The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: June 9, 2022
Background Press Call by a Senior Administration Official on the Vice President’s Engagements Regarding Root Causes of Migration – The White House
Posted: June 9, 2022 at 4:49 am
Via Teleconference(June 6, 2022)
5:19 P.M. EDT MODERATOR: Thanks, everyone, for joining us. This briefing is to preview the Vice Presidents engagements tomorrow Tuesday, June 7th in Los Angeles related to her work addressing the root causes of migration.
I would just note, as many of you are aware, there is another background briefing at 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, which will cover other issues related to the Summit of the Americas, which I know many are interested in. But again, this briefing is about the Vice Presidents engagements regarding root causes.
This briefing is on background, attributed to senior administration officials. The contents will be embargoed until Tuesday, June 7th, 5:00 a.m. Eastern Time, 2:00 p.m. [a.m.] Pacific Time. And by joining this call, youre agreeing to these ground rules.
Following the call, well also be sending you some factsheets to support the announcements that the Vice President will be making. They are also embargoed until Tuesday, June 7th at 5:00 a.m. Eastern, 2:00 a.m. Pacific Time.
And for your awareness today, our speaker is [senior administration official], who will hereinafter be referred to as senior administration official.
And before I hand it over to him, I would just like to preview what we already put out publicly, but to recap the Vice Presidents schedule for tomorrow, Tuesday, in Los Angeles.
First, shell deliver remarks at a womens economic empowerment event hosted by the Chamber of Commerce and the Partnership for Central America.
She will host a roundtable with women leaders, including women business executives, entrepreneurs, and civil society.
And third, she will host a roundtable with business executives as part of her call to action in partnership with the private sector.
With that, I will turn it over to senior administration official number one. Thanks.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Thank you, [moderator]. And thanks, everybody, for joining.
Before I dive into some of the specific announcements of this week, let me just take a step back and give you some context for the Vice Presidents approach to this set of issues.
As you all know, the Vice President leads our administrations implementation of the strategy to address root causes of migration from Central America a strategy that we launched last summer. And this week is a real opportunity for her to continue to drive this process under her leadership.
The focus of that strategy is addressing endemic issues in the countries of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras issues such as poverty and corruption and gender-based violence, which are the causes of migration.
The Vice Presidents theory of the case in approaching this and at the center of this strategy is that people dont want to leave their homes.Andif you can help provide them hope and opportunity, particularly economic opportunity, theres a greater chance that they will remain there.
Weve acknowledged all along that the drivers of migration from Central America and elsewhere are long-term issues that cant be resolved quickly. But we think that we have been tackling them and are seeing real progress in our efforts.
When the Vice President began her work on this issue, she recognized that governments were important, but we also had to engage the private sector and civil society. And she believes that governments cant solve these problems alone.
So as part of that process, she launched the call to action in May 2021, in which she challenged and encouraged companies to invest in the region and help provide those economic opportunities and support the sort of long-term development in the region that would provide opportunity and hope for people to stay home.
Thats the context in which the call-to-action work shes doing in Los Angeles this week takes place. And let me roll out some of what she is able to announce this week.
Youll remember last December, when the Vice President held a roundtable with some business executives, she announced that we had galvanized $1.2 billion of commitments for the region.
Tomorrow, we will announce and youll get this factsheet that the Vice President has galvanized a total of more than $3.2 billion of investments for the region from 40 different companies and organizations.
So, this total includes more than $1.9 billion in new investments that were going to announce tomorrow from 10 new companies. And I just underscore: These, we think, are pretty sizable direct investments in economies the size of the three countries in question, and they will be responsible for creating tens of thousands of jobs.
Again, well get you a factsheet and all of the details, but just to give you a sense of what Im talking about, it includes $150 million from the Gap to increase its sourcing from Central America. Another apparel company, SanMar, will invest $500 million in the region, generating 4,000 additional jobs. Theres $700 million from Millicom, a telecommunications company thats going to expand its mobile and broadband networks in the region, and $270 million from Visa to expand financial inclusion and digital infrastructure.
And I particularly stress in the context of these announcements you know, the last two, which expand broadband and financial inclusion and banking opportunities for people, really help make this project part of creating an ecosystem of opportunity. Its not just the direct jobs that are created by these investments, but jobs in areas that help people thrive and succeed economically.
The Vice President believes that we need to not just offer an individual a job but address the full spectrum of needs and support individuals in the different facets of their lives. And thats what this project is all about: trying to help individuals move up the economic ladder and not just have a job but also have access to information technology, banking system, and infrastructure that creates that positive ecosystem.
So we feel like, in the call to action, weve created an innovative public partner public-private partnership model where companies and organizations and governments can work together and build off of each others work. And thats what the Vice President will be discussing in a number of roundtables with business executives and others throughout the week.
Shes also going to be discussing other elements of our strategy, which we think make the investment climate even more attractive to these companies. Im talking about combating corruption, promoting rule of law, reducing violence, and, in particular, empowering women, about which I can say a little bit more now.
But I just want to underscore that we believe, and the strategy last summer articulates this comprehensively, that you need all of these pillars better governance, anti-corruption, rule of law, reducing violence, empowering women going hand-in-hand with the job creation to have the long-term effect that were looking for.
So, I mentioned some specific initiatives in the space of empowering women, which the Vice President feels strongly about. And tomorrow, shell announce further initiatives in this area. Again, well send you a factsheet.
But shell be announcing new commitments from the United States government and the private sector to support womens economic empowerment and reduce gender-based violence in the region.
Some of the companies involved in the call to action, who have all stressed the importance of womens empowerment for economic reasons, among others, are coming together for a new initiative called In Her Hands, where companies and organizations are making commitments to empower, train, and protect women.
Taken together, these private sector commitments will connect more than 1.4 million women and their communities to the financial system and digital economy, accelerate womens participation in the agro industry, train more than 500,000 women and girls in core job skills, promote gender parity, and elevate women within the companies across the region.
Additionally, shell be announcing some U.S. government initiatives and funding, including efforts to address gender-based violence, which goes hand-in-hand with their economic empowerment.
So, tomorrow, the Vice President will speak to these initiatives and their importance. She will make clear the case that when a woman has access to economic opportunities and is safe and secure, its not just good for the individual, its good for her children, her family, her community, and our entire hemisphere.
Her central message in all this is that when women succeed, all of society benefits. Thats what she has told the companies that we and organizations weve been working with, and thats what shes heard from them as well.
Shes prioritized this work as part of the Root Causes Strategy, and we are really pleased to see so many organizations and companies join us in lifting up women in Central America.
Lastly, let me just mention that the Vice President will also launch an initiative called the Central American Service Corps.This is a $50 million initiative that will be administered by USAID. We will provide young people in northern Central America with paid community service opportunities. They will engage on local priorities, such as education and tutoring, climate action, food security, health services, and violence prevention. This will help them with life and job skills and, we believe, further help address the root causes of migration.
This initiative began as a pilot project in response to the call to action by our private sector and philanthropic philanthropic partners. And we are pleased that we are now able to dedicate U.S. government resources to scale it up.
It really is and Ill end with this a good example of how the public and private sectors can go hand-in-hand and work together and create the sort of synergies we think we need to be successful in this area.
So thanks for listening to that, sort of, summary. And I think well be happy to take a couple of questions.
MODERATOR: Yeah, if our operator could re-up the instructions to get in the queue that would be great.
Q Hi, everybody. Given that the Vice President is focused on the Northern Triangle, I wanted to see if any Northern Triangle leaders are going to be going to the summit, and if not, what that says about her efforts to engage with them.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yeah, thanks. What we can confirm is that the countries of what youre calling the Northern Triangle, northern Central America Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador will be represented at the summit and will fully participate in the summit. They are sending delegations.
Youve heard from the leaders of those countries. And well leave them to speak for themselves about whether their leaders themselves are going to come. Thats a call for them to make. Some of them have said that they arent going to come, but they also have confirmed that they will be sending delegations.
So we consider them the participants in the summit. Each of them had a different reason for the leader him or herself potentially not coming. But it doesnt undermine any of what I wrote out in terms of our approach to the region.
Obviously, we do work with and need to work with governments, and we do so where we can. But at the same time, were consistent with our principles.
I mentioned earlier how central anti-corruption and good governance was to making this effort work, and were not going to shy away from standing firm on those principles. And indeed, you know, he was standing firm on principles, such as inviting just democratic countries to participate in the summit and pursuing anti-corruption efforts, that may be the reason that particular leaders choose not to come. And we have nothing to apologize for in standing for those principles.
But going back to what I laid out in terms of our efforts to create economic opportunity (inaudible) hope, youll see that (inaudible) weve been, I think, remarkably successful in generating public-private partnership and private sector interest in these countries, and its having real results.
Q Hey, guys. Thanks for doing this call. I want to piggyback off of that last question for a second, because so I know the President of Honduras, Castro they announced on Saturday that they would be sending the Foreign Minister, but whether or not shes attending, its still (inaudible).
I wonder if the Vice President is at all disappointed that you guys dont know whether the President, Castro who, you know, she obviously talked to in late May is coming; whether you guys expect a phone call to happen in the next few days with either her or the Guatemalan President, since those are the two countries, out of the three, that Harris has talked to the most.
And as the President of Mexico is not coming, but we know that hes going to be headed to the White House next month, can we expect any type of travel either on the Vice Presidents side or on either of those two leaders sides to the U.S. in, kind of, the same fashion if they dont make it?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Sure. Thanks for all of that. Just on the last thing: I dont have any travel to announce, but Im happy to address the three countries that you mentioned.
And Im glad you started with Honduras. And I think the President of Honduras herself has said that she didnt plan to come, and the reason that she it was that she believes all countries in the region should be invited. And, you know, mainly thats a reference to Cuba, which was not included.
The Vice President has a good relationship with the new President I say new; its been over 100 days now of Honduras. She went to her inauguration. She supports her efforts to support democracy and, indeed, fight anti-corruption the issue I mentioned a minute ago.
But like I said, President Biden took a decision not to invite Cuban participation. This is a longstanding principle, in fact, of the Summit of the Americas which and I think the third summit in 2001, in Canada, all of the countries participating made clear that democracy should be a core principle for this summit.
So were consistent with that collective decision, not just the U.S. one. And if that was the reason that you know, as the President of Honduras, we respect her decision. If she wants to make a stand on that issue and feels differently, thats obviously her sovereign right.
But my point on that is that it doesnt interfere with our relationship with Honduras, with the Vice Presidents personal relationship with President Castro, with Hondurass participation in the summit which you mentioned; they do plan to participate. The Foreign Minister will be here, and we look forward to fulsome engagement and follow-up. And well continue to do all the private sector work that I described.
Guatemala is a different question. Again, I you know, you can refer you to Ill refer you to the government of Guatemala for the reasons President Giammattei may not come.
I can only say on that: Weve been consistent on the issue of principle as well. Weve said that corruption is a core part of the Root Causes Strategy that President Biden put out an executive order on fighting corruption around the world, and weve been following up on that. Weve been following up in terms of Guatemala.
Im sure you saw last month we sanctioned and designated the newly re-appointed attorney general over issues of corruption. We set up an anti-corruption task force.
So, were just going to continue to be consistent and principled on the issues we think are important.
So, once again, it hasnt prevented our work with the government of Guatemala or even the President of the Guatemala, for that matter, with whom we have engaged extensively. And it hasnt stood in the way of the economic development that were trying to and succeeding in delivering, or uplifting women and providing opportunity and empowering women in Guatemala and elsewhere. So, thats how I see the situation there.
Q Hi, how are you? I wanted to ask you regarding this last question: How confident are you that these issues about root causes of migration can be addressed without talking to the government delegations? Because, you know, like there is, like, civil society and other representatives, as youve said, that it will be interesting to talk about the bilaterals if there are going to be any in which the Vice President is going to take part.
And another question is: Is the Vice President going to meet with the Spanish delegation with regarding an announcement that was circulated last week about possibly both Spain and Canada this was published by Axios taking Central American refugees from the United States, from the border? Thank you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, first of all, on the first part, let me be clear: We are talking to and the Vice President is talking to the countries in question. I mentioned their representation will be here. Our government-to-government work goes on. We have diplomats in the field. There are lots of phone calls.
So, when you say, you know, Can the root causes be addressed without dealing directly with the governments? no, we dont think so. Its very helpful to deal with the governments as we do and we will continue to do, even as we also engage civil society and the private sector.
And again, I want to be clear: All of the governments weve talked about will be represented here in Los Angeles and will have interactions with their American counterparts.
On the issue of Spain and Canada, let me just say: Well have further announcements in the course of the week about migration. It is one of the issues that this summit is tackling, and theres been an in-depth conversation going on with all of the countries of the hemisphere but then also some external partners like Spain, which has been really helpful including, frankly, on the root causes in Central America issue, but also potentially on migration. So, well have more to say on that in the course of the week. But theres definitely in-depth conversations going on about a regional approach to those issues. And the two countries you mentioned are a core part of that.
Maybe well take one last question.
Q Thank you. Thank you for having this. Since my colleagues beat me to the attendance questions, Ill ask about the investment. In terms of keeping the governments of the region up to date with your actions and your announcements, are these governments are the governments of Giammattei and Castro, and I suppose Bukele not so much, part of these announcements? Are they informed ahead of time of these announcements like the Gap, Visa, and so on that you mentioned? Or are they just going to find out tomorrow when the embargo breaks?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The initiative that Ive described is based in the Partnership for Central America, which is a non-governmental entity that was set up in the context of the Vice Presidents call to action. And most of this private sector work and these discussions have been in that in that context.
I think it goes without saying that major investments of the scale that Ive been talking to also entail and involve contact with the government by the companies in question. So, its not part of our process necessarily to engage the government as we discuss and encourage and work on these investments, but its also not in any way going on behind their backs.
They in fact, they welcome it. I know President Giammattei has underscored his personal interest in making foreign direct investment a priority for his country. President Castro, the same thing.
So, in terms of driving this process, I think its fair to say, you know, were doing it transparently, were on the same page, and we have a common interest in increasing jobs and foreign direct investment.
MODERATOR: All right. Thank you very much to our speaker and thank you, everyone, for joining us.
As a reminder, that was on background to a senior administration official and the contents are embargoed until Tuesday, June 7, 5:00 a.m. Eastern Time and 2:00 a.m. Pacific Time.
We will follow up with all of you on some supporting materials, and we look forward to tomorrows announcements. Thank you very much.
END 5:42 P.M. EDT
Link:
Posted in Personal Empowerment
Comments Off on Background Press Call by a Senior Administration Official on the Vice President’s Engagements Regarding Root Causes of Migration – The White House
Mass Shootings Are Mostly Committed by Men: How Might a Gender Lens Help Us Understand This? PRIO Blogs – Peace Research Institute Oslo
Posted: at 4:49 am
Even though men make up the majority of gun violence perpetrators, most men will never fire a gun in an act of violence. What explains this range of behaviors among men, and does masculinity play a role in determining motivation for men to commit acts of violence?
Most men will never fire a gun in an act of violence. Photo: Lyntha Scott Eiler / Library of Congress via Picryl
Understanding this dynamic necessitates looking at the interplay between gender, guns and violence. In doing so, we highlight three important arenas:
On May 14th, a white 18-year-old man drove 2.5 hours from his hometown to a small grocery store in Buffalo, NY, where he then proceeded to kill 10 people, the majority of them being black. While this attack is being investigated by the FBI as a racially motivated hate crime, many have highlighted how masculinity played a role in this mass shooting.
Importantly, the shooter released a 180-page manifesto referencing the Great Replacement theory. The Great Replacement theory, which has many racist underpinnings, claims that non-white men are moving to white-majority countries to out-number them. Simultaneously, efforts are allegedly made to weaken white men in these countries.
There have been a number of mass shootings globally by white men who have referenced this theory, including in Norway and New Zealand. Moreover, researchers have highlighted how these men held certain misogynistic ideas of what it means to be a man, arguing that this played a role in why they committed their act of violence. It is important to recognize the specific ideological connection these three attacks (and many others) share rather than viewing them as isolated events. Masculinity played an important role in all three events.
Globally, men, and especially young men, constitute the overwhelming majority of perpetrators of lethal violence. However, identifying the small number of men who become killers among the masses is difficult. For example, while a relationship can be observed between economic inequality and violence, many men living in inequal societies will never commit violence.
Research on masculinities provides part of the answer to the interrelated questions of why maleness seemingly drives violence, and why this driver of violence applies more to some men than to others. A recurring finding is that the type of manliness that a man identifies with, and aspires to, separates the more violent men from the rest.
Researchers have found that ideals of manhood that combine misogyny and masculine honor the notion that real men must be fierce and use violence to deter disrespect are associated with violent attitudes and behaviors.
For example, endorsement of masculine honor ideology predicts participation in political violence; misogyny is strongly associated with support for violent extremism; men with gender-inequitable ideals of masculinity are more likely to be rapists; individuals with hostile attitudes towards women, and towards gender equality in general, are more prone to intolerance towards other nationalities and religious groups; young men who hold masculine beliefs that violence is an appropriate and legitimate response to disrespect and insults to honor are involved in more violent crime.
In particular, the relationship between masculinity and guns may help to explain why men and boys carry out mass shootings. For many, guns are simply tools for protection, or a piece of sports equipment. For some, though, firearms are a means to express masculine identities. Twice as many men are gun owners in the U.S., and surveys of gun owners show that among them men are more likely than women to watch TV programs or visit web sites about guns.
Interviews help to further unpack the relationship between gun ownership and masculinity. When economic circumstances prevent an individual from playing a traditional role of the family breadwinner, men say that they have turned to guns as a way to assume the role of the armed protector, or as a source of individual empowerment or social meaning.
For some, a history of being bullied led to the use of gun ownership as a means to maintain and protect what they perceive to be a desirable form of masculinity based upon personal honor. Others found guns to be an attractive means of dealing with both threats to their own sense of masculinity and to perceived disadvantages to men as a group. Specific research on school shootings finds that the boys who were the perpetrators had been victims of bullying and had been socialised to see violence as a way to prove their manhood. All these clues suggest that the men or boys who commit mass shootings may be fascinated by guns and perceive that they can use firearms as a means to assert their status and importance in what for many is the final act of their own lives.
Understanding why the majority of mass shootings are perpetrated by men, but also that most men will never assault or kill anyone requires a gender perspective.
Gender research today helps bring nuanced understanding of the varied roles of men and masculinities in violence, and what types of men are drawn to violence. These findings can help create a better understanding of how harmful notions of masculinity develop, and how this issue can be addressed in the hope of avoiding the horrific deeds that keep being perpetrated.
See the rest here:
Posted in Personal Empowerment
Comments Off on Mass Shootings Are Mostly Committed by Men: How Might a Gender Lens Help Us Understand This? PRIO Blogs – Peace Research Institute Oslo
What is LGBTQIA+? The acronym for the queer community keeps evolving. – Yahoo Life
Posted: at 4:46 am
As the queer community continues to evolve, so does the language used to describe it. (Credit: Getty images)
Once upon a time, four letters were commonly used to describe the queer community as a whole: "L" for lesbian, "G" for gay, "B" for bisexual and "T" for trans, creating an acronym: LGBT.
But that was then, and this is now. As new terminologies, identities and experiences appear in the zeitgeist, the acronym has since picked up a few more letters: "Q" for queer and/or questioning, "I" for intersex and "A" for asexual, creating the widely used acronym: "LGBTQIA+" with that "+" on the end meant to cover anyone who feels their queer identity was not otherwise represented.
The alphabet soup can be a lot to swallow for some (including Lea DeLaria, who's poked fun in the past about the ever-growing acronym), and some prefer to stick to "LGBTQ" or "LGBTQ+" or even, simply, "queer" (DeLaria's choice). But there is a reason and history behind its existence.
Before the rise of the acronym, people often simply said, "the gay community" or "the gay and lesbian community" which left out bisexual people, who make up the majority of the LGBTQIA+ population as a whole, and transgender people, a group that is largely credited for spearheading the queer-rights movement to begin with. Sometime in the the 1970s, queer activists popularized usage of the "LGB" acronym as a way to display unity. The "T" was later added, in the 1990s, meant to be a further step toward inclusion.
More recently, the letter "Q" was added as a way to acknowledge those exploring their gender or sexual identity, or those who don't identify with any of the first four letters, preferring "queer."
Sarah Kate Ellis, CEO of GLAAD, the worlds largest media advocacy organization for LGBTQ (the acronym used by GLAAD) rights, tells Yahoo Life the evolution of the acronym represents the community's "growth, strength and vitality, and our future," adding that as more people of different experiences and backgrounds come out now including those who identify with a range of terms, including nonbinary and xenogender in record numbers, its important to see that reflected in changing terms and acronyms.
Story continues
The LGBTQIA+ acronym, seen on a sign here in Paris earlier this month, has become a global go-to. (Photo: Adrien Fillon/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Whichever acronym is used, knowing the basics of these terms is important to understand the complexities of the queer experience. Heres a quick overview:
Lesbian: A woman who is physically, romantically and/or emotionally attracted to other women.
Gay: A word that describes a person who is physically, romantically and/or emotionally attracted to people of the same sex or gender.
Bisexual (also Bi or Bi+): A person with the capacity to be physically, romantically and/or emotionally attracted to more than one gender, though not necessarily at the the same time or to the same degree.
Transgender: A people whose gender identity is different from the sex they were assigned at birth. They may also use other terms, in addition to transgender, to describe their gender more specifically such as nonbinary or gender nonconforming. (Others can be found in GLAADs Transgender Glossary.)
Queer: Often embraced by younger generations, "queer" is used to describe an identity that is not heterosexuality, or exclusive to one particular thing. People who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, or anything else, may also embrace the "queer" label, as more singular labels may be perceived as too limiting.
Questioning: A word used to describe people who are in the process of exploring their sexual orientation and/or gender identity.
Intersex: A person with one or more innate sex characteristics like genitals, internal reproductive organs and chromosomes that fall outside of traditional conceptions of male or female bodies. Their male or female gender identity is typically assigned at birth by medical providers and/or parents. Sometimes, controversially, that decision involves surgically altering genitalia to match this decision.
Asexual: A person who does not experience sexual attraction. Sometimes shortened to "ace," it's also an umbrella term that can include other identities such as demisexual, which refers to those who do not experience sexual attraction to others unless they form a strong emotional bond with them first.
Definitions aside, its important to understand that each term may mean something different to different people, based on their own lived experiences.
Bottom line? There's no one way to be L, G, B, T, Q, I or A. What is important, however, Ellis explains, is to know the language first, in order to acknowledge and celebrate differences. Asking people how they describe themselves (including what their pronouns are) is equally as important.
During a time when the queer community is under constant attack by state lawmakers across the country, Ellis says it has never been more vital for the country to learn about the importance of language and unity.
LGBTQ[IA+] people are part of the most diverse community in the world, representing different sexual orientations and genders, as well as all races, religions and from all regions, she says. Language signals solidarity within the community and to everyone outside of it that we are different and still united in our fight for freedom and equality for all.
Want lifestyle and wellness news delivered to your inbox?Sign up here for Yahoo Lifes newsletter.
Read more from the original source:
What is LGBTQIA+? The acronym for the queer community keeps evolving. - Yahoo Life
Posted in Zeitgeist Movement
Comments Off on What is LGBTQIA+? The acronym for the queer community keeps evolving. – Yahoo Life
A 35-Year-Old Man Listens to My Chemical Romances The Black Parade for the First Time – Consequence
Posted: at 4:46 am
When My Chemical Romance broke out with 2004sThree Cheers for Sweet Revenge, I didnt notice. A junior in high school, I was too busy listening to Radiohead, Dr. Dre, or the Broadway musicalRent, depending on what group of friends I was trying to fit in with at the time. And by the release of the the zeitgeist shattering followup, 2006sThe Black Parade,I was somewhere off at college, mismanaging my study time whilelost in a cloud of bong smoke.
Every music lover has blind spots, and every budding critic tries to fill in the gaps as they go. However, by the time I earned my first bylines, My Chemical Romance had already gone on hiatus. There were more pressing gaps to fill, even as I tried to keep up with the dozens of new albums released every month.
But as the now-legacy rockers began to assemble for a much-delayed reunion tour earlier this spring, I decided the time had come. I waited until my one-year-old was napping, popped on my best headphones, and listened to The Black Paradefor the first time.
Uh, holy shit. This album rules.
The Black Paradeopens with The End. and the sound of a hospital heart rate monitor as The Patient slides inexorably towards death. Now, come one, come all to this tragic affair, Gerard Way begins by way of invitation. Wipe off that makeup, whats in is despair.
The words brought back a high school memory: one of my goth buddies mocking the emo kids for their theatrical anguish, as if the only way you should be allowed to wear black eyeliner is if your music had growls instead of singing.
That same friend spent most of his free time rapping every word to Limp Bizkits Nookie, in case you had any illusions about his taste. Now, almost 20 years later, I could appreciate the sly humor of, Wipe off that makeup, whats in is despair, and the playfulness of opening an album with The End.
My Chemical Romances rock opera ambitions are on full display with the album anchor, Welcome to the Black Parade. A multi-movement musical suite, it kicks off with tender piano as The Patient recalls their fathers words about death or as the album would have it, joining the Black Parade. Marching drums transform into pummeling percussion as the first movement builds to a cacophonous climax, before the song enters its second, irresistibly catchy act. Well carry on, is a rousing anthem, even followed with, And though youre dead and gone, believe me/ Your memory will carry on.
Read more from the original source:
A 35-Year-Old Man Listens to My Chemical Romances The Black Parade for the First Time - Consequence
Posted in Zeitgeist Movement
Comments Off on A 35-Year-Old Man Listens to My Chemical Romances The Black Parade for the First Time – Consequence
Commentary: How Anton Chekhov became the playwright of the moment – Los Angeles Times
Posted: at 4:46 am
The hectic rhythms of this age are not those of an Anton Chekhov play. Yet the Russian writer is very much in evidence right now.
More consumed with questions than with answers, Chekhovs plays depict human beings rather than heroes or villains. Life is captured in plots in which not much seems to happen yet by the end everything is changed.
All of this runs counter to our sensation-seeking, moralizing, politically divisive zeitgeist. But theater artists, filmmakers and novelists, drawn to the interior richness of Chekhovs dramas, have discovered not only the timeliness of his untimely work but also its aesthetic pliancy and openness.
Suddenly, Chekhov seems to be everyones favorite collaborator. And many of us are beginning to remember that, despite our differences, were still at heart introspective Chekhovian characters.
Chelsea Kurtz and Hugo Armstrong in Uncle Vanya at Pasadena Playhouse.
(Jeff Lorch)
A new production of Uncle Vanya is underway at Pasadena Playhouse under the direction of Michael Michetti. The translation, a partnership between playwright and director Richard Nelson and the veteran team of Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky, had its 2018 premiere at San Diegos Old Globe in a supple, compact and exquisitely intimate production that made it seem as if we were eavesdropping on the characters.
I doubted after that revival that I would ever again have such an emotionally intense experience of Uncle Vanya, but then I saw Drive My Car, this years Oscar winner for international feature film. Co-written and directed by Ryusuke Hamaguchi, the movie (streaming on HBO Max) is adapted from Haruki Murakamis story of the same title from his collection Men Without Women. Chekhovs play figures prominently and gives the film its soul.
The protagonist, Kafuku, is a middle-aged actor mourning the death of his unfaithful wife. Hes been invited to direct Uncle Vanya in Hiroshima, a city resurrected from ashes. Kafuku, a shell of his former self, has performed the role of Vanya before and learned his lines through a tape his wife prepared of the script. Revisiting Chekhov in Hiroshima slowly brings him back to life.
Hamaguchi directs with exemplary restraint. The storys movement is subterranean. We observe a haunted Kafuku conducing rehearsals; we listen along as he replays his ghostly Vanya tape in the car to and from the theater; and we watch him reluctantly open up to his young female driver, who also happens to be drowning in complicated grief. Together they enact offstage the meaning of Chekhovs play.
Hidetoshi Nishijima and Tko Miura in the movie Drive My Car.
(The Match Factory)
Uncle Vanya has been described as Chekhovs most spiritual work. Vanya, a middle-aged manager of his familys country estate, and Sonya, his unmarried niece, have sacrificed themselves for the sake of Serebryakov, Sonyas father, who was married to Vanyas beloved dead sister. A crotchety retired professor, Serebryakov has returned with Elena, his stunningly beautiful and much younger second wife, throwing the households dull routine into chaos.
Vanya falls under Elenas spell, as does Astrov, the doctor with a passion for both environmentalism and vodka whom Sonya unrequitedly loves. Rejected as a lover by Elena and enraged when Serebryakov announces that he wants to put the estate up for sale, Vanya feels that he has wasted his life. His anger, once farcically discharged, turns inward and his thoughts are set on death. The play is a study in learning to bear failure and futility, if not for oneself then for those loved ones, like lonely Sonya, who has enough sorrow without the addition of her uncles suicide.
Surviving disillusionment without succumbing to despair, persevering after dreams have been shattered, finding the will to keep going when all that appears ahead is a succession of monotonous days Uncle Vanya, now that I think of it, may be the perfect play for our pandemic-scarred moment.
Gary Shteyngart recognizes this connection in his recent novel Our Country Friends, which takes place just as COVID-19 is sweeping the world. Set in a private bungalow-colony in New Yorks Hudson Valley where a group of friends has holed up during the pandemic, the book, which includes a backyard performance of Uncle Vanya, is Chekhovian in its essential framework.
The dramatis personae of the novel are listed at the start, with shorthand descriptions normally reserved for plays. Sasha, a novelist worried about the fate of a television deal that would allow him to hold on to his bohemian country property, and his psychiatrist wife, Masha, are the Russian-born hosts of an extended reunion that brings to the fore questions of endurance. How, the novel asks, can the characters move forward with a modicum of grace in the wake of betrayal, defeat and the suffering that is inherent in the human condition?
The tragic poet writes from a sense of crisis, the distinguished drama critic Eric Bentley contended. The comic poet is less apt to write out of a particular crisis than from that steady ache of misery which in human life is even more common than crisis and so a more insistent problem.
In a magnificently Chekhovian aside, Bentley adds, When we get up tomorrow morning, we may well be able to do without our tragic awareness for an hour or two but we shall desperately need our sense of the comic.
Catastrophe, as many of us have come to realize during these difficult last years, offers no protection from the assaults of daily living. Even in a deadly pandemic, pets get sick, couples break up, heart attacks occur and fender-benders ruin an afternoon.
With his compassionate humor, Chekhov neither indicts his characters nor lets them off the hook for their myopic concerns. His plays are a tonic reminder to artists across disciplines that lives are lived not in headlines but in passing moments. Big things occur in Chekhov. Houses are lost, guns occasionally go off and people die. But the focus is on muddling through.
Chekhovs artistic vision offers a corrective to the Twitter metabolism of our increasingly virtual culture. Nothing, it turns out, is more powerful than our effect on one another. Other people may drive us crazy, but it is for their sake that we find the stamina to go on living. Uncle Vanya is a bleak play, but its also a genuinely consoling one.
Rachel Cusks recent novel Second Place, another pandemic-era tale set in a bucolic backwater, acknowledges a debt to Lorenzo in Taos, Mable Dodge Luhans 1932 memoir of the time D.H. Lawrence came to stay with her in New Mexico. But the story of a narcissistic artist in this case a painter who arrives as a guest of honor and dishonorably wrecks the precarious equilibrium established by a writer mother, her daughter, their significant others and a wildcard guest evokes The Seagull, Chekhovs masterly comedy about artists in love.
Cusks refusal to let her storys brewing clashes reach any melodramatic conclusions also suggests the influence of Uncle Vanya. Perhaps Im reading Chekhov into the novel, but the ironic interplay of creative personalities and egos makes it impossible not to think of The Seagull, which is enjoying its own turn in the spotlight.
A new adaption by director Yasen Peyankov simply called Seagull is nearing the end of its run at Chicagos Steppenwolf Theatre. And New Yorks inventive downtown troupe Elevator Repair Service will be doing its own Seagull this summer in a version that, according to the companys website, reimagines Chekhovs classic drama by blurring the line between a play and a frank chat with the audience.
This is a strategy that was recently deployed in the Wilma Theaters flamboyant deconstruction of The Cherry Orchard adapted by Russian director Dmitry Krymov in conjunction with the Hothouse Company. Characters tromped through the audience with their luggage and a few spectators were called to the stage to help with a necktie and participate in a volleyball match. Yes, volleyball was played in a production that was unapologetically, though not gratuitously, anachronistic.
A scene from the Wilma Theaters adaptation of The Cherry Orchard, directed by Dmitry Krymov.
(Johanna Austin)
The Cherry Orchard dramatizes a societal shift between the land-owning gentry and the descendants of serfs, who are ready to capitalize on their initiative and seize what was hitherto withheld from them. Its no surprise then that in a period of momentous historical transition artists would be drawn to experiment with this seismic play.
In The Orchard, opening later this month in New York, Ukrainian director Igor Golyak presents a hybrid production that includes an immersive performance at the Baryshnikov Arts Center and a separate interactive experience online. The cast, which includes such stage luminaries as Jessica Hecht and Mark Nelson, features Mikhail Baryshnikov as both Anton Chekhov and Firs, the elderly servant whos left behind when the estate is ultimately auctioned off.
Chekhov, of course, is rarely absent from the repertoire, but I cant remember when hes been so adventurously present. Many of these offerings have been long in the works, but something is palpably in the air.
Michetti said that he has long wanted to do Uncle Vanya and jumped at the chance when Pasadena Playhouse presented him with the opportunity. Extrapolating from his own interest, he offered a compelling explanation for this sudden proliferation of Chekhov.
The pandemic has led many people to reassess their lives, to decide whether theyve made the right choices and to see if there might be another chapter for them, he says. So many things have shaken us up. The world as we knew it changed. For those in the theater, the entire industry was taken away. This really felt like an opportunity to answer the call to look at our lives, a very Chekhovian thing to do.
Michetti calls the Great Resignation the very stuff of Chekhov. Certainly, his characters are forever contemplating roads not taken or abandoned. What the psychoanalyst Adam Phillips calls the unlived life is the one that invariably seems to preoccupy them most.
But the plays dont hector or propound moral lessons. Instead, they depict how we exist in time, as critic Richard Gilman astutely observed. They show us the way we try to escape an unsatisfying present through speculative fictions about how our suffering will eventually be redeemed through requited love or satisfying work or, failing those, Gods mercy.
Chekhov saw this tendency as human, all-too-poignantly human. His art doesnt seek to correct but merely to point out that as were dreaming of better days our real lives are quietly unfolding.
Here is the original post:
Commentary: How Anton Chekhov became the playwright of the moment - Los Angeles Times
Posted in Zeitgeist Movement
Comments Off on Commentary: How Anton Chekhov became the playwright of the moment – Los Angeles Times
The Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts Announces 2022-2023 Season Featuring Two World Premieres & More – Broadway World
Posted: at 4:46 am
The Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County has announced its lineup for the 11th season of THEATER UP CLOSE, created in collaboration with Zoetic Stage and City Theatre. This season's Theater Up Close series returns with five extraordinary productions, including two world premieres by Miami playwrights Michael McKeever and Vanessa Garcia, one Florida premiere and the regional premiere of Heidi Schreck's Pulitzer and Tony Award nominated hit Broadway play What the Constitution Means to Me.
"The Arsht Center was very proud to present the 10th Anniversary Theater Up Close series to supportive South Florida theater enthusiasts," said Liz Wallace, vice president of programming for the Arsht Center. "We welcome the community back for a strong, wide ranging, engaging and thought provoking 2022-2023 season."
"We at Zoetic Stage are enormously excited to be partnering with the Arsht Center for our 11th season! Our programming for the 2022-2023 season has been carefully curated, crafted with stories about personalized American experiences igniting a wanderlust filled with moments surrounding human connectivity and moving forward," said Zoetic Stage Artistic Director Stuart Meltzer.
"City Theatre is very glad to be included in the Arsht Center's Theatre Up Close Series for the opportunity it offers our company to bring audiences interesting full-length plays that we are excited to produce, such as the regional premiere of Heidi Schreck's What the Constitution Means to Me. We expect it will resonate with South Florida audiences as powerfully as it did during its multi-award winning, sold-out run on Broadway," said City Theatre's Artistic Director Margaret M. Ledford
The lineup for the 2022-2023 THEATER UP CLOSE series includes the following:
Zoetic Stage and Adrienne Arsht Center present
By Lynn Nottage
Directed by Stuart Meltzer
October 13 - 30, 2022
Mlima is a magnificent African elephant trapped by the underground international ivory market. As he follows a trail littered by a history of greed, Mlima takes us on a journey through memory, fear, tradition and the penumbra between want and need. From Lynn Nottage, the two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright of Sweat and Ruined, Mlima's Tale is a captivating and haunting fable come to life.
City Theatre and Adrienne Arsht Center present
By Heidi Schreck
Directed by Margaret M. Ledford
December 1-18, 2022
Playwright Heidi Schreck's timely and galvanizing play became a sensation off-Broadway and then Broadway where it received two Tony Award nominations, the Pulitzer Prize nomination, and countless other accolades. Hilariously hopeful, and achingly human, Heidi becomes her teenage self, earning college tuition by winning constitutional debate competitions across the United States. Every amendment leads to surprising storytelling as adult Heidi traces the profound relationship between four generations of women and the founding document that shaped their lives. Theatrical, personal, and boundary-breaking, Schreck's play breathes new life and understanding of the Constitution and imagines the impact of its evolution on the next generation of Americans.
Zoetic Stage and Adrienne Arsht Center present
By Michael McKeever
Directed by Stuart Meltzer
January 12 - 29, 2023
Over the course of some 60 years - starting in 1969 and ending in 2032 - the Cabot family tries to keep up with the world as it evolves around them. Epic in scope yet intimate by nature, American Rhapsody weaves the lives of its main characters through the ever-changing landscape of the American zeitgeist as it speeds through the last half of the 20th century into the turbulence of today and well beyond: civil unrest, the feminist movement, the greed of the '80s, the horrors of 9/11, the 2008 financial crisis, same-sex marriage, the COVID-19 pandemic. As the family evolves into a new America, so does its cultural identity as members of other races and sexual orientations marry into and redefine what the family thought it was.
Zoetic Stage and Adrienne Arsht Center present
Music by Tom Kitt
Book & Lyrics by Brian Yorkey
Directed by Stuart Meltzer
March 16 - April 9, 2023
Next to Normal is a deeply moving rock musical that explores how one household copes with crisis and mental illness. Winner of three 2009 Tony Awards, including Best Musical Score, and the 2010 Pulitzer Prize, Next to Normal was also chosen as one of the year's 10 best shows by critics at publications across the country, including The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, Rolling Stone and The New York Times.
Dad's an architect. Mom rushes to pack lunches and pour cereal. Their daughter and son are bright, wisecracking teens. They appear to be a typical American family. And yet their lives are anything but normal, because the mother has been battling manic depression for 16 years. Next to Normal takes audiences into the minds and hearts of each character, presenting their family's story with love, sympathy and heart.
Zoetic Stage and Adrienne Arsht Center present
By Vanessa Garcia
Directed by Sarah Hughes
May 4 - 21, 2023
Catherine is searching for something authentic as she embarks on a "Lewis-and-Clark-esque" trip across America sponsored by Monteverde Moonshine with her new lover and colleague, Lewis. Along the way, they pick up a wayward nun named Rosalie who has just gone through deep loss, meet a queer homeschooled teenager named Blake and rummage through the layers of migration and gender inequity that make up America. As Catherine travels, she comes to more questions than answers about "the real America," her own identity and what authenticity even means anymore.
Read more from the original source:
Posted in Zeitgeist Movement
Comments Off on The Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts Announces 2022-2023 Season Featuring Two World Premieres & More – Broadway World
Preserve the past, please! – Dhaka Tribune
Posted: at 4:46 am
Correct me if I am wrong but there is a collective sense of apathy across social sections to protect, cherish and preserve the past. As Bangladesh stands at fifty, brushing aside detractors, looking into the future does not conjure up the image of a long dark tunnel anymore. Well, for someone who is just as old the country, there was a time when society lived with the mantra of addressing the challenges at hand, keeping future thoughts out of mind. Actually, with high unemployment among the educated, food shortages, recurring natural disasters, political conflagrations plus a pervasive feeling of malaise, looking ahead was too much of a luxury.
Live now, tackle the immediate problems and think about the future later, was the rule of the day. That rather dismal picture of Bangladesh, wracked by problems, is more like a faded chapter, although standing at fifty, its often the past that comes back in moments of nostalgia. Or, shall we say, delectable dive into the days gone by?
While trying to live for the moment, a mistake was made: We wiped away the past.
Dhaka, once a sleepy city, now operates as a bustling capital offering the best and certainly the worst of other capitals.
We all know the problems but apart from the glaring ones like traffic jams and congestion, the other, often neglected issue is the way Dhakas heritage is being systematically expunged.
From buildings to customs to music to food to architecture, the past is being obliterated in the face of a leviathan called predatory urban ideals. I know, modernity has its kick although its allure is ephemeral. Deny that and you will be perpetuating a delusion!
Dhakas ponds and old architecture:
Its hard to believe that once this city was interspersed with small water bodies or ponds. Almost every area had several houses with ponds at the back. To talk about Elephant Road, where I spent my teenage days in the early 80s, several homes had ponds. There isnt a single one now! The same applies for old buildings. Caught in the apartment culture, all individual buildings were demolished. Of course, the apartment was inevitable since land was limited and the number of people living in the city rose phenomenally. However, the city does not have a photo archive of buildings that were torn down. Hence, its almost impossible to reconstruct an image of Dhaka in the first decades after independence. In the Old part of the city, structures dating back to the 19th century are either left in a dilapidated condition or demolished to make space for new ones.
Old Dhaka is replete with history although a coordinated approach to safeguard the past is absent. Accepted, some of the privately owned buildings will be knocked down at the decision of the owners but a government run initiative can preserve images plus a wide variety of historical objects from furniture to utensils as objects of historical and cultural significance.
Recent urban history is scant:
Dhaka has experienced radical change since 1990. In the last thirty-two years, the cultural and social creed of Dhaka of the periods just after liberation was obliterated in a mad rush to accommodate new outlooks.
Just to give an example, portraying the city of the 70s and 80s in celluloid will be an uphill task because the social zeitgeist of the period, exhibited through a variety of items including, cars, clothes, books, posters has not be preserved.
In the 70s and 80s, the main past time for teenagers and the elderly alike was reading popular fiction like Masud Rana, Kuasha, Dasyu Bonhur, Dasyu Panja, Bionic Mehedi. In the afternoons, people listened to film trailers on radio followed by world music. Today, copies of these books are extremely rare. Once in a blue moon, some old Masud Rana copies emerge at the Nilkhet second hand market to be quickly taken by someone in what can be called a serendipitous find.
Copies of these books were not preserved. During last Eid, a collector of old Bichitra magazines sold his copies dating from the early 80s and late 70s for Tk500 a piece. The magazines, covering the heyday of footballing glory, the rise of the British Bangladeshi diaspora in the wake of the race related protests in 1978, floods in 1980, the obsession to head for the Middle East for highly paid employment to Bangladeshs first ever football world cup qualification adventure in 1985, opened the door to a forgotten era.
Unfortunately, no library in Dhaka can offer an archive of newspapers from the 80s, the turbulent years marked by the anti autocratic movement, leaving the young of today to be left at the hands of partisan narrators to form an idea about Bangladeshs political past.
For music lovers, a regular haunt was the Elephant Road Rainbowr Gali which housed recording centres, Soor Bichitra, Rhythm and Rainbow. Hardly any image or video recorded clips of these placed can be found.
Dhakas first air-conditioned fast food restaurant was Coffee House in Elephant Road, which is also lost in the abyss of time since images, video recordings of the place do not exist.
Recently, the European Union National Institutes for Culture (EUNIC) through Alliance Francaise, British Council and Goethe Institute and BUET, launched a project Learning from Puran Dhaka aimed at protecting, preserving and cherishing the cultural heritage, architecture, river and creed of Old Dhaka.
Focusing on how the River Buriganga shaped livelihood and zeitgeist of Old Dhaka, this project will involve teachers, architects, researchers from Bangladesh, France and India.
To encourage the residents of Old Dhaka about the significance of the project, a series of visually stimulating cultural events will be organised in the future from colourful rallies to processions by French street performers using stilts known commonly as Les Grande Personnes.
At the launching event of the project, the EU Ambassador to Bangladesh, Charles Whiteley, acknowledged the historical, cultural and gastronomic heritage of Old Dhaka, saying: the vibrant and indomitable spirit of Old Dhaka is represented through its crafts, mouth-watering dishes and architecture dating back to the Mughal period. Cultural heritage is also a driver of sustainability in an economic, social and environmental perspective. On the socio-economic side, it is an important asset to enhance sustainable development by providing employment opportunities and supporting economic livelihoods.
A museum on Dhaka:
Since independence, this city, often termed the microcosm of towns and districts across the country, has undergone astonishing transformations. As the capital of the war ravaged country, Dhaka endured post liberation socio-economic malaise, political maelstrom, austerity and hardship moving slowly but inexorably towards prosperity and modernism. This journey and everything that symbolise the undaunted spirit, encapsulates the perseverance of this nation. On the 50th year, standing as old as the country and having experienced all of her highs and lows, I earnestly feel that there should be a concerted effort to safeguard historic buildings plus the recent urban history, covering the social metamorphosis since 1972.
To end with a quote from Richard Moe, the historic preservation advocate: there may have been a time when preservation was about saving an old building here and there, but those days are gone. Preservation is the business of saving communities and the values they embody.
Towheed Feroze is an avid admirer of the kaleidoscopic charm of Old Dhaka.
Read this article:
Posted in Zeitgeist Movement
Comments Off on Preserve the past, please! – Dhaka Tribune
Free Speech Makes People Free. We Must Defend All Speech Without Apology | Opinion – Newsweek
Posted: at 4:44 am
It was just a sticker. It said, "China Kinda Sus."
That was the entirety of the message that led William P. Gilligan, president of Boston's Emerson College, to write a letter to the whole college community accusing the conservative student group that distributed the sticker of "anti-Asian bigotry and hate."
It didn't matter that the message was a criticism of the Chinese government, not Asian people. Nor did it matter that one of the students handing out the stickers, KJ Lynum, is herself Asian (in fact, one-third of the group's members were Asian). The college suspended the group and found it guilty of violating the school's "Bias Related Behavior" policy.
Later, disheartened by the experience, KJ dropped out of school.
On campus and increasingly beyond, labeling speech "hateful" makes those in authority feel empowered to shut it down. It should be no surprise, then, that the label is sometimes used frivolously to emotionally manipulate people into accepting unjustified exercises of power, including the punishment of the expression of ideas.
Off campus, activists used the label to try to pressure Netflix to take down recent comedy specials featuring Dave Chappelle and Ricky Gervais, while some Republican legislatures use it to justify banning the teaching of Critical Race Theory. When Elon Musk announced his plan to buy Twitter to promote free speech, some of America's more eager censors lamented an "uncontrolled" internet where some people may be free to express opinions others dislike or find distasteful.
If you ask Americans, most will say they strongly support free speech protections. However, label the speech "hateful" and that support plummets, particularly among Democrats.
We've all heard the saying, "Hate speech is not free speech." There's just one problem with that mantra: It isn't legally true, at least in America. The First Amendment's protections for free speech do not include a "hate speech" exception. That's due, in large part, to the problem of subjectivity: Who decides what's hateful and by what standard? Donald Trump? Joe Biden? Should we ask Emerson President Gilligan? Eighty-two percent of Americans say we can't agree on a definition of hateful speech, even as 40 percent say the government should ban it.
In the United Kingdom and Europe, where hate speech laws are common, they are used to punish everything from YouTube jokes to critiques of religious figures.
After failing for 40 years in America, the hate speech-inspired "words that wound" conception of free speech popularized by Critical Race Theory co-founder Richard Delgado in the 1980s might now be overtaking the "sticks and stones" approachat least on campus and on social media. In Delgado's conception, words can function as a form of violence: "They can assault; they can injure," says the description of his 1993 book on the subject that he co-wrote with other CRT founders.
For most Americans in the '80s and '90s, especially free speech advocates, the conflation of words with violence was seen as a direct challenge to our liberal democratic order. Sigmund Freud once said, "the man who first flung a word of abuse at his enemy instead of a spear was the founder of civilization." Equate words with violence and soon people will feel justified in using violence instead of words to settle their disagreements. Democracy, in which disputes are resolved not through violence, but through debate, discussion, and voting, cannot survive the collapse of that critical distinction.
The "words that wound" notion of speech inspired a movement for restrictive speech codes on college campuses. It was routinely defeated in court, but a growing number of students and college administrators still cling to this vision of enlightened censorship. "Hateful rhetoric is violent, and this is impermissible," wrote the editorial board of the University of Virginia's student newspaper earlier this year in demanding the school not allow former Vice President Mike Pence to speak on campus.
Ironically, the growing support for censorship may be due, in part, to free speech advocates winning in the court of law. As First Amendment protections have become stronger during the past half-century, the remaining legal cases often involve less-sympathetic speech at the margins, like that of the Westboro Baptist Church and white nationalists in Charlottesville. Younger generations of Americans who see the First Amendment protect wildly unpopular speech may easily forgetor may never have been taughthow the First Amendment empowered everything from the civil rights movement to the gay rights movement.
But how long will the legal bulwark against additional exceptions to free speech hold? As Judge Learned Hand put it during a 1944 speech, "Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it."
In short, if we don't defend and promote a culture of free expression, we risk losing the culture and our legal protections.
What America needs now more than ever are vocal, nonpartisan free speech advocates to remind Americans why we defend free speech in the first place. We need advocates who won't simply fall back on the circular "because the First Amendment protects it" argument. We need advocates who are willing to unapologetically stand up for the right to speak even the thoughts we hate.
We say "unapologetically" because, too often, even free speech advocates sound like they are apologizing for the offense speech might cause, genuflecting before other values and never issuing a full-throated defense of our speech rights. While such apologies may have their place, they risk distracting from free speech advocates' essential point: That free speech is a fundamental human right for which we need not apologize.
That's why our organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, steadfastly refuses to take a position on the content of the speech we defend, aside from saying that it's protected. Why say more? As Mark R. Hamilton, the courageous former president of the University of Alaska, wrote in a memo to his colleagues, "Attempts to assuage anger or to demonstrate concern by qualifying our support for free speech serve to cloud what must be a clear message."
Freedom of speech allows us to authentically express our individuality, to learn about our world, and to live peacefully within a democratic society. Free speech is an essential ingredient for scientific progress, social justice, and artistic expression. Most simply, freedom of speech enables us to know what our fellow citizens really think and why.
Free speech makes free people. We must not give up the fight to preserve it.
Greg Lukianoff is President & CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) co-author of the bestselling book "The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure." Nico Perrino is Vice President of Communications at FIRE and the host of So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast.
The views in this article are the writers' own.
Read the original here:
Free Speech Makes People Free. We Must Defend All Speech Without Apology | Opinion - Newsweek
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on Free Speech Makes People Free. We Must Defend All Speech Without Apology | Opinion – Newsweek
Opinion: Free speech and guns a winning combination – Appen Media
Posted: at 4:44 am
Lets talk about the First and Second Amendments.
Not those two the original ones.
The original First Amendment created a formula to determine the size of the House of Representatives based on the population of the United States in 1789.
It didnt pass.
The original Second Amendment set out to define when Congress can change its pay.
That didnt pass either.
What we know today as the First Amendment prohibits the government from depriving us of certain freedoms religion, speech, the press, peaceful assembly, and it allows a path to redress grievances with the government.
It begins Congress shall make no law
Pretty clear.
In his distinguished 34-year career on the Supreme Court, Associate Justice Hugo Black said as much.
He was the driving force behind the 1964 Times v. Sullivan decision that declared freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment restrict public officials from suing for defamation.
Black also sat solidly behind the press in the 1971 Pentagon Papers case in which The New York Times published damaging evidence about the government's involvement in Vietnam.
Black wrote: Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.
In an opinion piece, managing editor Pat Fox writes that we should choose our champions for truth-telling carefully.
Ive made my living, raised a family, paid my mortgage thanks to the First Amendment. I get edgy whenever someone tries to mess with it. I dont like it.
And yet
People have messed with it a lot.
There are libel laws sometimes used to intimidate reporters from pursuing stories. Libel laws ostensibly restrict the press from unjustly defaming individuals and organizations.
Also, newspapers cannot copy information verbatim or run a photo from a published work without facing a suit over copywrite infringement.
What gives?
The Constitution says Congress shall make no laws
Well, Im willing to discuss it. Pretty much everyone in the newspaper business loves discussing it.
The press is the only profession, by the way, specifically cited for protection in the Constitution.
One of the best expressions of that distinction came from Justice Potter Stewart in his dissent opinion in a 1971 case involving police searches of newsrooms.
Perhaps as a matter of abstract policy a newspaper office should receive no more protection from unannounced police searches than, say, the office of a doctor or the office of a bank. But we are here to uphold a Constitution. And our Constitution does not explicitly protect the practice of medicine or the business of banking from all abridgement by government. It does explicitly protect the freedom of the press.
I love that.
On the other hand, should I be able to pick out of the air some local businessman and publish an article saying he is a shady no-goodnik who parks in handicapped stalls?
Im willing to discuss that or any other matter relating to the First Amendment and the press. Lets hold a town hall.
Now, concerning the Second Amendment
I dont like anyone messing around with the Constitution not the First, Second, Third or any other amendments.
I grew up in the rural Midwest and spent a lot of my youth hunting, so Im familiar with guns. Many of my friends own one. We want to keep them, too, for a variety of reasons.
We all came by our firearms legally, and we all took safety courses on their proper use.
By golly, wed probably be willing to talk to other people about our guns, maybe discuss safety and care, whether wed ever loan one to a high school senior or whether wed give one to a certified manic depressive.
There are some people who wont talk about these sorts of things, though. Sixty of them are in the U.S. Senate. There are a lot more in the Georgia Legislature.
They wont discuss it.
Read the original:
Opinion: Free speech and guns a winning combination - Appen Media
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on Opinion: Free speech and guns a winning combination – Appen Media
The Age of Intolerance: Cancel Culture’s War on Free Speech – Overton County News
Posted: at 4:44 am
Speak Truth to Power
by John W. Whitehead & Nisha Whitehead
Political correctness is fascism pretending to be manners. George Carlin
Cancel culture political correctness amped up on steroids, the self-righteousness of a narcissistic age, and a mass-marketed pseudo-morality that is little more than fascism disguised as tolerance has shifted us into an Age of Intolerance, policed by techno-censors, social media bullies, and government watchdogs.
Everything is now fair game for censorship if it can be construed as hateful, hurtful, bigoted or offensive provided that it runs counter to the established viewpoint.
In this way, the most controversial issues of our day race, religion, sex, sexuality, politics, science, health, government corruption, police brutality, etc. have become battlegrounds for those who claim to believe in freedom of speech but only when it favors the views and positions they support.
Free speech for me but not for thee is how my good friend and free speech purist Nat Hentoff used to sum up this double standard.
This tendency to censor, silence, delete, label as hateful, and demonize viewpoints that run counter to the cultural elite is being embraced with a near-fanatical zealotry by a cult-like establishment that values conformity and group-think over individuality.
For instance, are you skeptical about the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines? Do you have concerns about the outcome of the 2020 presidential election? Do you subscribe to religious beliefs that shape your views on sexuality, marriage and gender? Do you, deliberately or inadvertently, engage in misgendering identifying a persons gender incorrectly or deadnaming using the wrong pronouns or birth name for a transgender person?
Say yes to any of those questions and then dare to voice those views in anything louder than a whisper and you might find yourself suspended on Twitter, shut out of Facebook, and banned across various social media platforms.
This authoritarian intolerance masquerading as tolerance, civility, and love what comedian George Carlin referred to as fascism pretending to be manners is the end result of a politically correct culture that has become radicalized, institutionalized, and tyrannical.
In the past few years, for example, prominent social media voices have been censored, silenced and made to disappear from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram for voicing ideas that were deemed politically incorrect, hateful, dangerous or conspiratorial.
Most recently, Twitter suspended conservative podcaster Matt Walsh for violating its hate speech policy by sharing his views about transgendered individuals.
The greatest female Jeopardy champion of all time is a man. The top female college swimmer is a man. The first female four star admiral in the Public Health Service is a man. Men have dominated female high school track and the female MMA circuit. The patriarchy wins in the end, Walsh tweeted on December 30, 2021.
J.K. Rowling, author of the popular Harry Potter series, has found herself denounced as transphobic and widely shunned for daring to criticize efforts by transgender activists to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender.
Ironically enough, Rowlings shunning included literal book burning.
Yet as Ray Bradbury once warned, There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running about with lit matches.
Indeed, the First Amendment is going up in flames before our eyes, but those first sparks were lit long ago and have been fed by intolerance all along the political spectrum.
Consider some of the kinds of speech being targeted for censorship or outright elimination.
Offensive, politically incorrect and unsafe speech: Political correctness has resulted in the chilling of free speech and a growing hostility to those who exercise their rights to speak freely. Where this has become painfully evident is on college campuses, which have become hotbeds of student-led censorship, trigger warnings, microaggressions, and red light speech policies targeting anything that might cause someone to feel uncomfortable, unsafe or offended.
Hateful speech: Hate speech speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin, religion, race, disability, or sexual orientation is the primary candidate for online censorship. Corporate internet giants Google, Twitter, and Facebook continue to re-define what kinds of speech will be permitted online and what will be deleted.
Dangerous, anti-government speech: As part of its ongoing war on extremism, the government has partnered with the tech industry to counter online propaganda by terrorists hoping to recruit support or plan attacks. In this way, anyone who criticizes the government online can be considered an extremist and will have their content reported to government agencies for further investigation or deleted.
In fact, the Justice Department is planning to form a new domestic terrorism unit to ferret out individuals who seek to commit violent criminal acts in furtherance of domestic social or political goals. What this will mean is more surveillance, more pre-crime programs, and more targeting of individuals whose speech may qualify as dangerous.
The upshot of all of this editing, parsing, banning, and silencing is the emergence of a new language, what George Orwell referred to as Newspeak, which places the power to control language in the hands of the totalitarian state.
Under such a system, language becomes a weapon to change the way people think by changing the words they use.
The end result is mind control and a sleepwalking populace.
This mind control can take many forms, but the end result is an enslaved, compliant populace incapable of challenging tyranny.
We have allowed our fears fear for our safety, fear of each other, fear of being labeled racist or hateful or prejudiced, etc. to trump our freedom of speech and muzzle us far more effectively than any government edict could.
This is the tyranny of the majority against the minority marching in lockstep with technofascism.
Yet be warned: whatever we tolerate now whatever we turn a blind eye to whatever we rationalize when it is inflicted on others will eventually come back to imprison us, one and all.
At some point or another, depending on how the government and its corporate allies define what constitutes hate or extremism, we the people might all be considered guilty of some thought crime or other.
In other words, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, whatever powers you allow the government and its corporate operatives to claim now, for the sake of the greater good or because you like or trust those in charge, will eventually be abused and used against you by tyrants of your own making.
The police state could not ask for a better citizenry than one that carries out its own censorship, spying and policing.
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president The Rutherford Institute. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org. Nisha Whitehead is the Executive Director of The Rutherford Institute. Information about The Rutherford Institute is available at http://www.rutherford.org.
Read this article:
The Age of Intolerance: Cancel Culture's War on Free Speech - Overton County News
Posted in Freedom of Speech
Comments Off on The Age of Intolerance: Cancel Culture’s War on Free Speech – Overton County News