retirement. "Plus, he believes that if he wantedto, he could start saving money tomorrow. The problem is, tomorrow never comes."
The book contains "richuals," simple guidelines that help readers change their relationship with money. A good "richual" for fast spenders is to track your income andhow you feel when you earn that money. The couple writes, "A dollar earned doing something you enjoy is always better than a dollar earned doing something you don't."
You will have about
$1,725,000
You will need about
$2,940,000
*Need is based on covering 70% of your annual pre-retirement income and a life expectancy of 100 years.
The Saunderses say that the financially insecure and the fast spenders are less common than the group they've named the middle. They write, "People in the middle often have enough income and are even saving for retirement, but they have no idea what they're saving for, how close or how far they are to achieving that goal, or why they're even doing it."
While their book speaks primarily to those in the middle, they recommend that all spending types create a distinct purpose for their income. The couple writes that income should first be used to gain security. Next comes flexibility to spend and save in alignment with your values. Then independence meaning, earning money is completely optional.
After achieving the first three purposes of money security, flexibility, and independence you can then use your income to achieve financial freedom.
For the financially insecure, financial freedom might be getting a better job or becoming free from a financial obligation. For the fast spender, it can be a state of emotional acceptance around your money, or selling a company that you built from the ground up.
For the middle, however, it can be hard to define what financial freedom actually looks like. This is why it's important to envision why you're trying to build wealth in the first place, and how you're going to assign purpose to your income to achieve those goals. The couple writes, "Financial freedom isn't a number; it's a feeling."
Read this article:
How to Build Real Wealth, According to What Kind of Spender You Are - Business Insider
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on How to Build Real Wealth, According to What Kind of Spender You Are – Business Insider
Enjoy a comfortable retirement with right planning and preparation – Jamaica Observer
Posted: at 2:45 am
Keeping all your money in savings is a dangerous bet against inflation, since the purchasing power of that money decreases as inflation rises.
LIKE most people her age, a 63-year-old educator is looking forward to retirement after spending almost 40 years in the classroom.
The veteran educator, who asked that her name be withheld, is dreaming of "simpler days".
"Retirement is something I have been looking forward to for the past few years. My husband and I have been planning for it and one of our biggest dreams is to travel," she revealed.
But despite her plans, she admitted that she has been having second thoughts, as the recent price increases and the economic uncertainties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have made retirement seem like an unattainable goal.
"Honestly, I've been worried. From the pandemic hit, I have been wondering if I will be able to go through with my plans of retirement and now the rapid price increases have made matters even worse," the Clarendon resident said.
"We're spending thousands of dollars more than we used to each month, just on simple things like food and gas. Life has gotten considerably harder in the two years. I worry if I'll have enough savings to live comfortably, if I retire in the next year or so."
Dr Ransford Davidson, business relationship and sales manager, JN Bank, says it's natural that retirees and those soon to retire are worried about inflation and the impact rising prices will have on their retirement savings.
"It's not hard to understand how inflation can be a daunting prospect for retirees. Even in normal times, anyone who's planning for retirement or is already retired worries about running out of money," pointed out Dr Davidson. "The potential for rising prices only adds to that baseline of anxiety. Even for people with the best-laid plans, inflation is an uncontrollable factor that complicates retirement planning."
Dr Davidson noted that while seniors might be concerned about their future, they can still enjoy a comfortable retirement with the right amount of planning and preparation.
With that in mind, he provides five ways retirees can navigate inflation:
Review your budget
Seniors must ensure they adjust their budgets to account for the rise in prices. This way, they can see how much they're spending and where they may need to cut back. For instance, scaling back on unnecessary driving can help cut down on gas costs. When food shopping it may mean buying less meat and more vegetables, or going to the market for produce instead of the supermarket. Comparison shopping can also help persons save money.
Keep your portfolio balanced
Diversify your investments. Having a mixture of cash, stocks, bonds and other assets is key. "Keeping all your money in savings is a dangerous bet against inflation, since the purchasing power of that money decreases as inflation rises," Dr Davidson said. To ensure you can sustain your financial independence in retirement, consider dividend-paying stocks, growth stocks and real estate. These are assets that are going to fluctuate in the short term, but they are designed over a longer period to give retirees diversification and protection against inflation risk.
Get rid of debts
Many senior citizens are still straddled with debt, including mortgages, credit card and even car loans. This debt will be an anchor as inflation rises. That's why paying off or paying down debt should be top priority for anyone worried about late-in-life inflation.
Keep working in retirement
If possible, keep earning. "Every dollar earned is a dollar you don't have to spend. Your biggest hedge against inflation is your human capital. That doesn't mean you have to stay employed at a job that is stressful or that you were looking forward to leaving," Dr Davidson advised. He said seniors can scale down to part-time jobs, tutoring or consulting. "You can even change industries all together and pursue a venture you've always been interested in."
Talk to a financial advisor
Finally, Dr Davidson said seniors should seek out the knowledge of experts in the financial field to ensure they're armed with the relevant information to make the right decisions. "You don't have to figure this out alone. There are experts who are willing and able to assist you to work out a retirement plan that's right for you and to help you hedge against inflation or any other economic shock on the horizon."
When food shopping it may mean buying less meat and more vegetables, or going to the market for produce instead of the supermarket.
DAVIDSON... it's not hard to understand how inflation can be a daunting prospect for retirees
See more here:
Enjoy a comfortable retirement with right planning and preparation - Jamaica Observer
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on Enjoy a comfortable retirement with right planning and preparation – Jamaica Observer
A Newcomers Perspective On Toxic Bitcoin Maximalism – Bitcoin Magazine
Posted: at 2:45 am
This is an opinion editorial by Boomer, a long-time and active member of the financial independence/retire early (FIRE) movement and a contributor for Bitcoin Magazine.
I was recently inspired after reading Tomer Strolights piece, Bitcoiners Are Not Toxic They Have Integrity.
For context, I read it a few days after Nic Carters situation really exploded on Twitter, and Strolights article really resonated with me. To be clear, I have a great deal of respect for Carter and all the good work hes done for the Bitcoin community, especially the work hes done to debunk the energy fear, uncertainty and doubt out there. Like him or hate him, he really is one of the most important voices Bitcoin has in the energy and mining space. Over the past few weeks, hes been taking it on the chin from many people in the community for investments in blockchain and crypto companies through his venture capital investment firm, Castle Island Ventures. In his defense, hes been very transparent about his investments in these projects, talking about them quite openly on his On The Brink podcast for at least a year. In retaliation to the criticism, Carter has written a few articles and appeared on a few podcasts where hes punched back at the critics, calling out a vocal group in the Bitcoin space known as toxic Bitcoin Maximalists or derogatorily toxic maxis. I dont intend to go over exactly what was said about him or what he said back, but the whole thing has gotten pretty ugly. In this humble plebs opinion, it feels childish. It might be a symptom of the bear market that people in Bitcoin are turning on each other, or maybe its the Bitcoin immune system doing its job.
Over the past week, Ive been thinking about what the terms toxicity and maximalism mean to me. Ive purposely held back from reading too much on the topic because I want to make sure that I get to my conclusions on my own, but I know that there have been quite a few pieces on the topic recently. Pete Rizzo, Stephan Livera, and John Vallis have all written articles on maximalism over the past few days, and Im looking forward to reading them, but I want to get my own thoughts out there first. I have been listening to my regular rotation of podcasts and Ive heard pretty much every Bitcoin podcaster give their two sats on Carter, maximalists and toxicity. Id like to give a shoutout to Joey and Len from The Canadian Bitcoiners Podcast for discussing Carters recent spat with the maximalists in a way that I felt summed up the situation well. They get into it at the end of the episode.
When I first started my journey into Bitcoin, Elon Musk was in the middle of pumping dogecoin. I remember the mainstream medias fascination with the whole thing. Musk even hosted Saturday Night Live! It all seemed playful to me and it made sense. Musk is this future-centric tech CEO, and I knew that Tesla had put some bitcoin on its balance sheet. Bitcoin, ethereum, dogecoin it was all similar to me at the time, and Musk seemed to fit in perfectly. I remember listening to Bitcoin podcasts that were very critical of Musk, and it confused me. Any publicity is good publicity, isnt it? A lot of the Bitcoiners I was following were really upset over what this guy was doing, and I just didnt get it. I guess this was my first taste of Bitcoins toxic culture, not that I thought much about it. I wasnt ready. I was too busy learning.
Strolight wrote his article around the same time that Musk was hosting Saturday Night Live. It was before I was ready to understand it all, so Im thankful to have stumbled upon it now. It really motivated me to do a personal exploration into how I define maximalism.
Im nowhere near done in this exploration and it might be something that I ponder for a long time. Im still way too new here to have a fully formed opinion on what toxic Bitcoin Maximalism really is, but I know enough now to have a grasp on how Bitcoin continues to shape me and how important it is. Bitcoin means different things for everyone, so it only makes sense that Bitcoin Maximalism is just as personal. I truly believe that in Bitcoin weve discovered the greatest form of money ever and with this discovery, we have the potential to realign many (if not most) of the perverse incentives that plague this world. To me, this belief is Bitcoin Maximalism. Does standing up for that make someone a toxic Maximalist? I guess it depends on your perspective.
Generally speaking, Bitcoiners are leaders: type-A personalities that arent exactly the most politically correct group of people. What we are is a group of sovereign individuals guided by truth, transparency and a belief in a protocol that doesnt have time for bullshit. Of course, we can come off as toxic! Does that really surprise anyone!? There is a difference between being toxic and being an asshole, though. Some of the things Ive read on Twitter coming from defenders of Bitcoin are flat out rude, intolerant and childish. Slinging insults in the name of Bitcoin doesnt make you a maximalist, and it doesnt make you a hero, either. Stop that shit. It isnt helping. But if youre calling a spade a spade, that isnt toxic. And if youre offended by someone being toxic by defending something they believe in, maybe youre the toxic one.
Bitcoin is for everyone. And while there are no gatekeepers, maybe theres a need for protectors. Maximalism is that protection. Bitcoin Maximalists have to fight off threats, and there certainly are a lot of threats out there. Maybe maximalists need to be toxic since Bitcoin is itself, perfectly pure. Maybe Gigi is right and toxicity equals love. It's been said many times before, but I believe that the toxic maximalists serve as Bitcoins immune system. Like a biological organism, sometimes the immune system can go too far and kill off healthy cells from time to time, but it does so to protect the organism. A degree of toxicity is needed because if were not toxic enough, then shitcoins, scammers and fiat bloodsuckers will run rampant. But if were too toxic, well waste our energy fighting among ourselves and well alienate people who are looking on with curiosity. While no degree of toxicity will ever kill Bitcoin, an overly toxic environment could certainly slow down its adoption. Its a fine line to walk, and every Bitcoiner needs to find where they fit in, but we dont need to all agree on where that line truly is.
I know that Nic Carter has studied Bitcoin in more depth and for longer than I have. He knows that bitcoin isnt just an investment tool or an asset class. He knows just how important the discovery was. That being said, he should be allowed to invest in as many blockchain companies as he chooses to, but hes going to be held to a higher standard than some newbie, and he should expect that. He shouldnt be surprised (or triggered) when people call him out on it. Is this a case of the immune system attacking a healthy cell? Im not sure.
Personally, I find myself getting more and more convinced about Bitcoin by the day. I suppose my maximalism is growing and I find myself being less and less tolerant, but you still wont find me hurling insults on Twitter. Thats not who I am, but I reserve the right to be as toxic as I need to be. And you know what? You dont have to like it. We all have a role to play in this Bitcoin world. If I can eventually become the not-so-toxic Bitcoin Maximalist, thats a role Id be honored to serve, but to all the toxic maximalists out there, keep up the good work. Growth only comes from discomfort, and every time your toxicity makes someone uncomfortable, it helps someone else along their journey. Keep calling out bullshit as you see it.
This is a guest post by Boomer. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.
More here:
A Newcomers Perspective On Toxic Bitcoin Maximalism - Bitcoin Magazine
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on A Newcomers Perspective On Toxic Bitcoin Maximalism – Bitcoin Magazine
Generational success: 6 in 10 think they’ll build enough wealth to pass to their kids – Study Finds
Posted: at 2:45 am
NEW YORK Six in 10 Americans believe they can build generational wealth.A recent survey of 2,000 U.S. adults, half of whom are homeowners, finds that 63 percent are confident they can accumulate property, investments, or other things with monetary value that they can pass down to the next generation.
Of those respondents, nearly three-quarters (74%) believe theyve already built generational wealth. However, homeownership isnt the only way to do so: more people who live with their parents or family and dont pay rent (83%) and renters (75%) feel they have already built generational wealth in comparison to homeowners (72%).
So, whats the most popular wealth-generating tool among homeowners? Making improvements to increase the value of a home (26%) tops the list. In comparison, 38 percent of those who dont own a home and currently live in student housing are turning to extreme savings and investment programs like Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE), or subletting part of their primary residence (38%).
Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of HomeLight, the survey also looked into other avenues for generational wealth building, including peoples plans to fund continuing education and business ventures.
To help with tuition expenses, 30 percent will take out a traditional loan through their bank or credit card. Those who live rent-free with their parents are more likely than homeowners to cash in their investments (36% vs. 23%), take out a traditional loan (41% vs. 24%), and use money theyve already saved (36% vs. 22%). People who plan to start a business in the next three to five years will take out a traditional loan (34%) or invest their savings (30%) in it.
Respondents also shared how they plan to finance upsizing their home or apartment. Despite the volatility of todays market, more than a third (34%) plan to upsize in the next three to five years, helping pay for it by cashing in investments (46%), taking out a loan (45%), and using money theyve saved up (45%).
Overall, the study proves that privilege pays off, and that those with access to family support and the foundation of generational wealth are already on the path toward accruing wealth. The survey shows that 77 percent of people currently living with family plan to inherit a home. Compared to homeowners, those who live with family without paying rent were also more likely to inherit a larger home to live in (46% vs. 33%) and borrow money from family or friends to afford their own home (42% vs. 28%).
The most expensive regions in the U.S. the Northeast and the West report the lowest homeownership rates, yet the highest numbers of those planning to inherit a home, at 63 percent and 57 percent, respectively. Overall, about two-thirds (64%) of millennials expect to inherit a home.
Despite changes in the market, homeownership continues to be one of the most surefire ways to build generational wealth in the U.S. Home equity surged to a record $27.8 trillion in Q1, but rising interest rates and costs of living have started to curb demand for home buying, says Vanessa Famulener, President of HomeLight Homes, in a statement. Those who have built up equity in their homes can take advantage of numerous tax, repayment, and interest rate benefits that home equity lending offers homeowners especially to help bring costs down for value-add home improvements.
One in three homeowners have plans to sell their current home, more than those who plan to live in it until they pass it down to their kids (20%). Fifty-seven percent are confident in their understanding of todays housing market, including more millennials than baby boomers (60% vs. 49%) and 47 percent of people 77 and older.
However, less than half (45%) are confident theyll sell their home at its highest value, with those in the West feeling the least confident (33%).
Beyond renovations, home equity loans and lines of credit offer an alternative to high-interest credit cards and personal loans for borrowers, but if youre reinvesting your homes equity in something else, its important to consider the collateral risk, Famulener adds. Investment properties are popular among those with equity in their homes one in five homeowners said they would use a home equity loan or line of credit on their primary home to invest in a single-family residence to rent out.
Link:
Generational success: 6 in 10 think they'll build enough wealth to pass to their kids - Study Finds
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on Generational success: 6 in 10 think they’ll build enough wealth to pass to their kids – Study Finds
Wisconsin Women’s Business Initiative Corporation: $15 Million veteran loan fund closes its first round with support from Wells Fargo -…
Posted: at 2:45 am
MILWAUKEE, WI TheVeteran Loan Fundannounced this week that it has raised $15 million to support current and aspiring veteran entrepreneurs, including seed funding fromWells Fargo. The Veteran Loan Fund is a collaborative effort by a national network of Specialized Service Organizations and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) focused on providing affordable capital and technical assistance to veteran entrepreneurs.
Were so grateful to Wells Fargo for providing funding to continue the important support to veterans that the Veteran Loan Fund provides, says Wisconsin Womens Business Initiative Corporation (WWBIC) President and Chief Visionary Officer Wendy K. Baumann. WWBIC is honored to provide development services to veterans as the Veterans Business Outreach Center for Wisconsin, Illinois and Minnesota and the Veteran Loan Fund helps us to assist even more veteran business owners in our area.
Lack of access to capital, formal business training or a network of peers are often roadblocks for veterans who aim to attain financial independence through entrepreneurship. The goal of the Veteran Loan Fund is to fill this gap. Veterans receiving loans from this program benefit from free access to a national network of business coaches and loans with low interest rates.
National technical assistance partners include Bunker Labs, Vet Met and Vet to CEO. Local partners include Veteran Business Outreach Centers, SCORE and SBDCs. Capital providers (CDFIs) include Access to Capital For Entrepreneurs (GA), Black Business Investment Fund (FLA), Business Impact Northwest (WA, OR), Colorado Enterprise Fund (CO), Dream Spring (NM), Economic and Community Development Institute (OH), Pathway Lending (TN, AL, KY), PeopleFund managing member (TX), Pursuit formerly Excelsior Growth Fund (NJ, NY, PA), and WWBIC in Wisconsin.
Wells Fargo support to the Veteran Loan Fund includes a $3.5 million investment and a $1.5 million grant to make it possible for the CDFIs to provide affordable loans to eligible veterans and for the fund to break even. Since the launch of the fund, member CDFIs have deployed more than $10.5 million in loans, creating more than 500 jobs and providing 2,200 hours of free technical assistance.
The estimated annual demand for capital from veteran entrepreneurs that do not receive any kind of funding for their businesses is $100 million. The Veteran Loan Fund plans to close this gap within five years.
Entrepreneurship can be a very satisfying career path as people transition out of the military, but veterans need more access to capital and expertise to operationalize their business plans, said Jenny Flores, head of small business growth philanthropy at Wells Fargo. We support the Veteran Loan Funds vision for a more inclusive economy and are proud to offer seed funding for this national effort to boost veteran-owned businesses.
Veteran Loan Fund loan recipients in Wisconsin will be complemented by the services of theVeterans Business Outreach Center (VBOC)at WWBIC. VBOC is designed to provide entrepreneurial development services such as business training, counseling, and resource partner referrals to transitioning service members, veterans, National Guard & Reserve members, and military spouses interested in starting or growing a small business. VBOCis funded in part by a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Small Business Administration.For more information on VBOC, go towwbic.com/veteransor contact Wisconsin VBOC Co-DirectorDan Newberry.
For more information on the Veteran Loan Fund, please visitveteranloanfund.com. For details on applying locally for a loan through the Veteran Loan Fund, go towwbic.com/loansor contact WWBIC Director of LendingMichael Hetzel.
###
View original post here:
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on Wisconsin Women’s Business Initiative Corporation: $15 Million veteran loan fund closes its first round with support from Wells Fargo -…
Out of the Shadows: Violence Against Women who Love Women – Groundviews
Posted: at 2:44 am
Photo courtesy ofHuman Rights Watch
Earlier this month, a news report revealed that a 22 year old woman had filed a complaint with the Human Rights Commission against the Welisara-Mahabage police. She alleged that her parents had subjected her to severe abuse after learning that she was a lesbian and in a consensual, same-sex relationship. She was locked up in her house for several weeks and taken to several Catholic priests in an attempt to convert her into heterosexuality. According to the news report, one of the priests had advised her parents to force her into a marriage and take away her financial independence to cure her.
With the help of a friend, she had manged to make the police aware about her situation, but the tables turned when she was brought into the station. After her parents informed the police that she was being confined due her sexual orientation, the police illegally confiscated her personal belongings and attempted to subject her to physical examinations against her will. Her lawyers from iProbono said that the police attempted to subject her to a psychiatric evaluation as well as a physical examination by a Judicial Medical Officer in order to prove that she suffered a mental illness as a result of her sexual orientation.
This is not an isolated incident. In the wake of Pride celebrations last month, the Sunday Times reported that a lesbian couple had been arrested by the Akkaraipattu Police due to their sexual orientation. It was revealed that one of the women was from India and she was attempting to help her partner migrate to India so they could get married. They were arrested when the father of the Sri Lankan woman lodged a complaint against them at the police. Subsequently, the court ordered the two women to be sent to the Kalmunai Base Hospital for a psychiatric evaluation.
Research and anecdotal evidence show that women who love women (including lesbians, bisexual women, transgender women and queer women) are often subject to discrimination, harassment and violence at home, workplaces and public spaces due to their sexual orientation. Families often try to subject them to conversion therapies (both by medical and religious means) and/or force them into heterosexual marriages to turn them straight. It is difficult to keep track of and document these incidents as often they happen behind closed doors. Nevertheless, coercion into unwanted marriages happen with alarming regularity as families see marriage as a way to avoid the stigma attached to victims sexuality. Often, their financial independence is also taken away by forcing them to quit their jobs and not allowing them to leave the home, resulting in the victims unable to seek help. And in instances legal help is sought, the police often invoke Section 365 and 365A of the Penal Code to arrest the victims and harass them further, even forcefully subjecting them to psychiatric evaluations and physical examinations.
The current legal and social context
Sri Lankan society is structured on strict gender roles and responsibilities where anything that strays from heteronormative and binary gender standards is considered abnormal, deviant and deserving of punishment/discrimination. Due to Sri Lankas colonial past, same sex sexual relations between consenting adults are criminalised by Sections 365 and 365A of the Penal Code, which states that carnal intercourse against the order of nature (in other words, any type of sex that is considered unnatural) and acts of gross indecency are criminal offences punishable by law, carrying a sentence of up to 10 years. In 1995, human rights activists attempted to repeal the Penal Code but instead of decriminalising same sex sexual relations between consenting adults, the amendment substituted the word males in the original legal text with the gender-neutral term people, thereby criminalising same-sex sexual activity between women as well.
Statistics by Human Dignity Trust (HDT) show that Sri Lanka is one of 70 countries that criminalises private, consensual, same-sex sexual activity. It is also one of 42 countries that criminalises private, consensual sexual activity between women using laws against lesbianism, sexual relations with a person of the same sex and gross indecency.
However, it is important to note that while Sections 365 and 365A can be interpreted to criminalise same-sex sexual relations, they do not criminalise diverse sexual orientations and gender identities/expressions. In other words, it is not a crime to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and/or queer in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan authorities, particularly the Attorney Generals Department, have on multiple occasions assured to international bodies that the constitution implicitly grants equal rights to LGBTIQ persons and protects them against discrimination.
Nonetheless, it is not surprising that these legal and cultural biases against queer people, especially queer women, have bled into all facets of society including the medical and mental health professions.
Conversion or corrective therapy
Last year, EQUAL GROUND received a complaint from a gay man in his mid-twenties, who sought treatment at a mental health clinic in a state run hospital. The psychiatrist who was supposed to treat his mental health issues reprimanded him, claiming that homosexuality was unnatural and it was the cause of all his problems. He went on to pressure Kamal to change himself if he wants to be helped and claimed that no medical professional in the world would be able to assist him with his mental health issues if he continued to be gay.
It is common for certain hospitals and clinics in Sri Lanka to provide conversion or corrective therapy the pseudoscientific practice of trying to change an individuals sexual orientation and gender identity from LGBT to straight (heterosexual). For instance, Suwasevana Hospitals (Pvt) Ltd in Kandy lists homosexuality and transvestitism as conditions that can be treated with its medical hypnosis service.
While Sri Lanka continues to marginalise its LGBTIQ population, global psychiatry and medical bodies have largely accepted that diverse sexual orientations and gender identities/expressions are not mental or physical illnesses. The Diagnostic Statistics Manual (DSM) published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) what is considered the standard classification of mental disorders removed the diagnosis of homosexuality from its second edition (DSM II) in 1973 nearly 50 years ago. Further, the World Medical Association (WMA) has strongly emphasised that homosexuality does not represent a disease, but a normal variation within the realm of human sexuality. Meanwhile, the World Health Organisations (WHO), International Classification of Diseases (ICD) removed homosexuality from its list of diseases in 1990 and states that sexual orientation by itself is not to be considered a disorder (ICD 10); in 2018, it announced that being transgender is no longer considered a mental disorder in its latest ICD, published in 2019 (ICD 11). Other prominent mental health organisations have also affirmed that homosexuality and being transgender/gender-variant are not mental disorders or illnesses.
Even the Sri Lanka College of Psychiatrists (SLCP), the countrys main medical body on mental health and psychiatry, last year stated that it does not consider homosexuality a mental illness and called for its decriminalisation. The Sri Lanka College of Psychiatrists would like to categorically state that we do not endorse the view that homosexuality is due to a disease of the mind or body, it said. Modern day psychiatrists do not identify or diagnose homosexuality as a mental illness or treat it as such. This myth that homosexuality is a mental illness is not in keeping with the evidence-based science practiced by our membership, the SLCP added. We would like to strongly urge the authorities to change article 365 of the penal code which states that homosexuality is a criminal act. This archaic law should be abolished and homosexuality decriminalised in Sri Lanka, the statement said.
Since non-heteronormative sexual orientations and gender identities are not considered as mental or physical illnesses or a disorder, there is nothing to cure or correct. In other words, all sexual orientations and gender identities/expressions are natural and valid. Conversion and correction therapies are considered pseudoscientific practices and are widely discredited in the medical field. Also, there are no credible scientific studies that prove that conversion therapy is effective in any way. Mainstream international medical bodies have acknowledged the potential harm and ineffectiveness of such therapies/cures. For instance, in 1998, the American Psychiatric Association listed depression, anxiety, and self-destructive behaviour as some of the key risks of such corrective/conversion therapies. In fact, the United Nations (UN) has stated that such practices can amount to torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishments.
Earlier this year, Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) MP, Rohini Kaviratne, tabled a private members motion to ban conversion therapies by unregistered clinics in Sri Lanka. However, there has been no updates on its implementation or the next steps so far.
CEDAW ruling on Sections 365 and 365A
In March this year, in a landmark decision, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) committee found that the criminalisation of consensual, same-sex relations between women in Sri Lanka is a human rights violation. The decision was in a case brought by Rosanna Flamer-Caldera to at the UN, with the support of the Human Dignity Trust (HDT), and sets a major legal precedent, holding that the criminalisation of lesbian and bisexual women violates the Convention.
The CEDAW Committee said that section 365A of the Penal Code of 1883 (amended in 1995) that criminalises same sex sexual relations between consenting adults compounds discrimination against women in Sri Lanka, and as such, violates lesbian and bisexual womens right to non-discrimination under article 2 (a) and (d)(g) of the Convention. It also noted that that decriminalisation of consensual same-sex relations is essential to prevent and protect against violence, discrimination and harmful gender stereotyping.
As such, the CEDAW committee urged the government to decriminalise same-sex sexual relations. It also asked Sri Lanka to take measures to protect women against gender-based violence by adopting comprehensive legislation against discrimination against lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women, and provide adequate protection, support systems and remedies, including reparation, to lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women who are victims of discrimination. Further recommendations included ensuring victims of gender-based violence including lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women have access to effective civil and criminal remedies and protection, including counselling, health services and financial services, addressing workplace discrimination against LBTI women and providing sensitisation training to law enforcement agencies.
Research has shown that globally, LGBTIQ persons experience much higher rates of depression, anxiety and other mental illnesses, even leading to self-harm and suicide in certain instances as a result of the daily traumas they go through. In this context, discrimination and harassment by families, authorities, as well as medical professionals, especially those working in the field of mental health, cause irreparable harm to LGBTIQ persons. As they are unable to get the help they need, they are forced to live in the shadows, often at the cost of their mental and physical wellbeing. Therefore, it is high time for the government of Sri Lanka to remove oppressive laws and practices against the LGBTIQ community and grant them their basic human rights.
To obtain EQUAL GROUNDs Counselling Services, visit https://www.facebook.com/EGcounsellinghotline/ or call +94-11-4334277 (LB women), +94-11-4334278 (Transgender Persons), +94-11-4334279 (General).
See the article here:
Out of the Shadows: Violence Against Women who Love Women - Groundviews
Posted in Financial Independence
Comments Off on Out of the Shadows: Violence Against Women who Love Women – Groundviews